CORRECTION: In my rush to put out this video, I might have mischaracterized Huberman and Peterson's position on the utility of podcasts. In my commentary I said that they were explaining how necessary it was to be dishonest on social media to propagate the brand, but on reflection, I think they were saying something a little different. In that section they were saying that podcasting over the course of 3 hours is a guarantee that you are watching honest people (in contrast to what you see on social media otherwise) which is to say, you should ONLY trust people who are honest like they are. This was an error on my part that was due to me putting this together in 30 mins. Support this journalism on substack sgcarney.substack.com
CORRECTION: In my rush to put out this video, I might have mischaracterized Huberman and Peterson's position on the utility of podcasts. In my commentary I said that they were explaining how necessary it was to be dishonest on social media to propagate the brand, but on reflection, I think they were saying something a little different. In that section they were saying that podcasting over the course of 3 hours is a guarantee that you are watching honest people (in contrast to what you see on social media otherwise) which is to say, you should ONLY trust people who are honest like they are. This was an error on my part that was due to me putting this together in 30 mins.
@simonburyan1669 it's not even a real correction, he says he "might have" made an error. Maybe he still has doubts that he made an error so he leaves room with the "might have." He is probably waiting for someone to step in and say "nah you got it right the first time." Then the second hedge comes by still (purposefully or accidentally) inferring a major leap in logic when he says "which is to say you should ONLY trust people who are honest like they are." Purposefully is bad actor status, accidentally is incompetent actor status (especially two consecutive cracks at interpretation). Then the third hedge is the "in my rush to put out the content" which is his message to you that accuracy and content quality take a clear back seat to algorithm worship. That's the holy trinity of unaccountability right there!
3:52 “poorly-behaved babies”?!? Babies don’t behave badly or well…they are babies! Their brains are just getting organized. They are only beginning to understand how to process the world.
It's a clip out of context of people oversimplifying the brain. When the clip says "hypothalamus", what they mean is that babies have functioning systems for seeking food, water, comfort, and caregiving - which are driven by mature hypothalamus circuits while the cerebral cortex is immature. "Badly" behaved is just our way of characterizing crying due to hunger, thirst, cold, or lack of attention
I had 6 months of Huberman obsessing and 6 months of Peterson obsession. Realized in both cases they would step out of their area of expertise and into my area with absolute confidence but were pathetically wrong. Obsessed to alarm bells!!
I’m not a fan of Huberman and not much of JP either, but their earlier original content was useful. That being said, building your channel on tearing people down will not get you the kind of success you are looking for unless you focus on MLMs or corrupt CEOs.
Why do you think that the need to say what needs to be said (and in less than 7 mins, rather than 4 hours) is only motivated by "success"? And what is the world coming to, when everything people do is defined as "content"? Considering that the AH and JP discussion has had over 252k views in 24 hours, I don't think a valid critique is really "tearing people down".
I used to watch Jordan Peterson for a laugh in the comments, but thought people would see through him by now. Amazing how they form huge echo chambers around themselves. Now, I leave them to it.
YT tried to push Huberman videos on me, and I never watch RW nonsense on this account. But I do sub a few science based fitness influencers. Glad I got a bad vibe from him, before I clicked on his videos and screwing up my algorithm.
He just noticed that the secular audience were calling him out on his bullshit constantly. He made himself more friendly to the audience that won't. (Not all religious people, just those with an authoritarian mindset)
The arrogance of these two charlatans (a dermatology influencer and a political science undergrad) expecting people to listen to their ramblings for 4 hours! As for Peterson’s obsession with what he "actually" thinks for three or four hours, rather than what he really KNOWS, tells us all we need to know about his approach to science.
There's another way to be. You can take Huberman's oversimplification of neural circuitry as a launching pad for YOUR OWN investigations of behavior from other sources, and leave Huberman (and Petersen) behind.
@ I can't say I know a lot about huberman, but Jordan Peterson isn't a "podcaster". He has a podcast but had done 100x other real world valuable things that don't involve TH-cam, if you think having a podcast is grifting.
You follow protocols, ideology, religion. Its all about following, followers, you are so right! Like if a life had a manual that only they have gotten to see.
CORRECTION: In my rush to put out this video, I might have mischaracterized Huberman and Peterson's position on the utility of podcasts. In my commentary I said that they were explaining how necessary it was to be dishonest on social media to propagate the brand, but on reflection, I think they were saying something a little different. In that section they were saying that podcasting over the course of 3 hours is a guarantee that you are watching honest people (in contrast to what you see on social media otherwise) which is to say, you should ONLY trust people who are honest like they are. This was an error on my part that was due to me putting this together in 30 mins. Support this journalism on substack sgcarney.substack.com
CORRECTION: In my rush to put out this video, I might have mischaracterized Huberman and Peterson's position on the utility of podcasts. In my commentary I said that they were explaining how necessary it was to be dishonest on social media to propagate the brand, but on reflection, I think they were saying something a little different. In that section they were saying that podcasting over the course of 3 hours is a guarantee that you are watching honest people (in contrast to what you see on social media otherwise) which is to say, you should ONLY trust people who are honest like they are. This was an error on my part that was due to me putting this together in 30 mins.
In a world without listening comprehension and inferential skills the badly comprehending influencer is king
This is quite a mayor correction, does this happen to you often?
@simonburyan1669 it's not even a real correction, he says he "might have" made an error. Maybe he still has doubts that he made an error so he leaves room with the "might have." He is probably waiting for someone to step in and say "nah you got it right the first time."
Then the second hedge comes by still (purposefully or accidentally) inferring a major leap in logic when he says "which is to say you should ONLY trust people who are honest like they are." Purposefully is bad actor status, accidentally is incompetent actor status (especially two consecutive cracks at interpretation).
Then the third hedge is the "in my rush to put out the content" which is his message to you that accuracy and content quality take a clear back seat to algorithm worship.
That's the holy trinity of unaccountability right there!
@@simonburyan1669 You need to correct that😂
Dude doesn’t even have the facts about his video right than uploads it and criticizes Huberman n Peterson? Lmao
These guys are so bloody insufferable
3:52 “poorly-behaved babies”?!? Babies don’t behave badly or well…they are babies! Their brains are just getting organized. They are only beginning to understand how to process the world.
Huberman disagrees. He worries about babies biting
Exactly.
It's a clip out of context of people oversimplifying the brain. When the clip says "hypothalamus", what they mean is that babies have functioning systems for seeking food, water, comfort, and caregiving - which are driven by mature hypothalamus circuits while the cerebral cortex is immature. "Badly" behaved is just our way of characterizing crying due to hunger, thirst, cold, or lack of attention
I had 6 months of Huberman obsessing and 6 months of Peterson obsession. Realized in both cases they would step out of their area of expertise and into my area with absolute confidence but were pathetically wrong. Obsessed to alarm bells!!
Right? What's scary is they are just as wrong about the things that aren't your area, but they are so confident! It makes it sound believable
I concur. What is your area of expertise?
Both wanna be cult leaders.
I’m not a fan of Huberman and not much of JP either, but their earlier original content was useful. That being said, building your channel on tearing people down will not get you the kind of success you are looking for unless you focus on MLMs or corrupt CEOs.
This is my back channel. I have no goals here.
Why do you think that the need to say what needs to be said (and in less than 7 mins, rather than 4 hours) is only motivated by "success"? And what is the world coming to, when everything people do is defined as "content"? Considering that the AH and JP discussion has had over 252k views in 24 hours, I don't think a valid critique is really "tearing people down".
I used to watch Jordan Peterson for a laugh in the comments, but thought people would see through him by now. Amazing how they form huge echo chambers around themselves. Now, I leave them to it.
The grifter combo I didn't know I was waiting for. Haha...
YT tried to push Huberman videos on me, and I never watch RW nonsense on this account. But I do sub a few science based fitness influencers. Glad I got a bad vibe from him, before I clicked on his videos and screwing up my algorithm.
Roe Wogan
@therabbithat yeah, I said I don't watch RW nonsense
Huberman changed a LOT when he started to embrace god and religion a while back ago. I think it was the Cameron Hanes effect!!!
Or is it the grifting effect? Seems the religious types are more willing to part with their cash and watch long boring videos about nonsense?
He just noticed that the secular audience were calling him out on his bullshit constantly. He made himself more friendly to the audience that won't. (Not all religious people, just those with an authoritarian mindset)
dude I don’t know what the hell you are reading from this. they literally are saying different things from what your are saying they are saying 😂
This guy hits refresh on his TH-cam feed every couple of minutes waiting for Andrew to upload
he definitely has a crush on Andrew lol
The arrogance of these two charlatans (a dermatology influencer and a political science undergrad) expecting people to listen to their ramblings for 4 hours! As for Peterson’s obsession with what he "actually" thinks for three or four hours, rather than what he really KNOWS, tells us all we need to know about his approach to science.
There's another way to be. You can take Huberman's oversimplification of neural circuitry as a launching pad for YOUR OWN investigations of behavior from other sources, and leave Huberman (and Petersen) behind.
And you're just trying to get clicks off their names and success?
Thanks for liking and subscribing.
@ I did neither
Its better than having clicks off the grifts and brainwashing.
@@bradweinberger6907 That's called sarcasm. You just helped, by leaving comments.
@ I can't say I know a lot about huberman, but Jordan Peterson isn't a "podcaster". He has a podcast but had done 100x other real world valuable things that don't involve TH-cam, if you think having a podcast is grifting.
You follow protocols, ideology, religion. Its all about following, followers, you are so right! Like if a life had a manual that only they have gotten to see.
Didn't know this podcast was up, can't wait to listen
Jordan Peterson is a self righteous smug know it all. He does dress well and has nice cheekbones.
4 hours??
Jordan Peterson was interesting a long time ago but now he just uses his intelligence to grift people and pontificate
Ya'll 'memeber raspberry bulbs? Whatever happen to them?
th-cam.com/video/f76Pee52v-s/w-d-xo.html
Hubernan is a grifter. Peterson knows about psychology at least.
JP…closed body language. What the hell do they know. Oye 🙄
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
😂