ETABS ADVANCE TUTORIAL (PART 5)-RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS-SCALE FACTOR | Sandip Deb
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มี.ค. 2020
- #ETABS #ETABS_ADVANCE #ILUSTRACA
ETABS ADVANCE TUTORIAL (PART 5)-RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS-SCALE FACTOR
This video is all about the Scale factor used in ETABS while doing Response spectrum analysis and it is as per IS 1893:2002/2016
Today's video is sponsored by DREAMSCAPE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTIONS, AGARTALA, TRIPURA
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 68 | คู่เอก "พระจันทร์ฉาย vs โจนาธาน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/F3IM3w-XchI/mqdefault.jpg)
thanks for the explanations. I learned most concepts from your channel only, thorough explanations. All the best for your most success.
❤️💐🙏🙏
hallo vielen Dank für seine Arbeit
Please make a video about Etabs to staad foundation and Etabs to Rcdc
Sir according to IS 1893-2002 this formula is correct... but if we define RSP Function in 2016..thn this preliminary scale factor should be multiplied by 10, just compare both 2002 vs 2016 graphs of RSP function in ETABS..
Sir please do a video on pushover analysis.. me & my friends will be eagerly waiting for it..
Ok.. very soon
@@ilustraca Sir still we are waiting for your pushover analysis in ETABS video.. please make this video sir..
this is advance topic, we'll go step by step... sorry for being late in uploading new video as I'm quite busy in some personal works.. But gonna update soon.
@@ilustraca my final year project is dependent on your video sir.. if you cannot make video soon then sir can we communicate through mail??? my mail id @avb1971998@gmail.com , please do help sir.. thank you..
hello sir for zone 4 we have to add vertical earthquake load cases also....so how to add vertical load cases...in ETABS
My scale factor is 9806.65 initial
After analysis
We get base shear EQX =3230 EQY=2950
SPECX =4560
SPECXY=3567
scale factor not less than 9806.65
Is it correct 🤔
From Nepal, Thank you for such a informative video
i know Im asking the wrong place but does any of you know of a trick to get back into an instagram account??
I was stupid forgot the password. I would appreciate any help you can offer me
@Kaiser Jon instablaster :)
@Johan Joseph I really appreciate your reply. I got to the site thru google and Im trying it out atm.
Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will get back to you later with my results.
@Johan Joseph It worked and I finally got access to my account again. Im so happy!
Thank you so much, you saved my account!
@Kaiser Jon happy to help xD
Sir I have done everything what u showed here in this video but I am getting the base reaction for response spectrum case to be zero…why it is happening and how I remove the error/warning. Please guide sir
Very clear and concise explanation, great!
I wanted to verify one thing: Do we have to apply any scale factor while defining the load combinations (for RS load combinations) or does the scale factor applied as per this video takes care of it?
it does..
@@ilustraca So we would use the combinations as it is, say for example; 1.2 (DL+LL+EQx) and 1.2(DL+LL+RSx) for IS 456:200 code?
Suppose I put initial scale factor as 1 irrespective of it unit or anything but at the end I scale up the response spectrum function as per is 1893 with respect to static load case then what will happen bcz my final scale is correct as per is 1893 and design will be according to that scale factor and not by initial one ?what may be the fault in this process?
Before scaling also u hv lot more things to do.... plz read IS1893 Part 1
Again, to covert the coefficient to Acceleration u need to multiply with g in current unit
I get base shear value for response spectrum cases as zero for both directions. Why??
u might have done a mistake for sure
@@ilustraca I have checked each step multiple times. I have checked the model multiple times.
kindly connect wd me in LinkedIn and send me the file there
@@ilustraca i cannot message on LinkedIn. Can you please share email id..
Hello sir
In Response spectrum analysis why beams are failed in Etabs
I'm try to increase depth and width also but some beam ie 20 % of beams are failed in Etabs any solution Sir.
what is failing reason? check the beam design summary first
@@ilustraca O/S #45 Shear Stress due to Shear Force and Torsion Exceeds Maximum Allowed.
And In Response spectrum you consider only X and Y
Not consider Vertical Z ??
yes.. in critical zones u should take Z direction too
Sir, can I send you my ETABS model? I have some Doubt in my model about failed beams