@@SimonBenjamin Yes. Actor Paul Bettany, who plays the voice of JARVIS or Vision, has a British accent and was born in Great Britain. I think a user interface of this complex type like JARVIS is a matter of the near future. :). I wish you good luck in your further work, Professor. I've always enjoyed your lessons: D
@@rudra8705 Hmm well I'm not sure how much information we have on it from the film. Do we know much beyond the fact that it is a compact thing with a ring like structure and wires wrapped like a "toroidal solenoid"? Difficult to tell what the physics could be just from that, although we can put limits on in like I did in this video.
I loved your take on Ironman. I really admire how he was a science based hero. I did a video reaction to the aerospace elements of this film. But I'm really glad to covered the arc reactor. That's definitely something I didn't want to get into. I'm more of an aero guy.
I have a two-year physics degree myself, and this is awesome. Iron Man is my favorite superhero. My favorite fictional character of all time is Doctor Doom.
Yeah iron man inspires us to think what we can do without superpowers! I don’t know so much about doc doom but he seems to have an interesting story as a leader
@@SimonBenjamin Except the Tony Stark's brilliant mind is a sort of superpower that along with his wealth allows him to create the powers of flight, super strength, durability, and various projectile and energy weapons that let him strike at a distance.
i guess Im randomly asking but does anybody know of a way to log back into an Instagram account..? I was stupid forgot the account password. I love any assistance you can offer me.
18:06 Distributed thrusters is actually a thing that Tony adds in his Mk-2 suit once he comes back home (probably because of the massive injury he faced after the crash landing of the crude Mk-1 suit). If you nitpick through the first montage of him training to use his new suit, you will see the initial pre-flight caliberation sequence that Jarvis runs during the suit up. Everytime Tony enters his flight mode or uses his palm thrusters for offensive blasts, the distributed thrusters in this back also light up and fire off for counterbalance. These tiny thrusters, accompanied by tiny moveable winglets, from my observation are present near his abdomen, higher back, middle back, thighs and leg calves which help him in his flight balance and save him from momentum impacts.
Just to clarify one thing. When Tony explained his reactor’s power it was the first one and in the movie he upgrades it and the bad guy stole the upgraded one and he had to use the old one that he made in the cave and the A.I said that one is not designed to fly. Also the tank hitting Tony it doesn’t show it was direct most likely it just grazed him and sent him off balance. Thanks for the math you doing amazing video by the way I love it.
Yep true we don’t know whether the tank shell was direct or glancing. However if you watch the scene the impact does dramatically change the way Tony is moving, so there is a big change in momentum, and his body would have to pay the price for that. And yep the power reactor gets better over the movie (and over following movies) I guess I’m saying that even the first one has plenty of power to make the things we see possible (from and energy point of view at least).
@@SimonBenjamin I would love a updated video on the suit. Since the tech he's using in the suit can be something like graphene or carbon nano tubes or artificial muscles that is either dampening the force that the armor pieces on he's suit experiences and counter reacts that down to the level that makes it equal to the damage he took as seen when he's home and out of the suit. And the suit has a pressurized internal area for him and he's body too. And the shell he got hit by can also just be a AA shell/shrapnel shell or a HE shell, since it's Shooting at a flying target witch would mean any sabo or anti armor rounds would be most likely not used for something like that at those ranges (1-2km by a estimation of the distance shown in the movie) and since he lands or crashes some hundred meters away from the tank it's self maybe as much as 500m but more likely around 100-200m out. The arc reactor on the other hand can be a more advanced version of the prototype large plasma/fusion reactors we are currently testing and building here in europe. And last but not least....he's weight....200kg is not that much for something that advanced....so i'd increase it to at least 400kg maybe even 500kg. Love the break down and how you have done the video.
Well, these kind of videos should definitely get more attention. From people with your educational level and your professional approach, it's just so good to watch. Plus, viewers learn something. The expression when you talk about Hulk is phenomenal. Nice!
I actually really enjoyed this video, I love how you’re diving in to the physics and explaining the science behind the power that would be needed. The arc reactor, I think of it as a cold fusion, which of course is something that hasn’t been successfully achieved yet (to my knowledge) and then if we did get it started, how stable would it be. Great video
This is the first video I'm watching in your channel, and this video really excites me since I'm looking forward to taking physics class next year in high school! Thank you for making this video so interesting and helpful.
Love the explanation of conservation of momentum. I’ve seen other films overlook this fact as well. Bulletproof, even missile proof, doesn’t mean momentum proof!
Momentum conservation makes a perfect case for the infeasibility of such a suit today, at least one that can carry a human inside of it. Generating an artificial gravity field, one whose intensity and direction can be instantly controlled at will, might solve the problem, but this is definitely a project for the far future :) Thank you for the nice analysis!
@@manu144x I think the suit is still useful in that case actually. It would be much more clunky, and in a combat scenario, disadvantageous to you if the environment was modified to create that artificial gravity. Not to mention much more expensive. Whereas the suit as a localised environment will always have an actively modified gravity for the user only.
@@dunkeykung1162 If you can manipulate gravity just make a gravity field around you and any object thrown at you would just stop and ‘fall’ back. Or go around you. Also, any object can be weaponized. Maybe you’d need the suit so you have weapons onboard and look cool but beyond that not much :)
I know this is four years old but seriously….I wish I had a teacher like you to help explain me abstract concepts like this. My problem was always visualizing it and that prohibited my relation and in turn my learning. If you I could have had someone like you teach me using comic books and movies….I have been such a better student. Good job dude and thank you for doing this. Also to kind of bring a bit of nerdiness into this: the movie does depict several additional thruster through out the suit for flight stabilization. If you review the scenes when he is developing flight in the suit you can see these several tiny thrusters in the exposed boot as he successfully lifts off. I do not know if they are enough thrusters or anything like that for what you said. But i believe we are left to assume there are several flight stabilizing thruster through out the suit. One could assume that power could be routed to those thrusters in a big way via automation in the form of the algorithms in the Jarvis AI. I dunno if I am on the right track or reaching. I am but a simple aircraft mechanic here lol but I would love to get your feedback….even though I am four years late to watching your video. Thank you again so much
I’m sure it’s been mentioned but we actually see most of Tony’s suits have additional thrusters in the shoulder blade and calf areas. The portrayal of these features varies between movies but it is in fact there. Also I would imagine as the genius defense contractor & weapons designer he is, he would make sure Jarvis is constantly on alert for nearly imperceptible threats to auto engage before Tony could even react or simply without His input. I mean we now have pretty decently self driving cars, albeit with room for improvement, they can parallel park, tell if somethings in their path, stop or attempt to avoid collisions, and maneuver down a highway pretty easily… so it’s probably safe to say tony incorporated micro thrusters akin to those on satellites or large sea vessels to maintain stability or do fine course corrections. Regardless great insights here, I’ve seen this vid a couple times over the years and it’s always a joy!! Thanks dude!
12:10 It depends on what kind of projectile hits him and if it's hit as you have assumed wich is basicly worst case scenario or if it's glancing hit (bounce) wich can be anywhere from deadly to survivable. From the short clip shown in movie my best guess for shell type is some kind of HEAT shell wich uses explosives in the shell to get trough armor.
This was a very nice video on exploring the physics of Ironman. & while I was not upset by the "nitpick" [which was fair to point out] I still really appreciate your concern. Its good to keep the optimism going, & it still ticked a lot of boxes as to how plausible such a suit would exist in real life & that's what I loved most of all.
10:24 I would like to point out that that number is the total energy consumed over the distance. And that’s a fraction of what the reactor produces in a second. So basically, with these assumptions, the suit could fly 10km in under a second (starting with 0m/s)
The point of the arc reactor is that it is self-replicating, and once you get it going, it doesn't stop. Like cold fusion is supposed to be. Man, cold fusion, that takes me back. Val Kilmer's movie the Saint was about that, too.
Just discovered this channel from the ycombinator interview. I love it. The new bleeding edge iron man armor from infinity war might allow for some sci-if momentum dampening effects though. Going on a tangent here, but could you do a video on how the postulates for schrodingers wave equation came into being, like the wave function has to be continuous especially at the boundary of a finite potential, etc ... and also how did max born choose to interpret schrodingers wave eqn as a probability distribution by taking the magnitude of the complex wave function? How did max born even thought of the wave eqn this way ? Thanks 🤘🏿
Thanks for the comment -- yeah Tony's tech got pretty close to star trek over the Inifinity War and Endgame movies. Interesting idea for a video on the origin of quantum theory. I'll have to think about it -- but I'd also have to do some research since I don't actually know the full story of the early history of the field.
Thanks for mentioning the acceleration, I kept thinking when watching that he would have turned into mush so many times. In the Three Body Problem series of sci-fi novels (highly recommend, but spoilers ahead FYI to anyone reading this), this exact pasting actually happens to the entire crew of a couple ships, whose captains override safety systems and activate 120g acceleration despite none of the crew being immersed in (and breathing diffused oxygen from) inert fluid which would otherwise have been required for them to survive. Quite a way to kick the bucket for sure.
My understanding of the momentum issue was that the forces are distributed uniformly through his body by diamagnetic repulsion, similar to the levitating frog demo, but scaled up.
The math you were doing for the 3MJ/second would be for the FIRST ARC reactor. As you remember, when Tony has to use the old reactor at the end of the movie, Jarvis said the reactor wasn't set for continuous flight. So the new ARC reactor was producing MORE power than the first one.
BRILLIANTT, THANK YOU FOR MAKING THIS VIDEO PROFESSOR. I am a high school student from Indonesia and im really interested in physics. I wanna ask professor, is it possible to make a flying tech, imagine its like a long shoes that at the calves part i make a slim hole that fits aerodinamicly with my legs and works like a vacuum cleaner, sucking air in big mass and push the sucked air from my foot to act as a booster so that i can fly, and also make the same tech in my arms to control the direction when im flying. I cant stop thinking about this theory lately but i need a professional to guide me, i hope i will be as smart as you and you responded to this thoughts, thank you professor.
Hi, thanks for the comment. Well what you are describing is similar to the way regular jets work (which heat up air to make it expand and push it out the back) or drone engines (which are just fans to push the air) so it would definitely be possible according to physics! The challenge is to have a light and powerful source of energy to make it all work. The recent progress in drones is partly because of better batteries, but you'd need something even better to lift a human and keep them flying for a reasonable time.
what about heat distribution this is a big thing if it made thrust that can lift you in that kind of space there isn't a metal that can last very long without melting and fusing with your hands and feat
As far as I know, it’s a made up thing at any scale. But it definitely sounds like a real thing so good job to the writers! I suppose in the movie it was a real thing before Tony got captured and then he miniaturised it - but in real life it isn’t a thing at all. Maybe you need to invent it :)
I think what addresses the momentum problem was the metal used in his recent armors. It is a fictional element Vibranium wich can absorb huge amount of energy. Of course I'm still doubting on how Tony handled that momentum problem before he started using Vibranium.
This is a really interesting video, loved it! I also recently thought about how in the opening scene of iron Man 2, he's doing a superhero landing going from what seems to be very high speeds to a complete stop in an extremely short time. So I was wondering how he could stay completely safe and sound after such a extreme impact and acceleration, and also how he didn't just fell through the platform helanded on 😂
As long as the suit is moving at the exact same speed as Tony than it’s ok. Same thing as when your driving a car. As long as you are going the same speed as the car than your ok. It’s when you keep moving vs the suit or the car your in that you die or get hurt. Hope that made sense
Don't know if you will see this but I watched an engineer critique Tony's suit and remarks on the detail they put in place where they show mini-thrusters through our the suit it you couple that with an advanced AI it would be able to counter the event without his input. Main issue would be what his suit is made of, this is where they take a scifi side step with vibranium
For the shell example, you are assuming that he stops the shell, but, you can see in the video, that it makes him "spin" and therefore the motion deflects some of the impact?
I seen the references to heat vs power generated arguments and the thing I find missing is is the reference to the material used. Palladium is not radioactive in any way. It is more of a Platinum metal by atomic charts. In order for it to produce the required amounts of power it would require it to be a metal of the uranium family of metals. There by producing lethal amounts of radiation.
Moscovium plates distributed over the surface of his suit. Perfect fix. Moscovium(element 115) is postulated to generate gravity. The plate configuration could be such to generate a gravity well around his body enabling it to withstand or nullify inertial forces. Of course, he would've discovered the means to stabilize that ephemeral element.
Your voice is like Jarvis.
Well Paul Bettany and I are both brits. I don’t know if Jarvis in the comics is supposed to have a brit accent?
@@SimonBenjamin he is British in the comics professor
Jarvis is iron mans dads assistant (fun fact from endgame)
@@SimonBenjamin Yes. Actor Paul Bettany, who plays the voice of JARVIS or Vision, has a British accent and was born in Great Britain. I think a user interface of this complex type like JARVIS is a matter of the near future. :). I wish you good luck in your further work, Professor. I've always enjoyed your lessons: D
Jarvis is howard stark's butler
5 Years Later: AI part is the easiest
yeaah thats what I thought😂😂
If you'd me to make a "Physics of the Hulk" video then Like this comment!
Simon Benjamin 👍🏾
👍🏾
👍🏾
not a bad idea but physics of arc reactor would be much appreciated...many fans would love that ...hope to see that video soon
@@rudra8705 Hmm well I'm not sure how much information we have on it from the film. Do we know much beyond the fact that it is a compact thing with a ring like structure and wires wrapped like a "toroidal solenoid"? Difficult to tell what the physics could be just from that, although we can put limits on in like I did in this video.
I loved your take on Ironman. I really admire how he was a science based hero. I did a video reaction to the aerospace elements of this film. But I'm really glad to covered the arc reactor. That's definitely something I didn't want to get into. I'm more of an aero guy.
Yeah I watched that nice video
I just watched your video!
Your video recomended me this video.
He slipped up and said designed 😊
This video came up after yours
I have a two-year physics degree myself, and this is awesome. Iron Man is my favorite superhero. My favorite fictional character of all time is Doctor Doom.
Yeah iron man inspires us to think what we can do without superpowers! I don’t know so much about doc doom but he seems to have an interesting story as a leader
@@SimonBenjamin Except the Tony Stark's brilliant mind is a sort of superpower that along with his wealth allows him to create the powers of flight, super strength, durability, and various projectile and energy weapons that let him strike at a distance.
I only studied physics in school, but this only requires fundamental knowledge of newtonian mechanics, which most of us in India learn in grade 11.
@@PankajDoharey I got you this 🏆
Same characters really. But doom uses magic too. In truth, technology and magic are one and the same.
This awesome educational video from an Oxford professor only have less than 500 views? This is ridiculous. GJ tho.
Was fun to make so it's all good. Glad you enjoyed.
The majority of people aren’t smart so this is expected.
i guess Im randomly asking but does anybody know of a way to log back into an Instagram account..?
I was stupid forgot the account password. I love any assistance you can offer me.
@Axel Amir Instablaster =)
40K Views
Tony stark: You can't understand my Math
Meanwhile Prof. Benjamin: hold my beer
18:06 Distributed thrusters is actually a thing that Tony adds in his Mk-2 suit once he comes back home (probably because of the massive injury he faced after the crash landing of the crude Mk-1 suit). If you nitpick through the first montage of him training to use his new suit, you will see the initial pre-flight caliberation sequence that Jarvis runs during the suit up. Everytime Tony enters his flight mode or uses his palm thrusters for offensive blasts, the distributed thrusters in this back also light up and fire off for counterbalance. These tiny thrusters, accompanied by tiny moveable winglets, from my observation are present near his abdomen, higher back, middle back, thighs and leg calves which help him in his flight balance and save him from momentum impacts.
Just to clarify one thing. When Tony explained his reactor’s power it was the first one and in the movie he upgrades it and the bad guy stole the upgraded one and he had to use the old one that he made in the cave and the A.I said that one is not designed to fly.
Also the tank hitting Tony it doesn’t show it was direct most likely it just grazed him and sent him off balance.
Thanks for the math you doing amazing video by the way I love it.
Yep true we don’t know whether the tank shell was direct or glancing. However if you watch the scene the impact does dramatically change the way Tony is moving, so there is a big change in momentum, and his body would have to pay the price for that.
And yep the power reactor gets better over the movie (and over following movies) I guess I’m saying that even the first one has plenty of power to make the things we see possible (from and energy point of view at least).
Simon Benjamin thank you for explaining everything man appreciate that.
@@SimonBenjamin You are dangerously right!
didnt expect luffy to say something so smart
@@SimonBenjamin I would love a updated video on the suit.
Since the tech he's using in the suit can be something like graphene or carbon nano tubes or artificial muscles that is either dampening the force that the armor pieces on he's suit experiences and counter reacts that down to the level that makes it equal to the damage he took as seen when he's home and out of the suit.
And the suit has a pressurized internal area for him and he's body too.
And the shell he got hit by can also just be a AA shell/shrapnel shell or a HE shell, since it's Shooting at a flying target witch would mean any sabo or anti armor rounds would be most likely not used for something like that at those ranges (1-2km by a estimation of the distance shown in the movie) and since he lands or crashes some hundred meters away from the tank it's self maybe as much as 500m but more likely around 100-200m out.
The arc reactor on the other hand can be a more advanced version of the prototype large plasma/fusion reactors we are currently testing and building here in europe.
And last but not least....he's weight....200kg is not that much for something that advanced....so i'd increase it to at least 400kg maybe even 500kg.
Love the break down and how you have done the video.
Well, these kind of videos should definitely get more attention. From people with your educational level and your professional approach, it's just so good to watch. Plus, viewers learn something. The expression when you talk about Hulk is phenomenal. Nice!
I actually really enjoyed this video, I love how you’re diving in to the physics and explaining the science behind the power that would be needed. The arc reactor, I think of it as a cold fusion, which of course is something that hasn’t been successfully achieved yet (to my knowledge) and then if we did get it started, how stable would it be. Great video
Love this video so much! I inspire to be an engineer and physicist one day, so the more the knowledge I learn the better! keep up the content!
This is the first video I'm watching in your channel, and this video really excites me since I'm looking forward to taking physics class next year in high school! Thank you for making this video so interesting and helpful.
Love the explanation of conservation of momentum. I’ve seen other films overlook this fact as well. Bulletproof, even missile proof, doesn’t mean momentum proof!
Awesome video sir, This channel is so underrated, your content is awesome, thank you professor
Tony somehow tanking all the g-forces he’s subjected too throughout the mcu is the hard pill to swallow for me.
Hello
This video was a 3 in 1
science
english (i'm french)
and superhero story
I've learned so much in 1 video... Thanks alot !
Glad you enjoyed it Milo!
New note: adding pillows to the suit
Love the description of forces as being communicated too
This video is gonna blow up, keep up the good work!
I like that you took the very optimistic and enthusiastic approach to the physics of Iron man.
You are a hero and you cleared off my all the doubts about Tony's suit
And Thank you for this wonderful video.
And plz keep making videos like this.
Fantastic explanation
Great analysis
Momentum conservation makes a perfect case for the infeasibility of such a suit today, at least one that can carry a human inside of it. Generating an artificial gravity field, one whose intensity and direction can be instantly controlled at will, might solve the problem, but this is definitely a project for the far future :)
Thank you for the nice analysis!
The irony is that If you have the capability to manipulate gravity, you don't need such a suit, it would be useless.
@@manu144x I think the suit is still useful in that case actually. It would be much more clunky, and in a combat scenario, disadvantageous to you if the environment was modified to create that artificial gravity. Not to mention much more expensive. Whereas the suit as a localised environment will always have an actively modified gravity for the user only.
Joe Rogan joined the chat
Wouldn't reactive armor from a Modern tank - if it covered his suit - negate much of the momentum of the incoming penetrating shell?
@@dunkeykung1162 If you can manipulate gravity just make a gravity field around you and any object thrown at you would just stop and ‘fall’ back. Or go around you. Also, any object can be weaponized.
Maybe you’d need the suit so you have weapons onboard and look cool but beyond that not much :)
really like your approach to analyzing the physics.
GREAT VIDEO ! I always thought about the momentum thing , finally satisfied with your mathematics too.! thanks !!!
I know this is four years old but seriously….I wish I had a teacher like you to help explain me abstract concepts like this. My problem was always visualizing it and that prohibited my relation and in turn my learning. If you I could have had someone like you teach me using comic books and movies….I have been such a better student. Good job dude and thank you for doing this.
Also to kind of bring a bit of nerdiness into this: the movie does depict several additional thruster through out the suit for flight stabilization. If you review the scenes when he is developing flight in the suit you can see these several tiny thrusters in the exposed boot as he successfully lifts off. I do not know if they are enough thrusters or anything like that for what you said. But i believe we are left to assume there are several flight stabilizing thruster through out the suit. One could assume that power could be routed to those thrusters in a big way via automation in the form of the algorithms in the Jarvis AI. I dunno if I am on the right track or reaching. I am but a simple aircraft mechanic here lol but I would love to get your feedback….even though I am four years late to watching your video.
Thank you again so much
love every bit of this! fantastic
this is better than most 10-50k subbed channels you desrve more views and subs this was great! you got a like from me
I loved how you explained everything
He somewhat solved the momentum issue on his MK-42. You are great in your work.
Really enjoyed your explanation of the types of forces on the suit. Ive always questioned that to myself.....lol. but job well done.
You should talk more about those kind of super hero science stuff, I Just can't get enough of It!
Amazing explanation sir.
This is a very excellent video ! How he explains his ideas and uses facts to back it up.
Excellent explanation ❤️
dude, you sound so excited about it. you must be an awsome teacher.
What beautiful explanation!
What a great explanation. Good job professor.👍🏻
thank you for making a video about almost every IM physics argument I've had since 2008
I’m sure it’s been mentioned but we actually see most of Tony’s suits have additional thrusters in the shoulder blade and calf areas. The portrayal of these features varies between movies but it is in fact there. Also I would imagine as the genius defense contractor & weapons designer he is, he would make sure Jarvis is constantly on alert for nearly imperceptible threats to auto engage before Tony could even react or simply without His input. I mean we now have pretty decently self driving cars, albeit with room for improvement, they can parallel park, tell if somethings in their path, stop or attempt to avoid collisions, and maneuver down a highway pretty easily… so it’s probably safe to say tony incorporated micro thrusters akin to those on satellites or large sea vessels to maintain stability or do fine course corrections.
Regardless great insights here, I’ve seen this vid a couple times over the years and it’s always a joy!! Thanks dude!
12:10
It depends on what kind of projectile hits him and if it's hit as you have assumed wich is basicly worst case scenario or if it's glancing hit (bounce) wich can be anywhere from deadly to survivable.
From the short clip shown in movie my best guess for shell type is some kind of HEAT shell wich uses explosives in the shell to get trough armor.
Ok
love the way you transmit you passion to physics. I'd love to assits to your classes, sincerely.
This was a very nice video on exploring the physics of Ironman. & while I was not upset by the "nitpick" [which was fair to point out] I still really appreciate your concern. Its good to keep the optimism going, & it still ticked a lot of boxes as to how plausible such a suit would exist in real life & that's what I loved most of all.
Incredible video. Fun and informative. Loved it, and I've watched a lot of videos about science of superheroes
Thx for making this video
Love this video, thanks
Awesome video! Inspiring aspect of physics. Keep it up :)
Great video!!!!! Aside from the inertia dampeners lol you should do more videos of this this one was really good
I enjoyed this video
Thanks for making this video
Glad someone finally mentioned momentum conservation
guys that is why its call a MOVIE. and a great one too... just sit back and enjoy it dhaaa.
I can't believe TH-cam brought this to me after 4yrs, this video is amazing ❤️❤️
10:24 I would like to point out that that number is the total energy consumed over the distance.
And that’s a fraction of what the reactor produces in a second. So basically, with these assumptions, the suit could fly 10km in under a second (starting with 0m/s)
Great video!
Damn !! It didn't feel like a 20+ min video !!
Kudos mate ! Great job !! 👌👌👍👍
I really enjoyed and learned a few things from this video. Keep it up ❤️
The point of the arc reactor is that it is self-replicating, and once you get it going, it doesn't stop. Like cold fusion is supposed to be. Man, cold fusion, that takes me back. Val Kilmer's movie the Saint was about that, too.
Just discovered this channel from the ycombinator interview. I love it. The new bleeding edge iron man armor from infinity war might allow for some sci-if momentum dampening effects though. Going on a tangent here, but could you do a video on how the postulates for schrodingers wave equation came into being, like the wave function has to be continuous especially at the boundary of a finite potential, etc ... and also how did max born choose to interpret schrodingers wave eqn as a probability distribution by taking the magnitude of the complex wave function? How did max born even thought of the wave eqn this way ? Thanks 🤘🏿
Thanks for the comment -- yeah Tony's tech got pretty close to star trek over the Inifinity War and Endgame movies.
Interesting idea for a video on the origin of quantum theory. I'll have to think about it -- but I'd also have to do some research since I don't actually know the full story of the early history of the field.
Great video I hope you eventually do more like this
I really loved this video, as an Iron Man fan, your explanation was marvelous, very great one!
I wish i had a physics teacher like you.
Thanks for mentioning the acceleration, I kept thinking when watching that he would have turned into mush so many times.
In the Three Body Problem series of sci-fi novels (highly recommend, but spoilers ahead FYI to anyone reading this), this exact pasting actually happens to the entire crew of a couple ships, whose captains override safety systems and activate 120g acceleration despite none of the crew being immersed in (and breathing diffused oxygen from) inert fluid which would otherwise have been required for them to survive. Quite a way to kick the bucket for sure.
That was fascinating. Thank you.
this video saved me for my physics project, thank you
cold fusion is what its more similar to just that no major strides have been done with it in decades.
Thank you Professor. You don't know how useful your video is. Thank You once again.
Amazing Video, i like your enthusiastic approach it was very enjoyable!
My understanding of the momentum issue was that the forces are distributed uniformly through his body by diamagnetic repulsion, similar to the levitating frog demo, but scaled up.
Like these explanations thank you
Become a very big fan of yours from last some days.I like the way you are explaining the physics behind IronMan armor(India).
Glad to hear you enjoyed it Nisha!
Sir my name is Tanish. Nisha is my aunt's name.
Thanks sir for the explanation 👍🏼
love this video
Awesome video
Great video! Very informative and efucational!
I really enjoyed it keep it up
The math you were doing for the 3MJ/second would be for the FIRST ARC reactor.
As you remember, when Tony has to use the old reactor at the end of the movie, Jarvis said the reactor wasn't set for continuous flight.
So the new ARC reactor was producing MORE power than the first one.
BRILLIANTT, THANK YOU FOR MAKING THIS VIDEO PROFESSOR.
I am a high school student from Indonesia and im really interested in physics. I wanna ask professor, is it possible to make a flying tech, imagine its like a long shoes that at the calves part i make a slim hole that fits aerodinamicly with my legs and works like a vacuum cleaner, sucking air in big mass and push the sucked air from my foot to act as a booster so that i can fly, and also make the same tech in my arms to control the direction when im flying. I cant stop thinking about this theory lately but i need a professional to guide me, i hope i will be as smart as you and you responded to this thoughts, thank you professor.
Hi, thanks for the comment. Well what you are describing is similar to the way regular jets work (which heat up air to make it expand and push it out the back) or drone engines (which are just fans to push the air) so it would definitely be possible according to physics! The challenge is to have a light and powerful source of energy to make it all work. The recent progress in drones is partly because of better batteries, but you'd need something even better to lift a human and keep them flying for a reasonable time.
You should try putting that device on your Center of mass so yo can probably fly or hover without falling becouse of your legs balance
@@SimonBenjamin what if we use the air as source of energy.Like as it can be used to make renewable energy..
Hey i am actually interested in ur idea
I am ready to make this true
I too wanna make this dream come true
Let's make a real suite
what about heat distribution this is a big thing if it made thrust that can lift you in that kind of space there isn't a metal that can last very long without melting and fusing with your hands and feat
Wow... your explanation was super clear ... I understood everything that you explained and it was interesting.
Great video
Sir your way of explanation is beautiful enjoyed this video very much I wish if you are my physics professor it would be amazing 🤗
Bro this video is awesome you did a great job explaining it
Very good video professor, thank you for making it.
Thanks for watching!
Always wondered these questions, thanks for the vidoe prof. Subbed.
Fascinating
i like your explanation sir.
I thought the Arc Reactor is real but it’s just not miniaturized.
As far as I know, it’s a made up thing at any scale. But it definitely sounds like a real thing so good job to the writers! I suppose in the movie it was a real thing before Tony got captured and then he miniaturised it - but in real life it isn’t a thing at all. Maybe you need to invent it :)
I think what addresses the momentum problem was the metal used in his recent armors. It is a fictional element Vibranium wich can absorb huge amount of energy. Of course I'm still doubting on how Tony handled that momentum problem before he started using Vibranium.
This is a really interesting video, loved it! I also recently thought about how in the opening scene of iron Man 2, he's doing a superhero landing going from what seems to be very high speeds to a complete stop in an extremely short time. So I was wondering how he could stay completely safe and sound after such a extreme impact and acceleration, and also how he didn't just fell through the platform helanded on 😂
As long as the suit is moving at the exact same speed as Tony than it’s ok. Same thing as when your driving a car. As long as you are going the same speed as the car than your ok. It’s when you keep moving vs the suit or the car your in that you die or get hurt. Hope that made sense
@@RONJAE212003 yup, when your car suddenly stops, you'll still have momentum, same for Tony's suit!
really love the enthusiasm bruv
I Love when you say "pasted" lol
Sounds like a concussion. Good point about the suit. He's taken so many hits. Can't wait to watch the movie with physics in mind.
Don't know if you will see this but I watched an engineer critique Tony's suit and remarks on the detail they put in place where they show mini-thrusters through our the suit it you couple that with an advanced AI it would be able to counter the event without his input. Main issue would be what his suit is made of, this is where they take a scifi side step with vibranium
I loved this video Sir..🙂
I think I have to watch this video 5 more times. Great explanation with a light of speed😊
For the shell example, you are assuming that he stops the shell, but, you can see in the video, that it makes him "spin" and therefore the motion deflects some of the impact?
I seen the references to heat vs power generated arguments and the thing I find missing is is the reference to the material used. Palladium is not radioactive in any way. It is more of a Platinum metal by atomic charts. In order for it to produce the required amounts of power it would require it to be a metal of the uranium family of metals. There by producing lethal amounts of radiation.
Extremely adorable sir...Hats off to you!!!
Kindly make more videos like that
I'd like to make more when I get the chance!
Moscovium plates distributed over the surface of his suit. Perfect fix. Moscovium(element 115) is postulated to generate gravity. The plate configuration could be such to generate a gravity well around his body enabling it to withstand or nullify inertial forces. Of course, he would've discovered the means to stabilize that ephemeral element.