One of minor correction in this video. Positive reinforcement is the addition of a stimuli that may reinforce behavior. Negative reinforcement is the removal of a stimuli that may reinforce behavior.
Another problem with this guy's theory is that rewards and penalties those are not always tangible or observable or manifest. BF Skinner underestimates man's fear of consequence, which is the way Nietzsche talks about how the Barbarian is always afraid of some overwhelming Doom
It may appear that way but to me it appears as conditioning people, on the one hand the student and as much the educator too, to be more effective and productive in what they love doing.
So if you put your hand on a hot stove and it burns you you’re being programmed? No. It’s a stimuli that causes pain and your body reacts and pulls away automatically bc it has a need meet (to protect itself) and thus responds. That’s also a part of behavior and behaviorism. Bc now you’ll avoid the stove areas that are hot - due to the punisher (pain).
How the hell is this guy going to disregard internal mental events but on the other hand say that he's interested in the causality of action? This is flabbergastery.
The characterisation of "the environment" in this representation is skewed, as if we are talking about something unnatural og stylized. That is a gross misrepresentation of the simple ways in which behavior can be changed, as explained much more elegantly and precise by Burrhus Frederic Skinner. In this case I think something could be gained by some more reading on the topic.
Pure lunacy. I suppose if you need to cram on this to pass a test then the video is helpful. But if you have any sense of normal human morality this is garbage
At minute 3:50 an error crept in. Reinforcers increase the likelihood that behavior will be shown in the future.
I appreciate this lecture. it has finally cleared my concepts.
Appreciation for you good try of presenting the lectures of good quality
APA citation for this video. Help a sister out taking a Learning and Cognition class.
Absolutely brilliant and very helpful for my nursing assignment!
This is so helpful. I would like to inform you that I used some of the details in this video for my PowerPoint. 😊 Thank you very much
One of minor correction in this video. Positive reinforcement is the addition of a stimuli that may reinforce behavior. Negative reinforcement is the removal of a stimuli that may reinforce behavior.
Stimulus is singular, stimuli is plural.
“There is nothing impossible to they who will try.”
- Alexander the Great
Dr crossen made us learn so much on skinner. Feel like I’ve known him…
Thank you❤❤❤❤
While writing Reinforcers' nature, the word "neither" needs to be deleted as it is not uttered. Thanks.
Thank you!
Another problem with this guy's theory is that rewards and penalties those are not always tangible or observable or manifest. BF Skinner underestimates man's fear of consequence, which is the way Nietzsche talks about how the Barbarian is always afraid of some overwhelming Doom
This is not learning, it is programming.
Thanks for sharing your point of view
It may appear that way but to me it appears as conditioning people, on the one hand the student and as much the educator too, to be more effective and productive in what they love doing.
So if you put your hand on a hot stove and it burns you you’re being programmed? No.
It’s a stimuli that causes pain and your body reacts and pulls away automatically bc it has a need meet (to protect itself) and thus responds. That’s also a part of behavior and behaviorism. Bc now you’ll avoid the stove areas that are hot - due to the punisher (pain).
That’s cool that my last name is the same as a Genius
Same
Absolute content.
How the hell is this guy going to disregard internal mental events but on the other hand say that he's interested in the causality of action? This is flabbergastery.
The characterisation of "the environment" in this representation is skewed, as if we are talking about something unnatural og stylized. That is a gross misrepresentation of the simple ways in which behavior can be changed, as explained much more elegantly and precise by Burrhus Frederic Skinner. In this case I think something could be gained by some more reading on the topic.
Oh boy another physicoanisims dont need any more isiams
How many lives have been downgraded by our educators treating us like lab rats. Do you want your children "trained" or educated?
Pure lunacy. I suppose if you need to cram on this to pass a test then the video is helpful. But if you have any sense of normal human morality this is garbage