Watch A DUI Attorney Flawlessly Dismantle a [Suspected] Coached Police Officer for the Prosecution
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 มี.ค. 2021
- DUI defense attorney Larry Forman cross-examines a cop who charged his client with a DUI and the cop was suspected to have been coached prior to questioning. Watch this video to find out what happens during this DUI trial!
March 9, 2016
Hardin County, KY
The Prosecutor's Direct Examination: 1:04
The DUI Guy's Cross Examination: 15:03
Judge: Honorable Kimberly Winkenhofer Shumate, Hardin County District Court Division I
Defense attorney: Larry Forman, a.k.a. the DUI Guy
Prosecutor: Philip Moore
Arresting Officer: Officer M. Sutherland, Radcliff Police Department
Subscribe to this channel to watch a criminal defense attorney in action:
/ @theduiguyplus
NEED TO BEAT A DUI ? I CAN BE YOUR DUI DEFENSE LAWYER, TOO.
Call 502-931-6788 OR
Schedule an appointment with me: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforman
Let's work to beat your DUI case!
Connect With the DUI Guy:
Website: larryformanlaw.com/
Facebook: / kyduiguy
Twitter: / kyduiguy
Linkedin: / formanlarry
#criminaldefenseattorney #DUIlawyer #duiguy
Like how he slowed waaaaay down. 😂 repeating the question.
Funny how if they pull you over that they talk that fast, but have the same issue as everybody else when its done to them.
Odd huh? I've got loads of cops in my family. Federal, state, as well as city cops. At our reunions, their stories of the b.s. they do is fkn scandalous.
Seriously want to tape a few and send em in. I'm afraid a few of my family members might dig a small hole..........
No joke.
@@truethought2581 what are you even talking about? 🙄
@@douglasd327 corruption.... I'll sssslllloooowwwwwwwww ddddooooowwwwnnnnnn for you. Put the pipe down and try to keep up.
@@truethought2581 cops still dig holes like that?
Sounds is like a personal issue @True Thought which is a non issue in this instance
It's amazing how cops have a photographic memory when it suits them and alzheimers when it doesn't
In my perfect world, The cure for the cop’s Alzheimer’s just hit court rooms across America. It’s called perjury. Some cops break out in handcuffs 🤣
They are all scumbags. Stay away from crooks
I wanna see cops like these hang on a rope and have the public watch and enjoy. Id enjoy it with some popcorn.
They make up a lot of shit, too.
She kept slipping in the magic "I can't recall" for good measure... 😂
I work construction and have to keep better records of the work done day in and day out than a cop has to take evidence to ruin someone’s life
thats sad but i gaurantee so true
You're being held to account because you cost money to the contractor, if you don't move your ass, it's costing more and the project runs less profit or none at all.
A cop does not suffer the same oversight by his or her superiors, because daddy government will protect them and they don't seem to mind if it costs a bit more or not.
@@AwoudeX yea and who pays for it???? The tax cattle........we have got to STAND up to our tyrannical government stealing our hard earned money BEFORE it's too late.
@@dusteedawg2915 preaching to the choir are we? ;)
You don’t think these officers are trying to railroad good citizens to charge them with DUI’s, do you? Drunk driving is a leading cause of Death in this a country. These Deaths are preventable. Because politicians and rich people do it there is little to no punishment other than fines that hurt poor people most. Who’s Life is ruined over DUI charges even if they’re false?
Even when prosecutors don't coach police, police often coach themselves. And not just for testimony.
There was an incident where a department officer created a template for warrant applications. It included a collection of statements that should go into a warrant, including language pulled directly from court precedent on what is required. And many of the officers used it.
This was discovered when a rookie with less than a year on the force (or any police job) applied for a warrant, and it stated "In my 5 years of experience in drug interdiction..."
Hahahahahahaha
Brilliant
Dumb as a box of frogs
🤣🤣😂✌️✌️✌️
Yoooooo REALLY?!?? Do you have a link?
🤣🤣🤣😭
Hilarious!
It's funny how cops can never remember anything when they are in court.
thus why everything is on video now. So citizens can't say the cops did something they didn't but also so the cops can't just get away with anything. This is why i am for all police of all kinds in the USA having body cams on all the time. With no off button. That would have been good evidence in this court but of course it is always fought against by police unions. It is easy to get an audio/video camera of 2160p into a phone. Using the same tech plus a M.2 drive you have in your computer you can store an entire 24 hour day locally with decent HD audio. Maybe not 256 speaker point surround sound by the audio you get with a modern phone. So it can it can be done. It will cost a little to do for both storage and custom made body cameras. A 2160p photo can be used to ID basically anyone on facebook with the correct software. It is kind of propriety to facebook and i am sure they will not want to share.
I don't recall
How good are you remembering? She remembered well, enough...so what if she talked with the prosecution...that is expected...the defense attorney's job is to create doubt...i suffered through this video expecting some serious malfeasance...major disappointment...she could of done better, but i give her a pass...alcohol tests are a timed event...they need to be taken immediately...you are either entering intoxication or coming out of it...that is my problem with this video...
@@georgvonsauer2618 My memory is not very good all thus why my comment was about video cameras every where including always on police body cams.
I bet she would remember if the questions were to incriminate the defendant
FOR A COP SHE SURE DOESNT REMEMBER MUCH,, I THINK SHE NEEDS A BODY CAM TO HELP HER MEMORY
Just to jumpstart it huh?🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Shes a Democrat. They never remember or know anything
I like body cams. They keep everyone honest.
Try remembering something a year ago that lasted 20 minutes at your job.
just be a republican and lie,
It's amazing how many things cops "can't recall" when questioned by defense attorneys, but remember everything to the letter when asked by the prosecution.
They are allowed to lie.. Look it up
@gene and aj not in court, they are allowed to lie to the public. The courts allow them to lie without consequence.
The prosecutor reached out to her, and the only thing they discussed was the fact that they shouldn’t discuss the case?? Yeah, that’s believable.
@@interestedparty00 the one thing she seemed to remember perfectly.
Just like criminals and scammed.
I watched the video twice, I must have missed the part where the officer was “flawlessly dismantled” 🤦♂️
I'm glad someone said what I was thinking😂
lol agreed.
They said prosecution if I’m not mistaken
You are mistaken. They say an officer "for the prosecution" meaning she was a witness for the prosecution, but they are claiming to have "dismantled" the officer herself
Then maybe you should watch it one more time. And if you still don't get it, then actually read the comments so you don't embarASS... YOURSELF..
The way she answers some of the questions before the questions have been fully asked is a big red flag she's been coached
She and the prosecutor didn't talk about the case, yet she remembered the exact answer to every single prosecutor question but couldn't remember anything the defense wanted to ask about. Sure, that seems normal LOL
From the UK and same happens over here. I was at a trial where an officer answered all the prosecutor questions in detail, but the answer to every single defence question was 'I don't remember'. The Defence solicitor final question was "You seem to remember so little about the whole case, how do you know you were even there"? The officer answered "It was in the log".
If your on trial to ruin somebody's life and 1 of the 2 officers present at the apartment and on the dui stop she should start remembering 1 fuckin thing or she shouldn't be a credible witness
@@peterb2272 that’s because when being asked question lawyers usually tell you to say I can’t recall or remember to avoid crossing stories and creating bs
@@peterb2272 "In the log" is referring to the facts of the case that they jot down on their journals. Its possible to remember facts of the case if you write them down at the time of or shortly after the altercation so you don't forget. Getting cross examined you don't naturally know the answer at the top of your head. Some of these questions from the opposition are very specific and since you cannot lie in court, you are forced to say "I can't recall".
@@roughryder5 And the reason the defence was asking questions is that,. bizarrely enough, everything the defendant had said in his defence was not written down. Where the witness admitted assault was not written down. The only 'facts' the officer 'remembered' was what the prosecution used in court. All the 'facts' the defendant said which would have been used in his defence were not written down and not remembered. i.e. "she was assaulting me so I pushed here away to stop the assault" was written down as "he admitted to assaulting her". When you cant rely on the officer to write down or remember all the pertinent facts, but only those facts that help the prosecution, where do you go from there?
The Intoxilyzer 5000...sounds like something you'd hear from a RoboCop movie.
Or phineas and ferb
I’d buy that for a dollar 😜
Futurama
@@fanenthusiast3802 wa
A ratchet and clank game
Watching cops in court makes me realize just how little cops actually know about the law.
Well that’s 23 minutes I’m never getting back
The defense lawyer was blocking the view of the DA so that he could not give any approval clues to the officer.
Just the idea of that stand been mobile is stupid enough to understand.
Ya think
Nice move
@@EddieDuranLLC you talking above the movement of the stand? 😂
I picked up on that too, it's not what you see it's what you hear in this instance.
She investigated herself and found no wrong doing.
@Rey DeGuerra She also declared herself a hero!
@@robstone5333 And the defendent a villian
Sounds like Jeremy Dewitte
your typical woman.
Lol, I was gonna write that 👍🏻🤓
I used to work for a deputy and the stories he told were RIDICULOUS! If we did a fraction of what they did from the stories I was told we would be in prison for A LONG TIME💯He even said that they would mess with the prisoners that were schizophrenic by speaking into the vent saying they were ‘god’ and told them to do so horrible stuff! The DUI stories were RIDICULOUS....getting pulled over multiple times and getting escorted home. Most of the stories I can’t repeat on here because of YT guidelines so you can only imagine how depraved they were! The thing that is BS is they all think the stories are funny! Just like that pinned comment...I wish I recorded some of them but I would’ve ended up in some BS if I did💯
That’s horrible.. especially the prisoner part. Like I bet a lot of those mentally ill prisoners shouldn’t even be in prison, and instead should be getting mental health helpd
OMG HE HAD ME ROLLING WHEN HE VERY VERY VERY SLOWLY REPEATED THE QUESTION!! 😂🤣 Omg I'm crying
How do you forget who you talk to but remember a whole conversation and you’re on duty sober?
Spidey sense.
Selective memory
It's just a common cop tactic of lying but saying just enough to discredit you without actually breaking any rules
Much of the time, cops responding to a routine noise complaint don't need the name of the person they spoke with.
@@oxide9679 LOL 😂 you just proved exactly what the problem is with police ..... LOL TO GET THE NAME OR FORGET THE NAME (not ask at all) ....THAT IS THE QUESTION?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 if that is legal procedure police need to stop harassing people for unnecessary info.
“Excuse me I can’t see the witness...I need to have eye contact when she gets her story screwed up....”
🤣🤣🤣
That part...😂🤣😂👌🏿
And then he moves like 4 inches. Lol
What part of her story was “screwed up”?
Duuuude, that’s suspicious as fuck. That’s exactly what popped into my mind when I heard the prosecutor say that.
Man your channel starting blowing up! I remember when you first started out
They can't recall anything but expects the public to be able too.
They don't know the law half the time, but expect the public to know it.
I have also watched quite a bit of body cam footage, cops have horrible short term memories... They always remember the last 30 min very differently than what the camera actually recorded... 🤔
A good lawyer only asks question he already knows the answer. Thats the first rule of cross examination.
A little more to that is, the defence lawyer moulds the questions in a way to get the desired response they are expecting and to be advantageous to the defence.
@@davidpetruic9557 Bingo Dave!
Not true. A lawyer can ask a question they might not know the answer to if it serves to force the witness into contradicting themselves.
@@Jupiter1423 I wasn’t giving a blanket answer of course there are other types of questions to serve the lawyers purpose
@@Jupiter1423 and even with regards to your statement if the attorney is seeking for the witness to contradict themselves then they have an excellent idea of how they are steering the question to get the desired response.
The first thing that they learn at training school are the words "I don't remember, I don't recall ". Yet they expect the defendant to remember everything.
No they don't
@Mario Perich if you can even get the video. 🤦
And if you can't actually PROVE something you're disbelieved. But they can straight up legally lie.
Yeah otherwise they are a liar even if they are severely traumatized.
Werent those Hillary Clinton's answers too?
These videos are really cool to watch. Ever since watching the Depp V Heard trial I’ve been obsessed with watching attorneys I think this is great. Please more!! More!!! More!!! 😂
DUI guy, it would be really helpful if there was some actual explanation of what exactly the critical points were that led to success. You put these videos up and often there is insufficient explanation of exactly what is going on strategically and tactically, which drastically diminishes their usefulness
The man refers to himself in 3rd person, and provides in his bio a dozen links of the multiple different awards that he received. This is as good as it gets.
YES!!!! I totally agree with you. Kind of why I stopped watching his uploads TBH
We don't know that there WAS a success.
It would be helpful and interesting given that most of us are "civilians" with little to no knowledge of HOW the law is applied.
..it would indeed be helpful, but I get it, this guy is a working lawyer, NOT a full time YTber so I can't imagine he has a lot of time to add more details, edit more info into his videos. What he does include is still pretty effective in illustrating the point of each video and where the DUI arrest/officer went wrong.
She was definitely coached. She remembered to many details right off the top of her head.
Right! But at the same time couldn't recall anything pertaining to the defense's questioning. It's so obvious that she's full of shit. From her on up to the top. (Prosecution) "smh" but it's not what ya know. It's what you can prove
She should keep a notebook which she can read before, and she can refer to during the questioning. I didn’t see her refer to a notebook btw.
Police write reports of their interactions, they can review these records before testifying
@@saberint hi, some jurisdictions don't allow notes on the stand bc hearsay.
Seems like an odd reason but it's their policy.
@@bsqwahlE thanks for that Bea :) sounds weird but so be it. For us the notebook isn’t taken as verbatim, but it does help keep the order of how the incident occurred. After all, it’s still up to the jury how they interpret the information.
"Haveyou.........had..........any..........conversation...........with...........the prosecutor? "
Sooooo satisfying!!!!
Eh. It may be for us, but juries don’t like it a lot. A few do, but I talk to jurors for a living and they don’t like attorneys who are condescending out of the gate.
@@carolsh1983 but they're ok with lying cops for the most part. Funny
@@notallowed337 Sadly, they often are.
@@carolsh1983 wanna feel like they're helping. Sheople mentality
16:04 for context
Everytime the dudes lawyer said 'objection' killed me 😂
As a former practicing physician (who had to document everything), I continue to be astounded by how little seemingly- important info Officers routinely document. Sometime, can you dedicate an episode to who sets these standards where? Also, how they differ with v without body cam? Hopefully, the standards aren't lower if more than 1 Officer is present.
I would think that, if nothing else, their liability insurance &/or consulting attys would require better documentation(?).
It's almost like the became cops to avoid all the reading and writing college would entail.
It's a totally different profession and type of documentation, police reports cover extremely dynamic, random and depthful situations, medical reports are specific to just that, I bet if I looked at any medical report there would still be information that's lacking. Also she doesn't have the report on her in the stand, so even if she did write something as trivial as, how mamy cars are in the parking lot? She wouldn't remember it because she would have wrote it down, if she didn't write it down then it wasn't relevant or worth noting.
That because cop reports are full of standardized questions with pre completed “correct” answers to check off or select and narrative prompts.
Police are trained on reports scripted to produce the record they want and
“if you don’t write it in the report, then you can’t prove it happened.”
That only sounds like good advice to honest people…
@@MISTAKEWASMADE4live Another Doc here. Lol! You have no idea what our standards of documentation are, but I can honestly say that if you read a medical report, you’d get the patient’s name, sex, dob, presenting issue, reason for exam, radiology, labs, pathology, surgical, pharmacological, consultation, and a brief H&P. You would have a reasonable ability to discern what medical conditions the patient was experiencing regardless of the department.
We ask detailed questions and we direct quote statements from the patient and their family if necessary. We also directly quote information received from other medical personnel such as nurses, technicians, pharmacists, other doctors, labs, radiologists reports, surgical reports, MARS, Allergies, medications, medical history, vital signs, I&O’s, weight, current medical conditions, POC, treatments, results, and recommends. This is just a list of the basics of documentation we use for each patient. We don’t get to make shit up on the fly in a court of law. The documentation that law enforcement agencies use is vague, selective, impressionistic, opinionated, and biased. Without direct quotes from the individual and witnesses, along with names, descriptions, or information specifically related to the inquiry, it is easy to surmise how so much confusion could be introduced into a court case. I know some officers are as meticulous as surgeons with their documentation; while others have the documentation skills of a brand new nursing assistant. I know nursing assistants with fabulous documentation skills but their documentation is limited by their scope of practice. My point is that there appears to be a marked difference in educational standards across law enforcement agencies. I’m curious if there is a standardized set of standards in law enforcement. If not, then there should be. Also, how much education do officers provide the citizens they arrest or detain? Do they just give them paperwork with standard legal terms? And if so, do they provide definitions to explain such terminology?
Their liability insurance is probably much less than yours as a physician due to qualified immunity shielding them from civil suits.
2 weeks DUI training. Zero hours critical thinking.
The training is arrest them and let the courts figure it out....dont worry you'll get overtime🤣🤣🤣
@@wadewalton4017 bingo
@TakeDeadAim Lmao it takes months to become a police officer boor licker. They don’t even know the fucking laws they enforce.
@TakeDeadAim yeah your name says it all
🤣🤣
When he brought the podium 4 feet from her face to start the questioning I felt that..and she clearly felt it too.
😹😹😹😹
Awesome move
I SEEN IT ON HER FACE
Then the defense attorney proceeded to not raise a single shred of doubt about her testimony.
Loved it
Why do all court cameras have the resolution of a 2002 Motorola Razr
Enjoyed seeing u in action
She says she was an investigator at some point but yet has a hard time remembering so much detail!
@Marten Dekker Of course!
“Investigations” with the Military Police. From my personal experiences with MP’s, they usually handle very easy cases, and can usually figure them out easily. Any crazy investigations that have to be performed are turned over the the FBI or CID
@@dylanbradley7583 IME, MP's are more chill than civilian police. In both DUI stops (I wasn't driving), they seemed mainly concerned about getting us back to our units safely.
@@davidmuth4571 yea no doubt. I’m just saying her form of experience was working with the MP’s, when in reality all MP’s do is conduct traffic stops all day and never really do anything crazy
@@davidmuth4571 I use to get drunk in Kaneohe Bay Hawaii when in the marines and call the MPs to my friends house to take me home, they always abliged. free taxi (there werent ubers then)
I liked when he moved the podium up close, the police officer thought everything else in the room suddenly became more interesting.
My grandfather was a criminal defense attorney in Vandalia, IL with a full time practice until age 92. (Previously, he had been an assistant Illinois State Attorney and also had been elected as a State Representative for ten years.) I only saw him in court once when he was appointed by the Court to be the defense attorney for a drunk driver. I watched him get a state trooper (not a bad cop, actually a very nice good cop) so mixed up he didn't know whether he was coming or going. If you ever think you can match wits with somebody skilled at cross examination, good luck.
Or pass a field sobriety test given by a skill fabricator facts who are rewarded for their number of DUI arrests.
Anyone else found it interesting that the prosecutor complained he couldn't see the officer? I suspect him giving her visual cues and that lawyer was testing it. This defense lawyer is a boss!
Boss indeed!
Lolol shush let us work ... When we cross our leg and go silent ... Let em talk (: all earsss buddy . Im next 😉
@@ryaneccles4546 Was that supposed to make any sense at all? 🥴
@@Name-oz4lq it does .. comprehension issue more than likely 😊
@@ryaneccles4546 I don’t think it’s a comprehension issue at all, what are you trying to say lol you pretending you’re a lawyer or something?
*HAVE...........YOU...........HAD......ANY...........DISCUSSION.......WITH.........THE........PROSECUTOR*
I had an evil giggle when that happened 😂
Reminds me of the sloth from Zootopia
I could have swore she said yes I have and he told me not to talk about what happened there lmao
When I heard him say that I knew he was about to go in on the officer 🤣
She asked him to repeat it so she could have a few more seconds to think of how to word the answer without incriminating herself.
Lol I loved it!
What was the outcome of the case? This didn't seem to accomplish much towards an acquittal.
Omg her responses to the jury give off some serious amber heard vibes!
When he speaks slower to her lol just killed me.
He had major guts to do that
That could be grounds for objection for harassing a witness
Yet it was silly and the fact she asked him to repeat the question was reasonable since his initial question was interrupted.
Yeah it was poor character on his part
I think it seemed rude and for little reason. He should let his questioning shine rather than take that route.
70% of the questions asked:
"I don't remembeeeerrr....hmmmm I don't recaaaaallllll...."🤣🤣🤣
Another way of saying I plead the fifth!
The "republican" way you mean I'm sure..... 😐
@@aquabone8118 the dem way you mean. Nice try though bud 👍
Is her last name Clinton?
Sounded like Hillary Clinton ...
Watching these videos is so interesting. Thanks Larry
When your Memory Turns on and off depending who's asking the question
I love when they drag the podium righttttt up close. Boss fight music starts playing lmao
Bro I'm picturing the music at the end of the very first Castlevania. So funny and you are so right
😂😂😂😂
The lawyer should be charged with murder, I watched him kill that cop on the stand.
Were you watching the same video I was?
SkinnyCow -Can't you tell she is mildly challenged.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@tonnyhar72 -It's a disgrace what they did to this lady officer.
Muahahahahaha
😎👍
It would be great to know how these cases turn out. I've watched several but don't see the results.
I want my time back 🤦♂️
The tell tale sign of that officer lying is when she over explained the question as to whether or not she'd talked to the prosecuting attorney.
Exactly
Yup it’s called copsplaining!
Yup. She’s a downright liar and the whole USA cop squad is full of them. Same as here in England. Selective memory is a requirement for joining the cops.
@@kevvome well said, spot on. 👍
@Whitney Cheated Exactly. She put the noose around her own neck by giving what she thought was a clever answer.
No wonder I have never trusted a cop.
As a former medical-legal transcriptionist, I want to know why the hell this audio is so damn clear and why no one is talking into their armpit while eating potato chips.
why bother censoring the cops name? They deserve their identities to be broadcast far and wide.
Exactly. They should be public.
Its funny that the lawyer keeps saying objection, but nobody even acknowledges it lol
And how lies the problem with law enforcement in this country. She still has a job I’m sure. As a cop once your credibility is shot you should be fired on the spot.
And "here" lies the problem. Just saying. :)
There would be no cops.
Or attorneys
Or Judges
@@randolphtolbert3825 good get rid of them all. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Its incredible the way the world works. The police always seem to only remember what benefits the prosecution.
They only remember what will benefit the prosecution because it goes on their record, the more they have the faster they move up in pay scale and rank. It's like any other job except they don't bat an eye at destroying someone's future
Absolute embarrassment for a first world nation. Saudi royal family guards act with greater restrictions and oversight.
NOT the world! Only in police states like the U.S.A.
Defund the police...
WE Already know which side they are on..
@@gsmithstudio1 - That's not the solution, either. They need to be held PERSONALLY responsible financially instead of the city paying lawsuits over their misconduct. Believe me, if it was their ass on the line, they would be a lot more careful.
I once handled my own case in an accident with another driver. The cop and the other dudes attorney went through this performance where the cop actually at one point said oh, yes, now I recall I noticed the brake lights were on and working. The accident happened because the other guys brake lights and blinkers were not working. I objected to the judge that I wasn't given the script the other attorney and the cop were reading from and told the judge I'm not sure what my lines were in this fiction. I ended up winning despite never being in a court case before. A rare case where a judge also saw through the cop lies.
Summary of this case: Cop: 'you will be arrested if you dont go home' (citizen going home) 'you are under arrest for DUI'...
“The Intoxalyzer 5000 EN” sounds like a good name for a beer bong
No shit, sounds like something from a National Lampoon movie from the '80s!
Rob zombie's album
Sounds like a robot chick that Bender would date
Did someone say bong? 🔥🤣🔥💭
This is not a jokeing matter .! But yo pass that beword
I love the DUI guy. He’s like a ninja lawyer in the courtroom.
What is that supposed to mean?
Really he did not seem very competent to me. He couldn’t pivot when he mis-phased a question and the objection was sustained. And did not advance his defence at all with the entire line of questioning.
I would love to see him argue with his kids they would never win lol.
So, by your definition, ninjas are mildly incompetent, lose their fights, and accomplish nothing. Interesting...
Defense. It is spelled defense. Jesus, help us all.
I have read maybe 10 replies with people clueless of the fact this lawyer cleaned the floor with this cop, mentioning they "don't get it," and the lawyer didn't outsmart the cop at all, etc. Comically misspelling the word defense, over and over again. Thank God for a trial by jury, but it is absolutely terrifying to know some of these people are sitting on a jury somewhere. 😳
Fuck sake. Just fuck sake.
Please think before breeding.
If you can't spell defense and you missed the extremely obvious of this video, just cut it off or out. Please.
ITS THE PODIUM MOVE 0.2 CM AFTER HE SAYS HE CANT SEE FOR ME 🤣🤣🤣 sorry but that was just funny, it was like “do you really need to? You gunna mouth the words to her?”
I would love to see the outcome video for this case.
when son moved tht podium up, u jus' knew it was 'bout to get hot. 😂
exactly. it was at that point that you knew she was f'ked
And then the defense was shredded to pieces. Nice podium power play, though.
@@christopherwharton6022 ah no it wasn’t
And yet it didn’t. She easily handled him. It was just basic questioning.
@@jimhall5472 easily 😂😂😂 Did you not noticed that she barely look him in the eye? He question her and she talks and looks 2 her right...
The fact that she first said she heard the guy say everyone needs to go, then under the criss exam say she didn't hear that. 😂
It was something to that effect. Something = whatever gets the driver in trouble.
This says March 19, 2016 in the description. Are any of these videos updated with the court outcome?
Oh my God 'law enforcement' in the US attracts the most evil, malicious, dishonest, monsters. How many innocent lives has she ruined?
No she didn't, she went to the house because they were harassing their neighbors by blasting music at 3AM and then after they couldn't have their the defendant decided to drive under the influence so he was arrested as he should, he even popped on the breathalyzer so he has no defense.
Way too many
Oh OK Mr Indenial.. Citing a person that's drunk and driving is NOT ruining their life.. It's saving people's lives by getting drunks of the roads that simply aren't responsible drinkers.
@@Oneness100 this must be her burner account trying to put a positive spin on here selective memory 🤣🤣🤡
@@Oneness100 drinking and driving is fine and fun
The jury got the message: She was actively forcing people into a situation where they would get arrested for loitering or driving drunk.
She was not doing anyone a favor by not ticketing for the noise complaint. She was going for a bigger jackpot. She wanted to set people up so that they had no choice but to drive away immediately and get cited for DWI. She is a monster! Instead of helping the public, she was actively causing a public safety hazard. All so she can make some arrests!
Shameful!
Oh so responsible drinking and not driving afterwards is her fault. They could have called a cab and she couldn't have done anything then. Yes 100% she and her actions are shameful I won't disagree on that but people are absolute idiots if they think getting in their car after drinking at a party that cops show up to, to make everyone go home, is a good idea. That's on them.
Thats pretty much entrapment...and cops 👮♂️ 👮♀️ 🚔 do it all the time!
@@MegaDiannah Cops most likely told them they had to leave.
Ever heard of calling a taxi? Uber? Lyft? Or walking home? How about doing the smart thing and just flat not driving to a party you know you are going to be drinking at without a designated driver. Nope, its got to be the cop’s fault, right?
@Unga Bunga PePe Not always. If court is during your duty shift, you just get paid your normal rate.
Anyone else just skip to the cross examination?
Of course! I ain't got time to waste on bullshit
Yep
Was down here looking for a time stamp actually. I really wish the channel would edit the darn thing so it convey what it needs to without all the extra baloney.
...I actually really enjoy watching court hearings, so I did not
15:03
Always suspect when they give long winded explanations to simple questions that require simple answers. That's a sign of a nervous cover up.
Man, Law and Order, among many other courtroom dramas, make these scenes seem so much more lively and enjoyable.
1st. Question should be, have you ever lied while on duty when handling a suspect.
Frazier v. Cupp as the case permitting police deception during interrogations.
Cops are permitted to lie....to a defendant. Not to his boss, or his mom, or his wife, or under oath.
So the answer to the first question, would be YES, I have occasionally lied while conducting interviews of suspected law breakers. Nothing wrong with that.
@@roberthothan227 yes but if you’re lucky and cop doesn’t know they can lie to get information from a suspect they might lie about lying, which in court becomes perjury.
@@McSurviveGuys objection you tube lawyer.. That's entrapment.
@@McSurviveGuys if youre lucky.. you think a cop doesnt know that?
@@cidizzle 🤣🤣🤣
Ahh yes...police and their "selective" memories. This is why they all need to wear bodycams and be charged if they turn them off while on duty and why you need to record them, all the time, every interaction.
what if they have to take a fat shit?
no, not every interaction, that screws over our privacy
@@phanx0m924 If the cops are in your home without a warrant we have bigger problems. And your home is the only place you get expected privacy.
@@phanx0m924 the only time it would screw your privacy is if they are violating the law…. Which you would want recorded…
Who is going to pay for the storage costs of high-quality video? If you all want this, you better be willing to pay for it. Which means a fuxk ton more police spending. I doubt you will be okay with spending the kind of money that is needed for the kind of police force you say you want. Bitching online to look good is easy though.
If I were a juror in that case and the defense attorney pulled that shit when asked to repeat the question, one word for every 2 seconds...The only thing he would have accomplished is to make me think he's an A-hole...
Exactly. Larry is one of the least self-aware individuals I have ever encountered.
How long were the proceedings for this case postponed(moved to another date) before the actual court date, anyone know?
Me: Waiting for "THE GOOD PART"
Video: *Fizzles and goes out with a whimper
Me: "OoOoOo, It's one of those videos" *Pretends to know what happened
Haha I thought the same thing
Yeah exactly
My exact thoughts too.
Lmao. He moved the stand to block any visual contact between officer and prosecutor. Epic move.
If I was on the jury and only hearing this testimony, I would vote guilty. Nothing that happened at the house was relevant. Not the amount of cars or what was said or who opened the door. (The fact that the defendant was at the party had no baring on whether he was intoxicated.) If she had come from a different scene her answers would have carried the same weight...none. Nothing at the scene of the accident made a bit of difference, she wasn't the first at the scene, she didn't watch the field sobiety test, and very little was said about it. The only thing that matter and wasn't refuted at all was when she gave the defendant the breathalizer test. She said she watched the defendant for 20 minutes, that he didn't eat/drink anything that he didn't 'vomit'. That the device she knew how to use and it was properly callibrated. The defendant blew a 1.31. That is the only fact that matters, thus the defendant was guilty.
It's funny how many times she says "I don't recall", "I don't remember", "I don't know".
One thing I never understood about drunk drivers is, how is it they are legally unable to drive but legally able to be advised of their rights?
Apparently, a lot of people don't actually know their Miranda rights.
Part of it is "Any statement you make may be used against you in a court of law."
My point was most intoxicated people are blathering idiots and will admit to anything at all with the slightest nudge. I just think this is a legal grey area police use to get easy convictions.
I under no circumstances believe driving while intoxicated is a good thing.
In fact I don't even drink at all.
exactly ! Most of the time depending on how drunk they are or whatever else they be on they won’t remember how everything happened!
Being over the drink-drive limit is just a proscribed limit. In the UK the drink-drive limit is 35 micrograms per 100ml of breath but in Scotland, it's 22. Therefore it can be illegal to drive in Scotland, but cross an imaginary line on the road into England and it's ok.
if you are too intoxicated to understand your rights then you are too intoxicated to drive ...
@@grassCrow no shit sherlock. His point is the other way around. If you are to intoxicated to drive, how do they expect that you are not to intoxicated to understand your rights..?
@@5calambres I clearly understand his point. But the point is really counterproductive and a misunderstanding of miranda rights. As soon as you try to argue that you were too drunk to understand your rights ... you lose. But go ahead, go to court and make that argument ... LOL.
The attitude right off the rip from her against the defense attorney is amazing. She's heard all about him.
It's not the officer's obligation to make the defense attorney's job a cakewalk. He started off very condescending with her when he slowly and patronizingly repeated the question to her as if she was stupid and slow to comprehend. Any attitude she displayed after that was fostered by the attorney.
@@SilentKnight43. Don’t defend her, bro. That bitch’s whole career was built on condescension and impropriety. She is not only a poor excuse for an officer, but a poor excuse for a human being.
@@SilentKnight43 she heard the question she was asked but decided to make the attorney repeat himself. She brought the attitude upon herself.
@@SilentKnight43 and yet she fell right into his trap. She was NOT in charge now was she.
@@SilentKnight43 Lol give ya head a wobble woman. Officer wanna play with the big boys tried to mug him off with the very first question and learned very quickly. She should be in the kitchen making Bacon Sanger's and getting more cold ones.
I got my (unfortunately not 1st) dui 2.5 years ago. Cop (who wasn’t even in duty anymore, just happened to be there) lied about me “hitting” him. My POS lawyer didn’t even try to investigate the charge and I was coerced into a disgusting “treatment” program to get it dropped (almost a year after I had quit drinking). The police had footage of everything except, you guessed it, my “hitting” of the officer. Sound familiar? I complained to the state bar about the mishandling of my case but unfortunately nothing will come of it. Police and prosecutors can ruin peoples lives with their lies and are never held accountable.
Can someone help me? What did he specifically do to "dismantle" her coached testimony? I watched it, but missed it. Thanks!
As every soldier knows: To spell Whimp you need a MP.
oh shit ..lol
That’s not how spell wimp though, brah.
@@justinv6410 anybody who speaks with brah or bro knows Jack shit...
HooAh All the Way! Airborne MP!
Wimp..Whimpen.. Whimp
As every soldier knows: you are not a soldier!
After every answer she looks at the senior officer seated for approval ...Coached for sure ! The prosecution lawyer gets pissed when he can't see and coach her
Negative...she’s looking and talking directly to the jury. She mopped the floor with that incompetent defense attorney.
@@detgarcia there is no jury that I can see.
However, she also isn't looking at any officer either. She does turn to look at the DUI lawyer though when he asks questions.
@@detgarcia kiss them boots 🥾
@@kianaone2610 you cannot see the jury because they are not allowed to be filmed
Your statement is sustained
I like how he says “judge” instead of “your honor”
I bet a lot of cadets do actually want to do the right thing but end up getting corrupted by other cops and politics.
Good police work probably gets swept right under the rug.
You are so right about that.
Possibly a mixture of factors. Firstly, the brightest minds go to university, not the police academy. Secondly there’s a good chance that many people choose to join the police simply because of the power over others they expect to get. Many inherently bad people will have an above average desire to become cops. So you already end up with plenty of below average candidates in terms of intelligence and morals; the rest become corrupted later. The very few who are genuinely good and resist the corruption are bullied out of the job by the ones who don’t.
Not to sound too offensive, oh who am I kidding, full offense intended, but no police department in America wants smart and educated people working for them.
They want the scum sticking to the bottom of the barrel: college wash-outs too stupid to get through the first semester, dumb muscle headed idiots, and people with power fantasies who are more likely than not racist pieces of shit.
The average IQ for the average cop is usually in the low to mid 90’s, which is lower than the national average, so that should tell you something. Also, as recently as 2000, a man named Robert Jordan, who applied to become a cop was barred from being one because he scored too HIGH on his test. They literally didn’t want him because he was too smart, and they figured “He would get bored and leave after the costly training”.
In other words; he’d be smart enough to realize just how corrupt and stupid the other cops are, and he might’ve posed a threat to their established order of corruption and extortion.
@@SuperHuscarl Derek Chauvin had a college degree and still murdered George Floyd on the streets of Minneapolis. They just don't care, even if they have the brains.
as an ex-MP, wouldn't she know that it is grossly inappropriate for a witness to talk to the prosecution during a trial ?
Wow.. like mistrial in the public sector
MPs don’t generally have to concern themselves with the law or constitution. Active duty troops have no rights.
They want to screw this guy as bad as possible, of course they rehearsed every word spoken back and forth! There is no justice in the justice system, they just want to rob citizens of every dollar they can, screw the public’s rights, they want $$$$
DAs regularly talk to witnesses, what are you even talking about. you people are too blinded by your hate to be reasonable at this point.
Not necessarily, the military uniform code treats the criminal investigation and prosecution process significantly differently than civilian law.
"I was in the military and now I have PTSD...I guess i better come back home and be a cop."
She had perfect memory about any information that justified the charge. She couldn't remember anything else.
Those that serve injustice have a special place in hell.
if only ...
Adventures of James
I'd sacrifice my left testicle to see what would happen to these lowlives and then loudly laugh in their face. Get back in my special vehicle and gtfo of there.
@@NotXboxiie life is short so you'll see for yoursellf lol
It’s funny how they seem to ONLY remember other people’s actions.... not their own🤔
A cop is just a person. Many people are like that. Supporting someone who was DUI and still finding a way to blame cops says a lot about you and morals. People who drive like that do not care about others
@@OGC558 no, most people are not like that. They can remember their own actions just as well as anything else that happens. It's irrelevant whether this is in the context of a DUI trial or not.
@@Tom_Het not when the trial is a year after the incident...but people seem to not understand that
@@OGC558 so....the prosecuturs are allowed to do this same thing to you.....but a defense attorney can't do it to them? Yeah....seems legit....😑
@@mirrormonstere113 do what? Ask questions during trial? Do you understand the difference between the two lawyers? Lol
What is this about? The officer ordering them to leave to set up a DUI trap?
Excuse me for being dense, but what was the dismantling? What did he disprove?
Cops can’t remember anything in court but can write a 500+ word essay on what the suspect did after they arrived on the scene 😭
But when your adeneline is rushing through your head.. of course your memory isnt going to be exact, isnt that the exact reason why eye witness testimonies are pretty much useless.. You try walking in the grocery store and then when you get out I surprise you with a question about what color the shirt is of the 5th person you walked past.
@@xFersureMatt I’m legally blind
@@DavidGonzalez-bn4gw okay?
@@xFersureMatt I can see that
The real story here is that he cornered her into a position where she couldn't really refute the allegation of her comments. He kept working her answer on how many police officers were present on the scene. Now he has more witnesses than she does as to what she said and did on scene.
BINGO! 💯
Exactly what they do to us in the world/court.
explain more please
@@bigjoe6651 there were lets say 30 people at the party they were breaking up who all have the same statement of X,Y,&Z over the 2 cops that were on scene. She can't come back and say it was 3 party goers and 7 cops on scene.
That's what lawyers do my guy.
Great job with the side bar audio
After watching the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial…boy do I know my objections! I called speculation well before the prosecutor did. I feel so educated lol.
If I told my boss "I don't recall" i'd be terminated for gross negligence.
Food processing.
Yet our law enforcement... who are armed with weapons and, most importantly, THE EMBODIMENT OF THE STATE, can say it.
Aight. Totally legit.
i mean not really a good comparison to compare the recollection of your job when you do the same thing every day compared to a cop trying to recall specific details of ONE call a year later. its not the ethics or performance of her job she doesnt recall its details of a case. a minor case at that. no telling how many calls this girl has gone on since that DUI.
@@cutthroatgaming6722
Yeah guess what, it's called writing it down.
That's what documentation is for. I produce millions of units - anything that has my sign off is my responsibility - NO EXCUSES.
A DUI can ruin lives, these cops don't care. I hope mr foreman keeps showing how inept they are. This isn't a fkn joke , the cops ARE.
Do you remember how many cars were parked in the vicinity your workplace the last workday before you made this comment?
How many cars were parked in the vicinity exactly 1 week after you made this original comment ?
@@cutthroatgaming6722 your explanation of comparison is trash. If I worked at a job, doing the same thing everyday, I'd be more likely, not to recollect something, because of the robotic, repetitive, tedious work, compared to being out in the community, monitoring and controlling people.🤔😒🤷
Ahh the good ol’ days, when we used to go in person to the corrupt courts
Lol I have a court date next week, theyll still call you in. But it's a speeding ticket so you can pay that online.
Corrupt? yeah that's what all the drunk drivers say.
@@nirvana34534 are you naive or just dumb? Genuinely asking.
@@nirvana34534 answer the question
You mean 2016? You know you can still go right? Instead of complaining, go watch
So what ended up happening with the trial?
I like this judge, she seems a lot more humble, and personable, than most of the judges I have seen.
Ikr I had to go to a judge to get my name changed and they were super confrontational about it. Would of liked to have this judge.
I’ve noticed judges (and really everyone with authority) act a lot less tyrannical when they know it’s being filmed. There is another TH-cam channel that posts all the family court hearings in Clark county Nevada. Those judges are way more fair than the standard family court judge.
How much trouble are you getting into??
Funny story I married a woman with three children, they all took my last name, the youngest one was so adamant about having my name that she actually had it changed on her birth certificate add a financial cost to her. Six weeks later she was married. And her name change she had again. Lol
I got a judge in my town who does it by the book. I had my charges thrown out for refusing to give my ID with no crime committed. I let the dumb cops arrest me and took care of it in court. Tried to get me on obstructing governmental assembly. I think not fools learn the laws.
Which part of this 23 minute clip delivers the killer blow that shows the accused walks free of all charges.
nowhere.
IKR - I just watched this 23 min clip to find out what exactly? Unsubbed.
Apparently not at all. All I hear is repetition of silly irrelevant questions. I began anticipating: do you always wear those kinds of socks? Or do you sometimes wear both a green and pink sock? What would be a reason not to wear a yellow sock?
You people are ignoramuses
@@michaelshepherd733 explain yourself, Michael.