Hi Lee, I have a question. Is the autofocus in photos/videos and the full hd 60 fps video quality on the R III much worse than that of the Sony a6400? I don't like the A6400 viewfinder and screen, and the quality of low-light shots, so I always wanted to upgrade to R III.
@@afferist I would say that it is better. But keep in mind that the RIII has a much larger sensor than say, the A7III or A7IV. So it doesn't perform quite as well in low light. So if you are doing a lot of low light work and that is important to you. Maybe look at the a7IV instead or the a7III if you want to save a few bucks.
In all tests I've seen and from personal experience shooting many cameras the low light of the Riii is right there with the 24mp counterparts. It's when you go to the Riv it gets noticeably worse in low light
Rii/Riii is still one of the best sensors ever made imo. It's actually just as good in low light as the 24mp ff counterparts. The Riv is super noisy in comparison. They seemed to have improved to low light on the Rv though. If the 7cr had 2 card slots I'd be all over it. As far as durability the Riii is a tank. Mine has been through hell. I've broke multiple Canon 5d's. The Riii has hit concrete more than I'd like to admit but never skips a beat.
I am a hobbyist currently using the Canon Rebel T7 and I'm looking to upgrade to a not so expensive mirrorless camera. Very well done video. Thank you.
Thanks a lot! I used to shoot with a Canon Rebel T7i for a while. Great camera! If you pick up the a7r3 or something similar you are going to really love it!
a7r vi has proven to be a tank. ours has over 240k shutter count and its still chugging. and Pics still still look just as crisp as to when we first bought it.
There is a downside of this camera and all Sony sensors. There is a striping problem. If you Google Sony A7iii striping issue or problem you will see some info. DPreview on the forums the title says Sony A7ii but the writer meant A7iii. The stripping issue is also with the Sony A7Riii. Some people may never see the striping issue but the stripping issue was also found on the newest Sony A7RV. Only cameras that I know off that don't have this issue are contrast detect auto focus cameras and Canon cameras. Canon uses dual auto focus. I think its phase detection on a split pixel that avoids the problem Sony has. There are some work arounds for photo for the striping issue but I don't believe there is for video.
@@Lee_Squire Google this title and you should find a DPreview post. Sony 'striping': here's the fix Also look for this video on TH-cam by ALR Photography PDAF Striping Fix (Stripes / Lines in images due to strong backlighting) And look for this video on TH-cam by David Oastler Sony a7iii and lenses that cause striping I also found this article Google it Under certain conditions and using the Electronic First Curtain Shutter, the Sony A7R-iv will produce horizontal lines in your images. Google this its on fredmiranda Archive 2023 · Sony A7rV and Purple Haze and PDAF Striping This kind of problem shows up when the light source is low and coming in sharp. For example I was photographing formals at a wedding around 6PM and there was trees behind the wedding party and the sun came through a small gab in some branches.
Look out for my upcoming channel. I’m about to do the unthinkable and that is to get me my first prosumer camera. I have spent endless hours watching many TH-cam videos about Sony and I think I’m convinced to take a leap of faith. I can’t wait to get my hands on this new camera and for the first time a prime lens. All that I have seen on TH-cam Sony does not disappoint.
Just adding to this because nobody talks about it... COMPRESSED RAW you can get about 42 bursts or so out of it too. Heck the uncompressed is plenty for sports!
Hell ya, it was my first camera actually, your I think 2023 video was the same as this one, I also got the 24-105 G lens and my god it is still an insane camera
Thanks for the video dude, very helpful, I'm saving for one + a 24-70mm f/2.8 GM used, and if I'm able to get both for under $2200, I'll be very happy and I'll start saving for a new glass.
That’s awesome. Also consider the 24-70 f/2.8 Sigma Art lens. It’s a really good lens. In some tests I’ve seen it’s as sharp or slightly sharper than the GM.
That’s a great point. I think it’s largely because whenever a new camera comes out FOMO sets in for people and all of a sudden whatever you have “isn’t good enough” anymore. I will say that while I agree older cameras can do the job, if money is not a huge barrier, I would most definitely recommend a mirrorless model vs DSLR. And it doesn’t have to be the latest and greatest either. Like the Sony a7R III.
@@Lee_Squire i do have DSRLs and i do have mirrorless, one of the best sensors on the A7Rii. For the professional photography either the OLD DSLRs or the mirrorless can do the job with no questions. What matters is the user. Now a good lens will definatelly makes your life easier. But at this point we are with the technology, a better and latest mirrorless camera wont help you enouph with the frame or resolution size we need in most of the photography applications. I'm a technology fan, on the otherside spending 3-4K every year for a camera gear i would better invest on a fast prime lenses.
@@astasuleo You're right. Definately depends on the user. And I totally agree about getting really good glass. It takes things to another level. You can always upgrade a body later.
Bro , I’ve recently found a Sony used Sony a7riii in excellent condition for around 1,400$ , with around 680 shots and no laser damage and no dead pixels, what do you think? Should I go with a not used Sony a7iii for around 1,200$? Or this a7riii is right for me to buy
I have A7IV and A7riii , I change my a7riii for a7riii for 100€ more with 12.000 shots and it's totally recomend the upgrade , better evf and screen, more mpx if you needed and it don't have the low pass filter so the photos looks more sharp but if you do video I still recommend you a7iii it have better AF , the a7riii it's not bad but a7iii have more coverage but anyway the are 2 great cameras, expend money in lenses because you will see more difference with good glasses than the camera.
That sounds like a decent deal. Just make sure you check it out to make sure everything works! Both are great cameras and will save you a bit of money. Personally I really like the RIII. The screen and evf is better. But it depends on your needs.
The r3 was almost too gooe when it came out. Ive had mine since about a week after release...id like somenof the new ones but i dont need to upgrade yet. Even on DXOMark the R3's sensor is still like 4th or 5th place
Hey Jay thanks for the comment. Yeah I totally agree, I still haven't felt the need to upgrade yet. But I feel like I might upgrade to the RV or the a7IV next. Haven't decided.
@@Lee_Squire I have a7iv and a7riii , the a7iv its far superior in af and speed in menus,buffer , iso performance ,screen and evf but the a7riii its an incredible camera and I will keep it as second camera you can do almost everything than the a7iv in photography but for video its another story .
No hobbyist needs anything like the Riii. None. Get the Canon EOS RP as a hobbyist who does not make money with his camera. Who cares how sticky eye AF is if you’re a hobbyist?! C’mon mannn 🤪
@@tomd4748 I think it depends. You get a lot of quality with this camera. And with it being a bit older now you can save a lot on it. EOS RP is decent but I will say that the aye AF is amazing, hobbyist or not. What matters more long term is glass but since this video is about the camera body I have to disagree. Hobbyist also operate in different price ranges as well. So it’s all a personal decision.
@@Lee_Squire the 7R II was used professionally for years, so I’m 100% sure no hobbyist needs something better. Let’s see their portfolio, then they can show us why such hardware can’t keep up with them, so now they need 61 mpx, or global sensor lol come on. They obsess on the ILC channels, convinced if only they can get their hands on a9Ii or better, they’ll become the next Tony Northrup. So, do they NEED more or do they simply WANT more? Obviously it’s the latter.
Will you be picking up your very own Sony A7R III this year? Are you deciding between two cameras? Let's chat about it below.
Hi Lee, I have a question. Is the autofocus in photos/videos and the full hd 60 fps video quality on the R III much worse than that of the Sony a6400?
I don't like the A6400 viewfinder and screen, and the quality of low-light shots, so I always wanted to upgrade to R III.
@@afferist I would say that it is better. But keep in mind that the RIII has a much larger sensor than say, the A7III or A7IV. So it doesn't perform quite as well in low light. So if you are doing a lot of low light work and that is important to you. Maybe look at the a7IV instead or the a7III if you want to save a few bucks.
@@Lee_Squire thanks
In all tests I've seen and from personal experience shooting many cameras the low light of the Riii is right there with the 24mp counterparts. It's when you go to the Riv it gets noticeably worse in low light
Getting mine in a week
Rii/Riii is still one of the best sensors ever made imo. It's actually just as good in low light as the 24mp ff counterparts. The Riv is super noisy in comparison. They seemed to have improved to low light on the Rv though. If the 7cr had 2 card slots I'd be all over it. As far as durability the Riii is a tank. Mine has been through hell. I've broke multiple Canon 5d's. The Riii has hit concrete more than I'd like to admit but never skips a beat.
Wow! That is crazy haha. I don’t think I have ever dropped a camera! But that is good to know! Also about the low light as well!
it was helpful. thank you.
Glad I could help!
It's an amazing camera. The A7R3 is still my favorite.
Definitely still love it! I am curious about the Sony a7IV or the Sony a7RV
A7RIIIA can be had for £1349 new now in the UK. Absolute bargain of a camera. Still one of the best sensors ever made. Can't go wrong.
I totally agree!
I am a hobbyist currently using the Canon Rebel T7 and I'm looking to upgrade to a not so expensive mirrorless camera. Very well done video. Thank you.
Thanks a lot! I used to shoot with a Canon Rebel T7i for a while. Great camera! If you pick up the a7r3 or something similar you are going to really love it!
No. Buy the EOS R.
a7r vi has proven to be a tank. ours has over 240k shutter count and its still chugging. and Pics still still look just as crisp as to when we first bought it.
There is a downside of this camera and all Sony sensors. There is a striping problem. If you Google Sony A7iii striping issue or problem you will see some info. DPreview on the forums the title says Sony A7ii but the writer meant A7iii. The stripping issue is also with the Sony A7Riii.
Some people may never see the striping issue but the stripping issue was also found on the newest Sony A7RV.
Only cameras that I know off that don't have this issue are contrast detect auto focus cameras and Canon cameras. Canon uses dual auto focus. I think its phase detection on a split pixel that avoids the problem Sony has.
There are some work arounds for photo for the striping issue but I don't believe there is for video.
Hey there. What striping problem are you speaking of? Do you mean banding?
@@Lee_Squire Google this title and you should find a DPreview post.
Sony 'striping': here's the fix
Also look for this video on TH-cam by
ALR Photography
PDAF Striping Fix (Stripes / Lines in images due to strong backlighting)
And look for this video on TH-cam by David Oastler
Sony a7iii and lenses that cause striping
I also found this article Google it
Under certain conditions and using the Electronic First Curtain Shutter, the Sony A7R-iv will produce horizontal lines in your images.
Google this its on fredmiranda
Archive 2023 · Sony A7rV and Purple Haze and PDAF Striping
This kind of problem shows up when the light source is low and coming in sharp. For example I was photographing formals at a wedding around 6PM and there was trees behind the wedding party and the sun came through a small gab in some branches.
Look out for my upcoming channel. I’m about to do the unthinkable and that is to get me my first prosumer camera. I have spent endless hours watching many TH-cam videos about Sony and I think I’m convinced to take a leap of faith. I can’t wait to get my hands on this new camera and for the first time a prime lens. All that I have seen on TH-cam Sony does not disappoint.
Just adding to this because nobody talks about it... COMPRESSED RAW you can get about 42 bursts or so out of it too. Heck the uncompressed is plenty for sports!
That’s a great point! In fact, I always use compressed raw! Quality is still amazing.
great video
Thanks! I appreciate it!
Hell ya, it was my first camera actually, your I think 2023 video was the same as this one, I also got the 24-105 G lens and my god it is still an insane camera
Yeah pretty much haha. There aren't a lot of huge differences between then and now. Still an excellent choice for a lot of folks.
I have the A7RIII
its my backup for my A7iv
How do you like the A7iv? I'm thinking of upgrading at some point this year. Not sure if I'll get the RV or just stick with the IV. We will see.
Thanks for the video dude, very helpful, I'm saving for one + a 24-70mm f/2.8 GM used, and if I'm able to get both for under $2200, I'll be very happy and I'll start saving for a new glass.
That’s awesome. Also consider the 24-70 f/2.8 Sigma Art lens. It’s a really good lens. In some tests I’ve seen it’s as sharp or slightly sharper than the GM.
Cameras like Canon 5D Mark ii can do the job. Why do we ask ourselves if the A7riii which is only a couple of years old is still capable?
That’s a great point. I think it’s largely because whenever a new camera comes out FOMO sets in for people and all of a sudden whatever you have “isn’t good enough” anymore.
I will say that while I agree older cameras can do the job, if money is not a huge barrier, I would most definitely recommend a mirrorless model vs DSLR. And it doesn’t have to be the latest and greatest either. Like the Sony a7R III.
@@Lee_Squire i do have DSRLs and i do have mirrorless, one of the best sensors on the A7Rii. For the professional photography either the OLD DSLRs or the mirrorless can do the job with no questions. What matters is the user. Now a good lens will definatelly makes your life easier. But at this point we are with the technology, a better and latest mirrorless camera wont help you enouph with the frame or resolution size we need in most of the photography applications. I'm a technology fan, on the otherside spending 3-4K every year for a camera gear i would better invest on a fast prime lenses.
@@astasuleo You're right. Definately depends on the user. And I totally agree about getting really good glass. It takes things to another level. You can always upgrade a body later.
Bro , I’ve recently found a Sony used Sony a7riii in excellent condition for around 1,400$ , with around 680 shots and no laser damage and no dead pixels, what do you think? Should I go with a not used Sony a7iii for around 1,200$? Or this a7riii is right for me to buy
I have A7IV and A7riii , I change my a7riii for a7riii for 100€ more with 12.000 shots and it's totally recomend the upgrade , better evf and screen, more mpx if you needed and it don't have the low pass filter so the photos looks more sharp but if you do video I still recommend you a7iii it have better AF , the a7riii it's not bad but a7iii have more coverage but anyway the are 2 great cameras, expend money in lenses because you will see more difference with good glasses than the camera.
That sounds like a decent deal. Just make sure you check it out to make sure everything works! Both are great cameras and will save you a bit of money. Personally I really like the RIII. The screen and evf is better. But it depends on your needs.
@@Lee_Squire TNX bro
hi, what is the dual native iso of this camera specially on slog3 pp?
Honestly, I'm not sure on this body. I have never seen anything about it on this one.
@@Lee_Squire i see maybe bcus theyre not cineline cameras. Anyway, I owned this body. Super satisfied with stills. 🤙🏽
@@jocolocography I love this camera it performs so well. Looking to upgrade later this year though.
The r3 was almost too gooe when it came out. Ive had mine since about a week after release...id like somenof the new ones but i dont need to upgrade yet. Even on DXOMark the R3's sensor is still like 4th or 5th place
Hey Jay thanks for the comment. Yeah I totally agree, I still haven't felt the need to upgrade yet. But I feel like I might upgrade to the RV or the a7IV next. Haven't decided.
@@Lee_Squire I have a7iv and a7riii , the a7iv its far superior in af and speed in menus,buffer , iso performance ,screen and evf but the a7riii its an incredible camera and I will keep it as second camera you can do almost everything than the a7iv in photography but for video its another story .
@@NAM3L3555 Got ya. Thanks for that bit of info. I am leaning towards the riv honestly. It seems like the perfect middle ground.
Going to be doing video in the street at night talking with people asking questions want other peoples opinions on a best camera
A7IV would be good for that if you’re looking for something hybrid for photo and video.
@@Lee_Squire what lens would be good for?
No hobbyist needs anything like the Riii. None. Get the Canon EOS RP as a hobbyist who does not make money with his camera. Who cares how sticky eye AF is if you’re a hobbyist?! C’mon mannn 🤪
Speak for yourself
@@tomd4748 I think it depends. You get a lot of quality with this camera. And with it being a bit older now you can save a lot on it. EOS RP is decent but I will say that the aye AF is amazing, hobbyist or not. What matters more long term is glass but since this video is about the camera body I have to disagree. Hobbyist also operate in different price ranges as well. So it’s all a personal decision.
@@me-rfc2024 sure, I guess if you really wanted to, you could eat a steady diet of shit sandwiches, too 🤡
@@Lee_Squire the 7R II was used professionally for years, so I’m 100% sure no hobbyist needs something better. Let’s see their portfolio, then they can show us why such hardware can’t keep up with them, so now they need 61 mpx, or global sensor lol come on.
They obsess on the ILC channels, convinced if only they can get their hands on a9Ii or better, they’ll become the next Tony Northrup. So, do they NEED more or do they simply WANT more? Obviously it’s the latter.
@@tomd4748 What a charming person you are….