Stop Running Google Chrome Immediately

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024
  • I warned you when the Manifest v3 rollout was announced, I warned you just before it's started, this is your very final warning to stop running Google Chrome and Chromium if you care about content blockers actually working.
    ==========Support The Channel==========
    ► Patreon: brodierobertso...
    ► Paypal: brodierobertso...
    ► Liberapay: brodierobertso...
    ► Amazon USA: brodierobertso...
    ==========Resources==========
    Ublock Origin FAQ: github.com/uBl...)
    Ublock Origin Wiki: github.com/uBl...
    Adguard MV3: github.com/Adg...
    Adblock Blog: blog.adblockpl...
    Ghostery: chromewebstore...
    PrivacyBadger Issue: github.com/EFF...
    Firefox Post: blog.mozilla.o...
    Vivaldi Post: vivaldi.com/bl...
    =========Video Platforms==========
    🎥 Odysee: brodierobertso...
    🎥 Podcast: techovertea.xy...
    🎮 Gaming: brodierobertso...
    ==========Social Media==========
    🎤 Discord: brodierobertso...
    🐦 Twitter: brodierobertso...
    🌐 Mastodon: brodierobertso...
    🖥️ GitHub: brodierobertso...
    ==========Credits==========
    🎨 Channel Art:
    Profile Picture:
    / supercozman_draws
    #Chromium #Firefox #Chrome #Linux #OpenSource #FOSS
    🎵 Ending music
    Track: Debris & Jonth - Game Time [NCS Release]
    Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.
    Watch: • Debris & Jonth - Game ...
    Free Download / Stream: ncs.io/GameTime
    DISCLOSURE: Wherever possible I use referral links, which means if you click one of the links in this video or description and make a purchase I may receive a small commission or other compensation.

ความคิดเห็น • 1.9K

  • @BrodieRobertson
    @BrodieRobertson  หลายเดือนก่อน +210

    I'm testing out subtitles made with Whisper with a bit of manual editing on top for some videos so if you spot any problems please let me know
    PS. I know Brave has a built in adblocker, that's unaffected, that's why I said it has a built in adblocker, that's unaffected

    • @la.zanmal.
      @la.zanmal. หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Did it also make the thumbnail...?

    • @BrodieRobertson
      @BrodieRobertson  หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      @@la.zanmal. No I'm just stupid

    • @AGamer_2010
      @AGamer_2010 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      ublock origin is spelled wrong sometimes, only thing i spotted

    • @Tailslol
      @Tailslol หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oof firefox is sooooo slooooow. My raspberry pi can barely handle it. And on Android sites looks so broken...

    • @Bob-of-Zoid
      @Bob-of-Zoid หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Tailslol Well, get a real freaking computer! On my AMD Ryzen 7 7500X (8C) its instant everything! I sometimes have ten tabs loaded many with videos... Smooth sailing!😅 So Far add free TH-cam through the board thanks to Arch Linux, Firefox, Ublock Origin, Privacy Badger...

  • @IvanKleshnin
    @IvanKleshnin หลายเดือนก่อน +407

    "You'll watch every Ad and you'll be happy". Nope.

    • @Seriously_Unserious
      @Seriously_Unserious 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I'm using Brave and I can't watch the ads even if I wanted to, YT's anti ad blockers only trigger for me when I turn off Brave Shields and let the ads through, then it flickers on the "don't use ad blockers" popup for a moment and the video player turns black and nothing works. I turn Brave Shields back on, and the page refreshes and the video starts playing normally. Google's attempts to force me to watch their crappy ads which may include scams, literally forces me to block all ads for their platform to even work.

    • @chunkblaster
      @chunkblaster 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +18

      I'll block every add and ill be happy 😎

  • @ApolloTheDerg
    @ApolloTheDerg หลายเดือนก่อน +97

    The internet is unusable without an adblocker. Not only are they annoying, they are literally a risk to your computer.

    • @acoolnameemm
      @acoolnameemm 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

      Dont you love it when you enter a webpage and you get 3 new tabs and 4 new windows?

    • @Grey_Warden_Invasion
      @Grey_Warden_Invasion วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      I regularly see it on the browser at work where I can't install adblock. I don't even use it much - just occasionally for checking an IBAN or an address or the like - but even those short tasks get overloaded with ads and slow the PC down to a crawl until I can finally close the browser again.
      Of course I'm using adblock at home. I don't want my laptop to freeze every five seconds.

  • @lorenzo42p
    @lorenzo42p หลายเดือนก่อน +267

    I will NOT allow any corporation to shove ads in my face. the whole reason I am sick of ads is because these corporations keep pushing the limits to see how much users will put up with. I say NO

    • @jjones503
      @jjones503 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +22

      Enjoy your half hour of ads for a 5 minute clip.

    • @Wendy_O._Koopa
      @Wendy_O._Koopa 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It's like, if watching adds gave you a free service, it would be one thing; _but no._ You have to _pay_ for the internet, to give you all these adds. Sometimes you even need a subscription to a certain site, just to watch adds to view it's content (or at least, that's what they _want)._ But adblockers saved the day! -So far...-

    • @lorenzo42p
      @lorenzo42p 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +22

      @@jjones503 hell fuckin no. I will stop using youtube before I will be forced to watch ads.

    • @jjones503
      @jjones503 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@lorenzo42p I use brave on mobile for TH-cam. I don't get ads. I run a piHole for most other stuff but it doesn't seem to catch youtube ads, but gets about 80% of website ads.

    • @itschamesbitch
      @itschamesbitch 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Cool story, bro

  • @XoaGray
    @XoaGray หลายเดือนก่อน +536

    I gave up on Chrome a long time ago, back when Google quit being the "Don't be evil" company and decided that just straight up being evil was the way to go.

    • @BoredPodcaster
      @BoredPodcaster หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      They've always been this way. They're just tired of trying to deny it, despite the proof constantly being shewn in their face.

    • @khatdubell
      @khatdubell หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      being evil is always the way to go

    • @MudakTheMultiplier
      @MudakTheMultiplier หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      Having your company slogan be "don't be evil" isn't weird, but it _is_ weird if your company slogan _used to be_ "don't be evil"

    • @Not_interestEd-
      @Not_interestEd- หลายเดือนก่อน

      I gave up on Chrome because it was just... bland. There isn't anything it does special, and that's fine for most people. I switched to Opera GX because it actually had a bunch of things I found useful (notably passive background music and workspaces). I then switched to Brave only recently after noting some serious security concerns and _why was it eating 1.3 gigs of RAM on a blank tab!?_ Installed a GitHub RAM cleaner exe (not a bloatware pile of junk), dropped to 500MB actively being used, interesting, something's going on, time to bail.
      Brave doesn't have native workspace functionality which I miss and audio from one tab (or the background music) doesn't mute when another tab is playing audio. Good news is 600MB of RAM is being used on a Twitch page (Brave is Chromium based, I dunno about security, frankly, I don't really care) and the music is easier to customise, since it's no longer reliant on JSON files and jank, which unfortunately leads to the problem that it doesn't begin playing when I open the browser.

    • @E0O2X314FT
      @E0O2X314FT หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I gave up on Chrome when I noticed it started scanning my entire system for viruses... and deleting files.

  • @IamCoalfoot
    @IamCoalfoot หลายเดือนก่อน +112

    Google decides competitors aren't allowed ads, then get butthurt when customers decide they don’t want ads.

    • @AlexFoxken
      @AlexFoxken 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      karma

  • @mawnkey
    @mawnkey หลายเดือนก่อน +256

    It's almost like trusting companies with a financial incentive to force ads on you while censoring the hell out of you is a bad idea or something.

    • @TrippSC2
      @TrippSC2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then you need to keep your eye on Mozilla equally. They acquired an advertising company and have opt out telemetry.

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Sure, you and everyone reading this wants ads. Not one person in the world wants to actually see the video they clicked on. I and trillions of people believe you - no lie. 🙄

  • @davidDN2318
    @davidDN2318 หลายเดือนก่อน +791

    No warning needed for me, we are already on firefox

    • @brambasieldev
      @brambasieldev หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      waring*

    • @rainbowskeppy5292
      @rainbowskeppy5292 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      same

    • @yurimodin7333
      @yurimodin7333 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      always has been

    • @justmeowth9697
      @justmeowth9697 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I can't believe that Firefox is going back.

    • @𪜊
      @𪜊 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      we're*

  • @robina.jensen6114
    @robina.jensen6114 หลายเดือนก่อน +115

    I'm using Firefox. If the day arrives where ad-blocker on youtube no longer works and i'll be forced to see ads on start of video and every 2 minutes of the video, i'll stop using TH-cam!!!
    TH-cam is detroying there own website with ads! If you don't have an ad-blocker, when seeing / listens to music, it will be ruined at every 5 minuttes! I don't want my music disturbed by stupid ads!

    • @woofcaptain8212
      @woofcaptain8212 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I mean that's what they want you to do lol. They're literally losing money on you

    • @robina.jensen6114
      @robina.jensen6114 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@woofcaptain8212 They also loosing money when people start using Odessy or some of the other video platforms and turn there back on TH-cam.

    • @JamesTDG
      @JamesTDG หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      The frequent Hero Wars ads made me install adblock, I am NOT returning to see that... brainrot...

    • @finnishview2933
      @finnishview2933 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@woofcaptain8212 If everyone stop using UT, then we will have another platform what will gain lot of users. Im sure that will happens if youtube totally stop adblockin. If we dont get another popular video sharing service, i simply start to do something else than watch videos. Its big world out there.

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Never had an issue with Chrome. Switched from Firefox years ago because it was crashing so much it became unusable. They probably have fixed the issues by now, but if it ain't broke, don't change it. 🤷‍♂

  • @light-gray
    @light-gray หลายเดือนก่อน +1135

    Google Chrome is the biggest ad for Firefox..

    • @no_name4796
      @no_name4796 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

      Firefox biggest source of money is google
      Man, i really want ladybird to actually become a working browser, and be 100% FOSS, no strings attached

    • @trajectoryunown
      @trajectoryunown หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@no_name4796 I really hope Ladybird gets enough support to release ahead of schedule.
      It's going to be a long 4 years... Might learn Nyxt in the meantime.

    • @Gskvj
      @Gskvj หลายเดือนก่อน +75

      Just as Microsoft is the biggest ad for Linux 😂

    • @pooyataleb2514
      @pooyataleb2514 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      *Brave has entered the chat

    • @cameronbosch1213
      @cameronbosch1213 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Sadly, with the anti-trust case against Google being successful, I doubt Mozilla will survive...

  • @krispee5842
    @krispee5842 หลายเดือนก่อน +155

    Honestly, at this point, the plugins should just say to use Firefox for a better version in their description

    • @veco311
      @veco311 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I imagine that's against google's tos

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      People who say there are issues with Chrome are like the "end is nigh" people. It never actually happens.

    • @duckmeat4674
      @duckmeat4674 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      ​@@aaronmicalowewhy are you shilling for chrome? Can't you recognise having ads is annoying?

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@duckmeat4674 I use Chrome and haven't had ads for many years, so there's just no issue. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

    • @PriceAintRight
      @PriceAintRight 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@aaronmicaloweit's much ado about nothing tbh. But that's just perspective. We're talmbout ads on the internet 😂

  • @TommyGunz_
    @TommyGunz_ หลายเดือนก่อน +346

    The last line you said "maybe you'll just give up on ad-blocking" Not a fucking chance in hell will i ever give up on ad-blocking. I'll go down swinging on that when i go to a website and click on something and have to close 20 tabs just to do the thing i wanna do. Yah fk all the bullshit.

    • @skilletpan5674
      @skilletpan5674 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      Adblock/ublock is the best and first anti virus/malware.

    • @TommyGunz_
      @TommyGunz_ หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@skilletpan5674 As far as anit virus goes theres better things. But its a really good option none the less.

    • @werdfeefs7027
      @werdfeefs7027 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The standalone version of adguard should still work flawlessly for anything except ads injected directly into TH-cam's video stream, so there's that. It's not free, but it is very good value.

    • @DFPercush
      @DFPercush หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I mean, there's always editing the hosts file.

    • @anon_y_mousse
      @anon_y_mousse หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@werdfeefs7027 There is a positive thing about those server side injected ads, you won't have to worry about malicious code running on your system from the ad, hopefully.

  • @mrwang420
    @mrwang420 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +15

    We need an ad blocker that not only blocks but tells the ad system that the ad has been viewed. Instead of blocking it outright. Tricking the system into thinking the ads have been viewed and will move onto the content and they won't know the ad has been blocked.

  • @tato-chip7612
    @tato-chip7612 หลายเดือนก่อน +548

    ITS SO CHROVER.
    BILLIONS MUST WATCH ADS.

    • @no_name4796
      @no_name4796 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      There is so much firefomentum.
      Nah, there really isn't

    • @under6075
      @under6075 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      WERE SO MOZILBACK

    • @domojestic4155
      @domojestic4155 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Web has fallen.
      Upon billions (They) must spy.

    • @PvblivsAelivs
      @PvblivsAelivs หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nonsense. No one "must" watch ads. People can always choose to do without what the ads are paying for. But most people want that yummy yummy content. And they don't want to pay out of pocket.

    • @MNbenMN
      @MNbenMN หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@PvblivsAelivsWhat is your definition of "must"? When something like watching ads is a prerequisite for achieving a goal, that makes it a "must" by most definitions.

  • @TheToastedGoblin
    @TheToastedGoblin หลายเดือนก่อน +77

    If for some reason i cant block youtube ads in any way, we fall back to a "modern DVR" of sorts. Where i just download what i wanna watch instead of watching on youtube directly.

    • @Aeroxima
      @Aeroxima หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They've also been doing things that affect downloading, so that may get more difficult too. Though if the video is viewable, it should still be doable. Probably won't even have to resort to recording the screen... probably

    • @BigMacIIx
      @BigMacIIx หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      With a dns blackhole on my home network, I haven’t seen an ads on TH-cam for years on any of my devices/browsers.

    • @QuickNETTech
      @QuickNETTech หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@BigMacIIxthey're experimenting with ads in the video stream directly so if they go that route you're screwed lol

    • @JamesTDG
      @JamesTDG หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Honestly, I might end up treating YT like how I did to Reddit after they killed 3rd party app support

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe หลายเดือนก่อน

      ublock lite is v3 compliant and works perfectly on Chrome, so there's nothing stopping you from browsing the internet the way you always have.

  • @GoffRokkit
    @GoffRokkit หลายเดือนก่อน +117

    I became a big Firefox user back when ads on IE and official websites like msnbc were downloading malware on your computer just for being on their site. Many years before Chrome existed.
    And I don't intend to leave anytime soon.

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I became a Chrome user as Firefox kept crashing. My v3 ad blocker means I never need to see ads. Haven't seen an add in over 20 years.

    • @skyknight0408
      @skyknight0408 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      @@aaronmicalowe I've been on FF as long as the OP for the same reason and it never did crash, not even once. Sure it's slower than other browsers, but it's always been stable for me and is the last big browser that doesn't come with Google spyware in its code! That's enough reason for me to keep using it!

    • @MsMoonDragoon
      @MsMoonDragoon 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      If firefox is crashing your pc is just shit.

    • @1mariomaniac
      @1mariomaniac 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@aaronmicalowe Specs? I don't think I've never had Firefox crash before, it runs really smooth for me.

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@1mariomaniac It's probably because I have an old computer. Firefox couldn't run on it so I switched to Chrome and all my problems were fixed. I had resisted Chrome for years because I preferred Firefox's GUI, but the crashing became such a problem that it had to go.

  • @pixels_per_minute
    @pixels_per_minute 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +15

    Chrome isn't a browser. It's an ad delivery service, and it's working because it's the biggest advertisement for Firefox.

  • @alpacamale2909
    @alpacamale2909 หลายเดือนก่อน +200

    Bro don't yell at me I'm using everyone's favorite mouthwash: Floorp

    • @vidal9747
      @vidal9747 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I had some serious performance issues with Floorp. I know what you're going to say: skill issue. It is right. But sensible defaults are good and I don't have time to tweak my browser until it works. Firefox just works.

    • @zeineldinfahed4292
      @zeineldinfahed4292 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      GOAT browser

    • @luizzeroxis
      @luizzeroxis หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Honestly, what's up with these terrible names for open source programs? I don't want something called that on my computer.

    • @zeineldinfahed4292
      @zeineldinfahed4292 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@luizzeroxis FOSS: the land of (occasional) mouthfuls

    • @dktol56
      @dktol56 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's both a floor wax and a dessert topping....

  • @MiukuMac
    @MiukuMac หลายเดือนก่อน +99

    On a more serious note, I do not understand why uBlock developers, or those of AdGuard, have not complained to EU about Google's near-monopolistic control over the Chromium project and via it projecting it to every other browser that uses it. It's almost certain that their dominance of the browser market violates EU TFEU Article 102 which prohibits abusive conduct by companies that have a dominant position on a particular market.
    Since reducing security and privacy, which removing adblocking most certainly does, can be seen as harming consumers combined with market dominance is grounds for an anti-trust.. let's get on moving that forward, eh?

    • @rajmajumdar5253
      @rajmajumdar5253 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      That will only work on the EU market if I am not wrong, so outside of the EU they would still do this shit.

    • @MiukuMac
      @MiukuMac หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rajmajumdar5253 You're right. However it would be a start and usually if EU takes a look at something, other regulars tend to get interested - especially if they can fine Google 🙂

    • @Adowrath
      @Adowrath หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@rajmajumdar5253 That'd presume it'd be easy to control an in-EU and outside-EU variant of the same codebase at once.

    • @JamesTDG
      @JamesTDG หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@rajmajumdar5253 Yes, but the fact that the Chromium base would need this tech for the EU, browser devs can just exclusively use the Manifest EU version. If google whines, they can't do jack shit

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They don't need to complain because it's doing no harm. v3 doesn't affect ublock origin.

  • @C1rnobyl
    @C1rnobyl หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    Other browsers based on Chromium should get together and agree to implement an API that gives the same MV2 ad blocking capability to MV3. Essentially implement that capability anyway and only Google Chrome and Edge wouldn't implement them while everyone else does.
    Sure Chrome would not be able to use those extensions but browsers that would implement this API would be able to. Perhaps it will get people moving to Vivaldi or Brave.

    • @Dobaspl
      @Dobaspl หลายเดือนก่อน

      They should create own chromium web store. Its big problem all of the chromium based browser. All used google store.

    • @minilathemayhem
      @minilathemayhem หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Brave has already said they'll be working with plugin devs to provide a way for ad blockers to continue working in Brave even with MV3's implementation. As well, Brave has its own integrated ad blocker that works pretty well in my experience. I think the main issue is that these other browsers use the official Chrome extension store. They all would have to either make their own extension store, or use a common, non-Google extension store to make this effective.

    • @shabadrandhawa3829
      @shabadrandhawa3829 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@minilathemayhemi have a question about brave, is the criticism against it valid, and is it good for privacy, compared to Firefox?

    • @AstoundingAmelia
      @AstoundingAmelia หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@shabadrandhawa3829I don't know The criticisms you're talking about but if you tell me them I can respond, privacy wise, it's quite good compared to most other browsers online including Firefox

    • @yurimodin7333
      @yurimodin7333 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shabadrandhawa3829 guy that started Brave used to be CEO of Mozilla.....he was actually the guy that invented javascript

  • @dreamhollow
    @dreamhollow หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    This is going to be one of the most annoying changes to the overall Internet.
    Worse, this may open up browsers to horrific intrusive malware and bad data again. The sort of things adblockers were starting to block actively.

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have no worries because I use Chrome with a v3 ad blocker. Let them upgrade to v4 and v5 if they like. 🤷‍♂

    • @MsMoonDragoon
      @MsMoonDragoon 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

      Enjoy your malware aaron. Will love to see how long it takes you to come back crying that you now have a crptlocker :)

    • @jacksonbloodmoon3787
      @jacksonbloodmoon3787 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I swapped over from Opera GX to Vivaldi, so far Vivaldi's in-built ad blocker has been flagged by TH-cam and so i disabled it (it has been for quite some time) and U-Block Origin has been the only thing keeping me safe from seeing malware ads and terrible ass shitty ads on TH-cam, other websites both U-Block and Vivaldi's ad blocker have worked amazingly well. But I can see a massive surge to other non-Chromium browsers getting popular and I seriously fucking hope Google or its parent company getting smacked by a lawsuit eventually for the shit they are doing by making ad blockers worse and worse and these ads not being actively monitored for malware or harmful content or content that shouldn't even be allowed on websites where kids can frequent to. Just decided to check if TH-cam still flagged Vivaldi's ad blocker, it no longer gets flagged, so now I will have both active on here.

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@MsMoonDragoon Cultists have been crying, the end is nigh, for decades, yet somehow, we are still here. 🤷‍♂️

    • @chriwehl7173
      @chriwehl7173 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@aaronmicaloweOr maybe you're just binging a series about the end of the world while eating food made off several layers of engineering and... Oh wait, that right, you are.
      And if you can't extrapolate what I am trying to say, let me spell it out.
      Sometimes "the end" isnt a big bang, but a slow fade out.

  • @redchief94
    @redchief94 หลายเดือนก่อน +176

    If they think this is going to work, they've got another thing coming. I WILL touch grass if they push me. I have a fishing pole. I can sub to nebula. I'm NOT going back to ads, and im NOT paying google a penny.

    • @GSBarlev
      @GSBarlev หลายเดือนก่อน

      The sad thing: that's probably the win from Google's perspective. YT _hemorrhages_ money, and if you're blocking ads, you're probably also blocking tracking-without any way to monetize you, you're a straight loss to them in the form of the cost of serving you HD videos of Brodie shilling for Wayland.

    • @SeekingTheLoveThatGodMeans7648
      @SeekingTheLoveThatGodMeans7648 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Fine, though you're kind of lost in the noise to Google. You took a thimble out of the ocean.

    • @ActionGamerAaron
      @ActionGamerAaron หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SeekingTheLoveThatGodMeans7648 You're right that's a great plan, we should just make defeatist posts on the internet instead!

    • @VioletRM
      @VioletRM หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      really stuck it to em, they'll remember that when touching grass and sneeding the good life

    • @Spencer-wc6ew
      @Spencer-wc6ew หลายเดือนก่อน

      Were they getting anything from you before?
      This isn't about people who are vehemently anti-ad. It's for the average person who doesn't care much to begin with. When they realize you can block ads, they'll learn it would require changing their browser and think it's not worth the effort.

  • @michaelc657
    @michaelc657 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Vivaldi and Cromite. Adblockers built into the browser, no need for an extension framework. Throw in a DNS service like NextDNS or running your own Adguard Home instance.

    • @duckmeat4674
      @duckmeat4674 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't promote non free browsers like Vivaldi. Brave or Firefox are better choices

  • @erdanxiloscient3666
    @erdanxiloscient3666 หลายเดือนก่อน +135

    "1 minute ago"
    I feel like I was summoned to the new video telepathically by Brodie himself

    • @no_name4796
      @no_name4796 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Nah, you are just slave to your phone and costantly switch apps to see if any new content is out
      Not dissing you, i am the same

    • @genstian
      @genstian หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No, it summons at 00.00 bulgarian time.

  • @Kevin-ol5gr
    @Kevin-ol5gr 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    Several months ago when youtube was breaking my adblocker on Firefox, I discovered if I link the videos into Discord I could still watch ad free videos that way.

    • @TanukiTracks
      @TanukiTracks 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Sadly that doesn't work anymore in my experience...

  • @petersimmons7833
    @petersimmons7833 หลายเดือนก่อน +139

    Almost like the behavior of a monopolist. We should check to see if anybody has labeled them as such.

    • @cameronbosch1213
      @cameronbosch1213 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@petersimmons7833 the U.S. government did.

    • @printf255
      @printf255 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@cameronbosch1213 that's. the joke.

    • @ashtonmiller-z1n
      @ashtonmiller-z1n หลายเดือนก่อน

      um no realy the us govmrment did offcaly inteh courtsof law say google is a monopoly just a day ago the same time this viedo was posted in fact.

    • @phr3ui559
      @phr3ui559 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ok

    • @finnishview2933
      @finnishview2933 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cameronbosch1213 U.S. gov may fine them 0,00001% of they total profit from one year. Thats what they usually do with big companies.

  • @IDESTROYER236
    @IDESTROYER236 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    If TH-cam goes down the "server-side ads" dark path, I'm going to Vimeo or Dailymotion.

    • @GraveUypo
      @GraveUypo หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      i tried going to other sites but... they're so barren in content :(
      i hate youtube and i hate google, but we need content creators to support other platforms first. and they need us to be there first. chicken and egg situation

    • @dbclass4075
      @dbclass4075 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@GraveUypoFor documentaries at least, there are Nebula and CuriosityStream. But both are subscriptions.

    • @Wolf-wd9cd
      @Wolf-wd9cd หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Block ads and pay creators directly. They can then move away from YT if there's enough support.

    • @maxawilli7
      @maxawilli7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What about rumble

  • @inductivesoul
    @inductivesoul หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    I'm getting sick and tired of these evil company's gladly taking my money, and then bate and switching me with worse and worse features and services... when its a better experience to go out of my way to view content I already paid for by other means.... I'm just wasting my money, I am not getting convenience, or value for my money anymore; and I am sick of it!

    • @_justnick
      @_justnick หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The internet needs a revolution. Big corps need to pay for how they enshittified the internet. But nobody is doing anything, and the average sheep just wants to watch their cringe youtube screaming and doing rtrded faces playing games or pranking people. Even if that means watching 5 minutes of ads and getting pop-ups left and right.

    • @PlayerOfCeleste
      @PlayerOfCeleste หลายเดือนก่อน

      oh no remember they aren’t evil !! “don’t be evil”!!! /j
      fuck google

    • @maudley
      @maudley หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@_justnick I mean the EU has been doing pretty good about defending consumers.

    • @JamesTDG
      @JamesTDG หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ahoy, matey

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is bating you. ublock lite is v3 compliant and works on Chrome. The problem doesn't exist. 🤷‍♂

  • @KawekSL
    @KawekSL หลายเดือนก่อน +106

    it is harmful that ublock origin have lite version (and other adblockers) as most user won't notice (or gonna have placebo effect) and google gonna have easier time "boiling frog". They should simply not support mv3 and more aggressively inform on how/what/why, also they should propose switching browser.

    • @ransan
      @ransan หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      My thoughts exactly

    • @hydra3693
      @hydra3693 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      going scorched earth on blink browsers will hurt uBO adoption, sadly. but they should nudge people to firefox whenever possible

    • @Kevin-jb2pv
      @Kevin-jb2pv หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      The problem is that there are a lot of people using Chrome on locked-down PC's from work and school where they literally have no choice in what browser they use. Some organizations use specialized programs and browser extensions that are 100% reliant on Chrome to function, and lots more organizations simply have chains of command that make it painfully slow for IT departments to get approval to do shit like switch default browsers.
      The biggest hurdle, sadly, is that there are so many tech-unsavvy people out there using Chrome for critical work functions that many decision makers won't be able to see the benefit of switching from Chrome until it starts to personally annoy them.
      My hope is that because Chrome's adblocking is going to be so horribly crippled, that scummy advertisers are going to figure out these new holes fast and bum rush through these new security holes and wreak absolute fucking havoc on the Chrome version of the web, and I think this is going to happen faster than many assume.

    • @robertmarder126
      @robertmarder126 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I recently switched from ublock origin to the lite version, and it works fine. I just run with default settings, and so far I have noticed zero differences.
      I would say the vast majority of users are normal users that don't do a lot of special configuration. For them the lite version is exactly the same as the full version.

    • @KiraSlith
      @KiraSlith หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Kevin-jb2pvThose users can't/shouldn't install adblockers anyways. Moot point.

  • @cristitanase6130
    @cristitanase6130 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Switched to Brave 2 years ago, never looked back!

  • @SirLightfire
    @SirLightfire หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    I've always used FF since switching from IE 11
    And i'm an "adblock or die" type of person

    • @foufoufun
      @foufoufun หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same here, I never liked Chrome for the weirdest reason: the tabs are over the title bar making it annoying to move the window around. The freedom approach around plugins and lack of push for cloud features in Firefox is what made me stay.

    • @aaronmicalowe
      @aaronmicalowe หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why do we never see people who use Chrome bug people into using Firefox? 🤔

    • @otsugua77
      @otsugua77 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I'd rather stop watching youtube than having to watch multiple 2min unskippable ads back to back, it is so predatory, and having the feel of sevurity when oppening a site that you don't know changes the way you use the internet

  • @Zombie_Apocalypse
    @Zombie_Apocalypse 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    I'm not turning off my adblocker for anything. If your thing doesn't work with it, i don't care how good it is, i move on and forget about it.

  • @ransan
    @ransan หลายเดือนก่อน +111

    Ok, weird idea, I don't know how well or how badly this would work but hear me out.
    What if as a counter-move, UBO just outright announces that they will pull out of the Chrome Web Store and unpublish both UBO and UBO Lite themselves?
    If the opponent's goal is to make their extension seem broken and slowly erode its reputation, then why stay?????
    It would be better to voluntarily leave with their reputation intact. Play hard to get, make *power users* chase you to the browsers that do support the features they want to have.
    Also, the normies that refuse to leave Chrome just don't matter anymore in this situation. Continuing to develop a neutered version of the extension for those people will just be a waste of resources.

    • @d_9696
      @d_9696 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They could even spin this around on Cjomium

    • @TheFingerMove
      @TheFingerMove หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      This could backfire because normies don’t think about this. They’ll just download other adblockers and call it a day instead of switching browsers.

    • @jbsxyz9102
      @jbsxyz9102 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      This is the best way! Probably should also start auto-opening a web page on browser start explaining the situation to normies a few weeks before pulling from store.

    • @ransan
      @ransan หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      @@TheFingerMove I don't think getting the "normies" is the thing that matters here. It's about refusing to let the tech giant drag your image down and not wasting development time on a neutered version of the extension. In fact, I think continuing to develop UBO Lite for the "normies" that refuse to leave Chrome would be the mistake in this situation.

    • @bobsinclair8990
      @bobsinclair8990 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@TheFingerMove Normies don't need to know, I will install Firefox and UBO on their linux systems. They wouldn't even know it's not Windows if you don't tell them.

  • @wolfsongrising
    @wolfsongrising 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    This is one of many reasons why I dropped Chrome a long time ago. Not only does my computer run so much better now without chrome overworking my tech, but I am enjoying an experience free of intrusive ads. SO MANY intrusive ads.
    Its sad really. I remember when youtube was less overrun, and I was more willing to support them then. Because it was reasonable, it helped support the content creators as well, and there was this option to skip an ad after 5-15 seconds. It made sense, and there were times I willingly let the ad play because I did appreciate the service. Now its...well, its beyond ridiculous and I'm far more willing to drop youtube than I am to go back. Not while they're using and abusing my time.
    I was willing once before. Now, no more. Not until they get their crap together.

  • @KernelPanic0
    @KernelPanic0 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Thank you for the captions!
    Channels ten times your size often don't even bother..

    • @Kanbei11
      @Kanbei11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It's a pet peeve of mine. IMO channels over a certain size (10k subs) should require subtitles in the native language of their video.
      For me Tom Scott is the pinnacle of subtitles on TH-cam

    • @BrodieRobertson
      @BrodieRobertson  หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It's something new I'm trying out, they're being generated with Whisper and I'm manually cleaning them up so please let me know if you spot any issues

  • @Roger-ws8rj
    @Roger-ws8rj หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I just used ad block on google chrome up until a couple months ago, 1 day, I logged on to TH-cam and got bombarded with ADS and immediately installed Firefox and brave, and I'm happy with either of those 2.
    I don't think TH-cam gets it, though. If I can't find a way to bypass their ads, I'll bypass youtube altogether.

  • @MrDowntemp0
    @MrDowntemp0 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    Team Librewolf! There's dozens of us!

    • @dj-no
      @dj-no หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      at least 10

    • @mawnkey
      @mawnkey หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      We are legion!*
      * For certain extremely small values of "legion".

    • @user-oj7uc8tw9r
      @user-oj7uc8tw9r หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I found my wolf pack

    • @YouTubdotCub
      @YouTubdotCub หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      a good chunk of us are here in the replies to your comment

    • @Eggroley
      @Eggroley หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The power of one... the power of two... the power of a dozens...

  • @theldraspneumonoultramicro405
    @theldraspneumonoultramicro405 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    ad blockers is vital for security reasons, because many ads on many sites is malware infested and contain harmful spyware cookies which get force downloaded onto your system without ad blockers, blocking ad blockers is essentialy the same as blocking a anti-virus program.

  • @damouze
    @damouze หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Proud Firefox user here, ever since its inception and of Netscape before that and I'm not planning on switching anytime soon.
    Used to crap out of memory and disk space on my DEC Alpha Workstation back in the day getting Firefox built for RedHat Linux 5.2 and 6.0. Ah, good times.
    I tried various browsers over the course of the years, but Firefox remained the one constant in spite of that.

  • @gibbit2k496
    @gibbit2k496 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    They still don't get that the problem isn't the ads most people don't mind some ads, problem is the number of ads is ridiculous to the point you stop watching the content and just watch ads.

    • @toby9999
      @toby9999 7 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      I'm getting ads that are basically scams and I'm being spammed with dog food ads when I don't like dogs.etc. none of the ads are interesting. Just annoying.

  • @BinaryCounter
    @BinaryCounter หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    Typo in the thumbnail ;)

    • @superflame36
      @superflame36 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

      This is your final waring

    • @dakingofcubes
      @dakingofcubes หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I DIDNT KNOW LMFAOOOO

    • @gamersunite9026
      @gamersunite9026 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      waring

    • @Samu2010lolcats
      @Samu2010lolcats หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      the final waring indeed 🤣

    • @BrodieRobertson
      @BrodieRobertson  หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      ​@@Samu2010lolcatsUnintended second meaning lol

  • @Raikos100
    @Raikos100 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    There's too much video in my ads.
    -Google

  • @NuclearFury8
    @NuclearFury8 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    Ads made me not watch youtube on the phone, and maybe they'll make me not watch it on PC if they win the battle.

    • @sulfur2964
      @sulfur2964 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Use revanced extended or just watch it from ice raven or other Firefox fork that supports extensions. Thera other player like pipe but they are pretty meh

    • @realGBx64
      @realGBx64 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You are only costing them money. They would be glad to see you leave.

    • @TheBecke1983
      @TheBecke1983 หลายเดือนก่อน

      firefox with ublock on mobile youtube works

    • @nobodyimportant7804
      @nobodyimportant7804 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      YT will lose as the internet routes around damage. The best case is that YT crashes and burns but is sadly unlikely.
      There is room in this space for a competitor that treats the content creators and users right. TH-cam has seem to have forgotten that they literally have nothing of value without content creators giving them videos to show users. TH-cam creates nothing of value in and of itself.

    • @crestfallensunbro6001
      @crestfallensunbro6001 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      greyjay is a good alternative for mobile

  • @ThatJay283
    @ThatJay283 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    im on Firefox, and there's no way im ever gonna give up on blocking ads. i dont wanna have to sort through 50 different fake "download now" buttons whenever i try to download something from a website. the reason i block ads is because ads are shit, and they're even a massive computer safety risk too. if they weren't shit maybe they wouldn't be blocked so often.

    • @piscinaiv7937
      @piscinaiv7937 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This! they will spend millions to rewrite code to prevent normal users from blocking ads when what they really need to do is police their advertisers better, and close the security holes allowing malware through their ad workflows.

  • @alpacamale2909
    @alpacamale2909 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Why do they think people will do when their adblocker stops working? they think people will say 'well what you gonna do...?'. Are they morons? Once you go AdBlock...

    • @nobodyimportant7804
      @nobodyimportant7804 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, TH-cam is stupid enough to think I will give them a credit card number.
      Instead of giving YT unearned money, I put a measly $20 aside each month and split it 4 ways among the 4 channels I watched the most that month.
      That is not a lot of money but a hell of a lot more than those channels would get if I paid TH-cam's extortion or turned off my blockers. UBO is reporting 117 things that are being blocked on this very page. That is the extent of TH-cam's sleazy behavior.
      30 seconds after typing 117, the items blocked count is at 123.
      🖕TH-cam

    • @ongunkanat
      @ongunkanat หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Actually yes. Most users will say "well, what you gonna do...". That's how the current form of ad-infested internet became the norm.

    • @alpacamale2909
      @alpacamale2909 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ongunkanat not users that got adblockers installed

    • @BrodieRobertson
      @BrodieRobertson  หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      ​@@alpacamale2909 technical users will look for a new solution but just think about how many people watch on mobile and just accept it

    • @minilathemayhem
      @minilathemayhem หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Tbf, there are still numerous people rawdogging the ad-filled internet to this very day, otherwise sites would have abandoned the whole ad model eons ago, which makes the whole trying to kill off of ad extensions absurd to me. Like sure, a fraction of Google's userbase isn't contributing to their ad revenue, but... Seriously, it's such a small percentage that, does it even actually matter? I'd say it doesn't, but the greed of Google knows no bounds.

  • @EvolvedWizard
    @EvolvedWizard หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    As a computer tech, I've used the philosophy of letting people use whatever browser they're most comfortable with. Now I'm gonna get everyone to switch to Firefox.

    • @nathanielbass771
      @nathanielbass771 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      brave tends to be better. Firefox is pulling the same sort of crud youtube does. They haven't gone into extensions yet, but they censor popular news among other issues.

  • @MoonlightFox
    @MoonlightFox หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    I've got high hopes for Ladybird.

    • @redchief94
      @redchief94 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yes! I tried to use it last week but unfortunately its not there quite yet.

    • @NeilHaskins
      @NeilHaskins หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@redchief94 Isn't it still decidedly pre-alpha? I think they're planning for something like full functionality by 2028.

    • @nobodyimportant7804
      @nobodyimportant7804 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Any project with corporate sponsors and/or a governance board will eventually become corrupt.

    • @morxemplum
      @morxemplum หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nobodyimportant7804this is an uninformed take. The Ladybird Initiative only takes unrestricted donations, which means that they’re donations that cannot influence the company and the project has full control of how they get to use those funds. They specifically made a pledge on their website that you cannot buy influence.

    • @andreimiga8101
      @andreimiga8101 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@nobodyimportant7804 And any project without these will fail if it has to compete with corporate backed alternatives

  • @gorak9000
    @gorak9000 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I switched back to Firefox about 6 or 7 years ago now - I could tell Chrome was going downhill, and firefox had their memory eating issues solved. It's been pretty smooth sailing

  • @dltn42
    @dltn42 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    I haven't use Chrome for 3 years. First because of the memory usage at the time... now because privacy.
    This directly controls what I can do on my computer... and Google will increase this.

  • @bendono
    @bendono หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Simply set up network-wide content filtering externally. The easiest and cheapest option is on a Raspberry Pi, but it can also be done on some routers and firewalls or a VM server.

    • @user-oj7uc8tw9r
      @user-oj7uc8tw9r หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is honestly the right approach, but sometimes its unreliable. Ive done this in the past and blocking TH-cam ads almost never worked with pihole unless you spend a bunch of time configuring the filters.

    • @somewhat.random
      @somewhat.random 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You can go "old skool" and set up a custom hosts file using the same lists that a PiHole uses right on your computer. If that happens to be your laptop you are then taking your adblocking with you everywhere you go. It's a "solution" that is almost as old as "ads". Orrr... just start using Brave. Been using it since 2019 with no complaints, and not one TH-cam ad.

  • @juanmacias5922
    @juanmacias5922 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Sounds like having to deal with ads will be a great way for me to go without TH-cam cold turkey lol

    • @VoyivodaFTW1
      @VoyivodaFTW1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have metube running on my server. I see a playlist, I have the playlist. Plus I don’t like having to be online to watch tutorials

    • @juanmacias5922
      @juanmacias5922 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VoyivodaFTW1 hey thanks for sharing, this could be a great workflow for tutorials, like you mentioned.

    • @TheGhostFart
      @TheGhostFart หลายเดือนก่อน

      it's gonna ruin a lot more than just youtube mate

  • @virgo113
    @virgo113 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Remember when Google's motto was "Don't be evil"?
    Yeah... Me neither.

  • @D.G.M.
    @D.G.M. หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Yes, last week I noticed TH-cam were testing embedding ads to the beginning of the videos. There were some weird side effects with the framing and aspect ratio of the ads and the notifications were not always on time at the end. Right now I'm back to getting the old style of ads, but who knows if they will change their mind.

    • @hydra3693
      @hydra3693 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They always do the same A/B testing and then full rollout, it's a cat and mouse game for which they have billions to spend.

    • @janjana3970
      @janjana3970 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think you can skip some ads by going to end of video wait till the end and replay

  • @KayloGL
    @KayloGL หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    High IQ move: Watch every video in MPV with an ad blocking plugin.

    • @rustymustard7798
      @rustymustard7798 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Freetube, and use libredirect to open video links in FT

    • @complexity5545
      @complexity5545 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most regular surfers don't know that and they don't know what MPV is. MPV is what all the video editors and programmers use. Its my main driver since 2005, so I can tap `i` and look at the compression and codecs. I also use a firewall and DNS that blocks all ads. You can use chrome all day on my network and never get hit with an ad. We do this because most viruses and nefarious backdoors come disguised as advertisments and then cloaked as emails. Just block it all, at the NIC packet level.

    • @drawerganizer785
      @drawerganizer785 หลายเดือนก่อน

      MPV can also get the premium bitrate version. ;)

  • @ImperiumLibertas
    @ImperiumLibertas หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Google found the one thing that would make me switch to a different browser. That is impressive! I've been using Chrome for over a decade at this point.

    • @Rexhunterj
      @Rexhunterj หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Thanks for being part of the problem :)

    • @ImperiumLibertas
      @ImperiumLibertas หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@Rexhunterj yeah because going with freedom hating Firefox is any better. What should I be using IE or Safari too? Acting like there's any actual alternatives that are any better.

    • @RadikAlice
      @RadikAlice หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well, in truth they were you using you. Along with all the other Chrome users

    • @JathraDH
      @JathraDH หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Rexhunterj I still use Chrome myself because I finally switched off FF like 15+ years ago when it got so trashy it was unusable. I am simply too lazy to switch back until Chrome becomes so trashy its unusable. When that happens I will find something else.

    • @saki7804
      @saki7804 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@JathraDH you should give Firefox another chance, it got a major upgrade in 2017 and it's actually a really good browser now, completely different from how bad it used to be

  • @slaapliedje
    @slaapliedje หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Back to the Amiga with IBrowse it is! Most of the modern ads don't work on it anyhow!

  • @keyboard_g
    @keyboard_g หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    Firefox, which just added on by default advertising integration and the parent company bought an ad tech company. Browsers are a hellscape.

    • @20NewJourney23
      @20NewJourney23 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I use Brave and am happy with it. It does a great job blocking ads all over the web, keeping my browsing relatively private (as compared to other more used browsers) and has great integrations/features. I love it.

    • @snowthearcticfox1
      @snowthearcticfox1 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      So long as they aren't intrusive I honestly don't mind all that much, assuming they use the funds from that to improve the browser.

    • @Rexhunterj
      @Rexhunterj หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@snowthearcticfox1 Newsflash, they dont use it to improve the browser, they use it to line c-suite executives pockets.
      Thanks for being a fool though and letting the ultra-rich steal from you every day :)

    • @shabadrandhawa3829
      @shabadrandhawa3829 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@snowthearcticfox1i agree, it may actually be good because Mozilla relies a lot of its funding on google

    • @shabadrandhawa3829
      @shabadrandhawa3829 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope it actually turns out good

  • @alzarpomario889
    @alzarpomario889 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Firefox user here, one of the main reasons google can do this is because FF is so bad at handling online video conferencing. The handle of the stream is still a mess and they waste money on stupid features rather than fix feature that the users actually need.

  • @xaracen7207
    @xaracen7207 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    the true way of dealing with this is to boycott ads
    publicly shame the companies BUYING the ads for shoving their worthless crap in your face on your time with your bandwidth. the thing is, EVERYONE needs to do that, simultaneously, endlessly. without remorse.

    • @bartomolev6682
      @bartomolev6682 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Fuck it, preform cyber atacks

    • @xaracen7207
      @xaracen7207 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@bartomolev6682 sadly no, crimes will only make who you oppose feel justified, and it makes you stink to your opponents, look at just stop oil and extinction rebellion, look at how being terrible did terrible things for their misplaced cause.

    • @bartomolev6682
      @bartomolev6682 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@xaracen7207 fair, but there still needs to be some kind of pressure on them. And something to threaten their wallet otherwise they will just ignore us all and continue like nothing happened

  • @TheDoomsdayzoner
    @TheDoomsdayzoner 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    I am not using Chromium browsers, so Google can shove their Manifest V3 where the sun doesn't shine.

  • @docmalitt
    @docmalitt หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Never. I will never watch ads and/or stop ad blocking. Even if I had to download the content and watch it... but no. I lived a good life, if I must watch ads non-stop, I will sail into the sunset... with short-wave radio.I have Firefox and Brave bur tbh I have also noticed something strange going on last 3 days. My sound card blocks the video and I need to restart the laptop - after month and a half of uptime last 3 days were torture. If that is what caused it. Not sure cos I am working on few other hardware projects so... will wait and see another day or two...

    • @20NewJourney23
      @20NewJourney23 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm on Mac using Brave. I've not had those issues you describe. It sounds like a bad internet connection issue tbh. I've had that happen to me when my internet is having issues.

    • @docmalitt
      @docmalitt หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@20NewJourney23 I run PopOS and since changing the graphic card (from hybrid to Nvidia) on my laptop it's much better - just cannot leave it on overnight. Plus am watching YT on Firefox exclusively. Improvement, but not yet solution. At least I don't have to restart my machine every hour - it was that bad. thx

    • @JamesTDG
      @JamesTDG หลายเดือนก่อน

      This sounds pretty familiar

  • @VentiVonOsterreich
    @VentiVonOsterreich 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I had two 15 second unskippable ads before the video played

  • @TheMerauder75
    @TheMerauder75 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Finally made the switch after seeing this video, no joke. I was planning on doing it anyway, but manifest v2 removal really was the last straw for me.

  • @RichHeart89
    @RichHeart89 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    A couple of years ago I decided to just give up on ad blocking completely as I saw the writing on the wall and thought it's gonna be over soon. It has actually taken a lot longer to get where we're going to now than I thought but I'm kinda glad that I'm now pretty much completely unbothered by ads.
    Sure platforms are more aggressive than ever with their targeted ads but many places are much more mindful of how they display ads. Less annoying popups, sneaky redirects or opening ads into new tabs. I don't know how "!adult sites" operate nowadays - I'd assume they're worse - but on the regular safe for work side of the internet life with ads seems more tolerable these days.

  • @memetic_hazard
    @memetic_hazard หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I stayed on Chrome a bit longer when they announced a delay in manifest v3, but a few months back when the deadline was coming up and they didn't announce any further delays, I swapped to Firefox on my desktop. Then I even swapped to Firefox on my phone.
    I still have a Chromebook that I occasionally use with a few dozen Chrome tabs saved up... Guess it's about time to migrate that too.

  • @Sunlight3300
    @Sunlight3300 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The scary part is after chrome killing the manifest v2 most the website will block all user's on Firefox for allowing blocking ads 😭

  • @pinkie723
    @pinkie723 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    What options are there for Chromebook users though? I'm not sure if you even can install anything other then Chrome on a Chromebook?

    • @LordNecron
      @LordNecron หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I think once you went to a Chromebook, you might consider yourself truly lost to mankind.

    • @TheGhostFart
      @TheGhostFart หลายเดือนก่อน

      you dump the chromebook and get a regular laptop, if it's for school/work you're SOL

    • @pinkie723
      @pinkie723 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LordNecron The main reason I got a Chromebook is to natively run Android apps on a laptop (which is nice but admittedly not that useful most of the time). And they're nice light weight laptops if all you need a computer for is using a web browser. Why turn on my expensive gaming computer just to watch TH-cam or Netflix when my Chromebook can do those things just fine with far fewer resources and save my gaming computer from needlessly getting worn out?

    • @JamesTDG
      @JamesTDG หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol, jailbreaking a chromebook is EASY

    • @Alche_mist
      @Alche_mist 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@LordNecron They might be forced. For example, quite a lot of schools use Chromebooks as their "one and only solution".

  • @ZeelofTheMarty
    @ZeelofTheMarty 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I am 34 and I have been using Firefox since I was still a teenager nothing is gone change for me it seems.

  • @HamidKarzai
    @HamidKarzai หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    i always suspected google might do something like this. good thing i never liked chrome enough to switch to it

  • @deadturret4049
    @deadturret4049 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Google has a real competency problem. They're targeting a symptom of their ad block problem instead of actually treating the cause. Most people probably use uBlock and AdBlock primarily because of youtube. Google should instead just add more value to youtube premium. Bring back youtube originals, give premium users app skins, advanced search, etc. All they're doing instead is driving up the need for a real youtube competitor.

    • @garrick3727
      @garrick3727 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I've almost switched to YT Premium several times, but there's no value add. I have YT on my iPhone and I cannot block ads. I don't like the ads but it's not worth the cost of YT Premium to get rid of them. Premium needs something else.

  • @murlock666
    @murlock666 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Pihole at dns level. 800k blocklist. Firefox and UBo at the desktop level.

  • @donkeyking475
    @donkeyking475 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Honestly, if they inject ads into the video stream and I can't skip them...F them YES I CAN. Remember PVRs? Record TV and skip the commercials. I can just download it and skip the ads.

  • @adjusted-bunny
    @adjusted-bunny หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I have been using firefox for quite a while . I used others but I always come back to firefox.

  • @theravenousrabbit3671
    @theravenousrabbit3671 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I would rather not watch youtube, than watch ads. Simple as that.

  • @gobleno
    @gobleno หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I personally used Microsoft Edge until it became clear that they would no long be supporting Manifest v2, at that point I switched to Firefox and only kept Edge around for PWA's and Copilot. Especially on Linux I need a browser that supports PWA's and Firefox doesn't, so I need to keep something else around, so it was nice to hear that they do some form of content blocking by default on Edge.

  • @ominguti6345
    @ominguti6345 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I hate Google as much as the next OS guy, but Firefox is not a Chromium replacement. Firefox is a lot slower especially if you have lots of tabs. Mozilla foundation has dropped the ball decades ago. Chromium is open source. Who is stopping us continuing to use current version of Chromium? Once it truly becomes dated forks can be maintained.

  • @nezu_cc
    @nezu_cc หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Laughs in the ExtensionManifestV2Availability enterprise policy (aka single config file). UBO will still work for over a year ;)

    • @mollthecoder
      @mollthecoder หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for this comment. When I can no longer use adblockers, I will definitely switch to Firefox, but Firefox has some disadvantages that I want to delay having to deal with.

    • @hydra3693
      @hydra3693 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mollthecoder The only "disadvantage" for me is lack of WebHID, which I use only when the planets align. Also some Google sites are accused of intentionally crippling performance on Firefox.

    • @yigitorhan7654
      @yigitorhan7654 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mollthecoder Would you mind telling what those disadvantages are for you? I'm curious about different POVs.

    • @GraveUypo
      @GraveUypo หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yigitorhan7654 probably integration to his workflow. because feature-wise, it really doesn't have any significant disadvantages, and has a few advantages too

    • @HUEHUEUHEPony
      @HUEHUEUHEPony หลายเดือนก่อน

      Firefox extension are nonsense

  • @XhodanXeus
    @XhodanXeus 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    what do you mean stop? how can i stop something that i have never started? iv been using firefox since early releases never had problems or issues. i keep saying use firefox

  • @greyed
    @greyed หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Final Waring? :D

    • @GSBarlev
      @GSBarlev หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Final warring-get your halberds and katanas ready.

  • @enginear663
    @enginear663 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    You forgot to mention Firefoxs development is literally funded by Google so they don't look like a Monopoly.

  • @JamaicaWhiteMan
    @JamaicaWhiteMan หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I've been using Firefox as my main browser since before it was Firefox, with appropriate extensions. Also have Chromium, which I use at times (not for YT). Chrome? Forget about it.

  • @danieltaylor4185
    @danieltaylor4185 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think I speak for a lot of people when I say that my problem is less about ads, and more about tracking. I understand by the nature of TH-cam, there is going to be some level of tracking because it is a service owned by Google. Where I draw the line is when Google has an encyclopedic knowledge of every single website I've browsed, every purchase I've made, and every conversation I've had. This tracking is baked into ads. So, if I don't want the data collected, not seeing ads is just a side-effect.

  • @BPond7
    @BPond7 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    Chrome users in 2024 deserve all the ads.

  • @darkrajin3648
    @darkrajin3648 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I personally swap between three different browsers. I use Google Chrome on my phone to read some light novels. I use Tor plus VPN for some stuff that I like to keep private, and I use firefox mainly on my pc. Although I usually use Chrome on PC purely for paying bills.

  • @Zenless260
    @Zenless260 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    SOLUTION: RUMBLE

  • @SamuTheFrog
    @SamuTheFrog หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Switched to firefox about 6 months ago & it was such a freeing experience.
    It's actually kinda crazy how firefox was my original browser, and then switched to chrome, and now ive gone full circle and ended up back on firefox.

  • @The_WJC
    @The_WJC หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    *Sighs in Firefox*

  • @diffdimgamerseven9986
    @diffdimgamerseven9986 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Just say no.
    Corporations are not allowed to shove ads on your face without your consent (this is a meme btw)

    • @diffdimgamerseven9986
      @diffdimgamerseven9986 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@NoOne-sk2ve i have specifically said that this is a meme and is not to be taken seriously /lh

  • @xperience-evolution
    @xperience-evolution หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I trust in Brave

  • @apIthletIcc
    @apIthletIcc 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    What's crazy is we get ads absolutely rocketed up the ass, and then 90 percent of said ads are just tik Tok and temu ..
    Seems like something ain't right about that 🤔

  • @sush7117
    @sush7117 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    adblocking doesn't have to be done in a browser. Any firewall/DNS-proxy with blacklist will get the job done. Yes, it's harder to set up but it is what it is

    • @lordhighbinary2006
      @lordhighbinary2006 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Those don't affect TH-cam ads, or similar video streaming ads.
      Source:
      I run both DNS blocker, https pixel server, still need browser ad blocking for everything else.

    • @Galileocrafter
      @Galileocrafter หลายเดือนก่อน

      while true, this doesn't stop TH-cam-Ads. On device blocking, where you can access the page directly, is and will be better every time.

    • @snap_oversteer
      @snap_oversteer หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Except you can't do element blocking with DNS filtering

    • @arcaegecengiz
      @arcaegecengiz หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not really... those cannot inject code into webpages (or at least HTTPS pages) so they cannot block ads that aren't hosted on a separate ad server, for example youtube ads are served from youtube servers so they can't be blocked without blocking the entirety of youtube. I guess some MITM proxy setup with custom ssl certificates installed on the system could maybe work but there isn't any software that I know of that can do that

    • @lordhighbinary2006
      @lordhighbinary2006 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@arcaegecengiz Actually, just finished reading about how somebody did just that: setting up a proxy system to basically filter out the traffic and adjust it in real-time to remove the video ads.
      Granted CPU computation was a bit heavy though, nothing terrible, but forget using it on your wifi router.

  • @nostalgicumbry3279
    @nostalgicumbry3279 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    One day TH-cam is goin to make it so content creators will have to manually put the ads in their videos in order to upload a video and find a way that that specific part CANNOT be skipped without youtube red

  • @sprinklednights
    @sprinklednights หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    NPCs be like: Hmmm no.

  • @FreerunMediaService
    @FreerunMediaService 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The only way to remove the large amount of commercials is getting paid for it. So when you get ads on the website you see, they need to pay up. It's your data that is used an targeted.

  • @rog2224
    @rog2224 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Google was slowly driving me away from Chrome by actively making the UI worse and worse for months - this is the final straw. When it breaks uBlock Origin, I'm downloading my passwords and migrating my bookmarks to Firefox (I've already set up the addons/extensions in FF with the correct version, or a close equivalent) Took me less than 20 minutes.

  • @jwhite5008
    @jwhite5008 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    A lot of websites pleaded to disable adblocker there. I did only to reenable it in less then a day, every time.
    Most ads I've seen (while adblock is disabled) are mental abuse promoting dishonesty or scam.
    Either veto the ads to be at least 1000 times more honest, or I consider whoever wants me to disable adblock a criminal.
    Actually don't bother, the only thing I do from the ads is remember to avoid the advertised product and look for alternatives. If something needs to be advertised then it's probably worse then the alternatives and has to compensate.
    Advertisements were supposed to inform people of offers they are unaware of but could be beneficial to them. Instead *all* of the ads now are brainwashing, and none of the really good or useful things ever appears on the ads. People need to invent a different mechanism for product awareness - ads don't do it anymore.

  • @eivisch
    @eivisch หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    wowowo

    • @SuperMewio
      @SuperMewio หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I like how google translates this to wow

    • @eivisch
      @eivisch หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SuperMewio :D

  • @micahnightwolf
    @micahnightwolf 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Longtime firefox user here. I actually switched from firefox to chrome back in like 2015 because back then I had a weedy little AMD A10 and firefox was eating it all, and Chrome wasn't. Now I've been back on firefox for both desktop and android for about 3 years, running uBO and about to set up a pi-hole. I also use Louis Rossmann's certain app named after a color and a bird to watch youtube on android, and it lets me do all the YT Premium stuff for free and better than if I'd paid for Premium.

  • @michaell.8748
    @michaell.8748 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    1 views 9 likes bro has fallen up

    • @MaoRatto
      @MaoRatto หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bro must go into the trash.

  • @Sodisna
    @Sodisna 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    'Boil the frog" So, what Apple does with older generations of iPhones.