Destroyer losses in World War II

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ค. 2023
  • This video shows countries that lost destroyers in World War II.

ความคิดเห็น • 156

  • @AI-cp1jg
    @AI-cp1jg หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    My my what big guns these destroyers have.

    • @josephgallacher3729
      @josephgallacher3729 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Yeah, poor graphics

    • @LosterwellNongpluh-vu6cg
      @LosterwellNongpluh-vu6cg หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah.. for 5 inchers... can't imagine how big the 18 inch guns would be progected or drawn

  • @josephromance3908
    @josephromance3908 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Those models look more like battleships than destroyers.

  • @Stripedbottom
    @Stripedbottom หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    All of the Swedish destroyers were lost in one go, in an accidental explosion while they were tied up to each other. They did not see actual action as Sweden was not a combatant in WW2. Only one of them was permanently lost however, the other two were raised and repaired.

  • @tigerland4328
    @tigerland4328 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    UK 🇬🇧 & Japan 🇯🇵 the naval equivalents of Germany and the USSR on land

    • @Alex-se3dl
      @Alex-se3dl หลายเดือนก่อน

      USA and Japan may be?

    • @tigerland4328
      @tigerland4328 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Alex-se3dl well no as the UK lost more ships than the USA

    • @TorrentUK
      @TorrentUK วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@tigerland4328 Because it was in the war for two years longer than the US and at one point was the only navy facing the might of the German and Italian navies.

    • @tigerland4328
      @tigerland4328 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@TorrentUK true. The defeat of both the kriegsmarine and the Reggia marina was by and large the doing of the Royal navy.

  • @gregwilliams386
    @gregwilliams386 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Canada, wrong flag. All the ships are not destroyers. Destroyers were never that large or have triple turrets.

  • @sartanawillpay7977
    @sartanawillpay7977 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    The Canadian flag is anachronistic. The maple leaf flag was not designed or adopted before the mid 1960s. Canada used a Canadian version of the Red Ensign during the war.

    • @tazman572
      @tazman572 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      1965 to be exact.

    • @tarechan009
      @tarechan009 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      🇯🇵 is too

  • @pac1fic055
    @pac1fic055 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Ironically, the Japanese destroyer Kamikaze survived the war.

    • @pac1fic055
      @pac1fic055 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@user-gc1lt8dl3j 雪風と神風の駆逐艦は戦争が生き残った。

    • @-Shinonome
      @-Shinonome หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ⁠@@user-gc1lt8dl3j神風も生き残ってますよ

    • @user-fh4bn5df5n
      @user-fh4bn5df5n หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      澤風、汐風、夕風、神風、朝顔、響、初霜、雪風
      凉月、冬月、花月、春月、宵月、夏月
      竹、槇、桐、杉、樫、榧、楓、楢、椿、欅、柳、楡、蔦、萩、柿、椎
      菫、楠、雄竹、初桜、樺、初梅
      とりまこんだけだっけ?

    • @ussr8184
      @ussr8184 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-fh4bn5df5n そうですね

  • @Pilum1000
    @Pilum1000 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    it's look like not destroyers, but cruisers or battleships...

    • @paultaylor9498
      @paultaylor9498 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's just a video not exact ffs

  • @vlost7508
    @vlost7508 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    На эсминцах второй мировой башен с тремя орудиями не было. Мелочь но не приятно.

  • @lewissparrow7417
    @lewissparrow7417 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Two things to mention;1) Japan built alot of large "fleet destroyers" that were formidable surface opponents and in the Long Lance torpedo had one of the best anti-ship weapons but their destroyers had 2 flaws- they were unbelievably vulnerable to air and submarine attack (just Google the submarine USS Harder to see what I mean!).
    2) The Soviets lost 34 destroyers but quite a few of them were to air attack when they had no air cover whatsoever and even then they only sank after taking a real pasting.

  • @nekota5967
    @nekota5967 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The names of Japanese destroyers are all poetic and beautiful, but many of the names don't come across unless you know Japanese.
    YUDACHI” is a (sudden) evening shower (rain) in English.
    Names that are easy to translate
    SUZUTUKI is used in haiku, but is more difficult to translate than YUDACHI.

    • @user-lx9tf1hc4c
      @user-lx9tf1hc4c หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Shimakaze, akizuki, ayanami or hayanami

    • @nekota5967
      @nekota5967 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-lx9tf1hc4c Chandra Bose, Chief Advocate, Indian National Army Tribunal, Delhi
      The victory of the Japanese army impressed the Indians in Asia and enabled them to participate in the fight for their country,
      and enabled them to participate in the fight for their country.
      Kukrit Pramode, former Prime Minister of Thailand
      Thanks to Japan, all Asian countries became independent.
      The mother, Japan,
      She had a difficult childbirth, which damaged her mother's body, but her child was born.
      But her child is growing up well.
      but her child is growing up well.
      Today, the peoples of Southeast Asia can talk with the U.S. and Britain as equals,
      Who is the reason why the people of Southeast Asia are able to talk with the U.S. and Britain on equal terms today?
      It is because of their mother, Japan, who killed her own life for the sake of humanity.
      December 8,
      The mother who showed us this serious thought,
      who showed us this serious thought, made a serious decision with her whole life.
      And on August 15,
      August 15 is the day when our dear mother
      who showed us this serious thought, made a serious decision with all her strength.
      We must not forget these two days.
      Ben Bruce Blakney, Tokyo Trial Lawyer, U.S.A.
      The Allied Powers, who used the atomic bomb, a cruel weapon prohibited by international law, to kill many civilians, were the first to use the atomic bomb in the war.
      The Allies killed many civilians by using the atomic bomb, a brutal weapon prohibited by international law,
      Regarding the mistreatment of prisoners of war,
      Japan's responsibility for the abuse of POWs?

    • @kentayasuda4523
      @kentayasuda4523 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      日本の駆逐艦の名前は、海洋気象現象。
      軽巡洋艦は河川名。重巡洋艦は山の名前。

  • @Lifeisalwaysarace
    @Lifeisalwaysarace ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I AM IN ADDICTION WITH YOUR CHANNEL!

  • @renown16
    @renown16 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    the Australian navy lost more than two, we lost, vampire, voyager, waterhen and nizam

  • @user-ov5cw4jk1e
    @user-ov5cw4jk1e หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting and informative video. Any videos i can see on other warship types loses in World War 2? Like battleships, carriers, heavy and light cruisers, subs? Thanks😊

  • @Grandizer8989
    @Grandizer8989 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    My new favorite channel

    • @tazman572
      @tazman572 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd rethink that thought. Many numbers are false.

  • @markpayne2057
    @markpayne2057 7 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    The problem to my mind is that the figures are just the number of destroyers lost, and not the percentage of destroyers that each nation started with, and the percentage of destroyers lost in comparison to the number built during the war. So while the British and Japanese have very high figures for destroyers lost, it doesn’t take into account what percentage this was. So a smaller nation like Greece could lose virtually all of its destroyers, and not build any replacements, whereas Britain could and did lose a large number, but still end up with more destroyers in its service by the close of the war.

  • @chriscollis9315
    @chriscollis9315 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Numbers seem not correct?

  • @user-cr8dl8io5b
    @user-cr8dl8io5b หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Потери эсминцев, а на картинке целые крейсера какие-то.

  • @rascalhusky8129
    @rascalhusky8129 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Interesting as usual. The visual presentation of your videos are stunning. Good job 👏.

    • @tazman572
      @tazman572 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The graphics are terrible. Nowhere close to the real thing.

  • @tazman572
    @tazman572 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Canada lost 24 destroyers in WW2, not 8. The 8 mentioned were lost due to collisions or other accidents, but NOT German U-Boats.

  • @user-hj2mn7bp3d
    @user-hj2mn7bp3d หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    ほとんどアメリカだろうが耐え難きを耐え任務を遂行し散華された先祖に敬礼!

  • @okanolin70
    @okanolin70 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    ridiculous Germany only had 44 destroyers in the whole of WW2, so I really wonder where 9 unbuilt ships are supposed to come from

    • @alganhar1
      @alganhar1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Germany had several classes of large 'Torpedo Boat' which displaced as much, and would have been classified as small to medium sized destroyers in many other navies. Many of the extras likely comes from those ships in part.
      Another is the foreign ships that the Germans captured and pressed into service, which included several destroyers, though most were smaller vessels such as minesweepers and littoral patrol boats.

  • @lalit429
    @lalit429 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Wow greatest creators !!!!
    Amazing! !!

  • @bartoszguszczak8694
    @bartoszguszczak8694 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wait a second. Poland lost 4 destroyers. ORP Wicher. ORP Grom, ORP Orkan, ORP Kujawiak.

  • @user-xi8qs1cd6u
    @user-xi8qs1cd6u หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    что то цифры явно завышены.у Германии не было 53 эсминцев вообще

  • @waynesworldofsci-tech
    @waynesworldofsci-tech หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For anyone interested, HMCS Haida is a museum ship in Hamilton Canada. She is the last surviving Tribal class destroyer.

  • @glenchapman3899
    @glenchapman3899 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I think some of your numbers are pretty suspect. For example you show Germany loosing 53 destroyers in the war. They only ever had 37 total. Australia lost 4 destroyers yet you showed only 2

    • @carloschristanio4709
      @carloschristanio4709 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is ehat I was thinking

    • @carloschristanio4709
      @carloschristanio4709 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Z 52 was paper ship unless they are counting destoryer like ships as well?

    • @carloschristanio4709
      @carloschristanio4709 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wikipedia says 22 but probably not counting the forgien ones

    • @alganhar1
      @alganhar1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Part of the misunderstanding is it very much looks like the larger German Torpedo Boats are included, which is not as stupid as it sounds. The larger German Torpedo Boats were as big as small destroyers in other navies, and in most navies would have been classified as Destroyers despite their relatively poor gun armament.

    • @glenchapman3899
      @glenchapman3899 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alganhar1 Yes I think you might be right. If you also include the Italian torpedo boats they confiscated after Italy left the war you do get pretty close to the number they claim.

  • @ALLAH-AZZAWAJAL
    @ALLAH-AZZAWAJAL ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Who's like peace😊

  • @alexivanov417
    @alexivanov417 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It was necessary to show the losses as a percentage of the total.

  • @SKLxFACTOR
    @SKLxFACTOR ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Bro plz Tell your channel monetize ❓

    • @kowalski6928
      @kowalski6928 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He will never say

    • @zach2382
      @zach2382 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do you see any advertisements if not then it is not monetized and why do care so much

  • @rrkasportreal
    @rrkasportreal ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @explicitcontent68
    @explicitcontent68 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    All these are just somewhere under

  • @xiphoid2011
    @xiphoid2011 หลายเดือนก่อน

    all understanding, including columbia (which joined on the allied side), except how the heck did Sweden lose 3 destroyers without fighting anyone?

  • @masasimada4585
    @masasimada4585 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    アメリカが意外と少ないのとイタリアは意外と多いね😲

  • @Kriptomaniya903
    @Kriptomaniya903 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🚢🧨🔥

  • @allandapenhacosta8053
    @allandapenhacosta8053 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Total: 648 Destroyers

  • @whitewolf-xf9ui
    @whitewolf-xf9ui หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a Canadian I know of three destroyers off the top of my head the Ottawa the Saint Croix and the athabascan (--- doubt I spelled this right
    What are the other ones anyone know?

  • @geoffburrill9850
    @geoffburrill9850 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I think that they have classed any surface ship as a destroyer. The R.N. at the start of w.w.2 was the biggest navy in the world and could absorb the losses whereas Japan could not.

    • @nekota5967
      @nekota5967 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      April 19, 1951. At a joint session of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, Army General Douglas MacArthur, who occupied and ruled Japan as Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers (SCAP), concluded his half-hour farewell address by saying.
      You have to understand that Japan had a population of nearly 80 million on four small islands.
      'Japan's labor force is potentially the best in terms of both quantity and quality. They built factories, they had labor, but they did not have raw materials. They had no cotton, no wool, no oil production, no tin, no rubber, and nothing else. All of that existed in the waters of Asia."
      If the raw material supply were cut off, there would be 10 to 12 million people unemployed in Japan. That is what they feared. Thus, the motivation that drove Japan to war was largely driven by security needs.
      The audience was stunned. If the testimony is correct, Japan went to war not to invade, but to defend itself. Not only would this undermine the premise of the war as a just war that defeated the aggressor nation of Japan, but it would also make even the Tokyo Tribunal (International Military Tribunal for the Far East) lose its legitimacy.
      More to the point, it could even negate MacArthur's achievement of “democratization” and “demilitarization” during the five years and eight months of occupation and rule of Japan.
      This statement disappointed Republican expectations and provoked outrage. MacArthur's popularity quickly waned, and his presidential dreams were crushed.

    • @alganhar1
      @alganhar1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nekota5967 Kind of falls apart when you look at how the Japanese treated the populations of those places they invaded...
      Not very well is a gross understatement.....

    • @nekota5967
      @nekota5967 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alganhar1 O. Lattimore, Advisor to the Republic of China
      What Japan has accomplished admirably is the complete destruction of the Western colonial empire.
      Japan's admirable achievement was the complete destruction of the Western colonial empire.
      Ms. H. Mears, sociologist, U.S.A.
      (in her book)
      The Tokyo Trials were not justice, but a clear lynching.
      How can we in the U.S. punish Japan?
      I don't understand.
      C. Willoughby, Chief of Staff, GHQ
      The Tokyo Tribunal is the worst hypocrisy in history.
      If the U.S. had been in the same position, we would have fought just like Japan.
      G. Shafieh, Foreign Minister of Malaysia
      Why is Japan apologizing?
      The Japanese, who were as small as Malaysians in that war, drove out the British, who were as big as Malaysians.
      Japanese, who were as small as Malaysians, drove out the British, who were as big as Malaysians, in that war.
      Without Japan, Southeast Asia would not have gained independence.
      To deny the precious sacrifices made by Japan is like looking only in the rearview mirror.
      is like looking only in the rearview mirror.
      Mahathir bin Mohamad, the fourth Prime Minister of Malaysia
      If the Japanese are to be held responsible for the war, it must be before that,
      If we hold the Japanese responsible for the war, what about the responsibility of the Western suzerain states that continued their inhuman domination and deprivation earlier?
      The arrival of Japan freed Japan from colonial rule and brought about modernization."
      Boon Tomo, former Minister of Information of Indonesia
      That war was our war.
      We had to do it.
      But Japan was forced to bear the entire burden of the war, and it drove Japan to the brink of destruction.
      We drove Japan to the brink of destruction.
      I am sorry.
      M. Hatta (father of independence alongside Sukarno)
      Indonesia, a treasure trove of natural resources, was a colony that the Netherlands, a weary suzerain state, could not let go of.
      Indonesia was a colony that the beleaguered Dutch suzerainty could not let go of.
      (Omitted) ...and then became independent.
      (The Dutch demanded a large amount of debt from Indonesia in revenge for its independence.
      Japan took over this debt in the form of wartime compensation.

    • @nekota5967
      @nekota5967 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alganhar1 Chandra Bose, Chief Advocate, Indian National Army Tribunal, Delhi
      The victory of the Japanese army impressed the Indians in Asia and enabled them to participate in the fight for their country,
      and enabled them to participate in the fight for their country.
      Kukrit Pramode, former Prime Minister of Thailand
      Thanks to Japan, all Asian countries became independent.
      The mother, Japan,
      She had a difficult childbirth, which damaged her mother's body, but her child was born.
      But her child is growing up well.
      but her child is growing up well.
      Today, the peoples of Southeast Asia can talk with the U.S. and Britain as equals,
      Who is the reason why the people of Southeast Asia are able to talk with the U.S. and Britain on equal terms today?
      It is because of their mother, Japan, who killed her own life for the sake of humanity.
      December 8,
      The mother who showed us this serious thought,
      who showed us this serious thought, made a serious decision with her whole life.
      And on August 15,
      August 15 is the day when our dear mother
      who showed us this serious thought, made a serious decision with all her strength.
      We must not forget these two days.
      Ben Bruce Blakney, Tokyo Trial Lawyer, U.S.A.
      The Allied Powers, who used the atomic bomb, a cruel weapon prohibited by international law, to kill many civilians, were the first to use the atomic bomb in the war.
      The Allies killed many civilians by using the atomic bomb, a brutal weapon prohibited by international law,
      Regarding the mistreatment of prisoners of war,
      Japan's responsibility for the abuse of POWs?

    • @nekota5967
      @nekota5967 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@alganhar1 Grabai Desai, President, Bar Council of India
      India will soon become independent.
      It was Japan that gave us the opportunity to become independent.
      Thanks to Japan, India's independence was hastened by 30 years.
      We should not forget this debt of gratitude.
      This is not only true of India.
      The same is true for Indonesia, Vietnam, and all the peoples of East Asia.
      The people of India must remember this deeply in their hearts and minds.
      We will cooperate generously with Japan's reconstruction.

  • @Muhammad.88
    @Muhammad.88 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Дуюм коммент 🇹🇯 🙋‍♂️

  • @yamatomushashi5583
    @yamatomushashi5583 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sweden lost three destroyers? I thought the Swedes were neutral like Switzerland at that time.

    • @petergray2712
      @petergray2712 หลายเดือนก่อน

      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A5rsfj%C3%A4rden_disaster#:~:text=Three%20Swedish%20Navy%20destroyers%20were,blow%20to%20the%20Swedish%20Navy.

  • @DavidRichards-mh9rg
    @DavidRichards-mh9rg หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The French Navy weren’t even in the war were they?

    • @niclasjohansson4333
      @niclasjohansson4333 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wake up!

    • @DavidRichards-mh9rg
      @DavidRichards-mh9rg หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The French navy didn’t do much up until the French surrender in June 1940, then they were target practice for the Royal Navy in North Africa when they refused to join the war against Hitler. They then scuttled themselves when the Nazis invaded Collaborationist Vichy France so what did the French navy do in the war except make bottom features on the sea bed?

  • @marcojustino4400
    @marcojustino4400 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Gostaria de saber como a Colômbia perdeu um contratorpedeiro na Segunda Guerra Mundial.

    • @ihninoc
      @ihninoc หลายเดือนก่อน

      Consulta acá msmo en youtube, hay unjos videos que muestran lo de Cololmbia en la segunda gerra mundial, incluso alncanzaron a dejar en mal estado un submarino nazi.

  • @wongyc5585
    @wongyc5585 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Italy lose more than the US Navy despite fighting on one front.

  • @user-os6je6rv1u
    @user-os6je6rv1u 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    영국 일본이 섬나라라서 배를 많이 써서 이런건가

    • @tigerland4328
      @tigerland4328 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes and both were under naval blockade during ww2.

  • @maxryabokon1515
    @maxryabokon1515 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Destroyers with battleship gun turrets:)

  • @mikel6502
    @mikel6502 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Germany has no destroyer now

  • @teddystauffer4614
    @teddystauffer4614 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tolle Sache

  • @mirkotorca1950
    @mirkotorca1950 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Germany had very few but some like Bismarck were ahead of its time.

    • @TheLiamster
      @TheLiamster ปีที่แล้ว +22

      They also had the Tirpitz which was sunk. They are battleships not destroyers though

    • @manwithbat
      @manwithbat ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Bismarck is a battleship

    • @Grandizer8989
      @Grandizer8989 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Hitler never understood the value of the Navy (Kriegsmarine). If I were him, I would’ve built more subs and captured the French Fleet in 1940 and turn the Med into his personal swimming pool. That way, Africa would’ve been his.

    • @ATownDown32
      @ATownDown32 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Bismarck was a dogshit Battleship for its time. Outdated scheme , overweight , no deck armor couldn't turn and maintain speed. Waste of steel held up by wehraboo propaganda.

    • @tigerland4328
      @tigerland4328 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ATownDown32I agree

  • @MedallionYT
    @MedallionYT ปีที่แล้ว +8

    How did Japan even have that many destroyers?!

    • @Grandizer8989
      @Grandizer8989 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The DDs were the backbone of the Imperial Fleet. Later in the war, they were more troop/supply transports than fighting ships

  • @francistorchio
    @francistorchio หลายเดือนก่อน

    How did Sweden lose three destroyers since Sweden was neutral in the war?

    • @Escapee5931
      @Escapee5931 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mines?

  • @gksj2info
    @gksj2info ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow

  • @HemlockRidge
    @HemlockRidge หลายเดือนก่อน

    WTF are these ships being shown? They're NOT Destroyers. Just awful graphics, they look like an acid dream. Perhaps the developer should have looked at a picture of a WWII Destroyer.

  • @user-fh4bn5df5n
    @user-fh4bn5df5n หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    駆逐艦、、、、、、????

  • @user-qj8vf4kg3z
    @user-qj8vf4kg3z ปีที่แล้ว +3

    А где данные по СССР?

  • @user-pe6wj5ud2m
    @user-pe6wj5ud2m หลายเดือนก่อน

    Артиллерийские башни на эсминцах конечно мощнецкие. )))

  • @7zmey7
    @7zmey7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    у Италии все выпущенные корабли потонули чтоли?

    • @user-ci4xs8sm8n
      @user-ci4xs8sm8n 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Италия во второй мировой войне , была довольно слаба 🙄 даже Греция ей надрала зад и при этом армия Италии имела численное преимущество над Грецией .
      В отличие от Японии каторая была слаба сухопутной армией она имела на тот момент один из сильнейших флотов мира .
      А Италия таки на суше таки воде были никудышны .
      Вот и их топили так легко .

    • @tigerland4328
      @tigerland4328 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@user-ci4xs8sm8nthe Italian navy was the best of its three services. It's torpedo boats and naval special forces were particularly capable. They were not useless.

    • @tigerland4328
      @tigerland4328 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Almost all of Italy's destroyers were sunk by the British.

  • @Chris.M
    @Chris.M หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pocket battleships? 😂

  • @CorredoYAlexander
    @CorredoYAlexander หลายเดือนก่อน

    XD colombia q paso ?

  • @Patrick_Cooper
    @Patrick_Cooper หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You couldn't find real Destroyers for your video. The ships you use as a model are at least a light cruiser. Do better please I really like your stuff.

  • @Koujuwest
    @Koujuwest หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    広大な植民地を守る為に英国は膨大な艦船を必要としたから上位
    日本は総力戦でほぼ喪失の違い

  • @ahtong1014
    @ahtong1014 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Destroyer with CLs gun

  • @user-eb6so3zv9t
    @user-eb6so3zv9t หลายเดือนก่อน

    16inch gun!!!!!

  • @user-dw9zc9iy2m
    @user-dw9zc9iy2m 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Абсолютне цифры, сами по себе - это не очень интересно, на много информативное, и интереснее отношение общего количества вонвавших к потопленым!

  • @user-sm9xu3nq6v
    @user-sm9xu3nq6v หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    日本はソロモンでネズミ輸送のために酷使されましたから.....。あまりの損失の多さにその後の作戦に支障が出るレベルでしたし。そこで松型駆逐艦をとなったわけですが

  • @750suzuki7
    @750suzuki7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sweden was not a combatant in WWII, Sweden was neutral. You show Sweden with the loss of three destroyers....??

    • @davidkinsey8657
      @davidkinsey8657 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Swedish destroyers lost were the Goteborg, Klas Horn and Klas Uggla. On September 17,1941 an explosion of unknown origins on the Goteborg killed 33 sailors and sank all three ships. Look up the Hjarsfarden disaster for more information.

  • @arwaniahmad9280
    @arwaniahmad9280 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Japan fight alone

  • @MrMensajero
    @MrMensajero หลายเดือนก่อน

    A reino unido los dejaron en lanchas

  • @Animitoria
    @Animitoria ปีที่แล้ว +3

    2nd

  • @user-bq1km5fd2c
    @user-bq1km5fd2c หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Интересно и кто же у "нейтральной" Швеции три эсминца утопил?

  • @user-my7kq9pj3l
    @user-my7kq9pj3l หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    駆逐艦…?
    というか日本が一番多いのは意外だったな…

  • @PradeepKumar-mc8zi
    @PradeepKumar-mc8zi ปีที่แล้ว +5

    1st

  • @user-lj1ck7wn7b
    @user-lj1ck7wn7b 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Should say British Empire not United Kingdom as they include Canadian, Australian losses etc

  • @tangoonrollers
    @tangoonrollers หลายเดือนก่อน

    Australia lost 3 destroyers in WW2

  • @HegyCsill
    @HegyCsill หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Question: Who sank the 57 french and 13 dutch destroyers??? Hahaha!!!! The "allied" UK!!! Where? In Mers-el Kebir, Morocco!!! Hihihi...

    • @user-ds6fd2gk1p
      @user-ds6fd2gk1p หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Операция Катапульта, Англичане отличные союзники!

    • @frednone
      @frednone หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm left in awe by your grasp of history.

    • @andrewstewart9263
      @andrewstewart9263 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, because they were under Vichy French control who were Nazi collaborators & the British didn't want those ships being used by Germany, so they simply had to go as the Vichy French govt refused to surrender them to the Royal Navy.

    • @alganhar1
      @alganhar1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1) There were no Dutch Destroyers in Mers-el Kebir. All Dutch ships that had not joined Free Dutch forces were stationed in the Dutch East Indies where most were lost in action against the Japanese in 1942.
      2) The French did not lose 57 destroyers at Mers-el Kebir. The losses there are well documented. So do try not to lie.