I love how one half of this comments is religion vs. evolution and the other is people being bummed evolution took away our tails so we can't be catgirls
I just like science, as long as we look at it for what it is and not what we want it to be. Food for thought Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. th-cam.com/video/Dii6Aor7nH4/w-d-xo.html The Programming of Life th-cam.com/video/00vBqYDBW5s/w-d-xo.html As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpected-an exquisite ‘language’ composed of some 3 billion genetic letters. “One of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,” says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., “was that DNA actually stores information-the detailed instructions for assembling proteins-in the form of a four-character digital code” It is hard to fathom, but the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopaedia Britannica-an incredible 384 volumes” worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves! Yet in their actual size-which is only two millionths of a millimeter thick-a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and “there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written” (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334). Who or what could miniaturize such information and place this enormous number of ‘letters’ in their proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual? Could evolution have gradually come up with a system like this? This type of high-level information has been found to originate only from an intelligent source. Let’s first consider some of the characteristics of this genetic ‘language.’ For it to be rightly called a language, it must contain the following elements: an alphabet or coding system, correct spelling, grammar (a proper arrangement of the words), meaning (semantics) and an intended purpose. Scientists have found the genetic code has all of these key elements. “The coding regions of DNA,” explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, “have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language” The only types of communication considered high-level are human languages, artificial languages such as computer and Morse codes and the genetic code. No other communication system has been found to contain the basic characteristics of a language. Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that “DNA is like a software program, only much more complex than anything we’ve ever devised.” For instance, a book such as Homer’s Iliad contains information, but is the physical book itself information? No, the materials of the book-the paper, ink and glue contain the contents, but they are only a means of transporting it. If the information in the book was spoken aloud, written in chalk or electronically reproduced in a computer, the information does not suffer qualitatively from the means of transporting it. “In fact the content of the message,” says professor Phillip Johnson, “is independent of the physical makeup of the medium” (Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, 1997, p. 71). The same principle is found in the genetic code. The DNA molecule carries the genetic language, but the language itself is independent of its carrier. The same genetic information can be written in a book, stored in a compact disk or sent over the Internet, and yet the quality or content of the message has not changed by changing the means of conveying it. As George Williams puts it: “The gene is a package of information, not an object. The pattern of base pairs in a DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA molecule is the medium, it’s not the message” (quoted by Johnson, p. 70). So to believe that the genetic code gradually evolved in Darwinian style would break all the known rules of how matter, energy and the laws of nature work. In fact, there has not been found in nature any example of one information system inside the cell gradually evolving into another functional information program. Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explains that genetic information is primarily an instruction manual and gives some examples. He writes: “Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, “Take a ¼-inch nut,” a mutation might say, “Take a ⅜-inch nut.” Or instead of “Place the round peg in the round hole,” we might get “Place the round peg in the square hole” … What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in one step-say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio” (Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41).
Humans never had tails, this is just a tale. When has anyone discovered fossils that show it? This ridiculous notion is like assuming another vehicle that has 4 wheels must have come from the same company factory that the one you have did.
+The Duck Knight That's thanks to the evolution of intelligence, or specifically evolution of control mechanisms in the form of central nervous system.
Hyper Nova evolution is not a fact it’s a theory. Learn the difference. Interpretations of data and evolutionary explanations are not facts. Direct observable evidence of an organism evolving to another is evidence. And anyone cans grasp these evolutionary explanations, but that doesn’t mean they are true. You made a fallacy “if you don’t accept evolution, then it’s okay, but your inability to understand isn’t an argument against.” Which assumes “if you don’t accept evolution, then you don’t understand it, but if you understand it, then. You must accept it.” Lol which is laughable...
@@icegunz5872 You should look up the definition of a scientific theory and then get back to us. Gravity is a theory. Cell theory is a theory. Is gravity and our cells fake too?
@@patobanana4909 Here's a tip..Why don't YOU RELAX a little instead of being the grammar police! I am writing for effect, not perfection of grammar. I have always placed five to eight grades ahead on all my grammar and spelling in school. I went to the regionals in spelling bees and read all my encyclopedias before entering high school. I don't need your "help". Using these tiny keyboards on mobile devices lacking functionality causes me to be creative. Arrogant atheists and materialists always love to talk on any subject other than SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE...that is what drives them nuts! They complain, curse, strawman, lie, etc. in order to hide their deficient studies on the subject matter. I'd be rich if I had a dollar for every time the silly people avoided the EVIDENCE. You've said NOTHING to add to the discussion. Try this...either agree with my statement instead of using DISTRACTION TECHNIQUES of correcting me...OR...use SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE to disprove it. It's that simple . Oh that's right...you CAN'T. You see, I only write about that which I KNOW. I don't merely PRETEND like the silly materialists and atheists to understand the subject matter. You should try it! I also don't sugarcoat the EVIDENCE that makes silly atheists uncomfortable as so many apologists attempt to do. FACTS matter in SCIENCE and PHILOSOPHY, not whether someone gets butt-hurt over those facts.
I am sorry, but evolution is a myth because I will adamantly ignore basic logic and reason to recognize evolution. Also, I will cherry pick information to support my argument and, when encountered with other information that threatens or up ends my claims, I will ignore it and not consider it. I will use every fallacious argument possible to say you are wrong and I am right.
Found the guy who has never taken any biology, chemistry, or physics class class and try to use linguistic impact, like saying magic and sprouting, to make a point to undermined logical evidence. Scientist have found basics proteins in meteorites, and even Mars, that reside in you at this every moment. Scientist have determined that life was not sudden, I dont know why you make the use of monkeys sprouting a bad thing since thats what happened in the bible, and it look nearly a billion years from a single living cell to become a simple organism like fish, and half a billion years to get there to here. To put in into perspective how long these processes happened, by the time you are 32, you are a billion seconds old. Taking biology and chemistry courses co-currently, you can understand why and how this happens.
CaseNumber00 This so called "logical evidence" undermines itself. The universe is far to young and small to produce life naturally. Abiogenisis is impossible. Just give it a million years and I guess dogs will turn into dragons. Just "give it enough time".
@Hamster All they do is mindlessly recite creationist websites without ever having thought through them and done any proper research while putting aside their huge biases.
I was an avid evolutionist my entire life until I went to see a wooly mammoth exhibition. That was when I realised just how poorly our science story represents reality. Unfortunately neither evolution nor creation seems to provide an adequate answer for what I'm seeing.
@@adifferentangle7064 learn about practical design, coding, entropy, finance, logistic and management. then search about intelligent design. You will see how human designed is from ground up to create civilization. Tailbone to sitting for a long time, which needed to create tools, which is one of the pillar of civilization Mouth connected to lung so human can speak, which is another pillar of civilization Special foot to support ability to throw thing, which compensate for humanity weakness caused by 70% energy focused on brain, another pillar of civilization And plenty other
Well in a democracy the population of every country gets what they deserve / vote for. So depending on what you vote for, you might end up with a hard cord creationist as vice-president or one that can't even spell potato (Dan Quayle). But it can get far worse: Italy got Berlusconi (not once, but four times) and in the last election even elected a comedian (by job, not by behavior), Germans thought that Hitler would be a nice guy and elected him, Venezuelans elected Chavez and Maduro to increase their average standard of living, Turkey went several times for Erdogan (who banned evolution from the school curriculum as being far too difficult to be understood by Turkish pupoils) and in the first free democratic election for ages, the Egyptian population decided to elect fundamentalist religious nut Morsi who of course quickly shut down democracy. So it can get worse.
But most of that 98.7% resemblence are introns. Thus, we safely said that our miniscle parts, exons, of that 98.7% resemblence are significantly different from chimpanzee. ✌️
William, that sadly shows a failure of them to do their own research to back up their point of view. What they should say if they don't know the answer to your questions is that they don't know, but that they will be willing to research it and come back with an answer. Shutting down the debate by banning you from the room is no the answer and never will be.
@@creationismistruth551 out of the nearly 8 billion people on this planet and the millions that have gone before NOT ONE PERSON knows what existed or occurred prior to the big bang or the Planck Epoch to be more specific so how do you know?
@@TheTruthKiwi simple logic. We all know the universe is not eternal and had a beginning correct? Scientists referr to this beginning as the moment of creation otherwise known as the big bang according to scientists the big bang is a massive expansion of matter well what caused this expansion? We have never seen information come from nothing so why is it that scientist assume this must have been the case for the universe? The only logicsl conclusion would be that their is a god.
@@creationismistruth551 nope. Scientists do not call it the moment of "creation", they call it the natural origin of our local universe. They don't know what existed or occurred immediately prior to the planck epoch. Nobody does. They don't know that there was "nothing" prior. For all we know the cosmos could have existed in some natural form (most likely a quantum state) for eternity. That is much more logical, probable and likely than an omnipotent entity from another dimension magically creating everything from nothing. You are making an argument from ignorance and incredulity. You don't know how or why the universe originated therefore gods. That is simply a fallacy.
@@alexwilson1140 No they don't. It is all people that use God of the gaps, misinformation, blank claims they hope are true, and/or have no concept of the scientific method. Like when a creationist says evolution is not observable or it is just a theory they show they don't understand certain scientific terminology. Observable and theory have very different scientific definitions than the common usage of the words. Many creationists would say the fussion of our two chromosomes is not evidence for evolution however they do not fully understand the scientific method. The reason it is evidence is because it shows a biological nested hierarchy. All hypotheses and theories must make predictions in which the hypothesis or theory can be falsified (disproven). Predictions are experiments and what all tests and evidence stems from. The theory of evolution predicts all biological systems will be arranged in a nested hierarchy. Science works by gathering much evidence through constant experiments. No single theory or hypothesis is based off of a single piece of evidence. So alone our fused chromosomes do not seem to mean much but it is about the constant accurate predictions the theory of evolution makes.
I understand the theory of evolution but, personally, find the existence of God and intelligent creation far more logical and probable than everything coming together by chance. It's my opinion and justification, doesn't make yours any less valued.
After reading comments for more than haft an hours I came to the conclusion that people those are arguing against evolution know nothing about biology. They just watch some youtube video or read an article to support their beliefs
@@Sheen023 After visiting your channel it is apparent to me that you are one of those people that only watch youtube video and become expert in the field.
The only people who deny science, including the Theory of Evolution, are those whose religious beliefs are debunked by science. There are no atheist creationists, nor essentially no educated in Biology creationists.
Evolution is the most beautiful story about life on Earth, an unbroken thread of living organisms that managed to pass over their genes. And here we are now, able to understand it, as Carl Sagan said: "We are a way for the cosmos to know itself".
Food for thought Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. th-cam.com/video/Dii6Aor7nH4/w-d-xo.html The Programming of Life th-cam.com/video/00vBqYDBW5s/w-d-xo.html As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpected-an exquisite ‘language’ composed of some 3 billion genetic letters. “One of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,” says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., “was that DNA actually stores information-the detailed instructions for assembling proteins-in the form of a four-character digital code” It is hard to fathom, but the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopaedia Britannica-an incredible 384 volumes” worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves! Yet in their actual size-which is only two millionths of a millimeter thick-a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and “there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written” (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334). Who or what could miniaturize such information and place this enormous number of ‘letters’ in their proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual? Could evolution have gradually come up with a system like this? This type of high-level information has been found to originate only from an intelligent source. Let’s first consider some of the characteristics of this genetic ‘language.’ For it to be rightly called a language, it must contain the following elements: an alphabet or coding system, correct spelling, grammar (a proper arrangement of the words), meaning (semantics) and an intended purpose. Scientists have found the genetic code has all of these key elements. “The coding regions of DNA,” explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, “have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language” The only types of communication considered high-level are human languages, artificial languages such as computer and Morse codes and the genetic code. No other communication system has been found to contain the basic characteristics of a language. Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that “DNA is like a software program, only much more complex than anything we’ve ever devised.” For instance, a book such as Homer’s Iliad contains information, but is the physical book itself information? No, the materials of the book-the paper, ink and glue contain the contents, but they are only a means of transporting it. If the information in the book was spoken aloud, written in chalk or electronically reproduced in a computer, the information does not suffer qualitatively from the means of transporting it. “In fact the content of the message,” says professor Phillip Johnson, “is independent of the physical makeup of the medium” (Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, 1997, p. 71). The same principle is found in the genetic code. The DNA molecule carries the genetic language, but the language itself is independent of its carrier. The same genetic information can be written in a book, stored in a compact disk or sent over the Internet, and yet the quality or content of the message has not changed by changing the means of conveying it. As George Williams puts it: “The gene is a package of information, not an object. The pattern of base pairs in a DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA molecule is the medium, it’s not the message” (quoted by Johnson, p. 70). So to believe that the genetic code gradually evolved in Darwinian style would break all the known rules of how matter, energy and the laws of nature work. In fact, there has not been found in nature any example of one information system inside the cell gradually evolving into another functional information program. Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explains that genetic information is primarily an instruction manual and gives some examples. He writes: “Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, “Take a ¼-inch nut,” a mutation might say, “Take a ⅜-inch nut.” Or instead of “Place the round peg in the round hole,” we might get “Place the round peg in the square hole” … What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in one step-say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio” (Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41).
How pathetic that we live during a time that when speaking of the science of Evolution we have to debase the conversation by talking about magic, ie, religious creation beliefs. I think it’s best to leave that to the magic believers and focus instead on reality, because no matter the evidence presented, a person who believes in creationism is never going to be persuaded.
Except that reality does not care about us, so why should we talk about it? The real world doesn't care what happens to us. We exist for no reason at all and when we die we are gone forever. So why should I care about the real world if it doesn't care about me?
@@mikeykitty1235 Because the world isn't a mean guy that doesn't care about you, but rather a fascinating place, with so many awesome things to explore. Some things on this world are just unbelievable beautiful.
HAHAHAHA! As the FANTASIES keep rolling on for silly evolutionists! They forget that their magical natural selection fairy isn't actually real! HAHAHAHA!!! If you have EVIDENCE show us the EVIDENCE where Chromosomes MAGICALLY ATTACH without deformation! HAHAHAHA!!! Go ahead show us the PROOF...what's that....crickets....OH I see your FANTASIES are okay with NO OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE. ...but someone else can't do the very same thing with a PROVEN DESIGN showing in DNA???? HYPOCRITES!!! BLIND IGNORANT FAITH has led you to your conclusions...that and you hate anything about life that is OBSERVATIONALLY AND OBVIOUSLY DESIGNED...RIGHT???
@@JohnCena8351 There is no such thing as beauty in a Godless universe silly! Your little electrochemical reactions are just making you feel a certain way is just an accident...there is meaninglessness and purposeless existence for you silly atheistic materialists!
It doesn’t matter how much evidence science has. Creationists will just claim it’s all part of God’s design. Creationists now claim DNA proves Gods design.
So I've got a few questions now, as biology fascinates me but sadly I don't know much of it 1. From what I understood, then our DNA is stored inside our chromosomes? 2. Are chromosomes inside every cell in our bodies? 3. What is exactly the 'genome'? I think I'm getting it wrong and really would like to get the bigger picture, so if anyone could enlighten me It'd be greatly appreciated Also great video, as always
1. Yes. Basically, DNA is coiled around charged proteins called histones, which then further coil to form a very compact version of DNA called chromosomes. This is usually seen only during cell division. 2. Yes, DNA is, but not always in the form of chromosomes. 3. Genome is the entire sequence of base pairs that makes up an organism's DNA. :)
ya the other people got it, but just something to add about question 2. You have the exact same DNA stored in every cell, be it a nerve cell or an intestinal cell. However, which genes are expressed (thus what proteins are made) varies from cell type to cell type
@@kvazac4432 understanding what happened hundreds of million years ago is not possible to the degree to form a theory.if 2 or more scientists reach the same conclusions,does it make it a theory?
I love going through the comments section and seeing all the people trying to use arguments against evolution that were refuted 100 years ago and people like Ray Comfort still profit from.
If you ike that, you should read the book, Refuting Evolution. We had to analyze it in class and present the misconceptions about evolution. It was a very tiring and most especialy annoying work because there are a lot of misconception in there. Great read, if you want to tear your eyes out about how little (even educated) people know about evolution
@@danicaaustria4146 Let me guess three of them. There are no transitional fossils. Evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics (or as Creationists tend to call, the Law of Entropy). If we evolved from monkeys, then why are there still monkeys?
From step 1 to step 2 we need billion of years "evolution" .... I have the desire to know why you said "How stuff really warks" when you can't know anything????
@@theyaduvanshiindian391 how does one go about conducting research on biogenesis? Everyone is so fixated on evolution yet it seems no scientist wants to dip their fingers into the untapped wealth of recognition that could come from making discoveries in abiogenesis. You can ignore the origin of life and only focus on the origin of species but the theory is incomplete without knowing how inorganic chemicals evolved into organic life forms. Why not also consider the origin of the first life forms?
@@Migger_29 No doubt. How could life "pop" into existence? And if it could how could that life sustain itself for more than a millisecond...or survive long enough to evolve necessary components for reproduction? All fascinating stuff!!
Post a video when you can explain #1 how everything came from nothing, and #2 how evolution could achieve and be based on the opposite of the natural law of nature that all decays, and #3 when you design a working human brain that can heal itself. It takes a billion times as much faith to believe the evolution religion of everything from nothing without God.
@@TruthChristians Hello. I'm no expert but 1) The phrasing is wrong. Nothing is commonly referred to as the lack of anything. This is not the correct definition for 'nothing' in your sentence. 2) Not everything 'decays'. Sand is formed from erosion of rocks but it is still seen as 'decaying'. But stars are from from many elements in space and the are not seen as decaying, rather as being born. So the answer to this argument is all based on wording. 3) This is a strawman. Evolution is not the assertion that a human can create or build another human, it is just the result of multiple tests, experiments and observations over time. As for Evolution being called a religion, it does not fit under it's definition. Nobody expects you to take it as the only truth, but you are taught about it because it has been proven as true. Just like history because it has been recorded and proven that it actually happened (even if not 100% accurately), like math because you can calculate it and use in the real world, and writing, because almost everybodyon Earth uses some form of writing. I hope this helps clear some of the misconceptions about evolution 👍
It's true. There are many false creation myths around the world. But what takes greater faith-to believe that the millions of intricately coordinated parts of a cell arose by random chance or to believe that the cell is the product of an intelligent mind.
@@mysticwine - and YET, strangely, no EVIDENCE is given by you. In fact, not only can you NOT demonstrate that a god exists, you clowns can't even demonstrate that ANYTHING PARANORMAL EXISTS. It's EXACTLY why not a penny of this money has ever been given away: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prizes_for_evidence_of_the_paranormal IF your god did create us, AND ON TOP OF IT, drive evolution to THIS CONCLUSION TODAY, he is even MORE OR A MORAL THUG THAN THE BIBLE SHOWS HIM TO BE. Just the simple fact that 5,000 PEOPLE DIE FROM CHOKING EACH YEAR BECAUSE OF "YOUR GOD'S AWESOME DESIGN FOR OUR BODY", PROVES THAT HE IS EITHER A COMPLETE *MORON* - OR *YOU* *ARE* FOR BELIEVING HE EXISTS. Occam's razor would then establish that YOU are the MORON.
Poor silly fool! DNA is the MOST SOPHISTICATED and COMPLEX and VOLUMINOUS CODE ever assembled. Prove that FACT wrong! Prove that a DESIGNER is not needed to create and assemble hardware and software with thousands upon thousands of DEPENDENCIES on separate MIRACULOUS mechanisms needed... we are all waiting! Just SHOW THE EVIDENCE for your silly BELIEFS and we will all be convinced! HAHAHAHA! Silly atheists don't even know you've been played! No the CHROMOSOMES could not have MIRACULOUSLY JOINED! Go find out why this fool is LYING. OR, just BELIEVE him by BLIND FAITH as you already exhibited for us! HAHAHAHA!
@@oriolvp4413 Look silly boy...your God Hatred has absolutely nothing to do with this silly evolutionary lie! ALL you have to do is EXACTLY what I challenged the maker of this video to do...provide ACTUAL EVIDENCE that a telomere translocation like this has EVER BEEN OBSERVED to change species or POSITIVELY increase information in an organism!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Yes....I LAUGH at your brainless FAITH!!! If it was about UNASSUMED SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that we have EVER OBSERVED...you could provide the PROOF. The reason you CAN'T provide EVIDENCE is because that FANTASY he spoke of...well it has NEVER OCCURRED in the history of OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCE...yet by BLIND IGNORANT FAITH...you BELIEVE anyways???? DESPITE the EVIDENCE!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 What a moronic way to address EVIDENCE!!! Oh...and did I mention that SCIENTISTS ALREADY KNOW AND WE HAVE OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE that our genomes ARE NOT even close to 98%...or 95%...or 90% similar to a chimpanzee???? Did you know that: "About 30 percent of all human proteins are identical in sequence to the corresponding chimp protein."...according to the chimpanzee genome project on wikipedia. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 And notice how CONVENIENTLY leave out the part where MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF CODE WERE.... IGNORED!!! Did you catch that silly boy? IGNORED because....because....because.... even the brightest scientists have emotional needs and BIASES. You share an emotional neediness for a Godless universe. That's why you're here...to BOLSTER your FAITH...in a FANTASY!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 By all means...please tell us all...what the PERCENTAGE alike our genomes are similar to a Chimpanzee when we DON'T IGNORE ANY OF THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE????????????? You've been PLAYED!!! You have been a SUCKER...a BIASED CYNIC...not a "skeptic" as you parade your silly FAITH AROUND as "SCIENCE"!!!! It isn't. It is being WILLFULLY IGNORANT!!!! CONGRATULATIONS on your OBVIOUS emotional hatred of God driving you to parrot such ridiculous drivel!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Now watch folks as he CAN'T PROVIDE EVIDENCE of GENOMIC similarity without "FORGETTING"...OOPS...or ACTUALLY IGNORING the ACTUAL EVIDENCE of the DNA CODE!!! HAHAHAHA!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 The maker of this video praised all his parrots....yet IGNORED my challenge of RRADILY AVAILABLE INFORMATION because he KNOWS this FANTASY never ACTUALLY happened!!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You people are such idiots to accept by FAITH alone....without an ounce of skepticism!!!!! It proves how BIASED you are!!! Silly boy! Lol.
In live near the countryside and spend my time in a wood. I always feel more related to animals than humans. I can stay all day until night int the wood, finding water, running and resting under a tree, I can find the north, I can say what hour it is by looking at the sky. I observe how nature changes with seasons and animals' behaviour. Trying to integrate. And I feel something sacred in it. A big conection to everything. And wild animals seem to have accepted my presence there. They are even curious when I am training. Not the same in cities with humans and theirs problems. They seem detached from reality and have a huge bunch of problems due to worl, social issues, predominance, power, politics... I always felt more like an animal, I know it sounds weird. So happy that my genes tell a different story humans are used to. We are part of everything Loved this video
Banm Alralmen “if iťs true why they call it theory” a coherent group of propositions formulated to explain a group of facts or phenomena in the natural world and repeatedly confirmed through experiment or observation: the scientific theory of evolution. - Google
Banm Alralmen “these chromosomes don’t look alike” Yes they do. That’s as if you told me that 2 + 2 = 5. There’s just nothing to explain why you’re wrong..
Evolution is easy to disprove. Also on a side note, maybe you are an evolutionist or a proponent of the idea. I was looking for some info on it. I could spend all day researching it but, it would be much easier to ask someone knowledgeable like it always is. Do you happen to know "if the theory is true, then why has no one suggested or attempted to deactivate the 2B gene in the ape creature. Maybe you or someone here can answer and provide a link with the available data including successful experiments. I get not running a trial like this on humans in reverse but, maybe this particular gene selection on ape's?
The book "Finding Darwin's God" is an interesting explanation of evolution. Written by the cell biologist Ken Miller. (A devout Catholic.) He wrote a follow-up called "Only A Theory" but I haven't read that.
I'm not a creationist, but all this video does is point out the very obvious and undeniable genetics we share, then applies an unbacked hypothesis that this must mean we have a common ancestor. This is done frequently and is a type of God-of-the-gaps argument. You take a bunch of well-known, indisputable data, then apply a baseless or at least extremely weak theory to fill in the gaps. The evidence for evolution is overwhelming, the evidence for a common ancestor for chimps and humans is pathetic.
On the contrary, our complex DNA proves evolution is nothing but a fairytale. You see, for one type of animal to morph into another requires the infusion of new information. The addition of a tail, a wing, a leg - all these need new information just like a computer program needs new codes to perform new tasks. Mutation rearranges or losses information but it never adds new ones so how does an organism evolve into a different kind with mutation? The creation of new information requires a mind and careful planning just like creating a new program to run on a computer. You don't get a car, a ship or an airplane out of random mutation. You get them from an intelligent designer.
There are many examples of mutations adding information. This has been a long held lie by creationists. For example can you explain how gene duplication cannot add information? We have seen genes duplicate then over time those new duplicated genes will undergo mutations f there own separate from the genes they came from thereby creating new protiens and features. So how is gene duplication (a mutation) not adding information?
@Tony Tony Wow what an intelligent rebuttal. Sorry but just because you are a simpleton that does not understand genetics it doesn't mean what I said is wrong.
The way you depicted the 48 to 46 chromosomes as evidence of evolution made the concept more concrete for me. If i ever encounter someone refuting evolution, I feel that I will now be able to clearly articulate why evolution accurately explains our reality. I’ll also save this video as a great reference as well 😉! Thank you and keep it up.
Thank you friend But your expertise is already needed For their is someone arguing against evolution in these comments right now *If you sort by newest the most recent comment should be one against evolution* **At time of comment**
Why argue with them,, Just tell them there is no God there is No hell,, where you will burn for all internet. And not to worry about it, live their life as a perverted fool if they choose to.
I am fascinated by Evolution. And I don't need a lego-builder-God to believe in God. I think God is presence but he doesn't interfere. But this, particularly Evolution and natural history, sharpens the question why God allows all this suffering. Well...the big turning point. For me God can't interfere, but he is there - ESPECIALLY in the suffering and that's why he hangs at the cross, suffering like us, instead of fighting back. ❤
Why Africa. Why did nature select the African Continent to evolve humanity? It’s a dry, seemingly barren place. Maybe there’s more there than meets the eye..
Luis Aldamiz, most vegans have slightly different reasoning from each other. like health, but if that says their better then you for it... they might be right but it's still rude. also, the majority of vegans don't want to get in conversations about whos better or worse based on their diets. (not that they dont think they have good reasoning for theirs)
Stated Clearly posted a really good video today on just that topic. It is called "DNA Evidence That Humans & Chimps Share A Common Ancestor: Endogenous Retroviruses"
- thank you for the interview, Mr Maincreationist. - np - do you have a favourite breed of dogs? - yes, my favourite is th... - thank you for the interview.
Most of the comments I see from creationists in this comment section is attacking abiogenesis, not evolution. This shows a deep misunderstanding of the theory of evolution. Don't confuse evolution with abiogenesis. The theory of evolution only explains that we are all related and come from a common ancestor. The theory does not explain how that first living organism came about. So anyone who claims that DNA can't make itself therefore evolution can't be true is making a strawman argument.
You're wrong. Abiogenesis is the start. Before that first life Evolved, it needed to form. You like to duck what is known by Evolutionists to be the greatest problem they have. Race cars without crossing the starting line. We could get in to how Richard Lenski's bacteria experiment shows how we would still be bacteria, given that 70,000 generations of e coli are still that, but we don't have to talk about how all we ever observe is things reproducing after themselves. If you don't need to have a start then you don't have a life form, so nothing can Evolve. Tell me this, do you think if abiogenesis was discovered in a lab, chemicals to straight up life via explosion, that it would be put at the beginning of every Evolution chapter? Cause it's the start, and they dang near do this with Urey Miller, which is just amino acids, not even life, just something used by life.
Also on a side note, maybe you are an evolutionist or a proponent of the idea. I was looking for some info on it. I could spend all day researching it but, it would be much easier to ask someone knowledgeable like it always is. Do you happen to know "if the theory is true, then why has no one suggested or attempted to deactivate the 2B gene in the ape creature. Maybe you or someone here can answer and provide a link with the available data including successful experiments. I get not running a trial like this on humans in reverse but, maybe this particular gene selection on ape's?
Too bad our vice president Mike Pence didn't study harder in biology class. It's sad that someone so scientifically illiterate is helping run this country.
Almost right with the Tír na nÓg. Ó is pronounced like the o in no or doe. Not like egg nog but reads more ‘noge.’ Like the sound of the o changes in not to note
@@somemagellanic look up regulatory sequences or RNA termination sequences. You think its all an accident almost everything that is living has similar ways of termination. You want to know something else. A lot of biochemists don’t use the word evolution ever you know why its simple. We have proteins that look the same and behave differently. Please educate yourself a lot of people don’t actually believe in this stupid theory we are learning things that a 200 year old theory cant explain. The fossil record is actually a terrible argument for evolution its perhaps the most flowed one. We once thought vestigial structures were useless the number for these structures was as high as 150 now we got 1 or 2 and there is still research being done on that.
Linean Taxonomy perhaps is one good illustration of how evolution works. The grouping of organisms prove how organisms share common ancestors. Like for example, sharks/class chondrichthies, dunkleosteus/placodermi and tuna/class ostheichthies shares a common gnathostomata/jawed fish ancestor. Those 3 fish groups were separated from hagfishes and lampreys/class agnatha because they do not have bone and yet, they all share a common ancestor which is a creature with hard backbone/subphylum vertebrata.
Food for thought Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. th-cam.com/video/Dii6Aor7nH4/w-d-xo.html The Programming of Life th-cam.com/video/00vBqYDBW5s/w-d-xo.html As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpected-an exquisite ‘language’ composed of some 3 billion genetic letters. “One of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,” says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., “was that DNA actually stores information-the detailed instructions for assembling proteins-in the form of a four-character digital code” It is hard to fathom, but the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopaedia Britannica-an incredible 384 volumes” worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves! Yet in their actual size-which is only two millionths of a millimeter thick-a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and “there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written” (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334). Who or what could miniaturize such information and place this enormous number of ‘letters’ in their proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual? Could evolution have gradually come up with a system like this? This type of high-level information has been found to originate only from an intelligent source. Let’s first consider some of the characteristics of this genetic ‘language.’ For it to be rightly called a language, it must contain the following elements: an alphabet or coding system, correct spelling, grammar (a proper arrangement of the words), meaning (semantics) and an intended purpose. Scientists have found the genetic code has all of these key elements. “The coding regions of DNA,” explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, “have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language” The only types of communication considered high-level are human languages, artificial languages such as computer and Morse codes and the genetic code. No other communication system has been found to contain the basic characteristics of a language. Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that “DNA is like a software program, only much more complex than anything we’ve ever devised.” For instance, a book such as Homer’s Iliad contains information, but is the physical book itself information? No, the materials of the book-the paper, ink and glue contain the contents, but they are only a means of transporting it. If the information in the book was spoken aloud, written in chalk or electronically reproduced in a computer, the information does not suffer qualitatively from the means of transporting it. “In fact the content of the message,” says professor Phillip Johnson, “is independent of the physical makeup of the medium” (Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, 1997, p. 71). The same principle is found in the genetic code. The DNA molecule carries the genetic language, but the language itself is independent of its carrier. The same genetic information can be written in a book, stored in a compact disk or sent over the Internet, and yet the quality or content of the message has not changed by changing the means of conveying it. As George Williams puts it: “The gene is a package of information, not an object. The pattern of base pairs in a DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA molecule is the medium, it’s not the message” (quoted by Johnson, p. 70). So to believe that the genetic code gradually evolved in Darwinian style would break all the known rules of how matter, energy and the laws of nature work. In fact, there has not been found in nature any example of one information system inside the cell gradually evolving into another functional information program. Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explains that genetic information is primarily an instruction manual and gives some examples. He writes: “Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, “Take a ¼-inch nut,” a mutation might say, “Take a ⅜-inch nut.” Or instead of “Place the round peg in the round hole,” we might get “Place the round peg in the square hole” … What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in one step-say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio” (Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41).
@@bilalsadain so you think we came from inanimate / inorganic materials? That violates the law of biogenesis. It is impossible for life to come from non life, even if it spans billions of years.
@@PlantChrist If you could at least understand that the theory of evolution is not saying that nothing created everything you maybe wouldnt be so against it. Its literally just change over time in organisms, that and nothing more. Not the creation of organisms, not the creation of the universe, just this.
Memento Mori even worse, it only explains what life does but doesn’t explain how the splitter came to be. Creationist argument nail them both. What I’m saying is the theory of evolution is sometimes correlated to the Big Bang.
@@PlantChrist Neither molecule or chemical. "Truth" and "Love" are human fictions. They arise out of the human imagination. They are stories we tell each other which allow us to cooperate and survive. Others include Money (perhaps the biggest - who doesn't believe in it), Justice, Mercy, Human Rights and (of course) God.
Food for thought Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. th-cam.com/video/Dii6Aor7nH4/w-d-xo.html The Programming of Life th-cam.com/video/00vBqYDBW5s/w-d-xo.html
If only there were ANY EVIDENCE PROVING that this man's silly FANTASY ever happened.... right! HAHAHAHA!!! By all means show us the EVIDENCE that this CAN HAPPEN TO PRODUCE SUPERIOR CODE!!! OH...that's right...you can't. This was just another farce that you BELIEVED! Loke the tooth fairy...the person who BELIEVES the fantasy will tell you there's EVIDENCE...but like the tooth fairy...you can't produce OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE OF IT EVER HAPPENING....FANTASY!!!
@@yeetri1034 No silly boy! He doesn't show proof... He tells you his fantasy and you buy into it because you're a sucker! HAHAHAHA!!! By all means... Show us any... And I mean any... Robertsonian translocation event that led to a positive increase in information! HAHAHAHA!!!! What's that???? Crickets chirping................ Right! NEVER HAPPENED! WHAT AN IGNORANT FOOL to FANTASIZE such an event that has NEVER been OBSERVED in the history of SCIENCE..so FANTASY is PROOF to you???? HAHAHAHA!!! SUCKERS!!!
Good job Joe you brought the evidence to creationists and disproved their myths . 👏👏👏👏👏 (This is not sarcasm I'm actually glad someone had the balls to make this video against creationism)
What evidence? Did they show a video of the missing link pregnant and showing the DNA mutating into a human? Showing the fusion. I am not a creationist
Sometimes mistakes are made when chromosomes are being copied during your conception or translated when you were in the womb. For you that just means the genes responsible for your toes called for 6 instead of 5.
@@edwardeduardo8561 we were created from water,due to the reducing atmosphere,the chemical evolution,then evolution kept on going on,we have many proof of evolution around us,one example is bacterial resistance to antibiotics due to r-plasmid in their cytoplasm,thisis seen because of use of antibiotics on them for last 100 years
Evolution is apparently a clumsy creator; everything it makes seems to fail and has to be done over. On the other hand, it does persist and never gives up.
In a way, you can say it is (though we have to be careful with the word "creator," but I understand you). Yes, this stuff is clumsy, and funnily enough, we have several mechanisms to repair those kinds of errors... as if it knows if fails a lot. Many proteins look around for errors by comparing it with a template and when something is wrong they cut it out and/or replaces it. But that has its fails too... it can even change the template! Evolution is a consequence of how life works. A consequence of reproduction. A consequence of replication. A consequence of natural selection. Evolution is a type of emergence. There is no way that evolution wouldn't exist in a set like this. Evolution is an inevitability of life -- and other things too.
I find that one can reconcile a Divine Creator and Evolution when one considers that the account of Creation found in the Bible isn't meant to be taken literally. When it is viewed as a poetic description of the balance between man and nature, as well as the relationship man can have with something greater than himself, Evolution, therefore, appears to be a completely logical explanation for the origin and progression of humanity, first set in motion by something beyond the clutches of the second law of Thermodynamics.
The Fox Romans 1 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world,[g] in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.
the bible was never wrong, it is how we interpret it for me I personally believe there's deep scientific explanations behind every single words in the bible and should not be taken too literally. the moment you distance science from the bible, you're already lost
@@redeemedchannel5580 So basically, you're saying we can't disprove the existence of god and therefore, he exists, which technically allows you to make litterally any claim AND you're calling me an idiot, which isn't an argument.
@@helpfulhazz5588 micro adaptations, not macro adaptations. Like you have people with different skin tones ect. But nowhere in your DNA can you prove how the human eye came to be. Evolution is stating we all came from unicellular life forms who got more and more complex. Adaptation is about adjusting to your environment but never does it claim to have creatures grow fins
@@alexandredube141 "micro adaptations, not macro adaptations." Evolution is micro adaptations, not macro adaptations? Could you clarify? "Like you have people with different skin tones ect. But nowhere in your DNA can you prove how the human eye came to be." While not every piece of life's puzzle has been found, we are steadily filling in the empty spaces as we discover more evidence. The eye most likely began with relatively rudimentary photoreceptors, which can be found even in single-celled organisms. These light-sensitive organelles proved useful for organisms that depended on the Sun for their metabolism. Over time, the photoreceptors became more complex. We actually have found a gene called PAX6 that helps determine how or if eyes are expressed. When it was altered in a mouse embryo, for instance, the mouse did not develop eyes at all. "Evolution is stating we all came from unicellular life forms who got more and more complex." That's not exactly what evolution itself is, but that is the most likely conclusion based on the evidence. "Adaptation is about adjusting to your environment but never does it claim to have creatures grow fins" I'll just cut to the chase and tell you the definition of biological evolution: it is the change in allele frequencies in a population of organisms over successive generations. So adaptation actually is evolution.
The thought of some great creator haviing created all of us is an impressive thought. But the thought of us evolving into what we are today from nothing is, to me, even more impressive.
Food for thought, Also look up "Law of Biogenesis" Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. th-cam.com/video/Dii6Aor7nH4/w-d-xo.html The Programming of Life th-cam.com/video/00vBqYDBW5s/w-d-xo.html As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpected-an exquisite ‘language’ composed of some 3 billion genetic letters. “One of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,” says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., “was that DNA actually stores information-the detailed instructions for assembling proteins-in the form of a four-character digital code” It is hard to fathom, but the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopaedia Britannica-an incredible 384 volumes” worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves! Yet in their actual size-which is only two millionths of a millimeter thick-a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and “there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written” (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334). Who or what could miniaturize such information and place this enormous number of ‘letters’ in their proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual? Could evolution have gradually come up with a system like this? This type of high-level information has been found to originate only from an intelligent source. Let’s first consider some of the characteristics of this genetic ‘language.’ For it to be rightly called a language, it must contain the following elements: an alphabet or coding system, correct spelling, grammar (a proper arrangement of the words), meaning (semantics) and an intended purpose. Scientists have found the genetic code has all of these key elements. “The coding regions of DNA,” explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, “have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language” The only types of communication considered high-level are human languages, artificial languages such as computer and Morse codes and the genetic code. No other communication system has been found to contain the basic characteristics of a language. Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that “DNA is like a software program, only much more complex than anything we’ve ever devised.” For instance, a book such as Homer’s Iliad contains information, but is the physical book itself information? No, the materials of the book-the paper, ink and glue contain the contents, but they are only a means of transporting it. If the information in the book was spoken aloud, written in chalk or electronically reproduced in a computer, the information does not suffer qualitatively from the means of transporting it. “In fact the content of the message,” says professor Phillip Johnson, “is independent of the physical makeup of the medium” (Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, 1997, p. 71). The same principle is found in the genetic code. The DNA molecule carries the genetic language, but the language itself is independent of its carrier. The same genetic information can be written in a book, stored in a compact disk or sent over the Internet, and yet the quality or content of the message has not changed by changing the means of conveying it. As George Williams puts it: “The gene is a package of information, not an object. The pattern of base pairs in a DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA molecule is the medium, it’s not the message” (quoted by Johnson, p. 70). So to believe that the genetic code gradually evolved in Darwinian style would break all the known rules of how matter, energy and the laws of nature work. In fact, there has not been found in nature any example of one information system inside the cell gradually evolving into another functional information program. Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explains that genetic information is primarily an instruction manual and gives some examples. He writes: “Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, “Take a ¼-inch nut,” a mutation might say, “Take a ⅜-inch nut.” Or instead of “Place the round peg in the round hole,” we might get “Place the round peg in the square hole” … What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in one step-say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio” (Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41).
Evolution is easy to disprove. Also on a side note, maybe you are an evolutionist or a proponent of the idea. I was looking for some info on it. I could spend all day researching it but, it would be much easier to ask someone knowledgeable like it always is. Do you happen to know "if the theory is true, then why has no one suggested or attempted to deactivate the 2B gene in the ape creature. Maybe you or someone here can answer and provide a link with the available data including successful experiments. I get not running a trial like this on humans in reverse but, maybe this particular gene selection on ape's?
a car has wheels, turbines are wheels. conveyor belt/system use wheels. they all have serve a different purpose but they all have something in common, a designer. tail bone has a use, appendix has a purpose , not vestigios left overs
They all use the same parts therefore God...... Wow a bike and a motorboat both have metal in it I guess they both are made by the same guy then.... Wait I have metal in my body guess a bike engeneer build me then...
@@bigsmoke4345 about the fact his content is incorrect ? My view on such things has no inherent affect to my emotions . I suggest you consider before commenting next time .
Or possibly this is all evidence that a creator used a similar process in creating all things. Like how many or all of an authors books have a familiar ring to them. Or how one can usually identify the work of an artist by observing familiar traits. I've studied much evolution and creation and in the story of DNA I find it very difficult if not impossible to imagine how so much detailed information contained within each strand could've been arranged through natural mechanical processes.
@@miri8851 You're right it doesn't. All I'm saying is I've given very serious attention to both sides of this debate and the more I learn the harder it is for me to believe someone or something didn't create it. And as being more of a mathematician than anything else I always wind up getting stuck on the probabilities which are insurmountable.
@@michaelheberger3075 there is no "both sides of this debate". Thats the delusion creationists try to create, the "debate" (if there ever was one) has long been settled. But since you seem to be a conspiracy theorist generally i dont doubt you only inform yourself so far that it matches your worldview of it being "illogical". As a "mathematician" you should know that given enough time and chances even the smallest of chances eventually reaches a propablity of ~100%. Seeing that our universe is for all intents and purpuses basically infinite, propability is absolutely no problem. Also you're creating the same problem every creationist creates: "Evoltion needs a designer, its too complex" "Well then who did design the designer, given he is even more complex" "The designer doesnt need a designer, hes an exception" Well then your DNA can be an exception just as well. Also evolution didnt just "pop DNA into existence" like magic, i really doubt you informed yourself. Seeing your View history i am not surprised.
@@NoMementoMori Throwing unfounded accusations seriously dilutes your credibility. It seems your issue here is personal because almost none of your response applies to me. Being skeptical in no way makes a person even remotely conspiratorial. There's a growing number of highly educated non religious scientists who have begun to doubt natural selection. Try mocking them see where that gets ya.
When you know what to look for, you see evidence for evolution everywhere. Where can YOU find it?
Daddy
What's ur field of PhD.....? Specific
My teeth !
Shiv A Joshi biochemistry I believe
Being alive...
Today I learned that me almost dying after noshing some chips due to hiccups is because of my crummy fish ancestor trying to survive.
So how gene come to existence
@@mohdfarhan5255 hmm... I see where this is going..
If only we had evolved from Spongebobs...
I love how one half of this comments is religion vs. evolution and the other is people being bummed evolution took away our tails so we can't be catgirls
I just like science, as long as we look at it for what it is and not what we want it to be.
Food for thought
Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. th-cam.com/video/Dii6Aor7nH4/w-d-xo.html
The Programming of Life th-cam.com/video/00vBqYDBW5s/w-d-xo.html
As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpected-an exquisite ‘language’ composed of some 3 billion genetic letters. “One of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,” says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., “was that DNA actually stores information-the detailed instructions for assembling proteins-in the form of a four-character digital code”
It is hard to fathom, but the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopaedia Britannica-an incredible 384 volumes” worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves!
Yet in their actual size-which is only two millionths of a millimeter thick-a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and “there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written” (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334).
Who or what could miniaturize such information and place this enormous number of ‘letters’ in their proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual? Could evolution have gradually come up with a system like this?
This type of high-level information has been found to originate only from an intelligent source.
Let’s first consider some of the characteristics of this genetic ‘language.’ For it to be rightly called a language, it must contain the following elements: an alphabet or coding system, correct spelling, grammar (a proper arrangement of the words), meaning (semantics) and an intended purpose.
Scientists have found the genetic code has all of these key elements. “The coding regions of DNA,” explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, “have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language”
The only types of communication considered high-level are human languages, artificial languages such as computer and Morse codes and the genetic code. No other communication system has been found to contain the basic characteristics of a language.
Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that “DNA is like a software program, only much more complex than anything we’ve ever devised.”
For instance, a book such as Homer’s Iliad contains information, but is the physical book itself information? No, the materials of the book-the paper, ink and glue contain the contents, but they are only a means of transporting it.
If the information in the book was spoken aloud, written in chalk or electronically reproduced in a computer, the information does not suffer qualitatively from the means of transporting it. “In fact the content of the message,” says professor Phillip Johnson, “is independent of the physical makeup of the medium” (Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, 1997, p. 71).
The same principle is found in the genetic code. The DNA molecule carries the genetic language, but the language itself is independent of its carrier. The same genetic information can be written in a book, stored in a compact disk or sent over the Internet, and yet the quality or content of the message has not changed by changing the means of conveying it.
As George Williams puts it: “The gene is a package of information, not an object. The pattern of base pairs in a DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA molecule is the medium, it’s not the message” (quoted by Johnson, p. 70).
So to believe that the genetic code gradually evolved in Darwinian style would break all the known rules of how matter, energy and the laws of nature work. In fact, there has not been found in nature any example of one information system inside the cell gradually evolving into another functional information program.
Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explains that genetic information is primarily an instruction manual and gives some examples.
He writes: “Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, “Take a ¼-inch nut,” a mutation might say, “Take a ⅜-inch nut.” Or instead of “Place the round peg in the round hole,” we might get “Place the round peg in the square hole” … What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in one step-say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio” (Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41).
@@candidob8683
Please copy and paste this reply to mine! I thought i was alone in this pursuit!!! Brilliant work!
We wouldn't be catgirls anyway, we'd be monkeygirls.
Humans never had tails, this is just a tale. When has anyone discovered fossils that show it? This ridiculous notion is like assuming another vehicle that has 4 wheels must have come from the same company factory that the one you have did.
@@dannykurretto4152 Humans didn't have tails. Our ancestors did.
If you STILL cannot grasp the fact of evolution, its okay.
Your inability to understand evolution is not an argument against it.
i n t e l l e c t u a l l y t r a n s c e n d e n t
+The Duck Knight
How those things came about and where those things came from are completely irrelevant to the fact that evolution happened.
Well, that's a pretty bold claim. I expect a thorough explanation and maybe some evidence if applicable.
+The Duck Knight That's thanks to the evolution of intelligence, or specifically evolution of control mechanisms in the form of central nervous system.
Hyper Nova evolution is not a fact it’s a theory. Learn the difference. Interpretations of data and evolutionary explanations are not facts. Direct observable evidence of an organism evolving to another is evidence. And anyone cans grasp these evolutionary explanations, but that doesn’t mean they are true. You made a fallacy “if you don’t accept evolution, then it’s okay, but your inability to understand isn’t an argument against.” Which assumes “if you don’t accept evolution, then you don’t understand it, but if you understand it, then. You must accept it.” Lol which is laughable...
Unfortunately the people who need to see this most probably never will.
I find that EVERYWHERE in life.
Which probably is why those people need those messages in the first place.
@@billskinner7670 No need to hear this.
@Harry Gerry Evolution is a theory not a fact
@Angellical7 yh bro society keepd getting worse bro.
@@icegunz5872 You should look up the definition of a scientific theory and then get back to us.
Gravity is a theory. Cell theory is a theory. Is gravity and our cells fake too?
I would loved an extra eyelid, I hate when shampoo gets in my eyes.
Did you actually watch the video?
@@thegreatbehoover788 here's a tip: use commas, it's faster and easier to use than ellipsis
@@thegreatbehoover788 also relax a little
@@patobanana4909
Here's a tip..Why don't YOU RELAX a little instead of being the grammar police! I am writing for effect, not perfection of grammar. I have always placed five to eight grades ahead on all my grammar and spelling in school. I went to the regionals in spelling bees and read all my encyclopedias before entering high school. I don't need your "help". Using these tiny keyboards on mobile devices lacking functionality causes me to be creative. Arrogant atheists and materialists always love to talk on any subject other than SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE...that is what drives them nuts! They complain, curse, strawman, lie, etc. in order to hide their deficient studies on the subject matter. I'd be rich if I had a dollar for every time the silly people avoided the EVIDENCE.
You've said NOTHING to add to the discussion. Try this...either agree with my statement instead of using DISTRACTION TECHNIQUES of correcting me...OR...use SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE to disprove it. It's that simple .
Oh that's right...you CAN'T. You see, I only write about that which I KNOW. I don't merely PRETEND like the silly materialists and atheists to understand the subject matter. You should try it! I also don't sugarcoat the EVIDENCE that makes silly atheists uncomfortable as so many apologists attempt to do. FACTS matter in SCIENCE and PHILOSOPHY, not whether someone gets butt-hurt over those facts.
@@thegreatbehoover788 we actually have evidence? and you don't?
I am sorry, but evolution is a myth because I will adamantly ignore basic logic and reason to recognize evolution. Also, I will cherry pick information to support my argument and, when encountered with other information that threatens or up ends my claims, I will ignore it and not consider it. I will use every fallacious argument possible to say you are wrong and I am right.
Which basic rule of logic does it ignore?
lol people that don't get the joke
Found the guy who has never taken any biology, chemistry, or physics class class and try to use linguistic impact, like saying magic and sprouting, to make a point to undermined logical evidence. Scientist have found basics proteins in meteorites, and even Mars, that reside in you at this every moment. Scientist have determined that life was not sudden, I dont know why you make the use of monkeys sprouting a bad thing since thats what happened in the bible, and it look nearly a billion years from a single living cell to become a simple organism like fish, and half a billion years to get there to here. To put in into perspective how long these processes happened, by the time you are 32, you are a billion seconds old. Taking biology and chemistry courses co-currently, you can understand why and how this happens.
CaseNumber00 This so called "logical evidence" undermines itself. The universe is far to young and small to produce life naturally. Abiogenisis is impossible. Just give it a million years and I guess dogs will turn into dragons. Just "give it enough time".
DSJ_ oakinW the universe is 13.7 billion years old, and earth is (I think) 5 billion years old
Have a joke : Gnomes don't have chromosomes, they have gnomosomes
This is a solid joke
Gnomes don't have genomes. They have gnomes. Get it?
Gnome microbiologists mostly graduate from GNU; Gnome Nano University.
Bean Sprugget clever
Drew Fisher G-Gnomes
Creationist:
"lalalalala I cant hear a thing"
@Hamster All they do is mindlessly recite creationist websites without ever having thought through them and done any proper research while putting aside their huge biases.
Do you guys really want to argue with a “religious fanatic”? Because if you guys think I’m one of those people you are wrong. Let’s talk.
I was an avid evolutionist my entire life until I went to see a wooly mammoth exhibition.
That was when I realised just how poorly our science story represents reality.
Unfortunately neither evolution nor creation seems to provide an adequate answer for what I'm seeing.
@@adifferentangle7064 learn about practical design, coding, entropy, finance, logistic and management. then search about intelligent design. You will see how human designed is from ground up to create civilization.
Tailbone to sitting for a long time, which needed to create tools, which is one of the pillar of civilization
Mouth connected to lung so human can speak, which is another pillar of civilization
Special foot to support ability to throw thing, which compensate for humanity weakness caused by 70% energy focused on brain, another pillar of civilization
And plenty other
@@HonISfirE So this is called evolution and adaptation to conditions.
And US vice-president still doesn't want to "believe" in this...
He still believes in fairy tales
AX System this is so sad, can we hit 500 dabs?
and you're a typical European
Well in a democracy the population of every country gets what they deserve / vote for. So depending on what you vote for, you might end up with a hard cord creationist as vice-president or one that can't even spell potato (Dan Quayle). But it can get far worse: Italy got Berlusconi (not once, but four times) and in the last election even elected a comedian (by job, not by behavior), Germans thought that Hitler would be a nice guy and elected him, Venezuelans elected Chavez and Maduro to increase their average standard of living, Turkey went several times for Erdogan (who banned evolution from the school curriculum as being far too difficult to be understood by Turkish pupoils) and in the first free democratic election for ages, the Egyptian population decided to elect fundamentalist religious nut Morsi who of course quickly shut down democracy. So it can get worse.
Frank Schneider we are a republic take civics
“A kind of magic that still amazes you even when you know exactly how the magic is done.”
I so dig that. Goosebumps.
0:26 Furries be crying over their lost tails
Tbh I'm glad humans don't still have tails. They wouldn't be big and fluffy like a fox's, they'd be thin and hairless like a rat's. Yuck.
@@AetherealGirl ughhhh! Now I'm thankful we lost our tails🤢🤮
Furries get a LOT of tail!
@@AetherealGirl true 🤢
@@P_Pro27 k buddy
Fun fact: denying evolution is as stupid as being a flat-earther
Got my 23 and me results, turns out I’m %98.7 chimpanzee. 😂
you look like that too (no offense)
?
I did mine too, you and I differ only by 1/1000 base pairs. So a big hug for you my cousin.
But most of that 98.7% resemblence are introns. Thus, we safely said that our miniscle parts, exons, of that 98.7% resemblence are significantly different from chimpanzee. ✌️
The Chevy and Ford pickup trucks look almost the same too but they didn’t evolve they’re made.
Evolution gives me a greater respect for the universe
Same. To know that I am cousins with all living things really shapes my morality to be a lot more compassionate.
@@miri8851 yeah youre related to all humans but not to all living things... check the difference
@@mateuszstan1260
what's your evidence?
@@miri8851 your mom
But dont give you respect for yourself. Who create DNA for every living in our world, plants, animals and humans ?
If it's REALLY ok to be smart, then WHY do I keep getting escorted out of Sunday School question time?
William, that sadly shows a failure of them to do their own research to back up their point of view. What they should say if they don't know the answer to your questions is that they don't know, but that they will be willing to research it and come back with an answer. Shutting down the debate by banning you from the room is no the answer and never will be.
Well that depends on what questions you're asking and how you're asking them
@@creationismistruth551 out of the nearly 8 billion people on this planet and the millions that have gone before NOT ONE PERSON knows what existed or occurred prior to the big bang or the Planck Epoch to be more specific so how do you know?
@@TheTruthKiwi simple logic. We all know the universe is not eternal and had a beginning correct? Scientists referr to this beginning as the moment of creation otherwise known as the big bang according to scientists the big bang is a massive expansion of matter well what caused this expansion? We have never seen information come from nothing so why is it that scientist assume this must have been the case for the universe? The only logicsl conclusion would be that their is a god.
@@creationismistruth551 nope. Scientists do not call it the moment of "creation", they call it the natural origin of our local universe. They don't know what existed or occurred immediately prior to the planck epoch. Nobody does. They don't know that there was "nothing" prior. For all we know the cosmos could have existed in some natural form (most likely a quantum state) for eternity. That is much more logical, probable and likely than an omnipotent entity from another dimension magically creating everything from nothing.
You are making an argument from ignorance and incredulity. You don't know how or why the universe originated therefore gods. That is simply a fallacy.
No creationist in 160 years has ever refuted the Theory of Evolution. It is the foundation of all biological study.
have you seen a TH-cam comment section? they refute it often.
@@alexwilson1140 No they don't. It is all people that use God of the gaps, misinformation, blank claims they hope are true, and/or have no concept of the scientific method.
Like when a creationist says evolution is not observable or it is just a theory they show they don't understand certain scientific terminology. Observable and theory have very different scientific definitions than the common usage of the words.
Many creationists would say the fussion of our two chromosomes is not evidence for evolution however they do not fully understand the scientific method. The reason it is evidence is because it shows a biological nested hierarchy.
All hypotheses and theories must make predictions in which the hypothesis or theory can be falsified (disproven). Predictions are experiments and what all tests and evidence stems from. The theory of evolution predicts all biological systems will be arranged in a nested hierarchy.
Science works by gathering much evidence through constant experiments. No single theory or hypothesis is based off of a single piece of evidence. So alone our fused chromosomes do not seem to mean much but it is about the constant accurate predictions the theory of evolution makes.
@@alexwilson1140 No. Lies do not refute science.
@@alexwilson1140 They CRY about it constantly, but they never refute it.
I wonder, what evolutionary path caused everything to taste like chicken?
modern chickens are fed so much crap that they taste super generic, so more seems to taste like chicken.
Nothing tastes like chicken but most meat tastes like meat, chicken included.
Gravijta or....is it that we evolved to think everything tastes like chicken?
Gravijta, you taste meat. Chicken tastes like meat, not the other way around.
Its the matrix!
And creationists still believe in creation, despite overwhelming proof.
Why, because they wilfully ignore the evidence, or worse don't understand it.
"And creationists still believe in creation"
- how stupidly circular
Don’t see why you can’t believe in a creator and accept evolution but okay.
@@mattchambers4561 I agree with you. I was making a general point
@@Dr.IanPlect Uh, that is not circular.
I understand the theory of evolution but, personally, find the existence of God and intelligent creation far more logical and probable than everything coming together by chance. It's my opinion and justification, doesn't make yours any less valued.
After reading comments for more than haft an hours I came to the conclusion that people those are arguing against evolution know nothing about biology. They just watch some youtube video or read an article to support their beliefs
& I came to the conclusion that Darwinians know nothing about biology. Especially, causality of genetic information in the first place!
@@Sheen023 After visiting your channel it is apparent to me that you are one of those people that only watch youtube video and become expert in the field.
The only people who deny science, including the Theory of Evolution, are those whose religious beliefs are debunked by science. There are no atheist creationists, nor essentially no educated in Biology creationists.
Confirmation bias at its finest.
@@ameerhamza4816 Mr intelligent man calm down
When he says stay curious I literally feel like a biologist
Evolution is the most beautiful story about life on Earth, an unbroken thread of living organisms that managed to pass over their genes.
And here we are now, able to understand it, as Carl Sagan said: "We are a way for the cosmos to know itself".
Sagan must have picked that from Hegel, though! Very beautiful comment, Gordon +++ :).
While evolution is obviously quite real, it did not create life. The Absolute created life and also created evolution to manage life.
@@mysticwine Proof?
But absurdly enough those genetic information came about to existence "accidentally" according to the story.
Food for thought
Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. th-cam.com/video/Dii6Aor7nH4/w-d-xo.html
The Programming of Life th-cam.com/video/00vBqYDBW5s/w-d-xo.html
As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpected-an exquisite ‘language’ composed of some 3 billion genetic letters. “One of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,” says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., “was that DNA actually stores information-the detailed instructions for assembling proteins-in the form of a four-character digital code”
It is hard to fathom, but the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopaedia Britannica-an incredible 384 volumes” worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves!
Yet in their actual size-which is only two millionths of a millimeter thick-a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and “there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written” (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334).
Who or what could miniaturize such information and place this enormous number of ‘letters’ in their proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual? Could evolution have gradually come up with a system like this?
This type of high-level information has been found to originate only from an intelligent source.
Let’s first consider some of the characteristics of this genetic ‘language.’ For it to be rightly called a language, it must contain the following elements: an alphabet or coding system, correct spelling, grammar (a proper arrangement of the words), meaning (semantics) and an intended purpose.
Scientists have found the genetic code has all of these key elements. “The coding regions of DNA,” explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, “have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language”
The only types of communication considered high-level are human languages, artificial languages such as computer and Morse codes and the genetic code. No other communication system has been found to contain the basic characteristics of a language.
Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that “DNA is like a software program, only much more complex than anything we’ve ever devised.”
For instance, a book such as Homer’s Iliad contains information, but is the physical book itself information? No, the materials of the book-the paper, ink and glue contain the contents, but they are only a means of transporting it.
If the information in the book was spoken aloud, written in chalk or electronically reproduced in a computer, the information does not suffer qualitatively from the means of transporting it. “In fact the content of the message,” says professor Phillip Johnson, “is independent of the physical makeup of the medium” (Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, 1997, p. 71).
The same principle is found in the genetic code. The DNA molecule carries the genetic language, but the language itself is independent of its carrier. The same genetic information can be written in a book, stored in a compact disk or sent over the Internet, and yet the quality or content of the message has not changed by changing the means of conveying it.
As George Williams puts it: “The gene is a package of information, not an object. The pattern of base pairs in a DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA molecule is the medium, it’s not the message” (quoted by Johnson, p. 70).
So to believe that the genetic code gradually evolved in Darwinian style would break all the known rules of how matter, energy and the laws of nature work. In fact, there has not been found in nature any example of one information system inside the cell gradually evolving into another functional information program.
Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explains that genetic information is primarily an instruction manual and gives some examples.
He writes: “Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, “Take a ¼-inch nut,” a mutation might say, “Take a ⅜-inch nut.” Or instead of “Place the round peg in the round hole,” we might get “Place the round peg in the square hole” … What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in one step-say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio” (Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41).
So you're saying any one of us can be a pillar man without us knowing?
Justin Y. Oh its you
Everywhere!!
I have subscribed to you know. I see you on every video every day, so I figured why not.
GO AWAY
Afternoon Justin.
*Tips hat
How pathetic that we live during a time that when speaking of the science of Evolution we have to debase the conversation by talking about magic, ie, religious creation beliefs. I think it’s best to leave that to the magic believers and focus instead on reality, because no matter the evidence presented, a person who believes in creationism is never going to be persuaded.
Except that reality does not care about us, so why should we talk about it?
The real world doesn't care what happens to us. We exist for no reason at all and when we die we are gone forever. So why should I care about the real world if it doesn't care about me?
@@mikeykitty1235 Because the world isn't a mean guy that doesn't care about you, but rather a fascinating place, with so many awesome things to explore. Some things on this world are just unbelievable beautiful.
HAHAHAHA! As the FANTASIES keep rolling on for silly evolutionists! They forget that their magical natural selection fairy isn't actually real! HAHAHAHA!!!
If you have EVIDENCE show us the EVIDENCE where Chromosomes MAGICALLY ATTACH without deformation! HAHAHAHA!!! Go ahead show us the PROOF...what's that....crickets....OH I see your FANTASIES are okay with NO OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE. ...but someone else can't do the very same thing with a PROVEN DESIGN showing in DNA???? HYPOCRITES!!! BLIND IGNORANT FAITH has led you to your conclusions...that and you hate anything about life that is OBSERVATIONALLY AND OBVIOUSLY DESIGNED...RIGHT???
@@JohnCena8351
There is no such thing as beauty in a Godless universe silly! Your little electrochemical reactions are just making you feel a certain way is just an accident...there is meaninglessness and purposeless existence for you silly atheistic materialists!
@@thegreatbehoover788 Haha, okay, what ever. Go pray to your stupid god. You can't take reality anyway.
It doesn’t matter how much evidence science has. Creationists will just claim it’s all part of God’s design. Creationists now claim DNA proves Gods design.
Yes and that's a good thing.
@@ironwox regress
@@ironwoxnot at all
While evolution is at it, why not give me a tail?
*i really want one*
The Science Biome what use will it have?
wiping your butt when you run out of TP in a public restroom.
germans have a tail lol (its a wordplay in german language)
The Science Biome you'll never live to see it happen...
buy a tail buttplug
So I've got a few questions now, as biology fascinates me but sadly I don't know much of it
1. From what I understood, then our DNA is stored inside our chromosomes?
2. Are chromosomes inside every cell in our bodies?
3. What is exactly the 'genome'?
I think I'm getting it wrong and really would like to get the bigger picture, so if anyone could enlighten me It'd be greatly appreciated
Also great video, as always
1. Yes. Basically, DNA is coiled around charged proteins called histones, which then further coil to form a very compact version of DNA called chromosomes. This is usually seen only during cell division.
2. Yes, DNA is, but not always in the form of chromosomes.
3. Genome is the entire sequence of base pairs that makes up an organism's DNA. :)
Agustín Auditore 1.Chromosomes store DNA 2.Chromosomes are inside every cell of our body. 3. A genome is the genetic material of a living organism.
Thanks a lot for the replies! I now understand a bit more
Thanks guys!
Have a great day!
ya the other people got it, but just something to add about question 2. You have the exact same DNA stored in every cell, be it a nerve cell or an intestinal cell. However, which genes are expressed (thus what proteins are made) varies from cell type to cell type
Honestly, human DNA needs more clearing up from old updates than my pc does😂
Do not go bellow this comment, a a lot of people down there are trying to disprove evolutionary theory when they can't even define "theory"
Some facts and much assumptions =theory.
@@simplicityistheultimatesop6571 congrats bud you don't know what a theory is.
@@kvazac4432 understanding what happened hundreds of million years ago is not possible to the degree to form a theory.if 2 or more scientists reach the same conclusions,does it make it a theory?
@@simplicityistheultimatesop6571 I suggest you actually find out what a theory is.
Facts
I love going through the comments section and seeing all the people trying to use arguments against evolution that were refuted 100 years ago and people like Ray Comfort still profit from.
Keith Durant same
Keith Durant same
If you ike that, you should read the book, Refuting Evolution. We had to analyze it in class and present the misconceptions about evolution. It was a very tiring and most especialy annoying work because there are a lot of misconception in there. Great read, if you want to tear your eyes out about how little (even educated) people know about evolution
@@danicaaustria4146 Let me guess three of them. There are no transitional fossils. Evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics (or as Creationists tend to call, the Law of Entropy). If we evolved from monkeys, then why are there still monkeys?
Pretty sure we were created by the flying spaghetti monster
Blessed be its name!
The universe is the pasta, the cosmos the sauce, and we are its meatballs.
May his noodly apendages bless all of you, Ramen
No you mean Go.D Usopp
Where is Justin Y...???
Edit: Yes ,he is....
Scroll up, boi
Such videos Really deserve the category title "EDUCATION:"
Knowing, learning how stuff really works gives me shivers of happiness.
From step 1 to step 2 we need billion of years "evolution" .... I have the desire to know why you said "How stuff really warks" when you can't know anything????
I’m still waiting for them to explain biogenesis
@@theyaduvanshiindian391 how does one go about conducting research on biogenesis? Everyone is so fixated on evolution yet it seems no scientist wants to dip their fingers into the untapped wealth of recognition that could come from making discoveries in abiogenesis. You can ignore the origin of life and only focus on the origin of species but the theory is incomplete without knowing how inorganic chemicals evolved into organic life forms. Why not also consider the origin of the first life forms?
@@Migger_29 No doubt. How could life "pop" into existence? And if it could how could that life sustain itself for more than a millisecond...or survive long enough to evolve necessary components for reproduction? All fascinating stuff!!
THINK AGAIN.... WONDER WHY ATHEIST ENDS CRAZY...... 👁👁
In the first minute I learned more than a whole biology class!
The Sarcastic Potato then you should start paying attention
The Sarcastic Potato Wow you must go to a shitty school or you are young.
Well did you only go to class for 10 minutes of 1 day or what lol
It's like you guys didn't read his name 😂 it wasn't over dramatic statement bashing the school system
Lol, I hear in a lot of red states they put off teaching evolution.
Some of the best content on TH-cam. Thanks PBS
PBS is a parasite
Post a video when you can explain #1 how everything came from nothing, and #2 how evolution could achieve and be based on the opposite of the natural law of nature that all decays, and #3 when you design a working human brain that can heal itself. It takes a billion times as much faith to believe the evolution religion of everything from nothing without God.
You can probably never understand unless you study and believe God's Word. #1 all time most read book.
@@TruthChristians wow 😑 really?
@@TruthChristians
Hello. I'm no expert but
1) The phrasing is wrong. Nothing is commonly referred to as the lack of anything. This is not the correct definition for 'nothing' in your sentence.
2) Not everything 'decays'. Sand is formed from erosion of rocks but it is still seen as 'decaying'. But stars are from from many elements in space and the are not seen as decaying, rather as being born. So the answer to this argument is all based on wording.
3) This is a strawman. Evolution is not the assertion that a human can create or build another human, it is just the result of multiple tests, experiments and observations over time.
As for Evolution being called a religion, it does not fit under it's definition. Nobody expects you to take it as the only truth, but you are taught about it because it has been proven as true. Just like history because it has been recorded and proven that it actually happened (even if not 100% accurately), like math because you can calculate it and use in the real world, and writing, because almost everybodyon Earth uses some form of writing.
I hope this helps clear some of the misconceptions about evolution 👍
Myths of creation around the world. That's my new favorite sentence.
It's true. There are many false creation myths around the world. But what takes greater faith-to believe that the millions of intricately coordinated parts of a cell arose by random chance or to believe that the cell is the product of an intelligent mind.
@@pacnja1332 you worded it wrong but the first not the intelligent mind
@@Mark-Wilson how would you word it right?
@@ZealousWins idk man i wrote it about 2 weeks ago I don't remember
@@Mark-Wilsonit's fine, i'm trying my best to learn more about evolution
Here come all the creationists giving "proof" that evolution is a lie, while not answering this video
Edit: would you all stop replying to this
God created evolution. It's real. So is life. God created life. Evolution modifies and keeps life under control.
@@mysticwine ...and yet, no EVIDENCE is given, most often, because of a lack of what even CONSTITUTES EVIDENCE.
@@brianmi40 The evidence is here. You refuse to accept it for some reason.
@@mysticwine - and YET, strangely, no EVIDENCE is given by you.
In fact, not only can you NOT demonstrate that a god exists, you clowns can't even demonstrate that ANYTHING PARANORMAL EXISTS. It's EXACTLY why not a penny of this money has ever been given away:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prizes_for_evidence_of_the_paranormal
IF your god did create us, AND ON TOP OF IT, drive evolution to THIS CONCLUSION TODAY, he is even MORE OR A MORAL THUG THAN THE BIBLE SHOWS HIM TO BE.
Just the simple fact that 5,000 PEOPLE DIE FROM CHOKING EACH YEAR BECAUSE OF "YOUR GOD'S AWESOME DESIGN FOR OUR BODY", PROVES THAT HE IS EITHER A COMPLETE *MORON* - OR *YOU* *ARE* FOR BELIEVING HE EXISTS.
Occam's razor would then establish that YOU are the MORON.
Poor silly fool! DNA is the MOST SOPHISTICATED and COMPLEX and VOLUMINOUS CODE ever assembled. Prove that FACT wrong! Prove that a DESIGNER is not needed to create and assemble hardware and software with thousands upon thousands of DEPENDENCIES on separate MIRACULOUS mechanisms needed... we are all waiting! Just SHOW THE EVIDENCE for your silly BELIEFS and we will all be convinced! HAHAHAHA! Silly atheists don't even know you've been played! No the CHROMOSOMES could not have MIRACULOUSLY JOINED! Go find out why this fool is LYING. OR, just BELIEVE him by BLIND FAITH as you already exhibited for us! HAHAHAHA!
Thank you for making this video 👍🏻
NerdSync didn’t expect to find you here.
Hey, i enjoyed your videos. Thank you.
NerdSync NERDSYNC I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS!!!
So you like being lied to?
@@oriolvp4413
Look silly boy...your God Hatred has absolutely nothing to do with this silly evolutionary lie!
ALL you have to do is EXACTLY what I challenged the maker of this video to do...provide ACTUAL EVIDENCE that a telomere translocation like this has EVER BEEN OBSERVED to change species or POSITIVELY increase information in an organism!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yes....I LAUGH at your brainless FAITH!!! If it was about UNASSUMED SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that we have EVER OBSERVED...you could provide the PROOF. The reason you CAN'T provide EVIDENCE is because that FANTASY he spoke of...well it has NEVER OCCURRED in the history of OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCE...yet by BLIND IGNORANT FAITH...you BELIEVE anyways???? DESPITE the EVIDENCE!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What a moronic way to address EVIDENCE!!! Oh...and did I mention that SCIENTISTS ALREADY KNOW AND WE HAVE OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE that our genomes ARE NOT even close to 98%...or 95%...or 90% similar to a chimpanzee???? Did you know that:
"About 30 percent of all human proteins are identical in sequence to the corresponding chimp protein."...according to the chimpanzee genome project on wikipedia. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
And notice how CONVENIENTLY leave out the part where MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF CODE WERE....
IGNORED!!!
Did you catch that silly boy? IGNORED because....because....because.... even the brightest scientists have emotional needs and BIASES. You share an emotional neediness for a Godless universe. That's why you're here...to BOLSTER your FAITH...in a FANTASY!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
By all means...please tell us all...what the PERCENTAGE alike our genomes are similar to a Chimpanzee when we DON'T IGNORE ANY OF THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE?????????????
You've been PLAYED!!! You have been a SUCKER...a BIASED CYNIC...not a "skeptic" as you parade your silly FAITH AROUND as "SCIENCE"!!!! It isn't. It is being WILLFULLY IGNORANT!!!! CONGRATULATIONS on your OBVIOUS emotional hatred of God driving you to parrot such ridiculous drivel!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Now watch folks as he CAN'T PROVIDE EVIDENCE of GENOMIC similarity without "FORGETTING"...OOPS...or ACTUALLY IGNORING the ACTUAL EVIDENCE of the DNA CODE!!! HAHAHAHA!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The maker of this video praised all his parrots....yet IGNORED my challenge of RRADILY AVAILABLE INFORMATION because he KNOWS this FANTASY never ACTUALLY happened!!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You people are such idiots to accept by FAITH alone....without an ounce of skepticism!!!!! It proves how BIASED you are!!! Silly boy! Lol.
In live near the countryside and spend my time in a wood. I always feel more related to animals than humans. I can stay all day until night int the wood, finding water, running and resting under a tree, I can find the north, I can say what hour it is by looking at the sky. I observe how nature changes with seasons and animals' behaviour. Trying to integrate. And I feel something sacred in it. A big conection to everything. And wild animals seem to have accepted my presence there. They are even curious when I am training. Not the same in cities with humans and theirs problems. They seem detached from reality and have a huge bunch of problems due to worl, social issues, predominance, power, politics... I always felt more like an animal, I know it sounds weird. So happy that my genes tell a different story humans are used to. We are part of everything
Loved this video
sweeeet
All these creationists be saying evolution is a lie but show no evidence
Banm Alralmen “if iťs true why they call it theory”
a coherent group of propositions formulated to explain a group of facts or phenomena in the natural world and repeatedly confirmed through experiment or observation: the scientific theory of evolution. - Google
Banm Alralmen “just because they’re similar doesn’t mean they’re related”
It does.
Banm Alralmen “these chromosomes don’t look alike”
Yes they do.
That’s as if you told me that 2 + 2 = 5. There’s just nothing to explain why you’re wrong..
Evolution is easy to disprove. Also on a side note, maybe you are an evolutionist or a proponent of the idea. I was looking for some info on it. I could spend all day researching it but, it would be much easier to ask someone knowledgeable like it always is. Do you happen to know "if the theory is true, then why has no one suggested or attempted to deactivate the 2B gene in the ape creature. Maybe you or someone here can answer and provide a link with the available data including successful experiments. I get not running a trial like this on humans in reverse but, maybe this particular gene selection on ape's?
@@END-oc4quso disprove it
Somewhere on internet, Evangelicals are screaming "Evolution is just a THEORY!"
Just as gravity, so I hope they jump out of a cliff
Thanks for explicitly naming Evangelicals as orthodox and catholic Christians believe in evolution and not in creationism
The book "Finding Darwin's God" is an interesting explanation of evolution. Written by the cell biologist Ken Miller. (A devout Catholic.) He wrote a follow-up called "Only A Theory" but I haven't read that.
Watch kent hovinds channel.
They all spew that.
It is a theory and God is real.
You and I might believe this but it will never convince a creationist... they’ll just say everything in this video is “by design”
Creation and evolution co exist simultaneously.
I'm not a creationist, but all this video does is point out the very obvious and undeniable genetics we share, then applies an unbacked hypothesis that this must mean we have a common ancestor. This is done frequently and is a type of God-of-the-gaps argument. You take a bunch of well-known, indisputable data, then apply a baseless or at least extremely weak theory to fill in the gaps. The evidence for evolution is overwhelming, the evidence for a common ancestor for chimps and humans is pathetic.
@@QuinnBook Where did evolution come from?
@@mysticwine the process itself? No idea, waiting for science to show me. Why do you ask?
@@QuinnBook I say evolution is a product of creation. Creation first, then evolution.
All hail the Flying Spaghetti Monster CAN I GET A RAMEN?
Mr Kerman Ramen
RaMeN
Mr Kerman RAMEN
RAMEN
Ramen
On the contrary, our complex DNA proves evolution is nothing but a fairytale. You see, for one type of animal to morph into another requires the infusion of new information. The addition of a tail, a wing, a leg - all these need new information just like a computer program needs new codes to perform new tasks. Mutation rearranges or losses information but it never adds new ones so how does an organism evolve into a different kind with mutation? The creation of new information requires a mind and careful planning just like creating a new program to run on a computer. You don't get a car, a ship or an airplane out of random mutation. You get them from an intelligent designer.
New information gets added to the genome in all sorts of ways.
There are many examples of mutations adding information. This has been a long held lie by creationists. For example can you explain how gene duplication cannot add information? We have seen genes duplicate then over time those new duplicated genes will undergo mutations f there own separate from the genes they came from thereby creating new protiens and features. So how is gene duplication (a mutation) not adding information?
@Tony Tony Wow what an intelligent rebuttal. Sorry but just because you are a simpleton that does not understand genetics it doesn't mean what I said is wrong.
Irreducible complexity is bullshit and you know it.
@Martin Aquiles Penaco, it's so funny, when you losers can't defend your opinion, you just run away like a little scared cat;)
Woah!! this blew my mind... to think that we have come so far and we can exactly see and measure our DNA
I never thought of my mom as a yolk sack before. Thanks
So hiccups are just a leftover *hiccup* from our evolution?
I’m sorry
😢
Good one
The way you depicted the 48 to 46 chromosomes as evidence of evolution made the concept more concrete for me. If i ever encounter someone refuting evolution, I feel that I will now be able to clearly articulate why evolution accurately explains our reality. I’ll also save this video as a great reference as well 😉! Thank you and keep it up.
Thank you friend
But your expertise is already needed
For their is someone arguing against evolution in these comments right now
*If you sort by newest the most recent comment should be one against evolution* **At time of comment**
Their name is Marifor Tese
Or something along the lines of that
What unbelievable is people like Lee spinter , mit physicist, dont believe in evolution, how can he be that ignorant
🤓☺️……脊椎動物の標本を見ると、進化論が、疑う余地が無い位に正しい事が分かります。🤗……聖書を初めとした宗教は、現実をコピーして精神論的に転写して確立した新しい別の世界観ですから、進化論と同じ次元で語る事は出来ません。😊……私は、進化論賛成者で有り、聖書の世界を信仰している人間です🤗……この２つは、人間が活きる為に必要な進化活性化させる事が出来る、いわば、ミトコンドリア的な力です。☺️……私は、マトリックスを【聖母マリア様】に置き換えて活きています🤗
Why argue with them,, Just tell them there is no God there is No hell,, where you will burn for all internet. And not to worry about it, live their life as a perverted fool if they choose to.
I am fascinated by Evolution. And I don't need a lego-builder-God to believe in God. I think God is presence but he doesn't interfere. But this, particularly Evolution and natural history, sharpens the question why God allows all this suffering.
Well...the big turning point.
For me God can't interfere, but he is there - ESPECIALLY in the suffering and that's why he hangs at the cross, suffering like us, instead of fighting back.
❤
Why Africa. Why did nature select
the African Continent to evolve humanity?
It’s a dry, seemingly barren place.
Maybe there’s more there than meets the eye..
There is splendour, magic and awe in the natural world and to dumb it down with a man-made deity - just to make sure it's all about us - is sad.
Daaaamn!
Savage!
Well said, dude.
The bible fanbase about to get mad
only certain subgroups to the fandom
Shimmy Post lol fact. My parent used to fall under that group. I changed her mind tho. (:
Whole Monotheism fanbase is about to get mad 😏
naah, i'm one of those fanboys and I ain't mad
Magic Super Universe atheist trolls in full swing I see
Theists picketing and protesting against Evolution in the comments section again 😂😂😂
Creationists go reeeeeeeeee
This is the friendliest comment section on a video about evolution
So since many of us eat chicken does that make us, in some small way, cannibals? 🤔
Shawon 305 sure, in a small way. But who cares, I could go for some right now.
You could make that argument about eating anything, even plants
In some way...
That's why vegans believe that they are ethically above us meat-eaters.
Luis Aldamiz, most vegans have slightly different reasoning from each other. like health, but if that says their better then you for it... they might be right but it's still rude.
also, the majority of vegans don't want to get in conversations about whos better or worse based on their diets. (not that they dont think they have good reasoning for theirs)
Not only cannibals, but incest-ibals - eating a member of your own family.
ERVs are yet another slam dunk on the 'god dun it' hypothesis.
Stated Clearly posted a really good video today on just that topic. It is called "DNA Evidence That Humans & Chimps Share A Common Ancestor: Endogenous Retroviruses"
@@TonyTigerTonyTiger That was a great video. Had no idea of the numbers, it was a great presentation.
- thank you for the interview, Mr Maincreationist.
- np
- do you have a favourite breed of dogs?
- yes, my favourite is th...
- thank you for the interview.
I do not get the punch line
U never wrote the his favorite breed what's the reply
@@samrowe2889 Dig in.
@@samrowe2889 the guy is a creationist and since dog breeds come from evolution he can’t have one
@@XParasiteOctoling What unbelievable is people like Lee spinter , mit physicist, dont believe in evolution, how can he be that ignorant
Now, that's my new favourite video as of today. The last part really touched me. Thanks :)
Most of the comments I see from creationists in this comment section is attacking abiogenesis, not evolution. This shows a deep misunderstanding of the theory of evolution.
Don't confuse evolution with abiogenesis. The theory of evolution only explains that we are all related and come from a common ancestor. The theory does not explain how that first living organism came about.
So anyone who claims that DNA can't make itself therefore evolution can't be true is making a strawman argument.
You're wrong. Abiogenesis is the start. Before that first life Evolved, it needed to form. You like to duck what is known by Evolutionists to be the greatest problem they have. Race cars without crossing the starting line. We could get in to how Richard Lenski's bacteria experiment shows how we would still be bacteria, given that 70,000 generations of e coli are still that, but we don't have to talk about how all we ever observe is things reproducing after themselves. If you don't need to have a start then you don't have a life form, so nothing can Evolve. Tell me this, do you think if abiogenesis was discovered in a lab, chemicals to straight up life via explosion, that it would be put at the beginning of every Evolution chapter? Cause it's the start, and they dang near do this with Urey Miller, which is just amino acids, not even life, just something used by life.
We're all part of the molecular river meandering through time and space! :-D
*space-time
This is the type of video where you have to set comments to "newest first"
Parz1val *_FACT_*
I thoroughly enjoyed the depth of this video! Keep up the great work 👌
Also on a side note, maybe you are an evolutionist or a proponent of the idea. I was looking for some info on it. I could spend all day researching it but, it would be much easier to ask someone knowledgeable like it always is. Do you happen to know "if the theory is true, then why has no one suggested or attempted to deactivate the 2B gene in the ape creature. Maybe you or someone here can answer and provide a link with the available data including successful experiments. I get not running a trial like this on humans in reverse but, maybe this particular gene selection on ape's?
No religious people in the chat complaining? wow that's a first xD
people are unironically arguing about their religions they did not even watched the video
Too bad our vice president Mike Pence didn't study harder in biology class. It's sad that someone so scientifically illiterate is helping run this country.
The Red Celt That too.
Did you say run? I think the word you were looking for was destroy. Easy mistake!
U are a POS and I can show u a video that debunks all this bs
Trump2020
Thomas Sharp alright so link the video lol.
Almost right with the Tír na nÓg.
Ó is pronounced like the o in no or doe. Not like egg nog but reads more ‘noge.’ Like the sound of the o changes in not to note
The Red Celt just informative. Commenting on my comment is way more “pedantic!”
@@MickeyHarp "Since you asked, I find this meatloaf rather shallow and pedantic"
This only proves the need for a precise creator not a theory with many flaws
how so?
@@somemagellanic I wonder too
@@somemagellanic look up regulatory sequences or RNA termination sequences. You think its all an accident almost everything that is living has similar ways of termination.
You want to know something else. A lot of biochemists don’t use the word evolution ever you know why its simple. We have proteins that look the same and behave differently.
Please educate yourself a lot of people don’t actually believe in this stupid theory we are learning things that a 200 year old theory cant explain. The fossil record is actually a terrible argument for evolution its perhaps the most flowed one. We once thought vestigial structures were useless the number for these structures was as high as 150 now we got 1 or 2 and there is still research being done on that.
Linean Taxonomy perhaps is one good illustration of how evolution works. The grouping of organisms prove how organisms share common ancestors. Like for example, sharks/class chondrichthies, dunkleosteus/placodermi and tuna/class ostheichthies shares a common gnathostomata/jawed fish ancestor. Those 3 fish groups were separated from hagfishes and lampreys/class agnatha because they do not have bone and yet, they all share a common ancestor which is a creature with hard backbone/subphylum vertebrata.
And people don't "believe" in evolution
Food for thought
Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. th-cam.com/video/Dii6Aor7nH4/w-d-xo.html
The Programming of Life th-cam.com/video/00vBqYDBW5s/w-d-xo.html
As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpected-an exquisite ‘language’ composed of some 3 billion genetic letters. “One of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,” says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., “was that DNA actually stores information-the detailed instructions for assembling proteins-in the form of a four-character digital code”
It is hard to fathom, but the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopaedia Britannica-an incredible 384 volumes” worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves!
Yet in their actual size-which is only two millionths of a millimeter thick-a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and “there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written” (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334).
Who or what could miniaturize such information and place this enormous number of ‘letters’ in their proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual? Could evolution have gradually come up with a system like this?
This type of high-level information has been found to originate only from an intelligent source.
Let’s first consider some of the characteristics of this genetic ‘language.’ For it to be rightly called a language, it must contain the following elements: an alphabet or coding system, correct spelling, grammar (a proper arrangement of the words), meaning (semantics) and an intended purpose.
Scientists have found the genetic code has all of these key elements. “The coding regions of DNA,” explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, “have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language”
The only types of communication considered high-level are human languages, artificial languages such as computer and Morse codes and the genetic code. No other communication system has been found to contain the basic characteristics of a language.
Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that “DNA is like a software program, only much more complex than anything we’ve ever devised.”
For instance, a book such as Homer’s Iliad contains information, but is the physical book itself information? No, the materials of the book-the paper, ink and glue contain the contents, but they are only a means of transporting it.
If the information in the book was spoken aloud, written in chalk or electronically reproduced in a computer, the information does not suffer qualitatively from the means of transporting it. “In fact the content of the message,” says professor Phillip Johnson, “is independent of the physical makeup of the medium” (Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, 1997, p. 71).
The same principle is found in the genetic code. The DNA molecule carries the genetic language, but the language itself is independent of its carrier. The same genetic information can be written in a book, stored in a compact disk or sent over the Internet, and yet the quality or content of the message has not changed by changing the means of conveying it.
As George Williams puts it: “The gene is a package of information, not an object. The pattern of base pairs in a DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA molecule is the medium, it’s not the message” (quoted by Johnson, p. 70).
So to believe that the genetic code gradually evolved in Darwinian style would break all the known rules of how matter, energy and the laws of nature work. In fact, there has not been found in nature any example of one information system inside the cell gradually evolving into another functional information program.
Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explains that genetic information is primarily an instruction manual and gives some examples.
He writes: “Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, “Take a ¼-inch nut,” a mutation might say, “Take a ⅜-inch nut.” Or instead of “Place the round peg in the round hole,” we might get “Place the round peg in the square hole” … What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in one step-say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio” (Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41).
I don't believe in chimpanzees
So u think life came from non life? Ur a dumbass then if u think we came from inanimate materials.
@@TheHiddenChronicle-b9l you're a dumbass if you think evolution isn't real with all the evidence we have.
@@bilalsadain so you think we came from inanimate / inorganic materials? That violates the law of biogenesis. It is impossible for life to come from non life, even if it spans billions of years.
*Creationists joined the chat.*
*Common sense left the chat.*
Believing in the scientific impossibly that nothing created everything is somehow common sense.
@@PlantChrist If you could at least understand that the theory of evolution is not saying that nothing created everything you maybe wouldnt be so against it.
Its literally just change over time in organisms, that and nothing more. Not the creation of organisms, not the creation of the universe, just this.
Memento Mori even worse, it only explains what life does but doesn’t explain how the splitter came to be. Creationist argument nail them both. What I’m saying is the theory of evolution is sometimes correlated to the Big Bang.
Memento Mori now can you tell me what molecule is truth in or love is it just a chemical reaction?
@@PlantChrist Neither molecule or chemical. "Truth" and "Love" are human fictions. They arise out of the human imagination. They are stories we tell each other which allow us to cooperate and survive. Others include Money (perhaps the biggest - who doesn't believe in it), Justice, Mercy, Human Rights and (of course) God.
Well constructed and clear presentation. Nice job
Food for thought
Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. th-cam.com/video/Dii6Aor7nH4/w-d-xo.html
The Programming of Life th-cam.com/video/00vBqYDBW5s/w-d-xo.html
Candido B. Thank you for sharing.
If only there were ANY EVIDENCE PROVING that this man's silly FANTASY ever happened.... right! HAHAHAHA!!!
By all means show us the EVIDENCE that this CAN HAPPEN TO PRODUCE SUPERIOR CODE!!! OH...that's right...you can't. This was just another farce that you BELIEVED! Loke the tooth fairy...the person who BELIEVES the fantasy will tell you there's EVIDENCE...but like the tooth fairy...you can't produce OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE OF IT EVER HAPPENING....FANTASY!!!
@@thegreatbehoover788 He literally shows proof and you act like it doesn't exist wow
@@yeetri1034
No silly boy! He doesn't show proof... He tells you his fantasy and you buy into it because you're a sucker! HAHAHAHA!!!
By all means... Show us any... And I mean any... Robertsonian translocation event that led to a positive increase in information! HAHAHAHA!!!!
What's that???? Crickets chirping................
Right! NEVER HAPPENED! WHAT AN IGNORANT FOOL to FANTASIZE such an event that has NEVER been OBSERVED in the history of SCIENCE..so FANTASY is PROOF to you???? HAHAHAHA!!! SUCKERS!!!
Good job Joe you brought the evidence to creationists and disproved their myths .
👏👏👏👏👏
(This is not sarcasm I'm actually glad someone had the balls to make this video against creationism)
What evidence? Did they show a video of the missing link pregnant and showing the DNA mutating into a human? Showing the fusion. I am not a creationist
@@all-lives_matter did watch the video?
*What about my extra toe?!?!*
Edit:- I’m joking haha
What about it?
Pandas have an extra finger. You are an endangered specie.
You're a mutant Brucey. Your acceptance letter to the X-Men is in the mail.
Sometimes mistakes are made when chromosomes are being copied during your conception or translated when you were in the womb. For you that just means the genes responsible for your toes called for 6 instead of 5.
That's called "Genetic Mutation". There could be different reasons for it. Just ask your doc.
"humans are special, because of evolution, something we share with every other species."
...then it's not special.... >_>
Special because we can understand evolution unlike other beings, I think.
Well pointed out
Pretty special if you ask me
Evolution is a fact. No stupid religion is gonna change that.
Show me these so called fact
@@HonISfirE evolution is a fact. It has been observed and many transitional fossils have been found.
So nothing to show huh?
@@HonISfirE I am quite curious how an ape suddenly develops a conciousness and intelligence. Or how a rock becomes life.
@@edwardeduardo8561 we were created from water,due to the reducing atmosphere,the chemical evolution,then evolution kept on going on,we have many proof of evolution around us,one example is bacterial resistance to antibiotics due to r-plasmid in their cytoplasm,thisis seen because of use of antibiotics on them for last 100 years
So, that's where the "Mystic Knights of Tir Na Nog" came from 😂
In my unguarded moments, information like this makes me very angry at creationists.
Awesome video! These definitely aren't the standard proofs of evolution that most people hear and it was awesome to learn this new information!
How to get comments
Trigger creationists
Naturalism, the belief a bucket of dirt, sunlight and time can bring about the complete works of Shakespeare.
Now that right there is serious faith.
Evolution is apparently a clumsy creator; everything it makes seems to fail and has to be done over. On the other hand, it does persist and never gives up.
Paul Deal it has no purpose or no will. It really isn't a thing other than a sequence of events that we decided to give a name to.
In a way, you can say it is (though we have to be careful with the word "creator," but I understand you). Yes, this stuff is clumsy, and funnily enough, we have several mechanisms to repair those kinds of errors... as if it knows if fails a lot. Many proteins look around for errors by comparing it with a template and when something is wrong they cut it out and/or replaces it. But that has its fails too... it can even change the template!
Evolution is a consequence of how life works. A consequence of reproduction. A consequence of replication. A consequence of natural selection. Evolution is a type of emergence. There is no way that evolution wouldn't exist in a set like this. Evolution is an inevitability of life -- and other things too.
I seriously wanted to know a genetic and chromosomal view of evolution.I lacked that knowledge.Amazing presentation of amazing facts as always!!!!
that wasnt even facts
he basically said , similar , evolution
@@Guitor972
if god isn’t real how come the sunsets i see every evening are so beautiful?
nazsic I wonder if the child with cancer sees the same sunset and thinks the same way? Their brain may be preoccupied with agony.
I think you're joking right?
Something being beautiful - therefore god. Its a weak argument.
Because your "ancestors" that didnt like the sunset were colorblind, couldn't tell which fruits were ripe, and didnt live to be your ancestors.
Amen
God is real. The God of the Bible isn't. Problem solved.
Ummm. . . I can't think of a single thing about genetics that isn't evidence of evolution.
I find that one can reconcile a Divine Creator and Evolution when one considers that the account of Creation found in the Bible isn't meant to be taken literally. When it is viewed as a poetic description of the balance between man and nature, as well as the relationship man can have with something greater than himself, Evolution, therefore, appears to be a completely logical explanation for the origin and progression of humanity, first set in motion by something beyond the clutches of the second law of Thermodynamics.
Well said
Can't wait for somebody to yeet some bible verses at me.
The Fox
Romans 1
20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world,[g] in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.
22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.
the bible was never wrong, it is how we interpret it for me I personally believe there's deep scientific explanations behind every single words in the bible and should not be taken too literally. the moment you distance science from the bible, you're already lost
@@redeemedchannel5580 So basically, you're saying we can't disprove the existence of god and therefore, he exists, which technically allows you to make litterally any claim AND you're calling me an idiot, which isn't an argument.
@@maps5313 Open that book and read Genesis.
I'd rather open my mind and understanding
Your DNA proves adaptation not evolution.
What do you think the definition of evolution is?
@@helpfulhazz5588 micro adaptations, not macro adaptations. Like you have people with different skin tones ect. But nowhere in your DNA can you prove how the human eye came to be. Evolution is stating we all came from unicellular life forms who got more and more complex. Adaptation is about adjusting to your environment but never does it claim to have creatures grow fins
@@alexandredube141 "micro adaptations, not macro adaptations." Evolution is micro adaptations, not macro adaptations? Could you clarify?
"Like you have people with different skin tones ect. But nowhere in your DNA can you prove how the human eye came to be." While not every piece of life's puzzle has been found, we are steadily filling in the empty spaces as we discover more evidence. The eye most likely began with relatively rudimentary photoreceptors, which can be found even in single-celled organisms. These light-sensitive organelles proved useful for organisms that depended on the Sun for their metabolism. Over time, the photoreceptors became more complex. We actually have found a gene called PAX6 that helps determine how or if eyes are expressed. When it was altered in a mouse embryo, for instance, the mouse did not develop eyes at all.
"Evolution is stating we all came from unicellular life forms who got more and more complex." That's not exactly what evolution itself is, but that is the most likely conclusion based on the evidence.
"Adaptation is about adjusting to your environment but never does it claim to have creatures grow fins" I'll just cut to the chase and tell you the definition of biological evolution: it is the change in allele frequencies in a population of organisms over successive generations.
So adaptation actually is evolution.
Turns out I'm 60% related to bananas!
Evolution is the magic that even when you know how it's done, you're still amazed. That just melted so good...
Evolution is indeed magic. It is a magical fairy tale that didn't happen.
@@tylerb9877 fşptofvihbgvlhvıbk. okay
@@tylerb9877 Imagine trying to say evolution isn't real on a video straight up proving you wrong.
That's quite the cognitive dissonance there.
@Alex Abplanalp Imagine believing you're related to a pine tree.
@@tylerb9877 Do you not understand what eukaryotes are?
Also, ad hominems aren't going to debunk the solid evidence presented in this video. Try again
There's some slick visuals this episode.
The thought of some great creator haviing created all of us is an impressive thought. But the thought of us evolving into what we are today from nothing is, to me, even more impressive.
Food for thought, Also look up "Law of Biogenesis"
Marine Biologist Dr. Rob Carter explains the four-dimensional genome and what the means for design. th-cam.com/video/Dii6Aor7nH4/w-d-xo.html
The Programming of Life th-cam.com/video/00vBqYDBW5s/w-d-xo.html
As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpected-an exquisite ‘language’ composed of some 3 billion genetic letters. “One of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,” says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., “was that DNA actually stores information-the detailed instructions for assembling proteins-in the form of a four-character digital code”
It is hard to fathom, but the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopaedia Britannica-an incredible 384 volumes” worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves!
Yet in their actual size-which is only two millionths of a millimeter thick-a teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and “there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written” (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334).
Who or what could miniaturize such information and place this enormous number of ‘letters’ in their proper sequence as a genetic instruction manual? Could evolution have gradually come up with a system like this?
This type of high-level information has been found to originate only from an intelligent source.
Let’s first consider some of the characteristics of this genetic ‘language.’ For it to be rightly called a language, it must contain the following elements: an alphabet or coding system, correct spelling, grammar (a proper arrangement of the words), meaning (semantics) and an intended purpose.
Scientists have found the genetic code has all of these key elements. “The coding regions of DNA,” explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, “have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language”
The only types of communication considered high-level are human languages, artificial languages such as computer and Morse codes and the genetic code. No other communication system has been found to contain the basic characteristics of a language.
Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that “DNA is like a software program, only much more complex than anything we’ve ever devised.”
For instance, a book such as Homer’s Iliad contains information, but is the physical book itself information? No, the materials of the book-the paper, ink and glue contain the contents, but they are only a means of transporting it.
If the information in the book was spoken aloud, written in chalk or electronically reproduced in a computer, the information does not suffer qualitatively from the means of transporting it. “In fact the content of the message,” says professor Phillip Johnson, “is independent of the physical makeup of the medium” (Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds, 1997, p. 71).
The same principle is found in the genetic code. The DNA molecule carries the genetic language, but the language itself is independent of its carrier. The same genetic information can be written in a book, stored in a compact disk or sent over the Internet, and yet the quality or content of the message has not changed by changing the means of conveying it.
As George Williams puts it: “The gene is a package of information, not an object. The pattern of base pairs in a DNA molecule specifies the gene. But the DNA molecule is the medium, it’s not the message” (quoted by Johnson, p. 70).
So to believe that the genetic code gradually evolved in Darwinian style would break all the known rules of how matter, energy and the laws of nature work. In fact, there has not been found in nature any example of one information system inside the cell gradually evolving into another functional information program.
Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explains that genetic information is primarily an instruction manual and gives some examples.
He writes: “Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, “Take a ¼-inch nut,” a mutation might say, “Take a ⅜-inch nut.” Or instead of “Place the round peg in the round hole,” we might get “Place the round peg in the square hole” … What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in one step-say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio” (Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41).
Thats impossible..thats the thing
Impressive? Trivial, child like really. That's why it's difficult for alot of people to understand biology and the field of other sciences.
@@alexrattray8807 but humans just spawning is possible?
@@alexrattray8807
Exactly !
To be honest, your style of video editing and overall quality is really evolving I must say
Evolution is easy to disprove. Also on a side note, maybe you are an evolutionist or a proponent of the idea. I was looking for some info on it. I could spend all day researching it but, it would be much easier to ask someone knowledgeable like it always is. Do you happen to know "if the theory is true, then why has no one suggested or attempted to deactivate the 2B gene in the ape creature. Maybe you or someone here can answer and provide a link with the available data including successful experiments. I get not running a trial like this on humans in reverse but, maybe this particular gene selection on ape's?
@@END-oc4qu He did a pun what the hell is wrong with you
@@END-oc4qu you failed miserably, meanwhile fossil records, embryology and domestication are solid proof of evolution
Here come the young earth creationists.
Are you gonna pick up a weapon or what?
@@mut1565 why would anyone need a weapon? Flat/young earthers ruin themselves.
Yeah but they are everywhere so.
@@mut1565 yeah everywhere in the Bible belt
Seriously love your videos, one of my favorite people to watch!
a car has wheels, turbines are wheels. conveyor belt/system use wheels. they all have serve a different purpose but they all have something in common, a designer. tail bone has a use, appendix has a purpose , not vestigios left overs
They all use the same parts therefore God......
Wow a bike and a motorboat both have metal in it I guess they both are made by the same guy then....
Wait I have metal in my body guess a bike engeneer build me then...
@@Zanta100 lNo. Point was like nature has similarity doesn't mean it evolved
Car designs have evolved. Still needed a designer
@@darrelllyvere9029 yes a car needed a designer
a meal needs a cook
so i guess nature was cooked
@@Zanta100 primordial soup, like stew, both cooked for millions of years, new ingredients new species, hmmm.. I don't ???
@@darrelllyvere9029 personal incredulity
This comment section is basically a big war
Love your channel! Thanks for putting such great content out there!
false content
@@Guitor972 cry about it
@@bigsmoke4345 about the fact his content is incorrect ? My view on such things has no inherent affect to my emotions . I suggest you consider before commenting next time .
@@Guitor972 explain how it's false content
@@bigsmoke4345 evolution is false therefore so is his content which supports it .
Yes appreciating evolution is a magical experience! That's what creationists dont realize.
It's magical and the proofs of it are like magic tricks, they seem real until you notice the trick behind them...
Or possibly this is all evidence that a creator used a similar process in creating all things. Like how many or all of an authors books have a familiar ring to them. Or how one can usually identify the work of an artist by observing familiar traits.
I've studied much evolution and creation and in the story of DNA I find it very difficult if not impossible to imagine how so much detailed information contained within each strand could've been arranged through natural mechanical processes.
Your failure to understand it doesn't mean it isn't true.
@@miri8851 You're right it doesn't. All I'm saying is I've given very serious attention to both sides of this debate and the more I learn the harder it is for me to believe someone or something didn't create it. And as being more of a mathematician than anything else I always wind up getting stuck on the probabilities which are insurmountable.
@@michaelheberger3075 there is no "both sides of this debate". Thats the delusion creationists try to create, the "debate" (if there ever was one) has long been settled. But since you seem to be a conspiracy theorist generally i dont doubt you only inform yourself so far that it matches your worldview of it being "illogical".
As a "mathematician" you should know that given enough time and chances even the smallest of chances eventually reaches a propablity of ~100%. Seeing that our universe is for all intents and purpuses basically infinite, propability is absolutely no problem.
Also you're creating the same problem every creationist creates:
"Evoltion needs a designer, its too complex"
"Well then who did design the designer, given he is even more complex"
"The designer doesnt need a designer, hes an exception"
Well then your DNA can be an exception just as well.
Also evolution didnt just "pop DNA into existence" like magic, i really doubt you informed yourself. Seeing your View history i am not surprised.
@@NoMementoMori Throwing unfounded accusations seriously dilutes your credibility. It seems your issue here is personal because almost none of your response applies to me. Being skeptical in no way makes a person even remotely conspiratorial. There's a growing number of highly educated non religious scientists who have begun to doubt natural selection. Try mocking them see where that gets ya.
Well they were chemical processes. I thought you claimed to have studied this?