2017 Porsche Panamera | CarGurus Test Drive Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @GKTV1
    @GKTV1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I thought my next Porsche would be the 2014 Panamera, I think ill wait for the 2017 model!

  • @bentontramell
    @bentontramell 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Love the use of charts

  • @DriveAndBeDriven
    @DriveAndBeDriven 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Neat test drive review! I am really liking the updated design of this 4-door, especially from the rear. The interior still appears to be pretty button happy, but at least Porsche integrated everything very well. From one car enthusiast to another, keep it up! 👍🏽

  • @ianalexander2017
    @ianalexander2017 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks good

  • @DrMaxRusher
    @DrMaxRusher 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    0:13 It is indeed the fastest luxury sedan. It holds the reccord on the Nordschleife for sedans.Furthermore it takes about 3.6 seconds to 60 and not 3 flat...
    I don't know maybe you should check some facts before posting it on youtube!

    • @cargurus
      @cargurus  7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Hey DrMaxRusher, we based "fastest" solely upon max top speed, which is topped by the Aston Martin Rapide at 203 mph. Although you have correctly identified that Porsche reports 0-60 for the Panamera Turbo at 3.6 seconds, our reviewer Cliff has found that manufacturers, such as Porsche, tend to release conservative estimates that do not communicate the true ability of their vehicles. Because of this we used Car and Driver's estimate of 3.0 seconds - www.caranddriver.com/porsche/panamera-turbo-turbo-s. Regardless of the numbers, the Panamera Turbo is undoubtedly FAST and is a blast to drive.

  • @DisabledTeamYT
    @DisabledTeamYT 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    First one was beautiful

  • @OMGz1122
    @OMGz1122 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The new Mercedes s63amg? I know the Mercedes resale value sucks after some years, but both cars spec-ed around the same money, I don't know which to choose

  • @budzcruz2752
    @budzcruz2752 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    wrong title.. that’s not 2017

  • @mainlymusicman
    @mainlymusicman 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    0-60 3 seconds flat? no.

  • @Dvasqz
    @Dvasqz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does every Porsche press car have this license plate?

  • @golfbuddy1969
    @golfbuddy1969 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always thought of this car as being a he-man's car...until this review.

    • @cartmann227
      @cartmann227 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      golfbuddy1969 what do you mean?

  • @z.a8847
    @z.a8847 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5:47 I have a Porsche Panamera and I smoke cigars in it -- if my car doesn't give me (the luxury to ruin it) then it's not worth buying.

  • @piotr2951
    @piotr2951 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You could mention that those air vents can ONLY be operated by the touch screen and there's like half a second delay which is pretty annoying. There are a lot more annoying things you never mentioned either. Why bother to do a review when you are only going to mention the positives ?

  • @PSXuploads
    @PSXuploads 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why do you put music over the sound of the car? What a silly review

  • @mainlymusicman
    @mainlymusicman 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0-60 is not 3 seconds flat. lol

    • @cargurus
      @cargurus  7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hey mainlymusicman, we based that number on Car and Driver's estimate (www.caranddriver.com/porsche/panamera-turbo-turbo-s), not the number released by Porsche, which is 3.6 seconds. Cliff has found manufacturer estimates to be consistently conservative and not a true representation of a car's ability.

  • @Vic292
    @Vic292 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I actually prefer the precedent model. The rear of this model looks like a Dodge.