Ave Milites! I am back! Make sure to support the channel by liking and commenting. Get notified by subscribing and pushing the notification bell. You can support the channel by checking our partner spqrshop.com/ref/Aditu-Laudis/ and purchasing something cool for yourself or a friend. See you in the next one!
Attila is often lied to by Western historians because it annoys them that he beat them to shit, especially slapping the Romans in the ass as they fled. But they forget that it was with the disintegration of the Roman Empire that the formation of independent nations began.
The Huns are still the toughest people in Europe. No one could destroy them. They have their own unique ancient language, some that no one understands, and strangers find it very difficult to learn. Their culture and folk art date back to the Scythians.
@@izidorkohn1908 But Scythians weren't Turkic people Sure they were mixed with Huns during the 4th or 5th century AD but their origin was Iranian or Indo European It's even mentioned they spoke in Iranian languages
Y porqué hay que traducir al anglosajón?😢 el anglosajón no tiene nada de la gracia necesaria para hacer traducciones, en cambio el idioma que aquí se utiliza es completamente válido para hacerse entender mundialmente ❤😊
A nyugatiak már csak ilyenek! Össze -vissza hazudoznak! Ha Atila vesztett Catalaunum-nál ,akkor hogy lehet ,hogy Aetius eltűnt a csatamezőről ,mert a gótok királyuk elvesztése után elvonultak a csatatérről?Meggyengítve a római hadat! és HOL volt Aetius a következő évben Aquiella ostromakor? és Hol volt a sereg? és akkor amikor Ravenna elfoglalása után Róma ellen vonult? Hol volt Aetius és az állítólagos római had??Amúgy, a franciák felásták az egész Catalaunumi síkot és SEMMIT sem találtak, nemhogy egy törött kardot ,de még egy sisakot vagy legalább egy fésűt sem! Semmit sem találtak! Tehát ,ha volt csata az nem Catalaunum- nál volt! Amúgy Atila elfoglalta egész észak Franciaországot és a térképük is hamis itt! Mivel egyértelműen felsorolják címei között a "dánok és médek királya" Sőt dél Skandináviát (Svéd-ország) is elfoglaltákl! Média pedig délen van Észak-Perzsiában. Továbbá tudjuk ,hogy a teljes Közép-Ázsia is az uralma alá tartozott...19 évnyi uralkodása alatt kétszer is visszatért oda "Nagy haddal"rendet rakni!....Hazugságokra tanítják a nyugatiakat, a nagy magyar gyűlöletük is részben ennek köszönhető! Nameg a NagyBoldogasszony kultuszunknak ,mivel a magya-rok mindig is matriarchatusban éltek,még sziszteműk is matriarchális volt!Szemben az ösz-szes európai néppel ,akik átvették a zsidó patriarchalis szisztemetl!..........
:D...P a Véleményterroristák nem tetszik az igazság! Áthúzogatják ! ...:D Tanuljatok valós történelmet NE hazudozzatok tovább ,nagyon negatív karmát hoztok saját fejetekre!...Persze ezek nincsennek is tudatában ,hogy a Karma hogyan is működik?
Interesting title. Attila has fallen so much, that in the next year (452) he conquered Italy and only because of the Pope's begging he was so merciful, that didn't destroyed Roma.
@@AdituLaudisMMXXI depends, what does it mean, that not long after (two years)? Also depends, if someone dies, does it mean, that he has fallen? And even all this doesn't change, that the title is totally fake.
Please explain to me how did the Huns led by Attila reach the gates of Rome the following year, if they were "defeated" in Gaul?? Rome was defenceless, the pope begged Atiila not to destroy the city and what a miracle: Attila listened to the old man and left, w/o any pillaging. The pope was so thankful that called him the "scourge of God". Tell me which is the tactic when I defeat the enemy far away from my capital and then I let it reach my capital city?? Which other "barbarian" army did spare Rome from pillaging?? Did you mention that Aetius was a royal hostage at Buda in the Hunnish court and knew Attila well??
@@wanderlewis8552 there was not found any traces of battle on the Catalunian fields. I'm not an historian or a connaisseur, but I think Aetius and Atilla made an agreement there. Aetius was after all executed later. Was he executed for treason against Rome?
@@alexandrewellingtonvieirad964 I agree with the agreement statement. I did not search Aetius' life afterwards, but his execution could have been the revenge of a rival to the throne. It seems logical that two men like Attila and Aetius who knew each other well from teenagerhood, probably spoke each other's language, would not fight and kill each other. Attila demanded half of the empire on solid grounds given Honoria's wedding ring sent to him. He came to get hold of his possessions.
I will give you anoghter exsamle of strange witbdowal. When Alexander the Great stood before the fortres of Odesos a prossesion of old wait dressed priest went out from the gate and told him do not to breach the law of brotherhood and to whitdrow his troops. Alexander withdrows... Like Attila befor the Pope. Both were Thracians born/bulgarians.
The reason why Aetius could not stop Atilla the following year was because his Germanic mercenaries, the bulk of whom made up his military in this famous battle, could not be mustered quickly enough to help Italy. Remember that most of the Visigothic forces (who made up the crucial cavalry contingent) were from Southern and Western Gaul. They had a reason to defend the first incursion, but not the subsequent attack on Italy. Attila also had the advantage of drawing a large reserve of manpower from Alan, Ostrogoth, Lombard, and other Germanic tribes whom essentially he had held hostage through the Hun's previous conquest. They were obliged to provide him the replaced manpower, while the Romans could not do the same.
It's a strategic stalemate and tactical victory for Attila since the year after the Romans were left with no man power and had to watch the Huns razing their way into Rome until paying them off
Atila nem szenvedett vereséget félre vezető a cím, inkább pont hogy a Rómaiak szenvedtek vereséget hisz elvesztették hadvezérüket , és mikkor Őseink ott voltak a Római légiók elkotrodtak szép csendben .Ráadásul a gyalogosok hátrányban vannak a lovas íjászokkal szemben .
Historically, after remaining a week after the battle both armies in their camps watching each other, Attila's army was the one that initially executed a withdrawal to the Rhine River, in which it was followed at a prudent distance by the Romans and Alans.
The huns stayed the romans left! Theodoric king of Gots has died in the battle ,so Aetius biggest allay left the battle field ...They clearly lost! Where was Aetius next year when the huns took Aquiellia? Where was the roman army? Nowhere! Where was the roman army with Aetius when Atila San-Jü went against Rome? The Pop was runinng to bow and kneeling down front of Atila! We know that ,all this facts are very painful to You! But this is the true!....By the way the alans does not existed after battle of Catalaunum ,before Catalaunum they have tried to resist to Atila, but in a battle 80 thousand of alans has died right there in the battlefield!
Contrary to common belief Huns didn't just vanish but dissolved as a unified entity with Oghur tribes Utigur, Akatziri, Saragur, Onogur, Barsil, Kutrigur, Bulgar, Sabir, all being fractions
The leaders of the coalition were wrong several times. However, the Huns launched a general attack the very next day, at dawn on the second day of June 451. The main forces attacked from the opposite side, the Eastern Goths from the right and the Gepids from the left. The hesitant and confused coalition troops who woke up with the alarm were so surprised that the fate of the battle was decided in just a few hours. Severus's legions were easily scattered and routed by Theodemir's Gothic hurlers Attila's heavy cavalry, consisting of armored javelins and lancers, and the three solid penetrating wedges of the previously unknown "cataphracts" amazed and surprised the Roman center that the light-armored legions were completely powerless against them. The javelins advanced as far as Vetrónius's fighting position, but Atilla ordered them in a different direction because he did not want to risk the life of Aetius. Ardarik's best Gepid mudguard was tasked with capturing Theodoric and his staff. The bulk of the left wing attacked with great force, but at a measured pace, against the Visigoths, who knew Hun tactics well. However, half a concentrated Gyor team, led by the prince of Bajuvár Alaufin, bypassed the city of Tul with a special fighting style and attacked from the side and broke through the Visigothic order. They calculated well that the attack on the eye would distract the commanders. The order of battle, which did not secure his side well enough, was broken through with a single thrust. Given that they were well acquainted with the fighting style of the Visigoths, they reached the tribal positions almost unmolested. In the Battle of Catalnaum, Atilla defeated the coalition armies, went to Rome, where the Pope offered Atilla the keys to Rome, but Atilla did not accept it, he did not want to destroy the city. They also don't know that Atilla saved the Roman Empire several times. The Roman emperor had a bodyguard of Huns.
Hozzá kell tegyük a Pápa megkorononázta Atila-t a magyar Szent-Koronával ,ami neki készült ami-kor született Armeniai Engadi városában 406 körül,ahol Atila Senyő nevelkedett is! ....
Ma sem értem. Ha Attila maradt a csata helyszínén és a rómaiak és szövetségeseik elvonultak, hogyan lehet ezt számukra győzelemnek tekinteni? Egyértelmű Hun győzelem volt, a folytatás a teljes megsemmisülést jelentette volna Aetius számára. Lehet, hogy haztérve éppen a dicsőséges győzelme miatt végezték ki Aetiust? Csak gondolkodom.
Igazad van, de mit kezdjünk azzal a sok százmillió európai és amerikai emberrel akik elhitték és továbbra is el fogják hinni ezeket a hunellenes és magyarellenes narrativákat? Mi olyanok vagyunk mint Don Quijote a szélmalmokkal, egy pár millió magyar a hatalmas indoeurópai nyelvű kultúrákkal és mentalitásokkal szemben!
@@OtaBengaBokongo Ungurii nu sunt slavi, dar nici nu se trag din huni.Ungurii au venit in Europa aproximatix cinci sute de ani mai tarziu.Adevarat din aceleași zone.
My understanding from other sources is that the Romans left the field because Aetius still hoped to one day utilize Hunnic forces for Rome. And of course his troops were exhausted along with the question of the Visigoths staying to finish the fight. Attila on his part was said to have built a large pile of saddles and things to burn himself up if the Roman forces attacked his encampment and it fell. At best I believe it could be called a " draw " . A pity Attila wasn't finished then and there . Italy suffered for it with the attacks later on and it further brought about the fall of the Western Empire . I enjoyed this presentation ! Thank you for it.😊
Az a probléma, hogy Catalaunum illetve Mariacum környékén, bár kutatások folytak, nem találják a nyomait sem egy ilyen volumenű ütközetnek. Viszont írásos nyomai vannak az elmúlt századok történelem hamisitasanak.
@@janicomp Hungary has lost all wars and all battles, and you now use Attila to defame the Romans re-inventing and distorting history. SHAME. Attila was humiliated, this is history. STOP.
Én hallottam olyan előadást amelyben a professor azt mondta hogy nem volt csata.Egy csomó ember meghalt volna értelmetlenül.A másik dolog ha volt ütközet nem a legyőzött szokott helyben maradni hanem a gyöztes.A rómaiak hagyták ott a csatateret.
Minden esetre nem találják az állítólagos csatateret. Igazad van ,nem a legyőzött maradt a csatatéren,hanem a győztes,akkoriban még a győztes feladata volt,az elesettek eltemetése . Még valami fontos,a vizi gótok királya elesett,másnap reggelre a gótok eltüntek,számukra az volt fontos ,hogy ki legyen a királyuk. Aetius amikor látta,hogy kevesen vannak ,visszatért Rómába,ahol meggyilkolták. Győztes Hadvezért ki szoktak végezni? Ha Atilla lett volna a vesztes,milyen Hadsereggel indult volna 452-ben Róma ellen? A hunok reflexijjai sokkal távolabbi hatással rendelkeztek,mint az ellenségé . Ugyan az,vagy hasonló játszódhatot le ,mint Carreránál a Pártusok idején !
харош мультики показывать. эту битву народов описали Францисканские монахи наблюдавшие за ней с холма. против 150 нахов во главе с Атиллой из племени гунов. рим выставил 1 миллион солдат. по 300 тыс от рима от галлов и готтов и через 3 дня за счет числености римский генерал Аврелий хотел их окружить зажав к реке Кельн в германии нынешей это. Атилла угадав его план ночью перевел армию через кельн и захватил крепость позади себя осел там а римская армия не решилась пойти вслед за нахами( Аланы Гунны Викинги Англы варяги это все разные названия одного и того же народа с кавказа. Нахов. ведущих свой род от предка Ноха. ( библейского Ноя .Ноаха) Атилла послал за подмогой на родину вестника и через год к нему прибыло еще 250 тыс Нахов. их в европе знают как 1авар- это переводится как пришел пожить. на время. вот там и был воплощен план Барбаросса. 3 удара в разные точки чтоб не дать Риму как раньше обьединиться в миллионную армию как при Колотуанской битве. к тому же пока атилла был в европе на его родину напали Сарматы и нахам пришлось часть войск отсылать на кавказ чтоб обезопасить родину и генералы Курмих и Басих с сыном Атиллы Динцигом через Азовское море вернулись и истребили акациров-сарматов напавших на аланию а потом совершили поход за каспий и там тоже разогнали их логово и после этого про них никто слышал в мире. на самом деле Атилла и Нахи даже не хотели покорять ни рим ни европу они просто преследовали ост-Готов которые вместе со славянами первые напали на аланию перейдя за реки Тина и Итиль на кавказ 600 тыс войском и когда нахи погнали их со своей земли то славяне спрятались выжившие в полуночных землях на севере а ост-готы бежали к западным готам спастись преследуемые гуном Атилой со 150 тыс армией Нахов-Аланов. вот так они и дошли до запада и рим встал на их пути. но после того как рим нанес серьезный урон нахам то они уже решили поквитаться и с Римом. и так и сделали. потом.
Research will continue in 2024. We HUNGARIANS are a very mixed ethnic group, but current research shows many similarities with the Huns. We are related to the Turks, Uighurs, Huns, Xuanzhuans and many other ethnic groups. I used to say that we are a mixture of many peoples, because we lived a nomadic lifestyle, so it is not surprising that we mixed with many peoples before we arrived in the Carpathian Basin. According to one of the claims, we came from the Uyghurs from today's Ural Mountains or the state of So, which is now China, where the Xuanxuans and the Turks also came from. There are words of Hun origin in our language, for example hitü = faith (in Hungarian, hit). I hope I was able to provide new information. A Hungarian history teacher. And thanks to the site for the great battle scenes!
The magyars never been "nomadic people"! That is a fals propaganda! Neither in their Hun ages ....Nomadic people did not built enormous cites like Tongwangcsen= Fehérvár in Asia neither Etzilburg wich is a german word for Atila"s castle (later called Vetus Buda) in moun-tain of Pilis.Vetus is latin word means "Old"....Yes Hungarians are mixed people like french or british people! Hun-magyars has many scythian tribes like asi-alans called by romans Jazigs =jász! besenyő=pecheneggs,palóc,matyó,pannon,avar,szeklers=székely=hun,etc...They are all huns. with..R1 A genetic code!
I believe there is considerable evidence that Attila’s forces Formed a defensive circle with his baggage train. He was expecting an attack. When it dos not come he retreated. Aetius also withdrew realizing his shaky Visigoth alliance. I see it as a tactical draw but strategic win for Rome. True attlla invaded Italy a year or so latter., knowing he could not attack Gaul again. Italy proved a mistake, it was a soft target,except for the Italian summer and annual disease season. Another strategic loss ensued.
Sajnos ez nem így volt!Johnconnery! Semmiféle védőkör nem kellett! Ön keveri a dolgokat ,az a következő évben volt az elfogult nyugati tudósítás szerint Aquiella ostrománál! Aetius ,ha egyáltalán volt csata elhagyta a csatamezőt, mert a gótok királya meghalt a csatában ,ezért a nagyszámú gót sereg elvonult...Aetius legfőbb szövetségese híjján távozott! Észak Gallia a hunok uralma alá került 53 várost dúltak fel! Miként észak Italia (NEM volt Olaszország! Az majd csak a XIX. században lesz!)is a hunok uralma alá került ,mert elfoglalták Rómáig a pápa maga ment és hódolt be ,térdelt le Atila NagySámán előtt! Semmiféle hiba nem volt Róma hódoltatásában! Mivel Atila Senyő hódóltatta a Pápát! Aki szimbólikusan megadta magát, átadta a város kulcsát! Továbbá nem csak letérdelt Atila előtt, hanem Királlyá is Koronázta! A Hun-magyarok felszámolták a római rabszolgatartó szisztemet! Az szúrta a szemüket! Nekik nem voltak rabszolgáik, mivel megvetették a rabszolgatartást és a rabszol-gatartókat is! Náluk csak szolgák voltak! Rendszerint hadifoglyok ,akik bármikor személyes bátorság vagy egyéb hasznos tudás esetén, bármikor újra szabad emberekké válhattak!
imagine being there seeing this battle in person.... this battle truly molded Europe to what it is today. crazy.. if the huns won history would have been far different
not really! we won all the battles in our European tours, but never conquered any land. The Carpathian Valley is more precious and fruitful than any other country in Europe!
These videos are so cool. Everything you need to see and hear about the battles of the past in stunning visuals and great narration. Some of those shots are the closest things we will prob see to how these battles looked like. Great job I’m looking forward for more!
Increíble el daño que causaban con sus jinetes arqueros, y que pocas tribus e imperios lograron imitarlos al mismo nivel de disparo extra largo. Incredible the damage caused by their mounted archers, and that few tribes and empires were able to imitate at the same level of extra long range shoot.
3. typ.. 1 ..Great-long =türkish-bow 800 meter ...2. Hun-bow medium 600 meter ..3. rapid-bow mongol medium 400-500 meter ....europer arrows 220-300 meter ...
@@gaborbaki6983 , turkish bow on a horse?, and why they didn't conquer half of the world as them?, although some say thah turks are descendents of huns, and them of mongols...
@@Ulises-Gonzalez-3131 göktürk empire...hun empire...mongol empire...et Timur kán-Tamerlan sah= turco-mogollar sultan --turan -lideri ...Türkish bow 120 kg -power , grande radius ..minimal problem horse-expedition...
@@Ulises-Gonzalez-3131... well, you're right, the Turks and the Huns are related. The Mongol ruler Genghis Khan had many Turkish/Hun soldiers in his army. Whether the Huns are descended from the Mongols has not yet been fully clarified, as the opinions of many historians differ. But the languages are very similar ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan ... the Turks had a large empire on three continents that lasted 500 years. Why should the sultans expand their empire to the east? It would have been unwise to control and steer such an empire, as we see with the Huns, Romans and Mongols (the Mongol empire did not last long). If you look closely at the standard of the Turkish president, you will see the sun surrounded by 16 small stars at the top left. The sun represents today's Türkiye, the 16 small stars represent the empire of the Turks in history .. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Seal_of_Turkey here is a link to Göktürks .. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6kt%C3%BCrks
Anglosajón anglosajón anglosajón pero qué siempre pasa con el idioma que aquí se utiliza?😢😢 el anglosajón no 👎 tiene nada de la gracia necesaria para hacer traducciones, en cambio el idioma que aquí se utiliza es completamente válido para hacerse entender mundialmente ❤😊
One year after the battle, the Huns were already at the walls of Rome. This was painted in fresco in the Vatican. Unfortunately, it gives bad knowledge.
Ich habe mir diese Schlacht bereits im kommentarbereich der Schlacht an der Milvinischen Brücke gewünscht. Ich denke nicht das dieses Video auf meinem Wunsch entstanden ist aber trotzdem danke.
Hind sight being 20-20, Attila would have accomplish a decisive defeat on the Romans if he could of further drew him into open territory. As it was Attila stopped and encamped a mile or so into open country. The Romans had their backs to restricted terrain and thus were protected from encirclement. If they had moved further into open territory then the exceptional Hun cavalry would have been able to surround them and cut them to pieces. War is always full of what ifs, but as I said I would have encamped farther away from the Romans and force them to come to him. This would have most surely of happened since the Romans were the ones perusing.
Given the confusion, lack of clear goals, repeated engagements with various allies, etc., most wars seem to me like little more than a harsh and inefficient method of population control.
@janibeg3247 The Western Romans didn't fare any better...A few years after the Catalaunian battle of 451 CE. Aetius was summoned by Emperor Valentinian III to the Imperial Palace in Ravenna to report on financial matters in 454 CE. When Aetius informed about the state of the treasury, suddenly the emperor rose from the throne and began to accuse Aetius of accusations of acting against him. He accused him of losing his throne rights in the Eastern Empire because of him, and now Aetius sought to take power from him in Ravenna. Then the emperor stood up and hit the Roman commander in the head several times on the head, killing him on the spot. Aetius’ comrades shared his fate. The death of Flavius Aetius, baptized as the “the last of the Romans”, definitely meant no chance of rebuilding the Western Roman Empire and led Rome to the abyss. Procopius reports that the emperor, after killing Aetius, was to ask a certain Roman whether he had made the right decision by removing Aetius; he would answer: “Good or bad, I don’t know that, but I know you have cut off your right hand with your left.” The western empire suffered several Gothic invasions and, in AD 455, was sacked by Vandals. Rome continued to decline after that until AD 476 when the western Roman Empire came to an end.
It was so EPIC I enjoyed every minute of it I don't know which battle you're planning to cover next but please consider covering the battle of Anglon 543 It's highly underrated
Stunning representation of the scale of this and such (LARGER ?) engagements. Thwarting Attila made perfect sense if the objective was restoring this territory to Rome- AND the empire would not reach critical mass at home.
@Aditu Laudis, could format videos of older battles, for example, the Battle of Kadesh, between Hittites and Egyptians, the wars between Hazael and Assyria, the Battle of Karkar, involving Israel, Aram and Assyria. Thanks.
I enjoyed the description of the conflict. The Germans referred to it as the 'Hunnenschlachtlied' in which tale annually the spirits of the fallen Germans and Huns arose on the anniversary of the battle and fought once more in the same hilly land. In legend one million men fought that day. Incidentally, I thought the general view was that Attila killed his brother, Breda, for some reason. As for Aetius, I had read that his Roman legionaires were mostly German recruits. He himself might be Germanic, taking a Roman, or Romanized variant when he joined the Roman Army. At any rate the Germanic tribal alliance could certainly use the well-trained Roman legion(s) which Aetius commanded. To add a family-feud-type ingredient, the Goths of the east (Ostrogoths) were vassals of Attila's Huns, paying tribute each year. Part of that relationship might mean contributing troops to an Attila war scheme.
@@lucatampellini9734 If this is factual, it accords well with the historical westward migration: Sacae>Scythians>Germanic tribes. Another line involved the Gauthei>Gothi>Getae>Goths>Gauls. Since they were all found together with the Scythians, many historians believe they originated with the Sacae. There seemed to be a strong link with the Northern Kingdom of Israel, which was taken into bondage and placed in "the land of Goshen, Habor and the Medes." They never returned to Israel. The tribe of Dan seemed to have eluded this bondage by taking to the sea and colonizing southern and western Europe. However, 200,000 of Judah were seized from the northern areas of that kingdom and taken into the Assyrian bondage, along with the Northern Kingdom. This was a massive effort on Assyria's part, as the Northern Kingdom was estimated to be about eleven million people at that time. It is important in tracing these matters to recall that the Hebrew language was typically written without vowels. Thus, for example, the tribe of Dan might leave its colonizing mark as 'Dan,' 'Dun' ('Dunne'), 'Den,' 'Din,' 'Don' etc. The name 'Donnell' might be originally 'Dan El' ('Dan of God, tribe thereof). 'Bogdan' seemed to be another of these traces found in the Balkans. From Greece to Ireland one could find the marks of Dan. If this is true of Dan, it may well be true of others. For example, Juteland, if properly pronounced, would be 'Ju•te' or 'Ju•tah', which accords with the tribe of Judah. Also, Judah was the royal tribe whereto the sceptre had been assigned. It seems many European kings arose in the area. Parenthetically, the Holy Roman Empire of Charlemagne embraced almost the entirety of the Germanic peoples. One might conclude that the Northern Kingdom of Israel had been transferred into Europe where it was reconstituted. Some might see the hand of God in this. Be that as it may, we know from Scripture that the people of the Hebrew covenant were to be called "in Isaac's name" ('Saac' or 'SC'). One of the last kings of Israel was Omri. The Assyrians pronounced the initial part of the name with a 'gh' or 'kh' guttural sound, producing a 'khumri' or 'ghomri.' Scholars conclude that the Cymbri of Wales derived naturally from this. So to, the Cimmerians and Gauthei. After all, in the Hebrew language, 'Omri' might be supplied with our 'e' or 'i' and been pronounced 'Khimri' or something akin. Just in passing, you may recall the story in Scripture of "the coat of many colors." In the Cecil B. DeMille Hollywood rendering, this coat was depicted as a 'rainbow pattern.' However, this was surely all wrong. Referencing the Scythians again, this people migrated to some extent eastward as well as westward. There was discovered in China in modern times a mummy which did not bear the characteristics of the Chinese people anatomically or culturally (dress and accessaries). The mummy had a nordic bone structure and reddish-blonde or brown hair. It was wrapped in a woolen blanket or coat of many colored threads. Hence, one could immediately infer it was similar to the sweaters, blankets, shawls and coats commonly produced in Ireland and Scotland. From this mummy I believe that we can deduce the Scythians-Goths-Germanic people's generally appearance at that time, which was Caucasian and their culture bearing links to Israel, including 'clothing of blends of many colors.' The above, which I linked with the mummy discovery in northeastern China, may be thin, I'll admit, but its seemed consistent with the great migration of the Sacae-Scythian-Goth-Germanic people into Eurasia and, thereafter, into central and western Europe. Also, I am careful not to speak loosely regarding 'Hebrew' and 'Israel.'
This video presents the events surrounding the Battle of Catalonia in a completely implausible and contrary to historical truth, something that has been done for several centuries. Attila was the emperor of the Hon-Bulgarian Empire. Aetius, Attila's uncle was appointed governor of Bai Galij (Gallia), which at that time was already a vassal country of Hon-Bulgar. The Hon-Bulgarians are not mercenaries, but masters of these lands, their allies are the fraternal tribes of the Burgundians and Faranagi (Franks), speaking the Thriok/Thracian/Tiurko-Bulgarian language. This is evident from the names of Lutetia (Leutheish - City of the Dragon), Paris (from Barrage - Dragon), Seine from Su-eni (Great River), Toulouse (Toulus - Capital City), etc. But falling under the influence of the Talmudists, taught to become an independent ruler of the whole of Gaul, Haiji Yauchi (Aetius) decided with the help of the Alans, the Visigoths and their leader Theodoric to raise a riot against his master and nephew Attila. The so-called Catalunya field was not called that before the battle, it was called Chulem, and on its summit there was a Tengri shrine of the god of herbivores Saban Thriok, from whose name the name of Champagne arose in the future. After the battle on June 21-22, 451, due to the fact that the most Visigoths and Ostrogoths of the two warring armies died there, this field was called "Hud Alan" ("Gothic field" in Thracian-Bulgarian language), which phonetically changes among the local Franks, Burgundians and Celts (Gauls), it took the form of the Catalan field. Attila emerges victorious from the battle. And this is evident in his subsequent campaign in Italy in 452. There he captured Ak avil (White Fortress, Aquileia), destroyed it and forced its population to move to the nearby islands in the sea, so as not to execute them on land according to Bulgarian law. There they built the city of Benedict, today called Venice. The city was built with the help of Bulgarian builders in the sea with millions of wooden supports from larch trees that grow only in Bulgarian Siberia. How were these millions of trees transported from Siberia 4000 km away. from Venice, let Western historiography explain it without lying. How would this city have looked if Attila had been defeated??!
Attila is still alive, in the person of the Chuvash people (Suvars) they have preserved their language, but he is dying, his name is translated as father, father of peoples
Nicely done, but one mention about the visual effects on battle map. Why there are no differences between different types of units, archers, light/heavy infantry and cavalry, romans and their allies? At least minimum differences should be. In rest gj!!
There is only one question: after the battle who owns the battlefield? In this case these were the Huns and not the Romans. The Romans left the battlefield that is: they left their deads and woundeds together with their assets, treasuries etc there for the Huns. At that time - later on too, even to our present days - it is important for an army to take care for the dead, and woundeds of theirs and not to leave them for the will and mercy of the enemy. So no doubt: the winner was Attila and also were the Huns!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well , to me, that's a new version of History here. The Franks played a role on Aetius side. You describe them mostly as ennemies.. Never heard that before. Knowing the benefit the Franks got from the output of this battle I am surprised by this new version.
It's a modern Anglo-Saxon version of the story, with the Franks never being well presented on principle (just like the French in the movie "Dunkirk"). As history is not a science ..; moreover, historically, the location of the Catalan fields is arbitrary. And these are not Romans, but Gallo-Romans. Moreover, the francs could naturally be more easily qualified as Belgians ("Gauls"), than as Germans. It's just a question of point of view, given the concrete lack of material for the origin of the francs (which means 'free'; I don't think there was only one free tribe in the Germans ..; and men released from the Roman yoke would have much more reason to call themselves "free men" - in the emancipated sense, It makes more sense from an anthropological point of view ).
Before the Battle of Catalonia, the Huns had already driven the Romans out of Pannonia. As early as 387, Rome surrendered to the Huns to Attila's father, Bendegúz. Both Rome and Constantinople paid taxes to the Huns.
istvanhuni! -Ennek a pár leírt sornak,maradtak,tárgyi,feltáratlan emlékei,itt a föld alatt.A Polgármester úr betiltotta, az Atila fürdője,vagy Atila temetkezése,stb részletes vizsgálatát.
Great video as always! As a follow-up to this battle, please do a video on the Sack of Aquileia (452 C.E.), where Attila gets his revenge on Aetius by razing the city of Aquileia (considered to be the Venice of the Roman Empire before Venice was established as a city), and causing a massive famine to break out in the Italian peninsula due to his plundering of northern Italy. You should also do more non-historical battles, such as the Ostrogoths vs. the Jutes for Total War: Attila, Odrysian Kingdom vs. Massilia for Total War: Rome II, Otomo vs. Hattori for Total War: Shogun 2, and Zheng Jiang/Tai Bandits vs. Sun Jian/Wu for Total War: Three Kingdoms.
Yeah, too many people see this battle as a roman victory over the huns when in reality it was a last ditch effort to survive that ultimately didn't stop the huns from doing what they wanted. This battle delayed the huns, but attila came back later.
- Valami nincs rendben! A másik videó határozottan állítja,hogy Atila 452-ben meghalt. Eltemették. Erre később olyan választ kaptam,hogy 455-ben halt meg! A kitett videó,igaz legyen! Atila 62 évesen halt meg?
Appreciate your efforts but PLEASE factor in narrator audio vs sound effects (as good as they are). Tweak down the effects a little so we can understand better.
From the Hungarian side it was the fall of the Roman Empire. After one week of bloody battle in constant rain, the loss was tremendous on both sides. The gothic ally of the romans lost their king and they left the battlefield. Next morning no Army was standing against each other. There were three days waiting on the battlefield without fight and Atilla started to retreat as the Romans did the same. This is all fiction in the video!
I dont think this battle was the knockout-blow it used to be seen as. Aetius didnt risk a pursuit. Atilla was still able to invade Italy the following year.
Great video. The picture of Attila appears to very appropriate, since the Huns had been in Europe for several generations and no doubt did a little mixing with the natives.
Not at all. According to the contemporary Roman historian Priscus, Attila as well as the Huns had a typical north east asian look. The Huns consisted of two groups, the ruling class and the ruled. The ruling class was small numbers of those east asian hordes such as Mongol, Manchu, Xianbei or Xiongnu (FYI. there were so many bigger or smaller east asian nomad nations throughout central and north east asia)while the ruled were the people who were gradually annexed by the Huns on the way to the west. The history says that the Romans didn't know where the Huns came from and this give us very important clue. If they were from Turkey or somewhere near, Romans could write so. There were nothing mysterious about the huns in that case. It is really funny that the western historians are trying their absolute best to ignore the record from Priscus, one of the most important and reliable sources regarding the huns as well as attila, and people still think Attila was some sort of middle eastern lol. Do you guys feel shame or get your ego hurt if you guys were conquered and destoryed twice by the North East Asians? I wonder. Is that the reason? In short, were the huns Turkish? No, turkish people were one of those who ruled by the huns. were they inflused by the huns? Yes the turkish were culturally influenced by the huns so they still have some east asian heritages but that's all about it. You know, Vietnamese were ruled by French for a while and they were culturally influenced by French, however that doesnt make the French or Joan d'arc as their ancestor, nor have French Vietnamese look but why portray Atiila as caucaisan? Is that some sort of joke?
@@AdituLaudisMMXXI The only probem here is : The huns von this batle because the romans diapeared overnight, therefore the huns did not find the in the early morning. LOOK AFTER THE RIGHT HISTORY. Attila lost the batle = Tis is hapened the other way around.!
@@AdituLaudisMMXXI харош мультики показывать. эту битву народов описали Францисканские монахи наблюдавшие за ней с холма. против 150 нахов во главе с Атиллой из племени гунов. рим выставил 1 миллион солдат. по 300 тыс от рима от галлов и готтов и через 3 дня за счет числености римский генерал Аврелий хотел их окружить зажав к реке Кельн в германии нынешей это. Атилла угадав его план ночью перевел армию через кельн и захватил крепость позади себя осел там а римская армия не решилась пойти вслед за нахами( Аланы Гунны Викинги Англы варяги это все разные названия одного и того же народа с кавказа. Нахов. ведущих свой род от предка Ноха. ( библейского Ноя .Ноаха) Атилла послал за подмогой на родину вестника и через год к нему прибыло еще 250 тыс Нахов. их в европе знают как 1авар- это переводится как пришел пожить. на время. вот там и был воплощен план Барбаросса. 3 удара в разные точки чтоб не дать Риму как раньше обьединиться в миллионную армию как при Колотуанской битве. к тому же пока атилла был в европе на его родину напали Сарматы и нахам пришлось часть войск отсылать на кавказ чтоб обезопасить родину и генералы Курмих и Басих с сыном Атиллы Динцигом через Азовское море вернулись и истребили акациров-сарматов напавших на аланию а потом совершили поход за каспий и там тоже разогнали их логово и после этого про них никто слышал в мире. на самом деле Атилла и Нахи даже не хотели покорять ни рим ни европу они просто преследовали ост-Готов которые вместе со славянами первые напали на аланию перейдя за реки Тина и Итиль на кавказ 600 тыс войском и когда нахи погнали их со своей земли то славяне спрятались выжившие в полуночных землях на севере а ост-готы бежали к западным готам спастись преследуемые гуном Атилой со 150 тыс армией Нахов-Аланов. вот так они и дошли до запада и рим встал на их пути. но после того как рим нанес серьезный урон нахам то они уже решили поквитаться и с Римом. и так и сделали. потом.
While its true that there was some controversy about the origin of the Huns, the consensus after recent decades is that they were Turks of Oghuric affiliation, mostly based on credible studies confirming that the vast majority of attested Hunnic names, as well as all Hunnic successor clans are of evident Oghur Turkic origin. All Hunnic tribes (entirely Oghur Turkic) : Akatziri, Onogurs, Utigurs, Sabirs, Bulgars, Saragurs, Kutrigurs, Barsils, Balanjars Recorded Hunnic names of Turkic origin : Aigan = moon prince; from Turkic aï & can Alp Ilutuer / Ilteber = heroic chieftain; from Turkic alp & iltäbär Althias = six; from Turkic Alti Akkagas = white rock; from Turkic ak & kayač Atakam = elder shaman; from Turkic ata & kam Balach = calf; from Turkic Malaq Berik = strong; from Turkic Berık Basik = governor; from Turkic Bârsiğ Bleda = wise; from Turkic Bildä Bochas = either gullet; from Turkic Boğuz; or bull, from Buqa Dengizich = ocean-like, heavenly; from Turkic teɲez & dêɲri; or, more simply, great lake Donat / Donatu = horse; from Turkic Yonat Edeco = good; from Turkic Ädgü Ellac = to rule; from Turkic el & lä Emmedzur = horse lord; from Turkic Ämäcur Eskam / Esqam = companion of the shaman; from Turkic Eŝkam Hereka / Kreka = pure princess; from Turkic Arïqan Ernakh / Hernac = small man, heroic man; from Turkic Ernäk Iliger = prince man; from Turkic ilig & är Karadach = black mountain; from Turkic Qaradağ Karaton = black cloak; from Turkic Qarâton Kursik = either noble; from Turkic Kürsiğ; or belt-bearer, from Qurŝiq Kutilzis = blessed herald; from Turkic kut & elči Mundzuk = bead; from Turkic Munčuq Oebarsius / Aybars = moon leopard, from Turkic Aïbârs; or dun leopard, from oy & bars Oldogan / Odolgan = either red falcon; from Turkic al & dogan; or chubby, from Tolgun Oktar / Uptar = brave; from Turkic Öctär Ruga / Rua = wise man; from Turkic Ögä Turgun = still/calm; from Turkic Turkun Uldin = six; from Turkic Alti Zolban = shepherd star; from Turkic Čolpan.
i'm shocked, another turk claiming somebody else was a turk, they were not turks, they came from the Xiongnu Empire. They were not Turks, any credible unbiased source will tell you that they were NOT.
@@latakicsi2183 idiots -dzsukell... Hun langue ..old-türk...old-bolgar....Hun armada 60% türk-oguz ....et 20% mongol et 20% tunguz-mandzu/kushan-kusu- bird totem/... sztyeppe-riders unió
Growing up in Belgium that battle still resonates to this day, people are quite aware that had the Huns won Europe would be a very different place today...The strange thing though is that nobody knows where these legendary Catalaunian plains are in France..
It was very problematical to follow the events on the "reference map" as all the units from both sides appearing on it where misrepresented as infantry ("X") as some were actually cavalry ("/"). Distinguishing between the cavalry units and the infantry units and where they were located relative to each other by using the appropriate icons would have helped explain better how this battle unfolded.
@@nikolaykolev1438 Actually, in the game of chess, we call that a draw. Had the Huns won the battle outright, European history would have been different.
This is the era of the myth/legend Niebelungeleid. It arose out of the betrayals that led to the alliance of the Franks with the Huns. The Fritz Lang 1924 silent film, Die Nibelungen captures some of the elements of what might be a far echo of something that happened in reality but was never recorded by a chronicler. at the time. It's worth the time to experience the mood of it as something that remained in the German subconscious up to the time of the film at least.
Doesn't a solid wedge cav charge only bottleneck your own cav and run them into their own horses. A hollow or mostly hollow edge shape would be much better
Ha Aetius győzött volna akkor egy évvel később, Atilla - nem jutott volna úgy rómáig , mint kés - a vajban... - úgy hogy Rómába ... be sem kellett mennie ..... ! Róma kegyelmet kért, és kapott - Atillától.... ! :)
Bizonyos - adó terhe mellett ! ..... ! Kegyelmet gyakorolt..... ! * Róma püspöke...fogadta ..... "Kiméld meg ezt a várost... ...őseink, apostolaink csontjai nyugszanak itt " ! ..... *
Atilla achieved his goal. The Visigoth king Theodoric fell, and the Visigoths, Bugunds, and Geman allies fled during the night after the battle, so Atilla returned to Hungary. Aetius' battered legionary infantry would have had no chance of successfully confronting Attila's horse-archers. His most capable corps was formed by the Visigothic cavalry, organized in the Hun style, who left him alone. He had no choice but to admit the futility of continuing the battle and withdrew. You don't need to be a military expert to understand what happened and who won. According to this, the superiority of the Huns at the end of the battles compared to the strength of the opponent was not three to one, but rather five to one. We do not know of another example of Atilla's self-restraint in history. What kind of attraction and calculation could have led the great king of the Huns to retreat? Writes the Frenchman Eric Deschodt in his 2006 work analyzing Atilla's reign and military actions with exceptional objectivity and expertise. Atilla spared Aetius' life because he would fall in the event of a collision. This was the reason for Atilla's restraint!
En kaliteli kanallardan birisiniz tebrik ediyorum emeğinize sağlık. Verdiğiniz mesajlardan bizimde ülke olarak almamız gerekenler var. Alabilen almıştır eminim. Ne diyelim anlayana sivrisinek saz..
Katalan es katalunya nem ugyan az!! A csata ugy dolt el, hogy a burgundok penzert ,aetiusz tol, elarultak a hunokat. Apropo! A burgundok is nomad nep ,csak korabban jottek europaba.....
Én úgy tudtam,hogy egy nagyon durva pestis járvány tört ki,amely mindkét hadat megtizedelte.Tulajdonképpen úgymond "győztes" egyikük sem lett.Jelentosen kozrejátszott mindket birodalom bukásában.Gardonyi Géza, "A láthatatlan ember"c. regényében gyönyörűen ír errol a csatarol.Nagyon jó a film!
Gárdonyi műve költői és szép. De Attila serege maradt ott a csatatéren, a másik elment - menekült. Az marad, aki győz. Ez logikus. Aetiust később kivégezték. Ez volt a jutalom a győzelemért?
Because the Huns managed to eliminate the king of their rivals and, most importantly, they had possession of the battlefield after the end of the battle, the outcome was likely a Hun victory., Hyun Jin Kim (2013). The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe. Cambridge University Press. pp. 76-77
How ironic it is that the westerners are still scarced by Attila after 1500 years?!?!? Attila's empire survived in the Hungarian Kingdom for centuries - while the Roman Empire collapsed in 476. And Hungary is still in the middle of Europe. And still shows the only right way to the West in nowdays too!!!
Ce que je trouve étonnant dans ce récit , c'est que l'on m'a appris que les francs faisaient partie de la coalition avec les romains ,et que Aetius était gallo-romain.
Incorrect analysis. The battle was won by Rome and its allies, so much so that Attila retreated to his camp and had a wooden pyre built to commit suicide and avoid being captured by the subsequent Roman attack. Except that Ezio let him escape with his men for political, strategic or otherwise unclear reasons today. He probably did not trust some of his allies, who in battle could join the Huns by betraying.
The Huns disappeared in Central Asia however in parts of Germany and France there are villages where the Huns have left their mark i.e. people who supposedly have Hun traits and appearances. In Hungary the given name Attila appears. It was during the 5thCentury CE that the Romans could no longer protect Britain and pulled out leaving the Britons to their own devices.
When we say the name of Balambér's Hun grand prince or king (rex Hunnorum), we are immediately met with the statement that we know almost nothing about him and that his name is the only one left to us from the pen of the Gothic historian Jordanes (? - 553). They do not even mention the reports from Amminaus Marcelinus, or the data of the Chinese Vei su Chinese chronicle, or the descriptions of the Djagfar Tarihi, and I could list more. It is as if the excellent Hun Grand Duke had been written out of history. The meaning of Balambér's name is derived from the Germanic name Baldemar instead of Bulyar-Bulumar. Ámbátor could be called Baldemár (bold) in their own language, but the Turkish word Bulyar means "of more blood". The Djagfar Tarihi describes his father as Djilka (? - 363), his mother a Sarmatian princess called Vadamerca, so he was born in a mixed marriage "of several bloods". They describe the names of his ancestors and descendants and we can't even be surprised to find the names of Atilla, Ügyek, Álmos or even Árpád on the family tree. Together with his father, Balambér conquers the Arsacid diastina of the Alans and its people, and after his father's death, he invades the empire of the Eastern Goths and destroys the army of King Ermanrik. The Huns make the direct descendant of the king who fell in battle, Hunimund (an interesting name!), the lord of the conquered Eastern Goths, while the rebels continue to fight with the counter-king Vithimir. Not long after, in the spring of 375, Vithimir falls in a bloody battle, the remaining part of his army surrenders or flees with the loss of his head among the Western Goths. Athanarich, the king of the Western Goths, thought he could resist the Huns, but he was wrong, and in the end he himself had to flee. Some of the Western and Eastern Goths asked for admission to the Eastern Roman Empire, while the rest of the Goths surrendered to the weapons of the Balambéres. Within a short time (in 377), an internal conflict developed between the Romans and the Goths, and to their greatest surprise, the Goths called the Huns to help themselves.
Atilla's calculations worked. The falcon statue, the gate and the huge bonfire strengthened the Huns and their allies and weakened the opponents. When Atilla reached the battle line of the Gepid left wing with his archer bodyguards, he immediately saw that the blood-drunk Gepids and their Germanic allies were slaughtering the helpless legionnaires to the last man. He was relieved. , when it was reported that Aetius was alive. The deathly silence after the noise of battle was broken by the thunderous shouts of triumph from the victory-drunk Hun and allied fighters. Victory, victory! Blessings Atilla! Blessings Atilla! To this day, the majority of Western and Hungarian historians describe the Battle of Catalunya primarily based on Jordanes' chronicle, The History of the Goths. The chronicle was written by the Gothic bishop of Ravenna a century after the battle, and in his biased writing he clearly wanted to present the Goths and the Romans in a favorable light. Thus, we must significantly revise the clash that took place on the battlefield of Catalanaum on July 5, 451. According to this, at the end of the battles, the superiority of the Huns compared to the strength of the enemy was not three to one, but rather five to one! The Hun camp was swimming in happiness. And the surviving warriors of the opponent thought with dread of the next day's battle, which would bring their complete annihilation. It was reported to Aetius that after the Alans, the Gallic Zealots and the Franks, the Visigoths had also failed him! If Attila attacks again, he will easily finish us off, said Aetius. He watched intently in the direction of the Hun camp behind the falcon hill. However, no battle preparations were heard there. A Hun horn sounded, signaling an embassy. Three eagle hunters arrived. Aetius immediately received them. The envoy handed over a letter in which Atilla had a short runic message: "May the blessing of Üstengri be upon you. We will meet in Rome next year." Later I will tell you about what happened in Rome!
Almost......Jordanes unvalid,hated huns and Atila Sanyjü......and lived 150 years later,than him.Priscos was valid,visited Atila more than once at his summer wooden palace.......
Seems to me a hun-biased version. Well, I was not there, but reported is, that Attila finally retreated ,not actually in a rout but a retreat it was. And a retreat ist not a a victory . The battle broke the hun`s reputation of being undefeatable, so it did.
- 452 vagy 453 Atila halála.(Most nem írom ide,hogyan halt meg Atila.) Nem csatában esett el! A következő években Atila,egy fa szarkofágban,a temetkezési kamrájában,(A mai Áruház Busz parkoló alatt pihent.) - Tisztelt ellhunoatila nem godolja komolyan,hogy halott Atila csatázni járt? Valami nincs rendben az egész ide kitett videóval? A videóban minden fordítva van,mint ahogyan történt...-Na mind 1! megnéztem!
@@balibambosz333 A videó az események tipikus római változatán alapul. Kár, hogy a hunok nem hagytak írásokat. Úgy gondolom, hogy a csata technikai döntetlen és taktikai visszalépés volt. Róma annyira megtépázott, hogy a következő évben már nem tudta megvédeni Itáliát Attila támadásától, így a katalóniai csatát a hunok győzelme jelentette.
@@elhunoatila1 - A leírásnál,fordításnál,úgy lehet olvasni,hogy a Gótok Királyát a lovak halálra taposták..(Éjjel sötétben leesett a lóról) Később megtalálták,de már halott volt... Valami más is történt,mert a Gótok elvonultak új királyt választani...Vagy összevesztek a rómaiakkal? Aecio római hadvezér,éjjel menekülés közben a hunok táborába tévedt.A hunok nem bántották, az hitték tárgyalni jött...(Korábban Aeciot a hunok is nevelték...) A hunok ismerték,és Ő is ismerte, a hun szokásokat...A történészek vitatkoznak,hogy volt csata? Vagy nem történt meg?Furcsa feljegyzés,hogy a hunok a csatatéren maradnak..."Farkasként üvöltenek,"(Idéztem), dobolnak,és vonyítanak."Néha lóra kapnak,és kilovagolnak...Keresték az ellenséget...(Ezt külön is megkérdeztük az előadótól,hogy mit jelent? ) Miért dobolnak,miért vonyítanak? Ha nem volt csata,nem lehet döntetlen...A csata előtt az ellenfél,rómaiak,és a Gótok is lelépett:...A Hunok még 3 napig maradtak...Várták a felvonuló ellenséget...De az nem történt meg...Kettes változat. Éjjel volt a csata! A Hunok szerettek éjjel,vagy Hajnalban csatázni...A hatalmas zavar, ,keveredés, az ellenfél táborában, a Hunok támadása idézte elő,hogy a lovak eltaposták a Gótok Királyát...A rómaiak jól látták,hogy a Gótok nélkül,számukra,megsemmisítő vereség várható. A Gótok bizonytalan szereplése,talán ,már a csata ,vagy a felvonulás után,Ők is azt gondolták,a római vezér, a Hunokkal tárgyal. Atila 452 vagy 453 körül halt meg...Nem engedték,hogy a megtalált temetkezését,közelről vizsgáljuk...Halott vezér,(Beteg vezér,) Nem csatázik...A vesztes csata után a Hunok,nem vezettek volna a következő évben nagyszabású hadjáratot Atila vezetésével Itáliába...Az évszámok is hibás lehet...De a teljes,gondos ,vizsgálatot,a megtalált tárgyakon,betiltották...Atila fürdőjére, mindenre,a Polgármester úr,két nagy dupla vas rácsot,két nagy vas láncot,és két hatalmas lakatot tett! Ha erre jár,távolról megnézheti...Ez van! Tilos az eseményeket,közelről vizsgálni!
There were also Franks under their Prince Merovee present in the army of the Romans. The Huns allies included the Thuringians. Merovee was a protegee of Aetius.
Without the Goths the Roman’s wouldn’t have stood a chance at all. The Goths were direct descendants of the Scythians, the original horse lords of the steppe, and they knew how to fight the Huns
Ave Milites! I am back! Make sure to support the channel by liking and commenting. Get notified by subscribing and pushing the notification bell. You can support the channel by checking our partner spqrshop.com/ref/Aditu-Laudis/ and purchasing something cool for yourself or a friend. See you in the next one!
These were the times where the romans used the phalanx which they learned from the Greeks. Specifically for these types of enemies.
Attila is often lied to by Western historians because it annoys them that he beat them to shit, especially slapping the Romans in the ass as they fled. But they forget that it was with the disintegration of the Roman Empire that the formation of independent nations began.
The Huns are still the toughest people in Europe. No one could destroy them. They have their own unique ancient language, some that no one understands, and strangers find it very difficult to learn. Their culture and folk art date back to the Scythians.
Great editing and feature as per usual 👍 Total War is still the best strategy game out there
@@izidorkohn1908 But Scythians weren't Turkic people
Sure they were mixed with Huns during the 4th or 5th century AD but their origin was Iranian or Indo European
It's even mentioned they spoke in Iranian languages
Az Attila-film és brutális szövege különösen, köszönő viszonyban nincs a történelmi tényekkel! Hazugság, szemtelen a javából!
Mit vár tóle ? Gagyi nyugati maszlag.Nyugatnak halvány fogalma sincs a történelemről csak a hazudozáshoz értenek.
Y porqué hay que traducir al anglosajón?😢 el anglosajón no tiene nada de la gracia necesaria para hacer traducciones, en cambio el idioma que aquí se utiliza es completamente válido para hacerse entender mundialmente ❤😊
A nyugatiak már csak ilyenek! Össze -vissza hazudoznak! Ha Atila vesztett Catalaunum-nál ,akkor hogy lehet ,hogy Aetius eltűnt a csatamezőről ,mert a gótok királyuk elvesztése után elvonultak a csatatérről?Meggyengítve a római hadat! és HOL volt Aetius a következő évben Aquiella ostromakor? és Hol volt a sereg? és akkor amikor Ravenna elfoglalása után Róma ellen vonult? Hol volt Aetius és az állítólagos római had??Amúgy, a franciák felásták az egész Catalaunumi síkot és SEMMIT sem találtak, nemhogy egy törött kardot ,de még egy sisakot vagy legalább egy fésűt sem! Semmit sem találtak! Tehát ,ha volt csata az nem Catalaunum- nál volt! Amúgy Atila elfoglalta egész észak Franciaországot és a térképük is hamis itt! Mivel egyértelműen felsorolják címei között a "dánok és médek királya" Sőt dél Skandináviát (Svéd-ország) is elfoglaltákl! Média pedig délen van Észak-Perzsiában. Továbbá tudjuk ,hogy a teljes Közép-Ázsia is az uralma alá tartozott...19 évnyi uralkodása alatt kétszer is visszatért oda "Nagy haddal"rendet rakni!....Hazugságokra tanítják a nyugatiakat, a nagy magyar gyűlöletük is részben ennek köszönhető! Nameg a NagyBoldogasszony kultuszunknak ,mivel a magya-rok mindig is matriarchatusban éltek,még sziszteműk is matriarchális volt!Szemben az ösz-szes európai néppel ,akik átvették a zsidó patriarchalis szisztemetl!..........
:D...P a Véleményterroristák nem tetszik az igazság! Áthúzogatják ! ...:D Tanuljatok valós történelmet NE hazudozzatok tovább ,nagyon negatív karmát hoztok saját fejetekre!...Persze ezek nincsennek is tudatában ,hogy a Karma hogyan is működik?
Az egész egy gyalázatos Holy Woodoo hakni!
Spiace, una grande inesattezza! Ma Attila si fermò prima di arrivare a Roma grazie all'incontro con Sua Santita Papa Leone I
Interesting title. Attila has fallen so much, that in the next year (452) he conquered Italy and only because of the Pope's begging he was so merciful, that didn't destroyed Roma.
He died not to long after, watch the entire video
@@AdituLaudisMMXXI depends, what does it mean, that not long after (two years)? Also depends, if someone dies, does it mean, that he has fallen? And even all this doesn't change, that the title is totally fake.
Please explain to me how did the Huns led by Attila reach the gates of Rome the following year, if they were "defeated" in Gaul?? Rome was defenceless, the pope begged Atiila not to destroy the city and what a miracle: Attila listened to the old man and left, w/o any pillaging. The pope was so thankful that called him the "scourge of God". Tell me which is the tactic when I defeat the enemy far away from my capital and then I let it reach my capital city?? Which other "barbarian" army did spare Rome from pillaging?? Did you mention that Aetius was a royal hostage at Buda in the Hunnish court and knew Attila well??
@@wanderlewis8552 there was not found any traces of battle on the Catalunian fields. I'm not an historian or a connaisseur, but I think Aetius and Atilla made an agreement there. Aetius was after all executed later. Was he executed for treason against Rome?
@@alexandrewellingtonvieirad964 I agree with the agreement statement. I did not search Aetius' life afterwards, but his execution could have been the revenge of a rival to the throne. It seems logical that two men like Attila and Aetius who knew each other well from teenagerhood, probably spoke each other's language, would not fight and kill each other. Attila demanded half of the empire on solid grounds given Honoria's wedding ring sent to him. He came to get hold of his possessions.
I will give you anoghter exsamle of strange witbdowal.
When Alexander the Great stood before the fortres of Odesos a prossesion of old wait dressed priest went out from the gate and told him do not to breach the law of brotherhood and to whitdrow his troops.
Alexander withdrows...
Like Attila befor the Pope. Both were Thracians born/bulgarians.
@@luben3045 Attila was "hun born".His capital was in Hungary...
The reason why Aetius could not stop Atilla the following year was because his Germanic mercenaries, the bulk of whom made up his military in this famous battle, could not be mustered quickly enough to help Italy. Remember that most of the Visigothic forces (who made up the crucial cavalry contingent) were from Southern and Western Gaul. They had a reason to defend the first incursion, but not the subsequent attack on Italy.
Attila also had the advantage of drawing a large reserve of manpower from Alan, Ostrogoth, Lombard, and other Germanic tribes whom essentially he had held hostage through the Hun's previous conquest. They were obliged to provide him the replaced manpower, while the Romans could not do the same.
It's a strategic stalemate and tactical victory for Attila since the year after the Romans were left with no man power and had to watch the Huns razing their way into Rome until paying them off
Desicive Hun victory.
The Romans already lacked man power way before the invasion of the Huns. Like the video says, they rely on mercenaries.
Atila nem szenvedett vereséget félre vezető a cím, inkább pont hogy a Rómaiak szenvedtek vereséget hisz elvesztették hadvezérüket , és mikkor Őseink ott voltak a Római légiók elkotrodtak szép csendben .Ráadásul a gyalogosok hátrányban vannak a lovas íjászokkal szemben .
Hun army 700 000 rider ..mandzsuria to -hindiztan-kaukazus hill-europe ..5 hun empire ....europe hun 150 000 rider
Both sides had paid Allies
Historically, after remaining a week after the battle both armies in their camps watching each other, Attila's army was the one that initially executed a withdrawal to the Rhine River, in which it was followed at a prudent distance by the Romans and Alans.
I think it was more of a stalemate than it is a victory for either side.
😆😆😆
All Alans was slutered by Attila's troops , they was the first , because they betreadet him ! Attila's had large Alans troops to ! Etc...
The huns stayed the romans left! Theodoric king of Gots has died in the battle ,so Aetius biggest allay left the battle field ...They clearly lost! Where was Aetius next year when the huns took Aquiellia? Where was the roman army? Nowhere! Where was the roman army with Aetius when Atila San-Jü went against Rome? The Pop was runinng to bow and kneeling down front of Atila! We know that ,all this facts are very painful to You! But this is the true!....By the way the alans does not existed after battle of Catalaunum ,before Catalaunum they have tried to resist to Atila, but in a battle 80 thousand of alans has died right there in the battlefield!
@@timothylee2772 Romans lost!
Contrary to common belief Huns didn't just vanish but dissolved as a unified entity with Oghur tribes Utigur, Akatziri, Saragur, Onogur, Barsil, Kutrigur, Bulgar, Sabir, all being fractions
yes 2010 .......Hun people 810 million ...hun-blood-genetic R1a1-J2
Yes, but that is the way of most empires that fall.
بیا سرشو بخور بابا
It's also thought by many linguists that some of Atilla's hoard settled in the Pyrenees and evolved into the Basques.
KOSZONOM....
The leaders of the coalition were wrong several times. However, the Huns launched a general attack the very next day, at dawn on the second day of June 451. The main forces attacked from the opposite side, the Eastern Goths from the right and the Gepids from the left. The hesitant and confused coalition troops who woke up with the alarm were so surprised that the fate of the battle was decided in just a few hours. Severus's legions were easily scattered and routed by Theodemir's Gothic hurlers
Attila's heavy cavalry, consisting of armored javelins and lancers, and the three solid penetrating wedges of the previously unknown "cataphracts" amazed and surprised the Roman center that the light-armored legions were completely powerless against them. The javelins advanced as far as Vetrónius's fighting position, but Atilla ordered them in a different direction because he did not want to risk the life of Aetius.
Ardarik's best Gepid mudguard was tasked with capturing Theodoric and his staff. The bulk of the left wing attacked with great force, but at a measured pace, against the Visigoths, who knew Hun tactics well. However, half a concentrated Gyor team, led by the prince of Bajuvár Alaufin, bypassed the city of Tul with a special fighting style and attacked from the side and broke through the Visigothic order. They calculated well that the attack on the eye would distract the commanders. The order of battle, which did not secure his side well enough, was broken through with a single thrust. Given that they were well acquainted with the fighting style of the Visigoths, they reached the tribal positions almost unmolested. In the Battle of Catalnaum, Atilla defeated the coalition armies, went to Rome, where the Pope offered Atilla the keys to Rome, but Atilla did not accept it, he did not want to destroy the city. They also don't know that Atilla saved the Roman Empire several times. The Roman emperor had a bodyguard of Huns.
Köszi, hogy tudsz angolul! Honnan tudod ilyen részletesen az eseményeket?
Hozzá kell tegyük a Pápa megkorononázta Atila-t a magyar Szent-Koronával ,ami neki készült ami-kor született Armeniai Engadi városában 406 körül,ahol Atila Senyő nevelkedett is! ....
Ma sem értem. Ha Attila maradt a csata helyszínén és a rómaiak és szövetségeseik elvonultak, hogyan lehet ezt számukra győzelemnek tekinteni? Egyértelmű Hun győzelem volt, a folytatás a teljes megsemmisülést jelentette volna Aetius számára. Lehet, hogy haztérve éppen a dicsőséges győzelme miatt végezték ki Aetiust? Csak gondolkodom.
Igazad van, de mit kezdjünk azzal a sok százmillió európai és amerikai emberrel akik elhitték és továbbra is el fogják hinni ezeket a hunellenes és magyarellenes narrativákat?
Mi olyanok vagyunk mint Don Quijote a szélmalmokkal, egy pár millió magyar a hatalmas indoeurópai nyelvű kultúrákkal és mentalitásokkal szemben!
Egyetértek, én is ezt írtam a kretén nyugatiaknak angolul.
@@dr.d.j.laszloHungarians are Slavs, not Huns Grow up
@@OtaBengaBokongo
Ungurii nu sunt slavi, dar nici nu se trag din huni.Ungurii au venit in Europa aproximatix cinci sute de ani mai tarziu.Adevarat din aceleași zone.
@@OtaBengaBokongoВЕНГРЫ НЕ СЛАВЯНЕ!!!!! ВЕНГРЫ НЕ ГУННЫ!!!!!! ВЕНГРЫ ФИННО-УГОРСКИЕ ПЛЕМЕНА!!!!!!!!! А вы все БАРАНЫ!!!!!!
My understanding from other sources is that the Romans left the field because Aetius still hoped to one day utilize Hunnic forces for Rome. And of course his troops were exhausted along with the question of the Visigoths staying to finish the fight. Attila on his part was said to have built a large pile of saddles and things to burn himself up if the Roman forces attacked his encampment and it fell. At best I believe it could be called a " draw " . A pity Attila wasn't finished then and there . Italy suffered for it with the attacks later on and it further brought about the fall of the Western Empire . I enjoyed this presentation ! Thank you for it.😊
Me gustó mucho, estaré pendiente de ese canal para ver próximaxs batallas. Me gustaria ver las batallas de Napoleón Bonaparte.
Awesome. Welcome to the channel
Az a probléma, hogy Catalaunum illetve Mariacum környékén, bár kutatások folytak, nem találják a nyomait sem egy ilyen volumenű ütközetnek. Viszont írásos nyomai vannak az elmúlt századok történelem hamisitasanak.
the only falsifications are in your Hungarian history books, Attila was a bluff
Yes man! If Atilla was a bluff, you don't even exist s.t.u.p.i.d!@@garlic2006
@@garlic2006- olvasgass még !
Hiányos a tudásod ! .....
:)
@@garlic2006 ostoba a hozzászólásod
@@janicomp Hungary has lost all wars and all battles, and you now use Attila to defame the Romans re-inventing and
distorting history. SHAME. Attila was humiliated, this is history. STOP.
Én hallottam olyan előadást amelyben a professor azt mondta hogy nem volt csata.Egy csomó ember meghalt volna értelmetlenül.A másik dolog ha volt ütközet nem a legyőzött szokott helyben maradni hanem a gyöztes.A rómaiak hagyták ott a csatateret.
Hamisitott történelem.
Fentebb én is ezt írtam angolul, hogy a kretén nyugatiak is értsék. Habár nem hiszem, hogy menni fog nekik ahhoz ész is kellene, az meg nincs nekik.
Minden esetre nem találják az állítólagos csatateret. Igazad van ,nem a legyőzött maradt a csatatéren,hanem a győztes,akkoriban még a győztes feladata volt,az elesettek eltemetése . Még valami fontos,a vizi gótok királya elesett,másnap reggelre a gótok eltüntek,számukra az volt fontos ,hogy ki legyen a királyuk. Aetius amikor látta,hogy kevesen vannak ,visszatért Rómába,ahol meggyilkolták. Győztes Hadvezért ki szoktak végezni? Ha Atilla lett volna a vesztes,milyen Hadsereggel indult volna 452-ben Róma ellen? A hunok reflexijjai sokkal távolabbi hatással rendelkeztek,mint az ellenségé . Ugyan az,vagy hasonló játszódhatot le ,mint Carreránál a Pártusok idején !
харош мультики показывать.
эту битву народов описали Францисканские монахи наблюдавшие за ней с холма.
против 150 нахов во главе с Атиллой из племени гунов. рим выставил 1 миллион солдат. по 300 тыс от рима от галлов и готтов и через 3 дня за счет числености римский генерал Аврелий хотел их окружить зажав к реке Кельн в германии нынешей это. Атилла угадав его план ночью перевел армию через кельн и захватил крепость позади себя осел там а римская армия не решилась пойти вслед за нахами( Аланы Гунны Викинги Англы варяги это все разные названия одного и того же народа с кавказа. Нахов. ведущих свой род от предка Ноха. ( библейского Ноя .Ноаха)
Атилла послал за подмогой на родину вестника и через год к нему прибыло еще 250 тыс Нахов. их в европе знают как 1авар- это переводится как пришел пожить. на время. вот там и был воплощен план Барбаросса. 3 удара в разные точки чтоб не дать Риму как раньше обьединиться в миллионную армию как при Колотуанской битве.
к тому же пока атилла был в европе на его родину напали Сарматы и нахам пришлось часть войск отсылать на кавказ чтоб обезопасить родину и генералы Курмих и Басих с сыном Атиллы Динцигом через Азовское море вернулись и истребили акациров-сарматов напавших на аланию а потом совершили поход за каспий и там тоже разогнали их логово и после этого про них никто слышал в мире.
на самом деле Атилла и Нахи даже не хотели покорять ни рим ни европу они просто преследовали ост-Готов которые вместе со славянами первые напали на аланию перейдя за реки Тина и Итиль на кавказ 600 тыс войском и когда нахи погнали их со своей земли то славяне спрятались выжившие в полуночных землях на севере а ост-готы бежали к западным готам спастись преследуемые гуном Атилой со 150 тыс армией Нахов-Аланов. вот так они и дошли до запада и рим встал на их пути. но после того как рим нанес серьезный урон нахам то они уже решили поквитаться и с Римом. и так и сделали. потом.
@@tereziacsizmadia34 why Hungarians care for Atillla or the Huns?
Hungarians are Slavs, nothing to do with the Huns
Research will continue in 2024. We HUNGARIANS are a very mixed ethnic group, but current research shows many similarities with the Huns. We are related to the Turks, Uighurs, Huns, Xuanzhuans and many other ethnic groups. I used to say that we are a mixture of many peoples, because we lived a nomadic lifestyle, so it is not surprising that we mixed with many peoples before we arrived in the Carpathian Basin. According to one of the claims, we came from the Uyghurs from today's Ural Mountains or the state of So, which is now China, where the Xuanxuans and the Turks also came from. There are words of Hun origin in our language, for example hitü = faith (in Hungarian, hit). I hope I was able to provide new information. A Hungarian history teacher. And thanks to the site for the great battle scenes!
Exatamente. Húngaros tem origens nos Unos.
The magyars never been "nomadic people"! That is a fals propaganda! Neither in their Hun ages ....Nomadic people did not built enormous cites like Tongwangcsen= Fehérvár in Asia neither Etzilburg wich is a german word for Atila"s castle (later called Vetus Buda) in moun-tain of Pilis.Vetus is latin word means "Old"....Yes Hungarians are mixed people like french or british people! Hun-magyars has many scythian tribes like asi-alans called by romans Jazigs =jász! besenyő=pecheneggs,palóc,matyó,pannon,avar,szeklers=székely=hun,etc...They are all huns. with..R1 A genetic code!
I believe there is considerable evidence that Attila’s forces Formed a defensive circle with his baggage train. He was expecting an attack. When it dos not come he retreated. Aetius also withdrew realizing his shaky Visigoth alliance. I see it as a tactical draw but strategic
win for Rome.
True attlla invaded Italy a year or so latter., knowing he could not attack Gaul again. Italy proved a mistake, it was a soft target,except for the Italian summer and annual disease season. Another strategic loss ensued.
"annual disease season" mean but true xD
Sajnos ez nem így volt!Johnconnery! Semmiféle védőkör nem kellett! Ön keveri a dolgokat ,az a következő évben volt az elfogult nyugati tudósítás szerint Aquiella ostrománál! Aetius ,ha egyáltalán volt csata elhagyta a csatamezőt, mert a gótok királya meghalt a csatában ,ezért a nagyszámú gót sereg elvonult...Aetius legfőbb szövetségese híjján távozott! Észak Gallia a hunok uralma alá került 53 várost dúltak fel! Miként észak Italia (NEM volt Olaszország! Az majd csak a XIX. században lesz!)is a hunok uralma alá került ,mert elfoglalták Rómáig a pápa maga ment és hódolt be ,térdelt le Atila NagySámán előtt! Semmiféle hiba nem volt Róma hódoltatásában! Mivel Atila Senyő hódóltatta a Pápát! Aki szimbólikusan megadta magát, átadta a város kulcsát! Továbbá nem csak letérdelt Atila előtt, hanem Királlyá is Koronázta! A Hun-magyarok felszámolták a római rabszolgatartó szisztemet! Az szúrta a szemüket! Nekik nem voltak rabszolgáik, mivel megvetették a rabszolgatartást és a rabszol-gatartókat is! Náluk csak szolgák voltak! Rendszerint hadifoglyok ,akik bármikor személyes bátorság vagy egyéb hasznos tudás esetén, bármikor újra szabad emberekké válhattak!
Excellent Episode 👍
Amazing that the battle site has yet to be discovered 🤔😡
imagine how many times they cultivated that land in 1500 years!!!
imagine being there seeing this battle in person.... this battle truly molded Europe to what it is today. crazy.. if the huns won history would have been far different
A Hunok nyertek. Ettől ilyen a történelem ma.
not really! we won all the battles in our European tours, but never conquered any land. The Carpathian Valley is more precious and fruitful than any other country in Europe!
The huns won. But Attila was killed in 453.
These videos are so cool. Everything you need to see and hear about the battles of the past in stunning visuals and great narration. Some of those shots are the closest things we will prob see to how these battles looked like. Great job I’m looking forward for more!
Thanks, more to come soon
Sorry...cannot understand your pronunciation. Especially the group names. A bit fast.
If you like living in Fantasyland
A-HUNOK-NEM--VESZTETTEK-4555-BEN....
ETIL-,NEMVESZTETT-....,AETIUS-NEM--"NYERT"..
Increíble el daño que causaban con sus jinetes arqueros, y que pocas tribus e imperios lograron imitarlos al mismo nivel de disparo extra largo.
Incredible the damage caused by their mounted archers, and that few tribes and empires were able to imitate at the same level of extra long range shoot.
3. typ.. 1 ..Great-long =türkish-bow 800 meter ...2. Hun-bow medium 600 meter ..3. rapid-bow mongol medium 400-500 meter ....europer arrows 220-300 meter ...
@@gaborbaki6983 , turkish bow on a horse?, and why they didn't conquer half of the world as them?, although some say thah turks are descendents of huns, and them of mongols...
@@Ulises-Gonzalez-3131 göktürk empire...hun empire...mongol empire...et Timur kán-Tamerlan sah= turco-mogollar sultan --turan -lideri ...Türkish bow 120 kg -power , grande radius ..minimal problem horse-expedition...
Нищо не разбирам от шибания ви английски език пишете си едни на други
@@Ulises-Gonzalez-3131... well, you're right, the Turks and the Huns are related. The Mongol ruler Genghis Khan had many Turkish/Hun soldiers in his army. Whether the Huns are descended from the Mongols has not yet been fully clarified, as the opinions of many historians differ. But the languages are very similar ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan ... the Turks had a large empire on three continents that lasted 500 years. Why should the sultans expand their empire to the east? It would have been unwise to control and steer such an empire, as we see with the Huns, Romans and Mongols (the Mongol empire did not last long). If you look closely at the standard of the Turkish president, you will see the sun surrounded by 16 small stars at the top left. The sun represents today's Türkiye, the 16 small stars represent the empire of the Turks in history .. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Seal_of_Turkey here is a link to Göktürks .. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6kt%C3%BCrks
This is my favorite new channel
More about Spartan, please :)
Quality as always
Mulțumesc pentru acest material!
Anglosajón anglosajón anglosajón pero qué siempre pasa con el idioma que aquí se utiliza?😢😢 el anglosajón no 👎 tiene nada de la gracia necesaria para hacer traducciones, en cambio el idioma que aquí se utiliza es completamente válido para hacerse entender mundialmente ❤😊
Incredible as usual
One year after the battle, the Huns were already at the walls of Rome. This was painted in fresco in the Vatican. Unfortunately, it gives bad knowledge.
Exactly.
Great history video 📹
Glad you enjoyed it
It's nicely done, thank you bro. 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Welcome 😊
Ich habe mir diese Schlacht bereits im kommentarbereich der Schlacht an der Milvinischen Brücke gewünscht. Ich denke nicht das dieses Video auf meinem Wunsch entstanden ist aber trotzdem danke.
I take the viewers suggestions, and there are many more waiting :)
- Tisztelt voster77 hh! Atila itt van eltemetve a városi stand kerítésénél,az áruház parkolója alatt. (Megnézheti!)
Hind sight being 20-20, Attila would have accomplish a decisive defeat on the Romans if he could of further drew him into open territory. As it was Attila stopped and encamped a mile or so into open country. The Romans had their backs to restricted terrain and thus were protected from encirclement. If they had moved further into open territory then the exceptional Hun cavalry would have been able to surround them and cut them to pieces. War is always full of what ifs, but as I said I would have encamped farther away from the Romans and force them to come to him. This would have most surely of happened since the Romans were the ones perusing.
Very interesting images we can see how the battle developed .
Given the confusion, lack of clear goals, repeated engagements with various allies, etc., most wars seem to me like little more than a harsh and inefficient method of population control.
Most of Earth was empty. This was a long time before Paul Ehrlichs book "Population Bomb"
MANNN !!! INCREDD vid !!
I feel INTENSE bumps !! 🦾💥
👏👏👏🙏
Thanks
the battle weakened the Huns. Attila died two years later and his "empire" was no more within 18 years.
AVARIZTAN empire 490-803 : danmark to kaukazus hill
@janibeg3247
The Western Romans didn't fare any better...A few years after the Catalaunian battle of 451 CE.
Aetius was summoned by Emperor Valentinian III to the Imperial Palace in Ravenna to report on financial matters in 454 CE. When Aetius informed about the state of the treasury, suddenly the emperor rose from the throne and began to accuse Aetius of accusations of acting against him. He accused him of losing his throne rights in the Eastern Empire because of him, and now Aetius sought to take power from him in Ravenna. Then the emperor stood up and hit the Roman commander in the head several times on the head, killing him on the spot. Aetius’ comrades shared his fate.
The death of Flavius Aetius, baptized as the “the last of the Romans”, definitely meant no chance of rebuilding the Western Roman Empire and led Rome to the abyss. Procopius reports that the emperor, after killing Aetius, was to ask a certain Roman whether he had made the right decision by removing Aetius; he would answer: “Good or bad, I don’t know that, but I know you have cut off your right hand with your left.”
The western empire suffered several Gothic invasions and, in AD 455, was sacked by Vandals. Rome continued to decline after that until AD 476 when the western Roman Empire came to an end.
And what about the Hungarian Kingdom which was a heir of Attila? It survived for centuries on while the Roman Empire collapsed in 476???
awesome video man
It was so EPIC
I enjoyed every minute of it
I don't know which battle you're planning to cover next but please consider covering the battle of Anglon 543
It's highly underrated
Yes.. total war games is the best for depicting historical battle
Stunning representation of the scale of this and such
(LARGER ?)
engagements.
Thwarting Attila made perfect sense if the objective was restoring this territory to Rome-
AND the empire would not reach critical mass at home.
Really intriguing. ❤
So, the battle of the Catalaunian Plains was NOT the fall of Atilla the Hun.
Not directly
@Aditu Laudis, could format videos of older battles, for example, the Battle of Kadesh, between Hittites and Egyptians, the wars between Hazael and Assyria, the Battle of Karkar, involving Israel, Aram and Assyria. Thanks.
I enjoyed the description of the conflict. The Germans referred to it as the 'Hunnenschlachtlied' in which tale annually the spirits of the fallen Germans and Huns arose on the anniversary of the battle and fought once more in the same hilly land. In legend one million men fought that day. Incidentally, I thought the general view was that Attila killed his brother, Breda, for some reason. As for Aetius, I had read that his Roman legionaires were mostly German recruits. He himself might be Germanic, taking a Roman, or Romanized variant when he joined the Roman Army. At any rate the Germanic tribal alliance could certainly use the well-trained Roman legion(s) which Aetius commanded. To add a family-feud-type ingredient, the Goths of the east (Ostrogoths) were vassals of Attila's Huns, paying tribute each year. Part of that relationship might mean contributing troops to an Attila war scheme.
Aetius was a Roman Citizen of Scythian origins.
@@lucatampellini9734 If this is factual, it accords well with the historical westward migration: Sacae>Scythians>Germanic tribes. Another line involved the Gauthei>Gothi>Getae>Goths>Gauls. Since they were all found together with the Scythians, many historians believe they originated with the Sacae. There seemed to be a strong link with the Northern Kingdom of Israel, which was taken into bondage and placed in "the land of Goshen, Habor and the Medes." They never returned to Israel. The tribe of Dan seemed to have eluded this bondage by taking to the sea and colonizing southern and western Europe. However, 200,000 of Judah were seized from the northern areas of that kingdom and taken into the Assyrian bondage, along with the Northern Kingdom. This was a massive effort on Assyria's part, as the Northern Kingdom was estimated to be about eleven million people at that time. It is important in tracing these matters to recall that the Hebrew language was typically written without vowels. Thus, for example, the tribe of Dan might leave its colonizing mark as 'Dan,' 'Dun' ('Dunne'), 'Den,' 'Din,' 'Don' etc. The name 'Donnell' might be originally 'Dan El' ('Dan of God, tribe thereof). 'Bogdan' seemed to be another of these traces found in the Balkans. From Greece to Ireland one could find the marks of Dan. If this is true of Dan, it may well be true of others. For example, Juteland, if properly pronounced, would be 'Ju•te' or 'Ju•tah', which accords with the tribe of Judah. Also, Judah was the royal tribe whereto the sceptre had been assigned. It seems many European kings arose in the area. Parenthetically, the Holy Roman Empire of Charlemagne embraced almost the entirety of the Germanic peoples. One might conclude that the Northern Kingdom of Israel had been transferred into Europe where it was reconstituted. Some might see the hand of God in this. Be that as it may, we know from Scripture that the people of the Hebrew covenant were to be called "in Isaac's name" ('Saac' or 'SC'). One of the last kings of Israel was Omri. The Assyrians pronounced the initial part of the name with a 'gh' or 'kh' guttural sound, producing a 'khumri' or 'ghomri.' Scholars conclude that the Cymbri of Wales derived naturally from this. So to, the Cimmerians and Gauthei. After all, in the Hebrew language, 'Omri' might be supplied with our 'e' or 'i' and been pronounced 'Khimri' or something akin.
Just in passing, you may recall the story in Scripture of "the coat of many colors." In the Cecil B. DeMille Hollywood rendering, this coat was depicted as a 'rainbow pattern.' However, this was surely all wrong. Referencing the Scythians again, this people migrated to some extent eastward as well as westward. There was discovered in China in modern times a mummy which did not bear the characteristics of the Chinese people anatomically or culturally (dress and accessaries). The mummy had a nordic bone structure and reddish-blonde or brown hair. It was wrapped in a woolen blanket or coat of many colored threads. Hence, one could immediately infer it was similar to the sweaters, blankets, shawls and coats commonly produced in Ireland and Scotland. From this mummy I believe that we can deduce the Scythians-Goths-Germanic people's generally appearance at that time, which was Caucasian and their culture bearing links to Israel, including 'clothing of blends of many colors.' The above, which I linked with the mummy discovery in northeastern China, may be thin, I'll admit, but its seemed consistent with the great migration of the Sacae-Scythian-Goth-Germanic people into Eurasia and, thereafter, into central and western Europe. Also, I am careful not to speak loosely regarding 'Hebrew' and 'Israel.'
@@lucatampellini9734 Yes indeed
@@johnsavers1168 Pure speculation and very biased Hebrew centric approach to the history
The chronology doesn't match
In Eastern steppe empires there is a tradition of dual leadership, so Attila did not kill his brother!
This video presents the events surrounding the Battle of Catalonia in a completely implausible and contrary to historical truth, something that has been done for several centuries. Attila was the emperor of the Hon-Bulgarian Empire. Aetius, Attila's uncle was appointed governor of Bai Galij (Gallia), which at that time was already a vassal country of Hon-Bulgar. The Hon-Bulgarians are not mercenaries, but masters of these lands, their allies are the fraternal tribes of the Burgundians and Faranagi (Franks), speaking the Thriok/Thracian/Tiurko-Bulgarian language. This is evident from the names of Lutetia (Leutheish - City of the Dragon), Paris (from Barrage - Dragon), Seine from Su-eni (Great River), Toulouse (Toulus - Capital City), etc. But falling under the influence of the Talmudists, taught to become an independent ruler of the whole of Gaul, Haiji Yauchi (Aetius) decided with the help of the Alans, the Visigoths and their leader Theodoric to raise a riot against his master and nephew Attila. The so-called Catalunya field was not called that before the battle, it was called Chulem, and on its summit there was a Tengri shrine of the god of herbivores Saban Thriok, from whose name the name of Champagne arose in the future. After the battle on June 21-22, 451, due to the fact that the most Visigoths and Ostrogoths of the two warring armies died there, this field was called "Hud Alan" ("Gothic field" in Thracian-Bulgarian language), which phonetically changes among the local Franks, Burgundians and Celts (Gauls), it took the form of the Catalan field. Attila emerges victorious from the battle. And this is evident in his subsequent campaign in Italy in 452. There he captured Ak avil (White Fortress, Aquileia), destroyed it and forced its population to move to the nearby islands in the sea, so as not to execute them on land according to Bulgarian law. There they built the city of Benedict, today called Venice. The city was built with the help of Bulgarian builders in the sea with millions of wooden supports from larch trees that grow only in Bulgarian Siberia. How were these millions of trees transported from Siberia 4000 km away. from Venice, let Western historiography explain it without lying. How would this city have looked if Attila had been defeated??!
Attila is still alive, in the person of the Chuvash people (Suvars) they have preserved their language, but he is dying, his name is translated as father, father of peoples
A nevét Isten ostora- ként maradt fenn. A királyok Királya. 13 koronával temették el, hármas koporsóban, a hazájában, Magyarországon.
Угр - Аттила никакого отношения не имеет к чувашам , удмурты , ханты , коми , мари - гунны !
Subtitles in catalan. VERY WELL! Subscribed forever :)
Thank you man. Don't forget the notification bell :)
@@AdituLaudisMMXXI done!
Nicely done, but one mention about the visual effects on battle map. Why there are no differences between different types of units, archers, light/heavy infantry and cavalry, romans and their allies? At least minimum differences should be. In rest gj!!
Great cinematic story telling.
Thx
There is only one question: after the battle who owns the battlefield? In this case these were the Huns and not the Romans. The Romans left the battlefield that is: they left their deads and woundeds together with their assets, treasuries etc there for the Huns. At that time - later on too, even to our present days - it is important for an army to take care for the dead, and woundeds of theirs and not to leave them for the will and mercy of the enemy. So no doubt: the winner was Attila and also were the Huns!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
True
Well , to me, that's a new version of History here. The Franks played a role on Aetius side. You describe them mostly as ennemies.. Never heard that before. Knowing the benefit the Franks got from the output of this battle I am surprised by this new version.
I believe there were two factions inside the Frankish realm. One which sided with the puppet placed by Atilla
It's a modern Anglo-Saxon version of the story, with the Franks never being well presented on principle (just like the French in the movie "Dunkirk"). As history is not a science ..; moreover, historically, the location of the Catalan fields is arbitrary. And these are not Romans, but Gallo-Romans. Moreover, the francs could naturally be more easily qualified as Belgians ("Gauls"), than as Germans. It's just a question of point of view, given the concrete lack of material for the origin of the francs (which means 'free'; I don't think there was only one free tribe in the Germans ..; and men released from the Roman yoke would have much more reason to call themselves "free men" - in the emancipated sense, It makes more sense from an anthropological point of view ).
Nice👍🏻👌🏻. Good Work👍🏻
Thank you!
Who is burgund Warrior in the battle
I do love watching the huge army on the move.
great video with details!
Thanks Sergey!
Before the Battle of Catalonia, the Huns had already driven the Romans out of Pannonia. As early as 387, Rome surrendered to the Huns to Attila's father, Bendegúz. Both Rome and Constantinople paid taxes to the Huns.
istvanhuni! -Ennek a pár leírt sornak,maradtak,tárgyi,feltáratlan emlékei,itt a föld alatt.A Polgármester úr betiltotta, az Atila fürdője,vagy Atila temetkezése,stb részletes vizsgálatát.
کیرم تو کون هر چی هون و هونپرست
Also after the battle the huns raided italy, the battle was ultimately a delaying action instead of a strategic victory.
Attila's father name was Mundus.
Отца Аттилы звали Мунзук .
best animations… felt like I was there
Thanks
😂
Great video as always! As a follow-up to this battle, please do a video on the Sack of Aquileia (452 C.E.), where Attila gets his revenge on Aetius by razing the city of Aquileia (considered to be the Venice of the Roman Empire before Venice was established as a city), and causing a massive famine to break out in the Italian peninsula due to his plundering of northern Italy. You should also do more non-historical battles, such as the Ostrogoths vs. the Jutes for Total War: Attila, Odrysian Kingdom vs. Massilia for Total War: Rome II, Otomo vs. Hattori for Total War: Shogun 2, and Zheng Jiang/Tai Bandits vs. Sun Jian/Wu for Total War: Three Kingdoms.
Yeah, too many people see this battle as a roman victory over the huns when in reality it was a last ditch effort to survive that ultimately didn't stop the huns from doing what they wanted.
This battle delayed the huns, but attila came back later.
- Valami nincs rendben! A másik videó határozottan állítja,hogy Atila 452-ben meghalt. Eltemették. Erre később olyan választ kaptam,hogy 455-ben halt meg! A kitett videó,igaz legyen! Atila 62 évesen halt meg?
Good video brother. One constructive criticism. X is for infantry / is for cavalry. According to your map everyone is on foot.
Thanks for that!
Very good!!! Well done!!!
Thanks a lot!
Appreciate your efforts but PLEASE factor in narrator audio vs sound effects (as good as they are).
Tweak down the effects a little so we can understand better.
Thanks for the feedback
From the Hungarian side it was the fall of the Roman Empire. After one week of bloody battle in constant rain, the loss was tremendous on both sides. The gothic ally of the romans lost their king and they left the battlefield. Next morning no Army was standing against each other. There were three days waiting on the battlefield without fight and Atilla started to retreat as the Romans did the same. This is all fiction in the video!
Ez az adása egy bunkónak , nem más mint lejáratásunk . Stb...
Alans also fought alongside Huns. Attila won, he stayed on the battlefield and the enemy retreated
I dont think this battle was the knockout-blow it used to be seen as. Aetius didnt risk a pursuit. Atilla was still able to invade Italy the following year.
It wasn’t
I often couldn't tell the combatants apart, but apparently they couldn't either, LOL!
pretty much :P
Great video. The picture of Attila appears to very appropriate, since the Huns had been in Europe for several generations and no doubt did a little mixing with the natives.
Thanks Chuck!
Not at all. According to the contemporary Roman historian Priscus, Attila as well as the Huns had a typical north east asian look.
The Huns consisted of two groups, the ruling class and the ruled. The ruling class was small numbers of those east asian hordes such as Mongol, Manchu, Xianbei or Xiongnu (FYI. there were so many bigger or smaller east asian nomad nations throughout central and north east asia)while the ruled were the people who were gradually annexed by the Huns on the way to the west. The history says that the Romans didn't know where the Huns came from and this give us very important clue. If they were from Turkey or somewhere near, Romans could write so. There were nothing mysterious about the huns in that case.
It is really funny that the western historians are trying their absolute best to ignore the record from Priscus, one of the most important and reliable sources regarding the huns as well as attila, and people still think Attila was some sort of middle eastern lol. Do you guys feel shame or get your ego hurt if you guys were conquered and destoryed twice by the North East Asians? I wonder. Is that the reason?
In short, were the huns Turkish? No, turkish people were one of those who ruled by the huns. were they inflused by the huns? Yes the turkish were culturally influenced by the huns so they still have some east asian heritages but that's all about it. You know, Vietnamese were ruled by French for a while and they were culturally influenced by French, however that doesnt make the French or Joan d'arc as their ancestor, nor have French Vietnamese look but why portray Atiila as caucaisan? Is that some sort of joke?
Priscos rhetor - Atillát...folyamatosan Szkitának nevezi ..... !
:)
- mint ahogy a Magyarokat is Szkitának hivják ... !
:)
Great video my friend! Historical battle that changed the course of human history! Keep up the great work
Thank you man!
@@AdituLaudisMMXXI The only probem here is : The huns von this batle because the romans diapeared overnight, therefore the huns did not find the in the early morning. LOOK AFTER THE RIGHT HISTORY. Attila lost the batle = Tis is hapened the other way around.!
@@AdituLaudisMMXXI харош мультики показывать.
эту битву народов описали Францисканские монахи наблюдавшие за ней с холма.
против 150 нахов во главе с Атиллой из племени гунов. рим выставил 1 миллион солдат. по 300 тыс от рима от галлов и готтов и через 3 дня за счет числености римский генерал Аврелий хотел их окружить зажав к реке Кельн в германии нынешей это. Атилла угадав его план ночью перевел армию через кельн и захватил крепость позади себя осел там а римская армия не решилась пойти вслед за нахами( Аланы Гунны Викинги Англы варяги это все разные названия одного и того же народа с кавказа. Нахов. ведущих свой род от предка Ноха. ( библейского Ноя .Ноаха)
Атилла послал за подмогой на родину вестника и через год к нему прибыло еще 250 тыс Нахов. их в европе знают как 1авар- это переводится как пришел пожить. на время. вот там и был воплощен план Барбаросса. 3 удара в разные точки чтоб не дать Риму как раньше обьединиться в миллионную армию как при Колотуанской битве.
к тому же пока атилла был в европе на его родину напали Сарматы и нахам пришлось часть войск отсылать на кавказ чтоб обезопасить родину и генералы Курмих и Басих с сыном Атиллы Динцигом через Азовское море вернулись и истребили акациров-сарматов напавших на аланию а потом совершили поход за каспий и там тоже разогнали их логово и после этого про них никто слышал в мире.
на самом деле Атилла и Нахи даже не хотели покорять ни рим ни европу они просто преследовали ост-Готов которые вместе со славянами первые напали на аланию перейдя за реки Тина и Итиль на кавказ 600 тыс войском и когда нахи погнали их со своей земли то славяне спрятались выжившие в полуночных землях на севере а ост-готы бежали к западным готам спастись преследуемые гуном Атилой со 150 тыс армией Нахов-Аланов. вот так они и дошли до запада и рим встал на их пути. но после того как рим нанес серьезный урон нахам то они уже решили поквитаться и с Римом. и так и сделали. потом.
Could I suggest that in the battle maps you use the internationally recognised symbols to differentiate infantry from cavalry, otherwise good.
While its true that there was some controversy about the origin of the Huns, the consensus after recent decades is that they were Turks of Oghuric affiliation, mostly based on credible studies confirming that the vast majority of attested Hunnic names, as well as all Hunnic successor clans are of evident Oghur Turkic origin.
All Hunnic tribes (entirely Oghur Turkic) :
Akatziri, Onogurs, Utigurs, Sabirs, Bulgars, Saragurs, Kutrigurs, Barsils, Balanjars
Recorded Hunnic names of Turkic origin :
Aigan = moon prince; from Turkic aï & can
Alp Ilutuer / Ilteber = heroic chieftain; from Turkic alp & iltäbär
Althias = six; from Turkic Alti
Akkagas = white rock; from Turkic ak & kayač
Atakam = elder shaman; from Turkic ata & kam
Balach = calf; from Turkic Malaq
Berik = strong; from Turkic Berık
Basik = governor; from Turkic Bârsiğ
Bleda = wise; from Turkic Bildä
Bochas = either gullet; from Turkic Boğuz; or bull, from Buqa
Dengizich = ocean-like, heavenly; from Turkic teɲez & dêɲri; or, more simply, great lake
Donat / Donatu = horse; from Turkic Yonat
Edeco = good; from Turkic Ädgü
Ellac = to rule; from Turkic el & lä
Emmedzur = horse lord; from Turkic Ämäcur
Eskam / Esqam = companion of the shaman; from Turkic Eŝkam
Hereka / Kreka = pure princess; from Turkic Arïqan
Ernakh / Hernac = small man, heroic man; from Turkic Ernäk
Iliger = prince man; from Turkic ilig & är
Karadach = black mountain; from Turkic Qaradağ
Karaton = black cloak; from Turkic Qarâton
Kursik = either noble; from Turkic Kürsiğ; or belt-bearer, from Qurŝiq
Kutilzis = blessed herald; from Turkic kut & elči
Mundzuk = bead; from Turkic Munčuq
Oebarsius / Aybars = moon leopard, from Turkic Aïbârs; or dun leopard, from oy & bars
Oldogan / Odolgan = either red falcon; from Turkic al & dogan; or chubby, from Tolgun
Oktar / Uptar = brave; from Turkic Öctär
Ruga / Rua = wise man; from Turkic Ögä
Turgun = still/calm; from Turkic Turkun
Uldin = six; from Turkic Alti
Zolban = shepherd star; from Turkic Čolpan.
i'm shocked, another turk claiming somebody else was a turk, they were not turks, they came from the Xiongnu Empire. They were not Turks, any credible unbiased source will tell you that they were NOT.
Oghur tam olarak ne demek ?
ATTILA-etele =volga river birth ..europe hun Hun army 70% oguz-onogur ..15% mongol et 15% mandzsu-tunguz-yuezhi ...turco-mogollar armada
according the turboturks everybody is turk...anyhow huns ruled the stepps way before turks emerged so to turks were one of the vassal of them
@@latakicsi2183 idiots -dzsukell... Hun langue ..old-türk...old-bolgar....Hun armada 60% türk-oguz ....et 20% mongol et 20% tunguz-mandzu/kushan-kusu- bird totem/... sztyeppe-riders unió
Growing up in Belgium that battle still resonates to this day, people are quite aware that had the Huns won Europe would be a very different place today...The strange thing though is that nobody knows where these legendary Catalaunian plains are in France..
It was very problematical to follow the events on the "reference map" as all the units from both sides appearing on it where misrepresented as infantry ("X") as some were actually cavalry ("/"). Distinguishing between the cavalry units and the infantry units and where they were located relative to each other by using the appropriate icons would have helped explain better how this battle unfolded.
Understood
جميل جدا أستمر
The Huns did not win,but they were not defeated.The Romans were not defeated,but they could not win.
It was more of a stalemate than a victory on either side.
@@timothylee2772 Yes,start with development,without a complete result.
@@nikolaykolev1438 Actually, in the game of chess, we call that a draw. Had the Huns won the battle outright, European history would have been different.
@@timothylee2772 Their very appearence shows that the history of Europe has become different.
Only one question: who stayed on the battlefield after the clash and who left?? The answer is: the Huns stayed and the Romans left. More questions???
This is the era of the myth/legend Niebelungeleid. It arose out of the betrayals that led to the alliance of the Franks with the Huns. The Fritz Lang 1924 silent film, Die Nibelungen captures some of the elements of what might be a far echo of something that happened in reality but was never recorded by a chronicler. at the time. It's worth the time to experience the mood of it as something that remained in the German subconscious up to the time of the film at least.
Doesn't a solid wedge cav charge only bottleneck your own cav and run them into their own horses. A hollow or mostly hollow edge shape would be much better
but then it has no mass
@@mcsmash4905 why would you want your comrade ramming into your back. That's kinda gay and will cause your horse to panic
On the battle map you show all units as infantry. You need to distinguish which is which.
Noted
Ha Aetius győzött volna akkor egy évvel később, Atilla - nem jutott volna úgy rómáig , mint kés - a vajban... - úgy hogy Rómába ...
be sem kellett mennie ..... !
Róma kegyelmet kért, és kapott - Atillától.... !
:)
Bizonyos - adó terhe mellett !
..... !
Kegyelmet gyakorolt..... ! *
Róma püspöke...fogadta .....
"Kiméld meg ezt a várost...
...őseink, apostolaink csontjai nyugszanak itt " ! ..... *
Ohhhhhhh! Muy interesante! Historias poco difundidas. Grácias por subirlo.
Atilla achieved his goal. The Visigoth king Theodoric fell, and the Visigoths, Bugunds, and Geman allies fled during the night after the battle, so Atilla returned to Hungary. Aetius' battered legionary infantry would have had no chance of successfully confronting Attila's horse-archers. His most capable corps was formed by the Visigothic cavalry, organized in the Hun style, who left him alone. He had no choice but to admit the futility of continuing the battle and withdrew. You don't need to be a military expert to understand what happened and who won. According to this, the superiority of the Huns at the end of the battles compared to the strength of the opponent was not three to one, but rather five to one. We do not know of another example of Atilla's self-restraint in history. What kind of attraction and calculation could have led the great king of the Huns to retreat? Writes the Frenchman Eric Deschodt in his 2006 work analyzing Atilla's reign and military actions with exceptional objectivity and expertise. Atilla spared Aetius' life because he would fall in the event of a collision. This was the reason for Atilla's restraint!
En kaliteli kanallardan birisiniz tebrik ediyorum emeğinize sağlık. Verdiğiniz mesajlardan bizimde ülke olarak almamız gerekenler var. Alabilen almıştır eminim. Ne diyelim anlayana sivrisinek saz..
Attila had found HIS MATCH on AETIUS...
they were friends when they were teenagers!
And I love your strategy introduction, too. (More detailed than TotalWarBattles)
Thanks
Az nem zavar, hogy Katalónia az Ibériai-félszigeten van, a catalaunumi csata helyszíne meg a mai Franciaország területén?
It seems Google translate does not get the translation right from english
Katalan es katalunya nem ugyan az!! A csata ugy dolt el, hogy a burgundok penzert ,aetiusz tol, elarultak a hunokat. Apropo! A burgundok is nomad nep ,csak korabban jottek europaba.....
Én úgy tudtam,hogy egy nagyon durva pestis járvány tört ki,amely mindkét hadat megtizedelte.Tulajdonképpen úgymond "győztes" egyikük sem lett.Jelentosen kozrejátszott mindket birodalom bukásában.Gardonyi Géza, "A láthatatlan ember"c. regényében gyönyörűen ír errol a csatarol.Nagyon jó a film!
Gárdonyi műve költői és szép. De Attila serege maradt ott a csatatéren, a másik elment - menekült. Az marad, aki győz. Ez logikus. Aetiust később kivégezték. Ez volt a jutalom a győzelemért?
@@ildikomakany3522 Így igaz.Rómaban kivegzessel nem jutalmaztak győzelemért.
Because the Huns managed to eliminate the king of their rivals and, most importantly, they had possession of the battlefield after the end of the battle, the outcome was likely a Hun victory.,
Hyun Jin Kim (2013). The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe. Cambridge University Press. pp. 76-77
The Romans were there too.
Enjoyed.👍👍
How ironic it is that the westerners are still scarced by Attila after 1500 years?!?!? Attila's empire survived in the Hungarian Kingdom for centuries - while the Roman Empire collapsed in 476. And Hungary is still in the middle of Europe. And still shows the only right way to the West in nowdays too!!!
That's right!
Ce que je trouve étonnant dans ce récit , c'est que l'on m'a appris que les francs faisaient partie de la coalition avec les romains ,et que
Aetius était gallo-romain.
Incorrect analysis. The battle was won by Rome and its allies, so much so that Attila retreated to his camp and had a wooden pyre built to commit suicide and avoid being captured by the subsequent Roman attack. Except that Ezio let him escape with his men for political, strategic or otherwise unclear reasons today. He probably did not trust some of his allies, who in battle could join the Huns by betraying.
❤❤❤
The Huns disappeared in Central Asia however in parts of Germany and France there are villages where the Huns have left their mark i.e. people who supposedly have Hun traits and appearances. In Hungary the given name Attila appears. It was during the 5thCentury CE that the Romans could no longer protect Britain and pulled out leaving the Britons to their own devices.
Ha jobb filmet akarsz, akkor megérted a Róma által elnyomott királyságok csatlakozását is.
When we say the name of Balambér's Hun grand prince or king (rex Hunnorum), we are immediately met with the statement that we know almost nothing about him and that his name is the only one left to us from the pen of the Gothic historian Jordanes (? - 553). They do not even mention the reports from Amminaus Marcelinus, or the data of the Chinese Vei su Chinese chronicle, or the descriptions of the Djagfar Tarihi, and I could list more. It is as if the excellent Hun Grand Duke had been written out of history.
The meaning of Balambér's name is derived from the Germanic name Baldemar instead of Bulyar-Bulumar. Ámbátor could be called Baldemár (bold) in their own language, but the Turkish word Bulyar means "of more blood".
The Djagfar Tarihi describes his father as Djilka (? - 363), his mother a Sarmatian princess called Vadamerca, so he was born in a mixed marriage "of several bloods". They describe the names of his ancestors and descendants and we can't even be surprised to find the names of Atilla, Ügyek, Álmos or even Árpád on the family tree.
Together with his father, Balambér conquers the Arsacid diastina of the Alans and its people, and after his father's death, he invades the empire of the Eastern Goths and destroys the army of King Ermanrik. The Huns make the direct descendant of the king who fell in battle, Hunimund (an interesting name!), the lord of the conquered Eastern Goths, while the rebels continue to fight with the counter-king Vithimir. Not long after, in the spring of 375, Vithimir falls in a bloody battle, the remaining part of his army surrenders or flees with the loss of his head among the Western Goths.
Athanarich, the king of the Western Goths, thought he could resist the Huns, but he was wrong, and in the end he himself had to flee. Some of the Western and Eastern Goths asked for admission to the Eastern Roman Empire, while the rest of the Goths surrendered to the weapons of the Balambéres.
Within a short time (in 377), an internal conflict developed between the Romans and the Goths, and to their greatest surprise, the Goths called the Huns to help themselves.
Roman propaganda.
The Huns went into Italy and the Romans paid a lot of gold without any resistance.
Atilla's calculations worked. The falcon statue, the gate and the huge bonfire strengthened the Huns and their allies and weakened the opponents. When Atilla reached the battle line of the Gepid left wing with his archer bodyguards, he immediately saw that the blood-drunk Gepids and their Germanic allies were slaughtering the helpless legionnaires to the last man. He was relieved. , when it was reported that Aetius was alive. The deathly silence after the noise of battle was broken by the thunderous shouts of triumph from the victory-drunk Hun and allied fighters. Victory, victory! Blessings Atilla! Blessings Atilla!
To this day, the majority of Western and Hungarian historians describe the Battle of Catalunya primarily based on Jordanes' chronicle, The History of the Goths. The chronicle was written by the Gothic bishop of Ravenna a century after the battle, and in his biased writing he clearly wanted to present the Goths and the Romans in a favorable light. Thus, we must significantly revise the clash that took place on the battlefield of Catalanaum on July 5, 451. According to this, at the end of the battles, the superiority of the Huns compared to the strength of the enemy was not three to one, but rather five to one!
The Hun camp was swimming in happiness. And the surviving warriors of the opponent thought with dread of the next day's battle, which would bring their complete annihilation. It was reported to Aetius that after the Alans, the Gallic Zealots and the Franks, the Visigoths had also failed him! If Attila attacks again, he will easily finish us off, said Aetius. He watched intently in the direction of the Hun camp behind the falcon hill. However, no battle preparations were heard there. A Hun horn sounded, signaling an embassy. Three eagle hunters arrived. Aetius immediately received them. The envoy handed over a letter in which Atilla had a short runic message: "May the blessing of Üstengri be upon you. We will meet in Rome next year." Later I will tell you about what happened in Rome!
Almost......Jordanes unvalid,hated huns and Atila Sanyjü......and lived 150 years later,than him.Priscos was valid,visited Atila more than once at his summer wooden palace.......
Seems to me a hun-biased version. Well, I was not there, but reported is, that Attila finally retreated ,not actually in a rout but a retreat it was. And a retreat ist not a a victory . The battle broke the hun`s reputation of being undefeatable, so it did.
Fun Fact: they had a large number of Germanic tribe's man apart of the hun army, Blessed Be.
🤣🤣🤣...¿Cómo que la caída de Atila? 🤣🤣🤣...¿Qué hizo al año siguiente Atila en el Norte de Italia?
😎
- 452 vagy 453 Atila halála.(Most nem írom ide,hogyan halt meg Atila.) Nem csatában esett el! A következő években Atila,egy fa szarkofágban,a temetkezési kamrájában,(A mai Áruház Busz parkoló alatt pihent.) - Tisztelt ellhunoatila nem godolja komolyan,hogy halott Atila csatázni járt? Valami nincs rendben az egész ide kitett videóval? A videóban minden fordítva van,mint ahogyan történt...-Na mind 1! megnéztem!
@@balibambosz333 A videó az események tipikus római változatán alapul. Kár, hogy a hunok nem hagytak írásokat.
Úgy gondolom, hogy a csata technikai döntetlen és taktikai visszalépés volt.
Róma annyira megtépázott, hogy a következő évben már nem tudta megvédeni Itáliát Attila támadásától, így a katalóniai csatát a hunok győzelme jelentette.
@@elhunoatila1 - A leírásnál,fordításnál,úgy lehet olvasni,hogy a Gótok Királyát a lovak halálra taposták..(Éjjel sötétben leesett a lóról) Később megtalálták,de már halott volt... Valami más is történt,mert a Gótok elvonultak új királyt választani...Vagy összevesztek a rómaiakkal? Aecio római hadvezér,éjjel menekülés közben a hunok táborába tévedt.A hunok nem bántották, az hitték tárgyalni jött...(Korábban Aeciot a hunok is nevelték...) A hunok ismerték,és Ő is ismerte, a hun szokásokat...A történészek vitatkoznak,hogy volt csata? Vagy nem történt meg?Furcsa feljegyzés,hogy a hunok a csatatéren maradnak..."Farkasként üvöltenek,"(Idéztem), dobolnak,és vonyítanak."Néha lóra kapnak,és kilovagolnak...Keresték az ellenséget...(Ezt külön is megkérdeztük az előadótól,hogy mit jelent? ) Miért dobolnak,miért vonyítanak? Ha nem volt csata,nem lehet döntetlen...A csata előtt az ellenfél,rómaiak,és a Gótok is lelépett:...A Hunok még 3 napig maradtak...Várták a felvonuló ellenséget...De az nem történt meg...Kettes változat. Éjjel volt a csata! A Hunok szerettek éjjel,vagy Hajnalban csatázni...A hatalmas zavar, ,keveredés, az ellenfél táborában, a Hunok támadása idézte elő,hogy a lovak eltaposták a Gótok Királyát...A rómaiak jól látták,hogy a Gótok nélkül,számukra,megsemmisítő vereség várható. A Gótok bizonytalan szereplése,talán ,már a csata ,vagy a felvonulás után,Ők is azt gondolták,a római vezér, a Hunokkal tárgyal. Atila 452 vagy 453 körül halt meg...Nem engedték,hogy a megtalált temetkezését,közelről vizsgáljuk...Halott vezér,(Beteg vezér,) Nem csatázik...A vesztes csata után a Hunok,nem vezettek volna a következő évben nagyszabású hadjáratot Atila vezetésével Itáliába...Az évszámok is hibás lehet...De a teljes,gondos ,vizsgálatot,a megtalált tárgyakon,betiltották...Atila fürdőjére, mindenre,a Polgármester úr,két nagy dupla vas rácsot,két nagy vas láncot,és két hatalmas lakatot tett! Ha erre jár,távolról megnézheti...Ez van! Tilos az eseményeket,közelről vizsgálni!
@@elhunoatila1- a hunok, már akkor irtak , amikor a legtöbb európai nép még nem is létezett..... !!! *
:)
Legyőzte Rómát ! ! ! *
Adót a vesztes szokott fizetni
a győztesnek ! .....
Ez a fő "baj Atilával....- Róma adót fizetett ! ! ! *
:)
I can't imagine being absolutely covered in blood from head to toe...and nowhere to wash up.
There were also Franks under their Prince Merovee present in the army of the Romans. The Huns allies included the Thuringians. Merovee was a protegee of Aetius.
And there were Franks in Attila's army too
先收藏，以后再看。
"Hey there, Mister Atilla. There's a marauding band of Visagoths to see y'all."
Die Schlacht auf den Katalaunischen Feldern 😉
Without the Goths the Roman’s wouldn’t have stood a chance at all. The Goths were direct descendants of the Scythians, the original horse lords of the steppe, and they knew how to fight the Huns