ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ก.ย. 2024
- Main Website:
www.trekyards.com
Support Trekyards on Patreon:
/ community
Trekyards Discord Server: / discord
Eaglemoss Link: click.linksyner...
Discount Code: TREKYARDS for 15% off orders of $50 or more
Star Trek Mission Crate discount link: lootcrate.com/t...
Discount code: TREKYARDS to save 10% off your order
Other TH-cam Channel:
Captain Foley's Channel
/ @stuartfoleycaptainfoley
Social Media:
Main Trekyards Facebook Page:
/ trekyards
Main Fleetyards Facebook Page:
/ fleetyards
Trekyards Model Building Showcase Facebook Page:
/ 525656090901951
Team Trekyards Star Trek Online Facebook Group:
/ teamtrekyards
Star Trek Timelines (Trekyards Facebook Team Page):
/ 836643756447057
![โฮ่ง! (SUGOI) - LYKN [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nFp4zjAARFs/mqdefault.jpg)
Perhaps she started as a starfleet vessel but was bought as surplus by the ECS.
This could also mean that she has a renumbered registration.
Ya know if you remove the pontoons, flip the nacelles under the saucer and it would make it into a tos/tmp Defiant type escort looking ship.
Im not seeing any canadian options on the eaglemoss store (?)
There is a side view of the ship in the Star Trek Encyclopedia. It looks very much different from the model produced for Eaglemoss.
This was one I ordered the first day it was available here in the USA. I received it and the only disappointment was that i couldn't find a single review of it online, so had no one to share my thoughts with. So thank you for posting this review, and its nice to know another classic TOS Trek guy also likes a ship from ST-2009. I was starting to feel dirty and disgusted with myself for getting a JJ item lol. I 100% agree with the 'Special' Klingon Battlecruiser too. Its a great design and fits nicely into the line, right between the D5 and D7. I guess you could say in my 'head cannon' its a D6? cheers & all the best.
I want that little warp drive behind you
I'm not a huge fan of the JJverse ship designs in general, but this one is great and is easily my favorite. It feels era-appropriate and on top of that is actually very cool. Win-win-win-win-win scenario.
I feel like that is definitely the same ship from the film though? Have you tried turning it to the same orientation as the shot from the film and doing a side-by-side comparison?
Great review. Really enjoyed it. I will be purchasing the model.
Great review!
Your warpdrive in the background. Is that the car charger USB port one?
How did you wire it up to work with a mains power?
5:24 That ship on the cover of the book was from the old History of Flight Star Trek book, and I want to say it was called the 'Tritium class'.
WOO! Eaglemoss to Canada. So happy about that
Also Sulu's Kobayashi Maru experience was also chronicled in the novel, and it was actually pretty heartbreaking. Jimmy Doohan did a great reading of it for the book on audio.
I think this is my favorite Kelvin Timeline design. To bad we only get a glimps of it in the movie
I picked one up from zavvi for $26.98 Aus with shipping today
Why would a fuel carrier have any passenger capacity, let alone one of 300, which combined with 80 odd crew, puts it almost on par with Constitution/Heavy Cruiser class?
Chief Jericho You say that as if there’s a problem with the stated numbers?
It’s a fuel hauler, and it carries 300 passengers, that’s it.
"WINNING!" - Charlie Sheen
Why dies it say Kelvin Timeline universe as it was obviously used during Saavik's training exercise in WOK? It was very definitely used in the TRUE cannon timeline.
Yes. But this is based on the model as seen in the 2009 movie
going to review the uss europa?
neat stuff looks ok to me and looking will see more
It looks like a well used ship.
Hey, that’s the one and only Eaglemoss I have! :P
Cant justify the price point for the XL size ships... Im happy with the original size, not one for the "bigger is better" mentality.
Jolly Good Show.
Point for discussion: shouldn't the ship be called be the "ECS Kobayashi Maru", not "USS Kobayashi Maru"? In the same way as the ECS Horizon or the ECS Fortunate, these Earth Cargo Ships are not Federation starships or ships of the line (I never liked the name United SPACEShip - United STARShip definitely sounds better). On the other hand, if the Kobayashi Maru never existed outside of the Academy bridge simulator, then Starfleet could call it whatever they wanted. I wonder if the cadets considered the simulation any less real, when they realised the cargo ship, with a cargo ship registry, had a USS name? Star Trek II never called it a starship or a cargo ship though - just Kobayashi Maru, Class III Neutronic Fuel carrier.
I guess it would be ECS if it was a private vessel and USS if it belongs to Starfleet.
@@starsiegeplayer Thinking of the Ptolemy class tug with its under-slung pods. Definitely a TOS-era Starfleet vessel, designed to haul cargo. So a Starfleet cargo vessel based on starship tech...? Why not?
HI Stuart. The ship on the cover of the Kobayashi Maru novel is actually the USS Tritium, from Rick Sternbach's Spaceflight Chronology. Don't know why Pocket Books used it on the cover - maybe they were looking for a cool-looking design??? Anyway, the Tritium's back story is interesting in itself. And as you're a big fan of three-nacelle warp designs, definitely worth a look at. "Starfleet's greatest failure!", so the story goes.
Yeah I have the book, signer by Rick. I'll need to go take another look. Thanks!
@@Trekyardswebseries No problem. I have the book too. Got it many years ago, at the 1991 25th Anniversary Creation Con on Los Angeles, where I met Rick and the Okudas. They were showing images of their upcoming TNG Technical Manual. Unfortunately, I bought the book AFTER meeting them. Don't recall too much, but I do remember discussing the Galaxy class-successor prototypes with Michael for quite a while.
so slender i thought you had a tv remote for a second lol
I still prefer the Klingon Hasparath Class version.
I have to admit, in my head-canon MADKOIFISH's awesome USS Mughi has always been the real-timeline TMP version of this ship. Look that up guys and gals, it's worth your time. Even a short flyby on youutube
At first i thought it looks like the 2009 version, but Captains right, it doesn't really.
Dont really like that version too much anyway, i think the STO version is far nicer.
So what does it look like then? I do like the design a lot. It looks at home with other ECS vessels and also with the original Enterprise 1701 & even the NX-01 in a way.
Looks kind of like a Discovery interpretation of the ship in the 2009 movie (mostly because of the hull plating)
Discovery? come now, no need for vulgar language like that here hehe.
@@misha5670 the sto version is like a miranda with the engines on top, the cargo pods on bottom and multiple hanger doors on the bridge module.
I was under the impression that EM was a subscription service, which is why I've never bought any.
KlingonCaptain nope. Go to their shop. You can buy everything they sell individually. In fact ships like this Kobayashi Maru you can only by through their online store. You can also do subscription but unless you’re real hardcore and want every ship, I’d suggest individually and cherry pick the ones you want.
KlingonCaptain also if you do buy eaglemoss try to buy from their official shop. Quality of each model can vary, and if you get a severely faulty model they’re usually good about sending a replacement if you email customer service pictures.
@@forrestpenrod2294 Thank you for the information.
Cherrypicker here, and nope you don't have to subscribe. Yes if you do, you get a discount, but really if you either use a code like 'TREKYARDS' or wait for a sale (EM does them often), you can get the same or even a better price. This way you get the ones you like, and don't have to waste time, money, and shelf space on ships that don't interest you.
Huh???😶
star trek online one looks better.
I find this to be a very meh design and the front reminds too much of one of the pit droids from SW Ep. 1.
That's hands down the ugliest federation ship I've ever seen.
Rick B there’s worse
Agreed that it is ugly, but its a cargo ship so its suppposed to be ugly. I grew up on a pretty large river and we would have tug boats, cargo bardges, and coast guard cutters come through; guess which one looked faster and sleaker? I like this one as its 'different.'
Lol nothing at all to do with the model but even the old cargo ships in Enterprise look better
And EM did a fantastic job with the ECS Fortunate too.