This man appreciates how nice the SR series is. I always wanted a Piper Cherokee like the one I trained in until I learned about Cirrus. Great video 👍🏾
@@TheBarzook you have to keep your angle of attack and rotate at the exact right height with the exact proper speed because if not you will float too far or fall too hard on the ground and might hit the propeller/break the engine.
As a SR-20 owner. It’s a great plane, biggest draw back is the hot weather performance, and performance with 3-4 on board. It is definitely not an entry to the jet world.
@@mojogrip I have flown a g7 and my g1 and been in many corporate jets that have a Honeywell suite. Unless you’re lucky enough to get a brand new jet, the avionics suite doesn’t prepare someone to fly a completely different type of aircraft. I’d learn to fly the plane first then deal with all the screens after I’m experienced enough in that aircraft’s capabilities. I’ve been flying since 2004, seen a lot of change in avionics technology in just 20 years time but a jet with steam gauges still flies the same as a jet with a G5000
@@ChiliStyles right and my experience going through the flow of the G7 was identical to flying in the Honda Jet and SF50. The plane has features I've only seen in light jets, hence the comparison. Of course A pilot still has to check all the boxes with training and hours. But anyone who builds time with this avionics suite should find a easier transition.
Would rather have G500 touch screen PFD and MFD or even G3X. Also wish Cirrus would adopt full FADEC and ditch the mixture management once and for all.
The main problem with the SR-20 is that its real-world performance, especially with four people onboard or otherwise close to max gross weight, tends to be quite poor. Climb is bad especially in hot weather due to cooling, and makes it incapable of excelling at XC operations particularly out west.
"Notorious" was obviously used as a figure of speech... Also, Re listen to what he said: Single engine or rather single pistons. Indicating single piston engined planes
@@haroldpierson5271 "single engine piston" is the correct term; "not single engine, single piston!" Notorious mean bad! I didn't hear one bad thing about that plane.
This man appreciates how nice the SR series is. I always wanted a Piper Cherokee like the one I trained in until I learned about Cirrus. Great video 👍🏾
Nice plane mike and thank you for showing us your review very nice
Turn the instruments on, take pic, turn the instruments back off… carry on. 😃
Nice work Mike!
😃
man, this is beauty
Oh, thank god. I thought you were about to say that this thing was turboprop.
perfecto
Very nice airplane 👍🏻
What does this single engine airplane have to do with entry into jet world
Exactly my thought. No retract, no de-ice, no cabin pressurization and not the speed.
Same avionics as the Vision Jet
Also the way you land it is closer to how you will land a jet than a Cessna or Piper
@@nYatYm Can you explain how?
@@TheBarzook you have to keep your angle of attack and rotate at the exact right height with the exact proper speed because if not you will float too far or fall too hard on the ground and might hit the propeller/break the engine.
Top relax airplane, super Video, merci.
As a SR-20 owner. It’s a great plane, biggest draw back is the hot weather performance, and performance with 3-4 on board. It is definitely not an entry to the jet world.
Do you fly a G7? Entry into the jet world has more to do with the avionics and tech in the G7.
@@mojogrip I have flown a g7 and my g1 and been in many corporate jets that have a Honeywell suite. Unless you’re lucky enough to get a brand new jet, the avionics suite doesn’t prepare someone to fly a completely different type of aircraft. I’d learn to fly the plane first then deal with all the screens after I’m experienced enough in that aircraft’s capabilities. I’ve been flying since 2004, seen a lot of change in avionics technology in just 20 years time but a jet with steam gauges still flies the same as a jet with a G5000
@@ChiliStyles right and my experience going through the flow of the G7 was identical to flying in the Honda Jet and SF50. The plane has features I've only seen in light jets, hence the comparison. Of course A pilot still has to check all the boxes with training and hours. But anyone who builds time with this avionics suite should find a easier transition.
@@mojogripgood content though. I always like to see a Cirrus review.
Great planes but the side stick I don’t like.
You should have reviewed the back seat. This is extremely important. It looked cramped to me.
Fun flying $$$$
This plane looks alright, probably, idek.
Would rather have G500 touch screen PFD and MFD or even G3X. Also wish Cirrus would adopt full FADEC and ditch the mixture management once and for all.
Isn't rear prop better?
If you have a rear engine to go with it…😃
You might be fanboying :)
You lost me at no D Icing.
The main problem with the SR-20 is that its real-world performance, especially with four people onboard or otherwise close to max gross weight, tends to be quite poor. Climb is bad especially in hot weather due to cooling, and makes it incapable of excelling at XC operations particularly out west.
As a sr-20 owner I’ll agree, hot weather performance sucks. The air inlets are small
How can i get a discovery flight on a cirrus without spending 1k lol
I don't particularly care for side sticks
You PAY for the details.
C'mon Mike, "single piston?" Sirrus is "notorious?" I hate to be one of the viewer that pose negative comments, but you gotta do better, pls.
"Notorious" was obviously used as a figure of speech...
Also, Re listen to what he said:
Single engine or rather single pistons.
Indicating single piston engined planes
@@haroldpierson5271 "single engine piston" is the correct term; "not single engine, single piston!" Notorious mean bad! I didn't hear one bad thing about that plane.
BMWs are pretty unreliable. Just sayin.