Husband's Ex-wife and Daughter Came Back for Inheritance of His Family Home After We Made a...
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- Husband's Ex-wife and Daughter Came Back for Inheritance of His Family Home After We Made a Will. But We Uncovered the Worst Truth in Court.
#redditrelationship #redditupdate -------------------------------------
♪ Tears (Prod. by MX Audio Library)
Link : • Tears - No Copyright M...
Licence: Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)
------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
These stories can be mix of fiction and dramatized accounts inspired by events that may occur in real-life. They are meant solely for entertainment purposes and should not be taken literally or considered factual. We do not recommend taking these stories seriously or using them as guidance for real-life decisions.
--------------------------------------
![[FULL STORY] My family are demanding I get back with my ex.](/img/n.gif)
That's what happens you try to shield your children from infidelity. Your just letting your spouse do whatever they want.
You took the words right out of my mouth
Agreed. Shielding your children from infidelity is an absolute no-no.
I can't believe yourself and over 100 people actually think this is real.
Do you honestly think there would be a jury trial over a Will dispute??
Noooooo, of course not.
Judge only, with mediators.
yeah, dude did all pos cheat mistakes possibles... DInt make a DNA test, dint tell the truth to his daughter, allow ex wife do whatever she wanted.... Then things got badder and badder... With the things the daughter was talking about new wife was clear ex wife was talking shit, and he dint revel the truth... Jesus christ
shielding your children about a lot of stuff is an absolute no-no@@danacarter9147
nice story. but defiantly did not happen. what country would have a court case over a will when the person is still alive? Then to have the daughter come over and eat dinner to get a DNA sample from a glass AND the court allow this test to be presented in the trial where there is no verification that the sample came from the daughter and not someone else?
Yeeeeeah, they claimed this was happening in Colorado, USA. No court would entertain this in any US state as it is not ripe for justiciability while the testator lives. 🤦🏻♀️ Fun story but utterly ridiculous on the law.
Also, if you suspected that paternity was at issue, you would bring that issue before the court and request that the Judge issue a subpoena for a DNA sample so there was no question of legitimacy of the sample.
Far as the DNA sample is concerned, cops do that allllll the time. They would follow a suspect and wait for them to leave a cigarette, cutlery from food courts, even drinks straws and cups so that part is at least plausible
plus the other side not being made aware of the evidence beforehand?
I don't think its admissible in court, just used as part of an investigation.
Plus, you have to follow discovery for any new evidence, for it to be admissible to the jury, you have to disclose the evidence to the judge and opposing Council BEFORE a trial.
Should have taken all child support from alice too
Hmmm why were they able to harass this family with this law suite? The divorce was final. That is terrible. He should have sold a house and buy another one in both their names.
honestly wtf is up with people that stand up for such evil from the devilish woman he took this man to hell and back ad lied to him for god knows how many years
Not the AH lol
>:(
🍌
Tom conveniently waited until he was no longer on hook for child support to "confess" that Candace was really his daughter. How noble.
Played both sides. But, well, what can be expected from the guy who sleeps with his friend's wife? Not exactly and examplar or virtue.
I want to believe he really did feel remorse for his actions, hence why he threw Amelia out. But I do realize it sure is convenient
i'd try sueing Tom to get at least part of the money back
Honestly, that made me laugh 😂😂😂
He could still be sued for support paid for that child over the years.
The man ain’t even dead and they’re already trying to get his property.
This story makes me want to rob myself
Sounds sort of weird, doesn't it? Almost like it's made up
That's what I said
This is why it's important the kids know the truth. So they can't be poisoned with lies. I'd rather help them through the shock and hurt of knowing the truth then deal with watching them become a horrid excuse of a person by being manipulated.
This is why I stopped hiding the fact that my oldest son's birth dad didn't care about him anymore, if at all. My late husband and I did everything we could to help him feel better about the cut off calls, broken promises and lies just to placate him. I stopped that after he tried to turn the situation on my son and make it his fault.. my son just recently turned 9. so he was trying to manipulate a small child.
No legal recourse for the mother and the actual father for fraud. Fuck that's criminal
Fr if I was OP’s husband, I’d sue them both for paternity fraud and get back every single cent I’ve spent on Candance from Tom.
Yes I’m petty 😂 idgaf
This story is fake. A DNA sample swiped off a cup is not going to be proof in court. No way to definitely prove the swipe was from the intended person. Also, there is no such thing as suing to contest a will before the person is dead is not a thing. Finally, there is no requirement for things to go to a jury in Colorado.
Because that’d be a losing battle
@@HighFlySoyGuyNo it wouldn't, it's literally the only reason you can sue for child support.
@@munchiemunchie5226 most men literally do not win those battles and it doesn’t help that he still kept her in his life. It would be a losing battle.
I wasn't aware you could dispute a will when the person was still alive, and in good health.
You shouldn’t be able to. All it takes in court is the person being able to say who they want to leave everything to, and that they are clear of mind and stuff.
That said, I know some places do have laws about having to leave some stuff for family. But it’s a little more specific, and I think that was in Franchise or something. Either way, they shouldn’t have gone to court. And I’m not sure why there was a jury for a case like this.
Yeah in India you nees to distribute your inherited property equally among your children. You can decide what to do with what you earn in your own lifetime but anything you get from parants needs to be evenly distributed. This law was made because up until recently parants didn't give their daughters anything to "keep wealth in family"
@@LinkPizza That's why I don't think this story is a real
@@pollypuffington2243 Yeah, that, plus the collecting the DNA from her glass?? I'm pretty sure if paternity was in question the judge would order a warrant for her DNA.
Additionally, in most, if not all states, if you're on the birth certificate and raised the kid for not only years, but for their entire lives, the law recognizes you as the legal father.
It's actually pretty messed up legally because some people find out their kid isn't theirs while the kid is still a minor but they are still on the hook for child support because they have already been the dad for years.
Unless different states have different rules, a will cannot be contested unless the they are dead. Also, a court cannot change contents of said will unless it can be proven without a doubt that their was fraud/counterfeit or duress. Still after they have died. Contesting a will is one of the hardest things to do and no way a jury trial, especially one that digs up people pasts. I'm fairly gullible but I'm side of this is a fake story
Feel really sorry for the daughter, tbh.
Yes, she was a bad person, but her mother had manipulated her into thinking her dad was the one who cheated, so that would explain why she'd instantly dislike any new woman he was with. Because in her eyes, her dad had "sacrificed" his family, including her, for some other woman.
This is why the dad should have told his daughter the truth. Some parents try too hard to be the "bigger" person, and "shield" the child, not understanding that you're not actually shielding she child, you are just keeping the child vulnerable to be manipulated. That woman was clearly a narcissist, and if you leave your child with a narcissistic parent, they WILL be manipulated and gaslit. His daughter would probably have had a better upbringing if she knew the truth, and knew how to deal with her mother's narcissism. She would have been able to bond with OP as step-mom/daughter, as well as her brother, and been much happier.
I swear, narcissistic parents can ruin kids... And if she one day would no longer be able to use her ex husband as a scapegoat? Then the daughter would be the next in line for abuse.
Yeah, but OP also mentioned that Amelia started poisoning Candace’s mind about Michael, so even if Michael told the truth about Amelia, whose to say that she would still side with her mother on the notion of “mom made a mistake, please don’t leave”.
All in all, I get your point of view.
I agree tbh the daughter came out the worst in this tbh.
@@BrownLove7562 Doesn't matter. One option has 0% chance of success, the other has a chance. Knowing both sides, at least the child has a choice. They might not turn around instantly but the seed is planted, if they're interested they might look back into it years later. Giving up and hiding the truth makes no sense whatsoever.
Parental alienation and manipulation are abuse. They're just not discussed as much because people don't realize the toll they actually take till much later on in life.
I agree. I'm actually shocked she apologized. I just know if she knew about the truth, she'd mostlikely be a good person. But because she was told lies and basically her father never denied it *because she thought he knew* her behavior makes a lot of sense
When your marriage lasted 3 years and the new one 10 years and you still think you have any rights
Lol
I guess in hindsight, him shielding her from the truth meant the daughter will eventually see he had zero faults and that her mother dug her own grave
Well, the daughter already did, after finding out the truth. Plus, she should move to another country (e.g, Australia), disconnect her phone number, delete her social media accounts, in case, her mother bullies her into taking her in.
This is yet another prime example of why paternity tests should be mandatory
I have to agree.
Yep
Proper tests. Meaning multiple of them from different companies. There's chances of false positives and negatives.
This is so important. They have to be mandatory not only for the father and children, but for the mother's sake too. So many women nowadays are like "omg, you want a paternity test?! you don't trust me?". Boom. Mandatory tests also solve this problem. It's just a formality to ensure everyone's safety.,
Likely a fake story. A whole jury trial for a civil dispute involving family law? I mean, jury trials is possible in civil suits, but you have to pay for the jury. Also, "bombshell" DNA test on a jury trial? The results of the exam should've been revealed during the discovery process, and the defense will be launching a motion to dismiss. Why go through the entire court proceeding when you already have DNA evidence that will shut down the case faster than Planet Fitness at 6:58pm on a weekend
I don’t understand how the ex-wife was able to go to court, to try to get the house that clearly wasn’t hers and dispute the husbands will…makes no sense
Anyone can contest a will but that doesn’t mean you’ll win
The mother did in representative of the daughter. The claim wasnt that she was owed the house but because as eldest child the daughter should be granted the house in the will.
The mother did in representative of the daughter. The claim wasnt that she was owed the house but because as eldest child the daughter should be granted the house in the will.
i wonder how they were dragged to court when the husband was still alive.
that's because its a fake story.
"tom didn't want to marry me anymore." If he is the father of candice and she is an adult living alone that is almost 20+ years. He never wanted to marry you.
There needs to be strong legal repercussion if a partner (mainly woman) lies about the paternity of the child to her partner to get money. There should also be legal repercussions if a pregnant woman lies about the paternity of the child in order to get child support. So many people lose a good chunk of their money for 18 years just to have them find out it was all a sham.
There is but judges really dont care. You can sue for paternity fraud but most of the time its a losing case especially if you're married. The husband is automatically listed as husband by default unless you've been legally separated for over 300 days. In some states it doesnt matter if you're divorced, you can still be listed as father by default 300 days after the divorce.
Mainly women? Both parties should be strongly held accountable. Many men have secret families outside of their.ain family. Cheating is bad for both genders
@@Souchi-itobut that’s not paternity fraud that’s lying to your spouse
Someone on another page that posted thus story pointed out how this is fake because § 732.518 of the US Law states one cannot sue for inheritance before the person dies.
Very fake, indeed. Plus, there's no way that such a case could move so fast through the courts.
I was going to say… how do you contest a will before anyone dies?
I’m no lawyer, but I don’t believe a witness, especially as one of the defendants, can offer bombshell evidence that the prosecution was previously unaware of. I’ll admit I don’t know if that’s a federal or state thing, though.
@@angelintodemonseed from the lawyers I spoke to, that bombshell evidence will be highly scrutinized as a forgery, cause why else would you not present it during discovery?
Unless I missed something in this post, it might be from a different country. Not all crazy things happen in the US.
Of course, this would be impossible in my country as well and I don't know any country where this would be possible.
th-cam.com/video/GdeWPAHR3yE/w-d-xo.html
I’m going to go ahead and guess: OP‘s husband is not the biological father of his “daughter“.
Got it in one
Correct madam
@@dr0g_Oakblood Mama always said I was sharp as a marble.
I don't wanna be that guy. But she's still his daughter. Not biologically but emotionally. Tom was clearly never there for her as much as micheal and even when the truth came out she seemed grateful that her father would still pay for her living. This girl needs therapy before she turns into her mother completely.
So at 5:14 "Michael" turns into "John" for a while, and then back to "Michael" again at 5:46. Confused AI is confused while telling confused AI story.
Yes. I noticed. Hahahaha. So it's not a real name.
A jury trial for an inheritance dispute? I thought they’d just meet with the judge
I swear some people doesn't even deserve to live and have no reason to exist... Like Amelia
This story is f'd up, but I don't like how she said that Candance isn't his daughter/real daughter. A parent is the one who raises you and has nothing to do with genes. Shit like this is also just saying to people who adopt and are adopted they are not (really) family. Such a f'd up stance on the world
This story makes no sense, there would not be a trial about the inheritance until the father died. And according to law the spouse can inherit the entire estate without any other considerations.
Yeah. It's clearly fake. The false inheritance battle. Being forced to go to trial when it'd be thrown out in pre-trial. Getting a DNA sample from a cup. The level of detail in general being consistently the same. OP revealing the bombshell instead of any other person revealing it.
Candace was old enough at time of divorce, she should have been told about Amelia's cheating. Kids need to know these things.
Take Amelia to court for all $$ over yrs Micheal paid out.
How old was she at the time of divorce? I was under the impression she was 3 at *best.*
@@angelintodemonseedI feel like as soon as she started getting moody about how op "destroyed the family" that it should've been told. Or at least when she was 13. Sit her down and explain everything with evidence. Dad tried to be the bigger person but instead basically made his daughter more vulnerable.
OP's husband was a fool. His kid got bullied because he wants to shield his 'daughter' from her horrible mom.
Come on now, who doesn't DNA test after catching his wife cheating on him? This is literally the first thing your lawyer advise you to do at least if they are a decent lawyer.
Another day another Lifetime story on Telltales 😂 brought to you by ChatGPT most likely
I'm really sorry for what OP, Micheal, their son went through because of his ex wife, ex best friend, and false daughter. As much as I hate to say this, this happened because Micheal and OP being doormats. Micheal didn't tell the truth to Candace as it only let Amelia manipulate her. Even now, he's not even suing Amelia and Tom for lying to him about Candace. Nor telling Candace to stay away from them, kicking her out and taking back the flat, and making her pay for all the bills he had paid for her. Instead he just told her that she will always be his daughter despite the awful things that she had done. OP should have let her anger go and bring both Amelia and Candace down from their high horses. Guys, don't be doormats and tell the truth to kids. Also, always get dna testing.
Michael maybe, but how is OP a doormat?
@@crowfather0249 it's a new word the internet has learned. They will get tired of it soon.
@@crowfather0249 She let Candice and Amiliea walk all over her and disrespect her.
Idk if the story is fake or not, but just using the events of this story excluding the will stuff, looks like another case where a paternity test at birth would've solved so many issues as not only would he found out he wasn't the father, but also that his wife was a cheater. I understand that some people may have issues with paternity tests as it can show a lack of trust in a relationship, and I do get that if it's happening at birth, this is one of the most emotional times for a mother after 9 months of pregnancy, so to have your partner not trust you at that special moment can hurt. That being said, what also hurts is probably learning the kid you thought was your biological kid never was. For a woman, unless the kid is accidently switched after birth, the child is 100% hers. And if the child was switched, unless the father was a serial cheater in the area at the time of the child's conception, chances are overwhelmingly that he isn't the father either, so it's a shared struggle.
Of course we also get into the birth certificate stuff. I'm sure if it varies state by state, but the way I view it is that it is an important document with a lot of implications of responsibilities, such as the possibility of child support. I like to think of this example. Imagine having a sibling that you have a very good relationship with. Let's say they need a co-signer for a loan. Do you just blindly say yes because you have unconditional love for them? Unless you're a knucklehead, the answer is no. You will ask for all of their financial details, their monthly salary, their spending habits, what the loan will be used for, and what their repayment plan is. The point that I am making is that you do all your homework and get all the details before deciding to put your signature down. That should also be the case for signing a birth certificate where you get all the information necessary before choosing to do so.
Also another thing, but I think making sure to know who the father is at birth should be important for medical history. I find this to be one of the more despicable acts of paternity fraud because what if the biological father comes from a family that has a history of medical issues? You would want to know so that you can be aware and/or even take precautions to try and lower risk of diseases. By committing paternity fraud, it is malicious in that you'd be making assumptions from the non-biological father's medical history when that's not even relevant.
I absolutely, positively, believe ALL births should have mandatory DNA testing. It automatically removes any confusion. During that small moment, it should be a matter of business, making sure that everyone knows the biological origin. Once everything is established, then feelings of trust and loyalty can remain.
@@BrownLove7562 Agree with that. I like when focusing on an issue to try and see the perspective from both sides. In this case, man vs woman. It seems like loss of trust is the main issue on the woman's side, while financial ramifications and paternity uncertainty on the man's side. One definitely is worse than the other...
The idea of it being mandatory sounds nice. It just removes all the stigma/drama as it would just something that is part of the process rather than it sounding accusatory the moment a DNA test is brought up.
It truly does suck that it has come to this, but as the saying goes, "Only a fool learns from his own mistakes. The wise man learns from the mistakes of others". The fact is that we see all these cases of paternity fraud. If we have the methodology to test for it at birth, why shouldn't someone do it? People can bring up trust in the relationship all they want, but I don't think you should put everything into trust for something that can affect you for the rest of your life.
Like another thing I've thought about is that when it comes to this DNA test, I'd say almost all men want it to be POSITIVE. It's not like men are sitting there praying for their DNA test to come back negative and learn that their partner was unfaithful...
it's definitely fake, you can't submit evidence like this to court when it's technically not relevant to the current case, they illegally acquired the DNA of a grown ass woman to do a paternity test and even if the test was legit? he's on the birth certificate and had legal custody of her until she was 18 so she's considered his daughter by legal authority and that paternity test doesn't have any bearing on the case at hand unless it's meant to display criminal behavior and that doesn't matter in a property dispute.
Why are these made up stories ALWAYS so fabulously overindulgent in pointless details and novel-esque descriptions of insignificant circumstances? Is it for padding so that these videos can get upwards of 20-30 minutes in length? Every story is also written in the exact same style (and it's not in a way that normal people write), meaning that if you've heard one you've heard them all.
That or humans really are that repetitive
It's very very AI created. The 'turmoil' the 'whirlwind of emotion,' the same catchphrases. I think it might be to add some minutes too. Also, who would sue for inheritance when the people are still very much alive?
“WHIRLWIND OF ROMANCE” yet another AI generated story lol. At this point just tell the AI not to use that phrase anymore
Okay not saying this isn’t a fake or AI generated story because it likely is but like
Whirl wind of romance is an actual saying so like uhhhhhh what’s your point? I mean what happened to people making typos or maybe just saying shit you’ve never heard anyone say? Also like all of these stories are lifted from Reddit where these typos are usually not present (at least to the same degree) which means what ever AI narrator this channel uses is illiterate as fuck
@@TheOneTrueGhostyBoi my point is it’s an uncommon expression yet it appears in these stories very frequently. It’s clearly a phrase this AI generator likes to use.
For a sec there, I thought this was going to be a bitter story about a widow and ex-wife fighting over a dead man's will only to discover he had lied to all of them and was secretly the jerk
But I was pleasantly surprised at this story where the husband is actually a good man, and the main couple is healthy and supportive towards one another. I was especially pleased that the daughter realized she had been so trash to the new wife after the whole debuckle. Usually, entitled people in these stories are dead set on being a pain in the butt, but she had a lot of courage to admit she was wrong. And the ex-wife got just what was coming to her
Married or not- DNA TESTING SHOULD ALWAYS BE DONE AFTER BIRTH to avoid supporting the wrong kid or putting your name on the birth certificate.
Anyone else kinda hoping OP's husband would have told off his exwife and imaginary daughter Candace to eat $hit and not leave Candace anything including the condo she's living in. I wish he would have sold it and left them both homeless.
While I don't think the daughter is fully innocent, she's a victim in this whole situation as well. She had been lied to her whole life by a woman she thought she could trust completely. The fact that she actually came and apologized to both OP and husband after it was all done shows that she is capable of growth.
Also, husband can't sell daughter's condo. It's in her name. That's why, when the ex-wife showed up, husband said that it was the daughter's choice who does and doesn't live with her. It's the same reason I have no legal power to sell your car
@@CrimpyPlateomfg I'm such a ding dong I forgot that he GAVE IT TO HER. This is where I hope he sued them for fraud. I forgot what the legal term for not my baby not my concern but I want my money back cheating mum.
That's what happens when you push things when you know you're wrong.
This story is so fake.
I’m glad they didn’t cut the daughter off.
Candace certainly needed to know the truth.
This person needs to work on their creative writing
This story can't be real because Op's husband is not dead. There is no lawsuit that would go court about conditions of living and non ill person's Will. Also a dna test done like that would be inadmissible. The husband also raised the daughter and signed the birth certificate So even if she's not biologically his he's still legally her father even if she's an adult.
This is why you don't lie to your kids.
While he spent years trying to preserve his worthless ex-wife's image that woman literally made him out to be the bad guy.
let's go through a horrible, brutal jury trial over the inheritance of the house and then when we win after a movie-like plot twist, let's sell said house to put some distance between us and the drama.
I fell bad for everyone except amilia. Tom less so but none for amilia.
How can you sue to get rid of a person out of a will when the one who made the will still alive and healthy ?
alright, so i'm doubtful that you can just secretly collect someone's dna and test it legally
Fake story. This is impossible in the USA. There’s no right of the ex to make a claim on the husbands home and it would be tossed out as “failure to state a claim”
Have you ever thought that maybe not all these stories are from the usa?
@@sammara3218they live in colorado
Pretty sure this isn't how trials work...
I feel terrible for this family, and i hope they can grow from this experience and become stronger than before and learn to bond with eachother
Who is Micheal and John? I think OP messed up
Michael turned into john
12:58 bruh why do you wonder if youre the AH after telling us about your marriage, your husband's daughter, and the court case? (which suspiciously is written like a Lifetime movie). How braindead do you have to be to ask that question because some of your family/friends dont agree on how you handled the situation?
Also why would Michael give Candance his savings when there hasnt been a single sentence of her being a kind or good person? And im pretty sure you cant contest the will until after he dies or something lol.
Edit: imagine going to court to make sure that you and your son will inherit the house only for your husband's ex to bother you and your husband so much you decide to sell the house and move to a different city. She kind of won in a way. At least Candace turned around and apologized to them.
As a Coloradan, we try not to claim people like Amelia
Another AI.. Sigh
Well leave then
I had known him forever 😂
NUMBER ONE MISTAKE of cheated on spouses:
"" "shielding" " their children.
Stupid and naive...
Candace is a grown ass adult she brought this on herself. I’d be going after the mom for all those child support payments as the kid wasn’t his.
ALWAYS TELL THE CHILDREN THE TRUTH. Don't let the cheater twist their minds because you want to be a "better person". . . . No.
Honestly, I feel sorry for OP, Michael, Nick and Candance. Candance was literally fully manipulated by her mother, which is sad. I’m glad she saw through her lies in court, but the damage to OP, Michael and Nick was already done by then. Imagine your “daughter” hating on you all of her entire life because she thought you were the one who cheated. Such a nasty woman his ex-wife was…
What a cute story! Emphasis on "story".
IRL, the moment it was known that Candace was Tom's daughter, the defense attorney would have demanded the case be dismissed, and Amelia would have been sued for fraud.
The will would have to be rewritten because it was drafted based on false information and was therefore invalid.
In what country can you sue for an inheritance when the person is STILL alive??? Jury trial? Hearsay? unofficial DNA test? I would really like to know which country allows all this.
In all this turmoil, the love that Michael's new wife feels for him stands out like a giant. after everything she endured and supported, for the love of her family she was willing to give up the job she appreciated so much. the ex deserves total misery, and this is said by someone who makes forgiveness a mantra, but it is shocking for how much and how the ex manipulated the lives of 3 people. tom, michael and their daughter 3 lives marked. I would be curious to know Candice's fate, will she reconnect with her father? and will Tom have a relationship with his biological daughter?.
Amelia is a horrible human being. Candace isn't much better, but it does suck that she was lied to and manipulated her entire life. Michael seems like a really good guy, as does his wife, and it's good of him to still consider Candace his daughter. I'm wondering why he didn't question paternity directly after finding her cheating. Anyways, I wish them the best.
This story is made up. So they are challenging Michael's Will... whilst he's still alive?!?
Whoever made this story up didn't think it through
Why are people so unsure of doing the right thing with conviction? Nta...
Amelia sux, Tom sux, and candy well sux to be her
Even without the dna proof, they weren’t gonna win lol! 😂
I'm not sure how many others feel about Candice, with her mothers manipulation and her "father" sorta allowing it to happen, she was more of a pawn for her mother to use against her ex-husband. Feel like if Candice grew up with the knowledge of her mothers infidelity then there would not have been any arguments or even a case against the Dad, she might've actually gotten along with OP and been a great older sister/baby-sitter to OP's kid
This story is full of legal nonsense. Amelia had no claim to the house if Michael "owned it". She only owns things that are community property (property acquired, assets earned, etc), that she herself also has ownership of. If she doesn't own it, then it's likely premarital anyway.
This is partial Michael's fault for not discussing why they divorced. The mom was able to twist it around to make Michael the bad guy. And she did just that. You can talk to your kids in age appropriate ways guys.
After listening to the whole story I can only feel sorry for Candance. She was weaponized by her mother, thus turning her into a venomous cruel snake, just to find out she’s been living a lie her whole life. What in Candance’s eyes was seeking retribution for the supposed wrongdoings of her father, was in reality just a tool for Amelia’s bitterness. I seriously hope OP will try to build a bridge with Candance for the last time; although, I wouldn’t blame her for not wanting to do so. Certainly, there was no justification for Candance’s abuse towards OP and her little boy, but now that her world was burned to the ground she can be a force for the making of a new one.
The only thing Candice was worried about was Daddy cutting off the money pipeline
Yeah I would've sued Amelia for paternity fraud, but I'd forgive Tom because the worst thing he did was the affair.
Something doesn’t add up in this one. You can’t just bust out some crazy revealing information in court. This is not a tv show. There are rules of discovery that must be followed and rules that allow testimony and evidence to be entered.
this is a great dramatization but there's some weirdness that makes me think this is fake:
1)there is no dramatic reveals of evidence in real life court. all evidence is introduced in discovery and any new evidence has to be presented to opposing counsel and evaluated by a judge for admissibility.
2) you'd have to be a moron to sue without a case like this
Paternity fraud needs to be punishable. Especially if both biological parents knowing deceive an innocent father
Ex needs to return all money, which op's husband payed for college, apartment
This story sounds u realistic af.. Once they divorced the ex wife had no claims to the house. That wouldve been thrown out immediately. Fake story
I feel horrible for Candace
Why the 1st daughter always seen as horrible by the stepmom
I hope micheal and candance still have a loving relationship ❤
Im feeling sorry for Michael, these women fought for their "future" and Michael's will and the man is still alive like wtf
In what world do you need a jury for a civil inheritance trial? And what court would permit a random unrequested DNA test to be submitted as evidence?
NTA they came at you aggressively, so she deserved to find out the truth like that.
side note: pleae counter sue amelia for any amount of child support you had to pay for candice. since u didnt know she wasnt ur daughter, the court system in ur first divorce wouldve made u not pay child support on the grounds that your divorce wouldve been started by finding out her parentage.
Why are the OPs always concerned about what the neighbors think? Also, Michael should change his will to give his savings account to his son. Candace is not a nice person.
The ex doesn't seem to realize how badly she's screwed herself. If they chose to he could sue for 18 years of child support plus parental alienation and has a pretty open and shut case. I understand wanting to be free of the drama however it's something to threaten her with.
this doesn't make any sense. Michael is still alive, and as long as he leaves a well written will, he could leave everything to the neighborhood hobo legally. Candice never had any right to sue them, especially while Michael was alive to state his wishes.
Also, the fact that she turned out not to be his makes this story reek of fake.
Why did op suggest moving out
Now he won't be able to visit his daughter
Clearly op doesn't want her husband want to be in contact with her daughter
I give pretty much everyone on Reddit the benefit of the doubt and believe nearly everyone, but this is, without a doubt, the most BS story I have ever heard on Reddit that wasn't about getting laid.
obviously fake.
yall arrive in court and the Judge asks Mike 'what do you want to do with your will?' and mike says 'oh the house goes to my son' *case closed*
Is the fathers will. They don’t have a right to it in the first place. Its HIS stuff, and who he decides to give it to is HIS choice. Nobody has a say in it but him.
So fake... evidence cannot just he introduced like that, it's not a fucking movie.
imagine being so greedy you ended not getting the one you desperately wanted - cause you un-intentionally opened a "secret-box" you hid a long long time ago.. LOL
Michael should sue Amelia for every penny he spent on the affair child. And she should be kicked out of the house he bought her (hopefully its in his name).
said it before and imma say it again:
paternity fraud needs to be made illegal, fines and jail time, plus paying back all the child support
I'm anticipating that she's not his daughter. I thought he knew, but got surprised for the confession part. 😂
The entire plot ends up being invalidated by the end!
"Yeah we fought a court battle to never let go of this house but the ex showed up once so we selling and moving!"
Lol its all about the money even current wife cares more about financial security that her husband
There's no way this is true. It sounds like a TV show. I mean, c'mon. Lmao
amelia literally poisoned candace all her life only bc she was petty about the house. it's crazy how karma came back to bite her so hard she became homeless.
It all start because an ex and her child want to be greedy, and it all fall apatt. Miracously, the child end up changing for the better because of it.