ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
These NEW SPACESHIPS Were Generated by AI
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 มี.ค. 2023
- A selection of great looking spaceships that would be fitting in any sci-fi world from Elite Dangerous to Star Wars. These were all created by the newly released Midjourney v5. But what does this mean for the future?
If you would like to help support my channel, please check my Patreon page: / obsidianant
PayPal Donation: www.paypal.com...
Any support is massively appreciated!
Music
Epidemic Sound
#aiart #midjourney
Eh, once you've seen maybe 50 to 100 images, they all start to look extremely similar.
Cause AI art cannot innovate, only remix the actual art (taken without consent from artists) it's been fed
It's still programmed by a human and will (SHOULD) always need to be initiated by a human. Once it starts making up it's own mind it should be shut down.
And that will only get worse as more and more artists poision their art from being used to make new ai "art".
@@Spidd124 my art/videos are about as far from AI as I can get it!
That has more to do with the people generating these images rather than the software.
I am dreading the near future where people will be able to use AI to generate thousands of hours of videos in short periods of time and flood TH-cam for ad revenue.
Some of your last batch on the previous vid on AI were stunning. Using Leonardo AI here- mostly for quick and cheap cover art for music releases for now, but will be using it for inspiration at some point. Even the weirder "uncanny valley" stuff is inspiring in a dreamlike kind of way.
Great video, the variation in sci fi is great. Makes your videos really interesting. Never know what your going to show us next, Thanks!
Maybe Chris Roberts should ask AI to finish his game.
AI: "Does not compute."
AI: Ask for something more realistic, like unicorns..
Won't be surprised if it's unironically already happening to some extent, as a game developer I use these tools a lot
The problem with this is the AI has no concept of function or practicality. It just mashes up images. The ships have no rhyme or reason to their forms. Definitely not a fan of the AI art from the perspective of realistic application of concepts. But for ideation or inspiration purposes, I've got no issues with it.
This comment makes little sense. Ships are actually very uncreative beasts in ed and sc. Cigars, lozenges or tic tacs are what many say they see when taking about UFOs. If you are talking about ships that are contained by physical/material limits they remain dull. Some quirkiness is appreciated.
0:02 is awesome, understated but awesome
👍
Awesome indeed !
I want that Space-Ship ! ! !
they're just a mashup of already existing ship designs
Organic intelligence can generate something from nothing, artificial intelligence can't
Kind of, but not really.
I disagree, AI seems to have a massive problem with star ships, yes there is a big improvement, but still the design of the spaceships look like nothing Elite Dangerous and Star Citizent, the designs are very basic, generic and unoriginal. I am sure sooner or later AI will nail it but after personally fiddling , as a 3d artist, the AI suffers from a lot of unoriginality , possible because the art that was fed was not that oiriginal to begin and second because the AI process tries to the create an average of its inputs compared to a 3d or 2d artist that will be much more biased and specialised in a specific style. Some of the most amazing images of AI online are made after a ton of error. In my case the acceptable output for my taste is no more than 1% of the images AI generates for me and I have been tinkering with everything, models, prompts etc. But again AI will only get better from here so I am sure its a matter of time till more specialised models are build and we are given more freedom to customise AI output. Side note inpainting is a great way to force AI to come up with a cool oiriginal design, you paint a very basic image for the general shape of the starship and then it uses that as input. Its what produced form me the best startships and other subjects when I am not getting the results |I want.
Do you think that people should aquire a separate licence to look at and study publically released art to improve their own art skills? I think that's stupid. And that is exactly what those AI models are doing.
Won't have to pay 70$ for shitty disappointments anymore soon, I'll be able to have an AI generate the perfect game. Really excited about the future.
I used an AI art program to create an album cover for my bands last release. I'm not a graphic artist but the program created a cover a number people found interesting to look at and commented on. AI art is here to stay, and most definitely has a place in the creative process for bands and obviously other art forms
Great Video ObsidianAnt! I love creating Spaceships with Midjourney! Very interesting to see what it makes! I like doing interiors, that could possibly be used for Star Citizen 😂 The Devs can definitely take inspiration with these AI images. I personally like making Cross Section images with midjourney❤🎉😅
The newer development of AI, can potentially destroy the remaining real existent journalism. May we are already in the complete Matrix.
Oh man I would love to listen your podcast all day. U have amazing voice
Humans will still make art, regardless of AI advances. Some of the pieces look stunning, and I can see companies using AI to generate concept art, after all it is cheaper and faster than hiring an artist. After the initial craze is over, things will be more stable and I think we will see artists working together with AI to create stunning art. Even if an AI cannot use imagination like a human can, there is enough art on the internet for it to "get inspiration from".
What I am more worried about is AI`s like ChatGPT being created without hardcoded limits put in, used to created anything from viruses/malware to chemical weapons and biological agents. I remember the creator of Chat saying that in the first testing period some people asked it to create spyware and asked how to make bombs using household items. Some other uses include emulating someone`s voice based on a short soundbyte, faking videos and so on. Its scary.
Eventually there will come a point when you will request a completely functional, AI generated open world game. Just type in a script and you're done.
while the existence of this technology can receive praise I dont think or want AI generating art
What does it mean for the future? That AI can't design spaceships.
What prompt did you use to get Elite Dangerous style ship? I tried it, bnut the results I get with v5 are far inferior to what you got.
What we need is AI creating in game content. Imagine Landscapes in Starfield created per player procedurally by an AI. Imagine exploring environments unique to your personal game. Imagine dynamic missions including dialogues created by AI uniquely for you. Infinite content. That is what I am hoping for, if I live long enough, that is...
A real problem it has is doing anything with cars
Amazing! ❤
I'd love to know the name of the song playing in the background
This basicly makes artists keyboard wackers, ai generated art needs an own watermark.
Hands are still a common problem...
How about like upgrading a ship or weapon. Adding on armour, engines, or shield layers? Battle repairs, warp core refurbishing, etc... See if it knows what a Jefferies tube is? Should be some interesting games in the future, to say the least.
Looooove this. Thank you for sharing 😍😁
AI creates nothing, it's just evolution of copy/paste job with huge details. AI can't ask to "itself".
Why cant google make this a free search feature along with ai chat to make google searches alot better?
They already have, it's called Bard, and it's currently in beta.
Incredible thanks
I came here to see AI generated spaceships, not get lectured to about AI copyright ethics. All the positive comments must be from AI or people who appreciate click bait. Skip the entire first half to get to the content promised in the title 3:08
ive found some twitter accounts making AI models. some of them is FREIGHTFULLY hard to see if they real or fake at times.
according to some convasations i have had, they think AI genereated pictures and art is taking over from 2025. i can honestly fear abit for that
It depends on how things unfold over the next few years. A lot of people understandably don't like it, and I don't blame them. I suspect in one form or another though, it's here to stay.
@@ObsidianAnt so do i. theres allready talk of multible professions getting into problems over time. allthough i dont think it will go that far, it will be a challange to control and adept to it.
@@michaelsndergaard2912 Yesterday there were a ton of AI Image Generation announcements.
Adobe released Firefly into beta. This will be a part of their creative suite.
Nvidia and Getty Images announced a tool that will be a part of Nvidia Foundations.
Microsoft released Bing Create into testing, placing image generation directly into Bing Search.
The box has been opened, and there's no putting this back in.
@@ObsidianAnt a person ive met, gave me acces to a beta of an independent AI system. playing around with that now.
its getting big
Skip to 3:08
it is kinda scary, I have to admit
Ant you know run diffusion is more personal and customizable
AI art is such an interesting topic. If we boil it down its literally just a reflection of us and it cant exist outside of the human perspective. If anything it demonstrates that the ability to perceive art as art is not solely about it requiring an intent behind an artist.
The controversies surrounding art are either the feeling of one's identify going through infringement or how it will impact art as a commodity--which is an entirely separate problem that is innate within our mis-understanding of actual value and our ability to arbitrarily assign value to things that will always be arbitrary.
I don't get this issues with the copyrighted images which was used for AI training. It's like, if I learned how to paint based on "copyrighted" pictures, so what? I should be canceled? Despite that I'm from Russia and already being canceled, but you never know where from another surprise can come (just a funny note). Same for any other creativity process, where everyone learning how to do the stuff by copying and "improving" popular works from other authors. After all, for me this concerns about (c) looks like silly attempt to slow down an AI progression.
diference is people pay for stuf they use to improve their skills
@@fistsofsnake5475 I don't get your example. People might be paying to teachers, but they also can learn various methods (creativity approaches) by themselves by just copying many times someone's work and improving skills by this. It's not like someone will be actually banned if he use same as someone methods. We can clearly see this in music, painting, engineering etc. So what's the difference if AI learned methods by looking at other works (same as human do)? AI just can learn and reproduce quicker than human and after that any human can reproduce someone's method without spending months and years to learn it. But this is how progress works...
@@turbovatnik8973 yesa, but to copy somones work they have to see it. Like buy ticket to museumor buy book. Pay for it. It's as simple as it's goes
@@fistsofsnake5475 but you can watch same paintings in internet. I mean, I get what you mean, but for learning purpose you don't really need to pay for the ticket or book. You can just ask google to find specific image in biggest possible resolution, find description of technique, etc. Yes, google have option to find copyright free images, but nobody ask you to pay if you want to watch someone's work to reproduce it and learn technique.
@@turbovatnik8973 and here we come to bigest thing. Based on materials you learn how to create similiar thing- if it's to similiar it's plagiat. You can paint Mona Lisa with blond hairs but its still not gonna be orginal or your own. AI just take pieces of art slap together and call it new. And as you mention AI can do it a lot quicker so it can do 1000 of mixes and just show you 5 best
In some cases, I think V3 looks better.
its really cool to see the progress.
I'm not really impressed with the design style of those spaceships. They so overly detailed and looked like something designed by the Ford company.
The whole idea of AI making art, writing stories, doing it's own research, and doing voice acting creeps me out and turns me away. I don't even know if this is you speaking. Not into this stuff.
I'm sure Disney is looking at replacing their armies of animators with ai. The genie is out of the bottle.
Common man, don't endorse this AI crap. It's an insult to all the artists who made the space games we enjoy possible.
Just make the program digitally sign the images it creates.
lol - you can easily remove that XD you do realize that you can make an screenshot or copy and paste image as a layer in photoshop, flatten visible layer and just save it anyway?
@@HCforLife1 micro print and then ya get to play pokemon and hope you find all of the hidden micro print.
@@HCforLife1 you can't easily remove that, for example, the signature process may modify a small subset of pixels so that the sum of their r, g, b values would be prime. The signature is de facto invisible and can be easily verified.
BIR
unfortunately AI 'art' is made by stealing others hard work, without their consent
Exactly, you even see Getty Images text in some of this AI art, the court cases will set the tone for the next years.
💯
I don't think it's moral to create content made by AI. AI art should stop. People are still working their asses off while AI is created to make art. Should be the other way around. This should not be developed further and the earlier we stop giving attention the better it is for the future. We are living in a hell world, I'm so tired.
Unfortunately - everybody thought that AI will free people from hard, difficult healt-destroying slave jobs. This going the other way around - the first jobs AI will destroy (not sure when but this will happen) - will be the jobs requiring high creativity (art, design and so on), intelligence (some statistics, analisis, development and so on), and problem-solving skills. The people who have assets now (properties, wealth, connections) - they will be on the top of food chain. This might actually lead to a downfall of humanity.
Go to sleep and stay in the stoneage then
@@Saucebrunette human creativity is not just some problem that needs fixing
I would say the immoral part is the art used without consent to make these programs, not just the AI inherently. It's just a tool
There's 100% ethical issues around this, as I discussed in the video. I also 100% agree with the ethical concerns. But the tech is also the future.
Adobe just announced Firefly, which is just like Midjourney. It will be integrated into the Adobe suite of tools, and has been trained on Adobe stock.
Nvidia and Getty Images are working together on image generation tool that will be a part of Nvidia Foundations. This tool has been trained on Getty stock.
Microsoft just released Bing Create, which puts image creation directly into Bing Search.
I understand why you feel people should stop giving this attention, but that wont' change anything. The can has now been opened, and it's not going to be closed. Stopping talking about it, is just burying our heads in the sand.
Can you share some of the midjourney keywords?
ZN
Really dissapointing to get this in my sub box. AI creates nothing, especially nothing new. The biggest issue with AI isn't "hands", it's theft.
Yeah, not too interested in this type of content. This is basically non-content. All you have done is used a free or paid to use for a month an AI art generator, put in the right words and sifted through to find some of the designs that looked passable. It's not very interesting when no one has thought about the designs and creations.
I agree that just saying it's a cool picture isn't engaging.
But if content creators use the art to make their own world building, like those alts 60s and 70s sci-fi coffee table art books, that would be pretty cool.
@@AudioCalibrator yesterday Adobe announced Firefly. An AI art generation tool that will be built into their productivity suite. This tool has been trained on Adobe stock.
Nvidia and Getty Images have announced a partnership. They will be making a tool for generative image AI. This is trained on Getty Images stock.
Microsoft also opened Bing Create. An image generation tool that is built into Bing search.
Shutterstock already have an Text-to-Image AI tool.
You might not like the tools, and I agree that some of the tools have been trained in a very bad way. I also agree there are a ton of ethical concerns. It's also pretty sad for some aspects of human creativity. People are right to be frustrated about these things. However the technology isn't going anywhere, and it is 100% the future. The technology is fully supported by the biggest art and photography names in the industry, such as Adobe, Getty and Shutterstock. That being the case, I will continue to talk about this from time to time.
@@Mazder_Verhal This video took around 8 hours to produce. Fair enough if you feel it was low effort or not worthwhile. But it still took way longer than many of my other videos. Meanwhile, many of my highest viewed videos take way less time to produce.
@@ObsidianAnt Time, yes. Effort, no.
I'd much prefer if you'd've been able to get a bunch of concept artists to do it, rather than plugging in some keywords into an AI and just revelling in the images that took far less effort.
Plus I doubt that fDev signed off on their art style being emulated via this AI that most likely scoured google images for it's training at one of its previous versions (if not this one).
AI generation is ethically bankrupt unless consent is given, and most of the time the consent is not expressly given until it's far too late.
@@ObsidianAnt I see what you are arguing but the main gripe I had with your video was not just the idea of using AI to create art in general, it was the fact that you were using an AI that is already known for being trained on stolen artwork from actual people and making a I would assume monetised video off of it (because I got an ad before I watched it), Which while you do have a degree of separation is still taking advantage of someone else's stolen art.
On the topic of major organisations and companies making AI to produce art or to enhance their products I would imagine due to the legal issues they have not trained their AI software on stolen content unlike for example DALL-E 2 or Midjourney. Thus making their AI software at least somewhat ethical.
AI art sucks. All it does is steal art from humans and mash it together into soulless crap.
The better the AI becomes the more and more people are just going to abandon actual hard work and learning how to make stuff for themselves, creativity will stagnate.
Also Midjourney, IIRC, was trained on billions of images. I doubt consent was gotten on every single on of those, ergo it is technically theft as it doesn't fall under fair use as it legally stands. And the problem is a load of AI as they are need training and even open source ones are not exempt form this practice of theft of hard work done by photographers, artists, writers and even coders.
And even IF they claim their AI were trained "ethically" I severely doubt they actually were. Companies lie all the time and I am pretty certain the ethical capabilities of sourcing images to train an AI are going to be hand wavey claims of "yeah we tooootally restricted ourselves to open source and licences".
And it's not like image hosting sites aren't making AI-opt-in options hidden on their sites or anything. Nope, totally not. No Deviantart-like situations happening ever.
As a kind of ex-artist who is trying to desperately get back into making stuff again the AI cheating methods are honestly disgusting in the concept of just plugging in a prompt and getting "close enough" or "pretty".
Meh.
This really is amazing. Thank you for sharing 🪐
I'll never understand why these techbros hold such contempt for artists.
Its like they look at human creativity as a problem that needs fixing
Because human art is inherently biased and ethically wrong. AI anything is the fairest and most just we will ever have. AI should make all decisions and humans should learn to get out of the way and realize they are not important, they never were important, and to believe anything else simply means that you are a narcissist.
@@joshua-ov4ne lol nice meme
Edit: or if you're serious, then wow, I feel very sad / sorry for you and that terrible world view