1st Amendment Auditor, Cody Highroller, Gets Arrested.....AGAIN!!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- *Fair Use
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Fair Use Definition
Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test.
Cody: Can I plead the 5th?
Everyone Else: Please! For the love of god, do it!
How long it would last? I'd guess 2,3s at best.
It never ceases to amaze me that somebody will film themself commiting a crime, publish it and then deny that it happened.
it's all for YT MONEY. Why the cop even bothered to reason with the bumb is useless. It's also our fault for watching these stupid videos.
omg this public sidewalk bs from these idiot public sidewalk so these idiot is on a public sidewalk so what is a public sidewalk supposed to be a safe zone or something where the police can not detain you or arrest you
L
L
0p0pppp
And then sue the government for 50-billion-trillion-gazillion dollars because he thinks that is a thing.
It's honestly terrifying. The truth is he's trying to impress his friends who also live in a reality of their own creation. It's a real slippery slope when the facts don't matter.
"I have the right to remain silent" Yeah, but not the ability.
Ron White's lawyer is on line two..
And also, he doesn't have the right to remain silent, that's after you're under arrest, but you're still required to ID yourself.
@@tanker335 Ron is one of the greatest standup comics of all time.
@@steakknives One ALWAYS has the right to remain silent there's no only if under arrest clause in the constitution. But the Supreme court has disagreed and ruled on this matter “1. A municipal ordinance that makes it unlawful to interrupt a police officer in the performance of his duty is substantially overbroad and therefore invalid on its face under the First Amendment.”
“...the ordinance in question is not limited to such expressions but broadly applies to speech that "in any manner . . . interrupt[s] any policeman" and thereby impermissibly infringes the constitutionally protected freedom of individuals verbally [482 U.S. 451, 452] “
“3. Although the preservation of liberty depends in part upon the maintenance of social order, the First Amendment requires that officers and municipalities respond with restraint in the face of verbal challenges to police action, since a certain amount of expressive disorder is inevitable in a society committed to individual freedom and must be protected if that freedom would survive.” Pp. 471-472.
HOUSTON v. HILL, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) No. 86-243
That is absolutely interfering a police investigation. Definitely laws against that. (Pubic hairs on his face!!! 😂😅 omg, ROFFLES). He’s trying this in TEXAS. Good luck.
This cop really, really doesn't want to do the paperwork required to process this fool's arrest.
NONE of them seem to wanna do their job, in that regards.. honestly, if u ask me, i think the cognitive test for 1 to b able to "represent THEMSELVES" in court, really SHOULD hold ppl to HIGHER standards..
Wtf are you ppl blabbing about? Do you know anything about report writing? Their job in general. Can’t stand ignorant comments when you ppl are so clueless. 🤦🏻♀️
Cops get tired of arresting these fools, doing all the paperwork etc and then the DA dismisses the charges ...exercise in futility.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@annebelgard6723 I think that's the real issue. Cops recognize the danger these people pose but to a DA it's just another low level charge that costs more to prosecute than it's worth. As a result these guys get ideas that they're somehow being let off because the arrest was bad or something like that, just like how sovcits get the notion that their nonsense works when a cop doesn't show up for traffic court and the charge gets dismissed. When the system fails, criminals begin to think they can win. On the flip side, Cody has enough of a record that they might actually start taking notice of him.
Arrest these instigators every time and let the court system sort it out; eventually, many of the charges will stick, and off to jail they go.
The issue is the courts are not willing to waste there time dealing with it, which just impowers them to do it over and over again!
Why rule what's already been ruled??? I think the Supreme court has disagreed and ruled. “1. A municipal ordinance that makes it unlawful to interrupt a police officer in the performance of his duty is substantially overbroad and therefore invalid on its face under the First Amendment.”
“...the ordinance in question is not limited to such expressions but broadly applies to speech that "in any manner . . . interrupt[s] any policeman" and thereby impermissibly infringes the constitutionally protected freedom of individuals verbally [482 U.S. 451, 452] “
“3. Although the preservation of liberty depends in part upon the maintenance of social order, the First Amendment requires that officers and municipalities respond with restraint in the face of verbal challenges to police action, since a certain amount of expressive disorder is inevitable in a society committed to individual freedom and must be protected if that freedom would survive.” Pp. 471-472.
HOUSTON v. HILL, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) No. 86-243
Walking up to the traffic stop to berate the officer is the physical act.
Well gee if you're gonna bring out the big logic guns. 😂
@@kristinrad 😂😂😂💯
Apparently this is really hard concept for frauditors to figure out.
I’d take that as threatening behavior towards a cop.
But are they committing a crime??? I think the Supreme court has disagreed and ruled. “1. A municipal ordinance that makes it unlawful to interrupt a police officer in the performance of his duty is substantially overbroad and therefore invalid on its face under the First Amendment.”
“...the ordinance in question is not limited to such expressions but broadly applies to speech that "in any manner . . . interrupt[s] any policeman" and thereby impermissibly infringes the constitutionally protected freedom of individuals verbally [482 U.S. 451, 452] “
“3. Although the preservation of liberty depends in part upon the maintenance of social order, the First Amendment requires that officers and municipalities respond with restraint in the face of verbal challenges to police action, since a certain amount of expressive disorder is inevitable in a society committed to individual freedom and must be protected if that freedom would survive.” Pp. 471-472.
HOUSTON v. HILL, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) No. 86-243
SHEER HARASSMENT PERIOD.
Borderline terrorism IMO.
💯%
Totally agree. Domestic terrorism
Police need to realize how detrimental these scumbags are to society and stop being patient with them and arrest them as soon as they fail to comply.
I think they know. They just don't want to do the hours of paperwork, which will end with the person walking out of custody virtually always within minutes of completing the process; then having to show up to court for a case that the DA is most likely going to want to dismiss.
As much as I despise these goofs, none of this is against the law. He’ll end up with a pay check from this.
@@bretharley7480 Spoken like a true lenslicker.
@@bretharley7480 Your comment shows you have ZERO clue of the law lol. You MUST be a Trump supporter lol.
@@bretharley7480
A lot of this is against the law.
"interference is a physical act"
Standing on a sidewalk is a physical act. Yelling is a physical act. Existing is a physical act.
Once again frauditors prove that there is no expectation of intelligence while they are in public.
You mean, he hasn’t won that billion dollar lawsuit yet? 😂😂😂
An unemployed former busboy is now a law scholar. Like Chillie.
Everyone trying to catch them "Chili charges" now
Mutual combat? Once gut shot and he is going to taco bell his pants. Come on Cody, do better.
Naw.. he can sweep the leg lol
It's obvious he wants material. He has been quiet because no one will engage with him.
The misconception about interference only being a physical act is one of my biggest pet peeves with these guys. Every time I hear it I roll my eyes. Like it takes 5 minutes to do some research and you would know you are wrong 🤦♀️
It's simpler than that...interrupting is interrupting. How many adults have failed to learn that?
Actually, there is a difference in different State Laws in how they are written. Some include specific language that does include “physical” interference, while other States don’t include that language.
If they had a loudspeaker and are shouting when an officer is talking to someone being questioned then that is obvious interference. The act of vocalising is a physical thing unless they can work out how to make noise by some Star Trek type mind thing.
@@Yorksbloke huh.. that’s a fantastic way of putting it. I hadn’t thought to put it into those words but you are so right.
But is it???I think the Supreme court has disagreed and ruled. “1. A municipal ordinance that makes it unlawful to interrupt a police officer in the performance of his duty is substantially overbroad and therefore invalid on its face under the First Amendment.”
“...the ordinance in question is not limited to such expressions but broadly applies to speech that "in any manner . . . interrupt[s] any policeman" and thereby impermissibly infringes the constitutionally protected freedom of individuals verbally [482 U.S. 451, 452] “
“3. Although the preservation of liberty depends in part upon the maintenance of social order, the First Amendment requires that officers and municipalities respond with restraint in the face of verbal challenges to police action, since a certain amount of expressive disorder is inevitable in a society committed to individual freedom and must be protected if that freedom would survive.” Pp. 471-472.
HOUSTON v. HILL, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) No. 86-243
Yes! Finally! These agitators need to be held accountable for interfering, harassment and disorderly conduct.
What does the court say??? I think the Supreme court has disagreed and ruled. “1. A municipal ordinance that makes it unlawful to interrupt a police officer in the performance of his duty is substantially overbroad and therefore invalid on its face under the First Amendment.”
“...the ordinance in question is not limited to such expressions but broadly applies to speech that "in any manner . . . interrupt[s] any policeman" and thereby impermissibly infringes the constitutionally protected freedom of individuals verbally [482 U.S. 451, 452] “
“3. Although the preservation of liberty depends in part upon the maintenance of social order, the First Amendment requires that officers and municipalities respond with restraint in the face of verbal challenges to police action, since a certain amount of expressive disorder is inevitable in a society committed to individual freedom and must be protected if that freedom would survive.” Pp. 471-472.
HOUSTON v. HILL, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) No. 86-243
@@user-fw6eg3hc8fneed a tissue?
I would ask him maybe 2 or 3 times for a name, then just book him in as John Doe.
Yes, I presume the cop did not want to do the paperwork after an arrest.
Maybe you should study the actual law first. US Supreme Court case 36 yrs ago LOL “1. A municipal ordinance that makes it unlawful to interrupt a police officer in the performance of his duty is substantially overbroad and therefore invalid on its face under the First Amendment.”
“...the ordinance in question is not limited to such expressions but broadly applies to speech that "in any manner . . . interrupt[s] any policeman" and thereby impermissibly infringes the constitutionally protected freedom of individuals verbally [482 U.S. 451, 452] “
“3. Although the preservation of liberty depends in part upon the maintenance of social order, the First Amendment requires that officers and municipalities respond with restraint in the face of verbal challenges to police action, since a certain amount of expressive disorder is inevitable in a society committed to individual freedom and must be protected if that freedom would survive.” Pp. 471-472.
HOUSTON v. HILL, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) No. 86-243
@@user-fw6eg3hc8f LOL!!!! Wrong
@@rickreallylikedthevideobut7899 Supreme Court rulings say you're wrong...I'm gonna agree with them and the hundreds of years of caselaw
Cody lowroller arrested And in other news water is wet
Interesting, this tough guy goes from f bombs to "sir" the more he realizes he's in deep trouble.
This is not a first amendment behaviour
It’s verbal
Abuse and obstruction
Harrassment, threatening law enforcement, charge him with them all
I guess he thinks if he gets arrested he will get new followers
Love when they say I got evidence on my camera
Yes evidence against yourself
Maybe your clueless opinion...but the US Supreme Court said different “1. A municipal ordinance that makes it unlawful to interrupt a police officer in the performance of his duty is substantially overbroad and therefore invalid on its face under the First Amendment.”
“...the ordinance in question is not limited to such expressions but broadly applies to speech that "in any manner . . . interrupt[s] any policeman" and thereby impermissibly infringes the constitutionally protected freedom of individuals verbally [482 U.S. 451, 452] “
“3. Although the preservation of liberty depends in part upon the maintenance of social order, the First Amendment requires that officers and municipalities respond with restraint in the face of verbal challenges to police action, since a certain amount of expressive disorder is inevitable in a society committed to individual freedom and must be protected if that freedom would survive.” Pp. 471-472.
HOUSTON v. HILL, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) No. 86-243
The cop let the “Yuh-huh!” “Nuh-uh!” “Yuh-huh!” part of the conversation go on way too long. There’s no point in trying to get a frauditor to agree with anything. Ask three times, then cuff and stuff.
LEOs should not have to put up with this kind of behavior. Arrest all these freaks!
Unfortunately courts protect the freedom of speech in my country this frauditor after the first 5 seconds her be looking for his TEETH a d .most probably grow up eating soups
When you start copping riffs from Glenn Cerio, you have no where to go but down.
Please do not take this long to arrest other criminals so why do they take so long with these worthless individuals?
As a retired police officer back in my day we would have just arrested him and not played his game.
Yep, you probably did and got a Supreme Court ruling “1. A municipal ordinance that makes it unlawful to interrupt a police officer in the performance of his duty is substantially overbroad and therefore invalid on its face under the First Amendment.”
“...the ordinance in question is not limited to such expressions but broadly applies to speech that "in any manner . . . interrupt[s] any policeman" and thereby impermissibly infringes the constitutionally protected freedom of individuals verbally [482 U.S. 451, 452] “
“3. Although the preservation of liberty depends in part upon the maintenance of social order, the First Amendment requires that officers and municipalities respond with restraint in the face of verbal challenges to police action, since a certain amount of expressive disorder is inevitable in a society committed to individual freedom and must be protected if that freedom would survive.” Pp. 471-472.
HOUSTON v. HILL, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) No. 86-243
@S hey Jojo, that case had to do with verbally abusing cops, not with interfering with them. Big difference.
You'll have to excuse our little wanna be frauditor friend here. He's used to dumb frauditors who actually listen to him. He comes on here and we always completely destroy him because he's just not smart enough to fool us.
@@edvincent He walked up and talked to em...and it's protected...same situation. He didn't interfere he TALKED to the officer
@S nice try dummy. Did mommy not teach you how to read? There are ZERO Supreme Court decisions that validate a third party person from interfering with a police investigation. Just to clarify, zero mean none, nothing, not there, does not exists. Is that enough clarification for you Jojo?
And if the courts do not back this officer up on this then there's something really wrong with the courts and it's just giving these POS a license to do what ever they want to!
Watch out officer! He might sweep your leg!
He has probably been busy working on that $500 million law suit.
They need to stop babying these folks and just arrest them
They spend WWWAAAYYYY too much time arguing with these guys. Round and round and round...Slap the cuffs on him and be done with it.
He folded on giving his name so what are the odds he will fold on his date of birth. As soon as he sees the cuffs come out.😂😂😂 love the cops reply as soon as you opened your mouth 😂😂
He'll be folded over in jail too.
When I went to the zoo as a kid I challenged every lion and tiger I saw to a fight. Unless the cage door looked a little iffy. That's when I moved on to the otters. They didn't want none of this. That's a cop watcher in a nutshell.
"Pubic hair mustache." LOL!
He reminds me of Jimmy, the "challenged" character on South Park. Especially with the 1985 Michael Jackson brand gas station sun glasses.
Cody Lowroller has difficulty with multi-syllable words.
Well rounded, emotionally stable adults do not talk to other people like this.
Cody has the "well-rounded" part covered but, as for the rest . . . . . .
Cody sounds pretty buzzed. Like drinking steady since noon buzzed.
Makes you wonder if "anal licks" was a drunken mumble or a freudian slip or both
Cody: Arrested for what ailments?
Cop: under your mouth opening up!
A physical act, ironically!
😂😂😂
How non-existent must Cody's self-esteem be that he feels the need to treat others that way? Walk up to a total stranger that has nothing to do with you and start being abusive like this.
Oh and when he asks "Can I remain silent?" I'm shocked the officer didn't answer "I really doubt it, sir."
You actually do turn this into comedy and make it watchable. If you have kids they are so lucky to have a dad with such a great sense of humor!
That’s so sweet of you to say. It means a lot.
@@dummykruger I agree, the world needs more sarcastic people out there to make fun of tye stupid people.
I bet he won't talk to someone like that in a bar because he would have his butt kick...
Good grief!!!! That opening line was gross. I love when these disgusting people get arrested
Good video, I hope you cover DMA's traffic stop that happened today.
They can mindlessly repeat their misinformation that they learned from the internet, but they cannot use the same internet to learn the actual statute and the elements of the crime that they thoughtfully film to prove their offense.
Brilliant!
You’ve got a good point right there!! 🤔👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Or did he read a Supreme court ruling. “1. A municipal ordinance that makes it unlawful to interrupt a police officer in the performance of his duty is substantially overbroad and therefore invalid on its face under the First Amendment.”
“...the ordinance in question is not limited to such expressions but broadly applies to speech that "in any manner . . . interrupt[s] any policeman" and thereby impermissibly infringes the constitutionally protected freedom of individuals verbally [482 U.S. 451, 452] “
“3. Although the preservation of liberty depends in part upon the maintenance of social order, the First Amendment requires that officers and municipalities respond with restraint in the face of verbal challenges to police action, since a certain amount of expressive disorder is inevitable in a society committed to individual freedom and must be protected if that freedom would survive.” Pp. 471-472.
HOUSTON v. HILL, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) No. 86-243
The village called they lost their idiot oh wait we found him 😂😂
Just to add to your excellent research, Texas defines "criminal negligence" under Section 6.03 as: "A person acts with criminal negligence, or is criminally negligent, with respect to circumstances surrounding his conduct or the result of his conduct when he ought to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur." Since anyone with any sense would know that yelling at a cop during a traffic stop was interfering, I think Cody Lintroller needs to go back to TH-cam college of law. Entertaining as always D.K..
6:25 Another case supporting why it is so important for all recording devices be confiscated as evidence when dealing with frauditors and sovcits
My favorite content creator (and Tones Overthinks It is also).
Something is very wrong when hard-working cops have to put up with this.
Every time a frauditurd gets arrested an angel gets his wings
After 41 years LEO please stop arguing with these people. He interfered with this cop. Took his attention away from the T/S and someone could have been hurt. Just cuff and stuff him. He can tell it to a Judge. Another great video DK as always your the best.
You probably made the US Supreme Court case 36 yrs ago LOL “1. A municipal ordinance that makes it unlawful to interrupt a police officer in the performance of his duty is substantially overbroad and therefore invalid on its face under the First Amendment.”
“...the ordinance in question is not limited to such expressions but broadly applies to speech that "in any manner . . . interrupt[s] any policeman" and thereby impermissibly infringes the constitutionally protected freedom of individuals verbally [482 U.S. 451, 452] “
“3. Although the preservation of liberty depends in part upon the maintenance of social order, the First Amendment requires that officers and municipalities respond with restraint in the face of verbal challenges to police action, since a certain amount of expressive disorder is inevitable in a society committed to individual freedom and must be protected if that freedom would survive.” Pp. 471-472.
HOUSTON v. HILL, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) No. 86-243
Who is we? You're by yourself. Lol
So how is going up to a cop and harassing him during a traffic stop standing up for our constitutional rights? Oh yeah it's not. This fool deserved to get arrested. Great video!
That's about 3 hours from me. Might need to go visit this dude and bug him during an "audit".
The 1970s called, and asked if Cody D*cksplatt could return the haircut! And what's worse, his village then called and said they had moved!!
Police need to realize scumbags are to society and arrest him immediately when they refused to comply
DK stole it right outta my mouth: I'm thinking Cody Low Prospects' funds are getting down and he can't afford another hotel room. BUT if he gets arrested and some of that sweet sweet ebegging money, maybe he can splurge. Hence, idiot maneuver.
Great content. Cody Warden is a ginger Glen Cerio.
Cody Warden of Ft. Worth has some interesting court cases against him
Damn, but it'd be soooooo funny if when dimtwat here first steps up to that car and starts speaking, the cop just whips out his taser and puts him flat on the ground!!!
Let’s see, according to this guy, the statute of limitations is, let’s see, uh, INSTANTLY. The MOMENT a crime is over then he can’t be arrested for the crime. “Officer, I am NOT robbing the bank.” “But you were.” “But the robbery is over NOW, officer!” “But it wasn’t when you were robbing the bank!” “I have it on camera, the bank robbery was over!” “I have YOU on camera robbing the bank.” “But the bank robbery is over now, officer!” Sure, this works.
Chille tried that when he was being arrested..
That had to be the most ridiculous “holding the police accountable “ video I’ve seen in two years of watching this nonsense.
Just arrest him already!
This is the Cody Low Roller tutorial on how to get arrested.
I don't know how it works in the US, but where I live, the law is presumed to be known. You, as a police officer, don't have to explain the law to somebody.
Hilarious as per usual.
Oh, and you were funny too.😉😉
I give this cop a solid D-. He let this drag out way tooooooooooo long. I'm sure his intentions was to avoid an arrest, but it only made matters worse.
Glenn Cerio...Texas version.
They always say about cops needing to deescalate but he was coming in hot. Who is he to say for the police to leave. The cops are the one thing keeping him from being beaten up for harassing people
Free speech lets us know who the idiots are. Regularly.
You can't use the 1st Amendment to justify this behavior.
Auditors do all the time.
Lumpy really does remind me of that guy on Leave it to Beaver.
Oh, man, he's almost crossed the line from hilarious/creepy to sad/creepy.
Almost.
: D 😉😄😄😄
I think Cody's achieved "end of the roader" status on the frauditor venn chart. Unfortunately 😥
@@kenjohnston1257 That's really funny! Thanks for replying.
: ) 👍 👍 ☺
Has he been drinking or is he just this rude with slured speech??.
Yes, just yes
Let me take a shot here…..Cody’s parents are related
DK, you’re lucky that my doctor gave me new pain meds today to *TRY AND KEEP* me from going into the hospital(I have Sickle Cell Anemia and Asthmas), but you’re literally making me about to go because I can’t stop laughing at your sassyness with this video lol. I absolutely love you buddy. Thank you so much for bringing a smile to my face while I’m in such horrible pain!
Hope you feel better soon, brother.
@@ruserious9577 Thank you so much friend. Right now the extra pain meds are helping, but I have a sneaky feeling that, in the next 2-3 days, I’ll have to go ahead and bite the bullet and go into the hospital, but at least I’d be at my 2nd home lol.
I hope you’re doing okay right now!
@@rationallyruby Thank you. I’m actually in the hospital at this very time😅. But I’m starting to finally feel better. So thank you for the well wishes, they’re extremely appreciated.
Now that's a threat so they can arrest him
Just take him to jail already. Punk.
The officer clearly waited until the stop was over to deal with his BS!
So?
Also, you can take his phone for evidence of the crime of interfering, disorderly conduct. Use THEIR own tactics on THEM! ENOUGH!!!
Interference is something that is in your way. If the sound of your sister's band practicing keeps you from getting your homework done, that’s interference. According to the vocabulary website.
Is it funny how he's not getting in this car and not getting the hell out of there
Many of these frauditors are criminals who have been sent to prison for truly heinous crimes. Some are sex offenders, others for assault and battery, armed robbery, child neglect, and much, much more. Yet, these criminals are the ones claiming they're standing up for my Rights?
At last! I've been waiting to hear that. These lowlifes are poorly educated, filthy, and hate authority. They are unemployable because they have criminal records.
Cody Highroller - just another criminal who is worthless. He blames everyone else except himself for his actions. What he did here was blatantly stupid so he would be arrested.
Why do officers always argue so long with these idiots. Ask, Warn/order, arrest (spicy sauce or 50K V as needed). Personally, I was rooting for the 50K to see if it would curl his facial pubic hair.
It's stunning how completely oblivious these folks are to their self-incriminating videos. They record, yet have a specific pre-set narrative that over-rides everything from common sense, to their own fricken recordings
Why aren't the cops being schooled in this ? Don't debate with them , that's what they want to stretch out the video for money from YT. Ask the basic questions ( driving license or whatever three times ) and then arrest them if not produced. In this case, as I see it, if the officer had told him to back off because he was interfering with the traffic=stop, then he could have arrested him immediately after the stopped car drove away, instead of the five minute plus to-and -fro. Poor management by the old cop.
I really am surprised that officers who have so many years of service allow themselves to be sucked in.
Dummy Kruger, I think you're my favorite narrator. I never laugh as hard at any frauditor videos than I do at yours! 😂🤣
Omg Cody is the new Glenn
Jesus Christ loud law enforcement just started arresting these guys if they don't comply with in 2 d*** minutes this doing the Billy Preston thing of going around in circles has got to stop😊
in ANY real country, it would be haardous to your health to talk to ANYONE like this.
Yes!!!! Beautiful arrest...😅
First of all no police officer should never let a frauditor take control of the conversation they keep asking the same questions over and over and over again even when they get the answer they circle back to the first question that they asked like they didn't get the answer stop playing verbal volleyball with these frauditors I'm not a lawyer or a police officer but when your voice gets in between two other people's voices that's interfering now that you're interfering you can be asked for identification because now interfering becomes a crime now if you're asked for identification and do not produce it that's crime🤠
Glenn Cerio's cousin
I can hear all of us sane people saying arrest him, arrest him 😂😂😂😂
You know what I don’t understand? The video quality. Are they live-streaming or just using literal potatoes?
Gotta love how he thought that he can just go onto a traffic stop and take over.
If he has even a penny of income from TH-cam, that income form he sent to the court saying he has no earnings means he’s committed an offence doesn’t it?
As so many other people mentioned how can someone one acting like a lunatic screaming and yelling at an officer distracting them from there duty just trying to deal with a simple traffic stop not be considered interfering!