The Lost Scottish City Of Roxburgh | Time Team | Timeline

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 เม.ย. 2021
  • Five-hundred years ago, a major city occupied what is now a large and empty field in the Scottish Borders. Founded by a king as a hub for international trade, Roxburgh was, along with Edinburgh, Stirling and Berwick, one of the four great centres of medieval Scotland. While the other three became thriving cities, Roxburgh simply vanished. Tony and the team have a unique chance to uncover whatever remains under the pasture.
    It's like Netflix for history... Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code 'TIMELINE' bit.ly/3a7ambu
    You can find more from us on:
    / timelinewh
    / timelinewh
    This channel is part of the History Hit Network. Any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com

ความคิดเห็น • 289

  • @lauriepenner350
    @lauriepenner350 3 ปีที่แล้ว +182

    This show has made some really great contributions to archaeology. If for no other reason than landowners finally letting archaeologists dig up their land if it means they get to be on TV.

    • @lauriepenner350
      @lauriepenner350 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Hey bots, stop botting up my comments.

    • @wendywhite2642
      @wendywhite2642 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yep Lauri thanks for your reply I checked that out myself and found out it was true and so I deleted that comment

    • @arescoleman5895
      @arescoleman5895 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I know it is quite off topic but does anyone know a good site to watch new movies online?

    • @arescoleman5895
      @arescoleman5895 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Crosby Cesar thank you, signed up and it seems like they got a lot of movies there :D I really appreciate it !

    • @cherry-vz5kx
      @cherry-vz5kx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@arescoleman5895 Try Pelispedia

  • @OrbitalAstronaut
    @OrbitalAstronaut 3 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    You guys always are so respectful to the sites you excavate. Its nice to see people who really love history doing their work.

  • @jdromero6902
    @jdromero6902 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I have learned more watching Timeline more than I had in college.

  • @batshit_for_ACME
    @batshit_for_ACME 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    I used to live in this region. My friends and I would often hike from town to peak to town, staying in B&Bs or campgrounds. Lots of options in this area, definitely worth a visit.

  • @marroosh9771
    @marroosh9771 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I will never ever grow tired of Time Team!

  • @patrickwentz8413
    @patrickwentz8413 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I love it when he says join us after the break and 2 seconds later the show is back on!

    • @p7outdoors297
      @p7outdoors297 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And no bumpers! Mark of an amazing show

    • @Mr2winners
      @Mr2winners 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A quick wee

  • @jeffreyarnold2626
    @jeffreyarnold2626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    with such an important history behind this area, it truly deserves a more thorough dig.

    • @bluelight9669
      @bluelight9669 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      thing is you can put a shovel in the ground almost anywhere in the british isles and hit arcology and since no one can sell what they find we are only seeing a sliver of what is available since this is one of the best programs. each show probably cost maybe 50K plus dollars for 3 days work. the government museum arcology money is put towards areas being rebuilt that has important finds that will be destroyed

    • @TheGotoGeek
      @TheGotoGeek 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@bluelight9669 Tony Robinson and Tim Taylor have said it was about 400k Sterling per episode, which is still fairly inexpensive as TV goes, but in an absolute sense not cheap. And then Channel 4 screwed around with them to the point where the ratings fell and canceled it. The production team is reviving it on Patreon under the name “Time Team Digital”, and they are planning to make more episodes without the interference of Channel 4. “It’s worth backing,” says the guy typing this while wearing Time Team fleece jacket.

  • @evensgrey
    @evensgrey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    One of the things that strikes me is how unusual it is that what was once a major center of commerce was entirely abandoned. Trade towns, and towns in general, are built where they are for a good reason and those tend to continue to be good reasons for towns to be there, so they tend to be there for a long time and get rebuilt if some disaster destroys them. Had this area stayed Scottish for a couple more centuries, which wouldn't have been difficult, it would have continued on as a major trade center until the Act of Union made it no longer really an issue which side of the border it was on.

    • @TemplarsWildFire
      @TemplarsWildFire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      To me, its like the Ghost Towns in the western United States. Huge towns (for their time) sprung up for the gold rush but when the gold ran out, the towns died. They're scattered all over the west, but in some places, they're basically gone. It only took a little over 100 years for the ground to reclaim them. It doesn't surprise me that this is what would be left after what, 800-900 years?

    • @armstronggermany2995
      @armstronggermany2995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It did stay Scottish, or am I mistaken ?

    • @evensgrey
      @evensgrey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@armstronggermany2995 It changed hands several time during the various wars between the Scots and the English. The town and castle were destroyed in a battle in 1460 when James II of Scotland tried to take it back from the English (the last English-held castle in Scotland) while the English were busy having the civil war known as The Wars of the Roses. This demonstrates just how bad early artillery could be in terms of area damage: Everything the battle was about trying to get control of, and the King of Scotland as well, wound up in small bits.

    • @jrmckim
      @jrmckim ปีที่แล้ว

      The oil field still does this in certain towns across North America. They find big pockets of gas/oil which brings an influx of people and business to these small towns. Then after 5 years the drilling is done and they move on.

  • @roninreturns228
    @roninreturns228 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    As a landowner, I'd be tempted to allow further exploration, provided that the parts that didn't yield good results were fully restored over the following year. With such a wealth of history, even given that short amount of time and meters to excavate, the site was revealing some fascinating finds.

    • @Summer_Snows
      @Summer_Snows 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem isn't just the landowner, but also that as a protected site there can only be a certain amount of work done on it within a time frame. It's very possible that Time Team's excavations here mean that it'll be years before another team can dig

    • @HappyBeezerStudios
      @HappyBeezerStudios 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Summer_Snows always makes me wonder why, especially with completely buried sites there isn't a larger, careful excavation to properly register all the stuff at the site.

    • @Summer_Snows
      @Summer_Snows 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @HappyBeezerStudios There's several reasons why we do our best to no longer excavate the entirety of sites
      For one, to bring the level of care that modern archaeology strives for, to dig an ENTIRE site takes an immense amount of time and manpower. Just look at Egypt, arguably the most thoroughly excavated place on Earth, and we're still making new finds. Take that and apply it to places that have had much less time to be dug, and you can see why it's a colossal undertaking
      Second, archaeology is a discipline that is constantly evolving, and removing the possibility for future in situ finds does more harm than good. New technology means we can make new discoveries only possible with undisturbed sites, but more importantly, the attitudes archaeologists bring to digs are always changing as well. While we can take thoroughly detailed notes on the dig (and sometimes have to for sites that are in danger), there's no replacing the actual discovery and physical placement of artifacts.

  • @IKEMENOsakaman
    @IKEMENOsakaman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Scotland is a country full of wonders

    • @Odo55
      @Odo55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Pistol Pete Yeah- Look at me❗ look at me❗ I'm a Disney character😖

  • @blackbird5634
    @blackbird5634 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Two three years of watching Time Team and I cannot look at dirt the same way ever again. That being said I can't tell the damn difference between one kind of dirt and another, but I look at it differently. And I keep scratching my head.

    • @bradmiller2329
      @bradmiller2329 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Colour and texture are the first two things to look for.

  • @kathywolf4558
    @kathywolf4558 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    It is really a shame these sites cannot be further investigated with a week or more of exploration.

    • @granthurlburt4062
      @granthurlburt4062 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      There isnt the funding. Wo. time Team, there wouldnt be these preliminary investigations which can be followed up by longer-term project. BEcause T.T are professionals, they follow professional procedures and keep careful records that can be used by later, costly projects.

    • @parkerw.2155
      @parkerw.2155 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@granthurlburt4062 they don't follow professional human grooming etiquette though 40:24

  • @granthurlburt4062
    @granthurlburt4062 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Personally, the presenter of Time Line seems an empty-headed TV presenter. It just shows one reason why Time Team was so good.Tony Robinson ws so good - he is somehow matey, and also humourous, and also seems genuine, while the Time Line guy is almost laughably inauthentic but conventionally handsome. No one would cll the Time Team men conventionally handsome!

    • @richardgrace4500
      @richardgrace4500 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tony Robinson was sooooo annoying and obnoxious... new absolutely zero about what he was doing or talking about and was/is a lifelong paid actor... he also has the most amazing level of disrespect and irreverence for burials/graves I have ever seen in my life and always wants to just “yank” stuff out of the ground... on top of all of that he is always talking about and worried about and focused on “firsts” and “making history” and “never before found”... they could have easily found an actual archeologist or historian to be the narrator for the show instead of some paid actor who knows absolutely nothing

    • @marilyncuaron3222
      @marilyncuaron3222 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Poor Richard Grace. He'll go to his grave wondering why Sir Tony is so popular with the audience. Chin up, Richard! You needn't watch if Tony makes you unhappy. .

  • @gregkerr725
    @gregkerr725 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I am an American with the last name of Kerr. According to my clan history the Roxburgh area was my clan's stomping area. Very intersting.

    • @user-if3cm6qo1w
      @user-if3cm6qo1w 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same here

    • @varalderfreyr8438
      @varalderfreyr8438 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Duke of Roxburghe, whose castle is shown from a distance and who owns the land which the time team are digging on here, he is a Kerr.

  • @claudettedelphis6476
    @claudettedelphis6476 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Absolutely fantastic to follow your search 🦋🦄
    Thank you for inviting us along and good luck 👍🍀

  • @gullrock14
    @gullrock14 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    This is the original reality show. “Will we answer all the questions in 3 days?” “Is geophysics new gear better than digging?”

    • @wendywhite2642
      @wendywhite2642 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I sure hope you realize that this history hit TV / timeline group has absolutely no relationship to the Time Team group who created these videos. They have simply commandeered this content to make money off the advertising.

    • @cynthiatolman326
      @cynthiatolman326 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wendywhite2642 Your response confused me. I've only seen about 3 of these.

    • @karmaarmstrong6175
      @karmaarmstrong6175 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thats so funny you say that cuz i just saw an episode called "keeping up with the gregorians" lmao

    • @joanneclarke771
      @joanneclarke771 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, but it is quicker.

  • @ZytphenA
    @ZytphenA 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This should have been named ‘3 nights at the roxburgh’

  • @jimneedham4640
    @jimneedham4640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    how an entire CITY can just disappear even knowing why is chilling.

    • @hopelewis5650
      @hopelewis5650 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Probably flooding

    • @quackaddict2203
      @quackaddict2203 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I second flooding. There's still habitation in the area as we can see. It's just further from the river in most places.

    • @varalderfreyr8438
      @varalderfreyr8438 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The burghe was destroyed by Mary of Guelders in 1460

  • @chris...9497
    @chris...9497 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Speaking as an American who's had just the one visit to the UK, I think those not native to the UK have no grasp what the importance of nettles might be.
    Visiting a small stone circle at a roadside, I innocently encountered nettles brushing gently against my bare legs.
    Within a half-hour, it was burning & painful, and discomfort continued for days.
    Standing nettles are a big deal. People should appreciate what is being asked of those who have to survey, fieldwalk, or dig in proximity to them.

    • @CaptainAMAZINGGG
      @CaptainAMAZINGGG 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It stinging happens right away for me. However, if you rub dock leaf on the area, it eases it and for me, is fine pretty fast. Just a bit uncomfortable. Nothing big tho. And I'm basically allergic to everything, so am super sensitive. My skin sucks.
      If you ever go back, remember the dock leaves lol. They're always near nettles. ;)

    • @aprilstevens6498
      @aprilstevens6498 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We have nettles in Pennsylvania.

    • @danielrowsey7667
      @danielrowsey7667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We have nettles in Alaska. They’re delicious.

    • @notsure5698
      @notsure5698 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      🤣city slickers... buwhahaha

    • @julienelson6506
      @julienelson6506 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      and California... you quickly learn which fields not to play in as a child

  • @earlmcdaniel1607
    @earlmcdaniel1607 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I hope they continue with the archeology to find out more about the history of the town.

  • @altheacraig2904
    @altheacraig2904 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am descended from my great-grandmother Janet Thain who was born in Rathven, Banffshire Scotland, and great-great-grandfather James and great-great-grandmother Mary Sim of Perthshire. I do not yet know the city. I very much enjoy hearing anything about my ancestral home!

  • @ArcticBreaze
    @ArcticBreaze 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Solved. I found Roxburgh , it got up and moved to central Otago, New Zealand. lol

    • @michaelwaynemartin3291
      @michaelwaynemartin3291 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I lived in Stirling, about an hour toward the coast.

    • @aaronleverton4221
      @aaronleverton4221 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah, he's an actor in Australia, was a henchman in Mission Impossible 2.

    • @bazza945
      @bazza945 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, I briefly lived there circa 1950.

  • @Mote.
    @Mote. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is so fun. Lovely video. I havent even watched the full thing yet but its great so far

  • @bobgillis1137
    @bobgillis1137 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Fascinating, especially the carved arch keystone. I wonder where all the soil covering the site came from. Is it just progressive accumulation of organics and wind-blown dirt ?

    • @bradmiller2329
      @bradmiller2329 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Probably. Throw in a little flooding, multiply by a few hundred years ...

  • @t.7721
    @t.7721 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I friggin love Timeline and TimeTeam!

  • @deborahfielder5644
    @deborahfielder5644 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Phil has tge most beautiful smile

  • @corkycobon1481
    @corkycobon1481 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I feel sorry for John sometimes. Geophysing in nettles has really gotta suck!!

    • @TechGorilla1987
      @TechGorilla1987 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Prickly predicament, indeed.

    • @ledacedar6253
      @ledacedar6253 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      but I love it; Tony illuminates conflict for viewers engagement while John & Stuart argue their expert opinions & yet it's nettles that challenge the most. I love em...Eat Them, make tea with them Best wild veggie

    • @Johan-vk5yd
      @Johan-vk5yd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ledacedar6253 ”Urtica” Letting them infuse for several days provides for a smashing fertilizing liquid too!

  • @joshuahernandez3216
    @joshuahernandez3216 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm an American that really enjoys your channel, mate.

  • @sarahwithanhyouheathen3210
    @sarahwithanhyouheathen3210 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You can tell how buff Phil is in this particular episode lol

  • @bazza945
    @bazza945 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I lived in Roxburgh and related Roxburgh-Hydro, as a child. Not the Scottish original, but the townships in Otago, South Island, New Zealand. That was the early 1950s. We celebrated the Queen's Coronation at The Hydro, 1953.

    • @katerinakemp5701
      @katerinakemp5701 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Lol yes had the sweetest apricots there. Hi 👋 kiwi.

    • @wewenang5167
      @wewenang5167 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      how is the duke? Is he as snobby as what the time team said? What is wrong with him not allowing people to dig...lol

  • @lazaruskarl2629
    @lazaruskarl2629 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Greeting from Sarawak..💚

  • @virginiamartin9913
    @virginiamartin9913 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great again as usual !

  • @fionaanderson5796
    @fionaanderson5796 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What puzzles me is why that big church would have been built OUTSIDE the protection of the town walls. Churches were usually fairly central.

  • @mnichols1979
    @mnichols1979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love how John sounds like Ringo.

    • @evanz2704
      @evanz2704 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And Paul like George.

  • @mikerotch4597
    @mikerotch4597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Scotland is where my family originated from very interesting

  • @marcaubin6091
    @marcaubin6091 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a good show!

  • @annihull6373
    @annihull6373 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks!

  • @AnnaAnna-uc2ff
    @AnnaAnna-uc2ff 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @HonestHuck777
    @HonestHuck777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow they found the church! amazing

  • @HonestHuck777
    @HonestHuck777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    great britain is definitely an awesome place to be an archaeologist (and or student)

  • @EastyyBlogspot
    @EastyyBlogspot ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I do get a bit frustrated with Scheduled ancient monument restrictions.....I can understand in many cases but often having watched Time team some of the sites hardly anything is known and often seems they jump to schedule sites without knowing that much about them

  • @maureenhannivan8043
    @maureenhannivan8043 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So cool

  • @choppareed6595
    @choppareed6595 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love this 🤙🍻🇳🇿👊

  • @festivitycat
    @festivitycat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Map at 6:00 puts Edinburgh somewhere in South Perthshire ...

    • @anthonylambert4523
      @anthonylambert4523 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was just going to write the very same thing !!

  • @carolhofhine560
    @carolhofhine560 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    So what happens after 3 days? Do they just record their findings, and then bury everything back up?

    • @tessjuel
      @tessjuel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It differs. Some finds are sent to various museums, others are put back in place so that future archaeologists with (hopefully) better background info and technology can re-evaluate them.

    • @manaboutit1594
      @manaboutit1594 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A number of TT sites have been further dug and worked.
      Their Facebook page has a number of links to explore.
      A few of the expanded digs have yielded very nice finds.

  • @Mote.
    @Mote. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The guys boots look cool. The magnetic apparatus the two girls are carrying. 👍🏻And the one guy's dragonball shirt

  • @HonestHuck777
    @HonestHuck777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    dang? archaeologists are AMAZING

  • @budrupe1877
    @budrupe1877 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    From what I can see on a map the community of Kelso, Scotland is only about 2 miles, 3.2 km away. What is the correlation between Kelso, neighboring communities and that archaeological site. There must be something in the historical documents of that area. Perhaps as the local communities evolved the lesser of and least productive was slowly abandoned.
    We have many small little populated areas and Villages that were thriving + - 100 years ago in United States that are nothing but points on a map nowadays. Many of these started out as homesteads and nearby villages but as properties were sold and land Holdings became larger the current population dispersed for whatever reason. One of the ways that you can determine the locations of old homestead sites is ivy growing on an old tree and other anomalies that would not occur naturally in nature. There are many one-room schools scattered across America still today that supported thriving small communities that don't seem to exist today.

  • @caughtthefevermagnetfishin3992
    @caughtthefevermagnetfishin3992 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've been watching episode after episode, had two surgeries in two months, so I have had plenty of time, I've learned alot, and I think I'm in love with Tony, really what's not to love, LOL.
    I wish I had know about it before now, But I'm in the States, so there you have it.. Keep it up guys....XOX to Tony...

  • @l7846
    @l7846 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WHAT IS THAT HAUNTING MUSIC? The theme music?? Please tell. It is perfect for this series...

  • @johnhagemeyer8578
    @johnhagemeyer8578 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Philomath Oregon says HELLO , we love T.T.

  • @channel_archistoriac
    @channel_archistoriac 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful but Poor Mary! I hope the system is not heavy for her shoulders.

  • @reneesotelo4929
    @reneesotelo4929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Would love for you guys to be able to spend at least a few months to a year to study the area better.

    • @Fush1234
      @Fush1234 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      5 years ago.. when he was alive. 🤪🤪

    • @fairwitness7473
      @fairwitness7473 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Fush1234 I didn't know he died.. 😥

    • @Fush1234
      @Fush1234 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fairwitness7473 - brain hemorrhage. 62 years.

  • @mikehartman5326
    @mikehartman5326 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It would be a great deed to allow further site exploration in the name of history.

  • @gathererofmagic5350
    @gathererofmagic5350 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What season of time team was this?

    • @tessjuel
      @tessjuel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Season 11, Episode 12. Ummm... you can simply look this up on Google you know. ;-)

  • @tonylittle3508
    @tonylittle3508 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It is amazing that a place like this could be abandoned just 500 years ago, and there is no historical documentation of the reason. I am not sure that the hypothesis put forward that it was related to loss of access to the port would be the full story, does not quite add up. I have a family link to Roxburghshire. I am wondering if it could have been destroyed at some stage being caught up in border clashes? Still, it is astonishing that there is no further historical record.

    • @tonylittle3508
      @tonylittle3508 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      According to one source, after being fought over many times, it was taken over by the English for about 100 years, and recaptured in 1460, by which time the town and church were just a pile of rubble.

    • @tonylittle3508
      @tonylittle3508 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I would propose another theory in addition to my previous comments, that the English reduced this town to rubble to "send a message" to the rest of Scotland. It's location & importance would make it the first strategic target, it's destruction could be seen as psychological warfare.

    • @Odo55
      @Odo55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@tonylittle3508 I agree

    • @triciasomogyi5431
      @triciasomogyi5431 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tony Little -
      Sounds likely.

  • @chipthomas4169
    @chipthomas4169 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where in the British Isles is Phil Harding native to? His accent is something else.

    • @katerinakemp5701
      @katerinakemp5701 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wiltshire, but he now resides in Salisbury at the mo he is doing a vid about Salisbury Stonehenge and the surrounding area.

  • @trevorsinclair3425
    @trevorsinclair3425 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Does anyone know if Bridget is from New Zealand? I noticed her helmet had NZ1 on it plus it looks like she is wearing a Pounamu.

    • @kiwibird8441
      @kiwibird8441 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes

    • @katerinakemp5701
      @katerinakemp5701 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep her and her husband Raysan and kids live in Waihi. Trust a kiwi to wear a kiwi brand🤣🤣🤣

  • @RobbyHouseIV
    @RobbyHouseIV 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could someone over in Britain petition the government to ban further use of Dan Snow's History Hit advertisements that precedes so many of these Timeline videos? Thanks, you're a peach!

  • @dawnpeterson1269
    @dawnpeterson1269 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My 3rd g. Grandfather was from Roxburghshire, would this be the same city?

  • @danielcadwell9812
    @danielcadwell9812 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I live in Kelso, Washington founded by Peter Crawford of Kelso, Scotland.

  • @julienelson6506
    @julienelson6506 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am curious what happens to everything once you dig it up? Surely you do not just leave it exposed. Is it removed from the bulk of what is remaining or reburied?

  • @hopelewis5650
    @hopelewis5650 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the bits in the tree roots?

  • @roryross3878
    @roryross3878 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What's with the square meter limit? Landowner allowing only some legal requirement?

    • @georgedorn1022
      @georgedorn1022 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The site is a Scheduled Monument. Excavation is limited in order to preserve it for the future when it can be better understood.

  • @michelemcneill3652
    @michelemcneill3652 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love to hear some names.

  • @marcusjohnbondurajr
    @marcusjohnbondurajr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Them bangs are so yesteryear also

    • @katerinakemp5701
      @katerinakemp5701 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol considering this episode was made 2003 aired 2004 bangs were still the order of the day.

  • @antoineregis1976
    @antoineregis1976 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    24:18 guys please what's that music? I love it

    • @tessjuel
      @tessjuel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh yes, it's a lovely theme. I can't find it at any online tune finder so I suppose it was originally written for Time Team which should mean it's by Steve Day. I'm not sure if that helps but let us know if you find out more!

    • @alleeum
      @alleeum ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s one of the Time Team themes. They use them more extensively in the early episodes.

  • @marcusjohnbondurajr
    @marcusjohnbondurajr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I truly do not understand why they don’t have geophysics go a day or two before the rest do you have the whole site for most of it done on day one instead of afternoon day three when they don’t even have time to check any of it

    • @Du-Masses
      @Du-Masses 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I remember them doing that in some of the later episodes.

  • @drunkenobservations7483
    @drunkenobservations7483 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry guys. Absolutely love your videos, and hope you keep high access on youtube, but last thing I need is another subscription especially in such a nich area

  • @mickeyfilmer5551
    @mickeyfilmer5551 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    An Iconic British programmemade in the UK for the British viewing public, but not available to watch on TH-cam in the UK (Except I used my vpn to watch it from a USA server. What utter nonsense to forbid people in the UK to watch History of their own country. Damn poor show World History Documentaries- oh and I use an adblocker as well.

    • @speez6106
      @speez6106 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wish I had a whine blocker.

    • @leechowning2712
      @leechowning2712 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      BBC is still pretty attached to their TV licenses. The PBS here in the USA is about the same because their shows are funded by fundraising cycles every 3 months or so. The BBC is funded over half by grants, and if they don't limit access they are concerned they couldn't raise the funds for future programming... Which is a fair worry seeing as so many channels have gone to trash programing, and without these older shows we would not be supporting them at all.

  • @mercedes523
    @mercedes523 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A remarkable amount of us YANK’s genealogy is traced right back to Scotland.

  • @darkwaterlythops
    @darkwaterlythops 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The location of Edinburgh on the map about 6 minutes in? Weird.

  • @shieldsjohnjr
    @shieldsjohnjr ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Having a deadline of 3 days hardly seems like you can even set your site up let alone make sense of what you find.

    • @Libbathegreat
      @Libbathegreat ปีที่แล้ว

      That's the challenge and why this makes a good TV program. Most of the time on a dig, you don't have all the experts and specialists on site at once to discover and interpret things in real time. The fact they're all there arguing together probably yields better results.

    • @rafael_lana
      @rafael_lana 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Libbathegreatit's definitely not 3 days, that's the "gimmick" production comes with to create a sense of urgency. Sometimes the ditches go ballistic in a few hours, which wouldn't be possible with careful digging

    • @Libbathegreat
      @Libbathegreat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rafael_lana it *is* possible when you're taking off maybe a meter or more of topsoil with a mechanical digger in the first couple of hours. Most digs I've been on they don't do that so it took 3 days just to get through the topsoil, which in an agricultural area is kind of a waste really. I do know that on TT, sometimes they'd have some geophysics already done and they've pretty well decided on a plan before they get there, but the plan usually got thrown out halfway through day one 😄

    • @rafael_lana
      @rafael_lana 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Libbathegreat also sometimes they have 3D models of what they found like hours after it, back in the day that took much more time. Judging by the computers I would say late 90s, early 2000s.

    • @Libbathegreat
      @Libbathegreat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rafael_lana Yeah show ran from 2003-2013 roughly. They had a whole graphics department working flat out though during the dig. You normally only see one but there were usually at least 4 or 5 (during the live digs probably more). And of course a lot of reconstructions (like the pots) are rendered in post.

  • @averydizzle
    @averydizzle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why was such an important church set outside the towns defenses??

  • @michaelwoods4495
    @michaelwoods4495 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've wondered--why are so many old sited buried? Is dirt falling from space, enlarging the earth and burying ancient sites? It's curious...

    • @kuzzbillington6392
      @kuzzbillington6392 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Dusty winds + foilage growing and dying for hundreds/thousands of years. And sometimes man moving dirt to cover old stuff for farmland, building new stuff and whatnot. And repeat.

  • @danidu85
    @danidu85 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love these videos. My question is though, why do you only have 3 days?

    • @joanneclarke771
      @joanneclarke771 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The 3 day limit is for tension, keeps down personnel and rented equip costs. The Time Team group must move on to next week’s site pretty quick. But university archeology students probably continue the digs on the more promising sites.

    • @katerinakemp5701
      @katerinakemp5701 ปีที่แล้ว

      All the archeologists on these digs are employed full-time at various universities, some of the experts work for Heritage Trust, Scottish Museum as in this excavation, or are involved in their own longtime digs. TT do the exploratory excavations any other work will be carried on by others if warranted.

  • @dannyfubar3099
    @dannyfubar3099 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who knew calculating square footage was so difficult.

  • @ebrum7704
    @ebrum7704 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    ELI5 - Can someone explain to me why they seem to always allow just, what seems to me to be (a minimal), a limited amount of square meters to trench.

    • @georgedorn1022
      @georgedorn1022 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      To ensure that a highly significant site is mostly preserved for the future when archaeologists will better understand it.

  • @Patrick_Cooper
    @Patrick_Cooper ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When Tony says at about 4:55 "florescence light tubes". I don't know how he didn't see the complete irony in that statement, given the young ladies florescence hair color. A lost opportunity for a joke. I always thought Tony got his start with comedy... Corenza mentions 1313 AD, isn't that the year of the signing of the Magna Carta. College is many years back, so please forgive me for not remembering, and being so lazy I don't even want to "google" it...

    • @AnnaAnna-uc2ff
      @AnnaAnna-uc2ff 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      His use of the word "florescent" *was* the joke.
      You missed it.

    • @Patrick_Cooper
      @Patrick_Cooper 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No not really, I just like to post comments that ask questions, Now what about the Magna Carta?@@AnnaAnna-uc2ff

  • @RobKoelman
    @RobKoelman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    31:18 The location of the church is shown lying OUTSIDE the main defensive wall. Doesn't makes sense to me...

    • @suburbanbanshee
      @suburbanbanshee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Some churches would be built outside the walls, because it was easier to bury bodies and because there were often inns, etc., catering to travelers who didn't make it inside the gates at night, or wanted to stay cheaper.

    • @suburbanbanshee
      @suburbanbanshee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Also, if a monastery or bishop had lands outside the wall, you'd build a church on the lands you owned.

    • @amygodward4472
      @amygodward4472 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quite often, in larger towns, there would be two churches - one for the higher ground within the walls and one basic church just outside. Whether this resulted in a class division for the attendants of the churches - merchants and nobles who would live within the walls going to their local church and tanners and farmers going to the exterior church...I don't know

  • @scheralgreider5406
    @scheralgreider5406 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Scotland, home to some of my ancestors.

  • @DVineMe
    @DVineMe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    19:47 Lol in my city they thought the French were attacking at night so they opened fire... The next morning all the cows in the pasture opposite the city wall were found to have misteriously died during the night... 😂

  • @lynneproudfoot3624
    @lynneproudfoot3624 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does the team ever get an opportunity to
    Excavate a large sight an extra 3 days?

  • @brucegibbins3792
    @brucegibbins3792 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where is it? Roxburgh has been relocated to Te Wai Punamu in Aotearoa New Zealand.

  • @Arcboltkonrad13
    @Arcboltkonrad13 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    500th like

  • @armstronggermany2995
    @armstronggermany2995 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well their map showed Edinburgh where stirling roughly is.. and not south of the Forth.

  • @cheetah6881
    @cheetah6881 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's Baldrick, isn't it?

  • @philipmalaby8172
    @philipmalaby8172 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about Selkirk and Peebles?

  • @mhpupacios
    @mhpupacios 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sound drops out

  • @rainleistone9349
    @rainleistone9349 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    why at 48:09 would the church be outside the defense wall?

  • @MarcodeBoer
    @MarcodeBoer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which episode is this?

    • @AnnaAnna-uc2ff
      @AnnaAnna-uc2ff 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Series 11 Episode 12, 21 March 2004.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Time_Team_episodes

  • @abydos7775
    @abydos7775 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    6:08 That is not where Edinburgh or Perth are at all. Miles off...

  • @raindropsneverfall
    @raindropsneverfall 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How old is this documentary?

    • @tessjuel
      @tessjuel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Recorded in 2004, first aired 2005.

    • @georgedorn1022
      @georgedorn1022 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The excavation took place in June 2003 and the episode was first broadcast on 21st March 2004.

  • @whattowatchrightnow
    @whattowatchrightnow 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    what are they using to scan the earth? the geo-phys?

  • @sebastianmaharg
    @sebastianmaharg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They don't adequately explain how or when the city was effectively razed and cleared of all its rubble. It stands to reason that an entire town and its buildings don't simply "melt" into the ground.

    • @bradmiller2329
      @bradmiller2329 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Everybody in the area started mining it for pre-fab materials.

    • @katerinakemp5701
      @katerinakemp5701 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is a scheduled area, so they can only dig a certain area, anything outside the scheduled area can be dug. TT does exploratory investigative work, full reports are written up can be viewed for all TT digs go to Wessex Archeology.

  • @HelenTudor-Douglas
    @HelenTudor-Douglas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How can I get hired to work on these digs for Timeline? I'd work for FREE. Plus, I'm part Scottish. My Scottish DNA Brain could surely help guide them, I'd be an asset to the team.

    • @tessjuel
      @tessjuel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Timeline doesn't do digs. They don't do videos either actually, they buy them from different production teams just like TV channels do. But if you mean *Time Team*, they're starting up again these days and they've certainly used unpaid volunteers in the past. There's not much chance but there's no harm asking them. Contact info at their website, timeteamdigital.com
      Oh, and they're Pateron financed now since Channel 4 is out of the picture so there's always a way for anybody to support them if they want to.

    • @HelenTudor-Douglas
      @HelenTudor-Douglas 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tessjuel Yes, I meant Time Team. : ) How do I find them? Do you know?

    • @sophieh8468
      @sophieh8468 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@HelenTudor-Douglas they have a website and are on Instagram and Patreon. And the best part? No lie - they're coming back!!!!!

  • @jasper7072
    @jasper7072 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is there a timeframe of just a few days? I mean; I can understand the m2 part, but usually, these type of areas seem to be unused for large amounts of time per year.

    • @bradmiller2329
      @bradmiller2329 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cost of keeping the team on site, fed, sheltered, equipment maintenance, etc, etc.

  • @richardroxburgh2984
    @richardroxburgh2984 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think that’s were my ancestors are from

  • @xterminator8514
    @xterminator8514 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m not sure why anyone would take on such a historical site with only three days to work with. You don’t even get started and it’s over 🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️

  • @thomaskeil1437
    @thomaskeil1437 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    As much as I enjoy this series, I'm often frustrated and confused by the time-crunch as a factor. Archeological investigations, if thorough, require time, funding and workers. A three-day process simply isn't realistic if the intended possible discoveries are rushed to incomplete findings.

    • @granthurlburt4062
      @granthurlburt4062 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      There isnt the funding for the long-term projects that would be required to investigate every timie site. Wo. time Team, there wouldnt be these preliminary investigations of these numerous and previously unexplored suites. Time Team has enormously increased public appreciation of archaeology which is likely to result in more funding. BEcause T.T are professionals, they follow professional procedures and keep careful records that can be used by later, costly projects.

    • @granthurlburt4062
      @granthurlburt4062 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The Time Team archaeologists are actually working for free (at least Mick Aston was) on weekends. Obviously Tony and the BBC crews were paid. That is another reason they were limited to three days. Exploratory archaeology is very important. some professional archaeologists were quite sniffy about the three-day structure initially, but I imagine they are very happy now to be featured on Alice Robert's shows. If you watch those, notice how weary the archaeologists are. The banter among the T Time methods exists because they're full of excitement at exposing brand new things and speculating.

    • @megelizabeth9492
      @megelizabeth9492 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      From what I can tell, most of the people involved were basically doing this as a hobby over three day weekends, and did have actual university jobs.

    • @HannibalFan52
      @HannibalFan52 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      These exploratory digs are useful. They can help English Heritage and other such agencies decide whether or not it's worth investing their limited funds and personnel into deeper exploration of any given site for more detailed, longer term digs, rather than wasting time and resources on sites that don't turn up much in the long run.