So Which Leman Russ Turrets are BEST in the Astra Militarum Codex?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 196

  • @auspextactics
    @auspextactics  2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Check out my full review of Codex Astra Militarum here: th-cam.com/video/VwUmmlvpJa0/w-d-xo.html

  • @peeledapples4176
    @peeledapples4176 2 ปีที่แล้ว +304

    It's hilarious to me that the Vanquisher cannon, which fires solid shells, can ignore invulns when a LITERAL VOLCANO CANNON can't.

    • @thenocguesswho
      @thenocguesswho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Not to mention the quake cannon lol

    • @Brother_Rony
      @Brother_Rony 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Especially since it is literally made to ignore void shields

    • @christianyoung6686
      @christianyoung6686 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      To be fair, the railgun is also a solid shot weapon.

    • @bhseigel
      @bhseigel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      kinetic energy is harder to displace the energy with a field emitter. with plasma/las/melta its all heat energy which is way easier to dissipate the energy over an emitter shield. Its pretty common in game that heat energy beats physical armor and kinetic weapon beats energy armor

    • @eugenax9345
      @eugenax9345 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@christianyoung6686 atleast that's not propelled by gunpowder propellant charges... :D

  • @KestrelM1
    @KestrelM1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    I'm glad that the classic Battle and Demolisher cannons are still solid choices, but I'm disappointed that there wasn't more effort put into making options like the Exterminator or Eradicator more competitive. It doesn't take more than a quick glance to note the Exterminator is completely inferior to the Battle cannon.

    • @weissraben4476
      @weissraben4476 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I mean, both are pretty much overshadowed by the Executioner coming back to claim what's theirs - the battle cannon doesn't have the oomph but has the shots, the demolisher has the oomph but not the shots. The executioner has both.

    • @Moorhuehnchen
      @Moorhuehnchen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it isn't. play with 8th ed. codex and you get more out of your guard army rather with 9th ed codex. you have to keep in mind you cannot reroll your number of shots anymore as that trait has been removed same with the cadian order. therefor it will be swingy AF. at least for me this marks the end of 40k playing. i hope you can find joy in it, maybe you'll find something you want once i put my stuff on ebay.

    • @jasongarfitt1147
      @jasongarfitt1147 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The exterminator being less swingy is the draw. I'm going to use mine to pin intercessors in melee

    • @weissraben4476
      @weissraben4476 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jasongarfitt1147 I mean, the Exterminator is - on average, of course - a worse battle cannon, and while the battle cannon absolutely got better, it's still a meh choice compared to the executioner and is best taken as a base for the Gatekeeper. And the Gatekeeper... well, it's enormously better than the Exterminator, on all fronts. Reliability included - 6+d3 shots will do that.

    • @jasongarfitt1147
      @jasongarfitt1147 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@weissraben4476 remember gatekeeper can't use mech orders

  • @PelinalDidNothingWrong
    @PelinalDidNothingWrong 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    It's nice to see classics like the battle cannon still be useful

  • @thatmanfred
    @thatmanfred 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    One big use case I can see for the Punisher is into Daemons. Not as much in a heavy foot Guard list, that already tends to have solid volume of fire, but if you're going for more of a spearhead, throwing in a couple of Punishers would likely be a big help.

  • @coldsteel.and.courage
    @coldsteel.and.courage 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I'm pretty tempted to use a tank ace vanquisher with the reroll to hit, then I'm thinking a gatekeeper tank commander shadowing a executioner to order the executioner reroll 1's. Next up maybe a pair of Demolishers with multi melta to roll up the middle (1 being a tank commander for the Blast order). 5 Russ hulls feels like a fairly nice middle ground for armored support

  • @CMTechnica
    @CMTechnica 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I’m just happy I no longer have to proxy my Vanquisher tanks as battle cannons 😂

  • @NornQueenKya
    @NornQueenKya 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Nothings better than the standard issue Battle Turret to backstab those filthy guard, in glory of our 4 armed masters

  • @venkelos6996
    @venkelos6996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I have to say, I mostly really like how this went. I don't want to say I just wanted something to break the Demolisher, and topple it from its place as THE auto-include LR turret, but I am glad to see that now there are options. The default, trusty Battle Cannon is nice, and I was truly praying that the Vanquisher Cannon was going to get at least some use breathed back into it, even if that Hvy 1 is still a bit scary, but it's so nice to see that all of these are now good, even if some are still better than others.
    I'm pleasantly pleased about the Eradicator Plasma Cannon. I've definitely wanted to see that weapon be better, too, being a fan of plasma weapons, and I liked the idea of at least one top-tier turret weapon being energy-based, in the 41st Millennium, instead of some big slug-yhrower pitching an explosive chunk of steel downrange. Overall, I am very happy to see where the Russ has gone. It's a good tank, and has several good alternative options, but it is also supported by other good units; seemingly gone are the days when most of the force would just be Demolisher Tank Commanders, hiding a Gatekeeper, with just enough cheap infantry to bubble wrap them against assault. Now, they are better, and more varied, among an army that is also better, and more varied. It still might not be a top-tier faction, guaranteed, but it's Guard; I wasn't demanding it suddenly overshadow Space Marines, and Harlequins, and I think it will be in a good place. I also think that the Leman Russ will help be what puts it there, but not the only piece that does.

  • @mh1ultramarine
    @mh1ultramarine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I loved the autocannon in 8th because it was cheaper, like a lot cheaper. 4 autocannon twin linked shots for 20 pts cheaper than a battle cannon was sweet

    • @johnpjones1775
      @johnpjones1775 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Umm…what?
      In 8th codex the exterminator for some ungodly reason was one of the most expensive second only to the punisher in cost…

  • @IcarusGames
    @IcarusGames ปีที่แล้ว +1

    IMO the punisher gatling canon is a great choice for mind games. 20 shots autowounding on 6s is hard to ignore, and I've found that my opponents are disproportionally worried by it compared to the damage it does on paper.

  • @Grits420
    @Grits420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm glad you brought up re rolls. The vanquisher and executioner will pull away even more with one built in re roll. It mitigates the swinginess in the vanquisher hit and wound roll. I want to see the stats vs the demolisher and battle cannon with a re roll.

  • @YeomanArcher
    @YeomanArcher 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I actually still have a small guard army themed around being armored recon and used Conquerors and Exterminators back when they used to be cheaper, points wise. Lore wise, the Conqueror and Exterminator are supposed to be faster due to the weight savings, but never translated to tabletop.
    I want to play the song: "GAS GAS GAS", as I Tokyo drift an Exterminator Leman Russ around a city corner and open up on the flank of Ork speed freaks, popping trukks and warbikes.

  • @ONI09100
    @ONI09100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you could also take the tank ace trait that gives you a 5+ save for the executioner against mortal wounds. i think the nover cannon is quite handy as it also ignores strats and doctarians that give units cover it also ignores the hit mods for cover as well. the vanquisher deserves more credit even if it is a single shot because if anything is worth a reroll it is so your hit and wound rate is far more likely

  • @JellothePallascat
    @JellothePallascat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I rock a Vanquisher, a Demolisher, and a Punisher…. Huh lots of Ers….. I was looking into another tank to grab. Looks like I’ll be grabbing another Er with the Executioner!

  • @campbell1871
    @campbell1871 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video buddy. Really useful advice.

  • @Gnarlf
    @Gnarlf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really want a Vanquisher, because that long tank hunter barrel looks just great. You can get it quite reliable, so I still like it.
    The punisher seems awsome against deamons, doesn't it. Not sure if it's worth it for that since guard can get volume of shots elsewhere. It depends the army composition I guess.

  • @ethandehoff3517
    @ethandehoff3517 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think the 1-reroll tank ace also works well with a hull-mounted Lascannon since it gives another single, chunky shot to use your hit reroll with if you don't need it for the Vanquisher.

  • @WithinReality
    @WithinReality ปีที่แล้ว

    Vanquisher with hull lascannon, sponson meltas, and maybe a hunter killer missile for kicks. It's meant to face down the heaviest targets on the other side of the board, like heavy lancer cavalry in tank form. Of course, needs thorough infantry and possible anti-air support. Is hard to field in large numbers. Obligatorily bring a tank ace per squadron of these whenever possible. This type of squadron is the titan hunters I would bring if I don't have a dedicated Baneblade pattern like the Shadowsword. Chimeras with plenty of heavy bolters would be a good dragoon option to support such a Vanquisher squadron against horde armies. Maybe throw in a Basilisk or other artillery platform for extra payload. Squadrons of armored sentinels could be also an interesting option when facing other targets than hordes.

  • @Earliersphere
    @Earliersphere 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The exterminator autocannon has had the wrong profile since way back in the index for 8th. It should be heavy 8, as before 8th ed it was heavy 4 twin linked. Yet when it came to 8th or later it was just a twin auto cannon. it also used to be one of the few none ordinance russes that could move and shoot, but that's not really a thing any more so it is rather out mode. the executioner has always been solid.

  • @migraine8746
    @migraine8746 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You sir are a star. Thanks for the great content.

  • @awood0813
    @awood0813 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Punisher also has the niche use of being the absolute best if you really want to use the pinning fire mechanized order. Pinning fire alone will help neuter the speed of any unit and combine it with Mental shackles psychic power and a powerful melee infantry unit isn’t going anywhere. Not great but it does have that order going for it too.

  • @giantorres3352
    @giantorres3352 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like the style of your videos.

  • @mikoajkosowski1750
    @mikoajkosowski1750 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My tank core is gonna be a Tank Commander with Gatekeeper, Lascannon and 2 HBs and ignore cover tank ace ability, and a squadron of 3 regular ones, two with Executioner plasma cannons and one Vanquisher with tank ace for the trait that allows to reroll one hit roll. Seems like a quite balanced and versatile combination, support this core with some ponies and Kasrkin and it should make a pretty nice list.

  • @Reaver70
    @Reaver70 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the thing Iike about the brutal 1 shot No invuln's on vehicles is if you have kept it alive for Mid game (with range from the enemy) you can use them as assassins with high (or slightly reduced) movement. with bait targets and coaxing enemy character beatsticks into traps and fall back...

  • @stormraven8484
    @stormraven8484 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I loved the twin linked Las cannon of the animator variatan

  • @Nobleheart111
    @Nobleheart111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now compare the Gatekeeper Relic Battle Cannon, Executioner Cannon, and Tank Ace for 1 re-roll Vanquisher Cannon.

  • @joshuacollins5860
    @joshuacollins5860 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good thing I magnetized my Leman Russ Demolisher and my second is a Battle Cannon. Figured they wouldn't be to terrible in the new codex. It is surprisingly though that the Executioner looks so good against almost anything, but Plasma is overall in a sweet spot for strength, AP and damage compared to so many other weapons.

  • @amwoodco3049
    @amwoodco3049 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, for my 6 tanks.
    Armoured Superiority and Elite Gunner (count as multiple models per tank and 1 reroll per turn)
    2 Commanders, 1 with Gate Keeper, 1 with Demolisher with Warlord Trait to order itself.
    2 Erradicators accompany Gatekeeper. 1 Vanquisher moves where needed. 1 Punisher Accompanies Demolisher. Lots of Plasma Cannons and Flamers for Sponsons.
    Hmm... I'll need to work on this.

  • @TheRunningPigeon
    @TheRunningPigeon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not watched yet, but going to guess that Executioner will be math in as the best all-rounder and Vanquisher being the best dedicated anti-armour.
    Gatekeeper will also be amazing.

  • @HenryC04
    @HenryC04 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Plagueburst has armor of contempt, not sure if you took that into account but it would change the numbers if you didn’t

  • @LeCharles07
    @LeCharles07 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    GW messed up with the Rogal Dorn. Guard needed a troop tank, practically speaking, not a larger tank than the Russ. They need something that you can take masses of and just chuck them at the enemy.

  • @richarddixon1450
    @richarddixon1450 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hammer of the emperor on a squadron of executioners covered in plasma just sounds absolutely terrifying.
    Plus with all the other buffs on top of that. *shudders*

    • @williamkirshbom3163
      @williamkirshbom3163 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep, with 2+ save and AOC, Guard is going to be shooting folks off the table for a while until the nerf bat comes around as it always does.

    • @williamkirshbom3163
      @williamkirshbom3163 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, at least on the russes.

  • @daitrigger179
    @daitrigger179 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You are a legend thank you

  • @travisvance7736
    @travisvance7736 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I know that this audience is more aimed at matched/competitive play, but theoretically with crusade you could bump the Punisher to damage 2 which could be pretty scary

  • @Grits420
    @Grits420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd like to see the stats with pound them to dust and the re roll 1s orders applied. Considering how easy it is to get them

  • @StormWolf880
    @StormWolf880 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Still miss my Leman Russ Conquerors, they were a fun turret option

  • @michaelveritas1930
    @michaelveritas1930 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What gets Auspex most excited? Data and spreadsheets!

  • @pabloalonsolasagabaster658
    @pabloalonsolasagabaster658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hmm with conscripts out of the codex, punisher cannon is not a bad option I think, although I am going to miss those 40 dice (now it is cheaper though).

  • @richard_n
    @richard_n 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The prime job of a tank is to take out heavy threats. So I'd go with the Demolisher since it's great against any vehicle or terminators. I'd pair it with an anti infantry gun on the hull to deal with hordes. That way you are effective into any army.

  • @masterofthelag8414
    @masterofthelag8414 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    RIP Nova cannon, best looking gun on the russ, still one of the worst game wise huh? I was hoping the changes would boost it up a bit but I guess GW still isn't great at math.

    • @rossvolkmann1161
      @rossvolkmann1161 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just proxy it as a Battle Cannon, that's what I do with my conqueror turrets.

    • @ColonelMetus
      @ColonelMetus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The nova cannon was very good in 7th edition

    • @ronnyrdr6553
      @ronnyrdr6553 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ColonelMetus 7th is seen as the dark edition. nobody talks about it since it was something no one wishes to remember. 7th never existed

    • @andrewsan1997
      @andrewsan1997 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ColonelMetus I remember those days back when cover was a save and screwing over cultists was a fun past time.

    • @EmperorSigismund
      @EmperorSigismund 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Eradicator was my bread and butter along with the Executioner pre-8th ed. Its stats made it a potent anti infantry specialist. When 8th edition rolled around everything that made it special became redudant. This was their chance to make it special again and they blew it.

  • @Silverdragon83X
    @Silverdragon83X 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best variant depends strongly on the rest of the army. I think Nova Cannon and Autocannon variants are worst, rest is ok. As now normal guardmen with lasrifles can do some damage at range with the FRFSRF order, I think the big guns are best on the LR, because they are quite tough for their points. I now prefer the Vanquisher cannon, with 1-3 HEavy Bolters. So it can fire its main cannon at big threads, but still can do something against hordes, too!

  • @DavidBretton
    @DavidBretton 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm giving serious thoughts to a blob of 3 Executioner Russes, with a TC using Gatekeeper or Vanquisher. Probably all with HB/2HF in hull and sponsons.

  • @brianbrinegar6086
    @brianbrinegar6086 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video

  • @jhz731
    @jhz731 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Can we see something similar for the different classes of baneblade

  • @TheWarmaker01
    @TheWarmaker01 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As for the punisher, if it were like the A-10 Warthog's rotary cannon and what that does to ground targets...........cause it still looks really cool.
    Orks may have dakka but humans have BBBBRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT

  • @blackwolf671
    @blackwolf671 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The punisher had its time in 8th. (whats left of) 9th belongs to the Vanquisher.

  • @davidwidstam9322
    @davidwidstam9322 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im just loving the stratagem to have your opponent come in turn 3 whit reserves. My brother plays Thousand sons and demons so hes going to have to deal whit my Leman russ fire the first turns

    • @neilbatterham8370
      @neilbatterham8370 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Even better is to screen out turn 2 and deny turn 3 that way any reserves either come in in a carp position or don't come in at all

    • @williamkirshbom3163
      @williamkirshbom3163 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@neilbatterham8370 Easy to do if you have enough guardsman spread out around the board.

  • @samuelsbald3038
    @samuelsbald3038 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For the love of Terra please, please change the picture of the leman Russ so the turret matches the one your talking about.
    2 weeks into the hobby there are enough things to remember without also memorizing every turret name and model 😂

  • @Jagdpz5
    @Jagdpz5 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Punisher seems to be tailor made to kill ork boyz (just enough strength to wound on 3s, just enough AP to remove all armour saves and Dam 1 so no overkill).

  • @jamesloder8652
    @jamesloder8652 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The punisher is great for applying pinning fire but that's about it I think

  • @robertlowe4784
    @robertlowe4784 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just cut off a punisher's gun and replaced with a vanquisher barrel meaning that squad has a plasma, punisher and vanquish. Just got to decide if the 3 demolisher squad should become 2 and a plasma now.. 🤔 tank commander gets to keep his relic battle cannon (1 battle, 1 plasma, 2 punish, 3 demolish - to - 1 battle, 2 plasma, 1 punish, 2 demo and 1 vanquish) think I'll do it and get my 7 russ's ready for 9th... got a whole 7-8months to play with them.. lol

  • @WarRabb1t
    @WarRabb1t 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think Battle Cannons are going to be on tank commanders while your normal Leman Russ run the Plasma Cannon because they can get re rolls while the TC can't. The same argument can be used for vanquisher cannons as well.

    • @Gnarlf
      @Gnarlf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You could even get a lone vauisher tank ace ordering itsef, right? That might be worth a shot.

    • @WarRabb1t
      @WarRabb1t 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Gnarlf Tank Commanders can't order themselves anymore.

    • @Gnarlf
      @Gnarlf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WarRabb1t Yes a tank comander couldn't do it out of the box.
      However i understud it to be, because tank comanders dont have the *squadron* key word.
      There is a tank ace upgrade to allow a normal Leman Russ to issue orders.
      Since it doesnÄt make him loose his own *squadron* keyword, he should then be able to issue the order to himself.
      If that is not what is intended, then there would be a warlord trait, that allows an officer to order his own unit. I think that trait can affect tank comanders.

    • @WarRabb1t
      @WarRabb1t 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Gnarlf isn't that only for Rogal Dorns and Super Heavies?

    • @Gnarlf
      @Gnarlf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WarRabb1t right, that might be the case. Hmm... ok, new plan. Shadowsword instead of Vanquisher then 😋✌️

  • @RJALEXANDER777
    @RJALEXANDER777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would it have been a problem if the Nova Cannon could ignore heavy and light cover? Would better cement what it's intended niche is.

    • @XealotCoils
      @XealotCoils 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Heavy only affects melee.

    • @RJALEXANDER777
      @RJALEXANDER777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@XealotCoils Ah gotcha. Thanks.

  • @TheSilverDragon1
    @TheSilverDragon1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So a tank commander with the relic, supporting a ex plasma with the re roll order is most llikely the most optional play.

    • @weissraben4476
      @weissraben4476 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why /one/ ex plasma? Why not /three/.
      (Because it's way too many points on one single spot of the field, that's why.)

  • @JanusPilkington
    @JanusPilkington 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plasma weaponry is meant to be lost tech or did the Imperium find the STC for it in the few years? Same price as a Battle cannon doesn't make sense.

  • @sanguinius6815
    @sanguinius6815 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel sorry for any knights players who run into a IG player with a Vanquisher or three in their lineup

  • @19platten20
    @19platten20 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My Armageddon Ork Hunters will still field their punisher next to their hellhounds

  • @jreimer666
    @jreimer666 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im bringing a punisher to use the supressing fire tank order to slow units

  • @SchwhatNow
    @SchwhatNow 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Punisher can still be used to break crusade games unfortunately. Artificer Weapon on a Tank Commander gives 1 mortal wound for every 6 to hit, in addition to the normal damage that attack might produce. When you have 20 shots that can be downright devastating. Otherwise yeah, for matched play it doesn't really seem worth it to me.

  • @foxdavion6865
    @foxdavion6865 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Punisher is great verses swarm armies, so melee rush across the board without any transport focused Orks such as snakebite or goffs. As well as swarm focused mass body trooper Tyranids, along with other Imperial Guard armies that are conscript heavy, considering conscript heavy armies are meta right now in tournament play, it is a good way to make tryhards cry. Ok against Eldar (all 5 different factions), Mechanicus and Tau. Breaks Even against Space Marines (loyalists and traitors alike); Bad for everything else, especially big Tyranids.
    I agree, it is just one of those units you keep in your army box to bring to battles if you really want to shine on an opponent who is mass rushing conscripts or a melee rush ork or nid army to teach them a lesson for using an unbalanced cheese list.
    It seems that *as usual* Plasma weapons are the best! When it comes to any Imperial Guard anything, be it table top or the video games. Are they worth the risk? Almost all the time... YES!

  • @CdrChaos
    @CdrChaos ปีที่แล้ว

    Suppose instead of trying make it more powerful, they made it noticeably CHEAPER, would the Exterminator be a better option then?
    It’s not as good at anti-infantry as the Punisher, and not as good at anti-armor as the Battle Tank, but it’s got long range and it costs less to add to an army than either of those.

  • @MyChannel-tl8ms
    @MyChannel-tl8ms 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    a random question: I am not sure about objective secure with space marines. I don't know which unit can have objective secure ability. Nice video by the way

    • @XealotCoils
      @XealotCoils 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All troops have objective secured. But Space Marines have a warlord trait called Rites of War that gives a 6 inch aura around the character that gives other units objective secured. Not sure if it's only core units but you get the point.

  • @jcrosato
    @jcrosato 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think the eradicator should/could be like HevD3+6 S6 Ap-2 Dam2 ignores cover and invulnerable saves and then it would have a purpose. A real deamon hunter / low toughness but invulnerable save units XD
    Exterminator seems like it will always be in a weird spot. Autocannons shoot twice each.. max shots i can image would be 8.. 5 per barrel seems to not make sense...
    Maybe Hev8 S7 ap-2 D2 rerolling hits and wounds or something

    • @colonelturmeric558
      @colonelturmeric558 ปีที่แล้ว

      As a subatomic shell I always imagined it working like a melta weapon in a way, not a beam but a ballistic melta charge. Wish russes had more energy weapons rather than 4 cannons and some shooty shooty guns

  • @ronnyrdr6553
    @ronnyrdr6553 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you say: " Seems usable though! " After just explaining all of the reasons why you pretty much never have to use the punisher cannon :S. I know 40 bullets before was too much. (they increased the points in 8th because it would've been too efficient in 8th) But they could've taken it to 30 instead of slicing the number in half. And yer the eradicator nova and exterminator cannons. I mean we have people who do the math. There is no way GW is too dumb for this. So how can these happen :S ?. I think they just couldnt think of anything better to make them stand out.

    • @davidbowles7281
      @davidbowles7281 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      GW is absolutely that dumb. They sell to addicts, and that doesn't take any intelligence.

  • @wolfhunter98
    @wolfhunter98 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dump question, but extra damage is lost on lower W models right?
    AKA you hit a guardsman with a dam 3 weapon it doesn't "bleed over" and kill 3 total guys right?

  • @chuchlate
    @chuchlate 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    if i run all executioners. what do i run for the best sponsons and hull mounted

  • @Nobleheart111
    @Nobleheart111 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Demolishers vs Battle Cannons seem really good against Death Guard.

  • @nailbiter6974
    @nailbiter6974 ปีที่แล้ว

    What happened to the incinerator? Can you still use it?

  • @starak97
    @starak97 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the auto cannon is good enough for casual play. Since if you spam the good options people will probably not want to play against you. I say 1 vanquisher/plasma and max 2 battle cannons for casual. The nova cannon is actually good against the "if you are have the benefits of cover then..." units. I think that when the data slate comes out, the russ turret options will get points adjustments, the "all turrets cost the same" screams "we'll fix it in post"

  • @YeomanArcher
    @YeomanArcher 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Never understood why in the game, there is never a multi-laser for a hull or sponson mount for the Leman Russ, or multi-laser for the heavy weapon teams. In lore it makes sense. So many other guard vehicles have them as standard weapon options.

    • @colonelturmeric558
      @colonelturmeric558 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or autocannons in the hull/sponsons. Carnodon has autocannon sponsons, why not russ?

  • @HighlandPhoenix
    @HighlandPhoenix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Surely GW had one job and that was to make the Nova cannon and Autocannons turrets actual alternatives! 🤦🏼‍♂️ The Nova should be D6+6 shots and ignore heavy cover too, and the Autocannons should be Heavy 8, Str 7 (why are they 8?), AP-2, and D3 damage instead…imo.

    • @thewindowsmaaane
      @thewindowsmaaane 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cause they're real big autocannons...

    • @XealotCoils
      @XealotCoils 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Heavy cover only affects melee...

  • @9bang88
    @9bang88 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where do the breeches of any of these guns fit inside those turrets...

  • @troutwarrior6735
    @troutwarrior6735 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So did guard lose grinding advance? That for me would be a major factor when taking a punisher.

    • @frostedbutts4340
      @frostedbutts4340 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. Most of the weapons got a lot better to compensate, Punisher not so much.

  • @rbenscoter14
    @rbenscoter14 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dont know where to ask but how is the armageddon baskalisk looking? is it a viable thing in games? I love its look!

  • @kelvinvoorneveld7265
    @kelvinvoorneveld7265 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so how about the baneblades now. how do they stack up to each other

    • @BloodyArchangelus
      @BloodyArchangelus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      just pick shadowsword to kill everything BIG IN SIGHT. after that 2 leman russ would kill other things

    • @patykaarplegos6282
      @patykaarplegos6282 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gonna be using my shadowsword now. Used it a little just because it's cool, but now its a real threat

    • @chronosmalkeri4157
      @chronosmalkeri4157 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Based on auspexes last vid, the stormsword (I think) (suped up demolisher) is your best choice.

  • @rubensmith776
    @rubensmith776 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Forgive me if this is a stupid question but does the "base cost" include the turret cost and if not how much do they cost point-wise.

  • @chronosmalkeri4157
    @chronosmalkeri4157 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone know what the heavy flamer range is? If its 12, then plus 4 for the doctrine, then executioner and triple flamer is gonna be lol on my tank company

  • @wikkyd989
    @wikkyd989 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm surprised there's no annihilator version, but I guess with a vanquisher and a plasmacannon and there's no point in having it

  • @styks6480
    @styks6480 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you done a vid like this for Votann? I've gone through em not sure if I'm missing one.

  • @joenewkirk6136
    @joenewkirk6136 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    YES I love this video

  • @desgildanphi8825
    @desgildanphi8825 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Plasma looking solid if u had reroll 1

  • @VulgarisScientificae
    @VulgarisScientificae 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you do the same with the baneblade ?

  • @jasongarfitt1147
    @jasongarfitt1147 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Although the exterminator and nova cannon aren't as good as the others they are far closer than they were.

  • @TOCZEKX
    @TOCZEKX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Guys, never play Auspex at 0.5 speed. It's cursed.

  • @niolelo
    @niolelo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still miss the annihilator

  • @lollandgibbons878
    @lollandgibbons878 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like I’m the only one that liked the punisher it used to have 20 shots and if you don’t move you get to fire it again that’s 40shots in one turn that always helped me against my mates nids

  • @thegeneralscall
    @thegeneralscall 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah, vanquisher is finally good again. Was literally a joke for a long time.

  • @ChrisJohnson-vi3ed
    @ChrisJohnson-vi3ed 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really don't like the executioner without consistent re-rolling 1s. You might only take 1mw on average a turn, but the times when you roll 3-5 1s are going to cost you the game.

    • @Khobai
      @Khobai 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      rolling 3-5 1s is likely going to cost you the game regardless.

  • @malvatoss5840
    @malvatoss5840 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like you want atleast one vanquisher in your list to pick up enemy vehicles

  • @sierraminiatures
    @sierraminiatures 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Too bad the Eradicator Nova cannon always sucks because it's the coolest looking option IMO.

  • @Yakkahboo
    @Yakkahboo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man, looking at this breakdown really brings into perspective how unfit for purpose weapon profiles are. In what reality is a battle cannon doing d6+3 shots in a round? Most of these guns should be shooting once and going bang in various different ways. I get that the shots profile is to differentiate between their effects but it just feels so bad when you have to disassociate number of shots you get in game to what you imagine actually happening.

  • @LordGreavous
    @LordGreavous 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    quantity over quality works best for me so ill be taking the punisher, averages dont exist in my games so just dump dice and hope.

  • @johnpjones1775
    @johnpjones1775 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Exterminator is the best.
    Battle cannon- boring
    Vanquisher, just a long battle cannon
    Demolisher ok kinda cool has some decently original lore
    Eradicator just a bigger demolisher
    Executioner just a big plasma cannon that has no niche.
    Exterminator is the most unique in appearance and in lore. This makes it the best.

  • @electricbee1475
    @electricbee1475 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    do they still get grinding advance?

    • @timothytimmins5119
      @timothytimmins5119 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That rule is confirmed to be gone in the new codex

  • @coco26006
    @coco26006 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    its weird how the executioner went from the worst tank gun, to the best this codex

  • @wh40kev98
    @wh40kev98 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Exterminator Autocannon" cries in heavy psycannon

  • @captfuzzy1618
    @captfuzzy1618 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But what's the best for fighting T5? I fight T5 almost exclusively among my friends.

    • @captfuzzy1618
      @captfuzzy1618 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Death Guard, Necrons, and orks are what my friends play with sisters being the odd ball out.

  • @UncleFester84
    @UncleFester84 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I miss the annihilator version

    • @matthewwarren3370
      @matthewwarren3370 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This! I kitbashed me some twin lascannons and have made 3 of them, I think it’s the best look for a leman russ. That and the plasma cannon bring the russ from looking like a WW1 tank into a 41st millennium tank

  • @LyubenV
    @LyubenV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Tfw built an autocannon one because it looked cool but is pretty much the worst one

    • @joshy7759
      @joshy7759 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It looks SO cool. One day it'll pan out. I just finished an Annihilator kitbash cause the dual guns look so cool but the auto cannon are so bad.

    • @aidanquiett668
      @aidanquiett668 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It does have a good niche. Use your infantry to bog stuff down in melee, and then use your autocannons to focus down those squads. Lack of blast means you can fire it into melee with new guard rules