Beyond Neoliberalism - When an Orthodoxy Hits its Expiration Date | Dr. Johannes Meier | TEDxHHL

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Is there a change in society and its behavior? Dr. Johannes Meier gives you a new view on the change in Neoliberalism based on the current developments in the world. Johannes Meier is a private scholar, educator and systems architect. He holds a M.S. in Computer Science and a Ph.D. in Communication and Information Sciences. Johannes sits on the supervisory boards of Xing SE, Hamburg, Cliqz GmbH, Munich, Meridian Foundation, Essen, Mercator Foundation, Essen, and Unicef, Germany. He has been lecturing regularly on leadership in the MBA program of HHL, Leipzig. From 2011 until 2017 he was the CEO of the European Climate Foundation which is focused on policies that mitigate climate change and drive the transition to a low-carbon economy. Prior to joining the European Climate Foundation he was a partner at McKinsey & Co. (1990-1997), CEO of GE CompuNet Computer AG (1998-2003), and managing board member of the Bertelsmann Foundation (2003-2009). In 2009 he founded a software start-up and developed a collaboration platform for the German Public Employment Agency, the Labor Market Monitor, which won the 2011 e-government award for most innovative e-government solution in Germany. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at www.ted.com/tedx

ความคิดเห็น • 60

  • @arnoldmugo3874
    @arnoldmugo3874 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Looking forward to the new orthodoxy beyond Neoliberalism

    • @Anita-md9ze
      @Anita-md9ze 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Solarpunk. Donut economics.

  • @carlosferreira5709
    @carlosferreira5709 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Congratulations for the extraordinary holistic vision!!

  • @krunalpatel3414
    @krunalpatel3414 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Wht neo-liberalism means to us serfs is; gig economy and hook-up culture, so no settling-down as everything is fickle and liquid now.

    • @juicyparsons
      @juicyparsons 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you lol

    • @fatpotatoe6039
      @fatpotatoe6039 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yes, adapting to serve the purposes of others and yourself is "serfdom"

  • @kenzong8427
    @kenzong8427 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Good start, rare discussion on neoLiberalism, thats we can built up from here. Rare lecture , good start. Thank you

  • @progressivelyolder
    @progressivelyolder ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Talking to business leaders and predictably receiving an underwhelming ovation.

  • @julianmeier3202
    @julianmeier3202 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Wow really smart man with a great message

  • @imfunnyiswear1490
    @imfunnyiswear1490 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So put non-business advisers on boards, reduce economic volatility, and intertwine government and business. This is just progressive corporatism. It’s only end will be preserving the oligarchy by intertwining it with bureaucracy.

    • @usnbostx2
      @usnbostx2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are conflating “neoliberalism” with the free market, when in fact we’re suffering from corporatism and the effects of central banking. It’s funny he described how the rising tide has in fact lifted all ships at the beginning, and then later described it as an emperor with no clothes.

  • @amooij
    @amooij 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So who will decide what's good for everybody?

    • @fatpotatoe6039
      @fatpotatoe6039 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      big daddy govt which loves you and wants to care for you cradle to grave - and these idiots call free markets and liberty serfdom lmao

  • @screenarts
    @screenarts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Neoliberalism is just laissez-faire economics with a catch. Under neoliberalism the government power is used to support and advance business over people. We've been posed on for 40 years.

    • @qwertyuiop-tk9rr
      @qwertyuiop-tk9rr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Basically it's even worse than laissez-faire liberalism because the state's power is fully mobilized to oppress the working class and enslave the population in the interests of private financial and business institutions. Corporations can get away with anything because the lender of last resort will ensure they never fail despite irresponsible behaviour and poor financial management.

    • @shaunrutherford7764
      @shaunrutherford7764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor, as they say.

  • @Iandar1
    @Iandar1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Remember when the world bank admitted poverty was increasing but then by a magical twist of the wrist they said poverty was decreasing.

    • @JTSeneca
      @JTSeneca 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Perhaps because it is a reality Ian. Don¨t you belive in science?

    • @Iandar1
      @Iandar1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@JTSeneca well the $1.90 (I believe) as the international poverty line is arbitrary, most if not all poverty decreases have been in the People’s Republic of China and they did the same exact thing the USSR did between Lenin’s death and their entrance into WW2 in the 1938 or 1939 but then handed things to the private sector much like the US has done with all the innovations the state has done in the last 100 years. It is true that the proportion of people in poverty has decreased but to eliminate poverty will take 200 years but the economy must reach 173 times its size right now (which we have no reason to believe) and no recessions happen (seeing not only we going through one now they happen every 4-7 years on average).

  • @BERENCEV
    @BERENCEV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Watch Adam Curtis’ latest documentary films to get a broader picture and dive deeper into the subject.

  • @patrickvernon2749
    @patrickvernon2749 ปีที่แล้ว

    We cant ask business owners to do anything. The state needs to gain strength. The atate and the workers organizations need to gain relative strength. Thats what needs to happen

  • @Xpzilla
    @Xpzilla 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I feel like conservatives are gonna click on this video thinking it's dunking on left wingers and be shocked to find out its the exact opposite.

    • @samuraichampionz
      @samuraichampionz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep.

    • @usnbostx2
      @usnbostx2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I wouldn’t say the opposite…it could actually be an attack on both.

  • @Szcza04
    @Szcza04 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s even worse than pure free market economics. They get to do whatever they want, and rewarded generously by the state.

  • @land3021
    @land3021 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    They'll probably renew it and then continue buisiness as usual until the next expiration date, and the next one after that and the next one after that... with things changing hundreds of years down the line little by little... sadly.

    • @gking407
      @gking407 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Worse living conditions, inequality, and environmental problems will make continuation impossible

    • @land3021
      @land3021 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gking407 You're right, but lets say, they make things a tiny bit better(like reducing carbon emissions a bit aswell as cleaning up just enough to get a bit more time so to speak) - basically, making enough change for people to not be allowed to complain, yet little enough for the issue to still exist...

  • @resto95
    @resto95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I hate neoliberals

  • @mahmud6229
    @mahmud6229 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The more I listen to such a good talks, the more I believe that a life on earth without a belief in the After-Life, as per religious meaning, is just another a failure orthodoxy.
    The missing meaning he was talking about can't come from a life without a holy existence that must be started from the God and will return to the God.

    • @thomaswikstrand8397
      @thomaswikstrand8397 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ...what? No, having invisible friends is not relevant, ever, in any way.

  • @Odinarcade00
    @Odinarcade00 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When an orthodoxy turns into 1984 and/or Handmaids tale it’s time to STOP

  • @tombouie
    @tombouie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aka prescience

  • @jeanpaulsarrazinmartinez597
    @jeanpaulsarrazinmartinez597 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Too many unfounded assumptions

  • @BinanceUSD
    @BinanceUSD ปีที่แล้ว

    Future is Bitcoin

  • @jonkjolstad
    @jonkjolstad 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Extremely naive, at times distressingly shallow, at first, although I will allow for a few very important points being made later on.

    • @paperlesstest740
      @paperlesstest740 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well it's only 18 minutes. One can say the same of a parable.

    • @declankerr9085
      @declankerr9085 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Jon, sounds like you are a dinosaur and part of the problem.😷

    • @redrosa8715
      @redrosa8715 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      let me guess, you either bought digital currency or are happy with the selfish fruits of capitalism?

    • @keving707
      @keving707 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was gonna say

  • @jesusmariacasaltorres2488
    @jesusmariacasaltorres2488 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    global inequality has fallen not risen

    • @Iandar1
      @Iandar1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      It’s been on the rise since at least 2005.

    • @farenhite4329
      @farenhite4329 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Ian Thomson
      They’re a conservative, facts are fiction to them.

    • @Iandar1
      @Iandar1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Farenhite and vice versa unfortunately

    • @aaronmathias6739
      @aaronmathias6739 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArthurWuYeah211 You have said a lot of things & yet absolutely nothing.
      Why are you being intentionally vague?

    • @davidalexanderlourie4371
      @davidalexanderlourie4371 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That means poverty has been normalized. More people are equally poor.