If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, you'll have a lens that can get Bigfoot's eyelashes in focus, but his horns will be out. This guy made some epic footage with the BMPCC OG and donated his cage and Nikon speedbooster to me. Thanks buddy! Let's all go subscribe to him! www.youtube.com/@djmatt1/videos Meike 25mm f0.95 For M4/3 amzn.to/3CcBCDJ For Fuji amzn.to/3Nf01Pp For Sony amzn.to/43pCJMw For Canon RF amzn.to/3MVOgvM For Canon M amzn.to/43snzGg For Nikon amzn.to/43EuUCe meikeglobal.com/products/meike-25mm-f0-95-aps-c-manual-large-aperture-camera-lens-e-x-z-mft-efm-rf-mount?_pos=4&_sid=42f7e598c&_ss=r Instagram instagram.com/vegetablepolice/ All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice Topaz Video AI for enhancing and slowing down footage! www.topazlabs.com/topaz-video-ai/ref/1640/
Voightlander 0.95 lenses man. Sharp enough wide open, buttery smooth focus, 3d pop, and colors that make a grown man wet the bed. The 17.5mm was glued to my gh2 and g7 99% of 7 years.
Guaranteed he knows this already, he just had to try the bad lenses first lol. He even mentions the gh6, which he should've never have gotten rid of and he should put the Voigtlanders on.
When working with super shallow depth of field you have to remember that the focus plane is a curve, not a straight line. If you want to use a tree to the side to get focus point your camera at the tree, get focus, then point it beside the tree where you're going to be standing.
Or, and here's a crazy suggestion, he could just put his hat on a stick at around 5 feet high where he is going to stand, and focus on that. Then, pull the stick out, stand where the stick was and put his hat back on. Or is that too easy?
When I was completely new to camera aperture terminology, and knew nothing about bokeh or depth of field, I stumbled on your channel. The term toneh confused the hell out of me. I googled it and realized about the Northrop connection.
it widely used terminology around the globe, i was once in a small camera store shop in Saudia arabia, and a very youngish teenager boy was asking the clerk if he got any of the chinese cheap lens for the l mount with big toneh! that's when i know it's not just a word for us Kasey's hobos
That was great entertainment and classic CC stuff! As for the lens, it's pretty sh*t, right? That ghosting was an incredible feat of optical engineering! The colour shift was just bizarre! If it's any consolation, when you did the ultra close-up at the end, the mic foam seemed to be reasonably in focus! 😂
i got the OG when it first came out, and i hated it at first. everything i shot looked like trash. then i learned it's like a musical instrument. it just takes practice. a huge amount of practice. i still shoot with it in that it's my "throw in the bag and go out and shoot" camera because getting a better sensor than that Fairchild is a tall order, and with all that practice your shots will get better. Also check out the Lumix 12-35mm, it has stabilization and works really well with the super 16mm sensor size. Put a black mist filter on with a variable ND and you are pretty well good to go with the OG in any setting.
@Ocean Perpetual mostly keeping the tiny little body stable. That tiny sensor just amplifies movement (the crop factor). getting a stabilized lens does help greatly, but just being aware of your own movements goes a long way. The OG is also a great camera to fly on a gimbal. But just getting comfortable with dealing with the crop factor and composition, being further away than you might typically be. In terms of exposure it's tricky too because you do get 12 bits to play with, so I generally tend to go with a bit underexposed so i can push the highlights around (which that's the thing you really need to get used to, the Fairchild sensor on this camera has a roll off quality that makes it so buttery and smooth so you just have to get accustomed to not exposing to the right)
1:07 - NOOOOOOOOOoooooo, do NOT power accessories from the same source as the camera! There is no voltage spike protection on BMPC, you won't get a 2nd chance (yes it might be fine for a long time, but it takes only ONE spike to brick it!) - my beloved camera is DEAD because of it. Brilliant content as always 😜
"I feel like I'm a filmmaker, but I have none of the actual skills of a filmmaker. So every shot I take is out of focus, misaligned, top heavy, overblown, underblown, I suck at life." 25 shorts and 5 features under my belt and I still feel this way every project and pretty much every shot. Filmmaking is impossible😞
When Franklin Lightningbush introduces himself, you know you’re in for a good cinematic video from the woods. “You must be at least this tall to use this lens.” It’s interesting the fans of Cinematic Toneh seem to have left the cinema when Citizen Kane was on screen, with its astonishing depth of field to show everything near to far in focus.
I got rid of my 7Artisans lens because it had that really wild curvature where there's like a big bubble of what's in focus. Most of what's in the middle is in focus but nothing else in the same like... Distance is because curvature of the lens. If it was close I wouldn't have returned it, it was wild how far things were from the focus in the middle. It looks just like that happened in a lot of these shots.
Dreamy! But if you want crispy at 0.95, you will pay dearly for it. The Sony 50mm 1.2 GM may be your full-frame huckleberry. It's the mirrorless king of fast lenses. But oh, you WILL pay for a place at THAT table. And I draw the line at Noctilux 0.95 madness. That's just insanely expensive.
A lot of hard work, but sadly, to so little good result. Time to give BM the heave-ho. The Fletch-like making up of names in the bloopers was the best part of the video.
It's actually "popping" when there is little blur. The ability to 3D discriminate (particularly when the localized tonal contrast isn't very broad, say from the 40% to 60% printer when view in print terms) when the viewed area is actually all in focus. Such lenses exist.And you answered your own question...."it's cheap" at f0.95 and 10K g...the goal is selling "baity" gear, not making "the cinema"
@@editingsecrets In print, shading is only achieved in inks buy printing 100% of the ink in a lesser percentage of the area. Inks only print all or nothing. If you do this on a fine screening of the 100% area this is the "halftone-ing" process. ALL ink printers print this way with the exception of gravure. In offset lithography (my career) it is done on screening densities of 133 lines per inch (US common for job printing) to 300 lpi. In a perfect world a shade of 50% printer under a magnifier would be a perfect checkerboard of ink and blank paper. As you shade to 40% printer and beyond you haver ink dots on a blank background, to 60% and beyond the background is solid ink and the voids in the background blank paper. Creating fine subtleties in the 40-60% regions (especially in the four-color process (Black Cyan Magenta, and Yellow) to simulate full color in high end print requires knowing where within the process your distortions are going to occur. It's easy to be "OK", very hard to be spot on and in some cases the shortcomings of the CMYK color space makes it impossible. Because of this, since I had roughly 35 years thinking in these terms, when evaluating my lenses, it's by evaluating their ability to hold those subtle gradations at least to screen and that screen needs to be like a ViewSonic VP2785-4K to work in ProPhoto for the most truth in what you are seeing, looking at things channel by channel to evaluate. It surprised me just how obvious the differences in lenses were when compared that way. Or, you could do like I do on a lot of stuff and just use the smallest lens I have for the task and don't pay any attention to the chaos. But if it's something I want to print, I spend the time.
Companies make M43 F/0.95 lenses for one reason: people will buy them. Never mind that the focal plane is thinner than a sheet of paper and almost nothing you want in focus actually will be. It's all about the Toneh! Right?
I think I won the manufacturer lottery with my f/T0.95 25mm slr magic. not too dreamy wide open but sharp at f1.1. Fun little lens but I'd rather use the Olympus 25mm f1.2 for ease of use lol
This is why the BMPCC4K with the Speed Booster and the Sigma 18-35 is so popular, or the Sigma FP since it’s full frame. The OG is a cool camera to play with, but you have to throw a lot of money at it, and it’s still a pain in the ass to use.
5:06 look`s nice. Close ups aren't bad. But the further away you are, the aperture should be closed to f2.8 or more. And it's definitely not a run & gun setup. Too much weight, too slow for action. I have a great 0.95 lens - 7artisans 35mm, it`s my recommendation. It doesn't have a pronounced 3d pop, but it's sharp and usable at 0.95. I'm really happy with it.
Looks like the same deal as a 7artisans 35mm 1.2 lens I had a while ago... Nice to have ultra wide aperture but it's irrelevant when the image quality is unusably soft and shitty.
Dang, i had just decided screw cinema! Gonna buy camrecorder, small, nice zoom, easy to use, good enough video quality... but now i got urgent need to get M4/3 and some shitty vintage lenses and curse my life and YOU!!! aaaaarrrrgggh...
Hi Casey, any thoughts on the new Fijifilm X-S20? I pre ordered it, but always enjoy hearing your entertaining point of view cause you give a strong opinion. At the very least would be entertaining to see a video of your take.
Ummm so we are judging this lens’ sharpness while it has a budget variable ND filter attached? Sorry but even single strength NDs are going to rob some sharpness even under the best of best of circumstances, let alone a vari-ND with a f0.95 lens
lol... ohhh you poor poor m43 loser.. ; ) i always look forward to your videos,, you always keep things fun.., f .95 .... sounds fast until you realize its f 2.7 ff... hahaha,, those m43 tricksters.., im surprised you went with this lens.. why not use some 16mm lenses... get a C mount or PL mount adapter.. i still have my Rex 4 Bolex from college days.., would be fun to get one of these BMPCCs and slap a Kern Switar lens on there.. , i remember when the OG BM came out,, i wanted it so bad..,, now that i could get one for like $500,, im like, 'eh' ... my Z Cam S6 is a dream camera.. that tech would have cost me like $40,000 in 2011.. cameras are the one technology im grateful for.. I've considered the Meike S35 lenses.. solid looking build quality.. im just not crazy about modern lenses,, & im just on a Contax Zeiss kick for now.., eventually id like a couple Meike or DZO cine primes, finally got my Sony ZV-E1 last week.. (so i can do lil casual stuff with good autofocus.., Adorama sent me a used camera! no bs.. i sent it back for exchange... smh,
this hurts seeing you use a tripod. I almost unsubbed. But I have a CC t shirt that has, through many washes, stopped down to toneh 0 and I will stay subbed. EDIT. Stopped up. I should be banned for not saying it right.
I kinda hope you got a bad copy of the lens. Mushy and soft wide open, horrific color shift from 0.95 to 2.8 and what I saw in the 2.8 footage was the worst color noise artifacts I've ever seen on digital footage. (in the tree bark) I'm unsure if that's the camera or this lens, but you're definitely pushing the OG BM pocket well beyond its capabilities.
I have no idea what happened in that shot lol. I've pushed shadows a lot harder and they never fell apart like that. Also I think the colour shift is BMPCC OG's fault. It's happened on a few lenses.
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, you'll have a lens that can get Bigfoot's eyelashes in focus, but his horns will be out.
This guy made some epic footage with the BMPCC OG and donated his cage and Nikon speedbooster to me. Thanks buddy! Let's all go subscribe to him! www.youtube.com/@djmatt1/videos
Meike 25mm f0.95 For M4/3 amzn.to/3CcBCDJ
For Fuji amzn.to/3Nf01Pp
For Sony amzn.to/43pCJMw
For Canon RF amzn.to/3MVOgvM
For Canon M amzn.to/43snzGg
For Nikon amzn.to/43EuUCe
meikeglobal.com/products/meike-25mm-f0-95-aps-c-manual-large-aperture-camera-lens-e-x-z-mft-efm-rf-mount?_pos=4&_sid=42f7e598c&_ss=r
Instagram instagram.com/vegetablepolice/
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
Topaz Video AI for enhancing and slowing down footage! www.topazlabs.com/topaz-video-ai/ref/1640/
I will grab one for my GH6 camera, Thanks !
I think you should sell a Camera Conspiracies t-shirt which has “Am I in focus?” printed on it. Maybe using a slightly blurred font.
Maybe
Only comes in Black(Magic).
Voightlander 0.95 lenses man. Sharp enough wide open, buttery smooth focus, 3d pop, and colors that make a grown man wet the bed. The 17.5mm was glued to my gh2 and g7 99% of 7 years.
Guaranteed he knows this already, he just had to try the bad lenses first lol. He even mentions the gh6, which he should've never have gotten rid of and he should put the Voigtlanders on.
When working with super shallow depth of field you have to remember that the focus plane is a curve, not a straight line. If you want to use a tree to the side to get focus point your camera at the tree, get focus, then point it beside the tree where you're going to be standing.
Physics is overrated.
Or, and here's a crazy suggestion, he could just put his hat on a stick at around 5 feet high where he is going to stand, and focus on that. Then, pull the stick out, stand where the stick was and put his hat back on. Or is that too easy?
@@MrJules39 Carrying a long stick around with you everywhere, or finding a long stick each time sounds like a pain in the ass.
@@Bradum Maybe that's what Bootney was trying to do with the sawed-off stick
It really has a 70s cinema look to it. Love it!
I like that you color graded this with an actual apple. 1 core, no threads, just seeds. You know, the fruit.
Love it. Toneh.
WE NEED MORE BMPCC VIDEOS NOW.
When I was completely new to camera aperture terminology, and knew nothing about bokeh or depth of field, I stumbled on your channel. The term toneh confused the hell out of me. I googled it and realized about the Northrop connection.
it widely used terminology around the globe, i was once in a small camera store shop in Saudia arabia, and a very youngish teenager boy was asking the clerk if he got any of the chinese cheap lens for the l mount with big toneh! that's when i know it's not just a word for us Kasey's hobos
That was great entertainment and classic CC stuff! As for the lens, it's pretty sh*t, right? That ghosting was an incredible feat of optical engineering! The colour shift was just bizarre! If it's any consolation, when you did the ultra close-up at the end, the mic foam seemed to be reasonably in focus! 😂
i got the OG when it first came out, and i hated it at first. everything i shot looked like trash. then i learned it's like a musical instrument. it just takes practice. a huge amount of practice. i still shoot with it in that it's my "throw in the bag and go out and shoot" camera because getting a better sensor than that Fairchild is a tall order, and with all that practice your shots will get better. Also check out the Lumix 12-35mm, it has stabilization and works really well with the super 16mm sensor size. Put a black mist filter on with a variable ND and you are pretty well good to go with the OG in any setting.
@Ocean Perpetual mostly keeping the tiny little body stable. That tiny sensor just amplifies movement (the crop factor). getting a stabilized lens does help greatly, but just being aware of your own movements goes a long way. The OG is also a great camera to fly on a gimbal. But just getting comfortable with dealing with the crop factor and composition, being further away than you might typically be. In terms of exposure it's tricky too because you do get 12 bits to play with, so I generally tend to go with a bit underexposed so i can push the highlights around (which that's the thing you really need to get used to, the Fairchild sensor on this camera has a roll off quality that makes it so buttery and smooth so you just have to get accustomed to not exposing to the right)
1:07 - NOOOOOOOOOoooooo, do NOT power accessories from the same source as the camera! There is no voltage spike protection on BMPC, you won't get a 2nd chance (yes it might be fine for a long time, but it takes only ONE spike to brick it!) - my beloved camera is DEAD because of it.
Brilliant content as always 😜
"...in the hands of a professional..." LOL! That blue light looks cool when it shines through the back of your chair....
"I feel like I'm a filmmaker, but I have none of the actual skills of a filmmaker. So every shot I take is out of focus, misaligned, top heavy, overblown, underblown, I suck at life."
25 shorts and 5 features under my belt and I still feel this way every project and pretty much every shot. Filmmaking is impossible😞
Now you have the right idea. It’s not about the perfect camera but the perfect camera collection!
When Franklin Lightningbush introduces himself, you know you’re in for a good cinematic video from the woods.
“You must be at least this tall to use this lens.”
It’s interesting the fans of Cinematic Toneh seem to have left the cinema when Citizen Kane was on screen, with its astonishing depth of field to show everything near to far in focus.
Love the inclusion of bloopers!
I may be the first to suggest that a cocoon would be the name of a hybrid coyote racoon.
the toneh is weired
I got rid of my 7Artisans lens because it had that really wild curvature where there's like a big bubble of what's in focus. Most of what's in the middle is in focus but nothing else in the same like... Distance is because curvature of the lens. If it was close I wouldn't have returned it, it was wild how far things were from the focus in the middle.
It looks just like that happened in a lot of these shots.
The GH6 is missed.
I have a 16mm T2 version of this lens. The cinema truly IS, ours!
The best footage was with the FDX-3000. As usual. But you all knew that.
Great videos, always. Thank you.
I wish you had someone recording you setting this tripod up to get these shots in the forest😂. That setup is HEFTYYYYYY 😂
I come for the strange names and stay for the toneh
"What did Bootnee talk about today?" "I dunno man, the video just went by a blur."
Dreamy! But if you want crispy at 0.95, you will pay dearly for it. The Sony 50mm 1.2 GM may be your full-frame huckleberry. It's the mirrorless king of fast lenses. But oh, you WILL pay for a place at THAT table. And I draw the line at Noctilux 0.95 madness. That's just insanely expensive.
I was searching for what other lens might be suitable and saw that voigtlander makes a 10.5mm f0.95. Might be wide enough.
your work satisfies like no other
Gonna be hard to beat "Bootknee Bucklepump" as a codeword for those who watch CC vids until the bitter end.
A lot of hard work, but sadly, to so little good result. Time to give BM the heave-ho. The Fletch-like making up of names in the bloopers was the best part of the video.
Friggin hell, give him time to figure out how to use that damn thing haha
Starting to wonder
If its too picky or what.
Have ya found your
Perfect Rig or still longing
For the Elusive
Purple Widget?
They refuse to Make
This rig with this lens should be called mushroom world simulator on the bushes
A Vision Quest that doens't necessarily have to be in focus to be shamanistic.
Miriam Webster dictionary enhancement: "Underblown". Wuahaha! 100 (focal) points!!!
Tony would be proud
Lighting is the way my friend
after that you will find heaven with that baby❤
"Franklin Lightningbush"???? That's my grandfather's name!!!
Is becoming a film-maker the natural progression after years of vlogging?
Either way, great video Mr Lightningbush!
Just as all great musicians wind up playing jazz, all great vloggers turn into cinematic woodlands filmmakers.
Lightning counterpunch.. 😂😂😂😂
Magical.
I would buy this lens only if i'm only doing a photo challenge or something like that...Thanks for sharing!
What do you think of my setup: A7siii, Tamron 17-28, black pro mist, in a small rig cage, and a jolby tripod. Do you think the cinema can be mine?
Not with that tripod
coming soon: Soap Opera Conspiracies
It's a good video but I think it establishes that the OG is a dead end.
This video is ace.
Are u using peaking? Also, grab a it cut filter to put on your lens. Next, shoot cinema dng.
It's actually "popping" when there is little blur. The ability to 3D discriminate (particularly when the localized tonal contrast isn't very broad, say from the 40% to 60% printer when view in print terms) when the viewed area is actually all in focus. Such lenses exist.And you answered your own question...."it's cheap" at f0.95 and 10K g...the goal is selling "baity" gear, not making "the cinema"
"say from the 40% to 60% printer when view in print terms" Could you explain this please?
@@editingsecrets In print, shading is only achieved in inks buy printing 100% of the ink in a lesser percentage of the area. Inks only print all or nothing. If you do this on a fine screening of the 100% area this is the "halftone-ing" process. ALL ink printers print this way with the exception of gravure. In offset lithography (my career) it is done on screening densities of 133 lines per inch (US common for job printing) to 300 lpi. In a perfect world a shade of 50% printer under a magnifier would be a perfect checkerboard of ink and blank paper. As you shade to 40% printer and beyond you haver ink dots on a blank background, to 60% and beyond the background is solid ink and the voids in the background blank paper. Creating fine subtleties in the 40-60% regions (especially in the four-color process (Black Cyan Magenta, and Yellow) to simulate full color in high end print requires knowing where within the process your distortions are going to occur. It's easy to be "OK", very hard to be spot on and in some cases the shortcomings of the CMYK color space makes it impossible. Because of this, since I had roughly 35 years thinking in these terms, when evaluating my lenses, it's by evaluating their ability to hold those subtle gradations at least to screen and that screen needs to be like a ViewSonic VP2785-4K to work in ProPhoto for the most truth in what you are seeing, looking at things channel by channel to evaluate. It surprised me just how obvious the differences in lenses were when compared that way. Or, you could do like I do on a lot of stuff and just use the smallest lens I have for the task and don't pay any attention to the chaos. But if it's something I want to print, I spend the time.
Good day, Mr Lightningbush.
The Olympus 17mm f/1.2 would be a better fit in that it's actually sharp at f/1.2.
I promise you, get a .58x speed booster and a Zeiss distagons 35mm f2 and see all the 3dimensional pop. Even when shooting flat.
I've already tried that th-cam.com/video/onC80yyeM3s/w-d-xo.html The f1.4 version.
It was a fox, it thought you were a chicken!
Hey…Which monitor do you use/recommend for BMPCC OG?
Companies make M43 F/0.95 lenses for one reason: people will buy them. Never mind that the focal plane is thinner than a sheet of paper and almost nothing you want in focus actually will be. It's all about the Toneh! Right?
I think I won the manufacturer lottery with my f/T0.95 25mm slr magic. not too dreamy wide open but sharp at f1.1. Fun little lens but I'd rather use the Olympus 25mm f1.2 for ease of use lol
But I could also just use the S5 with a cheap 50mm and that just woks.. but film is usually between f4 and f8 full frame, so...
This is why the BMPCC4K with the Speed Booster and the Sigma 18-35 is so popular, or the Sigma FP since it’s full frame. The OG is a cool camera to play with, but you have to throw a lot of money at it, and it’s still a pain in the ass to use.
What you think of Blackmagic pocket cinéma caméra 4k? I can't decide if i should get the OG or the 4k🤔
I would probably get the 4k just for the 120 fps.
@@cameraconspiracies ahhh! Ok cool thanks man and really enjoying your channel 💪😊
@@cameraconspiracies he recently got the 4k just to return it hauhauhauhauhauhauhauhau
Clackety clack of the viaduct
surprised to see meike's offered such a large aperture lens for the BMD
The background looks like mucus.
Love the setup! I want it!
5:06 look`s nice. Close ups aren't bad. But the further away you are, the aperture should be closed to f2.8 or more.
And it's definitely not a run & gun setup. Too much weight, too slow for action.
I have a great 0.95 lens - 7artisans 35mm, it`s my recommendation.
It doesn't have a pronounced 3d pop, but it's sharp and usable at 0.95. I'm really happy with it.
"I like a clicky one..." That's what *SHE* said....
I think Markus would tell you to concentrate on you lighting, for 3D pop.
Looks like the same deal as a 7artisans 35mm 1.2 lens I had a while ago... Nice to have ultra wide aperture but it's irrelevant when the image quality is unusably soft and shitty.
I have the 0.95 (for x mount) and it's not very soft or shitty wide open.
Isn't Meike based in China? So wouldn't it be closer to "May-kay"? Or is there some history of them beginning elsewhere?
looks like recorded through ikea 35cl glass
Dang, i had just decided screw cinema! Gonna buy camrecorder, small, nice zoom, easy to use, good enough video quality... but now i got urgent need to get M4/3 and some shitty vintage lenses and curse my life and YOU!!! aaaaarrrrgggh...
I think the american version of this is 29mm f0.8 due to the unit conversion.
Wow, this is somehow worse than my new Samsung S23.
That takes talent.
It's ok man no one's perfect 🤗
The background is horizontal ghosting instead of background Toneh. Strange.
Im out of the loop, is there a TH-cam explaining the bmpcc fascination now?
Kasey is a trend creator , never a follower !
Just go back a couple of weeks and he explains it.
@@editingsecrets thank you
You need to upgrade to the BMPCC 4K, then you'll be on to something proper.
bro the pop is insane and the focus is so clear
Nice!
69
Thanks ,now my eyes hurt
The toneh looks like it has Vaseline on it.
Sorry - think you may have lost your way a bit on this. It just likes what it is - kind of 1inch sensor look.
C i n e m a t i c
Amazing episode 😂❤
Bought one Meike lens and then my dog died. Never again.
Hi Casey, any thoughts on the new Fijifilm X-S20? I pre ordered it, but always enjoy hearing your entertaining point of view cause you give a strong opinion. At the very least would be entertaining to see a video of your take.
He talked about it briefly but it's obviously going to be a banger camera. Idk who else is offering that whole feature set at that price.
He said he loves it and Fuji is the best.
@@inhalants somehow I missed the mention. Do you have the time he mentioned it? I am waiting for a month and a half for the darned camera to arrive :(
Why the hell would you want a phot sensor cinema camera?
Ummm so we are judging this lens’ sharpness while it has a budget variable ND filter attached? Sorry but even single strength NDs are going to rob some sharpness even under the best of best of circumstances, let alone a vari-ND with a f0.95 lens
Freewell make good ND's. Good luck using an f0.95 without an ND. This is how it would be used in the real world.
The toneh looked so gross lmao.
This lens has green screen pop.
Only 2d pop.
Film lenses are usually not as sharp as photo lenses, that's on purpose :)
Stopping by to keep commenting: All this to not buy a Sigma fp 😂😂😂😂😂
lol... ohhh you poor poor m43 loser.. ; ) i always look forward to your videos,, you always keep things fun.., f .95 .... sounds fast until you realize its f 2.7 ff... hahaha,, those m43 tricksters..,
im surprised you went with this lens.. why not use some 16mm lenses... get a C mount or PL mount adapter.. i still have my Rex 4 Bolex from college days.., would be fun to get one of these BMPCCs and slap a Kern Switar lens on there.. , i remember when the OG BM came out,, i wanted it so bad..,, now that i could get one for like $500,, im like, 'eh' ... my Z Cam S6 is a dream camera.. that tech would have cost me like $40,000 in 2011.. cameras are the one technology im grateful for.. I've considered the Meike S35 lenses.. solid looking build quality.. im just not crazy about modern lenses,, & im just on a Contax Zeiss kick for now.., eventually id like a couple Meike or DZO cine primes, finally got my Sony ZV-E1 last week.. (so i can do lil casual stuff with good autofocus.., Adorama sent me a used camera! no bs.. i sent it back for exchange... smh,
this hurts seeing you use a tripod. I almost unsubbed. But I have a CC t shirt that has, through many washes, stopped down to toneh 0 and I will stay subbed.
EDIT. Stopped up. I should be banned for not saying it right.
WTH was that
I've been watching you older long hair vids. You know, the ones where you sound like an American skater kid. Was that on purpose?
3d pop is reserved for those of us that believe the planet is a spherical shaped 3 dimensional ball... Flat earth = flat cinema
This lens is unusable imho.
it's very bad lol
It's basically a clickbait turned into a lens.
I kinda hope you got a bad copy of the lens. Mushy and soft wide open, horrific color shift from 0.95 to 2.8 and what I saw in the 2.8 footage was the worst color noise artifacts I've ever seen on digital footage. (in the tree bark) I'm unsure if that's the camera or this lens, but you're definitely pushing the OG BM pocket well beyond its capabilities.
I have no idea what happened in that shot lol. I've pushed shadows a lot harder and they never fell apart like that. Also I think the colour shift is BMPCC OG's fault. It's happened on a few lenses.
so much pop you look like you shot this at home on a green screen.....
hire a camera men
the toneh is horrible lmao
maybe your eyes are not in focus. try squinting
Why does the image like trash? My Canon M50 produces a better image.
Super soft and super heavy… it’s like a high fiber diet… am I banned yet?