The Fractal Genius of THE SHINING | A Film That Captures the Expanding Patterns of Reality

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 มี.ค. 2024
  • The Shining is one of the greatest horror films of all time: not just because it tells a great story, but because it exposes the depths of human life, addressing psychology and alcoholism alongside the mysteries of the supernatural, blurring the lines between family dynamics, class conflict, and metaphysical questions like the nature of time and being. The failure of rationalism fosters a crisis of morality. The nature of evil and innocence are seen in the light of assimilation and the loss of self vs. the individual who acts on his own responsibility. The way we act shapes the way we PERCEIVE the world itself. A man comes to delight in the very things which once horrified him; a family you might encounter in daily life will find themselves reliving history.
    SOCIAL MEDIA LINKS
    Instagram: / empire_of_the_mind
    Facebook: / empire-of-the-mind-102...
    Twitter: / _empireofmind
    RUMBLE: rumble.com/c/c-1405986
    PATREON: / empireofthemind
    Email: theempireofthemind@gmail.com
    CHAPTERS
    00:00
    3:51 Telling a Story by Seeing Into the Future
    11:16 Father & Son Walk the Same Path
    17:19 A Man Becomes a Kipling Poem
    27:53 How Desire Changes a Man
    38:01 Evil Masks Itself & Throws a Party
    48:20 Salvation and Self-Sacrifice
    52:36 Suffering Is the Key to Understanding Reality
    57:52 The Nature of Evil: Imitation, Assimilation, Incoherence
    1:12:54 Innocence: The Power of Becoming Like a Child
    1:18:06 Fractal Patterns: The World Is a Story of Imitation

ความคิดเห็น • 442

  • @Marc-dj5fk
    @Marc-dj5fk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +259

    Whenever a friend comes up to me with their new theory about the shining, I "corrrrect" them.

    • @martinandersen3309
      @martinandersen3309 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Yeah, you do 🪓

    • @edgadalinski7493
      @edgadalinski7493 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      And what about his wife, did she prevent you from doing your DUTY?

    • @Wes66-143LakePowellProductions
      @Wes66-143LakePowellProductions 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Gotta remember to trill those RR's.

    • @MrBazzabee
      @MrBazzabee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      That's absolutely brilliant. It has thrilled my day.

    • @deancreate
      @deancreate 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      😂

  • @madameversiera
    @madameversiera 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +133

    This is a rare film which stays with you forever on a subconscious level.

    • @ThinkForYourself1972
      @ThinkForYourself1972 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes, and often the unconscious foreverness of this film surfaces into the conscious. . .

    • @GeorgeSmileyOBE
      @GeorgeSmileyOBE 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All play and no work makes flak a dull joy.

    • @edpoe1108
      @edpoe1108 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Or you might say, it stays with you forever and ever and ever. I guess we're all kind of trapped in the Overlook maze.

    • @zachvanslyke4341
      @zachvanslyke4341 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It truly does. Kubrick was a genius

    • @koreangirlgroup.
      @koreangirlgroup. หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It stays with you… forever and ever and ever.

  • @MrJoseoz
    @MrJoseoz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +99

    I saw THE SHINING in 1980 at 16 years old, im now 60 still obsessed and stuck in the overlook hotel, forever and ever

    • @edpoe1108
      @edpoe1108 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Speaking of fractals, I just made essentially the same comment on here.

    • @TiltedMarc
      @TiltedMarc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      1980? I'm sorry to differ, sir.
      You've always been here.

    • @MrJoseoz
      @MrJoseoz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@TiltedMarc ty Mr. Grady

    • @user-mj6zr5gh7s
      @user-mj6zr5gh7s หลายเดือนก่อน

      And ever….and ever…and ever!

    • @jooliagoolia9959
      @jooliagoolia9959 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Me too ‼️
      I saw it on opening weekend and had to wait three extra hours in line to see it that night.

  • @vinniecasqer840
    @vinniecasqer840 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    The photo is an esoteric idea. The soul loop. Jack is a materialist. He hates an adorable son, a sweet wife and an honorable profession - teacher - because he's after hedonism and glory. His soul is trapped in the physical dimension, where he is doomed to be in for eternity unless he breaks free from the "values" his soul clings to in some lifetime. Why he was always the caretaker. Why he submitted to malevolent spirits of the hotel. Why he couldn't write. He had no substance.

    • @apxprdtr_mge
      @apxprdtr_mge 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Fantastic interpretation. You hit the nail on the head.

    • @annette2326
      @annette2326 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wow.
      I'll re-watch the movie.

    • @aakkoin
      @aakkoin 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That sounds like some gnostic garbage philosophy, that our lives, our bodies, our family, nature and reality itself, is all a PRISON, in which we are trapped, and we should "liberate" ourselves by breaking free of all rules and restrictions, smash everything to pieces, subvert everything. It's horrible and wrong.

    • @acliffy7939
      @acliffy7939 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Nicely said

    • @markrobertson6664
      @markrobertson6664 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Love this

  • @colelevel2654
    @colelevel2654 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    My friends, they didn't care for The Shining at first. One of them even tried to call it boring. But I... corrrected them. And when my wife tried to stop me from doing my duty, I... corrected her.

    • @user-py6wg3sq9e
      @user-py6wg3sq9e 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      You aren’t Correct.

  • @enriccoc7794
    @enriccoc7794 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    the real curse of the overlook hotel is the fact that once you make a video about it, nothing you ever do will ever come close in clicks

    • @NextWorldVR
      @NextWorldVR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      That and Star Trek. My Beyond Antares animation has hundreds of thousands of views. Nothing else I do, even self aware AI Actors, comes even close.

    • @feraiivie
      @feraiivie หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@NextWorldVRbut the difference is both the those topics (the shining and Star Trek) have mass appeal across generations for views and so mass reach… the self aware AI is so far down the AI rabbit hole only creatives and builders can appreciate it … the public just want dopamine gold.
      Side note I visited your channel off the back of this comment and was blown away with the in character self aware AI. Contrary to a stupid comment, it is indeed of great value!!! Definitely helpful for me as I had a question about how AI could be leveraged for vlogging channels with such characters. Anyway now subscribed ❤

  • @i_accept_all_cookies
    @i_accept_all_cookies 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    It's rare that I'll sit through a video for an hour and a half, but this was extraordinary. I feel like I'm going to have to watch it again to fully absorb everything.

    • @jcole139
      @jcole139 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It was quite dense and conceptual.
      I’m with you.

    • @brian_b_music
      @brian_b_music 16 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      I enjoyed it as well, so engaging.

  • @MrJeffrey938
    @MrJeffrey938 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    The competition for the the best analysis of The Shining on TH-cam yields some of the most impressive videos I've seen. This is my favorite so far.

    • @aakkoin
      @aakkoin 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Just began watching, but hard to believe anyone could beat Rob Agers analysis' of The Shining and Kubricks other films

    • @MrJeffrey938
      @MrJeffrey938 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@aakkoin I'm on it! Thanks.

    • @aakkoin
      @aakkoin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrJeffrey938 You're welcome! "Collative Learning" is his channel/company, not "collective" but "collative"... Incredible stuff, makes Kubrick's films even deeper, they are full of subliminal and symbolic stuff, the man was a true genius.

    • @mlsaulnier
      @mlsaulnier หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@aakkoinRob Ager is always the Shining Master.

    • @AndSaveAsManyAsYouCan
      @AndSaveAsManyAsYouCan หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have you heard of media that is truth streamed?

  • @bcmelendrez100
    @bcmelendrez100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    Had to drop whatever video I was watching the second the notif popped up

  • @AmusedChild
    @AmusedChild 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    To (somewhat) answer your question of Jack's responsibility: he was vulnerable to the Overlook Hotel because of his bitterness and hatred, which are at the core his self-hatred. But at one time he was vulnerable to marrying, and having a child with, a woman he would later regard with contempt. Even before hurting Danny's arm he made a series of choices he regarded as "settling" for something "inferior" to his arrogant sense of superiority (fed by and feeding on his self-hatred). It's no surprise that he ultimately "settled for " a haunted, hate-filled hotel which emptied him, but he set out on this journey long before hurting Danny's arm by refusing to appreciate what he had and who he truly was.

    • @AliceBowie
      @AliceBowie 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jack was an alcoholic, and even worse, a "dry drunk" white knuckling it. It opened him up to possession, just like in Real Life.

  • @DE0498
    @DE0498 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    When I was watching this video my brother walked in and said that Shelly Duvall died today. I was shocked because this was recommended to me. RIP to her and condolences to her family

  • @rangerrecon
    @rangerrecon 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I always found it interesting that Jack breaks the 4th wall, albeit very briefly, throughout the movie by looking directly at the camera. For example, during his interview in the hotel manager's office and when he leaves their room after fighting with Wendy. This is Kubrick, so there is zero chance that these looks went unnoticed - they were intentional.
    I get chills everytime I watch the movie and hear Delbert say, "You've always been the caretaker. I should know, sir. I've always been here". The line is creepy and perplexing as you try to wrap your ahead around what you think is going on.

    • @CarloisBuriedAlive
      @CarloisBuriedAlive 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The fact that if you slow the movie down, he likely stares at the camera in every single scene is terrifying lol

    • @davbooms
      @davbooms หลายเดือนก่อน

      Grady says it in the book too

  • @shivalishankersharma1562
    @shivalishankersharma1562 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    I have consumed the shining content here on youtube at an unhealthy level and yours is by far, one of the bests video essays I have come across. Now I need to go to your channel and binge watch other videos

    • @feraiivie
      @feraiivie 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      All his Kubrick videos are amazing. Here for a second watch

    • @alexandermendez4653
      @alexandermendez4653 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Have you watched Collative Learning's videos? Those are my favorite.

    • @thedpsemporiumofdrumtracks5648
      @thedpsemporiumofdrumtracks5648 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@feraiivieagreed. The amount of detail Kubrick put into his films fuels some of the best takes by EOTM.

    • @brigettekorenek8135
      @brigettekorenek8135 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      So it’s not just me? 😂

    • @acliffy7939
      @acliffy7939 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@alexandermendez4653his vids are enjoyable but have much more of a tinfoil hat vibe

  • @jekw23
    @jekw23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    I’m of the opinion Kubrick does not have a definitive explanation. He didn’t make a puzzle to solve.
    But like David Lynch. You
    Experience it and make your own conclusions and you’re probably right.
    Everyone has their own interpretation, part of what I love about his movies.

    • @fire.walk.with.me.430
      @fire.walk.with.me.430 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      his films are much more about feeling than thinking a lot of the time

    • @mikeappleget482
      @mikeappleget482 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Kubrick intentionally makes his films ambiguous. But I also believe he has his personal explanations, that he chooses not to reveal -like many of the other great artists in history. I’ve listened to several Kubrick interviews and he always dodges giving definitive answers about his films. But there’s this one rare interview of Kubrick I listened to that was aired on some obscure Japanese radio station and he actually gave clear, definitive answers. He probably thought that no western audiences would ever hear that interview. Lol
      There was a lot of surprising information in that interview. Like when he mentions that he believes in ESP and as an example he talked about how he’ll just THINK about petting his cat and the cat will instantly get up and move. 😂

  • @mainelymaintaining
    @mainelymaintaining 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Here we go! The Shining has always been a favorite of mine. Deeply unsettling in ways you struggle to put your finger on, yet you can't look away. Always use the line "quietly going insane together" when recommending to others. Looking forward to hearing your take!

  • @danielrauch643
    @danielrauch643 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Man is consistently leagues beyond the standard of other film analysis channels.

    • @edpoe1108
      @edpoe1108 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      EOTM, Rob Ager and Jay Dyer are my Go-to for in depth film analysis-they approach the subject in a different way but they're all great.

    • @GtheMVP
      @GtheMVP 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Rob Ager is great, but his Shining content has awful audio/terrible mic. The spit and popping drive nuts lol

    • @edpoe1108
      @edpoe1108 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GtheMVP He should remaster that series and clean up the audio issues. It certainly would be worth it.

  • @anaccount8474
    @anaccount8474 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    There's so many ways of interpreting everything in this film. Even Danny's injury he gets in room 237. Maybe it was the crazy woman, maybe it was actually Jack, maybe Danny did it to himself whilst hypnotized by Tony, maybe it was something completely unknown.

    • @BobanN-gz2gj
      @BobanN-gz2gj 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@anaccount8474 Maybe it was crazy woman called Wendy.

  • @automatan
    @automatan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Every time that I watch one of your videos, one word always pops into my mind - 'elegant.' Thank you for shinny the light.

  • @sankturban291
    @sankturban291 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    15:38 what was Wendy supposed to think? Of course she would think that Jack did it. They’re in the middle of nowhere.

  • @Larkinchance
    @Larkinchance 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    You are a good writer... We are headed for hard times. Much of what we are familiar will disappear. Out of that will grow a new fiction. be a part of it.

    • @BobanN-gz2gj
      @BobanN-gz2gj 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Larkinchance Can you eleborate what do you mean by: "we are headed for hard times and much of what we are familiar will disappear."
      What kind of hard times we are headed for, what will disappear? Thank you

  • @tamarrajames3590
    @tamarrajames3590 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for another brilliant video essay. Kubrick was a rare genius in his work, and it takes a deep mind to venture into the layers and symbolism he carefully put into place with each film he crafted. Nothing in a Kubrick film is there by chance, or without meaning…everything exists to drive the intention of the film on every level of the viewer’s experience.
    I have seen other essays on the Shining, but none as sharply perceptive as yours, which I can say of your other works on his films. You have a deep understanding of the human psyche, and of the way Kubrick evoked such visceral feelings and responses from both his actors and his audience.
    Unlike most other Directors, Kubrick didn’t make any forgettable films, he gave each of his works the full breadth of his understanding of human nature, and the conflicting forces that shape and define how a given character will respond to the situation in which they find themselves. Your own perspective as a translator shares much in common with his. Bravo.🖤🇨🇦

  • @BubblegumCrash332
    @BubblegumCrash332 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The film that never stops giving.

  • @jpkoch427
    @jpkoch427 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Ill be back this weekend to watch this through. I hate that yt sucks at notifying me of this type of content so here is a comment to try to give it a little boost

  • @BurlapJohnW
    @BurlapJohnW 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Excellent work Emperor. This wisdom came at a crucial day in this father's life.

  • @SMtWalkerS
    @SMtWalkerS 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is fascinating. I read the book when it first came out, watched the movie, and enjoyed them. Although both scared me, they were merely pieces of entertainment to me. Over the years, listening to various and gradually more complex reviews and theories about "The Shining", I have found it engaging and mind expanding. Your analysis is particularly interesting. I find the quotes from Bonhoeffer to be really on point. Good job.

  • @marcoz5857
    @marcoz5857 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Beautiful video as always. I absolutely love your reviews. Please keep making those. God bless

  • @littlegreenman609
    @littlegreenman609 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    My theory for this movie is that jack is simply a look at danny's future as an adult, doomed to return to the very hotel his father almost murdered him in, and continuing the legacy by almost doing the same with his own family, an endless cycle of trauma and suffering, and a constant sense of deja vu he shall never figure out, until it is too late. Its all a big infinite loop, perhaps aided by the evil of the hotel , which could be seen as a symbol for america, and all the collective trauma it overlooks, causing them to resurface, eternally. Also explains what grady meant by jack having" always been the caretaker".
    I think this also explains that final imagee of jack. Its not jack, persay, but that of his father, and then by the end of the movie, it is his, and then the next time you watch the movie, it is danny's, and then his son's ,and then his son's ,and then his, and his, and his, and his, forever, and ever.
    And ever.
    Not taking doctor sleep into consideration, that is. Im pretty sure kubrick didnt as well.

    • @nycgweed
      @nycgweed 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ouch

    • @littlegreenman609
      @littlegreenman609 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nycgweed ?

    • @MatthewGill-nv4tb
      @MatthewGill-nv4tb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I'd say you're right. That's what i gathered after I read Kubrick mention it had to be watched simultaneously forward and backwards.......
      Sure there are people who've done that with the movie and it's visually striking. But I've never heard a good explanation.
      At the beginning when Danny is freaking out and drooling
      ...overlayed is the footage from the end/peak where it's like Danny is seeing what's happening. Jack with the axe slowly walking.... which throughout the movie there are scenes where actors were filmed moving backwards. So when the film is reversed they are moving forward.
      The ability to "shine" gives people that ability. Halloran halfway through realizes and also sees what's about to happen but he's too late.
      I wouldn't say it's a sad ending because Danny does learn that he can change his fate. Which to me was the end of the movie where he walks backwards in his tracks

    • @littlegreenman609
      @littlegreenman609 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MatthewGill-nv4tb i suppose watching the movie in that way is the only way to break the endless cycle. Who knows, its not like we can ask kubrick directly.
      And not like he would tell us anyways, cuz honestly that would just ruin the fun.

    • @MatthewGill-nv4tb
      @MatthewGill-nv4tb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @littlegreenman609 I get it but Kubrick ACTUALLY DID say that was the only way to watch the movie. It was I believe in a playboy interview

  • @thedpsemporiumofdrumtracks5648
    @thedpsemporiumofdrumtracks5648 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another home run breakdown by EOTM. One of the best channels out there that does Kubrick right every time. Phenomenal episode.

  • @midnightreader84
    @midnightreader84 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Shelley Duvall left us on July 11. She was an amazing actress in many films. She was 75 years old. Rest in peace, Shelley.

  • @joelwhite2361
    @joelwhite2361 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As always, incredible! Your commentary is excellent and thought-provoking. You encouraged me to revisit Stanley Kubrick after I decided he wasn't worth watching in undergrad. Now, I have such a deep respect for his work, and it's all thanks to you!

  • @El-Chad
    @El-Chad 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hey, love the shout-out to Rob ager. Good job, man!

  • @daregularperson
    @daregularperson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What an excellent video! I followed it closely and digested ideas from it - I found it very inspiring, and I’m glad you’ve included Bonhoeffer!

  • @jinaaaaa8080
    @jinaaaaa8080 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Nice work! I think the reason that Jack wasn’t angry with the mysterious woman-turned-corpse was he knew this woman from the past. The hotel returned a part of his memories that had been repressed: his past as someone who already had traded his soul with the devil. An alcoholic who literally had lived in the colonialist time. He may actually have known the woman in that hotel, but it is his memory. So there she was, an ugly bloated corpse. Jack was so familiar with the bartender (he seems to have owed a lot of souls to him), the hotel manager told him he was actually an owner(if I remember correctly), and also that his photo is on the wall of the Overlook (and indeed overlooked by all the characters in the film)-- all pointing out that he is something supernatural.

    • @Flash-sr8hm
      @Flash-sr8hm หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only in Kubrick's movie. In King's source material, there is a simple explanation. Everything is less ambiguous but still terrifying in the book.

  • @Megametalwolf
    @Megametalwolf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is a very solid essay, its orginal on a subject that has been donw to death. Great work and great essay. Well done

  • @regisphilbinsscrotum6631
    @regisphilbinsscrotum6631 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Always a good day when EOTM drops a vid!

  • @user-xj5mx5my4z
    @user-xj5mx5my4z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Danny has the "shinning" because the father was sexually abusing him. It is known as the "key of Solomon" , The creator warns NOT to pass your children through the fire.

    • @JWPanimation
      @JWPanimation 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yep Master K went really dark with this one and EWS but 99.995 of folks will never get the symbolism.

    • @user-xj5mx5my4z
      @user-xj5mx5my4z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JWPanimation don't know who Master K is.. Have you been following the Trump psyop, of him having to pay 454 million, but he'd be "pardoned" if he pays 175 million?

    • @bigrigJim
      @bigrigJim 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      you lost me at "the creator warns....." because that came from someones imagination for sure.

  • @matthewpaul6904
    @matthewpaul6904 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Kubrick's "The Shining"
    Cinema's glass onion.

    • @TupDigital
      @TupDigital 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I told you bout the Walrus and me man, you know that we're as close as could be man

    • @gregoryleonwatson8631
      @gregoryleonwatson8631 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Poor Steven King 😢
      It's Steve King that gives us The Shine in many short stories and King gives us the Dark One 😮 the notorious Man in Black. 🤔

  • @agostinodublino1387
    @agostinodublino1387 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've read and listened HOURS long about the Shining both book and movie... but this new video still worth watching! Very interesting!

  • @amandamcgraw4096
    @amandamcgraw4096 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent synthesis. This might be the best explanation of the themes I've seen. Thanks!

  • @wayfaringman8418
    @wayfaringman8418 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fascinating. You've helped me see this movie in a light even Collative Learning has been able to.

  • @pennyc11
    @pennyc11 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Some great observations. I can see the connections to events happening even today. Thanks for sharing more wisdom from Bonhoeffer. He was trying to survive in a world full of unimaginable violence and surreal turns of events. Looking at chaos from the outside, many of us will say, "this is utter madness". How can anyone chose to embrace such a destructive mindset? And yet, mobs of people did just that. Only some chose to escape it. Some felt the need to fight against it. While so many other chose to assimulate it into how they lived their lives.
    What is very sad is all it really took was a gun. A weapon, a message and a skilled orator to lead so many to act in ways so many of us would choose to fight against.
    Seeing this patten play over and over again in certain people's lives ...how little effort we have put into life in teaching these simple truths. How easy it is for one to fall into this sort of madness, when we have not given them the tools and resources to be successful in life. Not monetarily successful but morally good.
    Was Jack so resentful of his family? Or was it that his failure to reach his goals and be successful, overwhelmed him to the point that everything around him reminded him of his failures? Had he succeeded with his writing, would he have gone off of the deep end? As in the case of Germans whose desire for worldly successes, pretty things, grew into plans to take over and take away from those who had what they wanted? It was thievry on an epic scale.
    It reminds me of people, who are taught if one does this or that, riches, nice things will come to them. That they are entitled to these things. That even finding success at getting them through evil acts is acceptable because they did what others would never do to get there. So they rationalize that their actions are what others have done, which is true for too many, to have what most of us have come to value much less than they do.
    It is that they have turned off that part of their brain that would make them unhappy with the depravity and cruelty it requires to gain so much in order to feed their desires. They are unable to see any benefit in spreading the wealth because their happiness has been fueled by the collection of many expensive things. This need for satisfaction becomes their obsession.
    Desperation. Ah, as mentioned, despair can lead us to better choices or to evil madness. Both, only require opportunity, a desire and a plan. Why it is worth our efforts to help as many people as we can to create an exsistence that meets our basic needs.
    Crazy how the pendalum swings. In one extreme or towards the other one. That we still have so many people, who think that what they are doing is good, working too hard to disrupt what most of us desire most. Harmony. Security and the opportunity to make life enjoyable for us.

  • @LoneCloudHopper
    @LoneCloudHopper 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've been waiting a while for this one so I was very glad to see it today. I appreciate you for giving Rob Ager some credit too. He also opened my mind to the depths of this film. Fascinating subject--what Kubrick was really intending by this bizarre film, that is. One of my favs. Really enjoyed your video as usual. Please keep making vids. I love what you do.

    • @sabrinasjourney
      @sabrinasjourney 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It's was a Stephen King novel first. Kubrick didn't make it up 😂

    • @LoneCloudHopper
      @LoneCloudHopper 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@sabrinasjourney Yes I know. I thought everyone knew that.

  • @meimei8718
    @meimei8718 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like the way you are looking at this film. I feel like could watch it again with a fresh perspective. Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this.

  • @charlesp.8555
    @charlesp.8555 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    An incredible essay for one of the best movies of all time. Subbed!
    EDIT: this is probably the best video essay I have ever watched on this platform.

  • @cellyszn20
    @cellyszn20 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Dare i say that the scene where Wendy accused Jack of beating the son is the best commentary on domestic violence and us not witnessing anything

  • @happinesstan
    @happinesstan 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    An author creates a great story, not when he is unable to think, but when his thinking is unrestricted. That's why the author seeks isolation.

  • @torn-asunder
    @torn-asunder 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This analysis and the film itself is brilliance

  • @Andy-dh2sv
    @Andy-dh2sv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Ah, analysis of the Shining. This will be a great watch.

  • @doreybain
    @doreybain 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I remember when the movie came out. Almost everyone who read the book hated the movie.

    • @BobCrabtree-ev4rz
      @BobCrabtree-ev4rz หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Have to agree with you there.First time I read the novel,it scared hell out of me.Tried to watch the movie(twice)but only made it in about 20 minutes or so both times cos of the many,many changes.It was almost unrecognisable.I saw clips of random 'scary'scenes(that,of course,do not appear in the book)on tv movie review programs..Danny talking to his finger,elevator full of blood,creepy twins,"..Heeeeere's Jack!"...I'd kind of expect these things in a lower budget horror movie from a number of years of ago..or a satire.And let's not forget Jack Nicholson basically playing Jack Nicholson throughout the entire movie.Anyway..to each their own.If somebody else loved the movie..yeah okay.

    • @martinsorenson1055
      @martinsorenson1055 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was one of those people. The book was the scariest thing I had ever read (ok, so I was 13 at the time.) It was sheer terror. And then this dull, bizarre facsimile of the book comes out. And I was a fan of Kubrick, too! But I thought he had ventured into an area that he had no clue about. Over the years, I have come to appreciate the movie more. The TV adaptation was awful; unfortunately, that made people think the book was bad, and Kubrick was right in reducing it to a few scenes from the book.

  • @RideAcrossTheRiver
    @RideAcrossTheRiver 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Are the Twins really evil? They seem impish and creepy, but really, they warn Danny about the Overlook by showing the tragedy of the Grady girls and saying scary things.

    • @edpoe1108
      @edpoe1108 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I never got the impression that they were evil, I think they were just lonely and craved Danny's company.

    • @RideAcrossTheRiver
      @RideAcrossTheRiver 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@edpoe1108 But the Twins showed Danny what happened to the Grady girls. Was the elevator blood a warning too? From whom?

    • @BobanN-gz2gj
      @BobanN-gz2gj 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@RideAcrossTheRiver The Twins ARE Grady's twins. Blood elevator may easily be blood of native americans on whose cemetary The Overlook hotel was built.

    • @RideAcrossTheRiver
      @RideAcrossTheRiver 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@BobanN-gz2gj Except the Grady children were ages eight and ten.

    • @BobanN-gz2gj
      @BobanN-gz2gj 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@RideAcrossTheRiver Except they are not actually twins in the book. Kubrick's Grady sisters are twins only because he wanted to point out duality of everything. Remember mirrors. As above so below.
      The Twins ABSOLUTELY are Gradys sisters. Who else they could be?
      They are neither completely good nor completely evil as they tried to burn The Overlook Hotel and end The Overlook bad influence which makes them good.
      But on the other hand because of their destiny they are destined to stay in The Overlook hotel forever (or at least until the end of the world) and they desperately want/need company. This is why they say to Danny: "come and play with us" but still show him the price for that.
      Remember doctor saying to Wendy: "kids can scare you to death". Interesting choice of words.
      What a film. Absolutely the best horror movie of all-time and one of the best 50 movies of all time.

  • @carolhowley7158
    @carolhowley7158 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for putting this together. One point. When Kubrick talked about Grady releasing Jack from the pantry, he is referring to his thoughts on the novel. See Rob Ager's video about other ways Jack may have exited the pantry. Most Sincerely, Chris Howley, Wollaston, MA

  • @davidjarred
    @davidjarred 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What a beautiful analysis, thank you for sharing this. It is remarkable that the nature of evil is to attempt to lure the innocent and pure into its guise, however there are always telltale signs which reflect its true nature, and the discerning and pure student is able to muster up their inner faith to perceive truth and holiness in the wake of lies and falsehood.

  • @brettspeeler7166
    @brettspeeler7166 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One of the best interpretations of The Shining I have seen so far!

    • @deanwhite890
      @deanwhite890 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes. Totally agree. It’s brilliant.

  • @MP-fh4xo
    @MP-fh4xo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is a great video! If you ever came back to the topic, perhaps you’d consider a comparison with the book as King did not care for the movie and the book has some big insights into these scenes that give them a lot more context than the film. The differences between the two versions are really interesting!

  • @melancholoid
    @melancholoid 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome Vid!
    Thank You very much for Your Work! Greetings from Germany

  • @latindoggy8059
    @latindoggy8059 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Masterpiece of a video!

  • @SillyWillyFan47
    @SillyWillyFan47 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Started with easy shallows and luring me to wade out past my depth far off into the deep! Nice exploration of premonition a narrative device, Father son dualism, Kipling's Poem, Desire, Intelligent Evil, external Salvation, Suffering, and the power of innocence played over Wendy & Danny wandering in the Maze.

  • @marcusmiller5443
    @marcusmiller5443 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The transformation of Siren to Crone symbolizes Jack's fate being sealed.

  • @jonathanfeldheim6554
    @jonathanfeldheim6554 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video. The Shining is amazing, 45 years later there's still an ocean of interpretations that are fresh, interesting, diverse and don't take away from anything else already divined from the movie; like this one. Is there any other movie like that?

  • @genburke2656
    @genburke2656 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Jack looks into camera so frequently that Kubrick could not have wanted it any other way. Anyone that views the film is a ghost. And Jack sees us plainly.

  • @PickledRed
    @PickledRed 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Jack uses the phrase "white man's burden" to express his frustrations and grievances, particularly about his family responsibilities and perceived societal pressures. His casual and somewhat mocking use of the phrase contrasts sharply with its historical connotations, underscoring his deteriorating mental state and his growing disconnection from reality and social norms.

  • @intellectually_lazy
    @intellectually_lazy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    that's odd; the blood usually gets off on the second floor

  • @MatthewGill-nv4tb
    @MatthewGill-nv4tb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Did you know Stanleys dads name was Jacques but went by Jack

    • @Marc-dj5fk
      @Marc-dj5fk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Did you know that the actor who played Jack was also called Jack? Ooooh, spooky 👻😂

    • @MatthewGill-nv4tb
      @MatthewGill-nv4tb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Marc-dj5fk hey now.... I just thought it was interesting.... I could have gone full tard and explained the gematria and numerical codes

    • @Marc-dj5fk
      @Marc-dj5fk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@MatthewGill-nv4tb also the hotel that inspired Stephen king to write the shining was called the STANLEY hotel. Yea, people have names 🤷

    • @MatthewGill-nv4tb
      @MatthewGill-nv4tb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Marc-dj5fk I have a hemorrhoid named Marc-dj5fk

    • @jakejoseph5534
      @jakejoseph5534 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Honestly, there’s no way that ain’t the main reason Jack Torrence resonated with Kubrick when he read the book. The film is deeply personal, to the filmmaker as much as to the viewer. Danny = Stanley

  • @marcusmiller5443
    @marcusmiller5443 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    "Just following Orders."
    The Order hidden excuse, obfuscated by the double entendre, to create confusion, which leads to easier compliance. Of course Jack follows. He's ALL about the Work, isn't he?

  • @gabrielseanwallace3979
    @gabrielseanwallace3979 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What a treat! 🙂

  • @ToGuyFor
    @ToGuyFor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great observations, good listen.

  • @jodown5584
    @jodown5584 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for this video. 🙏

  • @AdamPentz-ct2hn
    @AdamPentz-ct2hn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I've been to Timberline Lodge so many times, and it feels pretty tiny when you're there. So, it's so creepy for me even when Danny's just riding around the hotel at the beginning. Also, Timberline Lodge as literally at the tree line of a volcanic cone: there is no place at all for a hedge maze - there's barely room for a parking lot!

    • @crybabychrononaut
      @crybabychrononaut หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Timberline was solely used for external shots... The inside of Timberline was not used at all. A different lodge, as well as soundstages built in London, made the interior of the Overlook.

  • @HandsomeSteveJacobson
    @HandsomeSteveJacobson 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is the best analysis I’ve ever seen

  • @davebland8489
    @davebland8489 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fascinating analysis, really enjoyed it.

  • @cullenworkman9975
    @cullenworkman9975 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video!

  • @irb1138
    @irb1138 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Given the discussion of patterns in the end and the crazy geometry of the hotel, I was surprised that you didn't cover the changing patterns in the carpet, especially when Danny is rolled the ball. It's when that pattern changes that he's traumatized by Room 237, for instance. But there's still so much depth to this film that perhaps covering everything would yield a 4 hour video.

  • @tennysonturbeville2745
    @tennysonturbeville2745 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I spend a lot of time watching film analysis and your stuff on the matrix and Kubrick is as great as Rob Ager I rarely learn something new with the shining this was amazing please make one for matrix resurrections truly great work good form sir

  • @Generalfund
    @Generalfund 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    9:29 - Notice the Tang, dried powder kool aid...in a freezer? Kubrick put so much in the details here. We are in a Wendy halucination when we see inconsistencies in reality, like Tang in a freezer and light switches that change location...

    • @jakejoseph5534
      @jakejoseph5534 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      AKA the misogynistic interpretation

  • @kathym1980
    @kathym1980 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    In terms of intelligence.. we must acknowledge that Jack is on the descent to madness and in this looses his ability to rationalise, that is why Danny was able to do his thing in the maze.. while Jack was solely focused on his intent to kill Danny while Danny is in a fight for his life... it is very clever of Danny maybe he saw it on TV... an earlier reference to the conversation on the way to the overlook regarding cannibalism....

    • @anonymous-iy5pd
      @anonymous-iy5pd 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes, he was watching the road runner at an earlier point in the movie

  • @ThinkForYourself1972
    @ThinkForYourself1972 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This straddles a fine line between thought-provoking and. . .
    Brilliant.

  • @ianm2170
    @ianm2170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm always amazed that the moon landing was in 1969 [I watched it in the middle of the night when I was 11...Patrick Moore, jabbering on, but people talk more about this movie's conspiracy theories than they do about the actual event. What a crazy world

  • @rangerrecon
    @rangerrecon 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Regarding the spatial inconsistencies, such as the doors that would go to rooms that can't exist because of the Colorado Lounge, we have to look at how Kubrick looked at cinematography. One actor who worked with Kubrick (who was getting frustrated with doing 60 or 70 takes for a scene like Kubrick was infamous for) commented after finishing a scene that he thought it was a "good" take. Kubrick responded, "Good is nice; interesting is better." Kubrick wanted the symmetry of the opposing doors in the hallway and didn't care that, logically, the rooms couldn't exist.
    Think about how that hallway would look with doors only on one side. It's boring and lacks symmetry. It isn't 'interesting'.

  • @joeybeargrooves4ever
    @joeybeargrooves4ever 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    3:05 Who's that coming out from behind Jack as he tours the Gold Room for the first time?

    • @edpoe1108
      @edpoe1108 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well, one thing we know for sure is that it isn't the caretaker. YOU are the caretaker-you've always been the caretaker. I should know, I've always been here...

  • @IdwarfRedwoods
    @IdwarfRedwoods 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Once again, you are, by far, the best film analyst on youtube

  • @edcliffe2988
    @edcliffe2988 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Kubrik was stated as saying that this film is a story about a family that slowly goes insane up in the mountains. I think that this is true, but what Kubrik does not mention, but is completely plausible, is that this is a story that Jack writes. The Torrence family in the film and the Torrence family in Jack's book are paralleled throughout the film. Some of what we see is happening, and other shots are happening only in Jack's book. We are not informed when Kubrik bounces from one to the other. The discrepancies can easily be chalked up to Jack taking poetic license. The two girls that Ullman tells Jack about were ages 8 and 10. The girls in Jack's book are twins. Charles Grady becomes Delbert Grady. The 10-year-old crime in the film feels more like it's decades old in Jack's book. The typewriter changes colour, The hinges on the storeroom change from one side of the door to the other within the same scene. All kinds of examples.

  • @crypton4903
    @crypton4903 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don’t believe Wendy actually holds anything against Jack about Danny. It is just in Jack’s mind that she does. When she comes to the hasty conclusion it is Jack that must’ve hurt Danny it presses Jack’s button to unknowingly because she soon after runs to Jack telling him that it was someone else that hurt Danny even though it is very very unlikely. When she tells the Doctor about Jack hurting Danny she honestly says what she believes in that it was the alcohol not Jack which shows us the truth of Wendy’s position. When Jack tells Lloyd she never has let it down we see the truth of what only Jack believes. This is the rift between Wendy and Jack that isn’t really shared between them. This wedge only pushes Jack further. This is why Wendy doesn’t understand why Jack is so hostile toward her from interrupting his work, she never sees there is separation between them let alone an ever growing one. Wendy is a dunce. And when Jack tells her there’s no one else in the Hotel and it’s Danny own internal problem Wendy doesn’t fall back on that it must have been Jack that hurt him. This again shows Wendy’s genuineness in not holding anything against Jack. Jack however holds it against her that she holds things against him showing projection from his perspective that he thinks himself to be inept and treats Wendy this way because he can fool her that there aren’t anyone else in the hotel.
    Not sure that Rudyard Kipling’s poem White Man’s Burden isn’t actually a critique on imperialism. The Shining certainly is about the never ending cycle of imperial bloodshed and is also a critique of it. You can’t call it a racist film because the N-word is used by Mr. Grady.

    • @tamarrajames3590
      @tamarrajames3590 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Jack’s contempt for Wendy is rooted in the fact that SHE was imperceptive enough to settle for him as a life partner. He knows he lacks the things he considers important in a man, and any woman that would accept him is therefore worthy only of contempt. Neither Jack nor Wendy shows the slightest sign of loving each other…he settled for a passive woman who would have him, and she settled for the only man she thought would ever ask for her. Danny is the only thing that holds them together.🖤🇨🇦

  • @simon314man
    @simon314man 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting to see that you use a couple of parts of the movie that weren’t in the version released in Australia (or Europe?) in the cinema back in the day. The most noticeable were the Doctor scene with Wendy and Wendy’s vision of skeletons in the hotel - both not present when I first saw the film back in the cinema, and on my Kubrick Blu-Ray box set. The 4K UHD disc was the first time I saw the US version, makes it a slightly different film. The interview at the beginning is also noticeably shorter in the non-US version. So without those scenes I come at this film as one more centred on Jack and his descent into madness via the evil that exists in the Overlook Hotel. He was a weak man, with flaws that made him susceptible to the evil in the hotel, while other people weren’t, such as Dick Hallorann.

  • @rosameltrozo5889
    @rosameltrozo5889 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    21:37 So Kipling was 100% spot on basically

  • @maxxtechnique3997
    @maxxtechnique3997 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Well done.

  • @casehardening
    @casehardening 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I actually just finished the movie so this is pretty much perfect to get a gist of what’s going on in the outlook hotel!

  • @UkraineJames2000
    @UkraineJames2000 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great content, as always.

  • @Alton4
    @Alton4 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    gems like that deserve so much more noticing

  • @themysteryofbluebirdboulevard
    @themysteryofbluebirdboulevard 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Forensics deals not in innocence, but guilt

  • @WSTL1
    @WSTL1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks...Ullman literally gives Jack the ''thumbs up'' gesture while recounting the the horrific violence that took place in the hotel, smiling while warning him of the dangers of isolation. Jack seems unperturbed. As to reincarnation Danny rides the big wheel...a metaphor for The Wheel of Life.. the cycle of birth and rebirth and existence in samsara? The Hell Realm is depicted as a place partly of fire and partly of ice. In the fiery part of the realm, Hell Beings (Narakas) are subjected to pain and torment. In the icy part, they are frozen.
    Interpreted psychologically, Hell Beings are recognized by their acute aggression. Fiery Hell Beings are angry and abusive, and they drive away anyone who would befriend or love them. Icy Hell Beings shove others away with their unfeeling coldness. Then, in the torment of their isolation, their aggression increasingly turns inward, and they become self-destructive.

  • @tankndg26
    @tankndg26 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Im obsessed with this movie, i seen every Rob's analysis videos...i most say your video was amazing! Your deep dive made me watch it twice! ❤❤❤ good job sir 🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @unkleluc
    @unkleluc 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    i was 4 years old when i saw this film and i been peeling the layers ever since(36)

  • @audrey1731
    @audrey1731 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Jack is okay with the woman being there since he thinks the hotel will give him gifts!!

  • @Mandibil
    @Mandibil 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A true masterpiece

  • @johnwatts8346
    @johnwatts8346 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    it is odd / interesting how the film makes people obsess about it,

  • @usedscar
    @usedscar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great comments and fantastic analysis. I have only one thing to add- if you love this movie you'll love the book. Dr Sleep as well.

  • @mikerivera7509
    @mikerivera7509 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Excellent video

  • @CharcoChoc
    @CharcoChoc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing analysis

  • @devonmarcus101
    @devonmarcus101 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video

  • @Forget1987
    @Forget1987 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This has almost a perfect analysis of the movie