Qualcomm is seriously a game-changer in the tech world, but their leadership really dropped the ball when it comes to selling themselves as the innovators.
Yeah I own 100 shares just for fun, but doubt they have what it takes going forward. Seems like the are going the way of Rambus, with a lot of patents in their portfolio but not much to show for it. CDMA was cool however, and groundbreaking, as the video says.
@@Veronica-d3g2jNot to be rude but keep dreaming. Smartphones have gotten to the point where they are at their peak and people are less willingly to change their perfectly working phone for a slightly better one. We have reached a point where phones don’t need to be better because the productivity and user experience would be same compared to whatever better phone comes out. The next big thing would be AR, VR, and AI that they could thrive in.
@@maxpro751 wanna bet I'm a woman and woman are always willing to pay for the next big thing and I am sure after leaving Apple they had in mind in creating a competitive platform in Cells and compete with all the major players .
I see Qualcomm as Texas Instruments a few years ago. For some time, they were at the fore front of technology, and everyone knew them and their products. After some shifts in the market, the brand was no longer at the fore front, but still quite relevant, and still quite present inside the products we use daily.
@@baburo101 good point! Thank you for that. I confess I totally forgot about that. Mainly because I gave mine to a friendly neighbor 10 years ago. Moreover, here in Portugal, Europe, the Japanese brand Casio is calculator brand mostly used at schools - despite me buying a better Texas Instruments.
@@hitardo Texas Instruments is one of the largest IC designer and manufacturers in the world. They're a market leader in microcontrollers, DSP's, mixed-signal, and analog IC's. They are very much at the forefront of the tech industry.
5:54 he explains the problem here. Qualcomm’s product is an SoC that is sold to other big businesses for use in their end user products. It doesn’t have the brand value that BMW, Samsung have even though they own the design patents that those companies rely on for their products. Nvidia and Intel on the other hand have built brand reputation directly with consumers for years. Their sticker is always on the laptop for example. Qualcomm is a hidden background player that people don’t know about.
Sold my APPL before it tanked, will buy at next major drop. I’d definitely need to make use of the $250k liquidity elsewhere. So what should I be looking at? Large cap or small cap stocks? Maybe crypto?
It’s going to be a wild year for these sectors, so you should def. invest in crypto. 60% of my portfolio is spread across tech stocks, crypto and Crypto/Gold ETF
Yes, my asset manager advised I spread further into mutual funds and crypto Etf and boy am I glad I did. The whole idea is: Don’t get too greedy and also to exit at the right time, so generally I do find having an adviser very helpful.
could you recommend some good advisers? don’t get me wrong, I already have an asset manager for my $5m portfolio, but he seems not to know much about crypto.
I live in part of Southern California, its surreal driving on the highway and seeing easily a dozen buildings with the Qualcomm logo on them in the foothills of San Diego.
I am seeking some investment guidance. It seems like I am never able to identify trends, options always go against me, and I can't utilize scanners efficiently. I am looking for a simple reproducible passive income strategy that supplements my income and eventually replace my wage income.
Yes, It's the right approach, and they must be focussed on many other sectors, with Auto for the start, with impacts on medical wellness, they need the insights for telemedicine with Auto Alerts moderated by qualified doctors on regular checks, revolutionizes Food Industry in AI based Agricultural activities, other impacts on Logistics in Delivery Services is huge where the AI led Demand Generated Quants used for Current Operative Demand requirements, Industry 4.0!
Those running homelab can already run AI ML models offline without internet connection. It isn't straight forward atm so I guess this is gonna be more user friendly in the future.
There is no doubt that we want Generative AI or future forms of AI in our devices because our mobile phones and devices need to be fast and private and have capabilities beyond internet connectivity.
I wonder how AI would do advising city folk on surviving in unfamiliar environments - either other countries or the wilderness. It would be really fun to watch it try to help it's human symbiote survive in a new environment based on its sensory synthesis and knowledgebase.
0:07: 💡 Qualcomm, a pioneer in wireless technology, is now focusing on generative AI and diversification as it faces challenges from Apple's silicon development and declining smartphone chip sales. 3:35: 💼 Qualcomm is a chip maker and licensing company that plays a significant role in the smartphone industry. 7:00: 💡 Qualcomm is diversifying its chip manufacturing by building plants in the US, but its deal to supply chips for Apple's iPhone won't last forever. 10:21: 📉 Shipments are on track to hit their lowest point in a decade, but Qualcomm is diversifying its focus to chips for cars, AR/VR headsets, and PCs. 14:33: 📱 Qualcomm is focusing on enabling devices for generative AI, combining cloud and device power. Recap by Tammy AI
I remember when AI first made its way into mobile phones, enabling features like background removal, face changing, and apps that could create content with a single click. However, in recent years, AI on mobile devices seems to have fallen behind, while web-based applications and PC computers have surged ahead.
I don't know if they legally can, the Adreno line of GPUs is derived from AMD's Radeon GPU IP. It wouldn't surprise me if there was a clause in that contract restricting them from releasing standalone GPUs. Even if they create their own GPUs from the ground up they would have to prove that they didn't use what they learned from using Radeon's IP to create their own GPU IP.
Not many companies in the world have the expertise in chip design and QCOM is one of top 3 in the world. Combined with their knowledge in networking, they are in a very rare position to benefit from AI in combination with all their expertise. This company stock will not stay this cheap for much longer. Once the apple revenues clear the pipes and investors see where the new streams of revenue will come from this will take off with no end in sight for at least 5-8 years.
this video greatly explains why apple is apple and it still doesnt have real competition, they do big steps and then everybody follows *sorry for my english
That's not really true anymore. It's 10 years the only innovation they brought to the table was anti-consumer stuff, while the good stuff was brought out by Android phone manufacturers (Samsung, Chinese brands, etc) and then copied and almost always actually perfected by Apple. The last 10 years have seen "Android innovates, Apple does it right". Lately, it's "Android innovates AND makes it right, Apple copies it sometimes badly and closes it down". Also note that Apple always has a monopoly on the latest production nodes, despite having nothing to do with its development. So, Qualcomm and other manufacturers actually manage to match it with weaker nodes that are less powerful and less efficient.
@@Anankin12lol bizarre take, not even close. Apple are constantly innovating. They leapfrogged the computer cpu industry with their M series processors. They brought wireless earbuds to the masses, smart watches to the masses, and are about to bring spatial computing to the masses, to name just a few innovations of the past less-than-ten-years.
@@BusterDarcy they didn't, the M2 is a powerful CPU but price to performance is worse than x64 chips. And peak performance is lower than peak x64 performance. An i9 or R9 laptop's CPU is more powerful than a M2 Ultra, a 4080 has better GPU performance. And they cost similarly. What Apple does great is achieving similar performance to those listed components using a fraction of the power. A R9/i9 4080, 4090 laptop will NOT last 20 hours of even light use, while the M2 macs will. The mac pro is behind even midrange desktop components. Which is why the Mac Pro is absurd.
@@Anankin12their target market is netflix youtube social media consuming crowd majorly so thier m2 based products with high battery life suits perfectly with their customer they dont pust their device to maximum so they dont need a high peak performance apples philosophy is perfect creat a well polished premium looking a good (not advance or greatest) performing device with decent display and customers will buy!
I wonder how these chip companies in the West of America are going to get their water, and if they do, I hope they are recycling and decontaminating their water byproduct.
The timing of this video and the tone of this video being more like a Qualcomm ad is an eerie coincidence. Qualcomm is being let down by Apple on one side and Huawei on the other side. Combined together they are looking at upwards of 20% revenue decline. This video subtly brushed this major point aside as “we don’t get hit by that much”. Dear CNBC, was this video paid for or sponsored by Qualcomm in any direct/indirect way? If so, the viewers need to know.
Qualcomm and Apple sued each other - not a long term partnership maker. Apple keeps getting deeper into the chips and that won't stop and their dependence on others will wane, more and more.
Qualcomm is seriously a game-changer in the tech world, but their leadership really dropped the ball when it comes to selling themselves as the innovators.
Make Linux/Windows ARM laptops that can outcompete the MBP for performance, battery life and build quality. There is literally no competition to the MBP in the ultrabook space - despite MacOS being largely useless for the majority of use cases Also make gaming handhelds!
I think global car companies needs to rethink using American made chips. Its amazing how the US Government can do things to you or your American purchased products in the names of national security .
The question is which company is going to build the quantum microprocessor for phones, tabs, etc. It will be most likely be Qualcomm or ARM unless Microsoft ups their game and comes out with the first.
Depending on how vicious ARM feels about it, Qualcomm may drop dead literally. Take away from this is if you are renting/licensing space/technology, you could get kicked out or stopped cold on your track.
The Ai goldrush is coming to an end and Nvidia is going to suffer dearly for putting all their eggs in one basket . Qualcomm dodged a bullet by not trying to keep up with the Ai GPU market . The next big market will be making chips spec'd for spacecraft for when we get into asteroid mining .
this feels like a puff piece for Qualcomm. it’s very interesting, but their solutions to build future revenue seem…overly optimistic. offline AI doesn’t seem like its really going to be in demand in a fully connected world, and trying to break into pretty established markets seems difficult. i’d be happy to see an american company succeed but this just doesn’t seem like an unbiased analysis of the state of the company
The AI planned down the pipeline will 100% need offline AI. Already, car detection systems with AI use offline chips, so safety isn't reliant on connectivity. Even outside of critical infrastructure, there is a need. A phone that uses AI for camera, personal assistant, and automation tasks will feel like a brick the moment the connection to the cloud is laggy or saturated. This doesn't even mean they will be totally offline, in some cases data will likely be streamed to them in a low bandwith format which the phone will then proccess the computationally expensive task locally. This isn't about everyone being able to talk to chatgpt at the same time, this is about cars, phones and all internet devices being so intwined the demand for proccesing data will block out the availible speed and bandwith. NVIDA tried to centralize their GPUs in a datacenter and stream video games to people. It failed, partly due to the service quality and partly because for what they could charge the profit wasn't there for what it cost. The same company's gpus now run cloud AI. Right now, with each individual casually interacting with AI its working. When every smartphone, car etc has mutiple functions constantly requiring AI proccessing its going to need an onboard chip to work.
We don't need to run models locally. Does he even understand the insane amount of compute and energy needed to run these models? Everyone is better off accessing these models off the internet.
Everyone has a five minutes fame. Then fade into obscurity. The industries that have staying power are food, pharmaceuticals, defence and funeral homes.
What may end Qualcomm's reign is the possibility the US Federal Trade Commission looking into whether Qualcomm are using their patents on 5G modem design to keep out competitors. The issue of using patents to keep out competitors is not a new one, as the famous _U.S. v United Shoe Machinery Company_ case from the 1940's showed. To keep the Feds off their backs, Qualcomm may have to allow more competitors in the 5G modem market if Qualcomm wants to enter other lucrative markets such ard artificial intelligence hardware.
I just hope smart cars don’t end up like smart TVs, and they take forever to turn on and hardly work and have all these features and functionality that you don’t use
Wait, do you think cryptocurrency will crash? I dont think so. More and more companies are integrating cryptocurrency into their operations: Amazon, Cannafarm Ltd, Burger King, even Starbucks, dude!
Qualcomm is seriously a game-changer in the tech world, but their leadership really dropped the ball when it comes to selling themselves as the innovators.
Yeah I own 100 shares just for fun, but doubt they have what it takes going forward. Seems like the are going the way of Rambus, with a lot of patents in their portfolio but not much to show for it. CDMA was cool however, and groundbreaking, as the video says.
I bet they will start creating their own cell phones soon !
@@Veronica-d3g2jNot to be rude but keep dreaming. Smartphones have gotten to the point where they are at their peak and people are less willingly to change their perfectly working phone for a slightly better one. We have reached a point where phones don’t need to be better because the productivity and user experience would be same compared to whatever better phone comes out. The next big thing would be AR, VR, and AI that they could thrive in.
@@maxpro751 wanna bet I'm a woman and woman are always willing to pay for the next big thing and I am sure after leaving Apple they had in mind in creating a competitive platform in Cells and compete with all the major players .
@@raylopez99 they're on the brink of chapter 11, there no future with these company AI venture that aren't up to the snuff.
I see Qualcomm as Texas Instruments a few years ago.
For some time, they were at the fore front of technology, and everyone knew them and their products.
After some shifts in the market, the brand was no longer at the fore front, but still quite relevant, and still quite present inside the products we use daily.
Calculators?
@@baburo101 good point!
Thank you for that.
I confess I totally forgot about that.
Mainly because I gave mine to a friendly neighbor 10 years ago.
Moreover, here in Portugal, Europe, the Japanese brand Casio is calculator brand mostly used at schools - despite me buying a better Texas Instruments.
@@hitardo Texas Instruments is one of the largest IC designer and manufacturers in the world. They're a market leader in microcontrollers, DSP's, mixed-signal, and analog IC's. They are very much at the forefront of the tech industry.
@@baburo101anti tank missile too
5:54 he explains the problem here. Qualcomm’s product is an SoC that is sold to other big businesses for use in their end user products. It doesn’t have the brand value that BMW, Samsung have even though they own the design patents that those companies rely on for their products.
Nvidia and Intel on the other hand have built brand reputation directly with consumers for years. Their sticker is always on the laptop for example. Qualcomm is a hidden background player that people don’t know about.
Sold my APPL before it tanked, will buy at next major drop. I’d definitely need to make use of the $250k liquidity elsewhere. So what should I be looking at? Large cap or small cap stocks? Maybe crypto?
It’s going to be a wild year for these sectors, so you should def. invest in crypto. 60% of my portfolio is spread across tech stocks, crypto and Crypto/Gold ETF
Yes, my asset manager advised I spread further into mutual funds and crypto Etf and boy am I glad I did. The whole idea is: Don’t get too greedy and also to exit at the right time, so generally I do find having an adviser very helpful.
could you recommend some good advisers? don’t get me wrong, I already have an asset manager for my $5m portfolio, but he seems not to know much about crypto.
‘Aileen Gertrude Tippy” is the licensed advisor I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment
Cheers buddy. Smart and great looking lady. Hopefully will my time. I left messages, was told to expect feedback. Thank you.
I love the educational content keep up the good work 👍
Edu-advert!
I live in part of Southern California, its surreal driving on the highway and seeing easily a dozen buildings with the Qualcomm logo on them in the foothills of San Diego.
As a homeless person let me tell you I live in one of those buildings
I am seeking some investment guidance. It seems like I am never able to identify trends, options always go against me, and I can't utilize scanners efficiently. I am looking for a simple reproducible passive income strategy that supplements my income and eventually replace my wage income.
I'm not a professional, I use a broker (Michelle Christine Parker) I follow her signals to make trades, why don't you look her up on google
I'm not a proffessional, I use an adviser (Michelle Christine Parker) I follow her signals to make trades, why don't you look her up on google
I read that she advised the famous valvoline's IPO and DowDupont's spinoff of Dow Inc. Must be so good.
I'm not a professional. I follow the instructions os an adviser (Michelle Christine Parker)
Running locally these ML models would be great for privacy!
Yes, It's the right approach, and they must be focussed on many other sectors, with Auto for the start, with impacts on medical wellness, they need the insights for telemedicine with Auto Alerts moderated by qualified doctors on regular checks, revolutionizes Food Industry in AI based Agricultural activities, other impacts on Logistics in Delivery Services is huge where the AI led Demand Generated Quants used for Current Operative Demand requirements, Industry 4.0!
On-device AI is definitely the future, especially with humanoid robots and autonomous vehicles.
Not if AI is regulated such that only large corporations are allowed to run the good AI inference engines on the cloud.
always informative....love this CNBC short series....keep it up
I love CNBC’s Content 😎
This is the 1st time I have seen unbiased reporting from the Economist
They nailed their 8 Gen 2 SoC this year.
Oohh yeah. Absolutely incredible chip. completely MURDERS 8 Gen 1(+)
@@Tommy-qe6fh also the 8 gen 1
@@baburo101 nah 8 gen 1 was overheating garbage, I had the s22 and the chip difference from the s22 to s23 is insane, 8 gen 1 was garbage
Those running homelab can already run AI ML models offline without internet connection.
It isn't straight forward atm so I guess this is gonna be more user friendly in the future.
Veey informative. Thank you CNBC!
There is no doubt that we want Generative AI or future forms of AI in our devices because our mobile phones and devices need to be fast and private and have capabilities beyond internet connectivity.
lol. you wanting AI and privacy at the same time? 😂
@@GoogleAccount-rt7rlComplete your homework kiddo
4:25 Daniel "The Egg" Newman 😂
It's a pleasure to work as a software developer partner on Qualcomm chip to deliver next-generation electric vehicle solutions to the world.
I wonder how AI would do advising city folk on surviving in unfamiliar environments - either other countries or the wilderness. It would be really fun to watch it try to help it's human symbiote survive in a new environment based on its sensory synthesis and knowledgebase.
0:07: 💡 Qualcomm, a pioneer in wireless technology, is now focusing on generative AI and diversification as it faces challenges from Apple's silicon development and declining smartphone chip sales.
3:35: 💼 Qualcomm is a chip maker and licensing company that plays a significant role in the smartphone industry.
7:00: 💡 Qualcomm is diversifying its chip manufacturing by building plants in the US, but its deal to supply chips for Apple's iPhone won't last forever.
10:21: 📉 Shipments are on track to hit their lowest point in a decade, but Qualcomm is diversifying its focus to chips for cars, AR/VR headsets, and PCs.
14:33: 📱 Qualcomm is focusing on enabling devices for generative AI, combining cloud and device power.
Recap by Tammy AI
I remember when AI first made its way into mobile phones, enabling features like background removal, face changing, and apps that could create content with a single click. However, in recent years, AI on mobile devices seems to have fallen behind, while web-based applications and PC computers have surged ahead.
Offline AI is the way to go for privacy & security
Qualcomm makes decent GPU's in their smartphone SOC's, they should get into PC GPU market
I don't know if they legally can, the Adreno line of GPUs is derived from AMD's Radeon GPU IP. It wouldn't surprise me if there was a clause in that contract restricting them from releasing standalone GPUs. Even if they create their own GPUs from the ground up they would have to prove that they didn't use what they learned from using Radeon's IP to create their own GPU IP.
wow finally something that actually works tysm u earned a subscriber
Not many companies in the world have the expertise in chip design and QCOM is one of top 3 in the world. Combined with their knowledge in networking, they are in a very rare position to benefit from AI in combination with all their expertise. This company stock will not stay this cheap for much longer. Once the apple revenues clear the pipes and investors see where the new streams of revenue will come from this will take off with no end in sight for at least 5-8 years.
Thank you for great reporting
Nvidia is one of the worst companies based on their anti-consumer behavior in the GPU market and I bet that behavior will follow them into AI.
If no one comes close to what Nvidia can do they can charge whatever they want😔
this video greatly explains why apple is apple and it still doesnt have real competition, they do big steps and then everybody follows *sorry for my english
That's not really true anymore. It's 10 years the only innovation they brought to the table was anti-consumer stuff, while the good stuff was brought out by Android phone manufacturers (Samsung, Chinese brands, etc) and then copied and almost always actually perfected by Apple.
The last 10 years have seen "Android innovates, Apple does it right".
Lately, it's "Android innovates AND makes it right, Apple copies it sometimes badly and closes it down".
Also note that Apple always has a monopoly on the latest production nodes, despite having nothing to do with its development. So, Qualcomm and other manufacturers actually manage to match it with weaker nodes that are less powerful and less efficient.
@@Anankin12lol bizarre take, not even close. Apple are constantly innovating. They leapfrogged the computer cpu industry with their M series processors. They brought wireless earbuds to the masses, smart watches to the masses, and are about to bring spatial computing to the masses, to name just a few innovations of the past less-than-ten-years.
@@Anankin12tell you are a blind android fantard without telling me you are a blind android fantard.
@@BusterDarcy they didn't, the M2 is a powerful CPU but price to performance is worse than x64 chips. And peak performance is lower than peak x64 performance.
An i9 or R9 laptop's CPU is more powerful than a M2 Ultra, a 4080 has better GPU performance. And they cost similarly.
What Apple does great is achieving similar performance to those listed components using a fraction of the power. A R9/i9 4080, 4090 laptop will NOT last 20 hours of even light use, while the M2 macs will.
The mac pro is behind even midrange desktop components. Which is why the Mac Pro is absurd.
@@Anankin12their target market is netflix youtube social media consuming crowd majorly so thier m2 based products with high battery life suits perfectly with their customer they dont pust their device to maximum so they dont need a high peak performance apples philosophy is perfect creat a well polished premium looking a good (not advance or greatest) performing device with decent display and customers will buy!
Lot of innovation and super cool
Very soon fewer Qualcomm chip will be used or needed in the phone market .As a cheaper & more efficient chip from China will supply most of the phone.
Might be a good time to buy shares here.
What was the name of the Chinese guy who created the first cdma chip for Qualcomm ?
I wonder how these chip companies in the West of America are going to get their water, and if they do, I hope they are recycling and decontaminating their water byproduct.
I hope so. Water is precious.
Its dufficult to compete if your cost is high and the tech and design Hua Wei can produce and compete with?
Comment please!
Why don't they make ARM CPUs for PC's?
The timing of this video and the tone of this video being more like a Qualcomm ad is an eerie coincidence. Qualcomm is being let down by Apple on one side and Huawei on the other side. Combined together they are looking at upwards of 20% revenue decline. This video subtly brushed this major point aside as “we don’t get hit by that much”. Dear CNBC, was this video paid for or sponsored by Qualcomm in any direct/indirect way? If so, the viewers need to know.
exactly, too many videos praising Qualcomm lately without enough data, or logic, or both.
Qualcomm and Apple sued each other - not a long term partnership maker.
Apple keeps getting deeper into the chips and that won't stop and their dependence on others will wane, more and more.
So nice that Qualcomm support American fabs!
Qualcomm use TsMC and Samsung for there production of its chips. Not American
@@TomTomdogQualcomm produces chips too!!
That’s why I’m long on QCOM. Phenomenal company that is leading in innovative tech. Nice recap of their product!
13:55 I think that the announcer understood "on airplane mode" as the new thing. Don't blame her, but interesting.
Qualcomm's idea is the tech Apple needs to sell more phones.
Qualcomm is seriously a game-changer in the tech world, but their leadership really dropped the ball when it comes to selling themselves as the innovators.
Hey privacy advocates, you are the product.
I want Chris Patrick to voice my GPS..
Can’t wait to read about them and BlackBerry among all the tech companies that died in the 21st century.
They're still able to raise prices with impunity, despite not being nvidia & having trash development tools.
Is Qualcomm looking at developing RISC-V CPUs?
Great technology
Please make that coffee cup available for purchase.
Too bad Qualcomm does not have a Fab. They have to rely on TSMC or Samsung for their chips
Loving my ThinkPad X13s 5G-connected laptop powered by a Snapdragon chip. The battery life is unreal!
Compassion
ciao! hai perfettamente ragione
They need to invent special ARM for AI. That's what can propel them.
Make Linux/Windows ARM laptops that can outcompete the MBP for performance, battery life and build quality. There is literally no competition to the MBP in the ultrabook space - despite MacOS being largely useless for the majority of use cases
Also make gaming handhelds!
china's new phone that they said is going to use its own chip is not true, it is still american technology and chips
Schmitt Walks
Why would they show iPhones lol. It might be arm architecture but not Qualcomm
1:42 RIP Qualcomm 😂
Dont get me wrong but cnbc do good content !
Qualcomm did not fall tor third place because of Nvidia - MediaTek is crushing them with low-cost cell functions chips designed in Taiwan!
They are good in every sector. Better is to be great in one thing. It will fall for sure.
Ofc you know there is a QC SD chip in that Samsung 😅 you really dont want the Exynos version 😅
I'm wondering how far EU is behind on these :(
I think global car companies needs to rethink using American made chips. Its amazing how the US Government can do things to you or your American purchased products in the names of national security .
Skynet coming near you
yes
"I'm gonna go get the papers, get the papers."
The question is which company is going to build the quantum microprocessor for phones, tabs, etc. It will be most likely be Qualcomm or ARM unless Microsoft ups their game and comes out with the first.
Depending on how vicious ARM feels about it, Qualcomm may drop dead literally. Take away from this is if you are renting/licensing space/technology, you could get kicked out or stopped cold on your track.
The Ai goldrush is coming to an end and Nvidia is going to suffer dearly for putting all their eggs in one basket . Qualcomm dodged a bullet by not trying to keep up with the Ai GPU market . The next big market will be making chips spec'd for spacecraft for when we get into asteroid mining .
crazy to think we are almost in the AI world
3:41 He looks and sounds like Morpheus.
Chris Patrick’s voice though
With or without Apple? Apple is an empire! It needs Apple and all other OEM platforms
this feels like a puff piece for Qualcomm. it’s very interesting, but their solutions to build future revenue seem…overly optimistic. offline AI doesn’t seem like its really going to be in demand in a fully connected world, and trying to break into pretty established markets seems difficult. i’d be happy to see an american company succeed but this just doesn’t seem like an unbiased analysis of the state of the company
The AI planned down the pipeline will 100% need offline AI. Already, car detection systems with AI use offline chips, so safety isn't reliant on connectivity. Even outside of critical infrastructure, there is a need. A phone that uses AI for camera, personal assistant, and automation tasks will feel like a brick the moment the connection to the cloud is laggy or saturated. This doesn't even mean they will be totally offline, in some cases data will likely be streamed to them in a low bandwith format which the phone will then proccess the computationally expensive task locally.
This isn't about everyone being able to talk to chatgpt at the same time, this is about cars, phones and all internet devices being so intwined the demand for proccesing data will block out the availible speed and bandwith.
NVIDA tried to centralize their GPUs in a datacenter and stream video games to people. It failed, partly due to the service quality and partly because for what they could charge the profit wasn't there for what it cost. The same company's gpus now run cloud AI. Right now, with each individual casually interacting with AI its working. When every smartphone, car etc has mutiple functions constantly requiring AI proccessing its going to need an onboard chip to work.
Qualcom can have bright future in India 🇮🇳
The guy speaking at 10:25 doesn't sound very confident in the words that he is saying
AI is a potential miracle, It can materialize my fantasy in image.
when a company does CNBC special... its a marketing gemic and means DONT INVEST... too much time on their hands.
Shameless infomercial on CNBC for Qualcomm without due disclosure.
узнал много нового про альткоины из твоего обзора я даже не думал, что сейчас есть столько крутых перспективных монеток
no one/company/country will ever be king for long... they always get dethrone sooner or later.
Is it just me or does Christopher Patrick sound 🇹🇹?
👍
Franecki Freeway
Doesnt even give free chips wven if 2 res
Why they didn’t bet their chip makers instead Taiwan to S Korea, China never claimed S Korea as their territory and threatened to reunite it though
north Korea will 😂
@@wangyaohan8824 oops , I forgot Kim 😂
@@kenyup7936 😂😂😂
Qualcomm has patent future chips that have not even been made. The technology is way off from our future.
We don't need to run models locally. Does he even understand the insane amount of compute and energy needed to run these models? Everyone is better off accessing these models off the internet.
Everyone has a five minutes fame. Then fade into obscurity. The industries that have staying power are food, pharmaceuticals, defence and funeral homes.
What may end Qualcomm's reign is the possibility the US Federal Trade Commission looking into whether Qualcomm are using their patents on 5G modem design to keep out competitors. The issue of using patents to keep out competitors is not a new one, as the famous _U.S. v United Shoe Machinery Company_ case from the 1940's showed. To keep the Feds off their backs, Qualcomm may have to allow more competitors in the 5G modem market if Qualcomm wants to enter other lucrative markets such ard artificial intelligence hardware.
I just hope smart cars don’t end up like smart TVs, and they take forever to turn on and hardly work and have all these features and functionality that you don’t use
Apple will launch its chip in 2024
Which one are you talking about
@@TomTomdog i don’t know my sister is working on it , she said they will launch in may i think
Wait, do you think cryptocurrency will crash? I dont think so. More and more companies are integrating cryptocurrency into their operations: Amazon, Cannafarm Ltd, Burger King, even Starbucks, dude!
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Qualcomm is intel of mobile chip
6:26
The day I'll be able to shoot videos like iPhone on Qualcomm chips, the day I'll choose snapdragon phones.
Apple wants to monopolize everything, I bet. Apple won't survived long because of their greediness no doubt.