I have been making homemade telescopes for years", if you replace the lens with , say a eye piece from a pair of old binoculars and if you add a prism placing the eyepiece top of the prism, now you can slide the tube back and forth to focus the image you will also find the image will magnify right side up. The main pieces here are the eyepiece and prism. Nice video 2 thumbs up"!
Experimentation is sort of the point. Disassemble an old pair of binoculars, play with those components, search for information about how to identify the components, how they can be measured and profiled, what allows what kind of optical effects. Learn to enjoy the journey, learning is its own reward, because then you will never be without engaging and meaningful activities!
Great, instructive introduction! If you take a note card, cut a neat, round 1-inch hole in it, and place the hole over the front of the front lens, you would probably greatly sharpen the visual image of the moon and reduce the chromatic aberration (fringe colors), just as the quality of an image from a cheap manual camera lens is improved by stopping down or increasing the f/stop. I have also made a fuzzy telescope from a pinhole and an eyepiece to illustrate how the magnification is directly proportional to the distance from the eyepiece divided by its distance from the pinhole, whatever you choose it to be.
I wrote my previous comment before watching the full video ... now i have watched it full.... thank you sooo much for explaining this much about telescopes .. i couldn't find that in internet so i was disappointed.. but you saved me bro 😁
I also built a 20$ refractor telescope (in indian currency. 20×80=1600rupees) except it provides me with 116x optical zoom and it is made from pvc pipes so its pretty durable + it has a focuser too + there is no chromatic abberation in this telescope that i built.
@xorpdnap4246 the focal length is 700mm and the focal length of the second lens ( eyepiece) depends. Like if i want more magnification for planets, i use a 6mm lens i.e. 700/6 = 116x optical zoom. And lets say i want low magnification for deep sky objects, then i would use a 25mm eyepiece i.e. 700/25 = 28x optical zoom. So basically the focal length of the main lens is constant while the focal length of eyepiece changes as per the object
That’s awesome that you are showing people these “low tech” solutions and options for Astronomy. Sadly our hobby is plagued by marketing and its turning people away. Everyone is under the impression that you need all this expensive equipment, when in reality you don’t. And even worse, people have the equipment, and have no idea of how it works. Don’t get me wrong, technology is great, and we are able to do things we could only dreamed of just a few years back. But when you are introducing people to the hobby, this technology can actually turn them away by making them think “they absolutely need ths to do astronomy”.
Chromatic abberation can be completely removed if you take many individual photos with filters of different wavelengths. For each wavelength, use a different focus so that every one converges. Later, you can stack these wavelengths to create your full image.
I'm just impressed you could hold your arms up for so long in front of the camera...!! This would be fun, educational project for kids in a classroom by the way.
this explained more about telescopes than Feynman's lectures on physics, insane... and I watched this for the fun of it cuz I like cameras, not for studying for my exam
Bro i have been watching you for a few months .. and i liked your content really..... and i like this video too ... i would appreciate it if you make more diy videos like this ....... btw i had a question in my mind for a while.... I've seen many astrophotographers including you using mostly refractors or sct .... is there any advantage in using refractor over reflector ? ...
1:31 what he doesnt tell you is singles are trivial (which is in this video), doublets are trivial (because you can buy the optics as a set) but triplets are nearly impossible because its nearly impossible to find them as a set (i hqvnt thus far ) and there is no reasonably explained info on hiw to select the elements individually. I so far have only made a doublet.
I think that you took a photo with the water stamp “astrofalls”, does that mean that it is your picture? Is there any chance I can download the picture in a higher resolution? I really loved how it looked!!
I like how hard he pronounces the T in duct tape, even though duck tape is made from material called duck and it's sticky so it's tape so it's duck tape and it's not made for ducts at all
I have a question and was wondering if anyone could help me. I’m trying to make one of these with my niece and have a 38mm diameter 50mm FL for the eyepiece lens and a 50mm diameter 200mm double convex for the front lens but I can’t see anything. Does my tube need to be a certain length? I switched to a 50mm diameter 200mm double concave eyepiece lens and was able to see the moon but it was blurry, nothing like what he had. Then put the 38mm eyepiece lens back in with a 500mm double convex front lens and got nothing. I’m lost and nowhere near smart enough to understand he was explaining lol.
A bit late here but yes the tube has to be a certain length that is (focal length of objective + focal length of eyepiece) but make sure to make the eyepiece bit slidable to be able to fine-tune the focus
It seems like this is a lot more complicated due to the simple fact that our eyes have lenses of their own. I wonder if you could replace one of the lenses in the telescope with that of your eye… except the eye is effectively already an objective lens focusing onto a sensor… damn, as if the physics of light wasn’t complicated enough on its own
This was part of physics 2 curriculum in US and u fortunately, most students get stuck at physics 1 and never really got to learn about physics 2. 🤦🏻♂️
I have made 2 telescope in my life 1 Refractor and 2nd Dobsonian. From both the telescope i can see planets and enjoy moon with my family. Even captured jupiter and satun by the same telescopea all home made.
Jeez, I was ready to demand this be deleted. After spending thousands on astro gear, you can't come up in here and do it for $20. But it was a good and fun experiment!
Damn it, I was hoping I could buy two cheap magnifying glasses, each the same and built this. Welp shit, I don't know where to get two different style magnifying lens
I think that this was an excellent introduction to optics and a real scientific exploration of how the entire process works. Well done, Bray!
Thanks Fred!
$20 of lenses and cardboard mounted to $2000 specialized astrophotography camera might be just a little overkill imo
I have been making homemade telescopes for years", if you replace the lens with , say a eye piece from a pair of old binoculars and if you add a prism placing the eyepiece top of the prism, now you can slide the tube back and forth to focus the image you will also find the image will magnify right side up. The main pieces here are the eyepiece and prism. Nice video 2 thumbs up"!
Hi! Can you please elaborate on the process on making your telescope and the materials needed.
Yeah can you like make a video, describing the specifics. Please
Experimentation is sort of the point. Disassemble an old pair of binoculars, play with those components, search for information about how to identify the components, how they can be measured and profiled, what allows what kind of optical effects. Learn to enjoy the journey, learning is its own reward, because then you will never be without engaging and meaningful activities!
I was waiting for the auto focus to get it right
"the auto focus"
Great, instructive introduction!
If you take a note card, cut a neat, round 1-inch hole in it, and place the hole over the front of the front lens, you would probably greatly sharpen the visual image of the moon and reduce the chromatic aberration (fringe colors), just as the quality of an image from a cheap manual camera lens is improved by stopping down or increasing the f/stop. I have also made a fuzzy telescope from a pinhole and an eyepiece to illustrate how the magnification is directly proportional to the distance from the eyepiece divided by its distance from the pinhole, whatever you choose it to be.
I wrote my previous comment before watching the full video ... now i have watched it full.... thank you sooo much for explaining this much about telescopes .. i couldn't find that in internet so i was disappointed.. but you saved me bro 😁
Been loving the videos you've been uploading. Keep up the good work!
Thanks, will do!
I also built a 20$ refractor telescope (in indian currency. 20×80=1600rupees) except it provides me with 116x optical zoom and it is made from pvc pipes so its pretty durable + it has a focuser too + there is no chromatic abberation in this telescope that i built.
Can you show the process. Maybe uploading a video would be nice. Thanks
Que marca son las lentes que compraste? Donde las consigo?
@xorpdnap4246 the focal length is 700mm and the focal length of the second lens ( eyepiece) depends. Like if i want more magnification for planets, i use a 6mm lens i.e. 700/6 = 116x optical zoom. And lets say i want low magnification for deep sky objects, then i would use a 25mm eyepiece i.e. 700/25 = 28x optical zoom. So basically the focal length of the main lens is constant while the focal length of eyepiece changes as per the object
@@शशांक1 i dont have a yt channel. Sorry
I made a $5 one which have zero magnification
I think this guy needs to make a $20 auto focus next, because holy shit.
Very cool little project that should be taught in high school science or shop class.
Agreed, would’ve loved to learn about this in physics 1, but sadly it’s only a physics 2 topic in high school in the us
@@astrofalls they taught us how to build diode radios in 8th grade shop class.
I made one a while ago using a postal tube. It worked. I'm tempted to do it again as I now have a 90 mm lens sitting in the cupboard. Used 50 on last.
Perfect for our homeschool unit. Thanks for sharing.
That’s awesome that you are showing people these “low tech” solutions and options for Astronomy. Sadly our hobby is plagued by marketing and its turning people away. Everyone is under the impression that you need all this expensive equipment, when in reality you don’t. And even worse, people have the equipment, and have no idea of how it works.
Don’t get me wrong, technology is great, and we are able to do things we could only dreamed of just a few years back. But when you are introducing people to the hobby, this technology can actually turn them away by making them think “they absolutely need ths to do astronomy”.
Chromatic abberation can be completely removed if you take many individual photos with filters of different wavelengths. For each wavelength, use a different focus so that every one converges. Later, you can stack these wavelengths to create your full image.
You kooked soo young. Vouching for your well-being, Diana. The whole world is.
This is great, I've already got a telescope but I need to try this!
It was definitely fun to do! And having some lenses to use for demonstration is nice to have
Hey what is the difference between eyepiece and a lens used telescopes
thanks so much for taking the time to carefully explain this.
I'm just impressed you could hold your arms up for so long in front of the camera...!! This would be fun, educational project for kids in a classroom by the way.
That was entertaining!✌😎
Thanks joe!
would you see anything if you tightened up the apeture a little?
this explained more about telescopes than Feynman's lectures on physics, insane... and I watched this for the fun of it cuz I like cameras, not for studying for my exam
Thanks for uploading the videos🔭🙏
My pleasure!
Bro i have been watching you for a few months .. and i liked your content really..... and i like this video too ... i would appreciate it if you make more diy videos like this ....... btw i had a question in my mind for a while.... I've seen many astrophotographers including you using mostly refractors or sct .... is there any advantage in using refractor over reflector ? ...
Usually refractors are easier to use and travel with! Some reflectors are better for specific needs, especially when you need a lot of reach or speed
@@astrofalls oh .. thanks a lot bro
i built one before, but it had shorter focal than this one and used my viewfinder's lens with it
Can I use double convex and concave lenses?
WOWWWWW this was a brilliant idia i think this will work i love it❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
you wanted make the maths beginner friendly.... and we skipped that part to make it even friendly....🤣🤣
DIY cardboard telescope - $20.00
Weighted tracker mount - $1000.00
SEEMS DOABLE!
1:31 what he doesnt tell you is singles are trivial (which is in this video), doublets are trivial (because you can buy the optics as a set) but triplets are nearly impossible because its nearly impossible to find them as a set (i hqvnt thus far ) and there is no reasonably explained info on hiw to select the elements individually.
I so far have only made a doublet.
I think that you took a photo with the water stamp “astrofalls”, does that mean that it is your picture? Is there any chance I can download the picture in a higher resolution? I really loved how it looked!!
Focal lens and how much is the diameter🙏
So i see your video at tiktok and i love the Orion nebula
Nice sir! I am waiting for your discovery by the way happy new year belated 🔭❤️
Thanks! Happy new year to you too
You should have added a minus lens to make the image clear ( long distance reading lens)
how did u calculate the distance between the lenses?
I like how hard he pronounces the T in duct tape, even though duck tape is made from material called duck and it's sticky so it's tape so it's duck tape and it's not made for ducts at all
Ok kaneda
I have a very rigid 3 inch cardboard tube, might try this just for fun
Lookin good keep going
I have a question and was wondering if anyone could help me. I’m trying to make one of these with my niece and have a 38mm diameter 50mm FL for the eyepiece lens and a 50mm diameter 200mm double convex for the front lens but I can’t see anything. Does my tube need to be a certain length? I switched to a 50mm diameter 200mm double concave eyepiece lens and was able to see the moon but it was blurry, nothing like what he had. Then put the 38mm eyepiece lens back in with a 500mm double convex front lens and got nothing. I’m lost and nowhere near smart enough to understand he was explaining lol.
A bit late here but yes the tube has to be a certain length that is (focal length of objective + focal length of eyepiece) but make sure to make the eyepiece bit slidable to be able to fine-tune the focus
Impressive ❤
Your Eyepiece lens link seems to be wrong: its neither 50mm diameter, nor 100mm focal length (as you say in the video)
Excellent Explanation
Sir.newspeper 500 meter reeding smoĺl letter which lens pls.500 tell me
It seems like this is a lot more complicated due to the simple fact that our eyes have lenses of their own. I wonder if you could replace one of the lenses in the telescope with that of your eye… except the eye is effectively already an objective lens focusing onto a sensor… damn, as if the physics of light wasn’t complicated enough on its own
Is that a paper tube
Anyone in may 2024?
wow, Tak has a new competitor 😂
This was part of physics 2 curriculum in US and u fortunately, most students get stuck at physics 1 and never really got to learn about physics 2. 🤦🏻♂️
So what if i use 6 lenses
I have made 2 telescope in my life 1 Refractor and 2nd Dobsonian. From both the telescope i can see planets and enjoy moon with my family. Even captured jupiter and satun by the same telescopea all home made.
Did you follow any tutorials ? If yes can you share ?
Puedes mostrarnos un manual donde explique como hacerlo? Como aprendiste a hacerlo?
You sir are criminally underrated.
bravo
*_nice video_*
i think if you really think it though and spend about $100 bucks on the tube materials you may be able to get an okay thing for kids to practice with.
Jeez, I was ready to demand this be deleted. After spending thousands on astro gear, you can't come up in here and do it for $20.
But it was a good and fun experiment!
Name of the lenses ?
Damn it, I was hoping I could buy two cheap magnifying glasses, each the same and built this. Welp shit, I don't know where to get two different style magnifying lens
Now I only need to spend $10000 on other gear.
For 20 bucks you can buy used one like 60mm
I was thinking of doing this, but then I remembered real life exists and I hate chromatic aberration.
Don't underestimate I'm using 40$ Telescope. My quality is far better than 8 inch dobs
Any one in 2024😂
Yes
Me
Me
Me
Yah
Why my image upsidw down
That's how it works , you need to build a reflector
@@__coconut__ we can use a diagonal mirror
SpudScope(TM)
1Lens+Obscure_Conditions+Phone_Camera!
1:30
Hello
APOD
What?
Eu sou o comentário Br que você procura 😃
That's worse than shooting without
1600 rs
That was cool. Jankie, but cool. LOL
after watching how out of focus your video is a 2:22 onward, I don't think I can trust you to show me how to build a telescope.
Telescope 😂 camera ☠️
Just build a simple telescope. Way too much talking.
2025 👍🇬🇧