it's interesting looking back at this, the first action movie with an all-black cast. especially after seeing black panther, the first action movie with an all-black cast.
I remember when I was a kid my dad took me to the cinema to see the first action movie with an all black cast, and I was amazed. Now I can bring to my son to see a new first action movie with an all black cast. I hope that in the future, new directors continued with the beatiful genre that is the first action movie with an all black cast.
As a german I can say that this film is entirely accurate in its depictions of my countrymen. Every day, before the routine sinister marching, I practice saying "Africans. Show no mercy." Into the mirror while cutting new scars on my face.
I found an old Lucasfilm magazine from the mid-90s and they mentioned Red Tails as one of Lucasfilm's upcoming projects, it spent 20 years in development hell!
Well, I guess HBO didn't wait and made "The Tuskegee Airmen" TV-movie in -95 :D Haven't seen it, but I would think that that is better than this shit that I unfortunately watched and discovered it to be just b-grade BS war movie with overly dramatic direction, and it looked horrible. This is a good story but it needs much better direction and a script, so it can be presented as it should... And just found out that the HBO TV-movie is at the moment in youtube :D go watch that
@@villemantyniemi1739 Seen it in early 00s. Laurence Fishburne is in it (that was my main draw to it back then) and aside being obviously working under TV movie limitations it's a really solid movie. Definitely has less cheese in it. It's no Glory, but it's still miles ahead of Red Tails. It's pretty amazing how Red Tails was marketed under the whole "FIRST MOVIE LIKE THIS", while a superior version was made 15 years earlier and no fuss or media histeria was attatched to it.
o good i know what timeline you are from dont wary you well be saved by cthulhu one week from now. and it will start a war of DARK LORD ZENU AND CTHULHU.
8:34 The Tuskeegee Airmen's motto was actually "Spit Fire." "Per Ardua ad Astra" ("Through Adversity to the Stars') is in fact the motto of the Royal Air Force. Since the latter has the word "adversity" in it, it got appropriated and put into the trailer, presumably to lure African-American audiences, while the Tuskeegee Airmen's own motto got left out. So much for honoring the Tuskeegee Airmen's legacy.
that scene in "Night at The Museum 2" where that one Tuskegee Airman keeps saying "The Tuskegee Airmen are on the march once again" was better than this entire movie
So you know that joust that the guy has in a P-51 against the ME-262? The one where he gets shot in the chest a dozen times? The ME-262 was armed with 4 30mm autocannons firing high-explosive shells intended to crack bombers in half. If that guy got hit in the chest with a single round, he wouldn't have a chest anymore. This movie is very fun.
No because Lucas didn't take a pre-existing franchise. Atleast he made his agenda movie without pissing off fans. Still doesn't make it right but still.
@chris malott, if you take a look at the History or Discovery channels, I'm sure you'll find enough WWII fanboys that would be pissed off by a movie like this. Reality (or at least a romanticized view of it) has enough fanboys to make any franchise jealous.
There are no "fanboys" of history. There are people who love and are fascinated by it but it's an entirely different beast from when it comes to pop culture fandoms.
People fictionalize history all the time. It's called historical fiction. You haven't met many world war 2 gets have you? Or many gets for that matter. They would find the inconsistencies trivial.
HBO just showed "Tuskegee Airmen" and the guide said "Red Tails" was coming on next. So, I watched the end of TA, where Laurence Fishburne acts out a sad, contemplative moment remembering his friends that died and it flashes back in a cheesy way to those characters' introduction scene plus one other memorable scene. But then it comes back to Fishburne curling up in his cot, with a tear in his eye and he acts the shit out of it and you feel the character's pain. And then I watched this review instead of waiting for "Red Tails" to start.
FManAngryAmerican George Lucas: Adolf Hitler is the key to all this. We’ve never had a character as funny as Hitler. I based him off my favourite comedian from the silent movie era. We just need to get him to work.
There are a ton of movies with an all black cast from the 70s, 80s, 90s, and on and on and on. It has been happening for decades. You have been sold a lie that racism and sexism is alive and well in the past few years.
@@DavidFrancis24824 Racism and sexism are dead folks, we can go home. As a black woman, Grant Schweitzer here says it's all good. You necro'd a two year dead post to say something asinine and stupid, congrats.
Bubo 25 I wish they'd make a Canadian villain. It would be celebrated across our country as the one time we were portrayed as more than just really nice people
Mau Jo Unfortunately, that site just has the same movies as youtube. 2 or 3 others, besides Star Wars/Trek, but that's all. So many other bad movies out there for him to do:) Hollywood has been busy for 100 years.
Aw, come on. It's scientifically proven that being black lets you shrug off multiple 30mm minengeschoss to the chest. And anti gravity fields were a thing in dogfights, yo.
So did others by that time (about sixty 262s were shot down just by americans before that happened, mostly from 8 AF (obviously not all in dogfights(parentheses, gotta love them))). I don't mean to diss the Tuskegee Airmen, I'm just saying I'd rather watch a movie true to their real achievements instead of a movie that has gone full Lucas.
This movie is heartbreaking. But not in the way they intended. Its heartbreaking to see a good true story portrayed in such a lame way. You guys nailed it. They had all the pieces to make THE oscar bait movie, but decided to do a TV movie.
The funnier part is that this movie was done WAY better in 1995, as a made-for-HBO film called "The Tuskeegee Airmen". Also starring Cuba Gooding Jr., oddly enough.
Steve Harvey speak for yourself. Imo opinion George owes us decades of community service.. cleaning up graffiti, picking up trash etc... I still wake up with nose bleeds from the nightmares i have of jar jars poorly conceived character.
George Lucas just got carried with the spectacle of visual effects. True special effects are a tool to tell a story, as he said in the 70s- 80s, but he also said that they need story to be exciting which he ended up ignoring/forgetting himself. Therefore CGI has been the only thing on his mind (in terms of filmmaking that is), such as the prequels being focused on spectacle (causing a story that had good potential to be overshadowed by superior spin off stories of the same era in the timeline), and him forcing (or rather *pesturing*) Spielberg into pitting Aliens in Indiana Jones 4.
Jan Frackiewicz I don't think the man responsible for The Conversation, The Godfather I and II and Apocalypse Now can ever be called a hack, no matter how low he's fallen. Same goes for Spielberg. They may have lost their spark for a good while now but when they were good, they were two of the best ever.
I saw the title "red tails" and went, "Oh, a Lucas film. Is this, like, a re;view? Wait, they reviewed this when it came out? Why have I never heard of it?" Really shows why I never knew about it.
Damn, I met the guys who did some of the CG for this. That part of the showreel was usually accompanied by something along the lines of "In the film industry you can get to work on great films, then sometimes you have to work on this.".
That bit where one of the pilots swoops down on a German cruiser (in the Mediterranean, who'd of known!) and shoots it with his machine guns and it explodes (cruisers weren't armoured or anything like that). That was great.
I love that you mentioned Glory. Glory does everything right when trying to tell a story like this. The characters do feel real, their character arcs are impactful (even in application to today's politics), and when we get that super emotional AND HISTORICAL ending, you cry. Glory took itself seriously, while also allowing for the actors to bring humanity into their performances. Denzel Washington, Morgan Freeman, Andre Braugher, and Jihmi Kennedy bring the voices of the men of the 54th to life. Even with Matthew Broderick (as Colonel Robert Shaw) as the lead, and Cary Elwes as well, the movie prioritizes the voices of the whole of the 54th rather then making it a "they vs us" race baiting situation. Glory tells the story of the men of the 54th fighting side by side overcoming predjudice to fight for freedom, during one of the most infamous wars in American history: the Civil War. It's a damn good movie, and I recommend everyone should see it. Glory puts any movie that tries this kinda stuff (like Redtails) to shame. Glory is a movie you can't get away with making today, but its a film that should never be forgotten because of that. Every actor brings their A-game and so do the writers, directors, and reenactors who worked hard to bring the story of the 54th to life. They did it to tell a story, not sell a product, and damn did they succeed.
It's interesting looking back at this, the first action movie with an all black cast. Especially after seeing Black Panther, the first action movie with an all black cast.
No they didn't, but people like to pretend they did for internet clout It's got two fairly prominent white characters among other people that appear in it and were in all the marketing.
Three years later, nobody remembered this film. Everybody will remembered 12 Years a Slave and Selma more than Red Tails. George Lucas failed as a Storyteller and a business man.
WalterLiddy How is it rehashed? Just curious because I don't think it isn't really rehashed or hell a typical Oscar bait and this is based on a book that was told from a point of view by a Slave which is directed by a British black man which is rare to see in any Hollywood movies (yeah, Django Unchained did it, but that was more of a cartoonish exploitation film than the realism in 12 years of Slave and 12 years a Slave is an older material that survive for years vs ripped off material from the 60's) and it isn't safe with their material and really brutal. Yeah, it have tropes and cliches, but something new and original have them too. I think it will be like Schindler's List where people in American history classes would show this film to show its depiction. But what's your point that something am missing?
George Lucas is a billionaire, his movies make hundreds of millions of dollars, even if they're bad, and he sells a ton of merchandise. So, no George Lucas is not a bad businessman, he's actually a great businessman, one of the best. He does fail as a film maker though, I'll agree with you on that.
Trystan McClellan I think its telling how those two films gathered such huge praise and respect for their story and they too were based on real figures and real events. I can only guess that Twelve Years a Slave and Selma did one thing that Red Tails did not and that was over-glorify itself as the be all end all of Black cinema. You can tell by the way Lucas is talking in those interviews that he views himself morally superior to the people he claimed wouldn't take the film and listed off a bunch f reasons why he ASSUMED they would not take the film. I remember watching the Tuskegee Airmen film that the guys are talking about back when I was 12 or so and loving it because it was interesting, entertaining and it didn't sugarcoat or try to be Star Wars when telling the story. To me, Lucas sounded so arrogant in how he was portraying himself to be this victim of the industry when HE IS THE INDUSTRY. He has millions in the bank and even if he was turned down, he still could have made this movie ON HIS OWN as he has enough funds himself to do so. He made himself out as some sort of poor, starving film-maker who is just being torn down by the Hollywood bullies when we all know that's a load of bull. As someone above me commented, he has been doing this for YEARS and made loads off it so I don't see how or why he thinks he's the victim in all of this when people will still come to him and ask for him to make movies, no matter the level of quality they are. Yes, Red Tails was a flop but if there is anything we can learn from it it's that you still need SUBSTANCE in your story. It feels like people were relying just on the fact that the cast was mostly Black as a means of drawing people in and after hearing a lot of BLACK critics just deflate after it came out it was just sad. It was sad because people got themselves hyped up, were made to believe this was going to be a breakthrough epic of some sort and it wasn't. It was just MEH with a big name to back it. Twelve Years a Slave and Selma DESERVE the praise they get because they were out to make a STORY, NOT to claim that they were the BEST nor did they talk down to the public who were still making up their minds whether to see them or not. These two movies and their directors were not making people feel guilty. They didn't cry and whine in interviews and I'm sure as hell that these stories got more shit than Red Tails because they didn't have the titles under their belt like Lucas did. These two films got the respect they deserved by delivering a story, a message, and a peak of history. Lucas just expected people to hand him praise on a platter because he was Lucas.
There was already film about "The Tuskegee Airmen" before "Red Tails" starring Laurence Fishburne, Allan Payne, Vicellous Shannon, Courtney Vance and... Cuba Gooding Jr.
That's insulting to videogames lol. There's been plenty of videogames that have storylines with depth, emotion, and well developed character arcs. It would be more accurate to say that this movie has the look and script of any soulless or single dimensional work of media
That's insulting to videogames lol. There's been plenty of videogames that have storylines with depth, emotion, and well developed character arcs. It would be more accurate to say that this movie has the look and script of any soulless or single dimensional work of media
+Ryan Mitchell HYPER LIGHT DRIFTER for instance uses *not words* but visuals, mood, and players' imagination to tell its story and lore, serving as the lead director's way to express his struggle with heart disease (through the main character) while being a solid game experience with rewarding exploration and great + challenging combat.
Have you even played a video game? That's awfully ignorant to just lump all video games into one category. That's no different than me saying all films are about cats.
Yes. Also, black skin is apparently impervious to such weapons, as the pilot of said P-51 takes several high-explosive cannon rounds to the chest and shrugs them off like he was hit with spitballs. Meanwhile, the .50 cal machine guns aboard his aircraft manage to cause an entire cruiser to explode into flames after a second or two of firing straight into the armored turret and deck. Truly, an inspirational film of grand historical accuracy. It shall be remembered for generatio-ohwait no it is already long forgotten.
Ok, so first of all, for the tiny record, I'm an African American professor in Detroit--Wayne State University (Cornell is my alma mater). I have taught film studies (English Dept.) and I am absolutely LOVING your review of "Red Asses" as I like to call it. Blood lust, cartoons, FLAT, cornball patriotic WWII movies, style defeats the purpose, unreal characters, dialogue on-the-nose, bad editing, phony, no heart or feeling, secretly directed god-awful script secretly directed by George Lucas, and so on.... These are your comments and they are each as true as the sun in the sky. Every word you said were the thoughts that I had, and so far I have heard only insane positive comments about this horribly racist, foolish film. I am one of the Black people in the theater you felt sorry for, and believe me, I felt sorry for myself for having spent money on this stiff, affirmative action goofing, overhyped bull crap. From the very beginning I sat there in fear of the inevitable moment when a Black character, would shout, "WHOOOOOOOO!" (as always in a bad Hollywood film or TV commercials, of documentary, or fast food ad). Sorry, I DO believe the movie wasn't touched by the studios Lucas approached because of racism, and that "Glory", which you are correct, was the antithetical GOOD film compared to "Red Asses", but you are wrong to gloss over the fact that Mathew Broderick is the 'shoe in' for studio acceptance. That IS a very common and for me by now disgusting reality about Hollywood. Black history, thought, and life is ritually 'shoed in' to American film through the inclusion of a White actor (he's the shoe in). You are understating the MASSIVE reality of racism in the medium of film and television. Consider the recent Golden Globe award given to a nonexistent film, "Hidden Fences". To White viewers this was I guess an honest mistake? (I hasten to add, that "Hidden booties" as I call is it just another "Red Asses" without planes but with space capsules and the inevitable "WHOOOO") To Black viewers of Golden Globes, this foolish flub was exactly what we experience in our every single day life: only two freaking Black films being awarded, and they had to conflate the two titles?? Believe me, co workers who have known me for years still do that to my freaking NAME(!?) One of my graduating students recently appeared on her Texas grad school's lists as "Opra Winfrey" (!?) (first name actually Donna). I can't afford to be as magnanimous as you are about the mighty fog of both primitive racism and 'careless' racism that marks Black life at the atomic level. My Black friends in the industry (including award winning independent Black director, Andre Seewood--I challenge you to interview him, he is the author of a book, "Slave Cinema") talk CONSTANTLY of the truth of everything Lucas says about the reaction to his film. Particularly hideous is the claim that Black films cannot be marketed overseas, though Blacks who travel on their own dime to France and Italy find out that they can be. They are. Just not by the major White studios, distributors, producers, and marketers. Andre can explain that to you--Spike Lee does not represent hundreds of independent Black filmmakers such as Andre who experience this crap constantly. Nevertheless, I am glad you did this review and that you achieved what I think is the perfect tone. You were careful, detailed, technical (Black movies and directors deserve technical analysis when they are good, as well as technically legitimate criticism when they are bad), and you paid the subject of Black film respect by not being afraid to still be mocking and humorous, which is your hallmark. You made a point of being truthful, and you said exactly what you think without any fear or any patronizing of Black people, and I love that. DO MORE BLACK MOVIES, good and (mostly) bad.
@@clericjack she did paragraphs, she just didnt remember to hit enter *twice*, because college professors don't write youtube comments all day. a word processor that grownups use all day would be indenting, automatically, so you don't need extra lines to break up paragraphs.
yeah I think they are in a little bubble in the racism angle. Also they were kinda wrong now that we have recently seen people or at least trolls claim to boycott blackness in movies.
@@mitchellhorton9382 You didn't read her comment, what the hell are you talking about, and do you have a point other than white people out number black people and therefore matter more?
Denzel Washington literally has his career started by Glory as far as movies go, since St. Elsewhere barely made him into "whatshisface TV star of one role" (and you should probably know how this usually goes after stuff like GoT, Supernatural and few other and their "starts" trying to break out). I finally saw Glory two weeks ago. Solid stuff - not perfect, but solid. A bit corny, but in the sense of "late 80s American Civil War movie that tries to be ground-breaking, but really can't, since it's late 80s", rather than "George Lucas is a complete hack" type of corn.
Seems like the same marketing strategy for this film was used and failed for the Sony Ghostbusters. "The movie is groundbreaking, and if you don't think so you're a -ist!"
This exactly what Javier Navarrete & Jim Caviezel did with Sound of Freedom. Claiming no one wanted make this film and that there is a moral obligation to watch it.
When I first watched Men of Honour, I wasn't aware that the Navy diver was black. I was blissfully enjoying a movie about a person facing hardship and overcome it with determination.
i didnt forget this movie. since i absolutely love air combat games and movies, this was a must watch for me. i dont give two shits that the cgi looks like it was made on a dreamcast. its ww2 planes shooting at each other, and that is a massive win for me.
I am from 2020, remember 2017's Starship Troopers re:view, where they made fun of how much rich changed in just 5 years (2012-2017).. you'll never suspect that they don't look like these nerds anymore.
It works as an analogy though. One reason the current ✡️ run system prefers blacks is because they cannot self-organize against the state, but whites have - and can again.
I have never heard of this movie. In fact, the first time I seen the thumbnail and read the title of the video, is the first time Ive seen anything about this movie, ever.
Yeah, I remember Black people trying to rally behind this movie and then we were all disappointed, but didn't really want to admit it. No one even talks about it anymore. I think it would be nice if not every movie with a large Black cast had "struggling against racism and poverty" as its main theme. It's not like those stories don't deserve to be told, but that's not the whole sum of the African American experience. That's why I appreciate Will Smith movies despite what some may think about him. That said, you can't make a movie about the Tuskegee Airmen without talking about racism. They consistently had to deal with racism in a military that undervalued African American soldiers; they held themselves to a such a high standard because they knew they were the representation of the Black soldiers who would follow (and probably because they didn't want to die either); and they were fighting a regime that was trying to build a blond-hair-blue-eyed master race and imprisoning millions of ethnic minorities. Race isn't just an "angle" here, it's kind of important to the story! With good direction, this could have been another Glory: a good action movie with insightful social commentary. I'm kind of annoyed that Mike said we didn't "need" another movie like that. How many great war movies have the same theme as another great war movie? But yeah, they're right: the movie was not good.
MsSphinx91 I'd get behind you on that. It's gotten to the point where it feels that even we have accepted that as the only means of delivering stories.
***** ..... Perhaps? I think it's just modern day Blaxploitation. It's easy drama, likely Academy nominations, diversity points, and guaranteed asses in seats. I think Hollywood cares more about guaranteed return on investment than making any particular group feel bad. If people are saying you're racist for not liking these types of movies, I think that's an issue with the audience, not a studio conspiracy.
The face scar thing is a real historical thing and has a cultural context. They're called Schmisse and they were fencing scars that were a mark of prestige.
Facial dueling scars were popular in Germany for upper class young men. They were more or less a college frat ritual which were supposed to convey both status and bravery. Although their popularity had faded somewhat by WWII, it would not be uncommon for German officers to have them. After the war they went away entirely which is why they seem odd to modern eyes.
All those studios that passed on Red Tails were right. It bombed. It's not about racism, it's about demographics. It doesn't tick any boxes that ANY demographic wants to see. If you're going to make a movie like this you'd better get Will Smith or Denzel Washington to be in it.
If i hadnt watched this video, i wouldve never known this movie existed. And if i had watched this movie, i wouldve still needed this video to remind me of it.
The problem with George Lucas is what they said in another review, that when he takes control over a film he ruins it. That's why Star wars was so great and memorable. He had to consult with other people who would not mind telling him his ideas are stupid. Race has nothing to do with the movie, he wanted people to get rallied up for the movie so they would go see it.
Makes me feel bad that he and his first wife got divorced in 1983. From what I've read she was a damn good editor who had worked on multiple Martin scores sees films and even won the Oscar for best editing with the original movie. According to interviews she was one of the only few people George would listen to and take criticism from, and Mark Hamill said that he felt like George would've made better movies nowadays had they stayed as partners.
Watching this almost a decade later, the way Mike and Jay laugh about how Lucas made it all about race like it’s some unusual cultural anomaly is fascinating; Considering that by 2020 the entire mainstream culture is obsessed with race. It is really telling.
It's hard to believe a studio would refuse to support a film purely because it has a black cast, when the movie sucked, and George Lucas using that as a means to promote his trash movie is offensive
Jay should 100% watch Glory ASAP. It's a fucking masterpiece. It's a movie that stirs up a lot of emotions, but it earns every emotional beat in the film. It doesn't make you feel ways about stuff just because the music and dialogue tells you that you should. It gets me every time when the 54th is marching in front of all the other regiments, and the one dude says "Give 'em hell, 54! It gets me every single goddamn time.
Future checking in. In “Dunkirk” you couldn’t even fucking see Tom Hardy’s face and it was infinitely better and he was less than a third. George Lucas ruined the chance for a world war 1 “Harlem Hellfighters” movie because he sucks so bad.
it's interesting looking back at this, the first action movie with an all-black cast. especially after seeing black panther, the first action movie with an all-black cast.
Can’t wait till they finally have an action movie with an all black cast
I remember when I was a kid my dad took me to the cinema to see the first action movie with an all black cast, and I was amazed. Now I can bring to my son to see a new first action movie with an all black cast. I hope that in the future, new directors continued with the beatiful genre that is the first action movie with an all black cast.
@antisocialite Glory also stars 2 white guys though...
@@simona.9730 irrelivent considering it's an all black cast
and Michael B Jordan is in both of them
As a german I can say that this film is entirely accurate in its depictions of my countrymen. Every day, before the routine sinister marching, I practice saying "Africans. Show no mercy." Into the mirror while cutting new scars on my face.
The working conditions are worse, but the morale higher
Amberbaum
They were as kind as they could be, considering we killed about half of the studio cast off with stuka raids
+Reverend Anton haha lol
But only when they were filming outside :P
Well done Reverend Anton, you cracked me up!
Ha! Nein.
I found an old Lucasfilm magazine from the mid-90s and they mentioned Red Tails as one of Lucasfilm's upcoming projects, it spent 20 years in development hell!
Better than Boyhood, took over 12 years to make!
Well, I guess HBO didn't wait and made "The Tuskegee Airmen" TV-movie in -95 :D Haven't seen it, but I would think that that is better than this shit that I unfortunately watched and discovered it to be just b-grade BS war movie with overly dramatic direction, and it looked horrible. This is a good story but it needs much better direction and a script, so it can be presented as it should...
And just found out that the HBO TV-movie is at the moment in youtube :D go watch that
@@villemantyniemi1739 Seen it in early 00s. Laurence Fishburne is in it (that was my main draw to it back then) and aside being obviously working under TV movie limitations it's a really solid movie. Definitely has less cheese in it. It's no Glory, but it's still miles ahead of Red Tails.
It's pretty amazing how Red Tails was marketed under the whole "FIRST MOVIE LIKE THIS", while a superior version was made 15 years earlier and no fuss or media histeria was attatched to it.
Does explain why he cast Cuba Gooding Jr 20 years too late though.
If you could find that magazine, please share! (Like the name & date)
Hi guys, I come from the future. Everybody forgot about this movie already, george or no george.
+DZ - 015 well im from even furdther future and i have to say fuck ZENU O HAIL CTHULHU!!!!.o and no one still remembers this film
+CharlemagnePalace okay but what about the movie.du people remember movie named red tails in your timeline its important ?!!!!
o good i know what timeline you are from dont wary you well be saved by cthulhu one week from now. and it will start a war of DARK LORD ZENU AND CTHULHU.
a know that
isodoublet well i'm even more from the future and the robots who have taken over think this movie is terrible
those cuts to george and oprah sitting in what looks like a mansion with a vineyard talking about the little people cracks me up
8:34 The Tuskeegee Airmen's motto was actually "Spit Fire." "Per Ardua ad Astra" ("Through Adversity to the Stars') is in fact the motto of the Royal Air Force. Since the latter has the word "adversity" in it, it got appropriated and put into the trailer, presumably to lure African-American audiences, while the Tuskeegee Airmen's own motto got left out. So much for honoring the Tuskeegee Airmen's legacy.
Spit Fire just sounds so much more bad ass especially for fighter pilots it is one of the best.
Spit fire is fucking badass and makes way more sense.
George Lucas is the savior of black people!
@@ChimpFromSpace Well, sure. He is the creator of Jar Jar Binks, for goodness' sake.
White liberals (such as the ones who produced this) don't care AT ALL about honouring Black people, just that they APPEAR to care.
that scene in "Night at The Museum 2" where that one Tuskegee Airman keeps saying "The Tuskegee Airmen are on the march once again" was better than this entire movie
facts
It's 2019 and no one remembers Red Tails... This review might be the only trace of its existence.
Andrew Smith Red Tails is a movie? Since when.
Is this a Sonic reference?
@@Yusuke_Denton Give it a year and it will be...
Now you can watch it for free
@@Edo_Ginting Looks like you are right... I was onto something for a while but 2020 made a fool of me yet again!
"Forgettable in 2 years." Well it's 2 years later and I had no idea this movie even existed.
Ironically written 2 years ago...
Damn, literally beaten to this comment from 2 years ago, by 9 hours........
@@Bowiiihowdyhow dare you? this is the first ever movie with an all black cast! how dare you forget.
@Yay !!! I was being sarcastic...
@Yay !!! and knowing is half the battle. or so they say...
Lucas: It's one of the first all black action pictures ever made
Dolemite: *BITCH ARE YOU FOR REAL!*
LMAO!
"Seen any good movies lately?" "No!"
So you know that joust that the guy has in a P-51 against the ME-262? The one where he gets shot in the chest a dozen times? The ME-262 was armed with 4 30mm autocannons firing high-explosive shells intended to crack bombers in half. If that guy got hit in the chest with a single round, he wouldn't have a chest anymore. This movie is very fun.
Fuckin' pussy can't even take 4 30mm minengeschoß to the chest~
I've never seen people age 20 years in 5 years, until now.
This is a reup from like 2010
More like 8!
Jay aged backwards, though.
and now they've aged again lol
its almost like cheeseburgers and cigerets with out any healthy life decisions is bad or something...
Wow, you think Paul Feig and Sony took a page out of Lucas's book when it came to marketing their flop this year?
Haleophant Green You sexist!
No because Lucas didn't take a pre-existing franchise. Atleast he made his agenda movie without pissing off fans. Still doesn't make it right but still.
@chris malott, if you take a look at the History or Discovery channels, I'm sure you'll find enough WWII fanboys that would be pissed off by a movie like this. Reality (or at least a romanticized view of it) has enough fanboys to make any franchise jealous.
There are no "fanboys" of history. There are people who love and are fascinated by it but it's an entirely different beast from when it comes to pop culture fandoms.
People fictionalize history all the time. It's called historical fiction.
You haven't met many world war 2 gets have you? Or many gets for that matter. They would find the inconsistencies trivial.
“If george lucas wasn’t attached to this movie it probably would’ve been forgotten in a few years.”
2020 Update, I completely forgot about this movie.
Same! I have no memory of this movie at all.
Only reason I know about this movie is because of this review. Good review, though.
Never heard of this shit
HBO just showed "Tuskegee Airmen" and the guide said "Red Tails" was coming on next. So, I watched the end of TA, where Laurence Fishburne acts out a sad, contemplative moment remembering his friends that died and it flashes back in a cheesy way to those characters' introduction scene plus one other memorable scene. But then it comes back to Fishburne curling up in his cot, with a tear in his eye and he acts the shit out of it and you feel the character's pain. And then I watched this review instead of waiting for "Red Tails" to start.
I just saw it (I don't know why) and I already forgot about it!
I had no idea that George Lucas was involved with this movie. Now everything makes sense.
Arioch IV It all makes sense now. Palatine is behind it all.
Arioch IV Jar Jar is the key to all of this.
It's like poetry, it rhymes
FManAngryAmerican George Lucas: Adolf Hitler is the key to all this. We’ve never had a character as funny as Hitler. I based him off my favourite comedian from the silent movie era. We just need to get him to work.
"It's the first all-black action movie" ... Damn George! Again ahead of his time. 6 years later and that movie might have even won an Oscar.
There are a ton of movies with an all black cast from the 70s, 80s, 90s, and on and on and on. It has been happening for decades. You have been sold a lie that racism and sexism is alive and well in the past few years.
@@DavidFrancis24824 And yet the movies that are pushed on us all & made popular aren't... why? Just look at award shows.
@@DavidFrancis24824 Racism and sexism are dead folks, we can go home.
As a black woman, Grant Schweitzer here says it's all good.
You necro'd a two year dead post to say something asinine and stupid, congrats.
Nope you forgot that it actually needs ALSO to be good
just checkin in from 2024, dont worry jay figures out his hair.
It's so dense
Robert Miller Every single image has a digital effect
xavi9able1 Fuck you Rick Berman!
Nah man.
It's stylistically designed to be that way
But you have to diminish the effects of it.
again it's like poetry, they rhyme.
Mike's rant at about 24:30 about portraying all Germans as villainous and making a propaganda movie is absolutely spot on.
We know you guys built the death star. stop lying.
Bubo 25 I wish they'd make a Canadian villain. It would be celebrated across our country as the one time we were portrayed as more than just really nice people
History Buffs' Saving Private Ryan review discusses that German-Czech misunderstanding pretty well.
Darkanims not all Germans fighting in the war were Nazis dude. That's like saying all Americans are apart of the KKK.
To my recollection, the German Air Force was the most deadly and battle hardened Air Force in ww2
I wished Plinkett reviewed this.
+Mau Jo I wish he reviewed everything. Where can you find more than what's here on youtube. Star Wars and Star Trek.
陈瀚龙 redlettermedia.com
Mau Jo Unfortunately, that site just has the same movies as youtube. 2 or 3 others, besides Star Wars/Trek, but that's all. So many other bad movies out there for him to do:) Hollywood has been busy for 100 years.
fourcrippledhorses Just happened to see this. Which one is blip? Who is the voice of Plinkett? Just a casual viewer, but I love the Plinkett reviews.
+Alex Feehan THanks, I hear it now. Does it make sense that I think Mike is a much better reviewer as Plinkett than as himself?:)
The film almost reaches "funny bad" levels if you have knowledge of Second World War aerial combat and other historical things like that.
Aw, come on. It's scientifically proven that being black lets you shrug off multiple 30mm minengeschoss to the chest. And anti gravity fields were a thing in dogfights, yo.
and catching a ME262 in level flight thats over a hundred mph faster. Failywood strikes again
i would guess the bit about the pilots flying of leaving the convoy is bollocks
He didn't eat a bunch of 30mm rounds in real life, but a Tuskegee airman did take down a 262
So did others by that time (about sixty 262s were shot down just by americans before that happened, mostly from 8 AF (obviously not all in dogfights(parentheses, gotta love them))).
I don't mean to diss the Tuskegee Airmen, I'm just saying I'd rather watch a movie true to their real achievements instead of a movie that has gone full Lucas.
This movie is heartbreaking. But not in the way they intended. Its heartbreaking to see a good true story portrayed in such a lame way. You guys nailed it. They had all the pieces to make THE oscar bait movie, but decided to do a TV movie.
Zealote There is a better Tuskegee Airmen movie and its's called....uh, The Tuskegee Airmen. I recommend THAT over this.
+Zealote Monuments Men was worse imo.
+Zealote I feel the same way about "Pearl Harbor".
@@SuperCosmicMutantSquid
So glad you mentioned it, it is by far superior.
The funnier part is that this movie was done WAY better in 1995, as a made-for-HBO film called "The Tuskeegee Airmen". Also starring Cuba Gooding Jr., oddly enough.
"Now that we've successfully ended racism, we should get back to work on the VCR." Jay, 12 years ago
"Its a real, actual motion picture, based on facts. Dig that."
George! You didn't have to produce an entire movie to atone for Jar Jar. A simple apology would of been enough.
Steve Harvey speak for yourself. Imo opinion George owes us decades of community service.. cleaning up graffiti, picking up trash etc... I still wake up with nose bleeds from the nightmares i have of jar jars poorly conceived character.
Without his mustache Jay looks like he's 9 years old. It's so adorable! =D
Tony McModeNut lol. He beer stay away from Hollywood then. Zing.
It still baffles me that George Lucas was a peer of guys like Coppola and Spielberg.
George Lucas just got carried with the spectacle of visual effects. True special effects are a tool to tell a story, as he said in the 70s- 80s, but he also said that they need story to be exciting which he ended up ignoring/forgetting himself. Therefore CGI has been the only thing on his mind (in terms of filmmaking that is), such as the prequels being focused on spectacle (causing a story that had good potential to be overshadowed by superior spin off stories of the same era in the timeline), and him forcing (or rather *pesturing*) Spielberg into pitting Aliens in Indiana Jones 4.
George was a major proponent of Special effects, a lot of his ability is shown in older movies of the 70-80s but with CGI he lost his edge.
Julian Webb To be fair: Coppola turned out to be a hack too. Remember 'Jack'?
Jan Frackiewicz I don't think the man responsible for The Conversation, The Godfather I and II and Apocalypse Now can ever be called a hack, no matter how low he's fallen. Same goes for Spielberg.
They may have lost their spark for a good while now but when they were good, they were two of the best ever.
@@ThreadBomb lol wtf. No that's great film
It's 2017 in the U.S. and I swear I've never heard of this movie.
I saw the title "red tails" and went, "Oh, a Lucas film. Is this, like, a re;view? Wait, they reviewed this when it came out? Why have I never heard of it?"
Really shows why I never knew about it.
Weird, because it's 2019 in Poland...
GHOSTBUSTERS appears to be this year's RED TAILS.
I'd have to disagree with you for saying that Ghostbusters is this year's Red Tails. At least Red Tails tried. Barely.
Red Tails definitely tried, but the execution was hopelessly flawed from the top down.
Nah, Red Tails at least had an interesting premise.
I loved Red Tails! It's my favourite film, I saw it right after I got diagnosed with Brain Cancer!
Are you sure it wasn't just before?
Two Idiots² 😂😂😂
Brain cancer was less painful I bet.
Damn, I met the guys who did some of the CG for this. That part of the showreel was usually accompanied by something along the lines of "In the film industry you can get to work on great films, then sometimes you have to work on this.".
That bit where one of the pilots swoops down on a German cruiser (in the Mediterranean, who'd of known!) and shoots it with his machine guns and it explodes (cruisers weren't armoured or anything like that). That was great.
It’s funny to look back at this movie and the same marketing tactic is used today.
Exactly how Sound of Freedom was marketed.
I love that you mentioned Glory. Glory does everything right when trying to tell a story like this. The characters do feel real, their character arcs are impactful (even in application to today's politics), and when we get that super emotional AND HISTORICAL ending, you cry. Glory took itself seriously, while also allowing for the actors to bring humanity into their performances. Denzel Washington, Morgan Freeman, Andre Braugher, and Jihmi Kennedy bring the voices of the men of the 54th to life. Even with Matthew Broderick (as Colonel Robert Shaw) as the lead, and Cary Elwes as well, the movie prioritizes the voices of the whole of the 54th rather then making it a "they vs us" race baiting situation. Glory tells the story of the men of the 54th fighting side by side overcoming predjudice to fight for freedom, during one of the most infamous wars in American history: the Civil War. It's a damn good movie, and I recommend everyone should see it. Glory puts any movie that tries this kinda stuff (like Redtails) to shame. Glory is a movie you can't get away with making today, but its a film that should never be forgotten because of that. Every actor brings their A-game and so do the writers, directors, and reenactors who worked hard to bring the story of the 54th to life. They did it to tell a story, not sell a product, and damn did they succeed.
Glory is Lost Cause myth trash.
@@filthyshoggoth Glory has nothing to do with the lost cause myth because it’s told from the perspective of the union/black units, not confederates
@@mckenzie.latham91 It isn't as bad as the director's next civil war movie, sure.
Wasn't Bad Boys a black action movie?
+KingTekins Doesn't count, it was film by a white guy.
+ZoddGuts gotta love that
Will smiths white
Michael bay directed
it was really more of a blacktion movie, so to speak
Finally someone talks about how amazing Glory is
+pablo henriquez
Thanks to this, I rewatched it this weekend and was blown away by how good it was even the second time around.
I was very pleasantly surprised when they played this in my jAmerican history class a couple years ago
The opening scene is fucking UNBELIEVABLE
True!!!!
Watched it in a class. It was so good that the class was completely quiet throughout.
It's interesting looking back at this, the first action movie with an all black cast. Especially after seeing Black Panther, the first action movie with an all black cast.
Marvel did the same thing with Black Panther. They said it was the first all black cast for a movie.
No they didn't, but people like to pretend they did for internet clout
It's got two fairly prominent white characters among other people that appear in it and were in all the marketing.
Three years later, nobody remembered this film. Everybody will remembered 12 Years a Slave and Selma more than Red Tails. George Lucas failed as a Storyteller and a business man.
Trystan McClellan I literally heard about this film a week or two ago.
WalterLiddy How is it rehashed? Just curious because I don't think it isn't really rehashed or hell a typical Oscar bait and this is based on a book that was told from a point of view by a Slave which is directed by a British black man which is rare to see in any Hollywood movies (yeah, Django Unchained did it, but that was more of a cartoonish exploitation film than the realism in 12 years of Slave and 12 years a Slave is an older material that survive for years vs ripped off material from the 60's) and it isn't safe with their material and really brutal. Yeah, it have tropes and cliches, but something new and original have them too. I think it will be like Schindler's List where people in American history classes would show this film to show its depiction. But what's your point that something am missing?
George Lucas is a billionaire, his movies make hundreds of millions of dollars, even if they're bad, and he sells a ton of merchandise. So, no George Lucas is not a bad businessman, he's actually a great businessman, one of the best. He does fail as a film maker though, I'll agree with you on that.
***** No, they don't. They just need to be good and memorable. Which Red Tails wasn't.
Trystan McClellan
I think its telling how those two films gathered such huge praise and respect for their story and they too were based on real figures and real events. I can only guess that Twelve Years a Slave and Selma did one thing that Red Tails did not and that was over-glorify itself as the be all end all of Black cinema. You can tell by the way Lucas is talking in those interviews that he views himself morally superior to the people he claimed wouldn't take the film and listed off a bunch f reasons why he ASSUMED they would not take the film. I remember watching the Tuskegee Airmen film that the guys are talking about back when I was 12 or so and loving it because it was interesting, entertaining and it didn't sugarcoat or try to be Star Wars when telling the story.
To me, Lucas sounded so arrogant in how he was portraying himself to be this victim of the industry when HE IS THE INDUSTRY. He has millions in the bank and even if he was turned down, he still could have made this movie ON HIS OWN as he has enough funds himself to do so. He made himself out as some sort of poor, starving film-maker who is just being torn down by the Hollywood bullies when we all know that's a load of bull. As someone above me commented, he has been doing this for YEARS and made loads off it so I don't see how or why he thinks he's the victim in all of this when people will still come to him and ask for him to make movies, no matter the level of quality they are. Yes, Red Tails was a flop but if there is anything we can learn from it it's that you still need SUBSTANCE in your story. It feels like people were relying just on the fact that the cast was mostly Black as a means of drawing people in and after hearing a lot of BLACK critics just deflate after it came out it was just sad. It was sad because people got themselves hyped up, were made to believe this was going to be a breakthrough epic of some sort and it wasn't. It was just MEH with a big name to back it.
Twelve Years a Slave and Selma DESERVE the praise they get because they were out to make a STORY, NOT to claim that they were the BEST nor did they talk down to the public who were still making up their minds whether to see them or not. These two movies and their directors were not making people feel guilty. They didn't cry and whine in interviews and I'm sure as hell that these stories got more shit than Red Tails because they didn't have the titles under their belt like Lucas did. These two films got the respect they deserved by delivering a story, a message, and a peak of history. Lucas just expected people to hand him praise on a platter because he was Lucas.
"A massive movement on Social Media to go see the movie. " So this was Black Panther before Black Panther.
This very review is more well-known and successful than the movie being reviewed.
"These men are pawns."
Jackmono1 We don’t care.
They were just a couple of songwriters...
3,2,3,4-4,2,3 AND-
There was already film about "The Tuskegee Airmen" before "Red Tails" starring Laurence Fishburne, Allan Payne, Vicellous Shannon, Courtney Vance and... Cuba Gooding Jr.
This film had the look and script of a video game.
That's insulting to videogames lol. There's been plenty of videogames that have storylines with depth, emotion, and well developed character arcs. It would be more accurate to say that this movie has the look and script of any soulless or single dimensional work of media
That's insulting to videogames lol. There's been plenty of videogames that have storylines with depth, emotion, and well developed character arcs. It would be more accurate to say that this movie has the look and script of any soulless or single dimensional work of media
+Ryan Mitchell HYPER LIGHT DRIFTER for instance uses *not words* but visuals, mood, and players' imagination to tell its story and lore, serving as the lead director's way to express his struggle with heart disease (through the main character) while being a solid game experience with rewarding exploration and great + challenging combat.
+Brandon Dozier Also HYPER LIGHY DRIFTER's storytelling through visuals gives it the feel of a Miyazaki film.
Have you even played a video game? That's awfully ignorant to just lump all video games into one category. That's no different than me saying all films are about cats.
Oprah is so cringeworthy
Propaganda is generally cringeworthy
"How are you going to point out that everyone is the same if you don't label them as all seperate things" is very fitting in 2018
Hello from 2021
As an aviation history buff, I still think the Tuskeegee Airmen deserve a better movie than this.
George Lucas played the black community like a fiddle.
Early Morning Gray well Tyler Perry's been doing it his whole career.
Yep. You told no lies.
How? None of them saw it lmao
black people didnt give a fuck or at least paid to see the bullshit.
Red Tails walked so Black Panther Could run
I get the feeling Anthony Hemingway was only there because they were afraid of possible backlash over an old white man directing this sort of film.
- The movie turned out pretty bad. How are we gonna sell it?
- *BLACK* *BLACK* *BLACK* *BLACK* *BLACK* *BLACK* *BLACK*
It seemed to work out for black panther and the live action Lion King remake
@Michael I hope he's not ahead of his time with the borderline bestialty in kids movie Howard the Duck
This is move where P-51 survives several 30mm hits without any damage to airframe?
Yes. Also, black skin is apparently impervious to such weapons, as the pilot of said P-51 takes several high-explosive cannon rounds to the chest and shrugs them off like he was hit with spitballs. Meanwhile, the .50 cal machine guns aboard his aircraft manage to cause an entire cruiser to explode into flames after a second or two of firing straight into the armored turret and deck.
Truly, an inspirational film of grand historical accuracy. It shall be remembered for generatio-ohwait no it is already long forgotten.
4 .50s, what a trash plane
Ok, so first of all, for the tiny record, I'm an African American professor in Detroit--Wayne State University (Cornell is my alma mater). I have taught film studies (English Dept.) and I am absolutely LOVING your review of "Red Asses" as I like to call it. Blood lust, cartoons, FLAT, cornball patriotic WWII movies, style defeats the purpose, unreal characters, dialogue on-the-nose, bad editing, phony, no heart or feeling, secretly directed god-awful script secretly directed by George Lucas, and so on....
These are your comments and they are each as true as the sun in the sky. Every word you said were the thoughts that I had, and so far I have heard only insane positive comments about this horribly racist, foolish film. I am one of the Black people in the theater you felt sorry for, and believe me, I felt sorry for myself for having spent money on this stiff, affirmative action goofing, overhyped bull crap. From the very beginning I sat there in fear of the inevitable moment when a Black character, would shout, "WHOOOOOOOO!" (as always in a bad Hollywood film or TV commercials, of documentary, or fast food ad).
Sorry, I DO believe the movie wasn't touched by the studios Lucas approached because of racism, and that "Glory", which you are correct, was the antithetical GOOD film compared to "Red Asses", but you are wrong to gloss over the fact that Mathew Broderick is the 'shoe in' for studio acceptance. That IS a very common and for me by now disgusting reality about Hollywood. Black history, thought, and life is ritually 'shoed in' to American film through the inclusion of a White actor (he's the shoe in).
You are understating the MASSIVE reality of racism in the medium of film and television. Consider the recent Golden Globe award given to a nonexistent film, "Hidden Fences". To White viewers this was I guess an honest mistake? (I hasten to add, that "Hidden booties" as I call is it just another "Red Asses" without planes but with space capsules and the inevitable "WHOOOO") To Black viewers of Golden Globes, this foolish flub was exactly what we experience in our every single day life: only two freaking Black films being awarded, and they had to conflate the two titles?? Believe me, co workers who have known me for years still do that to my freaking NAME(!?) One of my graduating students recently appeared on her Texas grad school's lists as "Opra Winfrey" (!?) (first name actually Donna).
I can't afford to be as magnanimous as you are about the mighty fog of both primitive racism and 'careless' racism that marks Black life at the atomic level. My Black friends in the industry (including award winning independent Black director, Andre Seewood--I challenge you to interview him, he is the author of a book, "Slave Cinema") talk CONSTANTLY of the truth of everything Lucas says about the reaction to his film. Particularly hideous is the claim that Black films cannot be marketed overseas, though Blacks who travel on their own dime to France and Italy find out that they can be. They are. Just not by the major White studios, distributors, producers, and marketers. Andre can explain that to you--Spike Lee does not represent hundreds of independent Black filmmakers such as Andre who experience this crap constantly.
Nevertheless, I am glad you did this review and that you achieved what I think is the perfect tone. You were careful, detailed, technical (Black movies and directors deserve technical analysis when they are good, as well as technically legitimate criticism when they are bad), and you paid the subject of Black film respect by not being afraid to still be mocking and humorous, which is your hallmark. You made a point of being truthful, and you said exactly what you think without any fear or any patronizing of Black people, and I love that. DO MORE BLACK MOVIES, good and (mostly) bad.
That comment was longer than my English essay
Would think a college professor would know NOT to present a treatise as a huge block of text.
@@clericjack she did paragraphs, she just didnt remember to hit enter *twice*, because college professors don't write youtube comments all day. a word processor that grownups use all day would be indenting, automatically, so you don't need extra lines to break up paragraphs.
yeah I think they are in a little bubble in the racism angle. Also they were kinda wrong now that we have recently seen people or at least trolls claim to boycott blackness in movies.
@@mitchellhorton9382 You didn't read her comment, what the hell are you talking about, and do you have a point other than white people out number black people and therefore matter more?
And wait didn't Oprah Winfrey get nominated for the color purple. And didn't Denzel Washington get nominated for Glory.
Denzel Washington literally has his career started by Glory as far as movies go, since St. Elsewhere barely made him into "whatshisface TV star of one role" (and you should probably know how this usually goes after stuff like GoT, Supernatural and few other and their "starts" trying to break out).
I finally saw Glory two weeks ago. Solid stuff - not perfect, but solid. A bit corny, but in the sense of "late 80s American Civil War movie that tries to be ground-breaking, but really can't, since it's late 80s", rather than "George Lucas is a complete hack" type of corn.
Yup. This movie was forgotten in less than 1 year.
I loved this movie when it was called "The Tuskegee Airmen".
Seems like the same marketing strategy for this film was used and failed for the Sony Ghostbusters. "The movie is groundbreaking, and if you don't think so you're a -ist!"
"a movie about getting over racism is abit out of date" wait till you get to 2016
The Magnificent Xefox what are you talking about
@@ThreadBomb the black guys who went on a racially fueled murder spree in baton rouge and dallas were also "good people"
@DejaVoodooDoll Colin Flaherty's videos on TH-cam, Bitchute and Minds.
Wait 'til you get to 2020.
Wait till you get to 2040....
Anyone?
This exactly what Javier Navarrete & Jim Caviezel did with Sound of Freedom. Claiming no one wanted make this film and that there is a moral obligation to watch it.
"every time i see the lucasfilm stamp, i break out in hiiives"
I feel you, dude
George Lucas was far ahead of his time when it comes to playing the race card for marketing purposes
Usually when an enemy soldier invites himself into the home of a woman he finds attractive it's a setup for rape, and Red Tails is no exception.
I really hope Jay has seen Glory since when this was recorded, it deserved every Academy Award it got.
When I first watched Men of Honour, I wasn't aware that the Navy diver was black. I was blissfully enjoying a movie about a person facing hardship and overcome it with determination.
3:49 - "It'd be a completely forgotten movie in a couple years"
It already is
This was last year and they look ten years younger. Some downright presidential aging
It was uploaded in 2015, it was made in 2012.
"Sticking it to Hollywood and supporting George Lucas"
Lol
The level of stupidity in that quote --- who bought that happy horse-shit?
George Lucas: "It's an all black cast"
He thought Brian Cranston was black because he'd heard he played a drug dealer
oof
I can't believe this came out in 2012, it feels like 2002 now
How are you supposed to show that people are all the same except by pointing out all their differences
"It's 2012."
That was said twelve years ago.
I need a shower.
i didnt forget this movie. since i absolutely love air combat games and movies, this was a must watch for me. i dont give two shits that the cgi looks like it was made on a dreamcast. its ww2 planes shooting at each other, and that is a massive win for me.
I am from 2020, remember 2017's Starship Troopers re:view, where they made fun of how much rich changed in just 5 years (2012-2017).. you'll never suspect that they don't look like these nerds anymore.
"Every time I see the Lucasfilm stamp I break out in hives." Lol wtf?
"No one has ever said they are not going to see a movie because black people are in it."
Man, 2012 was a different time, and yet, the same.
They brought in black soldiers because the white ones keep wandering off.....
That is such a weird plot point.
It works as an analogy though. One reason the current ✡️ run system prefers blacks is because they cannot self-organize against the state, but whites have - and can again.
Ya gotta love George Lucas... just pretending the genre of Blaxploitation didn't exist...
In fairness, digging a tunnel in the woods is a lot harder than just outside the woods. Tree roots are a nightmare.
I have never heard of this movie. In fact, the first time I seen the thumbnail and read the title of the video, is the first time Ive seen anything about this movie, ever.
He might have gone too far in a few places...
Yeah, I remember Black people trying to rally behind this movie and then we were all disappointed, but didn't really want to admit it. No one even talks about it anymore.
I think it would be nice if not every movie with a large Black cast had "struggling against racism and poverty" as its main theme. It's not like those stories don't deserve to be told, but that's not the whole sum of the African American experience. That's why I appreciate Will Smith movies despite what some may think about him.
That said, you can't make a movie about the Tuskegee Airmen without talking about racism. They consistently had to deal with racism in a military that undervalued African American soldiers; they held themselves to a such a high standard because they knew they were the representation of the Black soldiers who would follow (and probably because they didn't want to die either); and they were fighting a regime that was trying to build a blond-hair-blue-eyed master race and imprisoning millions of ethnic minorities. Race isn't just an "angle" here, it's kind of important to the story! With good direction, this could have been another Glory: a good action movie with insightful social commentary. I'm kind of annoyed that Mike said we didn't "need" another movie like that. How many great war movies have the same theme as another great war movie?
But yeah, they're right: the movie was not good.
MsSphinx91 I'd get behind you on that. It's gotten to the point where it feels that even we have accepted that as the only means of delivering stories.
***** ..... Perhaps? I think it's just modern day Blaxploitation. It's easy drama, likely Academy nominations, diversity points, and guaranteed asses in seats. I think Hollywood cares more about guaranteed return on investment than making any particular group feel bad. If people are saying you're racist for not liking these types of movies, I think that's an issue with the audience, not a studio conspiracy.
The face scar thing is a real historical thing and has a cultural context. They're called Schmisse and they were fencing scars that were a mark of prestige.
$58 million budget
$50 million worldwide total box office
oof
i do hope we get a Red Tails holiday special for T.V...
Facial dueling scars were popular in Germany for upper class young men. They were more or less a college frat ritual which were supposed to convey both status and bravery. Although their popularity had faded somewhat by WWII, it would not be uncommon for German officers to have them. After the war they went away entirely which is why they seem odd to modern eyes.
All those studios that passed on Red Tails were right. It bombed. It's not about racism, it's about demographics. It doesn't tick any boxes that ANY demographic wants to see. If you're going to make a movie like this you'd better get Will Smith or Denzel Washington to be in it.
If i hadnt watched this video, i wouldve never known this movie existed. And if i had watched this movie, i wouldve still needed this video to remind me of it.
It’s wild how Star Wars prequel-apologists are blind to the fact that George Lucas is a HORRENDOUS director. He’s been great at producing movies
The problem with George Lucas is what they said in another review, that when he takes control over a film he ruins it. That's why Star wars was so great and memorable. He had to consult with other people who would not mind telling him his ideas are stupid. Race has nothing to do with the movie, he wanted people to get rallied up for the movie so they would go see it.
Makes me feel bad that he and his first wife got divorced in 1983. From what I've read she was a damn good editor who had worked on multiple Martin scores sees films and even won the Oscar for best editing with the original movie. According to interviews she was one of the only few people George would listen to and take criticism from, and Mark Hamill said that he felt like George would've made better movies nowadays had they stayed as partners.
+Kevin Petrak *Martin Scorsesee
2021 here. I had no idea this film existed. And im a big star trek wars fan.
Watching this almost a decade later, the way Mike and Jay laugh about how Lucas made it all about race like it’s some unusual cultural anomaly is fascinating; Considering that by 2020 the entire mainstream culture is obsessed with race. It is really telling.
This video keeps punching me in the face with the fact that 2012 was 7 years ago
Ten now...
@@luiginastro8831 still 10 😵
From a few years on the future, I can safely say we all forgot about it anyway.
SEEN ANY GOOD MOVIES LATELY?
+kalibos NO
Space Cop
I heard that movie was made by a group of hack frauds.
Darth Armis it's stylistically designed to be that way.
It's hard to believe a studio would refuse to support a film purely because it has a black cast, when the movie sucked, and George Lucas using that as a means to promote his trash movie is offensive
"Why do they have to label everyone's race all the time? "
Nail on the head.
A real actual motion picture based on facts
Orson Welles literally put on Macbeth with an all black cast in 1936.
Jay should 100% watch Glory ASAP. It's a fucking masterpiece. It's a movie that stirs up a lot of emotions, but it earns every emotional beat in the film. It doesn't make you feel ways about stuff just because the music and dialogue tells you that you should.
It gets me every time when the 54th is marching in front of all the other regiments, and the one dude says "Give 'em hell, 54!
It gets me every single goddamn time.
Future checking in. In “Dunkirk” you couldn’t even fucking see Tom Hardy’s face and it was infinitely better and he was less than a third. George Lucas ruined the chance for a world war 1 “Harlem Hellfighters” movie because he sucks so bad.