Great building build by responsible developer. Govermemt should make it a must for developer to build amneties like bus stop, walking path or park withiin certain distance range out of the building area.
Well it depends on the requirement of each individual sites and authorities will impose different criteria accordingly. But the developer chose to execute them in a beautiful approach=) Thanks for watching Brandon!
I like the facade and the developer responsiveness. I hope they continue delivering high quality products like this in the future. as usual, thanks for covering and showing us around Sean
I've personally own property from developer with this attitude towards customers. i was surprise and very happy as they still entertain resident concern despite after 5 years VP. in fact, when i got married, my wife and i purchase property from the same developer. happy customer, return customer!
I'm so glad that you pointed out the Universal Design concept here. UD also benefits those using strollers. And for also pointing out that it's pet friendly. As always, enjoy your assessment.
Hi Sean, thanks for doing a thorough review on the Riyang development, my personal thought about the 3 things you mentioned could be based on the authority requirements rather than the developer's generosity, but of course no doubt to say that the developer has also done some great effort to amplify the quality of their landscaping and architectural design. The 3 things to clarify as below: 1. Under DBKL requirement, the development must have 10% green on soil area, the developer chose to place the landscape at the entrance because behind the Riyang will be the RumaWIP - Selesa apartment. I doubt if they can place it in the middle due to the site constraint. 2. Under some local authorities' guideline, all residential and commercial shall provide UD access, this include tactile flooring, disabled ramps and OKU carparking, the covered walkway that link to the bus stop could be part of the requirement as well. 3. Under BOMBA requirement, the refuse chamber is placed inside the fire protected lobby, hence a fire door is needed in the event of fire because rubbish is flammable, but of course it does help to keep the smell away from the corridor. Any chance to do the review on the Selesa Apartment (RUMAWIP)? I'm curious to know if the developer can provide the same quality like Riyang as both towers share the same podium.
Well you're right Nick. But many business oriented developers would've went for the easy way out instead of designing around the boundary and requirements. 1. I could've just leave it as turfs instead of dressing up the compound to be safe for children. Imagine the cost of landscape and fences. 2. We have visited so many projects without compliance to those requirements. OKU carparks are never to be found, ramps that does not obey to the gradient and etc. Plus the developer could've just covered up the walkway using simple steel structures. But they chose to design the entire exterior with a similar language that integrates smoothly with their entrance lobby. 3. Yes you're right. But this is one of the rare refuse chambers that provided recycle bins. The treatment of the room is pretty standard. Anyway, thank you so much for sharing but I would like to give compliments when the teams deserves it. We have visited so many compliance oriented approaches using minimal cost instead of putting in design thoughts. Let me check on the access to that RumaWIP=)
Agree with your points. As i know, is to fulfil dbkl requirements only. Take OKU car parks as example, OKU car park for rumahwip selesa development was at main entrance, far away to the lift.
@@salehachang3991 wow... can't believe they approve that, if MBPJ, it has to be right next to the lift lobby, without UD approval, U won't obtain BP approval.
@@iherng Thanks Sean! This development caught my attention due to 2 factors :- the first factor is the unique architectural features, the tectonic quality via unique vent block pattern and the vibrate landscape quality. Your drone has brought us to another level to view the property that capture the overall site context, its like seeing a big picture of the product rather than bit and pieces of the good looking images only. The 2nd factor is the Sub-MC issue of this development. I'm not a strata management expert on this topic, perhaps you can share your thought about owning a Sub-MC property where free cost and RumaWIP are built under 1 land parcel, should I just purchase RumaWIP instead since I can enjoy the same benefits of the high end common property with free cost?
@@iherng Tqvm Sean! I’m watching your TH-cam videos almost the whole day of my free time! I have learnt a lot a lot by watching the invaluable infos you are sharing! May Almighty God bless you n family with Health , Wealth and Success!🙏🏻
Well everyone will have their own preference on projects. Do look through the playlist for the different TODs that I've covered yea. Anyway, thanks for watching=)
this building at one time point, there was a few unit for auction! yes, at least 5 unit i saw for the passed 2 years and the price is so attractive. hahaha
Hey Shaun, thanks for the great review! I'm wondering what do you think about the 8th & Stellar in Sri Petaling? because I'm considering about that project, look forward to your reply! THANKS =)
I stay opposite to it..i heard launching price at 600k...personnaly dont think its worth the money...better pick around tat area will be Le Pavillion...sub sales from 650k and walking distance to macdonald, starbuck, colombia hospital.
@@brandonwoo8299 thank you for your opinion! Do you mean it is not worth it only by location-wise? Yeah I understand le pavi is a lot more convenient but I'm more in love with the building layout and facilities of HH. 😍
Speaking of responsive developer. Haiya. I just bought a unit at Lonnnngggg River and the developer is really ... well what can i say ... haiya! This kind of thing you will never know until you VP. So really unlucky for me. Sad.
Wonder why you didnt show the facility floor lift lobby. i think some rumahwip or low cost condo looks better. Agree with some viewers, looks like a paid review.
I certainly hope you can show us a rumahwip that looks better than this. Kindly enlighten us:) And since this is a unit offered to us by an audience, it's entirely up to you whether is it paid or not.
Sean, I think when you see a developer responding to complaints from residents, the reaction shouldn't be that "they're spoiling the market". Similarly, residents have a valid voice about the quality of the common areas, even though the exact details are not in the SPA. You could apply the same logic to 10mil condo too, if the common areas were not up to par. I'm sure we all want to see continued improvement in the quality of property development in Malaysia. The extent to which you repeatedly stated they're spoiling the market, to the point that residents shouldn't provide relevant feedback, could be used as validation by developers to NOT improve their quality and responsiveness. Good informative video apart from that!
So, my argument is then what's the benchmark of "not up to par"? The fact of me repeating that statement numerous times is to remind buyers about our rights are only tied to the SPA. Hence we need to learn how to show appreciation when we come across responsible developers. Usual developers will just play by the book but I think this team went above and beyond. Yes I want to see improvements in quality definitely but our actions as buyers are not helping. I agree to the statement "relevant" but does that apply to the remarks made by all buyers. It just hurts my feelings when you see all the hard work done by the team being seen as 'con jobs'. Especially when you have the director attending to your complaints personally, which shows their commitment to deliver but we also have to understand the limit of our requests. Everything is still tied to the agreement we signed with the developer. So we must understand what is the "par" level. Anyway, thanks for watching.
@@iherng therein lies the rub - the SPA does not specify the exact materials, finishing, and workmanship in most areas (certainly common areas). In a truly fair world, these would be spelled out to a tee, so consumers would know exactly what their money is buying into. But the reality is that it's not and there's a fair amount of discretion on the part of developers. We can research all we want, but in the end a large extent of the quality you receive depends on the developer's whims and fancies. You could buy a condo for 10mil and if it comes with rumahwip quality and it technically would still not breach the agreement. Which is to say there's not a lot of protection afforded to consumers who fork out a large part of the wealth to purchase a property. We barely have any rights to speak of. It really is up to the residents to argue and fight for what they think is fair, based on the price they paid. My point is when you see a developer responding the complaints, the reaction shouldn't be WHY THEY BOTHER DOING THAT AND SPOIL THE MARKET?. It should instead be more positively reinforced. There will also be a customers who feel very frustrated and voice out in a perhaps disparaging manner. This exists in all businesses. While I won't say it's right, I would think a business leader and CEO would be more than capable of weathering such comments from a small minority of people. Based on specific words you used in your video/comments, I'm sure you've had some form of access to the content of community group. For what it's worth, I do think most feedback provided there has been relevant and civil.
Absolutely right Kevin!! And that's one big reason why I'm doing all these review videos. Besides entertaining *I hope, I wish every new purchaser will understand the limit of the SPA. Then how do we then gauge the relevant or appropriate finishing levels. Well, obviously it's that line "borderline spoil market" that you're ready annoyed with. I do agree that it could reiterated better, but to me... It's more than "great job" when the team is putting themselves out there. Also with the experience of being in a development team before, those remarks made resonates deeply with me. Anyway, thank you so much for correcting me. I'm grateful for the thought exchanges and it's great to see andiences voicing out true comments:)
Get owners who stayed there to comment here as well to balance out the overly angelic review of this video 🤣🤣🤣. Of course, the ones wanting to rent it out will shoe shine all the cons. Can’t say it’s a great review, seems too biased.
Great building build by responsible developer. Govermemt should make it a must for developer to build amneties like bus stop, walking path or park withiin certain distance range out of the building area.
Well it depends on the requirement of each individual sites and authorities will impose different criteria accordingly. But the developer chose to execute them in a beautiful approach=)
Thanks for watching Brandon!
I like the facade and the developer responsiveness. I hope they continue delivering high quality products like this in the future. as usual, thanks for covering and showing us around Sean
I've personally own property from developer with this attitude towards customers. i was surprise and very happy as they still entertain resident concern despite after 5 years VP. in fact, when i got married, my wife and i purchase property from the same developer. happy customer, return customer!
That's a great sharing Naqib. Hopefully more developers will aim to be at such standards=)
Thanks!
I'm so glad that you pointed out the Universal Design concept here. UD also benefits those using strollers. And for also pointing out that it's pet friendly. As always, enjoy your assessment.
Thanks for watching Cheng!! I really appreciate it=)
One of my favourite project. Thank you so much for reviewing.
Thanks for watching Bentley!!
Hi Sean, thanks for doing a thorough review on the Riyang development, my personal thought about the 3 things you mentioned could be based on the authority requirements rather than the developer's generosity, but of course no doubt to say that the developer has also done some great effort to amplify the quality of their landscaping and architectural design. The 3 things to clarify as below:
1. Under DBKL requirement, the development must have 10% green on soil area, the developer chose to place the landscape at the entrance because behind the Riyang will be the RumaWIP - Selesa apartment. I doubt if they can place it in the middle due to the site constraint.
2. Under some local authorities' guideline, all residential and commercial shall provide UD access, this include tactile flooring, disabled ramps and OKU carparking, the covered walkway that link to the bus stop could be part of the requirement as well.
3. Under BOMBA requirement, the refuse chamber is placed inside the fire protected lobby, hence a fire door is needed in the event of fire because rubbish is flammable, but of course it does help to keep the smell away from the corridor.
Any chance to do the review on the Selesa Apartment (RUMAWIP)? I'm curious to know if the developer can provide the same quality like Riyang as both towers share the same podium.
Well you're right Nick. But many business oriented developers would've went for the easy way out instead of designing around the boundary and requirements.
1. I could've just leave it as turfs instead of dressing up the compound to be safe for children. Imagine the cost of landscape and fences.
2. We have visited so many projects without compliance to those requirements. OKU carparks are never to be found, ramps that does not obey to the gradient and etc. Plus the developer could've just covered up the walkway using simple steel structures. But they chose to design the entire exterior with a similar language that integrates smoothly with their entrance lobby.
3. Yes you're right. But this is one of the rare refuse chambers that provided recycle bins. The treatment of the room is pretty standard.
Anyway, thank you so much for sharing but I would like to give compliments when the teams deserves it. We have visited so many compliance oriented approaches using minimal cost instead of putting in design thoughts.
Let me check on the access to that RumaWIP=)
Agree with your points. As i know, is to fulfil dbkl requirements only. Take OKU car parks as example, OKU car park for rumahwip selesa development was at main entrance, far away to the lift.
@@salehachang3991 wow... can't believe they approve that, if MBPJ, it has to be right next to the lift lobby, without UD approval, U won't obtain BP approval.
@@iherng Thanks Sean! This development caught my attention due to 2 factors :- the first factor is the unique architectural features, the tectonic quality via unique vent block pattern and the vibrate landscape quality. Your drone has brought us to another level to view the property that capture the overall site context, its like seeing a big picture of the product rather than bit and pieces of the good looking images only.
The 2nd factor is the Sub-MC issue of this development. I'm not a strata management expert on this topic, perhaps you can share your thought about owning a Sub-MC property where free cost and RumaWIP are built under 1 land parcel, should I just purchase RumaWIP instead since I can enjoy the same benefits of the high end common property with free cost?
Wow I like the design and the balcony
Glad you like it Gashz=)
Very nice development. Pluses far outweigh the minuses. Close enough by mass transit to KLCC. 2 big bedrooms. Very nice master bath.
Thanks for watching Mark!!
Woww.. design is awesome 👍
Thanks for watching Raffles:)
Overall one of the well-designed condo 🤩
Yupe. Thanks for watching 😁
Nice review as usual ! Would love to see review for IJM Riana Dutamas or Riana South project !
Let me squeeze into my schedule yea=)
Do a review on pros n cons on mixed developments project. Thanks!
Do a review on Aster Green @ Sri Petaling please. Wanna know how you think of that project. Cheers, bro.
you can check out Le Yuan residence opposite for UOA project to see how well constructed they are. Aster Green should be of similar build.
So glad the landscape architect did a good job!
Yupe. Thanks for watching Dinesh!
Great video as usual!
Glad you enjoyed it Matthew. Thank you so much for watching=)
Can you do a review on J Dupion, Taman Pertama ?
Thanks Sean
Let me try yea Teddy=)
If have time , pls review the suria pantai residence in pantai kl , rumawip unit .
Sean how you think about meta city@seri kembangan?
I think that's the most affordable TOD development around Klang Valley currently.
As always the great reviews from our brother Sean! Love to watch!
Could you please kindly do Waltz Residences if okay 🙏🏻?
I will try my best to do after the lockdown, but no promises yet=)
@@iherng Tqvm Sean! I’m watching your TH-cam videos almost the whole day of my free time! I have learnt a lot a lot by watching the invaluable infos you are sharing! May Almighty God bless you n family with Health , Wealth and Success!🙏🏻
That balcony is so nice!
Yes it is!! Thanks for watching Jonathan=)
I burst out laughing at 6:46 " if they fall its ok because they use rubber tiles to avoid concussion but your bone still break" 🤣 lol ok
Hahahahaha!! It's true.
Thanks for watching Naqi:)
Make more TOD kind of videos. I think people wanna know due to its transport integrated nature which enables mobility at a convenient price.
Well everyone will have their own preference on projects. Do look through the playlist for the different TODs that I've covered yea.
Anyway, thanks for watching=)
nice video as always, had a visits here few weeks ago. It will be nice if you can pay a visit to Goodwood Residence at Bangsar South.
Let me arrange yea Alvin. Thanks for watching!!
Thanks for another great review.
you got my attention at "pet friendly"
Hahahaha. It's such an rare piece to have that feature to accommodate furry friends=)
yes, if only I knew. Too late now, missed the boat
So this is what an RM1.0 million condo looks like :D
Thanks for watching Chungus=)
Hi can you review bloomsvale?
I will try to squeeze in my schedule yea Geraldine=)
@@iherng you can take reference to Residency V @ OKR built also by Kerjaya Prospek. Bloomsvale interior furnishing resembles closely to RV.
Review on SkyMeridien @ Sentul East please
Let me try yea Edwin=)
hw much ya for this project ??
this building at one time point, there was a few unit for auction! yes, at least 5 unit i saw for the passed 2 years and the price is so attractive. hahaha
That's too bad.
Hi Sean, could you have a review on Tuai Residence @ Setia Alam? Also the same developer as this project.
I just went!! Stay tuned yea:)
Pet Friendly Apartment, wowerz
Yes, pretty rare to come by=)
Thanks for watching Pizza!!
Can u review Goodwood Residences @Bangsar South?
Hi , Sean. Can you do a review on Ava Residence, Kiara Bay? Thanks.
Can you do a review on East Parc Menjalara pls? Thank you
I will try yea. Thanks for watching Jack:)
I give plus point for the facade design and the material used but the colour at the facilities floor is really out lol
It was requested by the residents apparently hahaha:)
Hi Sifu, can you pls review the upcoming NEST2 Residence at OKR? Thank you so so much
11:04 huge mirror you mean :D
Er... Yea hahahah=)
Hey Shaun, thanks for the great review! I'm wondering what do you think about the 8th & Stellar in Sri Petaling? because I'm considering about that project, look forward to your reply! THANKS =)
Very nice unit, how much did your fd spent for it?
Approximately RM 100k I think, well this is based on my estimation=)
Can you review Duta Park Residence?😃
I will try to squeeze in my schedule Ariavril=)
Hello Sean! Have you heard about Hillcrest Heights in Puchong Utama? VP around next Jan. Would love to get your opinion on it 😁
I stay opposite to it..i heard launching price at 600k...personnaly dont think its worth the money...better pick around tat area will be Le Pavillion...sub sales from 650k and walking distance to macdonald, starbuck, colombia hospital.
@@brandonwoo8299 thank you for your opinion! Do you mean it is not worth it only by location-wise? Yeah I understand le pavi is a lot more convenient but I'm more in love with the building layout and facilities of HH. 😍
@@rccx2393xp hmmm..from the appearance and location it dont seems worth 600k...if you yet to buy it i suggest you look at Le Pavillion instead.
Can you do a property review on AraTre' Residences? Appreciate if you can!!
Let me try yea JY. Thanks for watching!!
Thank you so much!!
algo comment! great review 👍
The property review didn’t mention connect to rumahwip which is important point. Besides, pasar malam just in front of Riyang main entrance.
got rumahwip connected ? share same facilities?
Nice! But can u review a bungalow or something else other than an apartment in the next video?
Have you checked out the other 151 projects that I've reviewed? There are different types of properties to visit=)
Thanks for watching!
Speaking of responsive developer. Haiya. I just bought a unit at Lonnnngggg River and the developer is really ... well what can i say ... haiya! This kind of thing you will never know until you VP. So really unlucky for me. Sad.
Hence I emphasize a lot on informed decisions!!
Thanks for sharing your story Kelvin.
I see Laphroaig I like!
2:30 Trypophobia cannot tahan that concrete block facade
Hahahahahahahahah. Never thought of that hahahaha *still laughing.
i live nearby here... yes, its busy... but not too busy... still acceptable... love this project, but too expensive for me to own.. =(
Appreciate the insights Tae. Thanks for sharing=)
Every Monday night is a nightmare. You didn’t mentioned there is a pasar malam in front of the main road every Monday night
Too expensive
Wonder why you didnt show the facility floor lift lobby. i think some rumahwip or low cost condo looks better.
Agree with some viewers, looks like a paid review.
I certainly hope you can show us a rumahwip that looks better than this. Kindly enlighten us:)
And since this is a unit offered to us by an audience, it's entirely up to you whether is it paid or not.
Sean, I think when you see a developer responding to complaints from residents, the reaction shouldn't be that "they're spoiling the market". Similarly, residents have a valid voice about the quality of the common areas, even though the exact details are not in the SPA. You could apply the same logic to 10mil condo too, if the common areas were not up to par.
I'm sure we all want to see continued improvement in the quality of property development in Malaysia. The extent to which you repeatedly stated they're spoiling the market, to the point that residents shouldn't provide relevant feedback, could be used as validation by developers to NOT improve their quality and responsiveness.
Good informative video apart from that!
So, my argument is then what's the benchmark of "not up to par"?
The fact of me repeating that statement numerous times is to remind buyers about our rights are only tied to the SPA. Hence we need to learn how to show appreciation when we come across responsible developers. Usual developers will just play by the book but I think this team went above and beyond.
Yes I want to see improvements in quality definitely but our actions as buyers are not helping. I agree to the statement "relevant" but does that apply to the remarks made by all buyers. It just hurts my feelings when you see all the hard work done by the team being seen as 'con jobs'. Especially when you have the director attending to your complaints personally, which shows their commitment to deliver but we also have to understand the limit of our requests.
Everything is still tied to the agreement we signed with the developer. So we must understand what is the "par" level.
Anyway, thanks for watching.
@@iherng therein lies the rub - the SPA does not specify the exact materials, finishing, and workmanship in most areas (certainly common areas). In a truly fair world, these would be spelled out to a tee, so consumers would know exactly what their money is buying into. But the reality is that it's not and there's a fair amount of discretion on the part of developers. We can research all we want, but in the end a large extent of the quality you receive depends on the developer's whims and fancies. You could buy a condo for 10mil and if it comes with rumahwip quality and it technically would still not breach the agreement.
Which is to say there's not a lot of protection afforded to consumers who fork out a large part of the wealth to purchase a property. We barely have any rights to speak of. It really is up to the residents to argue and fight for what they think is fair, based on the price they paid.
My point is when you see a developer responding the complaints, the reaction shouldn't be WHY THEY BOTHER DOING THAT AND SPOIL THE MARKET?. It should instead be more positively reinforced.
There will also be a customers who feel very frustrated and voice out in a perhaps disparaging manner. This exists in all businesses. While I won't say it's right, I would think a business leader and CEO would be more than capable of weathering such comments from a small minority of people.
Based on specific words you used in your video/comments, I'm sure you've had some form of access to the content of community group. For what it's worth, I do think most feedback provided there has been relevant and civil.
Absolutely right Kevin!! And that's one big reason why I'm doing all these review videos. Besides entertaining *I hope, I wish every new purchaser will understand the limit of the SPA. Then how do we then gauge the relevant or appropriate finishing levels.
Well, obviously it's that line "borderline spoil market" that you're ready annoyed with. I do agree that it could reiterated better, but to me... It's more than "great job" when the team is putting themselves out there. Also with the experience of being in a development team before, those remarks made resonates deeply with me.
Anyway, thank you so much for correcting me. I'm grateful for the thought exchanges and it's great to see andiences voicing out true comments:)
Seems like a paid review 😁.
Get owners who stayed there to comment here as well to balance out the overly angelic review of this video 🤣🤣🤣.
Of course, the ones wanting to rent it out will shoe shine all the cons.
Can’t say it’s a great review, seems too biased.
Thanks for watching yea:)
@@iherng
Don’t let the CEO put words in your mouth.
Most of the word you read out in this video comes directly from his script. 😂😂😂 very obvious.