I've listened to this full series multiple times and I feel this is the most important lecture. It's also one of the few audio sources discussing heidegger's turn. Everyone focuses on his verbiage (dasein, etc.) from before the turn and his involvement with the Nazis. The turn never gets discussed.
I feel that there's something gravely missing from Heidegger's characterisation of modern man. Putting aside the _errors_ of: enframing, nihilism, will to power, calculative thinking etc, he had (as far as I know) no explanation for Western society's dutiful complicity with the mainstream media's central messages, nor the public's unconscious loyalties to both: to the Occident's imperial war effort and deep-seated status quo. Even the supposedly enlightened lecturer here (like Heidegger himself) is conspicuously wearing an _inauthentic_ necktie; that I suspect both would deem criticism of which to be unworthy of serious consideration. As I believe Heidegger rightly propounded, one cannot fulfil their (human) potential as a manifestation of Being's truth, whist still wilfully _conforming_ to societal nonsense.
With regard to the impractical necktie, subscribers never discuss the issue; tending to answer sincere enquiry with ridicule. Nevertheless, there's a pretty obvious elitism that unites proponents.
@beingsshepherd man's beyond comprehension so I technically withdrew from that section in the world of daseins interpretation and its all reversed and the significant act that's the real at any point of view or not but is specific to his present sense terms as the significant relay of the mind and theory management in philosophy on my philosophy of the mind
The lectern may be "being". But not a living being. A lectern can t reveal itself to another lectern. Humanism is seeing, perceiving things from a human perspective. We cannot see things from the perspective of chimpanzees or a lectern. 🤔😎
I don't think Heidegger can, by his own ideas, come up with anything prescriptive. Why is pre-socratic idea of techne any superior that modern technology? Lol If there isn't any THE BEING, well then every being is equally real and equally superior to its dasien.
Such an awesome lecture!! It helped me to prepare for my PHD entrance test. Thanks from Brazil!!
Glad you liked it
I've listened to this full series multiple times and I feel this is the most important lecture. It's also one of the few audio sources discussing heidegger's turn. Everyone focuses on his verbiage (dasein, etc.) from before the turn and his involvement with the Nazis. The turn never gets discussed.
Me too. Professor Cahoone's course on the history of modern political theory is equally impressive and challenging.
@@xxcrysad3000xx it's a great course, no pun intended!
Wait I don't want this book to be humanist, deconstructs dasein...just leave it on the categories
Great learning experience - thanks.
Excellent lecture on a difficult thinker.
Muy Bien!
yess...
_what a fine brain you have_
Do you think Heidegger in a way became a modern western Neo-Zen master?
I feel that there's something gravely missing from Heidegger's characterisation of modern man.
Putting aside the _errors_ of: enframing, nihilism, will to power, calculative thinking etc, he had (as far as I know) no explanation for Western society's dutiful complicity with the mainstream media's central messages, nor the public's unconscious loyalties to both: to the Occident's imperial war effort and deep-seated status quo.
Even the supposedly enlightened lecturer here (like Heidegger himself) is conspicuously wearing an _inauthentic_ necktie; that I suspect both would deem criticism of which to be unworthy of serious consideration.
As I believe Heidegger rightly propounded, one cannot fulfil their (human) potential as a manifestation of Being's truth, whist still wilfully _conforming_ to societal nonsense.
With regard to the impractical necktie, subscribers never discuss the issue; tending to answer sincere enquiry with ridicule. Nevertheless, there's a pretty obvious elitism that unites proponents.
@@Impaled_Onion-thatsmine Depends on the company.
@beingsshepherd man's beyond comprehension so I technically withdrew from that section in the world of daseins interpretation and its all reversed and the significant act that's the real at any point of view or not but is specific to his present sense terms as the significant relay of the mind and theory management in philosophy on my philosophy of the mind
Do humans do the revealing or do the non humans do the revealing?
The lectern may be "being". But not a living being. A lectern can t reveal itself to another lectern. Humanism is seeing, perceiving things from a human perspective. We cannot see things from the perspective of chimpanzees or a lectern. 🤔😎
I don't think Heidegger can, by his own ideas, come up with anything prescriptive. Why is pre-socratic idea of techne any superior that modern technology? Lol If there isn't any THE BEING, well then every being is equally real and equally superior to its dasien.