@@mcelec7603 but what if they shoot something in 24 fps but at the editing time, they think it should be part of montage and it should be slo-mo, do they use Topaz to convert it to 60 or 120 fps? b/c to me, it seems flawless. But not sure about Hollywood if they embrace this software for such work.
@@milanjani Yes, such a situation as you wrote can happen, and since AI-based solutions have been used in Hollywood for some time, I would not think that the studios would be averse to the "industrial" version of Topáz. And this video was made with a much earlier version of Topáz, which has improved a lot since then (unfortunately, it also became much more expensive 🙁).
Mind blown 🤯 how smooth and natural it looks
that's really cool, it looks very natural.
Indeed. Its awesome. Do they use in professional hollywood projects?
I guess if they know in advance that a slow-motion recording is needed, they record it with a higher FPS.
@@mcelec7603 but what if they shoot something in 24 fps but at the editing time, they think it should be part of montage and it should be slo-mo, do they use Topaz to convert it to 60 or 120 fps? b/c to me, it seems flawless. But not sure about Hollywood if they embrace this software for such work.
@@milanjani Yes, such a situation as you wrote can happen, and since AI-based solutions have been used in Hollywood for some time, I would not think that the studios would be averse to the "industrial" version of Topáz. And this video was made with a much earlier version of Topáz, which has improved a lot since then (unfortunately, it also became much more expensive 🙁).