Went 3-1 at locals with the deck today. Only loss was in time to burn. Placed 3rd overall. If the Azamina engine gets rolling you win that simple. Sol was a nice boardbreaker as well at times going 2nd. Light and Darkness Dragon Lord was as often the wincon as the Puppet. Love this deck but want to try out different ratios still.
Thank you. Such feedback is very motivating. I'm still planning on uploading a proper combo series. But that's a lot of work and I'm quite busy rn with work stuff. Once that relaxes more I'll upload a bunch of combos for starters and novices.
So - lately been noticing decks having a really hard time dealing with 2x Masqs which are pretty easy to flip into especially if you add Drama - I know people "think" it has fallen out of effect but it's a free body to throw in and out of gy/banish and it resummons and has a trigger that you can exploit (using MJ, etc) and then negate a ED monster on their side... I've also had people outright lose it because I put 1x Mask Change II and Dark Law in ED... so... you drop Aluber and kick him off and they'll obviously move to imperm - wait not so fast, Mask Change II into Dark Law, they surrender... it's crazy the meta is very reliant on the GY now and 1st turn Dark Law + REDD + LADD is just something most decks can't even comprehend.
Im testing branded azamina rnand ive been trying without puppet, kitt, or high spirits. The logic is that I'm trying to reduce the need for multi-card combos and to maximize the likelihood of seeing azamina cards.
would be interested to see test hand video where you can show different lines maybe and how to play between the two different engines, especially if you draw suboptimal one way or the other.
It's definitely a risk though I don't think that they will hit the Witch. If they do that though they hit the Azamina engine hard and it's relatively new and will get a bunch of support still in Supreme Darkness. Maybe they just hit the Snake-Eye cards directly (e.g. Flameberge to 0) and limit the poster to 1.
@@nhatminhtran1656 it's definitely worth a try. 3x eclipse would be my way to go in the main then. You can also experiment with cutting the banishment or even the puppet (so you rely on 4x negate) in order to boost consistency. I'm currently also experimenting with a higher deck count that plays stronger into high spirits with 3x Witch, 3x Saronir & 3x Shrouded. I love the synergy they offer with the witch. But I'm not sure which variant is better yet.
Went 3-1 at locals with the deck today. Only loss was in time to burn. Placed 3rd overall. If the Azamina engine gets rolling you win that simple. Sol was a nice boardbreaker as well at times going 2nd. Light and Darkness Dragon Lord was as often the wincon as the Puppet. Love this deck but want to try out different ratios still.
Finally a new branded video!!!! thank yuo so much man for uploading
Thank you. Such feedback is very motivating. I'm still planning on uploading a proper combo series. But that's a lot of work and I'm quite busy rn with work stuff. Once that relaxes more I'll upload a bunch of combos for starters and novices.
So - lately been noticing decks having a really hard time dealing with 2x Masqs which are pretty easy to flip into especially if you add Drama - I know people "think" it has fallen out of effect but it's a free body to throw in and out of gy/banish and it resummons and has a trigger that you can exploit (using MJ, etc) and then negate a ED monster on their side... I've also had people outright lose it because I put 1x Mask Change II and Dark Law in ED... so... you drop Aluber and kick him off and they'll obviously move to imperm - wait not so fast, Mask Change II into Dark Law, they surrender... it's crazy the meta is very reliant on the GY now and 1st turn Dark Law + REDD + LADD is just something most decks can't even comprehend.
Im testing branded azamina rnand ive been trying without puppet, kitt, or high spirits. The logic is that I'm trying to reduce the need for multi-card combos and to maximize the likelihood of seeing azamina cards.
would be interested to see test hand video where you can show different lines maybe and how to play between the two different engines, especially if you draw suboptimal one way or the other.
I played a similar build but played eclipse over droplet.
Recently have cut the azamina stuff in favor of 60 card build. But I might go back to it.
@@XXSoulxEvans 60 cards is definitely tempting. Those builds have just so much gas. But I hate the idea of siding when playing 60.
Do u think can limit biabellstar to 1 and wanted to 1 next banlist? im thinking in buying the engine
It's definitely a risk though I don't think that they will hit the Witch. If they do that though they hit the Azamina engine hard and it's relatively new and will get a bunch of support still in Supreme Darkness. Maybe they just hit the Snake-Eye cards directly (e.g. Flameberge to 0) and limit the poster to 1.
What do you think if we play 2 Aluber because we can brick with too many normal summons?
Good call. I've done so in many branded lists I've tried before. The 3 Aluber is often just out of habbit when building a Branded deck.
Why branded Lost doesnt get negated by LADD?
So branded lost says that your card and effects that include an effect the fusion summon a function monster CANT BE NEGATED. Hope that helps!
Because it's already face up on the field and lad doesn't negate continues spell/trap that already face up on the field
do u think u should bump the count to 50 and play more board breaker
@@nhatminhtran1656 it's definitely worth a try. 3x eclipse would be my way to go in the main then. You can also experiment with cutting the banishment or even the puppet (so you rely on 4x negate) in order to boost consistency. I'm currently also experimenting with a higher deck count that plays stronger into high spirits with 3x Witch, 3x Saronir & 3x Shrouded. I love the synergy they offer with the witch. But I'm not sure which variant is better yet.