This video is best video i found on internet related to Hydro-pneumatic fitting. Because in every other video they describe about pitch,tpi,dia which are already available on internet in standard form, but don't tell about the basic difference. After going through this video no doubt will be left over in your mind. Great work 👍 i really liked it.
MS office PowerPoint + Davinci Resolve (to composite) + Photoshop for images correction, But Quality of presentation does not depend on tools. It actually all depends on intention. It should match and support what you want to deliver 👍
3:24 your picture of BSPP shows a tapered thread. And again at the right hand side of 7:52. Just checking that this wasn't intentional? Is there some taper in parallel threads to ease assembly?
Hey, I have clearly said it's a parallel thread. yes, the model is looks not completely parallel, but I have also used parallel lines to make you believe that its parallel.
very good Video, thank you very much. it help me a lot. Do you have video that explain on NPT thread? i always confuse on BSPT and NPT when buying parts and fittings. Many thanks
Very good video. I have one question for clarity. If I have a Female 1/4 G thread and I have a 1/4 RT thread for pneumatic application is this ok to use?
Since you are transferring gas or fluids inside the pipes, the internal diameter plays a huge role (flow/pressures, pressure loss/drop etc.), therefore "size of the thread" is the internal diameter (not exactly, but very close). So it is NOT "just a number" for historically unknown reasons. Metric connections are straight forward - it's literally size of the thread. But in case of tubing/piping/hoses it depends on industry, applications (so nominal number can be external or internal diameter).
Hi, The nominal was originally based on the inner diameter (measured in inches) of a steel tube for which the thread was intended, but contemporary pipes tend to use thinner walls to save material, and thus have an inner diameter larger than this nominal size. But we still denote the size in inner diameter in inches, just because of history (Inner dia is equal to BSP Thread size, which is not relevant these days.) But yes i haven't explained this in video just to avoid confusion. (Always refer the standard table of thread) And i directly said it's a historical legacy
Just for wording clarity- Historical legacy doesn't mean- unknown reason. There was a reason (this is why they were using it) but not relevant today. But we are still using it just because of history.
As an American the reason we use NPT has to do with the whole milk before or after tea debate. We dont take our tea like that..... "What? Well, how do Americans like their tea then?" I hear you wondering after that totally not obvious set up. The answer is.... ...We like our tea... 🕶 SALTY!!!! 🦅😎 [eagleScreech-explosions-fireworks-barbeques-freedom-and-rockMusic.mp4]😁
@@mastermechanicaldesign🤣 😉 BTW, cool video mate. Im queueing up your thrust bearing one now, and your bearing series seems relevant to a telescope mount rebuild/upgrade project Ive been fiddling with. I dig the simple but not simplistic format. There is a HUGE vacuum of content between beginner/novice levels and knowledgeable craftsmen level that tends to leave people in a rut of knowing just enough to be dangerous but having nothing to learn the next level in planning design steps, reasonings on choices for a given part, or component selection, etc. All we usually get is 'just buy this one' never a 'okay, why not that cheaper one' or 'I dont have those, but I have these almost exactly the same ones' explanation. Case and point, the not using tapered threads and adding an O-ring on hydraulics (I mean, I know why, having worked in a machine shop for animatronics a long time ago (mainly in tool making, ie molding and casting, but also some electrical/mechatronics and the odd trip to the mills to make a linkage or two), you dont want a 3000psi pinhole leak.....literally anywhere, so seal it up good. Dont trust what looks okay, air (gases) is not fluid, fluid is not air, do it right. Those SOPs exist for a reason. But without going into that whole subject of pressurized fluid dangers the correct fittings were...) explained quickly and clearly. Looking forward to checking out your backlog of content. Keep on keeping on man! 😎👍
Thank you so much 🤗, i really appreciate that you give time to write such great feedback ☺️ and people like you really inspiring me to give myself 100% in content.
This video is best video i found on internet related to Hydro-pneumatic fitting. Because in every other video they describe about pitch,tpi,dia which are already available on internet in standard form, but don't tell about the basic difference. After going through this video no doubt will be left over in your mind. Great work 👍 i really liked it.
I'm so glad 😊
As a "North American", I found out quite a lot from the video. Awesome, clear information
Very enthusiastic knowledge. Keep it 💯
❤️❤️
Thank you so much for your video ! It just saved me !!
Many thanks from France !!
You most welcome
Very useful.. thanks for the information...
Most useful content provided by you sir❤️ lage raho
Thank you so much 😊
Many thanks for your clear explanation
Yes we need this types of more vidieo❤
Sure 😊
its very useful for me brother....thanks for the video...
You welcome 🤗
Nice Video Explanation. Thank you for sharing.
I'm so glad 😊
thank you verymuch
You most welcome ❤️
Nice video! It was way more detailed than I originally expected it to be, but it was really interesting.
Glad to hear it!
super explanation sir
Awesome content nice video.....
Thank you so much Srinivasan
This is like hidden treasure opened 😊😊
😊
thaanks for awesome video brother keep up the good work
Thank you 😊
Thank yo so much for sharing your knowledge brother. This is priceless.
My pleasure! 😊
Bro could you tell us what tools are you using for the presentation
MS office PowerPoint + Davinci Resolve (to composite) + Photoshop for images correction,
But Quality of presentation does not depend on tools. It actually all depends on intention. It should match and support what you want to deliver 👍
Thank you bro!it helps me a lot
Thank you for this information
You welcome ☺️
3:24 your picture of BSPP shows a tapered thread. And again at the right hand side of 7:52. Just checking that this wasn't intentional? Is there some taper in parallel threads to ease assembly?
Hey, I have clearly said it's a parallel thread. yes, the model is looks not completely parallel, but I have also used parallel lines to make you believe that its parallel.
Great 👍
Good going 👏
Thank you 😊
Very nice explanation
Very useful video ❤
I'm glad 😊
Thanks alot for clear explanation bro, also can u explain NPT-NPTF-NPSM. May be next video will be on this toppic, thanks again
Thank you so much brother. Yeah I'll make more videos on Hardwares.
Thank you Sir, good sharing.
Thanks a lot!
You're welcome!
very good Video, thank you very much. it help me a lot. Do you have video that explain on NPT thread? i always confuse on BSPT and NPT when buying parts and fittings. Many thanks
I'll make a video on it 😊
Thank you very much bro🎉❤
Welcome 😊
awesome..
Awesome content
hartfully thanks
😊😊 You welcome
Very good video. I have one question for clarity. If I have a Female 1/4 G thread and I have a 1/4 RT thread for pneumatic application is this ok to use?
Yes 100 precent. If you have a tapper male thread, you can use in both tapper and straight female thread. should work 🤞🏽
Can I use Female G (parallel) thread and Male taper thread?
Yes we can
Plz sir all type thread video upload
Okay noted!!
Since you are transferring gas or fluids inside the pipes, the internal diameter plays a huge role (flow/pressures, pressure loss/drop etc.), therefore "size of the thread" is the internal diameter (not exactly, but very close).
So it is NOT "just a number" for historically unknown reasons.
Metric connections are straight forward - it's literally size of the thread.
But in case of tubing/piping/hoses it depends on industry, applications (so nominal number can be external or internal diameter).
Hi, The nominal was originally based on the inner diameter (measured in inches) of a steel tube for which the thread was intended, but contemporary pipes tend to use thinner walls to save material, and thus have an inner diameter larger than this nominal size. But we still denote the size in inner diameter in inches, just because of history (Inner dia is equal to BSP Thread size, which is not relevant these days.) But yes i haven't explained this in video just to avoid confusion. (Always refer the standard table of thread) And i directly said it's a historical legacy
Just for wording clarity- Historical legacy doesn't mean- unknown reason. There was a reason (this is why they were using it) but not relevant today. But we are still using it just because of history.
❤❤❤❤❤
Bro R1 aned R2???
These are also R series thread made to match with Rs and Rp i guess
Very informative video. Please do a video on gear quality standards.
Sure 👍
Nice 🙂
Thank you 😊
That 1 inch is not a nominal value in bsp standard 1 inch value is 33.25 mm in metric standard it’s 25.4 mm it’s varies
As an American the reason we use NPT has to do with the whole milk before or after tea debate. We dont take our tea like that.....
"What? Well, how do Americans like their tea then?" I hear you wondering after that totally not obvious set up. The answer is....
...We like our tea...
🕶
SALTY!!!! 🦅😎 [eagleScreech-explosions-fireworks-barbeques-freedom-and-rockMusic.mp4]😁
😂😂
@@mastermechanicaldesign🤣 😉
BTW, cool video mate. Im queueing up your thrust bearing one now, and your bearing series seems relevant to a telescope mount rebuild/upgrade project Ive been fiddling with.
I dig the simple but not simplistic format. There is a HUGE vacuum of content between beginner/novice levels and knowledgeable craftsmen level that tends to leave people in a rut of knowing just enough to be dangerous but having nothing to learn the next level in planning design steps, reasonings on choices for a given part, or component selection, etc. All we usually get is 'just buy this one' never a 'okay, why not that cheaper one' or 'I dont have those, but I have these almost exactly the same ones' explanation. Case and point, the not using tapered threads and adding an O-ring on hydraulics (I mean, I know why, having worked in a machine shop for animatronics a long time ago (mainly in tool making, ie molding and casting, but also some electrical/mechatronics and the odd trip to the mills to make a linkage or two), you dont want a 3000psi pinhole leak.....literally anywhere, so seal it up good. Dont trust what looks okay, air (gases) is not fluid, fluid is not air, do it right. Those SOPs exist for a reason. But without going into that whole subject of pressurized fluid dangers the correct fittings were...) explained quickly and clearly. Looking forward to checking out your backlog of content. Keep on keeping on man!
😎👍
Thank you so much 🤗, i really appreciate that you give time to write such great feedback ☺️ and people like you really inspiring me to give myself 100% in content.
Knowledgeable, Thanks for sharing 👍
You welcome 😊