Donnerwetter, der ist mit seinen 71 PS ja fast genauso schnell wie der Mazda 2 Hybrid 90 PS. Und neben bei hat der Mitsubishi sogar die besseren Verbrauchswerte, als der Mazda 2 Hybrid. Das hätte ich nicht erwartet. Mitsubishi hat hier mit ergingen Aufwand ein preiswertes verbrauchsarmes Auto auf die Räder gestellt. Respekt für Mitsubishi.
@MobileGME I emailed the dealer and he said they only had one in and that it was not available to drive as I would get it dirty!!!! I bought a Renault scenic instead!
@@tonybarton1516 Ja was für ein Beschiss. Der Mazda 2 Hybrid (90PS) Verbraucht mehr und ist in Klasse A eingestuft. Die Marke Mitsubishi wird eindeutig diskriminiert.
Der Wert stimmt nicht, die Meßstrecke ist zu kurz, zumal der Bordcomputer des Mitsubishi Space Star nur alle 30 Sekunden aktualisiert. Etwa 3,5 Liter sind bei Tacho 80 eher realistisch.
Good test, thank you ! Can't believe I hated this car when I saw it for the first time in 2015. Now I plan on buying one for its fuel efficiency and its design. I like the fact that it is a very light car and that is one of the most aerodynamic if not the most of its category. And I love the new LED tail lights !
Are you sure this is the 1.193 cc with 71 PS (52 KW) and not with 80 PS (59 KW)? I live in Greece and willing to buy one. I searched the web and there are a only couple reports that this engine is 71 PS. Just wondering..., The engine type is 3A92? Perfect presentation, no words to say!!!!😉
Mitsubishi lowered the output from 80 hp to 71 hp I think in 2020 to comply with new environmental regulations on air pollution. They probably changed the camshaft profile for more overlap and thus cooler temperatures during combustion (less NOx).
Was für ein Beschiss und was für eine Diskrimierung von Mitsubishi. Der Mazda 2 Hybrid verbraucht mehr und wird in die Effizienz Klasse A eingestuft, der Mitsubishi verbraucht weniger und ist in der Klasse C.
Mir gefällt der in diesem Gelb und in Anthrazit. Die Schwarzen Leichtmetallfelgen kommen extrem gut! Ich fahr das 2020er 1.0 L Basismodell in Weiss. Bin froh, dass ich vergangenen November überhaupt noch so einen bekommen habe, auch noch für 7.360,- € neu!
@@martinstahle2006 ist nur theoretisch möglich, da musst du ganze strecke immer in 80 kmh fahren und möglichst nur flach, auch nie bremsen und so. das ist möglich aber so nah bei 1460 km reichweite ist sehr schwierig zu erreichen, aber 1000-1300 km ist mehr möglich wenn du immer 80 kmh zb quer durch deutschland reist :)
The key to the whole Mitsubishi Mirage……………5spd. Period. F the cvt. It ruins the poor little car. So if you don’t know how to drive a five speed don’t buy one or buy one and learn how to drive stick
What kind of engine? Diesel? Actually this mitsubishi is at top 10 lowest consumption we ever had tested. Many cars even newer audi a3 are higher than this space star, but the new audi a3 2.0 tdi has similiar or lower fuel like this space star
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK 20 valve 2.0l NA petrol engine, above 80kmh I get similar mileage. And my car weights almost 1500kg wet. These new cars are efficient at really low speed since they don't weigh much.
@@ardmrad9278 yeah but you must watch the rpm and transmission at small car, it has always higher rpm than bigger engines, even my 3.6 V6 pentastar has 1500 rpm at 120 kmh and consume 6.5-7 liter at 100 km
You know just one poetry, do you? Consumption below 10 l/100 km at almost top speed is very good. You should be banned from commenting about cars, maybe you know something else better.
@@Seba03111976 others have less consumption at that speed and on their top one!! top speed of this car could be 100kmh too but it want be good again if consumption will be 10 liters!!
@@Mr11ESSE111 Again, you assume people buying this car are sitting at 160kph all day long on a German autobahn? No. I doubt 99.99% of these things will ever see above 120kph. If you're going to base your verdicts of cars on consumption at arbitrary speeds, just you wait when you start factoring in other things. You'll think cars are some hellspawn creature sent out to steal our money (tbh not far from the truth).
@@Mr11ESSE111 I drive in the Netherlands, never aboven 100 km/h (not allowed faster). My average consumption over 130.000 km is 4.2 l/100 km. That is good. And by the way 10l per 100 km at top speed is also good. Not many cars do 10l/100km at 160 km/h.
![ปฏิเสธไม่ไหว (Crush on you) - LIPTA feat. No One Else [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NBw1jF342vw/mqdefault.jpg)
Donnerwetter, der ist mit seinen 71 PS ja fast genauso schnell wie der Mazda 2 Hybrid 90 PS.
Und neben bei hat der Mitsubishi sogar die besseren Verbrauchswerte, als der Mazda 2 Hybrid. Das hätte ich nicht erwartet.
Mitsubishi hat hier mit ergingen Aufwand ein preiswertes verbrauchsarmes Auto auf die Räder gestellt. Respekt für Mitsubishi.
This tells me all the useful information I want. Thank you for this! I have just booked a test drive.
How was it?
@MobileGME I emailed the dealer and he said they only had one in and that it was not available to drive as I would get it dirty!!!! I bought a Renault scenic instead!
Excelent video, without trash talk.
At 80 kmph:
"Oh, it looks like there's few ml of petrol in my lighter. Im going to the moon and back with it"
2,4 liter bei 80 kmh - wow!
Und Effizienzklasse C....
@@tonybarton1516
Ja was für ein Beschiss. Der Mazda 2 Hybrid (90PS) Verbraucht mehr und ist in Klasse A eingestuft.
Die Marke Mitsubishi wird eindeutig diskriminiert.
Der Wert stimmt nicht, die Meßstrecke ist zu kurz, zumal der Bordcomputer des Mitsubishi Space Star nur alle 30 Sekunden aktualisiert. Etwa 3,5 Liter sind bei Tacho 80 eher realistisch.
Good test, thank you ! Can't believe I hated this car when I saw it for the first time in 2015. Now I plan on buying one for its fuel efficiency and its design. I like the fact that it is a very light car and that is one of the most aerodynamic if not the most of its category. And I love the new LED tail lights !
Really liked the way you measured the consumption, this what i’am looking for 👏👏👏👏👏👏 thx
Am cu parat și eu una dar nu are scut la motor știe cineva asa vin din fabica
You certainly stand out with your silent vids. Good job!
The narrative is fascinating!
very nice and reliable little car
Good video. Testing a Citroën C1, Peugeot 108 or Toyota Aygo, please.
perfect test video
Are you sure this is the 1.193 cc with 71 PS (52 KW) and not with 80 PS (59 KW)? I live in Greece and willing to buy one. I searched the web and there are a only couple reports that this engine is 71 PS. Just wondering..., The engine type is 3A92?
Perfect presentation, no words to say!!!!😉
Mitsubishi lowered the output from 80 hp to 71 hp I think in 2020 to comply with new environmental regulations on air pollution. They probably changed the camshaft profile for more overlap and thus cooler temperatures during combustion (less NOx).
Simply the best!
Nice, thanks for the video
only where and how it shows the engine temperature
Start/stop button on the left side of a steering wheel? Unusual.
Not for a left hander.Saw a push start on the right. I though that was unusual.
@@stevensmith8648 I haven't thought about that, sorry.
The consumption at 80 km/h is about 1 l/100 km higher in the reality.
Very good review
Was für ein Beschiss und was für eine Diskrimierung von Mitsubishi.
Der Mazda 2 Hybrid verbraucht mehr und wird in die Effizienz Klasse A eingestuft, der Mitsubishi verbraucht weniger und ist in der Klasse C.
its the ev bullcrap
Wie heisst die Lackierung? Sieht gut aus
Lackierung heisst Citrin-Gelb Metallic, gefällt mir auch persönlich sehr :)
Super, danke
Mir gefällt der in diesem Gelb und in Anthrazit. Die Schwarzen Leichtmetallfelgen kommen extrem gut! Ich fahr das 2020er 1.0 L Basismodell in Weiss. Bin froh, dass ich vergangenen November überhaupt noch so einen bekommen habe, auch noch für 7.360,- € neu!
Is this basically a Mitsubishi Mirage?
YES
Nice, well equipped, reliable as MMC used to be but I think its more noisy than average of small cars
Bist du zufällig aus der Nähe wie das Kennzeichen ?
Das ist presseauto von Mitsubishi Motors Deutschland, hauptsitz von Mitsubishi ist in Friedberg, habe selber früher in Friedberg gewohnt 1997-2003
From 2013 space star 1, 2016 to now spa star 2, and now... Dacia Sandero... Space star is now too high priced in NL!
looks nice actually
"This should be lucky to break 90"
Doug DeMuro, 2017
That man has no clue about ordinary driviers with ordinary budgets. He lives in another universe.
@@ronaldderooij1774 bro thinks that a mirage can do 0-60 in a split second
How comfortable is it compared to the Suzuki Ignis?
Edit: Range 1460km, holy sh*t!
Comfort was normal, ignis is bit more comfy, but overall was for me space star better than ignis. Range 1460 km only if you drive all time 80 kmh
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK 1460 km with this small Tank? Never!
@@martinstahle2006 ist nur theoretisch möglich, da musst du ganze strecke immer in 80 kmh fahren und möglichst nur flach, auch nie bremsen und so. das ist möglich aber so nah bei 1460 km reichweite ist sehr schwierig zu erreichen, aber 1000-1300 km ist mehr möglich wenn du immer 80 kmh zb quer durch deutschland reist :)
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK write in English! Not everyone is from Romania
@@w.k.7277 Its Deutsch not Romanian xD
Can you do Suzuki Baleno?
The key to the whole Mitsubishi Mirage……………5spd. Period. F the cvt. It ruins the poor little car. So if you don’t know how to drive a five speed don’t buy one or buy one and learn how to drive stick
Hats my 18 year old Audi with 2.0l engine gives me the similar mileage. What's the bloody point?
What kind of engine? Diesel? Actually this mitsubishi is at top 10 lowest consumption we ever had tested. Many cars even newer audi a3 are higher than this space star, but the new audi a3 2.0 tdi has similiar or lower fuel like this space star
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK 20 valve 2.0l NA petrol engine, above 80kmh I get similar mileage. And my car weights almost 1500kg wet. These new cars are efficient at really low speed since they don't weigh much.
@@ardmrad9278 yeah but you must watch the rpm and transmission at small car, it has always higher rpm than bigger engines, even my 3.6 V6 pentastar has 1500 rpm at 120 kmh and consume 6.5-7 liter at 100 km
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK BTW does it have a Fiat engine?
Which car you mean?
Mitsubishi dealers: Here is your new ten-year-old car!
It's not made to have the newest gadgets and a worthless ''nice'' interior. It's made to be cheap, reliable transportation.
Maybe.....but my 2018 Mirage has been flawless since new and does everything I need a daily driver to do. I would buy again.
1.2 engine for €8k brand new with 5 years warranty, no need to complain...
I hope it will be as good as my 2006 daihatsu sirion! I think it will be.
Thats fine. It's a good ten year old car.
up to 120kmh relative good/acceptable consumption and 140 and especially 160 too high
You know just one poetry, do you? Consumption below 10 l/100 km at almost top speed is very good. You should be banned from commenting about cars, maybe you know something else better.
@@Seba03111976 others have less consumption at that speed and on their top one!! top speed of this car could be 100kmh too but it want be good again if consumption will be 10 liters!!
@@Mr11ESSE111 Again, you assume people buying this car are sitting at 160kph all day long on a German autobahn? No. I doubt 99.99% of these things will ever see above 120kph. If you're going to base your verdicts of cars on consumption at arbitrary speeds, just you wait when you start factoring in other things. You'll think cars are some hellspawn creature sent out to steal our money (tbh not far from the truth).
@@CheesemanGT most of journey there are on autobahn not outside of it on short and long distances
@@Mr11ESSE111 I drive in the Netherlands, never aboven 100 km/h (not allowed faster). My average consumption over 130.000 km is 4.2 l/100 km. That is good. And by the way 10l per 100 km at top speed is also good. Not many cars do 10l/100km at 160 km/h.
6:02 كأنه صوت ديزل
7:11
Takový test o ničem.