One of minor correction in this video. Positive reinforcement is the addition of a stimuli that may reinforce behavior. Negative reinforcement is the removal of a stimuli that may reinforce behavior.
Another problem with this guy's theory is that rewards and penalties those are not always tangible or observable or manifest. BF Skinner underestimates man's fear of consequence, which is the way Nietzsche talks about how the Barbarian is always afraid of some overwhelming Doom
It may appear that way but to me it appears as conditioning people, on the one hand the student and as much the educator too, to be more effective and productive in what they love doing.
So if you put your hand on a hot stove and it burns you you’re being programmed? No. It’s a stimuli that causes pain and your body reacts and pulls away automatically bc it has a need meet (to protect itself) and thus responds. That’s also a part of behavior and behaviorism. Bc now you’ll avoid the stove areas that are hot - due to the punisher (pain).
The characterisation of "the environment" in this representation is skewed, as if we are talking about something unnatural og stylized. That is a gross misrepresentation of the simple ways in which behavior can be changed, as explained much more elegantly and precise by Burrhus Frederic Skinner. In this case I think something could be gained by some more reading on the topic.
How the hell is this guy going to disregard internal mental events but on the other hand say that he's interested in the causality of action? This is flabbergastery.
Pure lunacy. I suppose if you need to cram on this to pass a test then the video is helpful. But if you have any sense of normal human morality this is garbage
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.6 (2/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GgeGQOP10RQ/mqdefault.jpg)
At minute 3:50 an error crept in. Reinforcers increase the likelihood that behavior will be shown in the future.
I appreciate this lecture. it has finally cleared my concepts.
One of minor correction in this video. Positive reinforcement is the addition of a stimuli that may reinforce behavior. Negative reinforcement is the removal of a stimuli that may reinforce behavior.
Stimulus is singular, stimuli is plural.
Appreciation for you good try of presenting the lectures of good quality
Absolutely brilliant and very helpful for my nursing assignment!
APA citation for this video. Help a sister out taking a Learning and Cognition class.
“There is nothing impossible to they who will try.”
- Alexander the Great
Dr crossen made us learn so much on skinner. Feel like I’ve known him…
While writing Reinforcers' nature, the word "neither" needs to be deleted as it is not uttered. Thanks.
Thank you!
Thank you❤❤❤❤
Another problem with this guy's theory is that rewards and penalties those are not always tangible or observable or manifest. BF Skinner underestimates man's fear of consequence, which is the way Nietzsche talks about how the Barbarian is always afraid of some overwhelming Doom
This is not learning, it is programming.
Thanks for sharing your point of view
It may appear that way but to me it appears as conditioning people, on the one hand the student and as much the educator too, to be more effective and productive in what they love doing.
So if you put your hand on a hot stove and it burns you you’re being programmed? No.
It’s a stimuli that causes pain and your body reacts and pulls away automatically bc it has a need meet (to protect itself) and thus responds. That’s also a part of behavior and behaviorism. Bc now you’ll avoid the stove areas that are hot - due to the punisher (pain).
That’s cool that my last name is the same as a Genius
Same
The characterisation of "the environment" in this representation is skewed, as if we are talking about something unnatural og stylized. That is a gross misrepresentation of the simple ways in which behavior can be changed, as explained much more elegantly and precise by Burrhus Frederic Skinner. In this case I think something could be gained by some more reading on the topic.
Absolute content.
How the hell is this guy going to disregard internal mental events but on the other hand say that he's interested in the causality of action? This is flabbergastery.
Martin Daniel Hernandez Barbara Jackson Brian
Oh boy another physicoanisims dont need any more isiams
Pure lunacy. I suppose if you need to cram on this to pass a test then the video is helpful. But if you have any sense of normal human morality this is garbage
How many lives have been downgraded by our educators treating us like lab rats. Do you want your children "trained" or educated?