Operation Barbarossa was an operation that resulted in multiple battles. Such as the battle of kharkiv (1st). So you wouldn't say that the largest operation in history was just a battle. Its not called The Battle of Barbarossa also because Barbarossa was a code name and not a place as is common when the Definite Article "The" is used. Good effort with all of this and good result.
Great content. Keep it up. Still a fan of the T43. It had strikes against it due to the invasion and need to concentrate on what could be produced in the highest numbers without retooling, so T34 was what the Soviet Red Army had, rather than that which it wished to have. I feel T43 it was the better vehicle. It specifically addressed flaws in T34's hull and suspension design, and added that efficiency improving dedicated loader to the turret. T34/85 did not address the well known existing T34 chassis issues, which were significant, especially with the bigger, taller, turret adapted from the T43. Flight of fancy. Were I a young nation struggling against her nearby enemies I might've preferred purchasing T43 tanks over US M3 and M4, UK Crusader, or Panzers III und IV. Obviously, they can be upgunned at need. And the F34 could manage against any of those competitors. Wish I knew if they'd improved turret layout on the 25pdr armed AC Sentinel, 'cause that'd be worth looking into, also. Considering the later US M45 (Pershing armed with a 105mm gun/howitzer) it might've been useful for its HE effect.
Any questions and suggestions on what i could cover in another video answer in this comment below
Operation Barbarossa was an operation that resulted in multiple battles. Such as the battle of kharkiv (1st). So you wouldn't say that the largest operation in history was just a battle. Its not called The Battle of Barbarossa also because Barbarossa was a code name and not a place as is common when the Definite Article "The" is used. Good effort with all of this and good result.
Good shit, I'm glad I've found this channel. Keep it up bro
TANKS, alot😉👍!!!
Great content. Keep it up.
Still a fan of the T43. It had strikes against it due to the invasion and need to concentrate on what could be produced in the highest numbers without retooling, so T34 was what the Soviet Red Army had, rather than that which it wished to have. I feel T43 it was the better vehicle. It specifically addressed flaws in T34's hull and suspension design, and added that efficiency improving dedicated loader to the turret. T34/85 did not address the well known existing T34 chassis issues, which were significant, especially with the bigger, taller, turret adapted from the T43.
Flight of fancy.
Were I a young nation struggling against her nearby enemies I might've preferred purchasing T43 tanks over US M3 and M4, UK Crusader, or Panzers III und IV. Obviously, they can be upgunned at need. And the F34 could manage against any of those competitors.
Wish I knew if they'd improved turret layout on the 25pdr armed AC Sentinel, 'cause that'd be worth looking into, also. Considering the later US M45 (Pershing armed with a 105mm gun/howitzer) it might've been useful for its HE effect.
Good effort mate. I learned something new.keep it up.
You are dooing a good job but ....mate you speak at a snail speed...
Repeats the same information multiple times.
Hey guys if you liked the video theres a button specifically for that.
The dude with brains less than bug's is talking about something that he even does not understand. Funny.
Look it up yourself.