@@arrestingdevelopments1764 I will watch that updated version! My wife is from Norway, so I'm sort of plugged in to Scandinavia a bit more than average. My wife works in child safeguarding, and I remember talking to a media lawyer in Sweden who told me that ch@ld p@rn was legal for 7 (or so) years in Denmark, in the late 70s and early 80s, due to a loophole in the law. He stated that a lot of the CP in "circulation" comes from period. That's so alien it's hard to believe. I come from Britain, and "hardcore" was illegal there until I was about 25, or so (currently 44).
well it might help if adults or inappropriate adults never ever ever had access to children instead of anybody here and there or any tom,dick or harry teenage parents letting someone who they've only met twice babysit their kids.
@@arrestingdevelopments1764 good man.over here it's so slack,it's not true.anybody can waltz into a junior school.unemployed penniless teenagers restless to go out and have fun because they're not even drinking age,getting neighbours in the same tower block to babysit their children.young women letting useless wasters sleep overnight in their homes!the social services as useless as the jobcentres,council's and the law.morons all over the country,who shouldn't be left unsupervised when using a plastic peashooter being allowed to have children and pets,in damp,squalid housing condition and mindless endless poverty!just infantile moronic clueless decisions!
You seem to not like abuse and i have an idea about how to stop abuse! We can evaluate people if they want children like how we evaluate people for guns and being police officers. Good idea right?
@@arrestingdevelopments1764 But why manufacture an "opportunity" that would cause one to sin just to get that person to sin? I think part of the reason it's done is for LEOs to get their arrest numbers up and for ADAs to to get their conviction rates up. I don't believe in manipulating people or tempting people into committing a sin (which they might, possibly, not otherwise have committed). Although I am not a religious person (I'm an agnostic atheist), I do agree with the whole "Thou shalt not cause others to sin" commandment. In any case, I'm not into child porn. In fact, I am repulsed by the mere idea of idea. I was merely looking at the issue from a philosophical point of view and, perhaps, playing a bit of devil's advocate... 😈😏😌
@@arrestingdevelopments1764 Police have also posed as gay men looking for sex in public places to get gay men (who, in many cases, were not looking to have sex in public places) to have sex in public places just to arrest them. Many civil rights activists have agreed that this sort of entrapment is predatory and encourages people to offend who would not, otherwise, have offended. I know the two situations are different (as the latter case involves adults only) but the principle is still the same. We can't say for certain if the offender would have offended had he not been tempted into offending... 🤔
@@langleywallingford260 The goal of undercover stings (whether it's child porn, drug sales, prostitution, etc.) are to deter people who want to commit the crime from actually committing the crime due to the unknown factor of whether they are engaging with another criminal or with an undercover officer. In the case of child porn, it's one of the few effective ways to catch offenders.
@@langleywallingford260 Either way, there's a BIG difference between giving someone an opportunity to commit a crime (legal) and inducing someone to commit a crime (illegal entrapment). Nobody thinks undercover police should be allowed to induce people to commit crimes, and courts have routinely ruled against police who try to do such.
![HIWWHEE | OHM [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OJJLtTLqLag/mqdefault.jpg)
Wonder why this got a big recommendations bump recently?
I don't know, but I wish it would hit my other videos.... Especially the updated version of this exact same lecture!
@@arrestingdevelopments1764 I will watch that updated version! My wife is from Norway, so I'm sort of plugged in to Scandinavia a bit more than average. My wife works in child safeguarding, and I remember talking to a media lawyer in Sweden who told me that ch@ld p@rn was legal for 7 (or so) years in Denmark, in the late 70s and early 80s, due to a loophole in the law. He stated that a lot of the CP in "circulation" comes from period. That's so alien it's hard to believe. I come from Britain, and "hardcore" was illegal there until I was about 25, or so (currently 44).
Why do we see naked children in normal anatomy books if its illegal?
Are you for real?? The cops need to look at you.
well it might help if adults or inappropriate adults never ever ever had access to children instead of anybody here and there or any tom,dick or harry teenage parents letting someone who they've only met twice babysit their kids.
The problem is, it's usually impossible to tell whether someone is an appropriate adult or inappropriate adult until it's too late.
@@arrestingdevelopments1764 good man.over here it's so slack,it's not true.anybody can waltz into a junior school.unemployed penniless teenagers restless to go out and have fun because they're not even drinking age,getting neighbours in the same tower block to babysit their children.young women letting useless wasters sleep overnight in their homes!the social services as useless as the jobcentres,council's and the law.morons all over the country,who shouldn't be left unsupervised when using a plastic peashooter being allowed to have children and pets,in damp,squalid housing condition and mindless endless poverty!just infantile moronic clueless decisions!
I wish you actually knew what you’re talking about
Yeah, if only...
Thanks for educating people
You seem to not like abuse and i have an idea about how to stop abuse! We can evaluate people if they want children like how we evaluate people for guns and being police officers. Good idea right?
Posing as a child when you're an adult to get someone to agree to meet you for sex sounds a bit like entrapment... 🤨
That's not entrapment. That's just opportunity. They are completely different.
@@arrestingdevelopments1764 But why manufacture an "opportunity" that would cause one to sin just to get that person to sin? I think part of the reason it's done is for LEOs to get their arrest numbers up and for ADAs to to get their conviction rates up. I don't believe in manipulating people or tempting people into committing a sin (which they might, possibly, not otherwise have committed). Although I am not a religious person (I'm an agnostic atheist), I do agree with the whole "Thou shalt not cause others to sin" commandment. In any case, I'm not into child porn. In fact, I am repulsed by the mere idea of idea. I was merely looking at the issue from a philosophical point of view and, perhaps, playing a bit of devil's advocate... 😈😏😌
@@arrestingdevelopments1764 Police have also posed as gay men looking for sex in public places to get gay men (who, in many cases, were not looking to have sex in public places) to have sex in public places just to arrest them. Many civil rights activists have agreed that this sort of entrapment is predatory and encourages people to offend who would not, otherwise, have offended. I know the two situations are different (as the latter case involves adults only) but the principle is still the same. We can't say for certain if the offender would have offended had he not been tempted into offending... 🤔
@@langleywallingford260 The goal of undercover stings (whether it's child porn, drug sales, prostitution, etc.) are to deter people who want to commit the crime from actually committing the crime due to the unknown factor of whether they are engaging with another criminal or with an undercover officer. In the case of child porn, it's one of the few effective ways to catch offenders.
@@langleywallingford260 Either way, there's a BIG difference between giving someone an opportunity to commit a crime (legal) and inducing someone to commit a crime (illegal entrapment). Nobody thinks undercover police should be allowed to induce people to commit crimes, and courts have routinely ruled against police who try to do such.