Floodgates & Handtraps do neat things | Answering YOUR Ruling Questions (EP. 8)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024
- ► Check me out on Twitch: / distantcoder
► Join my Discord Server: / discord
► If you wish to support me further, here is a link to my Patreon where you can earn special supporter benefits: / distantcoder
► VISIT CARDBRAWLERS AT cardbrawlers.c... ! Don't forget to use promo code CODER5 for 5% discount on all your orders !
►VISIT IMPERIUM DUELIST AT www.imperiumdu... ! Don't forget to use promo code CODER10 for 10% discount on all your orders !
------------------------------
Music from Crypt of the NecroDancer soundtrack & Lakey Inspired
(dbsoundworks.b...)
( / lakeyinspired )
------------------------------
Video Edited By: HeyBudLetsPlay
------------------------------
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.83[1/2] เปิดแคมป์หลอนต้อนรับ 2 ตัวพ่อแห่งวงการผี!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2uPuHYHgwiI/mqdefault.jpg)
Say I have Lost World out and my opponent has a Jurraegg Token on his field, why did my father leave me?
He went to get some yugioh packs and got kidnapped by rare hunters.
@@hoyl700 damn now I have to go on a journey to become king of games to rescue him
U to huh? Wanna be friends to find our dads KEKW
That would be cuz you're playing dinos.
@@Rizwaan122 fair
Hi Coder, I have a ruling question: I was having a live duel today at locals, and when I tried to use the heart of the cards to pull at pieces of exodia from my side deck to my hand my opponent said I was cheating? Can you explain to them the rulings around using the heart of the card during duels
Just tell them you have a spirit chilling somewhere.
Hello Mr. Coder, I have a Token question and sorry if it’s dumb: Once a card like, say, Nibiru, summons a token and defines its stats, what is considered to be the card giving those stats: the Nibiru or the token itself? And if you were, for example, to mass-negate the board (with a card like Hi-Speedroid Kitedrake or Skill Drain), would the token lose its stats? I guess the root question is, are a token’s stats under any circumstances treated as a part of its own effect? Thanks :)
I think nibiru actual states on the item card that it gives the token it's atk/def x of the monsters tributed with a mass negation I keeps the atk/def only thing that lower it's atk/def is like droplits etc I believe I may be wrong
@@akamelegendery5703 droplet only works on effect monsters. The token is a normal monster
Since the nibiru eff has resolved then even if you negate the nibiru on field with like skill drain or kitedrake the token still has its atk and def because it is an effect that already has resolved so it stays like this
Reading nibiru fully states that the token is a normal monster, not an effect monster. This should solve that question lol.
Nibiru summons the token while it's still in the hand then summons itself the only way to stop it is with a monster negate that affects the hand like mind drain or a negating an activated effect like how crystal wing does. In which case no monsters are tributed, no tokens are summoned and nibiru doesn't hit the field. Since they are all part of the same effect if one cannot be done the rest can't be done so if a floodgate is on the field nibiru because a brick in the hand even though it tributes everything you can't activate it because you can't summon a rock so you don't get to resolve any effects because a singular one is being stopped and they all have to resolve together.
Binging rn all "Answer your Ruling" vids to refresh my knowledge on cards and wordings, and noticed an interesting trend xD Ep 1 started prim and propper (only 3 yo atm) and in Ep 8 (about a year ago atm) Coder became the goofball we all know and love #nohomo xD
So gozen will now be a staple/side deck tech in plunders? neat
Nah plunders also need different attributes for themselves
It's kind of backwards for what the deck is trying to accomplish sadly
@@cbrycem Yeah I just realised that unfortunately.
@@netcat22 if it worked like that, it would've been so cool though
Interesting ruling Question (will never occur in competitive matches tho):
So, Five-headed dragon states that it Cannot be destroyed by battle with a DARK, EARTH, WATER, FIRE, or WIND monster.
and Elemental Hero Electrum (a LIGHT attribute monster) states that while it is face-up on the field, it is also WIND, WATER, FIRE, and EARTH-Attribute.
So assuming I get my Electrum to higher ATK than Five-headed dragon, would Electrum be able to destroy it as LIGHT attribute, or would its effect as being other attributes that Five-headed dragon cannot be destroyed with not allow Electrum to destroy it.
Hope you answer this one!
Elctrum can't destroy FGD since, while he does have the attribute that can destroy FGD, he also has others that explicitly can't.
Cards will multiple atributes act at the same time with regards to effects for example if you summon dark simorgh and flip gozen match the dark simorgh goes to the gy because while it is a monster with one attribute on the field it is also a monster with another attribute on the field so gozen match kills the dark simorgh that is wind while not caring about the dark simorgh that is dark and because they are both the one and the same card then like a rule of thumb does care + kill = death like multiplying a negative with a positive gives you a negative also being dark does not protect you from gozen match because there is not text that says so even if there was gozen match affects the player and not the monster. So regarding five headed dragon it is protected by battle against earth and electrum is earth so it doesn't die because that's the only effect happening. Even though five headed dragon can be killed by divine, dark and light monsters or any new attribute added into the game the reason it can't be killed is a conditional effect and as long as you meet the right conditions you will receive the effect.
Hey Coder, I was wondering what would happen if my opponent were to negate the fusion or link summon of a Prank kids monster, would the monsters used for the summon of the fusion or link be able to activate their effects, or are they considered to only be sent to the GY
As far as i know, prank-kids need to use a spell effect to fusion summon. So the fusion summoned would be external special summon and so only the card/effect could be negated but not the fusion summon itself.
Pankratops is summoned and used by player A . Player B summons the pankratops later that turn to their side of the field . Can player B use pankratops eff? Is this different than mind controlling a drident who already used its effect previously that turn?
Pankratops' effect is once per turn, per player. Drident is once per turn, per that copy.
Sidoremichord Beautea has the following effect:
(Quick Effect): You can target 1 Effect Monster your opponent controls, or, if you have an even Pendulum Scale in your Pendulum Zone, you can target 1 face-up Spell/Trap they control instead; this turn, if that card would leave the field, banish it instead.
I activate the effect of my Mekk-Knight Purple Nightfall, targeting a Mekk-Knight Blue Sky I control. If my opponent activates Sidoremichord Beautia, targeting that Blue Sky, what happens?
Also
My opponent controls [S-Force Edge Laser]. If I activate Tri-Brigade Revolt to summon 3 monsters, would I be allowed to summon one of the monsters in the same column as Edge Laser and then not perform the link summon?
There is like a hidden text with card effects when you move a card off of the field it is always considered under leaving the field so regardless of what purple was going to do with the card after removing off of the field it is now forcibly banished by beautea effect at the targetting process and not by purple's effect so you don't get to resolve purple's effects so you don't get to search or return the card in the next standby.
Hi DistantCoder, I got a ruling question that I tried to ask around but could not get a concrete answer, I am really looking to hear your opinion.
My friend had a Archlord Kristya face-up on the field, I used VW Gate Qinglong to negate its effect, then I later proceed to summon Shenshen and used Chuche's effect to successfully destroy Kristya.
Kristya has an Unclassified Effect that reads: "If this face-up card would be sent from the field to the GY, place it on top of the Deck, instead.", and Shenshen has a Continuous Effect that reads: "Any card sent from the field to the GY is banished instead.". Just where should Kristya go? Top of the deck or banished?
Someone on yugioh101 had pointed out Kristya had two conflicting ruling: one where against Macro Cosmos Kristya would return to top of the deck, and another one against Mystical Beast of Serket Kristya would be banished...
I am so very very confused. Not only do I wish to know the correct answer, if the reasoning behind it can be provided as well that would be great!
The Macro Cosmos ruling and Mystical Beast of Serket rulings aren't really conflicting; the effects read differently. Shenshen reads like Macro Cosmos, and according to the Cosmos ruling, Kristya will return to the top of the deck.
For the Xyz and D Fissure, how would it work with Redoer? As you beed to specifically detach a monster for one of his effects. Does he check after the cards are in the grave?
It's still a xyz material, so it goes to the gy.
Notice in the text it says depending on detach once the card is no longer attached it regains it's previous status you can detach the card while macro cosmos is on the field and the card gets banished and redoer still retains his effects the only difference between macro cosmos and dimensional fissure is the dimensional fissure needs specifically a monster card as in if you destroy a monster that is face up as an equipped spell card or the card is a monster on the field but is considered to still be a trap those don't get banished.
AT LAST THE ANSWER HAS BEEN FOUND!!!!! Thanks so much!!!!!
If i activate a trap during my opponent’s turn, I have multi and my opponent has amazement admin. Admin is cl-1 and Multi is cl-2 in response to the resolution of my trap. Can my opponents admin equip a trap onto multi?
No. Arlekino was not on the field when Multifaker was summoned.
@@VyaxUltima multi will be on field when arlekino is summoned. It is the last thing to happen in the chain
@@cbrycem and? Arlekino requires a monster to have been summoned while it was already face-up on the field.
@@VyaxUltima my bad dude damn, I didn't mean to @ you in that one.
@@cbrycem ah, I see. No worries then.
I feel like you should still be allowed to strike the pendulum summon of just Solfachord monsters and their summons would just not be negated in the same way that you can still legally attempt to negate a fusion spell under meltdown or attempt to destroy a dragoon via card effect.
Not arguing, but it would make sense if the rulings worked the same, unless there's something I'm missing
My opponent controls Number 3: Cicada King and Metalfoes Orichalc. I control Samurai Destroyer and have a set copy of Crystron Entry. My opponent attacks SD with Orichalc. Before the damage step, I activate Entry, summoning Citree and Rion. Citree's effect targets a level 2 in my GY and summons Crystron Quandax. Rion's effect targets that now banished level 2 and summons Crystron Ametrix. In response to the Ametrix on summon effect, I activate Quandax's effect and summon Crystron Phoenix. Ametrix's effect resolves and switches Orichalc to defense position. In the next chain, I activate Phoenix's on summon effect.
Is the Orichalc still considered to be attacking at this point? This affects whether or not Cicada King's effect can be used to negate Phoenix's banish. I ask because the game doesn't check for a replay until triggers are finished resolving.
Ruling Question:
If i have Gozen Match and Whitebeard, the Plunder Patroll Helm equipped with Emblem of the Plunder Patroll, while i have a Dark and a Water monster in my grave. Can i activate Emplem effect to SS Moerk from the extra? Im asking cause Emblem can be legally activated here cause I could summon Black Beard with it, but then the Whitebeard is equiped to the monster I summon from the extra, so i dont control a Water monster anymore.
Whitebeard would get equipped after the summon. So the only legal summon when Emblem resolves is Blackbeard.
you can summon any attribute that is in the grave or on the opponent's field, even if that isn't water, you do need to have Blackbeard in the Extra deck
soo I have a very relevant question: If I control an Abyss Dweller face-up on my field as well as a DNA transplant, with which I called DIVINE on activation and a Gozen Match on. In my Graveyard I have an Elementsaber Lapauila and activate its effect to change its attribute to DIVINE. I then proceed to Special Summon it from the Graveyard using a card like Monster Reborne. Which card will apply first on the reborned monster? Gozen Match or DNA Transplant?
In other words, will the Elementsaber monster be sent to the Graveyard, as the Attribute change stopps applying outside the Graveyard?
if something like redoer or omega are summoned from the extra deck, and then use their effects to banish themselves and return later, would they still be considered special summoned when cards like shaddoll fusion check? I know their return isn't a summon but I guess what I'm asking is if the game still recognizes the original way they hit field
I'm pretty sure that a card clears itself of markers such as "special summoned" when it stops being face up on the field, similar to how flipping a Call of the Haunted summon face down "detaches" it. I could be wrong, but I think an Omega that re-enters the field by its own effect is no longer technically considered special summoned.
Why does imperial order send equipped plunder monsters to the graveyard? Trying to wrap my head around this one. Does it work similarly for monsters like dragunity?
Only plunder's that equip themselves will be send to GY. For example if you use Blackbeard on bluebeard and imperial order is flipped up, the bluebeard stays equipped because the effect that keeps it equipped is the monster effect of Blackbeard. But if the Blackbeard targeted itself it will be sent to GY, as the effect that keeps it equipped is now negated (as Blackbeard is now treated as a spell).
Can I use champions vigilance to negate and destroy red eyes dragoon while I have blue eyes white dragon on the field?
Hey Coder,
Lets say i summoned my opponents Topologic Zeroboros with Monster Reborn and Zeroboros effect triggers- will he summon himself to the fiel with his effect again? What side of the field will he summon himself to? Or will he just stay banished?
Hi coder, ruling question:
My opponent controls a linkuriboh and a altergeist kunquery and has a face up personal spoofing and a face up protocol. I Attack with a Monster, my opponent in chain of the Attack declaration activate spoofing shuffling into the deck the face up kunquery; then he adds a kunquery. I proceede to perform a replay. Is my opponent allowed to activate the kunquery in hand to negate the attack?
A replay is not declaring an attack, it is only choosing a new attack target.
@@VyaxUltima thx man :)
Notes have beem taken !!
Question about the amazement traps. If I choose to activate the effect of 1 of my attraction traps while it is equipped to my amazement monster and I chain the effect of amazement Comica to equip the trap to a monster my opponent controls, which effect of the attraction trap happens?
Also if I have an attraction trap equipped to my amazement Comica, can I use the effect of Comica to equip the trap to my opponents monster if that monster cannot be targeted?
Hey Coder, say i have 0 cards in hand, can i still activate virtual world gate - xaunwu from my graveyard to reborn my monster?
Fire King High Avatar Garunix and Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys, their revival effects and how if you have multiples of them in the graveyard you do not have to chain them and how you get to activate them at any point during the standby as long as it is its own chain. Also how do they resolve in regards to priority if both players have them going off on the same standby phase.
You do not have to chain them together because phase-specific trigger effects function differently from normal trigger effects. They're similar to ignition effects in that regard.
Still waiting for psy-frame driver in under a minute
2 part question. If Tri-brgate Omen tries to banish Spirt Dragon. But Spirt Dragon tags out for Moonlight Dragon. Does moonlight Dragon still get to bounce back Omen off its effect in the same chain or can omen just choose to banish moonlight since it wasn't able to banish Spirt? Thank you.
Shuraig chooses what to banish when it resolves. So if Spirit Dragon summons Moonlight as CL2, then Shuraig as CL1 can banish Moonlight.
Does the same ruling for apply with Necrovalley for the pendulums under dimension shifter
Necrovalley doesn't affect that interaction.
8:00 What if my opponent counters by trying to change my monsters type? Which changing ability would apply first?
Hi coder ruling question
If i have a apollousa with 2400 atk and i activate orcust knightmare, target the apollousa and send gizmek orochi giving apollousa a 800atk boost then negate a monster effect will apollousa still lose the 800atk boost in the end phase?
If you activate the effect of Serpentine Princess on deck and your opponent chains the effect of Herald Ultimateness to negate could you chain Ash to Herald, since it would destroy a card in deck and send it to the GY?
Hey man hope ur good. Quick question regarding tri-brigade shuraig. If my opponent activates revolt summoning four monsters (4 tri-brigade) linking into shuraig. Opponent activates shuraig (trigger effect) and starts chains, shuraig cl1, and I end the chain with super poly using shuraig and another monster I control. Does shuraig still have the ability to banish one card since it left the “trigger zone” that u mentioned in another video?
This isn't a scenario with Shuraig being removed from the location where its trigger effect must activate before it can activate. Here, the effect has already activated, so there's no reason it won't resolve, even if Shuraig has left the field by that time. Granted, there are monsters like Zombie Master that have the clause , in which case yeah, the effect wouldn't resolve.
Another question I have, is about the Dragunity effect monsters. For Dragunity knight gar derg why is it considered not a once per turn?
It's a "soft" once per turn effect if the card doesn't have the phrase "You can only use this card's effect once per turn". Thus if you can summon another copy of it or reborn your monster (with a soft once per turn clause) then you can use it's effect again.
Rueling Question
If I control Arrival Cyberse @Ignister and my opponent attaks it with Borrelsword Dragon how do they interact?
Borrelsword will gain half the attack, but arrival cyberse will not lose any attack.
@@kawaiimercenary ok thanks
It seems that Naturia Rosewhip isn't like El Shaddol Winda, in that if an opponent has previously activated Spells/Traps; they can still activate 1 more. Is this right? If so, why is this? The only difference seems to be that Winda must be face-up first.
Both Winda and Rosewhip only start applying after they are faceup on the field.
So question, say you have an effect monster or continuous spell card with the effect that states "all monsters you control must attack on your turn." and you have an Obelisk the Tormentor on the field and use his effect to purge your opponent's monsters from their side of the field at the cost of him being able to attack that turn. Would the other card's effect make him able to attack regardless because the effect does not target him specifically but all monsters I control? I've been wondering that.
most effects, that force you to attack, say explicitly 'must attack, if able'. In other words a monster, that is prevented from attacking by a card effect (being its own or the effect of a seperate card) it cannot attack due to such an effect (for example "Battle Mania" or "All-Out Attacks")
i have a question: Revived King Ha Des VS Madolche Puddingcess. When Ha Des attacks Puggingcess will Puddingcess be able to destroy a card on the field??
After damage calculation is after the monster has been destroyed. Puddingcess will not be shuffled into deck and will not activate its effect.
If you kaiju a link summon Mekk night aviermax do you still get it’s a effect to shuffle a card on the field. Also we have the same tattoo of lucario and that’s freaking awesome!!
Yes, it's still "by your card". Avramax doesn't say by card effect. So even if you send avramax by game mechanics, it's still by your card.
What makes the ruling for attempting to negate on Solfachord (5:33), different from the rulling for Meltdown (attempting to negate a card that would fusion summon)?
It just is. Negating summons and negating card effects is different.
Basically how summoning works is like this if it is not an inherent summon like pankatrops you have to 1. Attempt to summon -> 2. response -> 3. successfully summon -> 4. response So basically meltdown protects your from the first and second responses of your opponent if you fusion summon while the high scale solfachord only protects solfachord monsters from not being successfully summoned. If it's an inherent summon you skip to successfully summon -> response
If my opponent has zombie world up, and I have mu beta fafnir with some drytrons as material, am I allowed to use the attached drytrons as ritual material for meteonis drytron or are they not considered machines?
Attached materials are not on the field, so Zombie World wouldn't change their monster type. Yes, you can.
Okay so let's say I have there can be only one face up on the board, and I activate a rivalry of the warlords, do both effects restrict the field simultaneously, or does one effect over take the other based on activation order?
They will both apply their effects. You will only be able to control one monster of a type, and only control one type.
Ruling question : if my opponent has a zombie world up, can I activate tribrigade revolt when I have 4 banished tribrigade monsters to try to summon shuraig the ominous omen? I'm confused because they aren't zombies when they are banished but they'll be zombies when they hit the field
The monsters will be summoned, and will become Zombie immediately after. Since Zombie monsters don't qualify to be Shuraig materials, the summon will not be performed.
you cannot activate tribrigade revolt, because the monsters in the graveyard are zombies, and revolt only allows you to summon Beast, Beast-Warrior, and/or Winged Beast monsters, in addition you also have to be able to perform the link summon, if you cannot link summon using only those monsters, you cannot activate revolt, and if a card that prevents summoning from the extra deck is applied mid chain, you don't apply the effect of revolt and you don't summon a monster at all.
@@ScorpioneOrzion If you read his question more carefully, you'd know he's referring to banished monsters, upon which Zombie World doesn't apply. Also, I don't see how the latter part of your comment is relevant to his question.
@@corebren2510 you need to link summon to be able to activate revolt, so in cause of zombie world you cannot activate it, because there is no tribrigate monster that uses only zombies
@@ScorpioneOrzion Actually you can link summon bearbrumm under zombie world, but my question is can I attempt to summon shuraig under zombie world when I have 4 banished tribrigade
Hi Coder, ruling about De-Fusion: I fusion summon using Trick Clow wich then SS itself from grave, if I lik it away could I use De-Fusion to SS that trick clown and the other monster from grave?
That Trick Clown is not considered the same one used for a Fusion Summon.
Can you use rise to full heights first effect on a monster with 0 defence?
Yo! Ruling question!
My opponent activates Super Poly, using my two Dark monsters to fusion summon for a Starving Venom. After the summon, I activate De-Fusion, targeting the Starving Venom on my opponent's side of the field. When it resolves, do I get to summon back my monsters that have been used as fusion material?
Why not?
No, you cannot. The materials for Starving Venom are "2 DARK monsters on the field". The monsters in the GY do not match that.
@@VyaxUltima doesn't matter they were still fusion materials, so you do get to summon them, nevermind starving venom does get returned but no other monsters get summoned
If I special summon a Madolche Pettingcesseour and it's effect to special summon a Madolche from the deck gets Ashed, would I then be able to summon non-Madolches or am I still locked due to Pettingcesseour's effect?
Locking into Madolche monster is part of the effect. so in this scenario you will be able to summon non-Madolche monster.
What happens if I activate a pend scale/ say Qliphort scout and my opponent uses time thief retrograde in response to attach that material to time thief redoer, is the qliphort scout under redoer considered a spell or a monster? Since retrograde specifically negates a spell.
Keep up the work Kevin and great job mr editor sorry I forgot your.
My opponent has successfully resolve misc, are their dinos effected by my face up lair of darkness since it’s a continuous effect applying the dark attribute? If so, can I them tribute a dino for cost for Lilith effect?
I think so because cost can always be paid
Quite sure they are affected if even fog blade works
It is depending on timing. If you used for example during your opponent's main phase you activated demise of the land to activate lair of darkness after misc has been already resolved then no they are not dark until it's the battlephase in which case they turn dark because the protection is removed. Misc does not cleanse pre-existing effects and only stops new ones from occuring as in it stops the resolution of an activated effect during the main phase however field spells have re-applying effects always will try to re-apply themselves so you can tribute them during the battlephase as a cost for lilith.
@@Balila_balbal_loki dude, lair isn't an activated eff but a continous one, it still works
@@Balila_balbal_loki so many words just to be completely incorrect.
Stream this LCS round. It's gonna happen in minutes, Coder
Hey Coder,
If I activate dogmatika punishment and my opponent negates it with hot red or the target is gone, am I still locked out of the extra deck?
You are not. That is part of Punishment's effect.
Edit: if the target leaves, you are locked. If it is negated, you are not.
If I use the effect of Myutant ST-46 to banish a trap monster, such as Shapesister, would I be able to summon Myutant Beast, Myutant Arsenal, or would I be able to choose between the two?
only the Myutant Arsenal, its a trap when its bannished
If I use amazement coaster to add arlekino. Does arlekino special itself? I was thinking it functions like the Multifaker +spoofing interaction
No. Cyclo-Coaster adding an Amazement is not activating a Trap, it's activating the effect of a Trap. Arlekino would not trigger.
Spoofing + Multifaker only works if you activate the effect of Spoofing alongside the initial activation of the card itself.
@@VyaxUltima yeah, and coaster isn't like spoofing. With spoofing you can use the effect when you activate it. But you can't do that with the coaster (which is why amazement cards all suck).
Ruling question:
If a pend monster is put under time thief redoer as material, would it be treated as a monster or a spell
It is a monster.
Pendulum monsters only ever treat themselves as Spells while they are scales.
Hi coder, I have a ruling question for you. Can I tribute a set earth-machine monster to activate the effect of infinitrack brutal dozer? Love your content, keep up the work🙌🏻🙌🏻
We can tribute a set monster for Icarus attack so I don't see why we can't for brutal dozer
@@quelqunx7470 i thought so but i am not sure
Btw thanks
If my opponent activates the effect of Nibiru, the Primal Being in hand and I chain the field effect of Trickstar Reincarnation to it, does Nibiru tribute everything and then fail to summon itself or does it not resolve any part of its effect?
Option 1: Nibiru tribute everything and then fail to summon itself
I thought you can still attempt to negate cards, effects and summons that are protected by an effect that prevents the negation!?
Cards and effects, yes. Summons, no.
If I activate forbidden scripture to a monster with a "?" Atk like apollousa does it make it 0 or the atk it gained by its effect?
Apollousa's effects are negated first. Its ATK becomes 0.
I thougt misc protects only against monster eff? What do i know
Hi coder. if i have Nekroz of unicore/skill drain on board and my oppenent activated prank-kids doodle-doo to tribute for cost and then get 2 prank-kids card to hand do they still get the effect? I have heard that it does but if i use veiler/imperm on it it does not resolve its tribute eff please explain why
for unicore and drain they are only negates as öong as they are on field
If I have Lair of Darkness and Lilith on the field, can I tribute an opponent’s monster for cost who is unaffected by monster effects (such as Infinitrack Fortress Megaclops)? Thank you
Yes, since Megaclops isn't being affected by any monster's effect, it's being Tributed for a cost.
Bear in mind if the monster is unaffected by _Spell_ effects, Lair cannot apply the effect to Tribute the opposing monster.
Lair effects the monster, not the monster itself
Hi coder, i have a ruling question
Does drawing a card for turn count as adding a card to the hand in the case of Generaider boss stage
Drawing for turn adds a card from the Main Deck to the opponent's hand. You can use Boss Stage there.
Generaiders would be kinda shit if Drawing for turn didnt count lol.
Hi i have a ruling question.
Divine Evolution vs. Uneffected Monster (like Ultimate Falcon) Can i out a Uneffected Monster like Raidraptor Ultimate Falcon wuth Divine Evolution‘s send Effect?
Yes. It isn't your effect that would try to affect the monster, but rather your opponent taking a mandatory action.
What happens when I normal summon blackwing harmattan and have black whirlwind on the field with no targets in my deck? And additionally what would happen if I realise it after looking into my deck and have no blackwing with less atk?
Well, with no targets in deck Black Whirlwind cannot be activated. And if you did not have a legal card to add when you activated it, the activation of Whirlwind's effect was illegal and a judge should be called.
Not really a ruling question but still a question because im new. Even tho it id banned can i concede before my opponent attacks with victory dragon
You can surrender at any time.
Such a Good video
If I control FA Whip Crosser at level 7 so it has its floodgate effect. Can my opponent activate lithosagym in hand to destroy a baby and misc in hand to get a misc in grave or could they not do that because whip crosser effect?
Lithosagym doesn't fall under the category of effects Whip Crosser prevents.
Another ruling Question: Can I special summon Evil Dragon Ananta from my GY with Monster Reborn, when I banishing all other Reptile Typ Monster from my Field and GY?
Definitely not. Ananta summon condition means that you can summon it from your HAND by banishing and only summoned this way.
@@tanngrisnir6089 Where is the Condition? Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set. Must be Special Summoned by banishing all Reptile monsters you control and in your GY. This card's ATK/DEF become the number of monsters banished for its Special Summon x 600. Once per turn, during your End Phase: Target 1 card on the field; destroy that target.
@@fanofanimeyu-gi-oh5414
Condition: Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set.
(Summoning) Condition: Must be Special Summoned by banishing all Reptile monsters you control and in your GY.
Continious Effect: This card's ATK/DEF become the number of monsters banished for its Special Summon x 600.
Activation Condition: Once per turn, during your End Phase:
Cost: Target 1 card on the field;
Effect: destroy that target.
If I control a cockadoodledoo and I summon breaksword to a zone points to and destroy my cockadoodledoo can I activate thunder hand's effect in my hand to summon itself or does my opponent have to have a card on their field
The destruction is mandatory. Your opponent must control a card.
Hello Mr coder i have a rulinv question so i have a necrovalley activated and on the next turn my opponent activate magical meltdown and he try to fusion summon how it will resolves because necrovalley prevent player from banishing but magical meltdown fusion summon cannot be negated
you fusion summon as normal, this same interaction is with subterror fiendess + subterror final battle 4th effect, even while skill drain or necrovalley is in effect, you can still summon a subterror monster from your graveyard
Hey coder! Ruling question here: if i have a Number 23: Lancelot, Dark Knight of the Underworld on my side of the field with materials, would Lancelot's mandatory negate effect apply to my opponent sending Miscellaneousaurus to the graveyard? Thanks and i appreciate this type of content a ton!!
Number 23's effect would immediately be chained to the effect of Miscellaneousaurus, as Misc is another monster's activated effect.
@@VyaxUltima thats what i thought, just wanted to make sure. Thanks for the help!
If you detach a sangan from an xyz monster does it get its gy search effect?
no it doesnt
Wait I have a question it's about the MISC thing so let's say I go first then 1 set DNA surgery and then on their turn they use MISC will DNA surgery make the monsters a different type or will they be unaffected by MISC? (Apologize that Is confusing)
The monsters will still be affected by dna surgery, because misc make dinos unaffected by "activated" effects only, while dna surgery is a continuous effect.
@@ilirislamaj7559 ah ty
@@joshyuwu7735 no problem
Hey man, first off I just want to say I really enjoy your videos. My question is involving with D/D/D Duo-Dawn King Kali Yuga. What is the rule for spell speed for this card in particular to be negated, such as solemn Strike?
If you mean the effect of Kali Yuga, it doesn't activate. It simply applies the moment it is successfully Xyz Summoned. Due to this, you cannot respond to the effect.
you can still negate it with solemn strike, because it negates the summon all together
@@ScorpioneOrzion unless it was summoned with something like a rank up magic ? Unless im mistaken
@@airbomb24 yea then you cannot
If I activate Polymerization with only 2 monsters on my field and non in my hand and my opponent chains a card to destroy one of my monsters what would happen? Thanks
You don't perform a Fusion Summon.
So, XYZ material react the same (with D. Fissure) with Dark Law, Macro Cosmos or D. Shifter?
no those effect cards, not for sure monsters so they are just send to banish
The other examples banish all cards. Dimensional Fissure only banishes monsters which is the key thing.
The game has 7 kinds of cards which are xyz material, extra deck cards, deck cards, gy, banished, spell, trap and monsters. Macro cosmos, dark law and D shifter say "cards" which means all 7 different kinds while D fissure only works on "monsters". If you read the card effect of extra foolish burial goods for example it says "send a monster" which means you treat an extra deck card as a monster when you send it to the gy so d fissure would banish it. However say you destroyed a monster while d.fissure is on the field, that is now a continous spell like one of the abc pieces since it is a spell it goes to the gy.
ok so if I have lair of darkness up on the field, and my opponent has barrier statue of the stormwinds up on the field, am i legally allowed to activate monster gate, tributing stormwinds for cost with 0 wind monsters in my deck?
also coderL
You can only resolve monster gate in this scenario if you did have a wind monster in deck if not it is considered an illegal move. The activation of the card cannot be considered legally to be used because it is stopped by the wind barrier statue since you do not meet it's activation requirements activation effects require you to meet the state of the game + the card activation to be allowed to activate. Also even if lair of darkness is on the field lair of darkness does not affect monsters in the deck.
So long as you have monsters that can be Normal Summoned, you can activate Monster Gate. There's a ruling with Evilswarm Ophion - in this case, if Stormwinds is still faceup when you resolve Monster Gate and you hit a non-WIND it goes to GY. Here, if you tribute the Stormwinds, then it resolves as normal.
@@Balila_balbal_loki you're using a lot of words meaninglessly and getting the answer wrong on top of that.
I can usa an opponent moster that is immune to the other cards effect for summoning goddess of underworld or another chase tributing the same monster using something that tribute monster for cost?
Yes - it's not considered an effect, but cost.
If I activate the effect of a Lonefire Blossom equipped with Living Fossil tributing itself can I special summon a plant monster from my deck?
Yes, you can. Living Fossil stops negating its effects once it is no longer equipped.
the tribute is a cost you will successfully be able to tribute the lone fire in which case it is no longer affected by face up cards on the field so it resolves the effect you can also use lonefire under the effects of skill drain.
Coder I got a question, can my opinion use Infintrack river stormers first eff under droll
Yes, droll doesn't negate effects that add to hand, you just can't add to hand.
They can. In that case, the Machine monster is sent to the GY.
Foolish burrrrrrrr
Two questons: can I summon an XYZ monster of an attribute different than materials under gozen?
How does firewall bounce works?
Thank you
The ruling for gozen is the same than the one for tcboo and rivalry
You cannot attempt to summon a monster of an other attribute if gozen is on the field
Firewall targets the monsters in field and gy for each monster co-linked to this card for cost and then if it resolves the monsters targeted go to the owners hand.
What happends if u use Lancea if your opponent uses the Flundereeze cards?
I mean, do they get banished if they leave the field or not
@@kevingunterxd-3049 No, they go to the GY
@@lordobvious6655 Thx, wasn‘t sure
@@lordobvious6655 that was...obvious. LOL
Opponent has fansies on board. He proceeds to go cl1 TCBOO cl2 pandemonium. Makes butler with another copy of fansies from hand. At res he sends the fansies from board to GY. I was told the butler has to go to GY. Whats the ruling on this?
If both monsters were there when TCBOO resolved, they can choose.
If TCBOO is *already applying* and a new monster of the wrong type is now on the field (let's say, for example, it was banished for World Legacy Clash), then the newest monster is sent to the GY.
@@VyaxUltima so basically if he made tcboo cl2 pandemonium cl1 then the butler leaves by game mechanics?
Ddg or d shifter vs misc. When my opponent activates misc from hand and I chain ddg or d shifter does misc banished or does it discard itself for cost?
Miscellaneousaurus discards itself as a cost to activate its hand effect.
The game works like this. Do you meet activation requirements? Attempt to activate card effect paying it's activation cost -> response -> resolving card effect according to the state of the game. Misc discards for cost and is already in the gy before your opponent can respond.
If my opponent activates ferret flames and I control a monster unaffected by card effects, do I still have to send the monster?
If a monster is unaffected by card effects you can't send it only way for it to leave the field is destruction by battle
Since it makes the opponent shuffle so it is not a card effect it is an action that your opponent must do then yes you can shuffle an unaffected by card effects monster
Why tf we have to specifically use vanilla Red-Eyes when activating Red-Eyes Fusion and sending from deck, instead of any other dragon?
(Since the materials for Dragoon are Dark Magician+Red-Eyes *OR* any dragon monster)
Rulings, essentially. You must use the Red-Eyes monster that the fusion lists. This also applies to Destruction Swordsman Fusion and I believe Miracle Synchro Fusion.
@@VyaxUltima
But why that only applies when sending from deck? It makes absolutely no sense.
@@Vinicius-Bigode it doesn't. If you are using Red-Eyes Fusion, you must use a Red-Eyes monster. It doesn't matter where the materials are, it matters what one of them is.
Can you chain misc to zombie world so they don't become zombies?
yes you can chain to it and they will still be zombies
I control a Serziel, Watcher of the Evil Eye equiped with Evil Eye of Selene. The Serziel has (for argument's sake) gained 1000 ATK from the equip spell. My opponent activates the effect of Hot Red Dragon Archfiend Abyss to target and negate my Evil Eye of Selene. What happens to the ATK points that Serziel gained? I'm unsure because of the wording on Evil Eye of Selene that says that the ATK gain remains even if Evil Eye of Selene leaves the field
The effect of Evil Eye of Selene that increases Serziel's ATK is a lingering effect that applies on another card by activating and resolving each time, not a continuous effect. Even if Selene's effects are negated, Serziel's ATK will stay the same.
@@corebren2510 Huge thank you
Hi Coder, ruling question: What happens when you win the first duel of the match, but draw the second? Do you proceed to a game 3, and if so, if the opponent then wins the third game, what is the ruling for this scenario?
you always have to get 2 wins. which means,if you potentially are on 1-1-1 go for a 4th match. in real events from konami, if you are unable to win a match, which is possible due to time, they are considered a draw :)
Why can Warrior of atlanis add a legendary ocean to the hand when the card is always umi even during deck construction?
Yes
They made an exception so it could search that specific card.
Ever thought of trying MTG?
I find a particular interaction on Duel Links. I found that I could special Summon Block Dragon from the GY under Necrovalley. Is it correct?
block dragon does not activate(to summon from gy), necrovally only negates activations
@@VyaxUltima incorrect
@@sushipbestdeck8995 in truth, I forgot Block wasn't an effect.
However, Necro negates any effect, not just activated ones. It will prevent you summoning Grapha, for example.
@@VyaxUltima maybe i should have specified, you can summon block dragon from gy, BUT you can not banish from gy to summon the blocky boi you can only banish from hand.
@@VyaxUltima also grapha should work under necrovally
If I control meltdown (activation of cards/effects that fusion summon cannot be negated) and I use invocation, is my opponent legally allowed to try to negate the activation of invocation, even if it does nothing? If yes, why is meltdown's effect different from the solfacord effect?
No he cant chain i think since it is the same as the solfachord thingy. You cannot activate a card that negates something that cannot be negated. The difference with the solfachord is that the summon of SOLFACHORD ONLY monsters cannot be negated. So as coder said you can negate the pend summon of a non solfachord monster
You can chain a card to negate the activation, it just won't do anything.
Negating summons is different for some arbitrary reason.
@@VyaxUltima no. If you cant negate the activation you cannot activate a card that would negate the activation
@@NoirEmperor18 You can Belle Invocation when Meltdown is face up, it just does nothing and you go neg 1
@@NoirEmperor18 yes, you can.
I suggest going to the ygorganization database and searching rulings for Magic Jammer. There is one for Meltdown.
If pendulums goes on the graveyard, why i can't send a d/d pendulum monster on the graveyard to special summon D/D Lamia?
You cannot send a Pendulum from field to the GY as a cost.
because it requires you to send a card to the grave, what you cannot do with a pendulum monster
Say i gamma a monster effekt. Can my opponent respond with bell and negate my gamma even though I dont special from grave, since gamma can summon from hand, deck or grave?
Yes, because ghost belle specifically states it negates an effect that includes the ability to special from grave, which gammas effect does. Kinda similar to how ash can stop shaddoll fusion even if they wanna fuse from hand
Ruling question:
Say I activate raigeki and my opponent chains ehther the heavenly monarch to summon itself from hand. Do they still get the on summon effect of ehther the heavenly monarch or does it Miss timing
By the time Ehther would be able to activate its effect on summon, it's no longer in the location where that effect would trigger, but instead in the GY. So, according to the April 1st, 2020 rule changes (which all big official events have followed up till now), you can't activate Ehther's effect. Granted, you should still ask the Head Judge at your tournament, since they might not be adopting the rule changes.
Let me explain something in that scenario Chain-link 1 is raigeki and chain-link 2 is ehther so happens is ehther resolves then raigeki resolves and ehther just dies. He does not activate his effect because his effect starts a chain and he is in the graveyard and missed timing according to the rulings of tcg NA however this is only for tcg NA and not other tcg rulings.
@@Balila_balbal_loki Idk based on what you're saying this is just a TCG NA thing. This is most definitely an OCG thing, but which has been applied in all big TCG events since April 1st, 2020, whether they be NA or EU events. Don't see what TCG NA has to do with this.
How about you active nibiru and special summon it when shaddol winda face up on the field?
If Winda was already on field, Nibiru cannot activate its effect.
If you activate Nibiru and they opponent chains El Shaddoll/Schism, Winda gets summoned and then Nibiru tributes it while its effect is resolving (and thus can summon itself and the token, as Winda is off the field).
@@VyaxUltima oh thanks man
How does Tri-Brigade Revolt interact with cards like TCBOO, Summon Limit or El Shaddoll for example?
El Shaddoll Winda: If Winda was already on the field, you can not activate Revolt. If Winda hits the field after revolt was already activate, it will resolve as much as possible, so it will summon your monster back, but then you make no link-summon.
Summon Limit: When Summon Limit was already activate and you had not make any summon this turn, revolt will fully resolve without problem. When you already had summoned a monster under summon limit, revolt can not be activated.
TCBOO is difficult.
ok now that i thought and hear more about tribrigade revolt, i have definitely enough of ygo ruling questions for the moment.
Missed you my guy 🔥🔥🔥