this people try to not to have a conversation about Palestinians suffering. There have been 18,000 people dead. This senators just dance with the money!
That guy was there only for the money . Didn’t give a sh#t about what was being discussed and decided or the statements that were being formulated. Has , by his own admission, not a clue as to what was going on . It’s ? Either that or he is morally bankrupt!! Probably both.
Totally agree. My son once to me "I'm Chilean" country in which I was born. I have to correct him by saying and explaining to him that he was AUSTRALIAN, beautiful country that he was born. And that was Australian, born in Chile of Spanish/British descent.
You're right those who fears AIPAC will take away their jobs. What Isreali allegiance got to do with local judge nomination? If I were him I'll have said what I believe which : Isreal is Aparthied State which annihilated 20,000 ppl 7,500 were children whlist 6,000 were Mothers & young girls.
Why do you think it’s been ongoing for the longest time? It is the last front. And they’re the ones meddling in others businesses. When has the Middle East ever invaded America? Not even in history. Because we all know who “discovered” it!
Why? Did you know about that before watching this? Do you know every political statement made by someone you work with, or live near? Israel was established by settlers after great violence against British forces, as Britain was ruling that area after WWII.
Good things to teach our new generations today. We can be Hateful, Scammers, Manipulators and con-artist to others. We can use the sympathy card when we need to.🤦The world is upside down🤦
I guess it is up to interpretation I mean I know how I would feel if my grandparents were forcibly removed from their homeland while generations of my relatives are cordoned off to a giant outdoor prison.
Zionist Leader David Ben-Gurion what did he say about creation of Isreali ? “If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?” David Ben-Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121. “Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves … politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves… The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country. … Behind the terrorism [by the Arabs] is a movement, which though primitive is not devoid of idealism and self sacrifice.” - David Ben Gurion. Quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky’s Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan’s “Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech. “We must do everything to insure they (the Palestinians) never do return.” David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar’s Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157. Ben Gurion also warned in 1948: Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes: “The old will die and the young will forget.” “We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai.” David Ben-Gurion May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, a Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978. “If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel.” Ben-Gurion (Quoted on pp 855-56 in Shabtai Teveth’s Ben-Gurion in a slightly different translation). “It’s not a matter of maintaining the status quo. We have to create a dynamic state, oriented towards expansion.” -Ben Gurion “Every school child knows that there is no such thing in history as a final arrangement - not with regard to the regime, not with regard to borders, and not with regard to international agreements.” - Ben Gurion, War Diaries, 12/03/1947 following Israel’s “acceptance” of the U.N. Partition of 11/29/1947 (Simha Flapan, “Birth of Israel,” p.13) “We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population? ‘Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said ‘ Drive them out! ‘ “ Yitzhak Rabin, leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979. Partition: “after the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the state, we will abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine “ - Ben Gurion, p.22 “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan. “The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan. One does not demand from anybody to give up his vision. We shall accept a state in the boundaries fixed today - but the boundaries of Zionist aspirations are the concerns of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them.” P. 53, “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan October, 1936, during the Jewish Agency Executive meeting Ben-Gurion arguing in favor of transfer as a policy, he said “We are not a state and Britain will not do it for us…” although “there is nothing wrong in the idea.” “If it was permissible to move an Arab from the Galilee to Judea, why it is impossible to move an Arab from Hebron to Transjordan, which is much closer? There are vast expanses of land there and we are over crowded….Even the High Commission agrees to a transfer to Transjordan if we equip the peasants with land and money. If the Peel Commission and the London Government accept, we’ll remove the land problem from the agenda.” The Arabs, Ben-Gurion claimed, would not become landless as a result of Zionist land acquisition; they would be transferred to Transjordan. October 29, 1936 the 21 member of the Jewish Agency Executive endorsed the proposal of a transfer of displaced Arab farmers to Transjordan. Only two of the four non-Zionist members opted to dissent. Flapan, Zionism and the Palestinians, citing protocols of the Executive meeting, p. 261 12 July 1937, Ben-Gurion entered in his diary: “The compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the proposed Jewish state could give us something which we never had, even when we stood on our own feet during the days of the First and Second Temple” - a Galilee free from Arab population. Ben-Gurion went so far to write: “We must prepare ourselves to carry out” the transfer [emphasis in original] 27 July 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We have never wanted to dispossess the Arabs [but] because Britain is giving them part of the country which had been promised to us, it is fair that the Arabs in our state be transferred to the Arab portion” 5 October 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We must expel the Arabs and take their places…. And, if we have to use force-not to dispossess the Arabs of the Negev and Transjordan, but to guarantee our own right to settle in those places- then we have force at our disposal.” “It is very possible that the Arabs of the neighboring countries will come to their aid against us. But our strength will exceed theirs. Not only because we will be better organized and equipped, but because behind us there stands a still larger force, superior in quantity and quality …the whole younger generation of Jews from Europe and America.” Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p.297-299, p. 330-331. See also Teveth, Ben-Gurion and the Palestinian Arabs, p. 182-189 Ben-Gurion in an address to the central committee of the Histadrut on 30 December 1947: “In the area allocated to the Jewish State there are not more than 520,000 Jews and about 350,000 non-Jews, mostly Arabs. Together with the Jews of Jerusalem, the total population of the Jewish State at the time of its establishment will be about a million, including almost 40 percent non-Jews. Such a [population] composition does not provide a stable basis for a Jewish State. This [demographic] fact must be viewed in all its clarity and acuteness. With such a [population] composition, there cannot even be absolute certainty that control will remain in the hands of the Jewish majority…. There can be no stable and strong Jewish State so long as it has a Jewish majority of only 60 percent.” On the 6th of February 1948, during a Mapai Party Council, Ben-Gurion responded to a remark from a member of the audience that “we have no land there” [in the hills and mountains west of Jerusalem] by saying: “The war will give us the land. The concepts of “ours” and “not ours” are peace concepts, only, and in war they lose their whole meaning” (Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 6 February 1948. p.211) Addressing the Mapai Council the following day, Ben-Gurion declared: “From your entry into Jerusalem, through Lifta, Romema… there are no Arabs. One hundred percent Jews. Since Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans, it has not been so Jewish. In many Arab neighborhoods in the west one sees not a single Arab. I do not assume that this will change… What had happened in Jerusalem… is likely to happen in many parts of the country …in the six, eight or ten months of the campaign there will certainly be great changes in the composition of the population in the country.” (Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 7 February 1948. p. 210-211) And two months later, Ben-Gurion speaking to the Zionist Actions Committee on 6 April, Ben-Gurion declared: “We will not be able to win the war if we do not, during the war, populate upper and lower, eastern and western Galilee, the Negev and Jerusalem area….I believe that war will also bring in its wake a great change in the distribution of the Arab population.” [Ben-Gurion, Behilahem Yisrael, Tel Aviv, Mapai Press, 1952, pp. 86-87] Ben-Gurion wrote in his diary on 12 July 1937: “the compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the projected Jewish State…. We have to stick to this conclusion the same way we grabbed the Balfour Declaration, more than that, the same way we grabbed at Zionism itself.” (Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p. 299)
What has the holocaust got anything to do with the question.millions off people around the world think israel is a colonial state.thousands off jewish people think what the current government is doing is wrong.its absurd these queations.and its all to do with one thing.the israel lobby.its worth millions to politicians in america.and as long as it lasts no one will speak out.why?because your finished if u do.
@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat The guy is probably on a dozen boards and he is supposed to know the letters that every member of every board he's ever sat on has written. I know right wingers love Hawleys yes or no grandstanding but he's just part of the lowering of discourse.
Don't you think the senator is the person off on a tangent here? What does Israel having a right to exist have to do with the US third-circuit court? Hawley embarrassed himself trying to "gotcha" this guy, "HOW COULD YOU NOT BE AWARE OF THIS LETTER!?!" - "Uh... that advisory board only met once a year."
Funny how you want an American to be nominated but have no issues with been occupied by the Israeli lobby who work and make policies in the interest of Israel at the expense of the Americans…… The Irony😂 Here we are all thinking its only Palestine that occupied.
"Should American Jews be safe in their homes and on their campuses?" and the dude couldn't answer yes- wtlf?!?!? GOOD JOB AS USUAL HAWLEY- YOU ARE A BLESSUNG TO AMERICA!! ❤❤❤
Not really.. sad thing is, he’ll be nominated and the world will move on, just as we will after getting pissed off about these videos. The day after, we’ll be back at our jobs etc, and all will continue..
So I could construct a line of questioning about arming the contras, arming Saddam Hussein, arming Bin Laden, arming Hamas, arming ISIS, arming South American cartels and so long as it exemplified your ability to produce a truthful response, the line of questioning is irrelevant? I could concoct some LSAT quiz where you are being asked by an FBI informant to kidnap the governor of Michigan, contrasting your loyalty and duty to your friends to break the law vs your objective moral duty to resist peer pressure, and so long as you produce a truthful response the content of your response is irrelevant? I don't think you care about the truth (and know these lawmakers don't.) I think you know that they are trying to clarify his political attitudes which he has no duty to testify, especially if he believes he can conduct his official business without being affected by this bias. And I think they are trying to fundraise off a tragedy by sucking up in public hearings. We shouldn't have to endure Adam Schiff's McCarthyism only coming from Republicans instead. Americans have a right to say, think and feel that Israel should be a sheet of nuclear glass in the desert. We certainly do with dozens of other countries.
Is Israel practicing apartheid? If no, then why Palestinians living in the West Bank live under martial law and Israelis in the West Bank live under martial law???
@@HusseinDoha It will be a long answer for me and the Senator cannot answer because either he is an atheist or non-religious. Senator and his comrades need to be schooled. Muslims do not hate the Jews or Children of Israel. The fact that Jews or Children of Israel are addressed directly so often in the Qur'an should tell us something. Allah wants to address Jews, to give them dawah [the message], to give them the Qur'an, instead of having stereotypes about them. Islam doesn’t allow stereotypes. Everyone is equal in the eyes of Allah, and the only thing that makes some people better than others is Taqwa [faith/belief]. In the Bible, Joshua 21:43-44 states: “So the Lord gave to Israel all the land of which He had sworn to give to their fathers, and they took possession of it and dwelt in it. The Lord gave them rest all around, according to all that He had sworn to their fathers. And not a man of all their enemies stood against them; the Lord delivered all their enemies into their hand. Not a word failed of any good thing which the Lord had spoken to the house of Israel. All came to pass”. This passage suggests that the Israelites had already taken possession of all the land that God had promised to their forefathers even before the creation of modern State of Israel. The promise of land belonging to the Children of Israel is never permanent. It comes with conditions: “Surely, following the ˹heavenly˺ Record, We decreed in the Scriptures: “My righteous servants shall inherit the land.” (Qur'an 21:105) Psalm 37:29 states that “The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein for ever”. This passage is often interpreted as a promise of God’s blessing for those who live righteously. It is believed that the righteous will be rewarded with a place in the land of Israel, which is often referred to as the “promised land”. Similarly, G-d is sovereign over the nations and history. He raises up and brings down kings and empires according to His will. He uses human agents, even pagan ones, to accomplish His purposes. He is the Lord of hosts, who controls the armies of heaven and earth (Jeremiah 1:15; 25:9; 27:5-7; 32:17) If Zionists claim that G-d had given the land of Palestine to the Jews is true, then why Abraham had to negotiate with the Hittites to purchase a burial plot for his wife, Sarah [Genesis 23]? Why didn't Abraham just take the land like the Zionists did? The so-called "promised land" was given to descendant of Abraham - Isaac only. Likewise, descendants of Ishmael never lay claim to land of Arabia! In addition, Moses and his followers did not enter the "promised" land due to their disobedience. Qur'an 7:128 states: Said Moses to his people, “Seek help through Allah and be patient. Indeed, the earth belongs to Allah. He causes to inherit it whom He wills of His servants. And the [best] outcome is for the righteous.” Jews are no longer G-d chosen people. The Israelites did not keep their part of the covenant. Here is the evidence: Jeremiah 31:31-34: “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.” It had already been prophesized in the Bible that the descendants of Ishmael/Arabs shall administer the Temple Mount/Jerusalem. Isaiah 60:7 "All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory." All the flocks of Kedar - On the word 'Kedar,' see the notes at Isaiah 21:16. The Kedarenians were a wandering tribe that frequently changed their residence, though it is probable they usually dwelt in the south part of Arabia Desert, or the north of Arabia Petraea. They are mentioned as dwelling in beautiful tents Sol 1:5 : 'I am black, but comely as the tents of Kedar,' see Psalm 120:5; compare Isaiah 21:16-17; Isaiah 42:11. The language here also means that that which constituted their principal wealth would come and enrich Jerusalem. The rams of Nebaioth - Nebaioth was also a son of Ishmael Genesis 25:13; 1 Chronicles 1:29, and was the father of the Nabatheans. They were a people of Arabia Petraea, and lived principally by plunder, trade, and the keeping of flocks. The country of Nabathea extended, it is supposed, from the Euphrates to the Red Sea, and embraced Petra, the capital of Arabia Deserts, and also Medaba. It is not possible, however, to fix the exact boundaries of the various tribes of Arabians. The general idea is, that their most valuable possessions would be devoted to God. The second Temple had been completely destroyed as predicted by Jesus in Luke 21:5-38. For 500 years or more, it had been left in ruins by the Jews. When Umar Ibn al-Khattab, the second caliph of Islam, captured Jerusalem in 638 CE, there was not a single Jew in Jerusalem. Now, as prophesized by Isaiah, Jerusalem is administered by descendants of Ishmael/Arabs. Dome of the Rock is the Third Temple. There are some interpretations of the Bible that suggest that the construction of the Dome of the Rock is prophesied in the Book of Daniel. Specifically, some people believe that Daniel 12:11 is a prophecy about the building of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. "And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days." [Daniel 12:11] Rabbi Isser Weisberg of Machon Mishne Torah in Lakewood, explained that the “appalling abomination” spoken about in the Book of Daniel is the Dome of the Rock on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, which was completed in the year 692. Counting 1290 (a thousand two hundred and ninety) years from the completion of the Dome of the Rock “you get 1982 and the 1335 (one thousand three hundred and thirty-five) ends in 2027. So that’s the window (1982-2027) when the Moshiach has to come.” This may confirmed the Qur'anic message. In Qur'an 17:104 says "And We said to the Children of Israel after Pharaoh, “Reside in the land, but when the promise of the Hereafter comes to pass, We will bring you all together.” The modern state of Israel was promised by British and its allies and not by G-d. In ancient Israel, G-d had prepared Moses for 80 years to lead His people Israel. 1948+80= 2028 may be the complete systematic dismantling of the modern state of Israel by God All-mighty. It is a heresy/unholy to think that Jews shall administer Temple Mount/Jerusalem as it had been clear in the Holy scripture that descendants of Ishmael/Arabs had been ordained by G-d to administer Jerusalem/Temple Mount. In Hebrew Bible, Devarim 32:17 reads as follows: "They sacrificed to demons, not God, to gods they had not known, new gods that had come recently, whom your ancestors had not feared". The medieval commentator Ibn Ezra suggested that the “new gods” mentioned in this verse were actually the gods of foreign nations that the Israelites had come into contact with.
"new gods" is today's Zionism. Zionism is a nationalist movement that emerged in the 19th century to enable the establishment of a homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine. The movement initially emerged in Central and Eastern Europe as a national revival movement in the late 19th century, both in reaction to newer waves of antisemitism and as a consequence of Haskalah, or Jewish Enlightenment. Since the establishment of Israel, Zionism became an ideology that supports “the development and protection of the State of Israel”. One cannot deny that the conflicts in the middle-east is caused by the Zionism movement and the violations of the 3 Oaths made by the Jews found in the Talmud (Song of Songs 2:7, 3:5, 8:4): The Oaths: First Oath: Israel should not ascend to the land in a wall (i.e., en masse or forcefully). Second Oath: The Holy One adjured Israel not to rebel against the nations of the world. Third Oath: The Holy One adjured the nations not to oppress Israel excessively. Jews worldwide are now paying the price for the violations of the 3 Oaths Zionism ("new gods") is only around 100 years old. It is the transformation from religion to nationalism, to materialism created by non-religious Jews who hated their religion. The reason why they use the name Israel, the Star of David, hijacking, stealing the identity of Judaism and the Jewish people is in order to gain a legitimacy for their existence that should lead people to say, 'oh, it is God given to them' and that they should use fear and intimidate people from speaking out against their actions because they will call those that do anti Semitic; it couldn't be anything further from the Truth. Leviticus 26:18 “And if ye will not yet for all this hearken unto me, then I will punish you seven times more for your sins.” Qur'an 62:5 "The example of those who were entrusted with the Torah and then did not take it on is like that of a donkey who carries volumes [of books]. Wretched is the example of the people who deny the signs of Allah. And Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people."
Whatever the outcome of the war against hamas…….this has highlighted the world of anti Jewish sentiment and hatred across the world. Both politically and publicly, a blinding light has been shone into the putrid darkness of racism and hatred of certain ethnic groups and faiths. It’s been absolutely shocking but essential to see this unfolding everywhere across the globe.
The fact he won't condemn the statement gives you your answer, it's a simple yes or no question. I suppose we should be thankful that he did say he did condemn it publicly, but then supports it privately, seem that sort of think in the past, people(s) pretending to be against something but secretly support it. Hell countries, big corporations condemn things all the time, then you find out they have been secretly funding the thing they publicly condemn, then say it never happened.
If he asked me if Israel has and still is using violence for colonialism, I can answer the question yes, I know the history though. It would be irresponsible to answer that question yes or no if you do not know the history.
Zionist Leader David Ben-Gurion what did he say about creation of Isreali ? “If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?” David Ben-Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121. “Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves … politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves… The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country. … Behind the terrorism [by the Arabs] is a movement, which though primitive is not devoid of idealism and self sacrifice.” - David Ben Gurion. Quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky’s Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan’s “Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech. “We must do everything to insure they (the Palestinians) never do return.” David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar’s Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157. Ben Gurion also warned in 1948: Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes: “The old will die and the young will forget.” “We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai.” David Ben-Gurion May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, a Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978. “If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel.” Ben-Gurion (Quoted on pp 855-56 in Shabtai Teveth’s Ben-Gurion in a slightly different translation). “It’s not a matter of maintaining the status quo. We have to create a dynamic state, oriented towards expansion.” -Ben Gurion “Every school child knows that there is no such thing in history as a final arrangement - not with regard to the regime, not with regard to borders, and not with regard to international agreements.” - Ben Gurion, War Diaries, 12/03/1947 following Israel’s “acceptance” of the U.N. Partition of 11/29/1947 (Simha Flapan, “Birth of Israel,” p.13) “We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population? ‘Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said ‘ Drive them out! ‘ “ Yitzhak Rabin, leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979. Partition: “after the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the state, we will abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine “ - Ben Gurion, p.22 “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan. “The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan. One does not demand from anybody to give up his vision. We shall accept a state in the boundaries fixed today - but the boundaries of Zionist aspirations are the concerns of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them.” P. 53, “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan October, 1936, during the Jewish Agency Executive meeting Ben-Gurion arguing in favor of transfer as a policy, he said “We are not a state and Britain will not do it for us…” although “there is nothing wrong in the idea.” “If it was permissible to move an Arab from the Galilee to Judea, why it is impossible to move an Arab from Hebron to Transjordan, which is much closer? There are vast expanses of land there and we are over crowded….Even the High Commission agrees to a transfer to Transjordan if we equip the peasants with land and money. If the Peel Commission and the London Government accept, we’ll remove the land problem from the agenda.” The Arabs, Ben-Gurion claimed, would not become landless as a result of Zionist land acquisition; they would be transferred to Transjordan. October 29, 1936 the 21 member of the Jewish Agency Executive endorsed the proposal of a transfer of displaced Arab farmers to Transjordan. Only two of the four non-Zionist members opted to dissent. Flapan, Zionism and the Palestinians, citing protocols of the Executive meeting, p. 261 12 July 1937, Ben-Gurion entered in his diary: “The compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the proposed Jewish state could give us something which we never had, even when we stood on our own feet during the days of the First and Second Temple” - a Galilee free from Arab population. Ben-Gurion went so far to write: “We must prepare ourselves to carry out” the transfer [emphasis in original] 27 July 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We have never wanted to dispossess the Arabs [but] because Britain is giving them part of the country which had been promised to us, it is fair that the Arabs in our state be transferred to the Arab portion” 5 October 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We must expel the Arabs and take their places…. And, if we have to use force-not to dispossess the Arabs of the Negev and Transjordan, but to guarantee our own right to settle in those places- then we have force at our disposal.” “It is very possible that the Arabs of the neighboring countries will come to their aid against us. But our strength will exceed theirs. Not only because we will be better organized and equipped, but because behind us there stands a still larger force, superior in quantity and quality …the whole younger generation of Jews from Europe and America.” Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p.297-299, p. 330-331. See also Teveth, Ben-Gurion and the Palestinian Arabs, p. 182-189 Ben-Gurion in an address to the central committee of the Histadrut on 30 December 1947: “In the area allocated to the Jewish State there are not more than 520,000 Jews and about 350,000 non-Jews, mostly Arabs. Together with the Jews of Jerusalem, the total population of the Jewish State at the time of its establishment will be about a million, including almost 40 percent non-Jews. Such a [population] composition does not provide a stable basis for a Jewish State. This [demographic] fact must be viewed in all its clarity and acuteness. With such a [population] composition, there cannot even be absolute certainty that control will remain in the hands of the Jewish majority…. There can be no stable and strong Jewish State so long as it has a Jewish majority of only 60 percent.” On the 6th of February 1948, during a Mapai Party Council, Ben-Gurion responded to a remark from a member of the audience that “we have no land there” [in the hills and mountains west of Jerusalem] by saying: “The war will give us the land. The concepts of “ours” and “not ours” are peace concepts, only, and in war they lose their whole meaning” (Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 6 February 1948. p.211) Addressing the Mapai Council the following day, Ben-Gurion declared: “From your entry into Jerusalem, through Lifta, Romema… there are no Arabs. One hundred percent Jews. Since Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans, it has not been so Jewish. In many Arab neighborhoods in the west one sees not a single Arab. I do not assume that this will change… What had happened in Jerusalem… is likely to happen in many parts of the country …in the six, eight or ten months of the campaign there will certainly be great changes in the composition of the population in the country.” (Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 7 February 1948. p. 210-211) And two months later, Ben-Gurion speaking to the Zionist Actions Committee on 6 April, Ben-Gurion declared: “We will not be able to win the war if we do not, during the war, populate upper and lower, eastern and western Galilee, the Negev and Jerusalem area….I believe that war will also bring in its wake a great change in the distribution of the Arab population.” [Ben-Gurion, Behilahem Yisrael, Tel Aviv, Mapai Press, 1952, pp. 86-87] Ben-Gurion wrote in his diary on 12 July 1937: “the compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the projected Jewish State…. We have to stick to this conclusion the same way we grabbed the Balfour Declaration, more than that, the same way we grabbed at Zionism itself.” (Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p. 299)
Yeah except no one punishes discrimination against ‘non’ jewish caucasians. Ever. Not a peep. Btw ashkenazi jews are genetically Northern italian. They settled in germany in the early 1500s. And in the 1850’s jewish academics formulated and spread socialism and communism. Funded it. And ultimately brought it to the USA and proliferated and difussed it through movies. Music. Culture. Politics. Where is hawly’s vitriol and heated rhetoric? Anything. Where is it. Ask yourself honestly
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat he can be awesome without being ‘your guy’. I get that you’re attempting to be clever. Failing isn’t wise. You’re omitting that you likely support and vote for people you’ve never vetted or skeptically criticized. People who form your beliefs, which are inevitably cartoonish low resolution jelly brain filtered abstracts of political theater, which is what this was. My criticism was actually informed by an actual education. And the ability to think independently of anyone or anything. To your point whatever your ‘guy’ is, try gathering real knowledge, by actually pursuing it. Not having topical media beats flood your already limited cognitive resources with social engineering by a corrupt and now adversarial federal government that you scarcely understand. But by developing an actual intellect with research including all that the modes of transmitting mediums of ancestral knowledge by reading original sources and compiled analysis of it. Then cross reference all cultures, religions, across known history and you’ll understand the precise framework for the present guiding philosophies, legal theories, and constitutional morphism we now see, in contrast with say the guidelines of the federalist papers. Read the philosophies of john locke. Look now at a congress plying the easily manipulated into seeing only the distraction, not the misdeeds we all know Washington for decades has been culpable of. Read of similar intrigue and betrayal at the highest levels of histories greatest civilizations. Ponder the cost of decadence and complacency. The lack of seriousness inherent in your comment here. Try it. Think
@@azurebadger Youre trying to sound intelligent while standing up for a grand-standing **politician** making a show for social media trying to ask a **District Court Judge** nominee what his opinion is of a war that is 6000 miles away from the US 3rd Circuit and has literally nothing at all to do with confirming a judge. This nominee isn't "dodging" his questions like ya'll are saying. He's literally confused. He's completely befuddled why this politician is asking a Judge about foreign policy.
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat everyone knows something about that situation 6000 miles away. He was on the board of what again? Heisnt confused. Its called filibustering. Have you never listened to these hearings before? Or any politician in similar circumstances ever? I recently read an account of this political ambiguity dance in Rhodesia in the 70’s. Same exact thing. Are you trying to sound smart? I however can predict the simplicity of your every opinion. By all means continue oif you want your belief system dramatically rearranged, as if you could endure it. You missed all of my points. You simplified all framework on the matter and rendered a shallow rationalization. Thats the proper definition of what you attempted. Thats something that belies the issue i spoke to. You have your remedy. Get on with it and stop wasting time talking to people you scarcely comprehend let alone possess the power to persuade. Again you didnt catch my meaning. And the first comment here was mine and you couldnt see it, so devastating was my critique of thetheatrics of congress apparently. Thats something you should note. Off you go
On occupied territory and denying the indigenous of their rights. Would have to do to the Palestinians what America did to the native Indians to feel safe
They are all like that. They will give you a word salad answer that actually answers nothing. In my opinion they pick the guy who can answer without actually answering anything.This is like a test to see if they stand up to questioning under pressure. This is an initiation not a hearing.
@Judahkings unlike your simple minds he realises things are more complicated and myprejudicede decisions he could be making in the futur, which could lead people to claim bias on one side or the other.
@@Ugskdjrdjhdjzsjwjoh what a bunch of crap. He was asking a moral question. It wasn’t difficult to give an answer, and an advanced knowledge of Middle Eastern geopolitics is not needed to provide a moral answer.
@@Ugskdjrdjhdjzsjwj So, supporting Terrorists is now moral? Because honestly if you don't support or defend Israel, and you agree with Hamas than you are supporting Terrorists and continued Terrorism. Hmmmmmmm.......🤔
Think about it from his perspective. This line of questioning was bizarre and completely unorthodox. Given that he's Pakistani, it was perfectly reasonable for him to wonder if Hawley thinks he's from the Middle East and has a personal connection to the current conflict, which he does not.
@themaskedman221 think about it from this perspective, muslims only see atrocities when it is a non Muslim involved. Do you know Saudi killed 200k+ Muslims in Yemen or the fact that Iran is committing atrocities against its own citizens? Where was this condemnation against Saudi then? Don't act naive and don't expect these people to act naively. It is all for the Ummah. That's the name of this game
Well he's talking about his blood that's flowing through his body. That's like saying you're Irish or you're Mexican doesn't necessarily mean you're from Mexico or you're from Ireland and you believe that you are Irish and you have no loyalty to the United states. But I wouldn't doubt it in this guy's case because all these crooked corrupt politicians judges and school academics are corrupt
Not even I could come to that high level of humor as you and I consider myself to have a higher sense of humor than those good for nothing late night TV talk show hosts humor.
It is very disgusting to use holocaust to justify the savage Israeli crimes against innocent Palestinian people and blackmail any one say the truth about israeli occupation and i think 7 October was the reaction to all atrocities to the Palestinian people for more than 70 years
Why is Hawley a Great Defender of Jewish Americans, and Schumer ( the Jew) is Not! Very puzzling. Not a rhetorical question. I would Greatly appreciate a reasonable explanation. Thanks
I like how one of his defenses was “I am from Pakistan” and therefore he doesn’t know anything or need to know. Good, go back to Pakistan then. This isn’t acceptable here.
“Sir I don’t want to answer that question because I may get my head sawed off if I answer incorrectly…..oh ah I mean..I didnt grow up in the Middle East.”
@@Mondo_mog How many protests on campuses do you see about North Korea, Russia, China, Boko Haram etc? Why the relentless focus on the one Jewish nation on Earth? Islamist propaganda.
This is the kind of senators we all need in the Senate the way that Josh Hawley is going after this nominee that is probably going to be put on the bench regardless of what the Republicans have to say about it don't you think it's time to change your judicial system to where it's not for the senators to put these judges on the bench for lifetime 10 years the simple fact is I don't think any judge should be have a lifetime tenure except for the supreme Court any other judges that are put on the bench regardless of it being a federal bench or a state court or any other court their limits should be to 4 years an 4 Year's only
Asking someone if "Israel is a violent colonial state" is not straightforward at all. It requires a huge amount of historical knowledge and international law knowledge. You will get vastly different answers from highly intelligent people on both sides. It would be irresponsible to answer that question without being an expert in the long history of the area of the world. Unless you are a dishonest politician. Then all you have to think about is how will this look to my voters.
@dakotaeaslick1733 The problem is that this happens a lot at these things. When they don't want to give an answer, that will be on the record and shows what position they have on a subject. They deflect by not saying yes or no. Also, when they are asked to come to these things, they generally know what the topic is and therefore can prepare. This is not an isolated event. This happens every time the answer to the question may hurt them politically. The issue with Israel should not be that hard to answer for an educated person like him. The fact that a yes answer would hurt him with his peers is enough to make you believe he was deflecting on purpose.
I have watched hundreds and hundreds of committee hearing like this and it makes me sick that these people who do NOT care about morality, truth or giving honest answers to anything are never accouintable.
I'm starting to think, people being specifically questioned like this, should HAVE to answer either yes or no or maybe, and then be allowed to qualify their answer afterwards! There's a reason they refuse to answer yes or no!
They refuse to give direct answers because they under internal pressure from within the organizations they lead. It's a problem when you have polarized Arab students and lecturers along with radical left bullshit ideologists in the college you lead that will see any tiny bit of empathy towards Jews or the victims of Oct 7 or any tiny bit of maybe some tiny little bit of saying a glimpse of a shred of a comment slightly favoring Israel, as a justification for what they think is a Genocide in Gaza. They don't hate Jews, they are simply cowards.
Adeel Deception, Lying and Taqiyya Does Islam permit Muslims to lie? Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other... unless the purpose of lying is to "smooth over differences" or "gain the upper-hand over an enemy." There are several forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, the best known being taqiyya (the Shia name). These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause of Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.
What's up with these people using Taqiya as an example for their arguement 😭 ITS ONLY FOUND WITHIN THE SHIAS WHO ARE A MINORITY GET THAT INTO YOUR HEADDDDDD! ITS LIKE COMPARING CHRISTIANS TO CATHOLICS 😭😭😭
@@itswobblypancake7981 Oh we get it.. So what you are saying is that you follow a man who tells you that you can not have friends who does not believe what you believe as in 3:28 and in 5:51 and 60:1 and what is it you have to do to make us think how peaceful you are.. WHEN in REALITY what is it you feel towards the People of the Book... What was it that as one who believes in al-Lah must do towards the Jew when they are hiding behind a Rock...?? Now Are you able to say what the man Muhammad really is..because we have a different name for what he has taught, what those men can do to "the little ones".... and it isn't prophet. Tell the Truth.. if you can that is.............
It's just crazy ! When someone doesn't want to answer obvious and simple questions, it means that it's risky for him to admit the truth. What a shame !
Ironically, for a nominee to the bench of a high court of the United States to dodge a direct question in an inquiry and test of facts is a prediction of incompetence in executing his office in the matter, as a referee of adjudication of compelling a witness to answer honestly.
Yes. I recall the look on her face that said, 'Shit, this guy knows I'm an idiot and he's gonna' prove it!' when she was asked for the definition.@@MrHonk58
Prob doesn’t want to incriminate himself, incase of lawsuits so he coward up instead but i bet he talks a lotta shit and feels like a tough guy when he’s home with his family smh
@@Mdtv1982 Simple yes or no would suffice but dude was beating around the bush at every question, so Hawley interjected to avoid the long and unnecessary answers. It’s interesting to see the different viewpoints tho especially when biased. I’m neutral but even I can see what’s happening here
@@CrackedSociety you can’t respond yes or no to a complicated question which is why he didn’t. He also wasn’t given a second to respond which is why the other member apologized to him
I'm South African, please interview me. 😂😂Vetri South African Indian,seven qualifications, published etc etc know the American Constitution too. Yo, these candidates. Great job Senator.
Dodging questions like a Hamas supporter
Senator Hawley, Cruz, and Kennedy are awesome men.
You are so brainwashed it's sad
TRIUMVIRATE OF AMERICA 🇺🇸
IF IF HE disagreed with this statement he should answer strongly ¨No ! ¨ It is a very important question.
Our politicians who take money from lobby organizations for foreign countries should register as an foreign agents.
Allowed for Israel only.Saudi Arabia for example, is prohibited
this people try to not to have a conversation about Palestinians suffering. There have been 18,000 people dead. This senators just dance with the money!
Except if your a Biden😮
That guy was there only for the money . Didn’t give a sh#t about what was being discussed and decided or the statements that were being formulated. Has , by his own admission, not a clue as to what was going on .
It’s ? Either that or he is morally bankrupt!! Probably both.
@@OZ-hn2shThe “people” voted in Hamas!
When he said I am Pakistani - then how he can he hold American fedral position. ? He suppose to say that I am American but born in Pakistan
Totally agree. My son once to me "I'm Chilean" country in which I was born. I have to correct him by saying and explaining to him that he was AUSTRALIAN, beautiful country that he was born. And that was Australian, born in Chile of Spanish/British descent.
Exactly
Because despite the Democrats Globalist desires these people HOLD onto their origins! Sounds like Ilhan Omar 😢
Israel is not a colonial state. Period. Pakistanis should not be in a position to judge anything concerning Israel.
Anybody that's not American should never be aloud in the government oh my god
Can't give answer should = disqualified!
This war really brought out people's true colors.
You're right those who fears AIPAC will take away their jobs. What Isreali allegiance got to do with local judge nomination? If I were him I'll have said what I believe which : Isreal is Aparthied State which annihilated 20,000 ppl 7,500 were children whlist 6,000 were Mothers & young girls.
Why do you think it’s been ongoing for the longest time?
It is the last front. And they’re the ones meddling in others businesses. When has the Middle East ever invaded America? Not even in history. Because we all know who “discovered” it!
When you can't speak out against genocide you don't deserve to be a judge!! Stand up America 🇺🇸
Why does the man say he's Pakistani , is he not American ?
hes showing who his allegiance is with
No. He's Muslim and Pakistani in that order.
His allegiance is first to Islam, his own family and his Pakistan.
That response told us more than we need to know.
These people are sick. There should be consequences. There never are.
You’re right there should be consequences for people, pretending like Israel is not a colonial apartheid state
It's because of the UN. The UN is a disastrous islamic communist cult.
That guy should NOT be in our government.
Cry
Why? Did you know about that before watching this? Do you know every political statement made by someone you work with, or live near?
Israel was established by settlers after great violence against British forces, as Britain was ruling that area after WWII.
@@bobklahn42 have you ever heard of the Temple Mount....??
People that evade answering simple questions are disgusting hypocrites. Constantly beating around the freakin’ bush!!!
They are also abject liars
When the question was not being answered he's not telling the truth.
Thank you thank you thank you !
Expose these evil liars !
Good things to teach our new generations today. We can be Hateful, Scammers, Manipulators and con-artist to others. We can use the sympathy card when we need to.🤦The world is upside down🤦
Apparently that's all u need to be a politician.
Isreal hasn't violently colonized the west bank?
Woe to those that call good evil and evil good.
Nah, they don't just use the sympathy card, these lunatics play the VICTIM CARD, every chance they get!
I guess it is up to interpretation I mean I know how I would feel if my grandparents were forcibly removed from their homeland while generations of my relatives are cordoned off to a giant outdoor prison.
Sits on a board, hasn't heard, seen, read, talked to anybody about anything. Knows nothing.
Thats the best defense. I can't remember anything
Collect fat paycheck somehow...
Just like 'Sgt. Schultz' they always say: "I know nothing, NOTHING!"
Knows NOTHING perfect Democrat choice 😢
hypocritical people named by the Biden administration is trhe downfall in our country.
I can't believe it this happened In our days 😞
End times ... Impressive!
This is the harvest of the sowing seeds.
Look around, face masks, purple hair, groomer teachers, and manface galore.... you can't believe it? Really? Really?
No I really can t Jennifer
Zionist Leader David Ben-Gurion what did he say about creation of Isreali ? “If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?”
David Ben-Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121.
“Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves … politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves… The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country. … Behind the terrorism [by the Arabs] is a movement, which though primitive is not devoid of idealism and self sacrifice.”
- David Ben Gurion. Quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky’s Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan’s “Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech.
“We must do everything to insure they (the Palestinians) never do return.”
David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar’s Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157.
Ben Gurion also warned in 1948: Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes: “The old will die and the young will forget.”
“We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai.”
David Ben-Gurion May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, a Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.
“If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel.”
Ben-Gurion (Quoted on pp 855-56 in Shabtai Teveth’s Ben-Gurion in a slightly different translation).
“It’s not a matter of maintaining the status quo. We have to create a dynamic state, oriented towards expansion.” -Ben Gurion
“Every school child knows that there is no such thing in history as a final arrangement - not with regard to the regime, not with regard to borders, and not with regard to international agreements.”
- Ben Gurion, War Diaries, 12/03/1947 following Israel’s “acceptance” of the U.N. Partition of 11/29/1947 (Simha Flapan, “Birth of Israel,” p.13)
“We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population? ‘Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said ‘ Drive them out! ‘ “
Yitzhak Rabin, leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979.
Partition: “after the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the state, we will abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine “
- Ben Gurion, p.22 “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan.
“The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan. One does not demand from anybody to give up his vision. We shall accept a state in the boundaries fixed today - but the boundaries of Zionist aspirations are the concerns of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them.” P. 53, “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan
October, 1936, during the Jewish Agency Executive meeting Ben-Gurion arguing in favor of transfer as a policy, he said “We are not a state and Britain will not do it for us…” although “there is nothing wrong in the idea.”
“If it was permissible to move an Arab from the Galilee to Judea, why it is impossible to move an Arab from Hebron to Transjordan, which is much closer? There are vast expanses of land there and we are over crowded….Even the High Commission agrees to a transfer to Transjordan if we equip the peasants with land and money. If the Peel Commission and the London Government accept, we’ll remove the land problem from the agenda.”
The Arabs, Ben-Gurion claimed, would not become landless as a result of Zionist land acquisition; they would be transferred to Transjordan.
October 29, 1936 the 21 member of the Jewish Agency Executive endorsed the proposal of a transfer of displaced Arab farmers to Transjordan. Only two of the four non-Zionist members opted to dissent.
Flapan, Zionism and the Palestinians, citing protocols of the Executive meeting, p. 261
12 July 1937, Ben-Gurion entered in his diary: “The compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the proposed Jewish state could give us something which we never had, even when we stood on our own feet during the days of the First and Second Temple”
- a Galilee free from Arab population.
Ben-Gurion went so far to write: “We must prepare ourselves to carry out” the transfer [emphasis in original]
27 July 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We have never wanted to dispossess the Arabs [but] because Britain is giving them part of the country which had been promised to us, it is fair that the Arabs in our state be transferred to the Arab portion”
5 October 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We must expel the Arabs and take their places…. And, if we have to use force-not to dispossess the Arabs of the Negev and Transjordan, but to guarantee our own right to settle in those places- then we have force at our disposal.”
“It is very possible that the Arabs of the neighboring countries will come to their aid against us. But our strength will exceed theirs. Not only because we will be better organized and equipped, but because behind us there stands a still larger force, superior in quantity and quality …the whole younger generation of Jews from Europe and America.”
Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p.297-299, p. 330-331.
See also Teveth, Ben-Gurion and the Palestinian Arabs, p. 182-189
Ben-Gurion in an address to the central committee of the Histadrut on 30 December 1947:
“In the area allocated to the Jewish State there are not more than 520,000 Jews and about 350,000 non-Jews, mostly Arabs. Together with the Jews of Jerusalem, the total population of the Jewish State at the time of its establishment will be about a million, including almost 40 percent non-Jews. Such a [population] composition does not provide a stable basis for a Jewish State. This [demographic] fact must be viewed in all its clarity and acuteness. With such a [population] composition, there cannot even be absolute certainty that control will remain in the hands of the Jewish majority…. There can be no stable and strong Jewish State so long as it has a Jewish majority of only 60 percent.”
On the 6th of February 1948, during a Mapai Party Council, Ben-Gurion responded to a remark from a member of the audience that “we have no land there” [in the hills and mountains west of Jerusalem] by saying: “The war will give us the land. The concepts of “ours” and “not ours” are peace concepts, only, and in war they lose their whole meaning”
(Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 6 February 1948. p.211)
Addressing the Mapai Council the following day, Ben-Gurion declared: “From your entry into Jerusalem, through Lifta, Romema… there are no Arabs. One hundred percent Jews. Since Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans, it has not been so Jewish. In many Arab neighborhoods in the west one sees not a single Arab. I do not assume that this will change… What had happened in Jerusalem… is likely to happen in many parts of the country …in the six, eight or ten months of the campaign there will certainly be great changes in the composition of the population in the country.”
(Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 7 February 1948. p. 210-211)
And two months later, Ben-Gurion speaking to the Zionist Actions Committee on 6 April, Ben-Gurion declared: “We will not be able to win the war if we do not, during the war, populate upper and lower, eastern and western Galilee, the Negev and Jerusalem area….I believe that war will also bring in its wake a great change in the distribution of the Arab population.”
[Ben-Gurion, Behilahem Yisrael, Tel Aviv, Mapai Press, 1952, pp. 86-87]
Ben-Gurion wrote in his diary on 12 July 1937: “the compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the projected Jewish State…. We have to stick to this conclusion the same way we grabbed the Balfour Declaration, more than that, the same way we grabbed at Zionism itself.”
(Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p. 299)
I’m just curious, who selects these candidates?
What has the holocaust got anything to do with the question.millions off people around the world think israel is a colonial state.thousands off jewish people think what the current government is doing is wrong.its absurd these queations.and its all to do with one thing.the israel lobby.its worth millions to politicians in america.and as long as it lasts no one will speak out.why?because your finished if u do.
Isreal hasn't violently colonized the west bank?
Biden's team
Dems....
Senator Hawley will always have my vote if he ever decides to run for President!
Wish we had him here in G B can we have him over here PLEASE ❤❤❤
@@davidkean5247
GB does have Nigel Farage... but the BBC-obedient folks voted for Karl Marx !
Please answer: "Yes or No"
The answer: Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah
What does Israel having a right to exist have to do with the US third-circuit court?
Answer ...round the bush???
@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat The guy is probably on a dozen boards and he is supposed to know the letters that every member of every board he's ever sat on has written. I know right wingers love Hawleys yes or no grandstanding but he's just part of the lowering of discourse.
@@TheDmonet Better not be "right winging" at me if youre some lefty antisemite btw.
Answer yes or no is the way tyrants like to ask questions
how about a nominee actually answer the question instead of going off on some other tangent
He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.
Don't you think the senator is the person off on a tangent here? What does Israel having a right to exist have to do with the US third-circuit court?
Hawley embarrassed himself trying to "gotcha" this guy, "HOW COULD YOU NOT BE AWARE OF THIS LETTER!?!" - "Uh... that advisory board only met once a year."
He did answer. He said "I don't know."
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat
They want to support AIPAC
we can't afford having a jihadi sitting in that court.@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat
Oh so slippery....One can see what Israel is up against. Congratulations to Mr. Hawley. Mrs. Rosa Larsen
If he is 'Pakistani' as he himself stated, why is he being nominated for anything? I thought you had to be American?
Funny how you want an American to be nominated but have no issues with been occupied by the Israeli lobby who work and make policies in the interest of Israel at the expense of the Americans…… The Irony😂 Here we are all thinking its only Palestine that occupied.
I love whoever was off camera and sighed “oh God” when Hawley started bringing the 🔥 knowing he was not gonna let up
Ditto! That was what most of us were feeling!
Likely Durbin. He's rooting for the blue team all the way.
I KNOW! I caught that too.
That would be the clown Durbin I believe
@@josephzerblad2979 Clown indeed. Turbin and the rest of the donkeys know better but for some damned reason will not say so.
Horrible judicial nominee. Hope his nomination fails.
If he doesn't have the position to answer that question, then he doesn't have the right to stand in the position that he is being questioned upon.
He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.
Well said! This Man did not answer any of the questions and failed at his job. He needs to be removed
they are a violent colonial state, building on the West Bank contravention of international law and USA policy is illegal.
@@emilywise3767 Man answered it. Sorry you did not like it. BALOD
Deflection! That’s all y’all know
Ty Senator Hawley - from this Jewish American, my family my community and my people
We KNOW why they can't answer questions ⁉️ It's because answering honestly proves who they ARE 😈👿
"Should American Jews be safe in their homes and on their campuses?" and the dude couldn't answer yes- wtlf?!?!? GOOD JOB AS USUAL HAWLEY- YOU ARE A BLESSUNG TO AMERICA!! ❤❤❤
We can’t afford to live-this is not a real issue as usual with Josh
He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.
yea how he wants his children to be safe , and he's Palestinian :D @@monotech20.14
@@monotech20.14 No, he didn’t!
@@gals5252
He did say yes. WTF is wrong you people
This is why testimonialism is so important, if you can not or will not provide a truthful response you are deemed illegitimate.
Not really.. sad thing is, he’ll be nominated and the world will move on, just as we will after getting pissed off about these videos. The day after, we’ll be back at our jobs etc, and all will continue..
And yet that never happens! Our system is broken! Severely broken!
So I could construct a line of questioning about arming the contras, arming Saddam Hussein, arming Bin Laden, arming Hamas, arming ISIS, arming South American cartels and so long as it exemplified your ability to produce a truthful response, the line of questioning is irrelevant? I could concoct some LSAT quiz where you are being asked by an FBI informant to kidnap the governor of Michigan, contrasting your loyalty and duty to your friends to break the law vs your objective moral duty to resist peer pressure, and so long as you produce a truthful response the content of your response is irrelevant?
I don't think you care about the truth (and know these lawmakers don't.) I think you know that they are trying to clarify his political attitudes which he has no duty to testify, especially if he believes he can conduct his official business without being affected by this bias. And I think they are trying to fundraise off a tragedy by sucking up in public hearings. We shouldn't have to endure Adam Schiff's McCarthyism only coming from Republicans instead. Americans have a right to say, think and feel that Israel should be a sheet of nuclear glass in the desert. We certainly do with dozens of other countries.
What is the point of asking an American judicial nominee how he feels about a foreign conflict? -
Probably so the senator can get more $$ from AIPAC.
And in this case there is no legitimate answer!
"Do you condemn this statement, keeping in mind that the absence of a 'Yes' response is indeed a 'No' response?"
Is Israel practicing apartheid? If no, then why Palestinians living in the West Bank live under martial law and Israelis in the West Bank live under martial law???
@@HusseinDoha It will be a long answer for me and the Senator cannot answer because either he is an atheist or non-religious. Senator and his comrades need to be schooled.
Muslims do not hate the Jews or Children of Israel. The fact that Jews or Children of Israel are addressed directly so often in the Qur'an should tell us something. Allah wants to address Jews, to give them dawah [the message], to give them the Qur'an, instead of having stereotypes about them. Islam doesn’t allow stereotypes. Everyone is equal in the eyes of Allah, and the only thing that makes some people better than others is Taqwa [faith/belief].
In the Bible, Joshua 21:43-44 states:
“So the Lord gave to Israel all the land of which He had sworn to give to their fathers, and they took possession of it and dwelt in it. The Lord gave them rest all around, according to all that He had sworn to their fathers. And not a man of all their enemies stood against them; the Lord delivered all their enemies into their hand. Not a word failed of any good thing which the Lord had spoken to the house of Israel. All came to pass”.
This passage suggests that the Israelites had already taken possession of all the land that God had promised to their forefathers even before the creation of modern State of Israel.
The promise of land belonging to the Children of Israel is never permanent. It comes with conditions:
“Surely, following the ˹heavenly˺ Record, We decreed in the Scriptures: “My righteous servants shall inherit the land.” (Qur'an 21:105)
Psalm 37:29 states that “The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein for ever”. This passage is often interpreted as a promise of God’s blessing for those who live righteously. It is believed that the righteous will be rewarded with a place in the land of Israel, which is often referred to as the “promised land”.
Similarly, G-d is sovereign over the nations and history. He raises up and brings down kings and empires according to His will. He uses human agents, even pagan ones, to accomplish His purposes. He is the Lord of hosts, who controls the armies of heaven and earth (Jeremiah 1:15; 25:9; 27:5-7; 32:17)
If Zionists claim that G-d had given the land of Palestine to the Jews is true, then why Abraham had to negotiate with the Hittites to purchase a burial plot for his wife, Sarah [Genesis 23]? Why didn't Abraham just take the land like the Zionists did? The so-called "promised land" was given to descendant of Abraham - Isaac only. Likewise, descendants of Ishmael never lay claim to land of Arabia! In addition, Moses and his followers did not enter the "promised" land due to their disobedience.
Qur'an 7:128 states:
Said Moses to his people, “Seek help through Allah and be patient. Indeed, the earth belongs to Allah. He causes to inherit it whom He wills of His servants. And the [best] outcome is for the righteous.”
Jews are no longer G-d chosen people. The Israelites did not keep their part of the covenant. Here is the evidence:
Jeremiah 31:31-34:
“Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.”
It had already been prophesized in the Bible that the descendants of Ishmael/Arabs shall administer the Temple Mount/Jerusalem.
Isaiah 60:7
"All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory."
All the flocks of Kedar - On the word 'Kedar,' see the notes at Isaiah 21:16. The Kedarenians were a wandering tribe that frequently changed their residence, though it is probable they usually dwelt in the south part of Arabia Desert, or the north of Arabia Petraea. They are mentioned as dwelling in beautiful tents Sol 1:5 : 'I am black, but comely as the tents of Kedar,' see Psalm 120:5; compare Isaiah 21:16-17; Isaiah 42:11. The language here also means that that which constituted their principal wealth would come and enrich Jerusalem.
The rams of Nebaioth - Nebaioth was also a son of Ishmael Genesis 25:13; 1 Chronicles 1:29, and was the father of the Nabatheans. They were a people of Arabia Petraea, and lived principally by plunder, trade, and the keeping of flocks. The country of Nabathea extended, it is supposed, from the Euphrates to the Red Sea, and embraced Petra, the capital of Arabia Deserts, and also Medaba. It is not possible, however, to fix the exact boundaries of the various tribes of Arabians. The general idea is, that their most valuable possessions would be devoted to God.
The second Temple had been completely destroyed as predicted by Jesus in Luke 21:5-38. For 500 years or more, it had been left in ruins by the Jews. When Umar Ibn al-Khattab, the second caliph of Islam, captured Jerusalem in 638 CE, there was not a single Jew in Jerusalem. Now, as prophesized by Isaiah, Jerusalem is administered by descendants of Ishmael/Arabs.
Dome of the Rock is the Third Temple. There are some interpretations of the Bible that suggest that the construction of the Dome of the Rock is prophesied in the Book of Daniel. Specifically, some people believe that Daniel 12:11 is a prophecy about the building of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. "And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days." [Daniel 12:11]
Rabbi Isser Weisberg of Machon Mishne Torah in Lakewood, explained that the “appalling abomination” spoken about in the Book of Daniel is the Dome of the Rock on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, which was completed in the year 692. Counting 1290 (a thousand two hundred and ninety) years from the completion of the Dome of the Rock “you get 1982 and the 1335 (one thousand three hundred and thirty-five) ends in 2027. So that’s the window (1982-2027) when the Moshiach has to come.”
This may confirmed the Qur'anic message. In Qur'an 17:104 says "And We said to the Children of Israel after Pharaoh, “Reside in the land, but when the promise of the Hereafter comes to pass, We will bring you all together.” The modern state of Israel was promised by British and its allies and not by G-d. In ancient Israel, G-d had prepared Moses for 80 years to lead His people Israel. 1948+80= 2028 may be the complete systematic dismantling of the modern state of Israel by God All-mighty.
It is a heresy/unholy to think that Jews shall administer Temple Mount/Jerusalem as it had been clear in the Holy scripture that descendants of Ishmael/Arabs had been ordained by G-d to administer Jerusalem/Temple Mount.
In Hebrew Bible, Devarim 32:17 reads as follows:
"They sacrificed to demons, not God, to gods they had not known, new gods that had come recently, whom your ancestors had not feared".
The medieval commentator Ibn Ezra suggested that the “new gods” mentioned in this verse were actually the gods of foreign nations that the Israelites had come into contact with.
"new gods" is today's Zionism. Zionism is a nationalist movement that emerged in the 19th century to enable the establishment of a homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine. The movement initially emerged in Central and Eastern Europe as a national revival movement in the late 19th century, both in reaction to newer waves of antisemitism and as a consequence of Haskalah, or Jewish Enlightenment. Since the establishment of Israel, Zionism became an ideology that supports “the development and protection of the State of Israel”.
One cannot deny that the conflicts in the middle-east is caused by the Zionism movement and the violations of the 3 Oaths made by the Jews found in the Talmud (Song of Songs 2:7, 3:5, 8:4):
The Oaths:
First Oath: Israel should not ascend to the land in a wall (i.e., en masse or forcefully).
Second Oath: The Holy One adjured Israel not to rebel against the nations of the world.
Third Oath: The Holy One adjured the nations not to oppress Israel excessively.
Jews worldwide are now paying the price for the violations of the 3 Oaths
Zionism ("new gods") is only around 100 years old. It is the transformation from religion to nationalism, to materialism created by non-religious Jews who hated their religion. The reason why they use the name Israel, the Star of David, hijacking, stealing the identity of Judaism and the Jewish people is in order to gain a legitimacy for their existence that should lead people to say, 'oh, it is God given to them' and that they should use fear and intimidate people from speaking out against their actions because they will call those that do anti Semitic; it couldn't be anything further from the Truth.
Leviticus 26:18
“And if ye will not yet for all this hearken unto me, then I will punish you seven times more for your sins.”
Qur'an 62:5
"The example of those who were entrusted with the Torah and then did not take it on is like that of a donkey who carries volumes [of books]. Wretched is the example of the people who deny the signs of Allah. And Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people."
@@HusseinDohaIsrael doesn’t govern the WB. Try again
@@malvolio01Israel controls the West Bank in everything but “name” be for real
Send them home!!!!!
Senators Hawley, Cruz and Kennedy are the most intelligent senators there. I love listening to them.
Whatever the outcome of the war against hamas…….this has highlighted the world of anti Jewish sentiment and hatred across the world. Both politically and publicly, a blinding light has been shone into the putrid darkness of racism and hatred of certain ethnic groups and faiths. It’s been absolutely shocking but essential to see this unfolding everywhere across the globe.
Well said. Sadly.
May Jesus come soon.
Hawley, Cruz and Kennedy are 3 guys that you don't want to mess with.
Because they are foreign agents
Yeah because they are baugbt By Israel wow
Agree, they are so corrupt by your tribe
Because Israel pays them
This is just unreal.....!!!!
The fact he won't condemn the statement gives you your answer, it's a simple yes or no question. I suppose we should be thankful that he did say he did condemn it publicly, but then supports it privately, seem that sort of think in the past, people(s) pretending to be against something but secretly support it. Hell countries, big corporations condemn things all the time, then you find out they have been secretly funding the thing they publicly condemn, then say it never happened.
Why should he condemn, it's an accurate statement.
@@jamescook4402I'm wondering also, let's ask Cruz and Hawley if they condemn what Israel has done to Palestinians for the last 50 or so years.
If he asked me if Israel has and still is using violence for colonialism, I can answer the question yes, I know the history though. It would be irresponsible to answer that question yes or no if you do not know the history.
Zionist Leader David Ben-Gurion what did he say about creation of Isreali ? “If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?”
David Ben-Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121.
“Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves … politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves… The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country. … Behind the terrorism [by the Arabs] is a movement, which though primitive is not devoid of idealism and self sacrifice.”
- David Ben Gurion. Quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky’s Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan’s “Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech.
“We must do everything to insure they (the Palestinians) never do return.”
David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar’s Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157.
Ben Gurion also warned in 1948: Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes: “The old will die and the young will forget.”
“We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai.”
David Ben-Gurion May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, a Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.
“If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel.”
Ben-Gurion (Quoted on pp 855-56 in Shabtai Teveth’s Ben-Gurion in a slightly different translation).
“It’s not a matter of maintaining the status quo. We have to create a dynamic state, oriented towards expansion.” -Ben Gurion
“Every school child knows that there is no such thing in history as a final arrangement - not with regard to the regime, not with regard to borders, and not with regard to international agreements.”
- Ben Gurion, War Diaries, 12/03/1947 following Israel’s “acceptance” of the U.N. Partition of 11/29/1947 (Simha Flapan, “Birth of Israel,” p.13)
“We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population? ‘Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said ‘ Drive them out! ‘ “
Yitzhak Rabin, leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979.
Partition: “after the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the state, we will abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine “
- Ben Gurion, p.22 “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan.
“The acceptance of partition does not commit us to renounce Transjordan. One does not demand from anybody to give up his vision. We shall accept a state in the boundaries fixed today - but the boundaries of Zionist aspirations are the concerns of the Jewish people and no external factor will be able to limit them.” P. 53, “The Birth of Israel, 1987” Simha Flapan
October, 1936, during the Jewish Agency Executive meeting Ben-Gurion arguing in favor of transfer as a policy, he said “We are not a state and Britain will not do it for us…” although “there is nothing wrong in the idea.”
“If it was permissible to move an Arab from the Galilee to Judea, why it is impossible to move an Arab from Hebron to Transjordan, which is much closer? There are vast expanses of land there and we are over crowded….Even the High Commission agrees to a transfer to Transjordan if we equip the peasants with land and money. If the Peel Commission and the London Government accept, we’ll remove the land problem from the agenda.”
The Arabs, Ben-Gurion claimed, would not become landless as a result of Zionist land acquisition; they would be transferred to Transjordan.
October 29, 1936 the 21 member of the Jewish Agency Executive endorsed the proposal of a transfer of displaced Arab farmers to Transjordan. Only two of the four non-Zionist members opted to dissent.
Flapan, Zionism and the Palestinians, citing protocols of the Executive meeting, p. 261
12 July 1937, Ben-Gurion entered in his diary: “The compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the proposed Jewish state could give us something which we never had, even when we stood on our own feet during the days of the First and Second Temple”
- a Galilee free from Arab population.
Ben-Gurion went so far to write: “We must prepare ourselves to carry out” the transfer [emphasis in original]
27 July 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We have never wanted to dispossess the Arabs [but] because Britain is giving them part of the country which had been promised to us, it is fair that the Arabs in our state be transferred to the Arab portion”
5 October 1937, Ben-Gurion wrote in a letter to his 16 year old son Amos: “We must expel the Arabs and take their places…. And, if we have to use force-not to dispossess the Arabs of the Negev and Transjordan, but to guarantee our own right to settle in those places- then we have force at our disposal.”
“It is very possible that the Arabs of the neighboring countries will come to their aid against us. But our strength will exceed theirs. Not only because we will be better organized and equipped, but because behind us there stands a still larger force, superior in quantity and quality …the whole younger generation of Jews from Europe and America.”
Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p.297-299, p. 330-331.
See also Teveth, Ben-Gurion and the Palestinian Arabs, p. 182-189
Ben-Gurion in an address to the central committee of the Histadrut on 30 December 1947:
“In the area allocated to the Jewish State there are not more than 520,000 Jews and about 350,000 non-Jews, mostly Arabs. Together with the Jews of Jerusalem, the total population of the Jewish State at the time of its establishment will be about a million, including almost 40 percent non-Jews. Such a [population] composition does not provide a stable basis for a Jewish State. This [demographic] fact must be viewed in all its clarity and acuteness. With such a [population] composition, there cannot even be absolute certainty that control will remain in the hands of the Jewish majority…. There can be no stable and strong Jewish State so long as it has a Jewish majority of only 60 percent.”
On the 6th of February 1948, during a Mapai Party Council, Ben-Gurion responded to a remark from a member of the audience that “we have no land there” [in the hills and mountains west of Jerusalem] by saying: “The war will give us the land. The concepts of “ours” and “not ours” are peace concepts, only, and in war they lose their whole meaning”
(Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 6 February 1948. p.211)
Addressing the Mapai Council the following day, Ben-Gurion declared: “From your entry into Jerusalem, through Lifta, Romema… there are no Arabs. One hundred percent Jews. Since Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans, it has not been so Jewish. In many Arab neighborhoods in the west one sees not a single Arab. I do not assume that this will change… What had happened in Jerusalem… is likely to happen in many parts of the country …in the six, eight or ten months of the campaign there will certainly be great changes in the composition of the population in the country.”
(Ben-Gurion, War Diary, Vol. 1, entry dated 7 February 1948. p. 210-211)
And two months later, Ben-Gurion speaking to the Zionist Actions Committee on 6 April, Ben-Gurion declared: “We will not be able to win the war if we do not, during the war, populate upper and lower, eastern and western Galilee, the Negev and Jerusalem area….I believe that war will also bring in its wake a great change in the distribution of the Arab population.”
[Ben-Gurion, Behilahem Yisrael, Tel Aviv, Mapai Press, 1952, pp. 86-87]
Ben-Gurion wrote in his diary on 12 July 1937: “the compulsory transfer of the Arabs from the valleys of the projected Jewish State…. We have to stick to this conclusion the same way we grabbed the Balfour Declaration, more than that, the same way we grabbed at Zionism itself.”
(Ben-Gurion, Zichronot [Memoirs], Vol. 4, p. 299)
Senator Hawley is awesome 👍 🏴
Yeah except no one punishes discrimination against ‘non’ jewish caucasians. Ever. Not a peep.
Btw ashkenazi jews are genetically Northern italian. They settled in germany in the early 1500s. And in the 1850’s jewish academics formulated and spread socialism and communism. Funded it. And ultimately brought it to the USA and proliferated and difussed it through movies. Music. Culture. Politics.
Where is hawly’s vitriol and heated rhetoric? Anything. Where is it. Ask yourself honestly
Is this really your guy? Of all the guys in all the world, you're picking... this...
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat he can be awesome without being ‘your guy’. I get that you’re attempting to be clever. Failing isn’t wise. You’re omitting that you likely support and vote for people you’ve never vetted or skeptically criticized. People who form your beliefs, which are inevitably cartoonish low resolution jelly brain filtered abstracts of political theater, which is what this was. My criticism was actually informed by an actual education. And the ability to think independently of anyone or anything.
To your point whatever your ‘guy’ is, try gathering real knowledge, by actually pursuing it. Not having topical media beats flood your already limited cognitive resources with social engineering by a corrupt and now adversarial federal government that you scarcely understand. But by developing an actual intellect with research including all that the modes of transmitting mediums of ancestral knowledge by reading original sources and compiled analysis of it. Then cross reference all cultures, religions, across known history and you’ll understand the precise framework for the present guiding philosophies, legal theories, and constitutional morphism we now see, in contrast with say the guidelines of the federalist papers. Read the philosophies of john locke. Look now at a congress plying the easily manipulated into seeing only the distraction, not the misdeeds we all know Washington for decades has been culpable of. Read of similar intrigue and betrayal at the highest levels of histories greatest civilizations. Ponder the cost of decadence and complacency. The lack of seriousness inherent in your comment here.
Try it. Think
@@azurebadger Youre trying to sound intelligent while standing up for a grand-standing **politician** making a show for social media trying to ask a **District Court Judge** nominee what his opinion is of a war that is 6000 miles away from the US 3rd Circuit and has literally nothing at all to do with confirming a judge.
This nominee isn't "dodging" his questions like ya'll are saying. He's literally confused. He's completely befuddled why this politician is asking a Judge about foreign policy.
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoat everyone knows something about that situation 6000 miles away. He was on the board of what again?
Heisnt confused. Its called filibustering. Have you never listened to these hearings before? Or any politician in similar circumstances ever? I recently read an account of this political ambiguity dance in Rhodesia in the 70’s. Same exact thing.
Are you trying to sound smart? I however can predict the simplicity of your every opinion. By all means continue oif you want your belief system dramatically rearranged, as if you could endure it.
You missed all of my points. You simplified all framework on the matter and rendered a shallow rationalization. Thats the proper definition of what you attempted. Thats something that belies the issue i spoke to. You have your remedy. Get on with it and stop wasting time talking to people you scarcely comprehend let alone possess the power to persuade. Again you didnt catch my meaning. And the first comment here was mine and you couldnt see it, so devastating was my critique of thetheatrics of congress apparently. Thats something you should note.
Off you go
I have never once heard one of these Democrats answer with a yes or a no.
A member of an academic board can't make a yearly meeting at the university? Dang, too busy or lazy or indifferent?
Oh my gosh...he wouldn't even agree that Jewish Americans and students have the right to live without fear
they dont
@@wallytron2563 So in your opinion, Jews have no right for security and safety?
He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.
@@wallytron2563 EVIL PERIOD UR. ( TRUMP2024)
@wallytron2563 soon you won’t either with that kind of response
IF you can't or won't answer the questions, then you don't vote for them.....simple.
Keep this guy from getting a government job !!!
Who josh
Foreign allegiance - he should NOT be an employee of the Federal Government
The only importance to them is Islam… He’s proved he won’t answer any questions.
Yes
@@MrNewAmericanAll your top officials in the WH & State Department are double Nationality Amiracan - Isreali. 90% they work with Isreal
Wowwww he couldn’t even say they deserve to be safe in their environment
i guess he just felt thats a stupid question. waste time is this stupid arguments.
They are not giving him a choice. They want “yes” or “no”
On occupied territory and denying the indigenous of their rights. Would have to do to the Palestinians what America did to the native Indians to feel safe
@@seanrambarran2323 educate yourself - the land is Jewish land
While 10,000 Palestinian children are butchered?
I love Senator Hawley ❤
Absutely NO to this nominee! I do not trust him in any way! He is deceitful! He won't answer a simple yes or no question it is a NO!!
They are all like that. They will give you a word salad answer that actually answers nothing. In my opinion they pick the guy who can answer without actually answering anything.This is like a test to see if they stand up to questioning under pressure. This is an initiation not a hearing.
No to this individual.
@Judahkings unlike your simple minds he realises things are more complicated and myprejudicede decisions he could be making in the futur, which could lead people to claim bias on one side or the other.
@@Ugskdjrdjhdjzsjwjoh what a bunch of crap. He was asking a moral question. It wasn’t difficult to give an answer, and an advanced knowledge of Middle Eastern geopolitics is not needed to provide a moral answer.
@@Ugskdjrdjhdjzsjwj So, supporting Terrorists is now moral? Because honestly if you don't support or defend Israel, and you agree with Hamas than you are supporting Terrorists and continued Terrorism.
Hmmmmmmm.......🤔
Being Pakistani - even as a judge - is an excuse now for ignorance.. wow....
That's the answer on why he can't support it - he is Pakistani 😂
@@juventus23that was my thought as well.
Think about it from his perspective. This line of questioning was bizarre and completely unorthodox. Given that he's Pakistani, it was perfectly reasonable for him to wonder if Hawley thinks he's from the Middle East and has a personal connection to the current conflict, which he does not.
@themaskedman221 think about it from this perspective, muslims only see atrocities when it is a non Muslim involved. Do you know Saudi killed 200k+ Muslims in Yemen or the fact that Iran is committing atrocities against its own citizens? Where was this condemnation against Saudi then? Don't act naive and don't expect these people to act naively. It is all for the Ummah. That's the name of this game
@@juventus23 What does this guy have to do with any of that? There is a danger here of tarring all Muslims with the same brush.
Why does a USA senator state that "I am. Pakistani"...... 🤔
He isn’t a senator, he’s a nominee for judge.
@cdrone4066 thank god for that, the Kafirs better watch out though.
??????
@@cdrone4066shouldnt be a US judge then, send him back to Pakistan if he wants a job so bad
Well he's talking about his blood that's flowing through his body. That's like saying you're Irish or you're Mexican doesn't necessarily mean you're from Mexico or you're from Ireland and you believe that you are Irish and you have no loyalty to the United states. But I wouldn't doubt it in this guy's case because all these crooked corrupt politicians judges and school academics are corrupt
It's clear he is ashamed of what he has been caught involved in.
What was he involved in?
Yes,yes,yes
Nominee : "If I answer the way you want, you will see my nose grow. If I answer honestly, you will see my horns"
Brilliant!!! Too funny!!!
And the stench of sulphur emanating from my pores. 👹
Lol
Not even I could come to that high level of humor as you and I consider myself to have a higher sense of humor than those good for nothing late night TV talk show hosts humor.
Nice one lol!
The paradigm of the collegiate authority is chaos and no moral judgement.
It is very disgusting to use holocaust to justify the savage Israeli crimes against innocent Palestinian people and blackmail any one say the truth about israeli occupation and i think 7 October was the reaction to all atrocities to the Palestinian people for more than 70 years
Why is Hawley a Great Defender of Jewish Americans, and Schumer ( the Jew) is Not! Very puzzling. Not a rhetorical question. I would Greatly appreciate a reasonable explanation. Thanks
Hawley is showing no mercy to these worthless affirmative action nominees.
He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.
@@monotech20.14 Please explain how he answered it .....will wait.
@@monotech20.14 No he did not answer it. He refused to answer it. Did you not understand that he would not answer the question.
@@brianmcgovern9005 And this is just another crud that will be added to the swamp. This guy is a stain on America.
@@blintzkreig1638 Did you not "understand" I was commenting to another person. Do you understand much?
Josh Hawley for President!!
Lol haha
Yes!
Does he practice, not answering questions, with the university presidents?
It's not an inability, Josh; it's an unwillingness. He certainly could, and pretends he thinks it could (perhaps) be merited, but WILL NOT.
He did answer. Sorry that you didn't understand it.
What does Israel having a right to exist have to do with the US third-circuit court?
@@twelvecatsinatrenchcoatExactly!
Why is there foreigners that can barely speak English in our government?
All they do is lie❤
Like trump
All I have heard from Biden is lies.
Like Biden.
Or create a narrative to fit their agenda like the senator
I like how one of his defenses was “I am from Pakistan” and therefore he doesn’t know anything or need to know. Good, go back to Pakistan then. This isn’t acceptable here.
That’s your opinion!
@@HopefulInterventionsthe whole country of pakistan doesn't recognise ISRAEL as a country
@@vikashkumar-vk3im True! They don’t recognize Armenia either.
Love your great brave attitude Senator Hawley!🇺🇸🇮🇱🇺🇸🇮🇱
He ought to run for president
I love Senator Josh Hawley for calling out these corrupt LIARS.
✡️🕎🔯💪😎
Watching academics and nominees getting grilled never gets old. Hawley is a master chef and Adeel Abdullah Mangi is extra crispy.
Adeel Chicken
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Burnt to a crisp.
Who is M. Mangi?
SHOW YOURSELVES! WE ARE WATCHING.
This man has no business even being considered for a judicial post. He will not and cannot have a backbone required to make a decision.
Foreign allegiance - he should NOT be an employee of the Federal Government
Why should he have an opinion on this matter. Why fo iou have Israel as the center of the universe. It is of no essence.
But Israel is an occupying settlement. What has the USA got to do anything with that
Yes
Wrong. He will always make a decision and will always have an eternal bias against good and moral decisions.
I agree with the statement 💯 percent.
👍
I sure as hell hope they do not put him in any position in our government!
Who is “they”? Just curious
“Sir I don’t want to answer that question because I may get my head sawed off if I answer incorrectly…..oh ah I mean..I didnt grow up in the Middle East.”
Absolutely,but if he grew up in Pakistan it might as well be the middle east, they have been hiding terrorists for decades
Why should an American citizen be charged for criticizing a foreign country ? What kind of insanity is this ?
Not any foreign country. Only Israel. That’s the only country you can’t criticize. Israel’s interests are put before the interests of our own country.
He supports organizations that support terrorism and one that has connections to the killing of cops .
Its not about criticizing, its about the affects that it has on society like anti-semitism on college campuses
@@Mondo_mog How many protests on campuses do you see about North Korea, Russia, China, Boko Haram etc? Why the relentless focus on the one Jewish nation on Earth?
Islamist propaganda.
But he is NOT just a citizen, Adeel Abdullah Mangi is a nominee for the US circuit court and just like all others he must undergo hearings!
I love that "OH GOD" at 2:49...who had his microphone open? 😁
It was Magni himself.
@@timothycrespyno it wasn’t, they were actually talking at the same time.
Best part.😂
That was amazing and my exact reaction.
@timothycrespy no, it wasn't. He was actually responding at the time.
My 2 favorite Senators!!
How do you get any justice when none of these people ever answer any questions
Wow. Thank you for these words of confrontation. Thank you.
This is the kind of senators we all need in the Senate the way that Josh Hawley is going after this nominee that is probably going to be put on the bench regardless of what the Republicans have to say about it don't you think it's time to change your judicial system to where it's not for the senators to put these judges on the bench for lifetime 10 years the simple fact is I don't think any judge should be have a lifetime tenure except for the supreme Court any other judges that are put on the bench regardless of it being a federal bench or a state court or any other court their limits should be to 4 years an 4 Year's only
judges have to retire at 72
I absolutely agree with you !
I think anyone who does not give a straight answer to a yes or no question should be held in some form of contempt.
Asking someone if "Israel is a violent colonial state" is not straightforward at all. It requires a huge amount of historical knowledge and international law knowledge. You will get vastly different answers from highly intelligent people on both sides. It would be irresponsible to answer that question without being an expert in the long history of the area of the world. Unless you are a dishonest politician. Then all you have to think about is how will this look to my voters.
@dakotaeaslick1733 The problem is that this happens a lot at these things. When they don't want to give an answer, that will be on the record and shows what position they have on a subject. They deflect by not saying yes or no. Also, when they are asked to come to these things, they generally know what the topic is and therefore can prepare. This is not an isolated event. This happens every time the answer to the question may hurt them politically. The issue with Israel should not be that hard to answer for an educated person like him. The fact that a yes answer would hurt him with his peers is enough to make you believe he was deflecting on purpose.
When I am asked a question on a survey I can answer yes, no or not sure.
Oh so the right to remain silent or answer as we choose means guilty now? Ladies and gentlemen there goes your free speech
No politician should work for another country.
Another AIPAC stooge.
Thank you for your service Senator Hawley!!!
I have watched hundreds and hundreds of committee hearing like this and it makes me sick that these people who do NOT care about morality, truth or giving honest answers to anything are never accouintable.
Try watching the lies told by the Trump nominees for the supreme court
You mean Hawley right???
Reason is that they're all retro bates
@@Larryputt1 , What exactly are retro bates? Was that a typo?
@@shatteredteethofgodNo idea what moon you are from, but I watched every second of it. Sorry Listened only.
CLEAR. Thanks Mr. Hawley.
Regardless, we have to continue to be hard on these candidates regardless of the issue/topic/policy. It’s too important
I'm starting to think, people being specifically questioned like this, should HAVE to answer either yes or no or maybe, and then be allowed to qualify their answer afterwards! There's a reason they refuse to answer yes or no!
No shit. But do make them do that. These are wisely cun*s of epic proportions.
They refuse to give direct answers because they under internal pressure from within the organizations they lead.
It's a problem when you have polarized Arab students and lecturers along with radical left bullshit ideologists in the college you lead that will see any tiny bit of empathy towards Jews or the victims of Oct 7 or any tiny bit of maybe some tiny little bit of saying a glimpse of a shred of a comment slightly favoring Israel, as a justification for what they think is a Genocide in Gaza.
They don't hate Jews, they are simply cowards.
But there is no doubt that is. Real is a cruel colonial rule
He answered the question without needing to say no. Don't support him
This guy is dodging the question coz he is afraid he might be a target or something I bet.
Is this guy running to be a judge in Israel.
Why cant these people actually answer a question? I thought they were smart. This proves otherwise!
Adeel Deception, Lying and Taqiyya
Does Islam permit Muslims to lie?
Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other... unless the purpose of lying is to "smooth over differences" or "gain the upper-hand over an enemy."
There are several forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, the best known being taqiyya (the Shia name). These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause of Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.
Does Islam Permit LYING....??? Isn't that found on Page One Verse ONE.......That's what " THEY " do to ALL Non-Believers of al-Lah
What's up with these people using Taqiya as an example for their arguement 😭 ITS ONLY FOUND WITHIN THE SHIAS WHO ARE A MINORITY GET THAT INTO YOUR HEADDDDDD! ITS LIKE COMPARING CHRISTIANS TO CATHOLICS 😭😭😭
@@itswobblypancake7981thankfully neither Christians nor “catholics” encourage lies, in any form or for whatever reason.
@@itswobblypancake7981 Oh we get it.. So what you are saying is that you follow a man who tells you that you can not have friends who does not believe what you believe as in 3:28 and in 5:51 and 60:1 and what is it you have to do to make us think how peaceful you are.. WHEN in REALITY what is it you feel towards the People of the Book... What was it that as one who believes in al-Lah must do towards the Jew when they are hiding behind a Rock...?? Now Are you able to say what the man Muhammad really is..because we have a different name for what he has taught, what those men can do to "the little ones".... and it isn't prophet. Tell the Truth.. if you can that is.............
It's just crazy ! When someone doesn't want to answer obvious and simple questions, it means that it's risky for him to admit the truth. What a shame !
It's not a simple question though!
It’s not exactly obvious and simple … I have followed the conflict as best I can but don’t know how I would answer this
@@alliebirkin8661 The answer is as obvious as Bibi's genocidal intent.
He cldnt answer for fear of his life. No muslim can belie the islamic narrative no matter how false or twisted it is.
@@alliebirkin8661 no disrespect to yourself, but… this guy Knows very well what he should be doing and saying
I wish they would make these people answer a question or be contempt of Congress
That man is obviously avoiding incriminating himself to SOMEONE!!! THE QUESTION IS WHO if not the American people....?
To jews, because they decide who becomes judge...
Excellent Point 👍
It’s what it’s, on point, I totally agree 1000%
pakistani. that says it all for you americans that let him in.
❤Thank you Josh Hawley!!!!
Outrageous 😱
These people do the same thing never answer the questions
Ironically, for a nominee to the bench of a high court of the United States to dodge a direct question in an inquiry and test of facts is a prediction of incompetence in executing his office in the matter, as a referee of adjudication of compelling a witness to answer honestly.
It reminds me of that silly Supreme Court nominee (now judge) who couldn't answer what a woman was.
Yes. I recall the look on her face that said, 'Shit, this guy knows I'm an idiot and he's gonna' prove it!' when she was asked for the definition.@@MrHonk58
I don't see it as incompetence. I see anti-Americanism and anti-Semetism!
He has NO business on a court, or even in America.
None are mutually exclusive of the others. Sometimes I type with my soft hands and sometimes my hard hands.@@joybeum7177
@@joybeum7177 Thank god you people aren't in any position to make those decisions.
I agree with that!!
Josh Hawley. Thank you for what you are doing 🙏🙏
They never answer the question, not once
Absolutely cowards.
Prob doesn’t want to incriminate himself, incase of lawsuits so he coward up instead but i bet he talks a lotta shit and feels like a tough guy when he’s home with his family smh
He was barely given time to answer. Mr Cotton just wanted to hear himself speak for that AIPAC cash money
@@Mdtv1982 Simple yes or no would suffice but dude was beating around the bush at every question, so Hawley interjected to avoid the long and unnecessary answers. It’s interesting to see the different viewpoints tho especially when biased. I’m neutral but even I can see what’s happening here
@@CrackedSociety you can’t respond yes or no to a complicated question which is why he didn’t. He also wasn’t given a second to respond which is why the other member apologized to him
I'm South African, please interview me. 😂😂Vetri South African Indian,seven qualifications, published etc etc know the American Constitution too. Yo, these candidates. Great job Senator.
Being called violent and colonialist isn’t racist. The US and the UK get called that all the time.
Islam is a colonist movement
What makes this absolutely tragic is that they still go ahead and confirm this proud "i am Pakistani" terrorist lover to the judiciary.
You seriously think that Likud are not terrorists?
@@rolandscales9380 Likuid is not related to Osman Bin Laden
He is another sadiq khan
@@simbawanyika4852Good thing being related to him isn't a prerequisite.
@@simbawanyika4852lukid belongs to those who killed 1 million civilians in iraq