Russian Nuclear Weapons in Space? Here’s What We Know. | WSJ

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ค. 2024
  • Russia wants to put a nuclear weapon into space, new intelligence suggests. Although details are slim, policy experts said that the technology could be used against satellites, raising questions about Russia’s intentions and the potential ramifications of an orbital detonation.
    WSJ looks at the history of nuclear detonation in space with Starfish Prime and explores what we know about Moscow’s development.
    Starfish Prime test footage courtesy of Atomcentral: • Trinity and Beyond - N...
    Chapters:
    0:00 The U.S.’s new intelligence
    0:37 What we know so far
    1:45 Starfish Prime
    4:21 Russian capabilities in space
    News Explainers
    Some days the high-speed news cycle can bring more questions than answers. WSJ’s news explainers break down the day's biggest stories into bite-size pieces to help you make sense of the news.
    #Russia #Nuclear #WSJ

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @seanbaskett5506
    @seanbaskett5506 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +145

    Russia has had FOBS systems in play since the SS-18 went online. This is designed as an anti-sat/EMP weapon. What most don't realize is that any Teller-Ulam thermonuclear detonated as a high atmospheric airburst will have this effect. This is not new, nor is it terrifying. Literally been around since at least the early '80's.

    • @toxicgracie3772
      @toxicgracie3772 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly, Cold War tech. This is fear mongering at it's finest

    • @I_cant_sneed
      @I_cant_sneed 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      shhhhh people arnt suppose to know that

    • @johnnyllooddte3415
      @johnnyllooddte3415 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      an emp is not a nuke.. thats just stpd silly

    • @tweety9003
      @tweety9003 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Qatar customer service

    • @SyntaxErr19287
      @SyntaxErr19287 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Operation Starfish prime

  • @sp15_
    @sp15_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    "Be very very afraid." - the news

  • @TheOcean777
    @TheOcean777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +170

    It’s called fear mongering. It helps the military industry complex thrive.

    • @SilverStarHeggisist
      @SilverStarHeggisist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Exactly and it helps line politician's pockets

    • @redredwine1054
      @redredwine1054 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      So are you telling me Putin was fuelling the "military industry complex" when he was threatening to use nukes because of Ukraine?

    • @r3dp1ll
      @r3dp1ll 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@redredwine1054 he never said that. He said if they are directly attacked by NATO.

    • @diamanteduul8084
      @diamanteduul8084 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@redredwine1054You know Putin never directly talks about nukes? The headlines you see are always his RESPONSES when he is asked to comment about US/EU politicians talking about nukes. At least that's how 'nuke' talks started 🙃 now the cats out of the bag

    • @YaraMits
      @YaraMits 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@redredwine1054i can assure you, ruzzia had never used its nukes on civilian targets, unlike murica. See?

  • @loganfignewton
    @loganfignewton 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +280

    Isn't this the plot of Modern Warfare 2?

    • @drwalka10
      @drwalka10 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      lol It def was 😂

    • @padhlekaamaayega
      @padhlekaamaayega 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      The 2009 one?

    • @AspieTrips
      @AspieTrips 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes the only good MW2, not this new stuff. @@padhlekaamaayega

    • @rundown132
      @rundown132 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      It's all coming full circle

    • @gregorio3139
      @gregorio3139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The real plot is that this is another (((urgent))) fundraiser for the MIC.

  • @Dilexro
    @Dilexro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +182

    man this just gives me throwback to the mw2 campaign

    • @9kk99k9k
      @9kk99k9k 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It is. 😂

    • @furkanyldz8460
      @furkanyldz8460 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      game has already begun, wake up neo

  • @Ata5ll
    @Ata5ll 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    And then they blame the normal guy's fridge for the hole in the Ozon layer

  • @aadityapratap007
    @aadityapratap007 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    That simply means Pentagon wants to deploy nukes up on space. That's spooky.

    • @larrymunn5279
      @larrymunn5279 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ... I don't think that would solve this particular issue idk how much of this you watched or took in. The solution to too much radiation isn't to pour even more on lol.

  • @Lt_Starburst
    @Lt_Starburst 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +236

    WSJ commentator keeps calling it Starship Prime while the original footage clearly says Starfish Prime, AAAAHHHHH

    • @sirdiealot53
      @sirdiealot53 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      My brain 🫠

    • @damaimakhlukhidup
      @damaimakhlukhidup 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      depending on the language culture. As we always say, if we do something America can disagree. But if America wants to do something, we have to agree. Otherwise it means we are not friends and America will invite friends to impose sanctions on us. This is the double standards of the dictatorial king's democratic ideology. So starfish for certain people might be starship.

    • @Crangaso
      @Crangaso 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Chocolate Starfish Prime

    • @philip2205
      @philip2205 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@wishunter9000 Notice how they called it "Starfish Prime" in the chapters... They made thiny slip ups in reporting before you know. I find it ironic how you care so much about this one screw up yet place no emphasis on the otherwise excellent video...

    • @philip2205
      @philip2205 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@damaimakhlukhidup I'd much rather follow what America has to say than China. Besides, I find that connection a little farfetched...

  • @finesupplements9698
    @finesupplements9698 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    The US military budget is literally 20 times of Russia’s, yet Russia has Orbital Nukes and hypersonic missiles.

    • @lajoswinkler
      @lajoswinkler 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      "Nuclear weapons exploding in space" is NOT "orbital nukes".

    • @wanderingquestions7501
      @wanderingquestions7501 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well you have to consider the added expense of all those the USA bribes….. just to keep things in perspective. And the USA’s budget likely supports a number of other countries’ militaries.

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Russia is so great, we should all move over there /s

    • @rog2458
      @rog2458 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And you don’t think we have the same or better? Come on dude.🤫

    • @cryora
      @cryora 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Costs are also higher in the US.

  • @RadagastilBruno666
    @RadagastilBruno666 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    I feel confused, a few months ago the news came out that the Russians had run out of missiles there, even the infantry was fighting with shovels.
    Now I find them threatening open space. Isn't this magic?

    • @russelljames5631
      @russelljames5631 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Us propaganda designed to continue public support on both ends. On one hand we should spend more on military because they are almost finished but on the other hand we should spend more because they are such a threat.

    • @RadagastilBruno666
      @RadagastilBruno666 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@russelljames5631 In a few words, War Machine Industry...

    • @enlighty
      @enlighty 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wait, wait , wait. I remember that MSM said that there are no rockets left in Russia and Ukraine says that they use microchips from washing machines for rockets and now I have to believe that Russia builds nuke weapons in space with the same chips from microwaves and washing machines that are being stolen from Ukraine? Am i getting it right?

    • @DrFumiya
      @DrFumiya 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ⁠@@RadagastilBruno666In even more fewer words. Rich elites.

  • @user-rh3gt3xs5o
    @user-rh3gt3xs5o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Russia is tired of Mark Zuckerberg 😂

  • @wagbagsag
    @wagbagsag 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    StarFISH prime. Not starSHIP prime! C’mon WSJ, help me take you seriously

    • @randyboisa6367
      @randyboisa6367 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I thought it was Geidi prime, or Optimus prime, or even Amazon prime.

    • @cyotedude
      @cyotedude 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I choose not to take them seriously. WSJ as with all other media, are for-profit and will sell whatever brings in the revenue, or whatever capitulates with the current power. Recommend: listen to sources, but give credence only to fact-based believability. I always ask: What are your sources.

    • @mapache-ehcapam
      @mapache-ehcapam 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      To be fair Starfish sounds like the wrong name

    • @morris9524
      @morris9524 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Don't have to be agitated about it, your agitation is agitating my agitation

  • @mikefarrar3403
    @mikefarrar3403 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    I’m American and I know that we have already put that up there long before Russia

    • @MONTEZZ90
      @MONTEZZ90 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      U ppl think everything is from you and one can’t do anything before you guys. Joke .. even the Chinese are ahead of US

    • @MuantanamoMobile
      @MuantanamoMobile 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Even the Boeing X-37 robotic space planes...have been carrying out such tests for years. And can be used to eliminate their satellites. If true...this would just be levelling the playing filed again, and is unlikely to work in the way fear-mongered s it makes zero sense. The nuke-powered battery EMP-Satellite however makes more sense.

  • @threeMetreJim
    @threeMetreJim 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    They've had an anti-satellite capability for years. You've never heard of the satellite that releases another and then that releases another that could be used as a kinetic impactor at short notice (cosmos 2519, 2521, cosmos 2542, 2543 + rocket powered projectile)? Apparently this 'newer' threat is nuclear powered, not a nuclear (explosive) weapon. Enough power to jam satellites over a large area, to prevent surveillance, not to physically destroy them.

    • @davidgoodnow269
      @davidgoodnow269 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, a lot of people seem to be missing that point . . . .

    • @defencebangladesh4068
      @defencebangladesh4068 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly

    • @blackmagnetica8714
      @blackmagnetica8714 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you forgot Kosmos 2499, probably the most sophisticated out of all

    • @jojolafrite90
      @jojolafrite90 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Huhuh. But that won't knock out all of society in one boom. Any nukes in space, yes.

    • @threeMetreJim
      @threeMetreJim 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jojolafrite90 Jamming GPS from above could well knock out a lot. A fair amount depends on it these days (mostly for accurate timing).

  • @Antisocial88
    @Antisocial88 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Those nukes are already up there.
    And we have nukes in space too.

    • @MinusMedley
      @MinusMedley 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂 Can see who this video was made for...

  • @Charlie-gf4mv
    @Charlie-gf4mv 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Im not here to defend Russia but having no cultural analysis in any of these news stories is mind numbing. Russia has been historically anti-nuclear in terms of space and seen it as a joint venture. At the height of the cold war there were countless joint space missions for gods sake. Many russians still see space as the ultimate frontier and the pride of their nation for their early achievements in space flight. A nuclear attack would be indiscriminate and damage russian assets equally. Damaging the last of their presence in orbit would be unthinkable for Russia, unless in an all out war of course.. .

    • @JigilJigil
      @JigilJigil 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Putin is crazy, 400000+ Russians soldiers are dead because of his invasion, he doesn't care about anything but himself.

    • @Bradgilliswhammyman
      @Bradgilliswhammyman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Treaty agreement to not militarize space...looks like Putin is breaking that.

  • @DakilangAtsoy
    @DakilangAtsoy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    It will also damage their own satellite if they do that.

    • @lordraydens
      @lordraydens 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      they have reserves

    • @Neo......
      @Neo...... 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      it won't

    • @DakilangAtsoy
      @DakilangAtsoy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Neo...... 🤔 nuclear blast in space will fry all unprotected satellites as what was explained happened in 1960. There’s no barriers in space so the radiation or disturbance will travel fast and strong.

    • @x-hale2899
      @x-hale2899 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Are you guys actually hearing yourselves? You've gone mad.

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@x-hale2899no see, Putin just says "no nukesies backsies" before he launches it and then it won't damage their stuff.

  • @maxbounce5736
    @maxbounce5736 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    So I guess, the Russian Strategic Shovels Program is more dangerous than the Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture or PWSA, a program undertaken by the Space Development Agency

    • @abdirhmanali6320
      @abdirhmanali6320 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I see what you did there 😂😂👊

    • @milanradovanovic3693
      @milanradovanovic3693 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      But those are NUCLEAR shovels, not just regular ones!

    • @maxbounce5736
      @maxbounce5736 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@milanradovanovic3693 Of course they are. Look, I’m no rocket scientist but isn’t it how shovels work?

    • @milanradovanovic3693
      @milanradovanovic3693 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@maxbounce5736 I am not sure that's why I am asking... Maybe they are planing to transport used shovels from Chernobil and target USA with those radiated shovels by throwing them from space. But then they would have to transport like millions of them from space, right 😂😂😂

  • @rustycann6887
    @rustycann6887 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    starfish prime test was in 1962

  • @kurdi98k
    @kurdi98k 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Wouldn't that ignite a direct full-scale war with the United States of America? One has to think what tremendous capabilities the U.S. has today if they achieved Starfish Prime over 6 decades ago.

  • @TerriAnnNiemeier-dy3no
    @TerriAnnNiemeier-dy3no 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Let the Aliens handle space

  • @olligesd9343
    @olligesd9343 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    I find it absolutely hilarious that these people are freaking out about it and making a big deal. You know we've probably had nukes in space for at least 5-8 years already.

    • @randyboisa6367
      @randyboisa6367 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Thats false. The DOD and Space force do not have nuclear weapons in space.

    • @NLjunkie
      @NLjunkie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      ​@@randyboisa6367why? cause they "told" you that? 🤦‍♂️

    • @brandtbollers3183
      @brandtbollers3183 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Brilliant Pebbles .Regan Regime.

    • @randyboisa6367
      @randyboisa6367 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@NLjunkie Yes my senile stumbling stuttering friend Joe Biden promised me there is no nukes in space, Karine Jean Pierre also affirmed it.

    • @randyboisa6367
      @randyboisa6367 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@NLjunkie Yes, my senile stuttering stumbling friend Joe told me, and Karine Jean Pierre affirmed it.

  • @markbishop1138
    @markbishop1138 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    We are in the day and time where anything can happen.

    • @jackashmore
      @jackashmore 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      But nothing ever happens

    • @lajoswinkler
      @lajoswinkler 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@jackashmore Except it does.

    • @randyboisa6367
      @randyboisa6367 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The only time anything ever happened was August 6th and 9th of 1945, since then the world has been one big boring politicly correct soap opera.

    • @distorteduzi
      @distorteduzi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jackashmorethey said the same about ukraine look at it now

    • @jackashmore
      @jackashmore 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@distorteduzi and look how it’s stalled out, just now Russia is finally making progress. I highly doubt much will come from it.

  • @haroldfeldt4987
    @haroldfeldt4987 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    This has bin there for 50 years. The sky is falling the sky is falling send money fast to Ukraine.

  • @jpl6596
    @jpl6596 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Theres no chance that we dont have them up there too.

    • @Neo......
      @Neo...... 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      we don't

    • @thelonewrangler1008
      @thelonewrangler1008 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly! This is definitely the military industrial complex getting one of their intelligence buddies to scare everyone into opening their wallets for "protection". We've been drawing up and bragging about theoretical space weapons for decades on top of having active programs like the X47b and SR72. The US, Russia, and China have all demonstrated they can shoot down satellites many years ago and how it would cause a domino effect taking out everyone's satellites. It's the part where they keep stressing its nuclear that gives it away as no real threat at all and just your everyday fear mongering

    • @jpl6596
      @jpl6596 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Neo...... oh, you think just because there's a "treaty" that would stop us?? You tapped there tons of rules/ agreements that the US don't follow. They'll just never tell you

  • @5lanediver
    @5lanediver 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    it is called “starfish prime” not “starship prime” - this is a very famous test/incident. and they literally said it just before you said it wrong.

  • @williamlloyd3769
    @williamlloyd3769 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    Thought this was a thing in 1970s. Nuclear weapons in space wouldn’t really require Russia to develop any new weapon components. EMP would have a huge impact on society. Don’t know what the new intelligence is and not sure why it was brought upon a public forum.

    • @barometricfunk
      @barometricfunk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      And it would fry their satellites just as much as it would ours.

    • @agapelove992
      @agapelove992 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Regan's Starwars

    • @BCAT3089
      @BCAT3089 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      to scare the public!

    • @Bluespicygreen
      @Bluespicygreen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah this is not new, every nation with nuclear weapons can do this. Both the USSR and the United States detonated nukes in space, we don’t do this now because it would hurt everyone plus kill people in the Chinese space station and the international space station. In summery it’s just dumb to do in our modern era.

    • @thomasbeachnaw9019
      @thomasbeachnaw9019 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That assumes that its even a nuclear weapons platform. Creating space debris is dangerous to all the world. The Chinese boasted of a laser to disable them, but a controlled EMP with a Faraday cage protecting its electronics if devised would be the most effective, non violent non damaging way to get what you want without crossing lines.

  • @danmiller2177
    @danmiller2177 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This is not new I've been knowing this for years...

  • @by.myself42
    @by.myself42 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    now we know why Zuck is building a bunker

    • @goulddddable
      @goulddddable 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the Reptilians know

  • @barryshaw5660
    @barryshaw5660 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    The Wall Street Journal has become a source of amusement.

  • @sheikhboyardee556
    @sheikhboyardee556 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Gosh, it's like the "October surprise" has come early this election.

    • @jefferydraper4019
      @jefferydraper4019 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Biden had a bad week and they needed help earlier than expected.
      Im betting the October surprise will be some way to halt the election...you know...to protect the democracy or something.🙄🙄🙄🙄

  • @profX-27
    @profX-27 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    the U.S. tested nukes in space after WW2

    • @Zegeebwah
      @Zegeebwah 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, I watched the video. Did you?

    • @profX-27
      @profX-27 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      not all the way through. my comment was more towards equivocating than an actual question.

  • @mopthermopther
    @mopthermopther 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Russia had a cow when Reagan said “ Star Wars “

  • @mitchellbutler7068
    @mitchellbutler7068 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That’s all very interesting, but could you tell me why Putin is drinking heavily?

    • @greggemerer8251
      @greggemerer8251 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Great, reading the Sun again for your news?

  • @stevestovall9901
    @stevestovall9901 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Nuclear powered does not mean nuclear bomb

  • @Freedom4all31
    @Freedom4all31 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    As much money as the U.S. spends on defense (more than the 9 counties combined) we should have to worry about anything from anywhere. In all fairness to the military, half of it probably never leaves the DC area. Didn't we see this in Space Cowboys?

    • @cryora
      @cryora 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm sure they leave the DC area, but they go back to that area because that's where all the defense companies that sell to the military and government are headquartered.

    • @k333rl
      @k333rl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      it's not that we spend more than any other country. it's that the other countries don't spend a dime on their own defense and rely on a 100 year old alliance to watch their backs.

    • @Freedom4all31
      @Freedom4all31 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope- we spend more than the next 9 countries combined, including China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. @@k333rl

    • @Freedom4all31
      @Freedom4all31 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats also where the crooked politicians get kick backs from their so called lobbyists.@@cryora

    • @sinistereleven9145
      @sinistereleven9145 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@k333rl , we spend more than any other country and what 100-year alliance, are you a head in the sand democrat.

  • @Kai-ic4mp
    @Kai-ic4mp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So…. The us “defense” sector needs more money again…. Wow I’m surprised there is not a little bottle of cocaine in the presentation 😂

  • @larynOneka8080
    @larynOneka8080 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    If Russia shouldn't feel threatened by NATO expansion then the U.S. shouldn't feel threatened by Russia expanding into space.

    • @appleintosh
      @appleintosh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's not how things work

    • @MuantanamoMobile
      @MuantanamoMobile 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂 two can play that came...what's good for the goose...

  • @avazjon1
    @avazjon1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mr. Vladimir Putin said that Russia is against developing nukes in the space. Meanwhile, this video says the opposite. 💀

  • @ADKaizenProductions
    @ADKaizenProductions 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    They essentially made real life 007 GoldenEye emp based satellite weapon.

  • @timedwards5600
    @timedwards5600 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Like we don't

  • @chocolat-kun8689
    @chocolat-kun8689 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    When the US does this: Look at this, we made something that will keep the world align.
    When other countries does this: THIS IS DESTABLIZING, THIS IS TYRANNY!!!

    • @AlJebra
      @AlJebra 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you ever pause to think of why that is? Russia, Iran, China, North Korea are totalitarian societies that invade and threaten neighboring countries, throw journalists in prison and 'disappear' opposition political candidates. The US... well, come to think of it, that's pretty much what the Democrats are doing.

    • @appleintosh
      @appleintosh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Both of those statements are true, and if you think it's hypocrisy then you have no understanding of western global hegemony.

  • @GardenerEarthGuy
    @GardenerEarthGuy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As if the US doesn't have nukes in space....

  • @motorcyclemichael2182
    @motorcyclemichael2182 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Star Wars?!

  • @maverick257
    @maverick257 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great idea❤

  • @sithlordbilly4206
    @sithlordbilly4206 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sounds like the U.S.A. wants excuses to put their own weapons into space! 😮

  • @BBme
    @BBme 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    If US claims this, means US already doing this!

  • @sashanksingh6714
    @sashanksingh6714 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This could be dangerous. Even an astray satellite can do a lot of damage.

  • @RandomGuy-nm6bm
    @RandomGuy-nm6bm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Lol, love the subtle threatening sounding violins as Putin appears.

    • @jannguerrero
      @jannguerrero 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It's propaganda piece when they're trying to emotionally manipulate you

  • @LUCKY1i1K7NG
    @LUCKY1i1K7NG 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Starfish or starship prime, which one is it

    • @caseykelso1
      @caseykelso1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Doesn't anybody remember Ronald Reagan or are you all too young to realize it he put up Star Wars program go look it up youngsters don't be so afraid this is the problem with youth of America they don't read and learn and know nothing about our history half of you people don't even remember 9/11😂😂😂

  • @colinfitzgerald8221
    @colinfitzgerald8221 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Since when did the plot from "GoldenEye" become a reality?! 🤷‍♂🤔

  • @rogerparrett3242
    @rogerparrett3242 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Funny how liberals laughed at Trump when he announced the creation of the Space Force. Now liberals are scrambling to blame him for (supposedly) Russian space nukes...😂😂😂

    • @jefferydraper4019
      @jefferydraper4019 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The sheep theyre talking to only hear what theyre allowed to hear.

  • @charleswhatley5510
    @charleswhatley5510 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Does anyone know how to use Google? Russia used a missile to destroy their satellite in 2021.

    • @heinzletzte.6385
      @heinzletzte.6385 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      pretty sure they censor these things soon

    • @larrymunn5279
      @larrymunn5279 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think I remember that.. I know there have been many attempts to bring down starlink systems via intrusion as shooting them down one at a time would be a waste of time, but seemingly none have been very successful with active management.
      They had more success bringing Canadian power grids offline. For whatever reason. Spite, I guess lol.

    • @jojolafrite90
      @jojolafrite90 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Google has stopped working years and years ago. Corporate greed killed it.

  • @AjeetMulkhusRaiOfficial
    @AjeetMulkhusRaiOfficial 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why US can do anything in or outside earth like nuking in space without everyone's consent and act like an angel 😳

  • @rogersmith8480
    @rogersmith8480 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    WSJ, what did the U.S. do to cause Russia to do this? Back in 1962, the U.S. placed nukes near Russia's border which started The Cuban missile crisis. When the U.S. removed the nukes, the Cuban missile crisis ended.

  • @rogerbing5314
    @rogerbing5314 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Smoke and mirrors to take your eyes off what really is going on .

    • @soloslim544
      @soloslim544 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I see it...

    • @darkNovaskar
      @darkNovaskar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's really going on? Let's see if we're on the same page

    • @TheCrazyMoparDude68
      @TheCrazyMoparDude68 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@darkNovaskarthis is fake intel to get more aid for Ukraine. Russia isn’t a threat to the US now, so they have to create a threat. Scare the people into believing that Russia is a real threat and they will approve of hundreds of billions of dollars for Ukraine. And it will also help Biden come election time.

  • @oaka7616
    @oaka7616 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Faraday shield sales just went through the roof

  • @sigmaparabellum8479
    @sigmaparabellum8479 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The EMP weapon in the space is very old, I believe Rusia have a new way to generate electromagnetic pulses, we see in the evolved of Rusia electronic warfare.

  • @jenspettersson4070
    @jenspettersson4070 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Well boys i reckon this is it"

  • @CouncilO5
    @CouncilO5 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Electro magnetic impulse can also hit the high flying bombers and fighters , so it would make harder to be unnoticed for planes

  • @grooveman222
    @grooveman222 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Meanwhile two real wars are happening in real time back here on earth, with no end in sight.

  • @jishan763
    @jishan763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We need Meek mill as kang the Conquerer for space detonation 😉

  • @killosama72
    @killosama72 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember this movie.
    Space Cowboys with Clint Eastwood, James Gardner and Tommy. Lee Jones.

  • @Cier433
    @Cier433 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I only see a cheap excuse to justify the US making such weapons.

    • @monash4250
      @monash4250 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The US already does have such weapons. That's the blatant ugly hypocrisy.

  • @erock736
    @erock736 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “Russian nukes in outer space.” 😂😂
    Man, the 21st century is just way too ridiculous to not laugh at it.

  • @mikejezek5214
    @mikejezek5214 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    The Fine Print: Politicians are looking to cash in on sweetheart deals with aerospace companies to create a countermeasure. Media promotes stories like this for public buy-in. (To bad that contract cash can't be put towards Jim and Jane American.)

    • @mantonesei9097
      @mantonesei9097 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      All of a sudden we have UFO's everywhere, Russian nukes in space, time to boost the military spending

  • @akiyamayusuke
    @akiyamayusuke 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    When the US accuses Russia of doing something, it usually means:
    1. It's probably a lie;
    2. The US itself is doing the same or something worse.

    • @Pnaraasi94
      @Pnaraasi94 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah, it's the other way around. Whenever Russia accuses anyone of anything there's a near-100% chance they have done that very same thing themselves, are currently doing it, or are about to do it in the immediate future.

  • @r3dp1ll
    @r3dp1ll 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What a freaking joke. Using nuclear bombs to destroy satellites ... Yeah of course.

  • @prabhubharathan
    @prabhubharathan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hype: Russia detonates nuclear bombs in space
    Reality: Russia sent Pootin's farts to space

  • @abdullahahmed2409
    @abdullahahmed2409 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    WSJ Actual Meaning: US wants to deploy nuclear weapons in space but can't do it without saying it feels threatened and doing it for a just cause.

  • @isiosi
    @isiosi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I know jump cuts are not nice to look at sometimes, but using morph cuts in a journalistic medium is unethical.

  • @comrade9374
    @comrade9374 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All the treaty agreements no longer bidding 😂

  • @trevorsutherland5263
    @trevorsutherland5263 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    As usual, it takes some time for us to get the full picture. Russian MoD recently reported to Putin they identified about 50 military, and 250 commercial satellites that actively participate in the war against them. They didn't specify how, only that this is an issue we need to "resolve".

  • @Insightsphere_
    @Insightsphere_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I am getting "Saddam has WMD" vibe from this video

    • @caravanstuff2827
      @caravanstuff2827 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Me too..that space plane has been going up a lot lately!!.🤔

  • @gwendolynmcgrath7697
    @gwendolynmcgrath7697 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was a “STAR WARS TREATY”

  • @MuramatsuInosuke
    @MuramatsuInosuke 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The old school narrator said "Starfish Prime"😂

    • @mikerodix4800
      @mikerodix4800 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's what it was called

    • @MuramatsuInosuke
      @MuramatsuInosuke 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @mikerodix4800 The new narrator is ruining the whole program then! I like Starfish Prime waaaaaaay better! Lol!

  • @deborahtbowers4324
    @deborahtbowers4324 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Well my question is, when are we as a planet of humans,together, stop hating and waring and killing one another??? When will we move forward with positive energy and realize that we all benefit by working together and being ONE FAMILY, HUMAN!!! No war!, no killing, no more!! Imagine that! And our higher dimensional brothers and sisters can come and help us along our way, being a part of a PEACEFUL galactic FAMILY!!!! It's primarily old energy world leaders holding us back!!!! May Love and Peace be ours, ALL OF US, SOONER rather than LATER! The choice is ours!!!

    • @daveb2280
      @daveb2280 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would settle for an ounce of peace. The U.S. and the world is consumed with hate, greed, and power. Nearly all of our elected politicians are full board corrupt and don't even bother hiding it anymore. We are headed fast down that one way street called Rapture: Trials and Tribulations. That time can't come soon enough.

    • @robertonavarro7713
      @robertonavarro7713 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Humans will continue killing one another until the very last day of this earth. It all started when Cain killed his rother Abel. 😢

    • @diamanteduul8084
      @diamanteduul8084 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe it's YOU who is still on the gross/primal plane with your perceptions... Do you call the tide evil when it engulfs the beach? Or the Sun a tyrant when it bares down you on a blistering day? What's the difference between a human taking a life compared to old age ending it? I don't fully subscribe to these ideas, but they are interesting nonetheless. I seek to try see things without bias.

  • @k333rl
    @k333rl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    we've had the F-15 for a long time.

    • @toxicgracie3772
      @toxicgracie3772 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And it's still the best fighter ever (undefeated)

  • @samasiaskipperable
    @samasiaskipperable 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One would think they would use lasers to destroy satellites not nukes.

  • @ciscornBIG
    @ciscornBIG 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ask yourself: if tucker carlson hadn't interviewed putin, would we be hearing about this?

    • @jefferydraper4019
      @jefferydraper4019 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Biden admin and the establishment hacks got desperate.

  • @OfficialSethro
    @OfficialSethro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A nuke is a bit extreme for a satellite

  • @roe85
    @roe85 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I guess MW2 (2009) is coming to light right in our faces. 🤔

  • @emteiks
    @emteiks 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It can be helpful to notice that the opposite of what Putin says is very often a true and useful communicate. So "we have always been categorically against and are now against the deployment of nuclear weapons in space" should read: "we are confident and invested to the deployment and use of nuclear weapons in space". It takes only a moment to learn. Another example could be "We do not have any intention to invade Ukraine, these are just exercises"... we all already know what he really meant.

  • @ducpat
    @ducpat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And nothing about "OUR" secret space plane we sent up there first?

  • @WHYsauce
    @WHYsauce 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We got star wars irl before gta 6

  • @DavidDemiseOfficial
    @DavidDemiseOfficial 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If only we put so much into things that create rather than destroy.

  • @Teddy_Graham
    @Teddy_Graham 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Those who has the higher station has the power.

  • @mikerodix4800
    @mikerodix4800 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Nukes in space make no difference when you already have submarines that do the same thing better

    • @1serious0mfr
      @1serious0mfr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right, like ICBM exists and they've existed for a while now

    • @thelemon5069
      @thelemon5069 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Submarines do not have the capability of knocking out satellite communications

  • @nightwaves3203
    @nightwaves3203 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was wondering where that guy on the side of the road with the sign saying THE WORLD ENDS TOMORROW went. Glad he made it to NYC and got a job.

  • @chocolatepotato5469
    @chocolatepotato5469 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What if theyre working on a way to prevent their tech and satalites from being affected by emps?... if thats possible, this might be him beginning to test it. Imagine the advantage of using multiple emps while being the only one with electical infrastructure and quick communication........ they're not strong enough to beat the world, so why not kneecap it first to even the playing field.

  • @davidmichaels4285
    @davidmichaels4285 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hasn't Golden Eyes satellites have been in orbit for 30 years or so

  • @summerlove1944
    @summerlove1944 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    History repeats itself.

  • @mxolisithusi9054
    @mxolisithusi9054 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One against many weapons? Interesting

  • @genericname268
    @genericname268 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    US: Russian tech is obsolete
    Also US: Russia has space nukes!

  • @prodigalpriest
    @prodigalpriest 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bikini Bottom will never be the same again.

  • @gegwen7440
    @gegwen7440 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now I wonder just what the US has been up to for decades up there ?

  • @user-mm6vk9ow3r
    @user-mm6vk9ow3r 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    не нужно уничтожать население и территории, если можно уничтожить связь. Гуманно.

  • @user-pq9ji7kt4l
    @user-pq9ji7kt4l 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I assumed they had those years ago…..

  • @adityaprasad9759
    @adityaprasad9759 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ohh, comon. Nukes, in space ?😮

  • @snails6997
    @snails6997 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anyone have "Space Nukes" on the apocalypse bingo? I just got the "Rogue AI" last month with news about SORA.