LEGO Marvel Ultimate Hulkbuster: Enormous & not THAT bad | set 76210

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2022
  • Independent, #NotSponsored, unscripted fan review of the 2022 LEGO Marvel Hulkbuster, 4049 pcs. £474.99 / $549.99 / 549.99€
    📺 See me live on Twitch: / thejang
    🏙 My LEGO city: / jangcity
    ▶️ Chill real-time LEGO builds: / purebuilds
    ⏩ Speed build time lapses: / jangbuilds
    🟠 Become a supporter on Patreon! / jangbricks
    Join the community for exclusive chat streams, get your minifig added to New Jang City, & more!
    My preferred online shop is Amazon: amzn.to/2qllzg5
    * If you use my affiliate links I may get a tiny commission to help keep the channels going!
    More places I shop: www.jangbricks.com/where-i-shop
    LEGO news & set research: www.Brickset.com
    All comments are moderated to maintain a safe, positive environment. Bad behavior is rejected, abusers are reported & blocked. jangbricks.com/commentpolicy
    ✔️ Answers to Frequently Asked Questions: www.jangbricks.com/FAQ
    📷 Instagram: jangbricks4real
    🐤 Twitter: JangBricks
    🌐 Web: JANGBRiCKS.com
    All of my verified media accounts: www.jangbricks.com/verified
    (Assume anything else is fake!)
    The opinions I express are mine and mine alone and not for sale for any price. Ads, when shown, are selected & placed by TH-cam itself.
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 155

  • @mauzer8k805
    @mauzer8k805 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    Imo if you pay an absurd high premium price, you should expect a perfect premium product

    • @MartenFerret
      @MartenFerret ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you need 1:1, then Monogram is more your thing than Lego. Just how I see it.

    • @mauzer8k805
      @mauzer8k805 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@MartenFerret not interested in marvel at all, but i dont like the direction lego is heading to

  • @undead.rising
    @undead.rising ปีที่แล้ว +100

    You could spend $50 more and get the UCS Razor Crest, which has several desirable minifigures, over 2000 more pieces, and an overall more polished appeal. Its insides are also at the top of its game.

    • @ferzwither
      @ferzwither ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Technically the razor crest cost the same bcs you have to buy the iron man figure ($40-$50) to have this set complete... Not worth this Hulkbuster

  • @frostedbutts4340
    @frostedbutts4340 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    'Not that bad' doesn't cut it for $550!

  • @fakeflash0794
    @fakeflash0794 ปีที่แล้ว +168

    To think the Eiffel Tower is almost as tall as 3 of these standing on top of each other…

    • @stam7250
      @stam7250 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      And much more value

    • @mrm0ngoose773
      @mrm0ngoose773 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      And not that much more expensive

  • @superlee091
    @superlee091 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    The build process might be designed for the new comers but the price is not made for new comers... and for something at this price range, perfection is the only thing there can be

  • @AldenG
    @AldenG ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Lego really loves making these ridiculously-expensive mammoth sets nowadays.

  • @Bass-mx3iw
    @Bass-mx3iw ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Oddly the most positive review I’ve seen on this set. Also didn’t see any discolored dark red which is good

  • @Masterbuildermax
    @Masterbuildermax ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is why Jang is the best Lego reviewer. On TH-cam.

  • @KenTails
    @KenTails ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Big single piece dome for the head feels a bit.. wrong or out of place, when everything else is built up with smaller parts.

  • @DarthBear356
    @DarthBear356 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This set just baffles me...
    I hate the "who asked for this" comments normally, but here I think this comment has a point. Who is this made for? Do Lego genuinely believe people are willing to shell out $550 for a huge Hulkbuster mech that is not accurate to the film, limited articulation that limits displayability, and 5x the price of other much more compact but better designed mechs?
    I hate how so many hard-core lego fans will slam designers online for being 'lazy' or 'not caring', from what I've seen of Lego designers, they are incredibly passionate and dedicated to what they do, and work so hard to make each model fun to build and play with. But here? I just don't get how this went so wrong...

  • @amelieandersen8371
    @amelieandersen8371 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Jang wearing a the 'GOAT' top..nice one

  • @samuraibricks
    @samuraibricks ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Thanks for the review Jang! As someone who loves mechs of all varieties, I do applaud Lego for managing to build such an incredibly large model and make it stand tall on its own feet. The real killer for me is the price, and that has as much to do with how objectively expensive it is as the relatively poor price-per-piece ratio. This is not something that I could afford as a casual Marvel fan and I'm sure a lot of people would feel similar about this set. The decision to accommodate the buildable Iron Man figure was definitely the wrong one. An idea that sounded cool in the conference room perhaps, but definitely contributed to the underachievement of this Hulkbuster set that simply needs to be perfect in order to sell.

  • @DZstudios.
    @DZstudios. ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jang is the GOAT

  • @TiagoCatarino
    @TiagoCatarino ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I was so excited about this release but my hopes were busted

  • @akivaplutno
    @akivaplutno ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wow Jang you went easy on it in the beginning. I'm with you in this, some things you just can't unsee

  • @theaces3697
    @theaces3697 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    i dont really get the torso being the biggest issues - for me when comparing to the real thing or the hot toys model is the shoulders, waist, legs and ankles are all VERY wrong with most being far to skinny - i think if it wasnt meant to be the hulkbuster it would be a pretty amazing mech

  • @YoungestGo1st
    @YoungestGo1st ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Thank you Jang for your (wallet's) sacrifice.

  • @lija8765
    @lija8765 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    it just looks like an infant. the legs are too thin and connect too far apart, and the bolbous shape is reminiscent of a diaper. together with the thin ankles... it's an ironbaby suit

  • @isaachunsberger2484
    @isaachunsberger2484 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    In my opinion i think this honestly might be the worst set ever. There are so many reasons that i say that. For one, it looks extremely over prices, even by the price hike standards. The details and proportions are horribly off. Ive watched reviews that talked about small details falling off with the slightest movement. The gaps on this build are insane, and im saying that as someone who is a lot less picky than other LEGO fans. The Tony stark minifigure looks like it came from a $10 juniors set. The light bricks are orange rather than blue. There was a UCS style hulkbuster before, which wasn't that popular to begin with, so they decided to sell one 4x the price. This is the largest Marvel set ever, and they decided to design it around the idea of putting the Iron man figure inside. That $40 Iron man set was one of the worst sets in the wave, so the designed a $550 set to help make a $40 shelf warming set more appealing. Perhaps the biggest issue with this set is what it isn't. This set could've been so many other things, a Helicarrier, X mansion, Avengers tower. Literally no one was asking for a hulkbuster. I know calling this the worse set ever might be harsh, but it checks so many boxes

  • @theGhostfaceKiller666
    @theGhostfaceKiller666 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    550$ is like a lifetime of Mcchickens!!

  • @concon09090
    @concon09090 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    For the price of two Perfect Grade Gundams, this is insanely overpriced

  • @biodude15
    @biodude15 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Comparing it to the picture at 3:47, here's what I see:
    The midriff section where it curves into the waist before jutting out at the hips, just isn't there in the original
    There should be armor under the shoulder pauldrons, which should point down along the bicep, and themselves should stick up further
    The shins don't have plating that covers the ankles
    The pecs are too tall, and the moving the arc reactor with them should help fix where it sits, though relative to the hips, it sits at an appropriate height
    The feet look a bit too long.
    The pauldrons might be able to be fixed if you remove the cross axle and connect them directly to the shoulder, and move the armor up a stud. That would give room to have a small amount of plates cover the upper shoulder.
    The pecs and midriff would require major changes to the build
    Adding plates to the sides of the shins might help, though they would need to wrap around a bit to cover the front of the ankles
    Shortening the feet may cause stability issues.

  • @davisjaeger7433
    @davisjaeger7433 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I think sets like this are designed primarily for Lego fans who also happen to like marvel or iron man. The primary selling point is a large Lego set that looks cool, not movie accuracy. The building experience is arguably the most important part, so comparing it to a solid display figure it’s t really fair.

  • @jacobmcmillan6787
    @jacobmcmillan6787 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love how massive it is

  • @Howlox
    @Howlox ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm not an entitled Lego buyer either (I'll be honest, they realllly annoy me) but I must say, I was surprised by the complete lack of leg articulation. If Lego had made a figure this big and it could pose, that would be some feat. But this is just a static display piece. I'm not sure what to think of it. I understand the building process may have been great, but for me their needs to be value after its built too.

  • @lbricks7631
    @lbricks7631 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    $850 Australian... I know thats a good exchange rate, but who's gonna pay that much for a glorified mech.

  • @kibavee3295
    @kibavee3295 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Its very strange to me that they devoted such a large amount of resources on a play feature like that on a static display piece, especially at the cost of its overall look. And for the $40 extra set you need for this one, they should have either thrown one in with this guy, or made a special exclusive printed head for the $40 figure included

    • @Howlox
      @Howlox ปีที่แล้ว

      "especially at the cost of its overall look". As Jang said, the space for the $40 dollar is not what makes the outside look bad. There was the potential to design it accurate around that space, and I have to agree.

  • @mbphilipblack8993
    @mbphilipblack8993 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    My thoughts were why not just buy the Hot Toys version or the Sideshow collectables version i would still rather spend the aftermarket prices for those movie accurate versions and for the price i'd stick to the UCS star wars line

  • @alterego2275
    @alterego2275 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Nice that someone bought it so we don't have to. Terrible set!

  • @memesarekeem
    @memesarekeem ปีที่แล้ว +12

    WOW this thing is hideous!

  • @captain-brickhead8317
    @captain-brickhead8317 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Terrible design which compromises the appearance for an unwanted play feature.

  • @gumbycat5226
    @gumbycat5226 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think the set would be a whole lot better if it had posable legs because then I could possibly have it sit on a bookshelf whereas it would be quite hard for me to find a place for it in my home.
    When you quote price, it's always worth remembering that some countries, like Australia, have the sales tax added in whereas in other countries, like Canada and the USA, the price is before sales tax. People think that Lego charges more in Australia (where I live) but it is often more expensive in the USA when you add the tax.

  • @TaRgEt0ZeRo
    @TaRgEt0ZeRo ปีที่แล้ว +8

    everytime i look at it, ....... what a missing opportunity, legs awsome, but the rest is weird

  • @hajkie
    @hajkie ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You get an instant like for the not sponsored statement. Thats expensive xD

  • @Metalizer
    @Metalizer ปีที่แล้ว +1

    18:02 "What is it good for? Absolutely nothing, just say it again" xD xD

  • @hunter4229
    @hunter4229 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This just plain doesn't look right. The torso and shoulders are the worst part to me. I wouldn't mind the price if it was exceptionally made, quite a disappointment after how good Optimus Prime was. Like I know they are different mostly in terms of scale, but Optimus was spot on while this is just wrong in so many ways.

  • @coffeeinhandproductions3238
    @coffeeinhandproductions3238 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Solid review, and fairly accurate to what works/doesn't work here. Personally not a fan of the direction Lego took overall, however no argument that the build process looks super fun, and it has enormous presence on display.

  • @alexchou1984
    @alexchou1984 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sweet! I didn't know Jang was into Gundams too!

  • @brickfairie
    @brickfairie ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This isn't a set for me but I just love you're reviews! Great as always!

  • @smhcoolguy5024
    @smhcoolguy5024 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the review 🙏

  • @mastterby
    @mastterby ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Totally agree with you about casual fans

  • @_Pikalika_
    @_Pikalika_ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    that's a big one

  • @cobbss1405
    @cobbss1405 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    great review! but the thing is, for 550$ I don't think it has the right to be "okay" or "decent" for that price I thin we should get the best of the best when forking over that much

  • @migatron1
    @migatron1 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great review, JANG. It's not the car crash everyone made it out to be but, I think there's more value in the Hot Toys Hulkbuster, imo. If you're going for the ultimate Hulkbuster display piece

  • @villelepoaho4105
    @villelepoaho4105 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have to say, it's not as bad as I initially thought. Still not worth $550, though. I would definitely wait for a discount.

  • @parker_smith72
    @parker_smith72 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Would've been cooler if the $10-15 minifugure series of mechs was in it
    Set 76203 or 76140.

  • @IG88IGLOO.
    @IG88IGLOO. ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I don't understand what this set is supposed to be. The light bricks might as well not even be there if they can't all light up at the same time. The Iron man figure inside is interesting but that will get old in two minutes. If the gimmick is the size then you should just get the UCS Falcon... Compared to all of the Nintendo adult sets they all have very interesting gimmicks for a quarter of the price. You show this thing to someone and there's just no wow factor here. You look at it, turn on the yellow lights, move the arms and you walk away.

  • @empatheticrambo4890
    @empatheticrambo4890 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As always I appreciate your unsponsored perspective, and I agree with you how the torso doesn't look quite right. But you've got extra insight now that you've got it in person, and I can live vicariously through your review.

  • @dannypopovic2419
    @dannypopovic2419 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    "Not that bad" is not good enough for the price

  • @alterego2275
    @alterego2275 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    It's s terrible and overpiced set, what else can be said about it.

  • @redheads604
    @redheads604 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    the ankles and shoulder look so off

  • @GoingHamAllTheWay
    @GoingHamAllTheWay ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I mean it looks nice but tbh if I was to buy one of these for a display why would I get this and not the metal casted models with those magnets to pose mid assembly or in any position really, just a realistic thought

  • @pauldeddens5349
    @pauldeddens5349 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I think this is unacceptable as far as quality and gimmicks go.
    Casual fan, its badly proportioned. I dont care for marvel that much, the Hulkbuster is pretty much the only thing I really enjoy, and it is sad to see it get such a huge set, only for it to fail so spectacularly. I could accept it if it was at a better price, 300 or less. Not for 550, plus 50 for its companion set.
    Torso is too tall and rendered wrong, way to boxy body, and way to much empty space not covered up. They could have bundled this with the buildable iron man, shrunk the main build down an inch or so to fix the proportion and give spare parts for the gaps. There is no reason they could have not truncated the frame a bit to let the detail hang off of it so we dont see the frame.
    Or the fact they refused to put a regular white LED in the light brick. I guess you can just use some technic lights, but they discontinued power functions and have no alternatives!
    This set really needed some more work and development, and I think it got rushed for christmas. The fact it has the gimmick shows it was in development atleast since buildable iron man was released. I would love to take it for 300, but its MSRP is absurd, and it being Lego store only just hinders it so much. Walmart had done a great job discounting other (Non-IP) Lego sets, and I think they could have actually made this sold if it was on their shelves. I dont see this as anything more than another huge set for Lego stores to display in their windows to drag people into stores.
    For this set, I would have expected limited poseability, with a focus on detail and shaping. It messes up proportions, has lots of gaps and hollow space, exposed frame elements. And literally no detail on the inside. With several features like light bricks badly integrated, as wrong of a color as you could get, and skimped detail on places that dont even do anything, like the ankles.
    Im sure someone can do a mod for this with its parts and make a much better build, but I would need to see that build and its instructions before considering buying this set at this price.
    When you ask who this set is for, probably me. I love Lego, and I love *_BIG_* Lego. Especially mechs. I want to build Lego mechs this scale, and it would be perfect if its flaws and price werent so off-putting. This is practically a mecha starter kit, begging to be redesigned or turned into something else, like Crimson Typhoon from Pacific Rim. I would love to see more of this from lego, just executed better.

  • @justintendo4302
    @justintendo4302 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It looks a lot better in person I will say after seeing at the Lego store, however I wish it’s proportions were better

  • @greenhill004
    @greenhill004 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like the set a lot more than most AFOLs, but really it's a $350 set AT BEST! NinjaGo Gardens has more pieces, a ton of figures and is now $350.

    • @undead.rising
      @undead.rising ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yup! $530 aud for Ninjago Gardens, but $850 for the Hulkbuster. Now which one am I going to buy?

  • @gumbycat5226
    @gumbycat5226 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It feels like a sloppy model to me, like that UCS transporter.

  • @Floorslug
    @Floorslug ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice! This was the review I was waiting for. I was initially convinced by everyone hating this set that it wasn’t worth the time, but after seeing it in person at the Lego store I actually really like it. I was super impressed by it’s size, and it absolutely dwarfs the Castle, which I think is a bit small for the price.

  • @IcEMystPrivate
    @IcEMystPrivate ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'd spend my money on the new Eifel Tower. This set has not the Lego spirit...

    • @Jehowy666
      @Jehowy666 ปีที่แล้ว

      Eifel Tower also has no Lego spirit.

  • @brickhunter7758
    @brickhunter7758 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Love your reviews!! It's a cool set, but way too unnecessary and expensive. :P

  • @CriticsCupofficial
    @CriticsCupofficial ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The best part is that the stand can hold the brick separater only thing that caught my eye which is NOT good for a £550 set jezz it looks ugly

  • @blop6817
    @blop6817 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I dont think it looks very good and for 550 dollars thats just not okay, lego says that only the best is good enough and this just plain isnt good enough 😡

  • @davidy3722
    @davidy3722 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent work as always. I mod would be a great video is you ever find the time

  • @moneywastedcollecting
    @moneywastedcollecting ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's cool in my opinion, but if I'm spending that much money, I'm saving a little more and getting the Hulk Vs Hulkbuster statue from sideshow collectibles.

  • @timewarpdrive77
    @timewarpdrive77 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If this had a deep discount (like down to 200 dollars), I might pick it up to moc it... with all that interior space, it could operate has a ship for minifigs

    • @sitsia3808
      @sitsia3808 ปีที่แล้ว

      let's hope for good discounts on black Friday that's in like 4 days left now? (2022 black Friday)

  • @h2owl205
    @h2owl205 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for not absolutely ripping this thing to shreds every waking second of the video. IMO this isn't a good set at all, but there are good parts to it and you highlighted them well. It just seems like all anyone does is beat the dead horse over and over

    • @HYBRIDZHQ
      @HYBRIDZHQ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah it's not my thing either but I'm kind of happy that Jang doesn't jump on the bandwagon

  • @empatheticrambo4890
    @empatheticrambo4890 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    18:45 seeing you be able to pick it up and wave it around really made me want to get it more than anything - what an incredible giant lego mech! But of course, I'll stick with playsets I can afford instead. But it was fun to see you swoosh it!

  • @michaelkolano8686
    @michaelkolano8686 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    you know, i actually wonder how worthwhile the skeleton or basis of this set is, to make other types of robot character models.
    like imagine a gundam, transformer, or battletech model based off this. i'd certainly get an ATLAS set for one!

  • @lucjan1897
    @lucjan1897 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Saw this guy in Lego shop recently. He's big, he doesn't look all that bad.. but even with all the details he doesn't looks perfect, he's way too expensive and he really has no reason to exist.

  • @smhcoolguy5024
    @smhcoolguy5024 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s crazy seeing the size against a hand

  • @Lego6980
    @Lego6980 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Jang,
    Have been watching you channel for years and thanks for all your great work, which has given me many hours of entertainment.
    Question - Have you thought of reviewing the u released Classic Space set 1526? Could be interesting?

  • @theeternal0114
    @theeternal0114 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We just need to wait for someone to rebuild it fully to look more movie accurate, fixing proportions, gaps etc (even if that mean no space for smaller figure inside), and post instructions on rebrickable. I think something like that could even help sell more of these sets (more as box with parts for 550 to build big Hulkbuster, just not the one from the box).

  • @gwkleong
    @gwkleong ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looking forward to Marvel Ultimate set that is minifigure scale hint hint Avenger Tower and Helicarrier

  • @ginxtrinx1393
    @ginxtrinx1393 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice!

  • @Zenlore6499
    @Zenlore6499 ปีที่แล้ว

    My goodness!

  • @morio9284
    @morio9284 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Insanely overpriced! 😱😱😱

  • @TenSoldierYT
    @TenSoldierYT ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You're into Gunpla Jang?
    Awesome, even more reason to stay, I've been here since 2010 and I've loved every second!

  • @amyjones25
    @amyjones25 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think the worst part about this set is that it looks like the chest and shoulders could have been done better but for some reason it wasn't. I also don't feel like the figure inside is the problem. The top just looks unfinished, like they had a specific piece count that they couldn't go over and had to make do with limited parts.

  • @DerHoschi
    @DerHoschi ปีที่แล้ว

    It's good for DC fans!

  • @devinyu2320
    @devinyu2320 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    $550 wow

  • @rogerhalt3991
    @rogerhalt3991 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks cool from afar but up close you start to notice some issues. Great model but I would buy if it’s reduced

  • @EvanMoon
    @EvanMoon ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I clicked LIKE

  • @oscarvilche4431
    @oscarvilche4431 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like to think of this set as A Hulkbuster set. Not THE Age of Ultron Hulkbuster. If I was not a super fan of Marvel movies, especially those in the Avengers chronology and theme, but i knew about Iron Man and, subsequently, the Hulkbuster, i would absolutely be impressed by this. It's a fantastic set and an awesome conversation starter especially in the world of MCU fans. But, it is inaccurate to the actual thing it's based on and the gaps are wrong, and for $550?? I would personally feel the need to put another $150+ to modify it and makes it screen accurate. It really is an awesome set and very impressive. Thank you Jang for reviewing it!!

  • @nathanaelhall5780
    @nathanaelhall5780 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I always appreciate your honesty & insight.

  • @maartnnn0507
    @maartnnn0507 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think one foot might make a pretty nice start for a star wars landspeeder...

  • @russ4550
    @russ4550 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The pauldron piece should've been made bigger (and shaped correctly..) to cover more of the gap, but remained hollow to keep the articulation to the arm piece could kind of slide inside it or at the furthest angle it could still be covering nearly to the first arm piece... Then making all of the legs thicker I think just these 2 changes would've made this model 100 percent better.. still not perfect but as it is now it just look like a little too many things were comprised or just wrong..

  • @KyL
    @KyL ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Appreciate Jang's positivity and optimism! Not a fan of the set at all but tatse is subjective.

  • @minervszombies
    @minervszombies ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's neat that it can hold the Iron Man action figure, but I don't think it was worth the awkward proportions and superfluous size.

  • @dougjohnson3737
    @dougjohnson3737 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do you think the best set to get for this VIP weekend that would get all the gwp?!

  • @carter5389
    @carter5389 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This set is really not doing it for me. The impressive size doesn't make up for gaps and inaccuracies in design. I think this set would've been better off much shorter, with the part count going toward a more movie accurate facade and more solid build.
    I think the gimmick is the main issue here, it necessitates the larger build with gaps and adds an extra $50 (in canada) on top of an already very expensive set. Losing this functionality and having an Iron Man helmet and torso built into the mech would've been a much better alternative.
    Call me captain hindsight I suppose, I just think this set leaves alot to be desired. I don't know if the compatibility with the action figure was a mandate from Lego or the designers idea, but either way this functionality seems to be the root of alot of the issues with this set in terms of the necessary scale and design compromises.
    Sorry for rambling, I just wanted to get my two cents out there. Great video as always Jang, you're easily my favourite Lego reviewer out there.

  • @TheGUNdalf
    @TheGUNdalf ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hope lego soon realises that they are in the end game with their completely off overprised sets 😎

  • @CrazyBunnyAids
    @CrazyBunnyAids ปีที่แล้ว

    Jang could you please fix this set on twitch in the future? It would be so cool and I would definitely buy it! It just needs some help to become a better set

  • @thebeetovenrider1246
    @thebeetovenrider1246 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Just bad design. Did they not do study groups? Or did they just not care?

  • @Hippienolic2
    @Hippienolic2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Consider myself an advanced builder and I prefer easier builds you’ll find in a small Harry Potter set than an 18+ set

  • @HoangPham-wp9gu
    @HoangPham-wp9gu ปีที่แล้ว +2

    after watching this, I am way happier that I bought the hot toys version. Even though it was almost twice the price of the LEGO one when I got it, it is like 4 times better. The LEGO one just has too many design flaws that bug me a lot.

  • @brainofmorbius
    @brainofmorbius ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for another well balanced review

  • @MichaelMartin-qe5ye
    @MichaelMartin-qe5ye ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's awesome that the build process is fun, but ultimately it's designed as display piece and it fails at that. 500 dollars for incorrect proportions, large gaps, and for the love of God, Lego, make gray or black technic pins instead of blue ones. If someone is paying 500+ dollars, they're probably an advanced builder and don't need blue pins, and even if they're not and they have to re-do a step, at least the look of the final product will be worth it.

  • @CEO_of_brug
    @CEO_of_brug ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This set is literally Ironman-ception

  • @undead.rising
    @undead.rising ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Over 4000 pieces? Sorry, but I just don't see it. And not having arm or leg printing on a figure in a premium set? That's very early 00's.

  • @lopoa126
    @lopoa126 ปีที่แล้ว

    Exposed blue technic on the ground for that price 😂

  • @WiF_Gaming
    @WiF_Gaming ปีที่แล้ว

    Like...it's a fine model, well made and sturdy!
    The Problem.. is that it is built "wrong" when they use Infinity Saga Hulkbuster as Reference, so much is off, and i don't see how that went through the "OKAY" Phase... and for 550 Dollars... i would expect it to be worth the money, and honestly, it doesn't feel worth at all...
    And i love Mechs hella much xdd