www.FlyingTV.org - Learn all about Gyroplanes as we get an up close and personal tour from an RAF Dealer in Florida. Check out www.Flyingtv.org for more!!!
I used to fly Bensen like gyroplane....for several years...due to lack of time...I stop and sold my machine...At the time (back in the 95 or so...) Raf people did no used stabilizer...they claimed that their rotor post...had some flexibility...and therefore they did not require stabilizer...Now...in this video I saw that they are using one....interesting changes in posture. Personally, I love the stabilizer...under rough wind...I kept my altitude with little adjustment at the stick.
I don't like the trim buttons looking exactly like and in close proximity to the push-to-talk button on the stick. Seems like a good way to be messing up your trim. But, just something you would get accustomed to, I suppose. Also, why not specific oriented slide switches for trim control on the sides of the grip handle? - Left/right, fore/aft, then just one PTT button on top. Ah, what do I know? I'd still buy one.
big dicussions about a very big RC Calidus atm..just did my training in a modified tall tail 2000...which is great..but the rep on the rAF is not all that funky...
Trim, in a gyro, is to minimize pilot work, the full movement of the rotor head is achieved by hand, using the stick! No biggie if the trim stop working!
Corey McGee - The pilot flies and lands normally. In the UK, part of the training involves landing with both a failed and a runaway trim. It just requires a little more force on the stick, that's all. It's nowhere near as dramatic as an MCAS failure. We're even taught to be able to land without a rudder (using the throttle to adjust the yaw).
مقطع يستحق اﻻعجاب والمشاهده ..والسبب هو اﻻبداع الﻻ متناهي الذي يتمتعون به ..وكيف انهم يصنعون شئ من ﻻشئ
I used to fly Bensen like gyroplane....for several years...due to lack of time...I stop and sold my machine...At the time (back in the 95 or so...) Raf people did no used stabilizer...they claimed that their rotor post...had some flexibility...and therefore they did not require stabilizer...Now...in this video I saw that they are using one....interesting changes in posture. Personally, I love the stabilizer...under rough wind...I kept my altitude with little adjustment at the stick.
I don't like the trim buttons looking exactly like and in close proximity to the push-to-talk button on the stick. Seems like a good way to be messing up your trim. But, just something you would get accustomed to, I suppose. Also, why not specific oriented slide switches for trim control on the sides of the grip handle? - Left/right, fore/aft, then just one PTT button on top. Ah, what do I know? I'd still buy one.
I like it very good
No, but you need a much longer runway if you don't use it.
i think I am very privilegedged to be trained by one of te most experieneced in AU, in a modified tall tail..but very cautious too about its rep...
big dicussions about a very big RC Calidus atm..just did my training in a modified tall tail 2000...which is great..but the rep on the rAF is not all that funky...
RC Giro's Make Perfect Camera Mounts,
no horizontal stabilizer is a killing machine.
No lack of training lots of training is the key
the stabilizer is on the post that supports the rotor
@@Thebasicmaker this is worthless
What if the electronic trim fails?
Trim, in a gyro, is to minimize pilot work, the full movement of the rotor head is achieved by hand, using the stick! No biggie if the trim stop working!
Corey McGee - The pilot flies and lands normally. In the UK, part of the training involves landing with both a failed and a runaway trim. It just requires a little more force on the stick, that's all. It's nowhere near as dramatic as an MCAS failure.
We're even taught to be able to land without a rudder (using the throttle to adjust the yaw).
do the trim uses a spring or a kind of screw driving a piston up and down?