He actually has a pretty good track record, but his cases tend to go before a jury (by choice). Besides I’d rather have a lawyer like this rather than one that just plays ball with the judge & prosecutor & just goes with whatever they dec. If he’s wanting to recuse this judge, he most likely has a damn good reason.
That's not actually what they're fighting over here. The issue is that the law requires her to stay the proceedings until a ruling on her recusal has been issued. But instead of doing that she is requiring all parties involved to show up to court every day as if the trial is going to commence, wait around for hours until she decides they're not getting a ruling on the recusal motion that day, and then rinsing and repeating every day. So everyone involved in this case has been wasting hours every day for almost two weeks standing around the courtroom when they all know that the recusal motion hasn't been ruled on and that the case is not proceeding.
@@Rowgue51 Correct. That said, whether or not to hold proceedings (even for a status conference) seems to fall within "judicial" acts (albeit without jurisdiction) rather than "administrative" acts therefore, even if she is wrong to hold further proceedings, she would have absolute immunity from any consequences. On the other hand, if the court is truly acting without lawful authority by lacking jurisdiction, the parties have no legal duty to show up for any proceedings. The parties COULD choose that option if they are confident they are correct on the legal issue BUT (the classic big "but") that choice would likely not be without undesirable consequences. PS I, personally, interrupted a court proceeding (municipal court in my small city) because I thought it lacked jurisdiction and was immediately put in jail for 2 hours and issued a judgment of contempt of court against me. I still think I was correct on the law but the three judge appeal panel thought otherwise - although one of those judges issued a dissent to say that, in their opinion, the contempt of court should have been reversed because the process for issuing a contempt of court judgment was not properly followed. I may have a "contempt of court" conviction on my record, but no proceedings have been held by that municipal court ever since that day, over 8 years later (7/10/2015).
@busterellis7188 nope..wrong again sparky...Aileen Cannon Florida Judge...appointed to the federal bench with 4 trials under her belt and no federal cases ever. SHE'S UNQUALIFIED
@@ShapesWithoutColors no bail, life in prison, and contempt of court 90 days contempt must be followed consecutively with life in prison. That's my order take him away bailiff
This judge is a example of whats wrong with the "justice" system. She believes she is beyond being questioned by anyone that she deems to be below her. Ego!
It’s not just ego she literally is sat above everybody else in the room and everybody has to rise when she enters or leaves… she was placed in a position of power in a cult… How do you expect her to act?
@@zippymax1 men have hormone imbalances as well, don’t throw that crap out as women cannot do a superb job, she is screwing up just as male judges screw with their huge hormonal egos. So drop that BS.
Nah. Every profession has people like the judge. She is one of those that gets everyone else to do her job for her. Under the guise of collaboration. I'm extremely in favor of team collaboration but when every task you have requires said "collaboration" you're really just pawning your work off onto others. But with a judge I would much rather she ask for assistance than make a decision when she isn't aware of the law.
Every qualified immunity case ever follows that standard, and I've been pushing to just arrest all involved for years instead of making a law to cover for something the judiciary made up to usurp another law.
and now you know why she's trying to roll the case - it will cost the defendant his own time and lawyer fees. The DUI guy knows it and that's why he's upset. It's clear she has it out for Larry and the DUI guy is using the law to prevent it from happening. Other lawyers would bow down
@@juneslugg2 lawyers generally have a flat fee. If they are retained you pay by the hour when get guidance. At least that’s been my experience in speaking with multiple attorneys. And also living with 2.
Not always true i was billed 300 an hour for a 10 months of court with my ex for custody and child support. Crazy expensive but not as expensive as what she was trying to get out of me.
In this video Judge Hurley who uses a very empathic neutral tone of voice told the lawyer to be more professional..."Court Cam: Judge John Hurley SCOLDS LAWYER For Lack of Professionalism" I actually like the fact that when this male judge says opinion he says it repetitively but with a normal voice. I think this female judge probably just needs to change the tone of voice.... Because some people take it as offensive speech. Maybe people enjoy more neutrality of mind don't like it if judges or lawyers don't use neutrality of mind and voice. But it seems people in comments don't use neutrality as well, they are often judgmental rude for various reasons but say that judge can not do it, or lawyer can not do it or teacher can not do it or officer can not do it... no matter the gender or nongender or whatever.
Disgusting corrupt judge. She interrupted him a hundred times and plays a victim card saying she allowed him to speak, where she has literally told him "I'm gonna cut you off here", and proceeded to keep interrupting him. Horrible judge.
This woman is an emotional and egotistical, showing almost ZERO objectivity in this situation. I an only project this is how she rules on her cases, which may be a massive miscarriage of justice.
That's not what I was seeing. He was being aggressive probably in a effort to goad her into saying somthing that he could use to show bias. He knew what he was doing. She was just reacting to that.
They want the accused to keep having to repeatedly come back, day after day, racking up attorney fees. So corrupt. And her editorial critical comments are completely outside any reasonable standard of behavior for a judge. Get her off that 'bench'!
Maybe, but she's still the judge and she had every right to call out the lawyer talking over her. This stands regardless if the lawyer is wrong or 100% correct with his claim.
She repeatedly interrupted Mr. Forman whilst he was speaking, not allowing him to make a record, then claims she allowed him to speak. She is an unprofessional judge, if not corrupt.
@@zappyeats2579 faaacts and its disrspectful u have to respect her and her court ot goes both ways its almost like your parent yall may not agree and they maybe wrong u still have to respect them so PUT SOME DAMN RESPECT ON THAT JUDGE!!!!!!
@@deedee_31 I believe maybe you might have misconstrued my post. I believe Larry was very respectful of her. He was simply advocating for his client. Also there is also something else going on that attorney/client privilege maybe won't allow him to share. But there is definitely a reason she is being asked to be recused from the case. It tells me it must be serious if he told his client to stand by and not even come into court.
Judge: "What question do you have for me?" Attorney: "You have no legal jurisdiction to continue. Period." Judge: "Let me be the judge of that." *Insanity.*
The judge actually said 'Let the chief justice be the judge of that.' The Chief Justice has not yet decided. The defence attorney is insisting that she should be treating this as if the Chief Justice had decided against her. Do you not see the problem with the position the defence attorney is taking?
@@MissionaryInMexico Say for the moment, someone makes an accusation against the state bar, including all judges and prosecutors generally, in response to having been arrested. Regardless of the fact there is almost certainly no merit to that accusation, they simply get to walk? It does not work that way. She is only staying the proceeding. Now I do agree that she should likely not schedule the proverbial next hearing until after there is an answer, but other than that, she is not actually hearing the case at the moment.
@@snowbird2893 Which means she also cannot simply dismiss the case. Staying the proceedings is the judicial equivalent of doing nothing. Now should some other judge have been sitting in her place? Quite plausibly, however, if she can't do anything, she could not make that decision either, could she?
Assuming he has money for appeal, a judge improperly failing to recuse herself is the best thing that can happen, because it provides grounds for overturning a conviction if things don't go well for the client.
@@egcoon2750 when a judge takes him/herself off a case because they have at least a perceived conflict of interest with one of the parties involved on the case.
This doesn't apply to judges only. For instance a city council member would recuse from voting on a motion if there is a conflict of interest. Pretty much anytime there is a conflict of interest a person should recuse themselves from a situation.
Judge should be disbarred. She’s literally saying I don’t care about the law or jurisdiction it’s my court room I’ll do what I want. I hope the people of this county/city can see how this judge acts towards defendants
Every time a judge allows qualified immunity to end a case is basically the same thing. At some point many generations from now we might actually start arresting people for it.
There is so much ego tripping and power tripping in every level of law enforcement! End qualified immunity now and implement more measures to have accountability and transparency!
It takes courage to go after a judge like this. This lawyer was within the law and good for him to challenge unlawful orders, even if they come from a judge. You sir are a stand up guy who happens to be a great lawyer. 👍
This is an example of someone who cannot interpret and understand words. Even though the law is clear and unambiguous she states "what people have told me is. . .",showing she can't interpret clearly written words. That's a great example of unintelligent people rising through a system.
Judge Hurley is a great judge, he is loved by many for his genuine attitude.... he was also accusing an attorney of running the court his way, it's in one of the videos..... and told him that many others had a similar problem with him. that the court is run by the judge and not by the attorney, and that he was asked before to change attitude but he never did, and he asked him to finally change the attitude....he wanted to say his rulings whether the suspect will stay in jail or not and the attorney was pushing his own agenda, but the attorney was not pushing it so hard, he was actually quiet most of the time...didn't push it so hard as Mr. Forman did in these videos...But I understand that Dui's cases are different than the cases of Judge Hurley who ahs a real offender.....It seems some courts are mostly run by the judges as Hurley who speak the rulings 95 percent of the time, but he is also very empathic and doesn't want to punish the addicts too much, or too less,..But it's confusing when the judge has the right to speak and when not.. if Judge Hurley explained to the attorney how disprespectful his behavior is, for running the court his way and expecting his agenda to make rulings for his clients. The attorney only said I need only this and this and the judge replied ok we will write it down and take care of the request...or something like that. It seems Judge Hurley&y likes to have things done quickly therefore he doesn't like it when someone is trying to run it differently in different timing. Maybe the timing of the speech was the biggest problem because then the judge could not focus on the papers that he was reading and studying.. so he loved things in his own tempo and timing...So maybe this lady is not a bad person, maybe she likes to have some orders...and I guess if she will know Mr. Forman better, she will understand his type of work more and better....In some videos the female lawyer was annoying but the female judge was annoyed by her attitude and interruptions but she as the judge was very decent to her, she tried to be fair..and told her in a polite manner to do it the right way...and explained to her that she wants to be fair to both sides... in the end, she said I have to today many other cases you have to give me some break, I didn't have lunch yet etc.
@@alaalfa8839 Sentences and paragraphs are your friend. They might make your messages readable. Massive blocks of text are your enemy. I wanted to read it, but became annoyed by the writing style.
It is so concerning to see a judge behave this way! To belittle an attorney who is clearly making a valid point for her to follow the law, this is so concerning of this judge on so many levels!!! These are the judges we do not need! Clearly she feels she is powerful, everyone else is beneath her, and she doesn't like to be rightfully called out when she is clearly wrong! To belittle an attorney like that, yet she's the one who began interrupting him! Sadly, this attorney is in front of her a lot. Makes you wonder how he could be mistreated in front of her on his next case. I would file a grievance!
How can you set a case for trial when you haven't established jurisdcition....The Court has no power to move forward - what is so difficult for this judge to understand?
This Judge is out of control . Her cop like EGO and disrespect for the Court rules and law she should be turned over to the State Bar . If I was an attorney there is no way and am letting this Judge get away with her kind of treatment and disregard for the law .
She's unwilling to follow the law as written and yet her frustration is with him continuing to tell her what the law is. This judge really needs to either be brought up to the bar, or have her self-educated.
@@sublimehypocrisy. Actually, there wasn’t even a need of a hyphen. My pet peeve is the overuse of the words and subsequent watering down of their meanings. Words such as ‘genius’, ‘GOAT’, and ‘legend/legendary’ for example. Or the redundant use of the word ‘literally’!
Wow! Her ego is insane. She is projecting super hard. She is the one that can’t help being snarky and it’s clear that she keeps interrupting him because she knows he’s right and doesn’t want to admit she’s wrong. These are not the people that should be judges in our courts.
I lost it when she said "I let you speak without interrupting, why won't you do the same?" She literally interrupted him several times to tell him to hurry up
@@shiftyswifty325 No it neither touched a nerve or hurt my feelings… But I do always feel it necessary to correct ignorance when I see it. You have to understand that I am smarter than 99.9% of the people you will ever meet. And I am just as well educated and is well-informed. It's my duty to correct those beneath me especially when they are as arrogant as they are ignorant.
@@lokitakahashi3042 graduated high school, graduated college, and yes I am better informed and smarter than you are. By the way, just because you're stuck working at McDonald's stop assuming everybody else is… Stop projecting, little girl, your betters don't have time for you
He's not trying to interrupt her, every time she pauses after finishing her sentence he tries to speak. That is normal in conversation. If you wait too long to say your next sentence, people will talk over you. This happens to me all the time. People aren't being rude or disrespectful, they just think you've finished talking.
Nobody else would have the balls or be that stupid? You do know that lawyers tend to be more successful when they don’t piss off the fucking judge right?
plus the expert witnesses who are paid for their time and possibly travel expenses to appear when the judge knows the trial won't continue until the State Supreme Court answers the motion.
@@ygrittesnow1701what i was thinking too, i even think he went in slightly arguementativeto get this reaction out of her so he can appeal on bias later, but im in no way a law expert so im not sure
Imagine being a kid, growing up and arguing the shit out of things, suffering the repercussions of arguing with anyone who will listen - and finding out LAWYERS do this and get paid. Then having a judge tell you, to stop talking and listen more. This fearless advocacy from a lawyer is what I’m hoping for if I ever need it.
if you can afford one. live all over the world, including commie nations. our system is the best going BUT in any nation the color of justice is the color of the money. the justice you receive is based on your net worth. even the rich who are convicted don't suffer like the working class convicted.
That bailiff is obnoxious. He should get a contempt.. And to Mr Forman, well done sir!! I wish all attorneys would stand up to judges who think they are above the law.
Think how many poor souls are subjected to the abusive jurisdiction of absolute Kangaroo Kourts in Tennessee state where the judiciary fights hard to keep cameras out, period, and even refuse inspection of Public Record audio recordings.
@5:35 the judge seems to say she's going to look into the decision, now. Then goes on a rant, expressing her frustration with being interupted. If she weren't interrupted, she would have continued, without jurisdiction. KANGAROO COURT INTERRUPTED.
"Chief Justice Minton says wait until a decision" "MY chief Justice says keep rolling" "... you're being disrespectful Mr Foreman" She's the disrespectful one by circumventing state law
Your a weapon mate and I would love to have you on my defense team 😃 I'm an Australian that has unfortunately spent most of my life in and out of our courts so you can imagine how many times I have had a front row seat for clashes just as entertaining as this one was. Much respect to you for standing your ground. My long suffering lawyer (and friend) has actually recently been made a judge which gives me some hope for our courts as from what I can see you are both much alike. My question for you Mr Foreman is do you have a similar end goal to become a judge? And is that something you can aim for with the system you guys have over there?
Judge in 2020: “someday, you’ll learn to listen more and talk less” Mr Foreman in 2022: “Nah. I’m an attorney. I like arguing and you’re still wrong, your honor”
@@ihatecrackhead The defendant's attorney was quoting case law, not Statute, and there is a difference. Also, I thought I heard the case-law cited as "Southwest Second" [SW2nd], which would indicate Decisions made in Arizona or New Mexico. He is before a Kentucky court. The cases may be of persuasive value, but not probative, i.e. compelling of a Kentucky court. My hunch is that the trial court has Jurisdiction, although it would be prudent for this judge not to declare same until the matter is reviewed by the Chief Administrative Judge. What defense counsel seeks to do is remove this particular Judge from this particular case. Without seeing the Motion contents, it is unclear what the grounds are. I would have to assume some demonstration of lack of impartiality. A smart judge just grants the recusal and lets another judge deal with it. This Judge has apparent ego issues and a thinly-disguised desire of revenge, and that breeds disdain for the court system in the general public.
Judge Hurley is a great judge, he is loved by many for his genuine attitude.... he was also accusing an attorney of running the court his way.... and told him that many others had a similar problem with him., that the court is run by the judge and not by the attorney....he wanted to say his rulings whether the suspect will stay in jail or not and the attorney was pushing his own agenda, but the attorney was not pushing it so hard, he was actually quiet most of the time...didn't push it so hard as Mr. Forman did in these videos...But I understand that Dui's cases are different than the cases of Judge Hurley who ahs a real offender.
Courts set the procedures and then get salty when you expect them to follow the rules & laws they themselves decided upon. Rules only apply when it's convenient for them.
The judge knew she could make snide remarks because he hasbthe almighty power to do it. She did more taking than the DUI guy on trying to stop him from talking.
This judge evidently does not realize that she she has a odd way of speaking that includes pauses that invite a response. Then when she gets a response she decides that it is disrespectful. What a pain.
We filed a motion to recuse the judge because we felt she had personal bias against me as counsel based on statements she said about me in previous court hearings. It was ultimately denied.
@@TheDUIGuyPlus at least the whole world can see her shameful behavior now thanks to you and the internet. Nice job knowing the law. I appreciate your efforts to maintain composure while dealing with an egotistical judge. I hope her unprofessional behavior on the bench is reported for review.
There's no such thing as a "justice system", the courts are a joke because it's all about financial negotiations, nothing more, every case has a dollar tag on it
She hasn't tried to let you talk. Everything she said after that was pure hypocritical outta her mouth from how she was responding earlier in the matter.
It is frustrating and disrespectful when you try to circumvent the law at your convenience against the people. Thank you for exposing this corruption to the public.
Are you serious? The lawyer is being rude and disrespect to the Court. His interpretation is an argument not a finding. The Judge stated that she is waiting for the higher level ruling. My god there are so many low IQ posts here supporting the showboating lawyer.
Wuaoooo this is truly a lawyer here, I've hire a lawyer years ago for dui, and when at the court he wouldn't say a word on my behalf, I keep looking at him, and was like dude here is when say something, I could've done a better defense myself, and the worst I noticed is that at least 70% of lawyers do the same, good on you Mr dui LAWYER
A judge that doesn't want to follow the law....now that's a surprise....lol...whip her into shape DUI guy....the man truly is an attorney that fights for the people and I love watching him work
Dude you’re completely wrong. All the judge is saying is that the matter was set for trial on Friday and now there’s this other motion up in front of another judge so they’re waiting for his ruling to come back down and she say just come back day-to-day until we get the ruling. She’s not beginning the trial at all she’s just saying each day will meet at one and see if there’s a rule and if not then we come back the next day but if there’s a ruling we’re ready to go if that’s the ruling as she’s certainly within the rights to do that they do this all the time with cases that are set for trial to get trailed or 1 million different reasons but it certainly wasn’t her prerogative to make him come back each day to see if the ruling Has arrived yet. The lawyer is trying to delay the trial obviously and so what he wants her to do is just let him not show up and then when they get the ruling reset the case for trial and she doesn’t have to do that so you’re wrong. Also people always admire lawyers that fight like this, but in the long run it doesn’t do your client any service because all it does is aggravate the judge and having the judge aggravated against you and your client is not a good thing you can be a zealous advocate without being a jerk every time she said something he was stepping on her toes she let him speak without ever interrupting him
I can relate to the feeling of exasperation that is evident in his voice. It’s the frustration of trying to explain something to someone who has been given authority, something they would already know if they were actually qualified to hold the authority they possess, and having no recourse against their incompetence.
She is just made because he is showing her and telling her how to do her job according to the law and she doesn't like it, she has no business being a judge!
She did not. And Chief Justice Minton denied our motion. We got lucky when we tried the case Thursday and Friday last week, as she was busy and a different judge stepped in for her.
"Where a magistrate, having statutory criminal jurisdiction, assumes jurisdiction of one complained or informed against under a complaint or information not alleging a crime which he has jurisdiction to try or to investigate and hold thereon to the Grand Jury, and deprives such persons of his liberty for purpose of trial, examination or otherwise, he becomes liable for false imprisonment." - Maher v. Potter, 112 N.Y. Supp. 102.
There is an upside. If she had proceeded and it was determined that she didn't have the jurisdiction to try the case. All testimony and evidence would have fallen under double jeopardy. Wouldn't be the defendant's fault the courts broke the law.
Am I understanding this correctly..?...judge requires all involved to meet everyday at 1pm...until the pertinent paperwork is received...? That would be an unnecessary time waste...to say the least. Her poor attitude is another story altogether... :(
IMO> How wonderful that more and more, court-room, cameras are being shown for the world to see. I think she might need a brush up on the laws she is to follow, as they seem quite different than the ones she is trying to enforce and it bothers her someone is informing her how it's done?
She is the one that kept cutting you off. Wow what a mean spirited fudge (judge) she needs to leave her personal issues out of the court room and come clear minded instead of being so witchy
Did you watch the video? He clearly cuts her off a number of times and adds little 2-4 word remarks while she is speaking. Her frustration at that is understandable.
👍Ugh... This judge has an ego issue that is very frustrating. She is also not honest or informed about this law. I'm sure she fought tooth and nail to keep control over this case. It is very hard to not speak up when someone is not listening and understanding what you are trying to say. Good for you standing up to her.💪 #FreeEricBrandt💔
I would give up a limb to have an attorney like this man.
A good lawyer usually costs an arm AND a leg.
a lawyer like this usually gets you more time in jail.
He actually has a pretty good track record, but his cases tend to go before a jury (by choice). Besides I’d rather have a lawyer like this rather than one that just plays ball with the judge & prosecutor & just goes with whatever they dec. If he’s wanting to recuse this judge, he most likely has a damn good reason.
So true. Finding an attorney willing to stand up to and against a judge is rare. Hey! I shouldn't be surprised to see you here😊
@@trashpanda2312 actually he has helped a lot of people from getting jail time you clown check his record before you make a baseless comment
The fact she is fighting tooth and nail to not be recused speaks badly for her. She is literally the opposite of impartial.
Once the judge starts fighting recusal u know
That's not actually what they're fighting over here. The issue is that the law requires her to stay the proceedings until a ruling on her recusal has been issued. But instead of doing that she is requiring all parties involved to show up to court every day as if the trial is going to commence, wait around for hours until she decides they're not getting a ruling on the recusal motion that day, and then rinsing and repeating every day. So everyone involved in this case has been wasting hours every day for almost two weeks standing around the courtroom when they all know that the recusal motion hasn't been ruled on and that the case is not proceeding.
@@Rowgue51 Correct.
That said, whether or not to hold proceedings (even for a status conference) seems to fall within "judicial" acts (albeit without jurisdiction) rather than "administrative" acts therefore, even if she is wrong to hold further proceedings, she would have absolute immunity from any consequences.
On the other hand, if the court is truly acting without lawful authority by lacking jurisdiction, the parties have no legal duty to show up for any proceedings.
The parties COULD choose that option if they are confident they are correct on the legal issue BUT (the classic big "but") that choice would likely not be without undesirable consequences.
PS
I, personally, interrupted a court proceeding (municipal court in my small city) because I thought it lacked jurisdiction and was immediately put in jail for 2 hours and issued a judgment of contempt of court against me. I still think I was correct on the law but the three judge appeal panel thought otherwise - although one of those judges issued a dissent to say that, in their opinion, the contempt of court should have been reversed because the process for issuing a contempt of court judgment was not properly followed.
I may have a "contempt of court" conviction on my record, but no proceedings have been held by that municipal court ever since that day, over 8 years later (7/10/2015).
She needs to go to DC where all the judges can do whatever the hell they want to do.
@busterellis7188 nope..wrong again sparky...Aileen Cannon Florida Judge...appointed to the federal bench with 4 trials under her belt and no federal cases ever. SHE'S UNQUALIFIED
Asking a judge to follow the law automatically becomes unpleasant ? ! You can see she has never been challenged before
Stop bringing up the law or I'll find you in contempt.
Never been told no as a child seems like
Judge Karen.
@@ShapesWithoutColors - Stop Resisting!!!!
@@ShapesWithoutColors no bail, life in prison, and contempt of court 90 days contempt must be followed consecutively with life in prison. That's my order take him away bailiff
This judge is a example of whats wrong with the "justice" system. She believes she is beyond being questioned by anyone that she deems to be below her. Ego!
It’s not just ego she literally is sat above everybody else in the room and everybody has to rise when she enters or leaves… she was placed in a position of power in a cult… How do you expect her to act?
@@zippymax1 men have hormone imbalances as well, don’t throw that crap out as women cannot do a superb job, she is screwing up just as male judges screw with their huge hormonal egos. So drop that BS.
@@blondzruleall5443 PMS much?
@@blondzruleall5443 You are so right. You never hear this kind of BS when the male judge is 'man'strating.
@@gavinl4388 I agree. I always thought it was strange how courts give judges this god-like reverence.
When you provide the law to the judge, and the judge refuses to follow the law, that judge should be removed from being a judge.
And should be arrested for breaking it
Nah. Every profession has people like the judge. She is one of those that gets everyone else to do her job for her. Under the guise of collaboration. I'm extremely in favor of team collaboration but when every task you have requires said "collaboration" you're really just pawning your work off onto others. But with a judge I would much rather she ask for assistance than make a decision when she isn't aware of the law.
She wasn't gonna do it though cuz he wasn't gonna have it which was cool as hell
Every qualified immunity case ever follows that standard, and I've been pushing to just arrest all involved for years instead of making a law to cover for something the judiciary made up to usurp another law.
They generally do what they want.
This judge missed that part of the law when she was in law school.
When you have a lawyer that’s literally arguing hisself out of extra payed days at court you know you’ve chosen the right one
and now you know why she's trying to roll the case - it will cost the defendant his own time and lawyer fees. The DUI guy knows it and that's why he's upset. It's clear she has it out for Larry and the DUI guy is using the law to prevent it from happening. Other lawyers would bow down
What makes you think he gets paid by the day?
@@Colgate64 well, lawyers bill by the hour so....
@@juneslugg2 lawyers generally have a flat fee. If they are retained you pay by the hour when get guidance. At least that’s been my experience in speaking with multiple attorneys. And also living with 2.
Not always true i was billed 300 an hour for a 10 months of court with my ex for custody and child support. Crazy expensive but not as expensive as what she was trying to get out of me.
When a judge likes what you are saying back and forth is fine. When they don't, it is considered rude and interrupting. Egos are fragile things.
So you acknowledge it's rude
@@johnchrysostomon6284 Yes, she/it is a very rude woman/thing. Menopausal, obviously.
@@johnchrysostomon6284 he acknowledges that the judge views it as such when it’s folding in them
She rambles and doesn't allow responses
In this video Judge Hurley who uses a very empathic neutral tone of voice told the lawyer to be more professional..."Court Cam: Judge John Hurley SCOLDS LAWYER For Lack of Professionalism"
I actually like the fact that when this male judge says opinion he says it repetitively but with a normal voice.
I think this female judge probably just needs to change the tone of voice.... Because some people take it as offensive speech.
Maybe people enjoy more neutrality of mind don't like it if judges or lawyers don't use neutrality of mind and voice.
But it seems people in comments don't use neutrality as well, they are often judgmental rude for various reasons but say that judge can not do it, or lawyer can not do it or teacher can not do it or officer can not do it... no matter the gender or nongender or whatever.
Disgusting corrupt judge. She interrupted him a hundred times and plays a victim card saying she allowed him to speak, where she has literally told him "I'm gonna cut you off here", and proceeded to keep interrupting him. Horrible judge.
This woman is an emotional and egotistical, showing almost ZERO objectivity in this situation. I an only project this is how she rules on her cases, which may be a massive miscarriage of justice.
That's not what I was seeing. He was being aggressive probably in a effort to goad her into saying somthing that he could use to show bias. He knew what he was doing. She was just reacting to that.
I can't wait till we pass that job off to AI
@__-vo7iq he literally told her she is breaking the law every day and she blatantly has no respect for that law.
@@__-vo7iq When the law is clearly written and a judge ignores it in favor of their own opinion, that is showing zero respect for the law itself.
They want the accused to keep having to repeatedly come back, day after day, racking up attorney fees. So corrupt. And her editorial critical comments are completely outside any reasonable standard of behavior for a judge. Get her off that 'bench'!
More importantly, they are racking up court fees.
Yeah keep in mind everybody there gets paid for attending except the poor guy who got the charge!!
@@valnnoahjohnson5884 That guy is probably missing work as well. The only one losing income to be there.
She's outmatched and you can see it in her frustration
Just more proof that "IT" doesn't smell good all 28 days.... especially this day.
@@franram7426 Are you implying she was on her moon blood?
@@chuckfarley2766
Hhhhmmmm
She's laughably outmatched.
Maybe, but she's still the judge and she had every right to call out the lawyer talking over her. This stands regardless if the lawyer is wrong or 100% correct with his claim.
She repeatedly interrupted Mr. Forman whilst he was speaking, not allowing him to make a record, then claims she allowed him to speak. She is an unprofessional judge, if not corrupt.
But she "tried" not too she said. Mr. Forman did you atleast try and not interrupt her? I believe you must have.
@@zappyeats2579 faaacts and its disrspectful u have to respect her and her court ot goes both ways its almost like your parent yall may not agree and they maybe wrong u still have to respect them
so
PUT SOME DAMN RESPECT ON THAT JUDGE!!!!!!
@@deedee_31 I believe maybe you might have misconstrued my post. I believe Larry was very respectful of her. He was simply advocating for his client.
Also there is also something else going on that attorney/client privilege maybe won't allow him to share. But there is definitely a reason she is being asked to be recused from the case. It tells me it must be serious if he told his client to stand by and not even come into court.
Ohhhhh yeah she was interrupting biggggg time
Only thing she can judge is an eating contest.
Well done sir, put the judge in check in the most respectful and professional way possible.
👏👏👏
There should be cameras in every courtroom in America
Judge: "What question do you have for me?"
Attorney: "You have no legal jurisdiction to continue. Period."
Judge: "Let me be the judge of that."
*Insanity.*
The judge actually said 'Let the chief justice be the judge of that.' The Chief Justice has not yet decided. The defence attorney is insisting that she should be treating this as if the Chief Justice had decided against her. Do you not see the problem with the position the defence attorney is taking?
@@nctpti2073 No problem with it at all You're failing to see that she CANNOT ACT AT ALL until it's been decided. Do you see the problem with that?
@@MissionaryInMexico Say for the moment, someone makes an accusation against the state bar, including all judges and prosecutors generally, in response to having been arrested. Regardless of the fact there is almost certainly no merit to that accusation, they simply get to walk?
It does not work that way. She is only staying the proceeding. Now I do agree that she should likely not schedule the proverbial next hearing until after there is an answer, but other than that, she is not actually hearing the case at the moment.
@@nctpti2073 How do you not understand? SHE CANT DO ANYTHING UNTIL ITS BEEN DECIDED.
@@snowbird2893 Which means she also cannot simply dismiss the case. Staying the proceedings is the judicial equivalent of doing nothing. Now should some other judge have been sitting in her place? Quite plausibly, however, if she can't do anything, she could not make that decision either, could she?
Assuming he has money for appeal, a judge improperly failing to recuse herself is the best thing that can happen, because it provides grounds for overturning a conviction if things don't go well for the client.
Hey what does recuse mean brother?
@@egcoon2750 Take herself off the case.
@@egcoon2750 when a judge takes him/herself off a case because they have at least a perceived conflict of interest with one of the parties involved on the case.
This doesn't apply to judges only. For instance a city council member would recuse from voting on a motion if there is a conflict of interest. Pretty much anytime there is a conflict of interest a person should recuse themselves from a situation.
The client should be granted a free appeal and the judge sanctioned in every case of failure to recuse
Judge should be disbarred. She’s literally saying I don’t care about the law or jurisdiction it’s my court room I’ll do what I want.
I hope the people of this county/city can see how this judge acts towards defendants
How else do you think she got the job
Louisville, Kentucky is notoriously corrupt.
Every time a judge allows qualified immunity to end a case is basically the same thing. At some point many generations from now we might actually start arresting people for it.
There is so much ego tripping and power tripping in every level of law enforcement! End qualified immunity now and implement more measures to have accountability and transparency!
TO BAD EVERY LAWYER ISN'T LIKE THAT
It takes courage to go after a judge like this. This lawyer was within the law and good for him to challenge unlawful orders, even if they come from a judge. You sir are a stand up guy who happens to be a great lawyer. 👍
She doesn’t understand what jurisdiction means. She has none yet she is still trying to control everyone in the court.
Must judges don't understand the limits to their authority.
Exactly; what else is new?!!
@@Nightfighter82 Your opinion is based on what oh that's right nothing
Fun fact; most judges are elected and are not always attorneys. Some have no idea what the laws are.
@@keithziegler8881
You a judge? Or do you just like the way their pickle tastes?
This is an example of someone who cannot interpret and understand words. Even though the law is clear and unambiguous she states "what people have told me is. . .",showing she can't interpret clearly written words. That's a great example of unintelligent people rising through a system.
Peter Principle: Everyone tends to rise to a position above their level of competence.
Blame-shifter. She's an over-rated, over-paid tyrannical narcissist.
Obviously a diversity hire
@@elpatron7916 Larry had a LIVE today where he explains it a bit more.
C-an't U-nderstand N-ormal T-thinking The world is half full of them.
All rise for judge Karen. This is a damn good lawyer.
I bet she smells like rancid yeast and three-day-old deodorant residue.
I wonder if he can catch bricks 🤔
Judge Hurley is a great judge, he is loved by many for his genuine attitude.... he was also accusing an attorney of running the court his way, it's in one of the videos..... and told him that many others had a similar problem with him. that the court is run by the judge and not by the attorney, and that he was asked before to change attitude but he never did, and he asked him to finally change the attitude....he wanted to say his rulings whether the suspect will stay in jail or not and the attorney was pushing his own agenda, but the attorney was not pushing it so hard, he was actually quiet most of the time...didn't push it so hard as Mr. Forman did in these videos...But I understand that Dui's cases are different than the cases of Judge Hurley who ahs a real offender.....It seems some courts are mostly run by the judges as Hurley who speak the rulings 95 percent of the time, but he is also very empathic and doesn't want to punish the addicts too much, or too less,..But it's confusing when the judge has the right to speak and when not.. if Judge Hurley explained to the attorney how disprespectful his behavior is, for running the court his way and expecting his agenda to make rulings for his clients. The attorney only said I need only this and this and the judge replied ok we will write it down and take care of the request...or something like that. It seems Judge Hurley&y likes to have things done quickly therefore he doesn't like it when someone is trying to run it differently in different timing. Maybe the timing of the speech was the biggest problem because then the judge could not focus on the papers that he was reading and studying.. so he loved things in his own tempo and timing...So maybe this lady is not a bad person, maybe she likes to have some orders...and I guess if she will know Mr. Forman better, she will understand his type of work more and better....In some videos the female lawyer was annoying but the female judge was annoyed by her attitude and interruptions but she as the judge was very decent to her, she tried to be fair..and told her in a polite manner to do it the right way...and explained to her that she wants to be fair to both sides... in the end, she said I have to today many other cases you have to give me some break, I didn't have lunch yet etc.
Judge Karen, hah. "Mr Forman, I will hold both you AND your manager in contempt"
@@alaalfa8839 Sentences and paragraphs are your friend. They might make your messages readable.
Massive blocks of text are your enemy. I wanted to read it, but became annoyed by the writing style.
It is so concerning to see a judge behave this way! To belittle an attorney who is clearly making a valid point for her to follow the law, this is so concerning of this judge on so many levels!!! These are the judges we do not need! Clearly she feels she is powerful, everyone else is beneath her, and she doesn't like to be rightfully called out when she is clearly wrong! To belittle an attorney like that, yet she's the one who began interrupting him! Sadly, this attorney is in front of her a lot. Makes you wonder how he could be mistreated in front of her on his next case. I would file a grievance!
How can you set a case for trial when you haven't established jurisdcition....The Court has no power to move forward - what is so difficult for this judge to understand?
You could just imagine how many people she sent to jail
This Judge is out of control . Her cop like EGO and disrespect for the Court rules and law she should be turned over to the State Bar . If I was an attorney there is no way and am letting this Judge get away with her kind of treatment and disregard for the law .
She's unwilling to follow the law as written and yet her frustration is with him continuing to tell her what the law is. This judge really needs to either be brought up to the bar, or have her self-educated.
You should really pay attention to how you use hyphens.
"That guy is a big-ass pirate"
Is a lot different from
"That guy is a big ass-pirate"
@@sublimehypocrisy. Actually, there wasn’t even a need of a hyphen. My pet peeve is the overuse of the words and subsequent watering down of their meanings. Words such as ‘genius’, ‘GOAT’, and ‘legend/legendary’ for example. Or the redundant use of the word ‘literally’!
education won't fix what is clearly broken.
this
Wow! Her ego is insane. She is projecting super hard. She is the one that can’t help being snarky and it’s clear that she keeps interrupting him because she knows he’s right and doesn’t want to admit she’s wrong. These are not the people that should be judges in our courts.
I lost it when she said "I let you speak without interrupting, why won't you do the same?" She literally interrupted him several times to tell him to hurry up
It is sad that there are judges like this in America
She has nothing but disrespect for the law and she is sitting on the bench. Miz Diz Honor.
Your opinion she is disrespecting the laws based on your ignorance of the law and you can keep your ignorant comments yourself
@@keithziegler8881 did that comment touch a nerve? Hurt your feelings?
@@shiftyswifty325
No it neither touched a nerve or hurt my feelings… But I do always feel it necessary to correct ignorance when I see it.
You have to understand that I am smarter than 99.9% of the people you will ever meet.
And I am just as well educated and is well-informed.
It's my duty to correct those beneath me especially when they are as arrogant as they are ignorant.
@@keithziegler8881 and is well informed? ya, I doubt you graduated high school. have fun trying to pretend your smart and important at you Mc Job
@@lokitakahashi3042 graduated high school, graduated college, and yes I am better informed and smarter than you are.
By the way, just because you're stuck working at McDonald's stop assuming everybody else is… Stop projecting, little girl, your betters don't have time for you
He's not trying to interrupt her, every time she pauses after finishing her sentence he tries to speak. That is normal in conversation. If you wait too long to say your next sentence, people will talk over you. This happens to me all the time. People aren't being rude or disrespectful, they just think you've finished talking.
This judge should step down permanently
We need more women judges. You should see the women judges out of Detroit.
@@mrfarts5176Fr women shouldn’t be judges unless they are exceptional. Too emotional
@@lukekiefer5964 agree
@@mrfarts5176yagdi
Her being a judge speaks to how corrupt the judicial system really is.
THE DUI GUY HAS BALLS OF STEEL TO PUT THIS JUDGE IN CHECK!!! NO ONE ELSE WOULD HAVE THE BALLS TO DO THAT!!! ⚖️💯💪🥇
Nobody else would have the balls or be that stupid? You do know that lawyers tend to be more successful when they don’t piss off the fucking judge right?
OMG WHO can afford to have themselves AND there lawyer in court every day until they get an answer? PS, I wouldn't trust her to be fair.
Pre established bias. Sounds like good grounds for an overturn on appeal if it goes bad.
Kentucky kangaroo court of course.
plus the expert witnesses who are paid for their time and possibly travel expenses to appear when the judge knows the trial won't continue until the State Supreme Court answers the motion.
Especially near a buffet. 👀🤣😂
@@ygrittesnow1701what i was thinking too, i even think he went in slightly arguementativeto get this reaction out of her so he can appeal on bias later, but im in no way a law expert so im not sure
I hope for his clients sake this judge has to recuse herself, I’m beginning to see why Larry is so intent on this motion.
I thought most judges just let it go, she's got a bone to pick with Larry.
Imagine being a kid, growing up and arguing the shit out of things, suffering the repercussions of arguing with anyone who will listen - and finding out LAWYERS do this and get paid. Then having a judge tell you, to stop talking and listen more. This fearless advocacy from a lawyer is what I’m hoping for if I ever need it.
if you can afford one. live all over the world, including commie nations. our system is the best going BUT in any nation the color of justice is the color of the money. the justice you receive is based on your net worth. even the rich who are convicted don't suffer like the working class convicted.
@@xusmico187 our system is the best???? Oke, you live under a rock?
@@RepairPlusplus
How can there be anything wrong with a 99% conviction rate in federal court? The People's Republic of China has the same system,,,🤔
to many judges who don't belong on the bench.
That bailiff is obnoxious. He should get a contempt.. And to Mr Forman, well done sir!! I wish all attorneys would stand up to judges who think they are above the law.
This just shows how corrupt the whole system is
Think how many poor souls are subjected to the abusive jurisdiction of absolute Kangaroo Kourts in Tennessee state where the judiciary fights hard to keep cameras out, period, and even refuse inspection of Public Record audio recordings.
Same in NC can’t get dash or body cams unless you go all way to Supreme Court of the state and says you can get it!!
It's a complete joke
@5:35 the judge seems to say she's going to look into the decision, now. Then goes on a rant, expressing her frustration with being interupted. If she weren't interrupted, she would have continued, without jurisdiction. KANGAROO COURT INTERRUPTED.
Do you believe this shit. Find this corrupt judge and throw her feckless ass in jail. Any other judge.
"Chief Justice Minton says wait until a decision"
"MY chief Justice says keep rolling"
"... you're being disrespectful Mr Foreman"
She's the disrespectful one by circumventing state law
Outrageous.
Your a weapon mate and I would love to have you on my defense team 😃 I'm an Australian that has unfortunately spent most of my life in and out of our courts so you can imagine how many times I have had a front row seat for clashes just as entertaining as this one was. Much respect to you for standing your ground. My long suffering lawyer (and friend) has actually recently been made a judge which gives me some hope for our courts as from what I can see you are both much alike. My question for you Mr Foreman is do you have a similar end goal to become a judge? And is that something you can aim for with the system you guys have over there?
Incompetent Judge. To think this woman gets to decide the fate of people’s lives is scary.
Judge in 2020: “someday, you’ll learn to listen more and talk less”
Mr Foreman in 2022: “Nah. I’m an attorney. I like arguing and you’re still wrong, your honor”
the law he quoted didn't seem ambiguous
also if she has no jurisdiction, then she can't do anything
And she should do less eating and more walking, as we're giving advice out.
@@lehanedermot But she has that standing desk "for her health" :-D
@@ihatecrackhead The defendant's attorney was quoting case law, not Statute, and there is a difference. Also, I thought I heard the case-law cited as "Southwest Second" [SW2nd], which would indicate Decisions made in Arizona or New Mexico. He is before a Kentucky court. The cases may be of persuasive value, but not probative, i.e. compelling of a Kentucky court. My hunch is that the trial court has Jurisdiction, although it would be prudent for this judge not to declare same until the matter is reviewed by the Chief Administrative Judge.
What defense counsel seeks to do is remove this particular Judge from this particular case. Without seeing the Motion contents, it is unclear what the grounds are. I would have to assume some demonstration of lack of impartiality. A smart judge just grants the recusal and lets another judge deal with it. This Judge has apparent ego issues and a thinly-disguised desire of revenge, and that breeds disdain for the court system in the general public.
Judge Hurley is a great judge, he is loved by many for his genuine attitude.... he was also accusing an attorney of running the court his way.... and told him that many others had a similar problem with him., that the court is run by the judge and not by the attorney....he wanted to say his rulings whether the suspect will stay in jail or not and the attorney was pushing his own agenda, but the attorney was not pushing it so hard, he was actually quiet most of the time...didn't push it so hard as Mr. Forman did in these videos...But I understand that Dui's cases are different than the cases of Judge Hurley who ahs a real offender.
she doesnt like being told to do her job properly.
Courts set the procedures and then get salty when you expect them to follow the rules & laws they themselves decided upon. Rules only apply when it's convenient for them.
Anytime I've seen a judge in the wrong, they punished whoever pointed it out.
I have NEVER EVER met a judge I liked.
Judge gets defensive when she’s called out for trying to go rogue LOL
My 8 year old wouldn't even act as childish as this judge. She can not and will not admit she's wrong. Get her larry!!
Quickly the Judge said . For that comment this is one complaint I would turn this Judge over to the State Bar . You bet I would
You accidentally left out the quote itself. Now I wanna know what you said.
Judges do that all the time.
My lawyer beat my case just because the judge acted on emotion not law
An unquestionable judge is called a biased prosecutor and should not be on any bench!
we need more lawyers that are passionate like this guy is... May God richly bless him!
The judge knew she could make snide remarks because he hasbthe almighty power to do it. She did more taking than the DUI guy on trying to stop him from talking.
This judge evidently does not realize that she she has a odd way of speaking that includes pauses that invite a response. Then when she gets a response she decides that it is disrespectful. What a pain.
I've met people like that. It's just weird to have a conversation with them.
That judge is a hypocrite and was continuously cutting him off.
These type of people need to be removed
She is what makes our court system dangerous. Laws are laws and a robe does not mean laws do not apply to the person in the robe.
The judge has a poor attitude and didn't behave in a professional manner. However, my question is why the judge was asked to be recused?
Lack of jurisdiction.
Because she has no jurisdiction and she’s a tyrant who doesn’t follow the law. That’s not a judge that needs to be in any case
We filed a motion to recuse the judge because we felt she had personal bias against me as counsel based on statements she said about me in previous court hearings. It was ultimately denied.
@The DUI Guy+ thank you for the response! That must be frustrating and the judge behaved like a tyrant.
Wish you the best of luck in the future sir.
@@TheDUIGuyPlus at least the whole world can see her shameful behavior now thanks to you and the internet. Nice job knowing the law. I appreciate your efforts to maintain composure while dealing with an egotistical judge. I hope her unprofessional behavior on the bench is reported for review.
She is a judge??? How scary. No wonder our so called Justice System is so broken
There's no such thing as a "justice system", the courts are a joke because it's all about financial negotiations, nothing more, every case has a dollar tag on it
Wow, I have respect for this attorney for sure. He’s fantastic!
so she interrupts him... then says "you interrupt me which is frustrating"... how can someone so oblivious and hypocritical be a judge?
Everyone involved should personally sue that judge for lost wages.
She hasn't tried to let you talk. Everything she said after that was pure hypocritical outta her mouth from how she was responding earlier in the matter.
It is frustrating and disrespectful when you try to circumvent the law at your convenience against the people. Thank you for exposing this corruption to the public.
Are you serious? The lawyer is being rude and disrespect to the Court. His interpretation is an argument not a finding. The Judge stated that she is waiting for the higher level ruling.
My god there are so many low IQ posts here supporting the showboating lawyer.
The judge is dirty to the core! Her entire family’s financials should be looked into!!
*This Judge thinks she has the power to give herself more Authority over what she's allowed according to the law.*
What’s sad is that if she screws up they’ll need more time and money to throw her verdict out.
Every attorney needs to be like this. For Christ’s sake- people’s lives are on the line
Very true
Wuaoooo this is truly a lawyer here, I've hire a lawyer years ago for dui, and when at the court he wouldn't say a word on my behalf, I keep looking at him, and was like dude here is when say something, I could've done a better defense myself, and the worst I noticed is that at least 70% of lawyers do the same, good on you Mr dui LAWYER
Their relationship with the judge is more important than their relationship with you.
A judge that doesn't want to follow the law....now that's a surprise....lol...whip her into shape DUI guy....the man truly is an attorney that fights for the people and I love watching him work
Dude you’re completely wrong. All the judge is saying is that the matter was set for trial on Friday and now there’s this other motion up in front of another judge so they’re waiting for his ruling to come back down and she say just come back day-to-day until we get the ruling. She’s not beginning the trial at all she’s just saying each day will meet at one and see if there’s a rule and if not then we come back the next day but if there’s a ruling we’re ready to go if that’s the ruling as she’s certainly within the rights to do that they do this all the time with cases that are set for trial to get trailed or 1 million different reasons but it certainly wasn’t her prerogative to make him come back each day to see if the ruling Has arrived yet. The lawyer is trying to delay the trial obviously and so what he wants her to do is just let him not show up and then when they get the ruling reset the case for trial and she doesn’t have to do that so you’re wrong. Also people always admire lawyers that fight like this, but in the long run it doesn’t do your client any service because all it does is aggravate the judge and having the judge aggravated against you and your client is not a good thing you can be a zealous advocate without being a jerk every time she said something he was stepping on her toes she let him speak without ever interrupting him
Turns out being a Judge is not "pleasant".
This judge is abusing her authority to punish a lawyer she doesn’t like. She has no business being a judge!
Its funny to me that the judge has no problem interrupting the lawyer but has a hissy fit when he answers her questions.
they are the "rules" of court. when the judge opens their mouth, close yours. when she gets angry and challenged him, he shut up.
I can relate to the feeling of exasperation that is evident in his voice. It’s the frustration of trying to explain something to someone who has been given authority, something they would already know if they were actually qualified to hold the authority they possess, and having no recourse against their incompetence.
🎯🎯🎯
She absolutely has NO CLUE!!!🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️
Good job holding her to the letter of the law! Stay strong 💪
This whole exercise is exactly what is fatally flawed with the system.
She is just made because he is showing her and telling her how to do her job according to the law and she doesn't like it, she has no business being a judge!
“You have no jurisdiction”
“But what are you trying to tell me?”
Mr. Forman, PLEASE, YOU CAN NOT LEAVE US HANGING LIKE THIS! what happened, did she recuse herself? What happened at trial?
DUI Guy is teh debil!!
Right?!?! We need answers!!
She did not. And Chief Justice Minton denied our motion. We got lucky when we tried the case Thursday and Friday last week, as she was busy and a different judge stepped in for her.
Videos of the trial to follow.
@@TheDUIGuyPlus AWESOME!
I have a feeling she isn’t very good in conversations with people out of court either lmao
So she thinks that the law applies only to everyone else? Sad to see this behavior from a judge.
"Where a magistrate, having statutory criminal jurisdiction, assumes jurisdiction of one complained or informed against under a complaint or information not alleging a crime which he has jurisdiction to try or to investigate and hold thereon to the Grand Jury, and deprives such persons of his liberty for purpose of trial, examination or otherwise, he becomes liable for false imprisonment." - Maher v. Potter, 112 N.Y. Supp. 102.
There is an upside. If she had proceeded and it was determined that she didn't have the jurisdiction to try the case. All testimony and evidence would have fallen under double jeopardy. Wouldn't be the defendant's fault the courts broke the law.
Am I understanding this correctly..?...judge requires all involved to meet everyday at 1pm...until the pertinent paperwork is received...? That would be an unnecessary time waste...to say the least. Her poor attitude is another story altogether... :(
I once heard a lawyer say that anything's legal as long as you're not caught. At that point I quit being a paralegal.
She's so not used to ppl questioning her 😂
She was going to "roll with it" untill you demanded a stay! Then she thought for a minute and decided to stay the case till you get a decision!
How did she become a judge?
Do you really want an answer to that?
Bitch pauses for 15 seconds, dude starts talking, and miraculously she’s not finished
Well who would of thought? A judge that thinks the law is disrespectful.
Judges think theybare above the law... we have seen it over and over...
IMO> How wonderful that more and more, court-room, cameras are being shown for the world to see. I think she might need a brush up on the laws she is to follow, as they seem quite different than the ones she is trying to enforce and it bothers her someone is informing her how it's done?
She is the one that kept cutting you off. Wow what a mean spirited fudge (judge) she needs to leave her personal issues out of the court room and come clear minded instead of being so witchy
Did you watch the video? He clearly cuts her off a number of times and adds little 2-4 word remarks while she is speaking. Her frustration at that is understandable.
@@lydialutz She interrupted him at the beginning. She wants him to shut his mouth but she can't shut hers while he is talking.
@@alecb8509 Yeah, but that doesn't negate what I said.
@@alecb8509 Everything he said could have documented in a written motion. His showboating was rude and disrespectful.
Having Larry Forman as your lawyer is exactly like having a pocket Nuke with you.
Sure. If you think so.
@@interestedobserver587 you jelly of Larry?
@@allenlindsey1175 How did he go with the motion?
@@interestedobserver587 follow the case and see jelly roll.
@@allenlindsey1175 So you dont know?
This is what happens when Judges are appointed who are NOT EQUIPPED TO BE A JUDGE!
I just seen this Video but I ABSOLUTELY LOVE this attorney!!
@the DUI guy +
👍Ugh... This judge has an ego issue that is very frustrating. She is also not honest or informed about this law. I'm sure she fought tooth and nail to keep control over this case. It is very hard to not speak up when someone is not listening and understanding what you are trying to say. Good for you standing up to her.💪
#FreeEricBrandt💔
Her first words were literally "I'm going to interrupt you."