As Brit I have to say this is the most comprehensive and informative video I have seen on this subject. Most confusion arises form all the different naming conventions. It would appear we have more pipe thread compatibility internationally than it first appears. North America being the exception.
This video is best video i found on internet related to Hydro-pneumatic fitting. Because in every other video they describe about pitch,tpi,dia which are already available on internet in standard form, but don't tell about the basic difference. After going through this video no doubt will be left over in your mind. Great work 👍 i really liked it.
MS office PowerPoint + Davinci Resolve (to composite) + Photoshop for images correction, But Quality of presentation does not depend on tools. It actually all depends on intention. It should match and support what you want to deliver 👍
very good Video, thank you very much. it help me a lot. Do you have video that explain on NPT thread? i always confuse on BSPT and NPT when buying parts and fittings. Many thanks
3:24 your picture of BSPP shows a tapered thread. And again at the right hand side of 7:52. Just checking that this wasn't intentional? Is there some taper in parallel threads to ease assembly?
Hey, I have clearly said it's a parallel thread. yes, the model is looks not completely parallel, but I have also used parallel lines to make you believe that its parallel.
Since you are transferring gas or fluids inside the pipes, the internal diameter plays a huge role (flow/pressures, pressure loss/drop etc.), therefore "size of the thread" is the internal diameter (not exactly, but very close). So it is NOT "just a number" for historically unknown reasons. Metric connections are straight forward - it's literally size of the thread. But in case of tubing/piping/hoses it depends on industry, applications (so nominal number can be external or internal diameter).
Hi, The nominal was originally based on the inner diameter (measured in inches) of a steel tube for which the thread was intended, but contemporary pipes tend to use thinner walls to save material, and thus have an inner diameter larger than this nominal size. But we still denote the size in inner diameter in inches, just because of history (Inner dia is equal to BSP Thread size, which is not relevant these days.) But yes i haven't explained this in video just to avoid confusion. (Always refer the standard table of thread) And i directly said it's a historical legacy
Just for wording clarity- Historical legacy doesn't mean- unknown reason. There was a reason (this is why they were using it) but not relevant today. But we are still using it just because of history.
I agree it would have been more clear to explain it's (roughly) the inner diameter otherwise it seems like some kind of nonsensical sort of random number which makes it harder to store in your brain.
Very good video. I have one question for clarity. If I have a Female 1/4 G thread and I have a 1/4 RT thread for pneumatic application is this ok to use?
As an American the reason we use NPT has to do with the whole milk before or after tea debate. We dont take our tea like that..... "What? Well, how do Americans like their tea then?" I hear you wondering after that totally not obvious set up. The answer is.... ...We like our tea... 🕶 SALTY!!!! 🦅😎 [eagleScreech-explosions-fireworks-barbeques-freedom-and-rockMusic.mp4]😁
@@mastermechanicaldesign🤣 😉 BTW, cool video mate. Im queueing up your thrust bearing one now, and your bearing series seems relevant to a telescope mount rebuild/upgrade project Ive been fiddling with. I dig the simple but not simplistic format. There is a HUGE vacuum of content between beginner/novice levels and knowledgeable craftsmen level that tends to leave people in a rut of knowing just enough to be dangerous but having nothing to learn the next level in planning design steps, reasonings on choices for a given part, or component selection, etc. All we usually get is 'just buy this one' never a 'okay, why not that cheaper one' or 'I dont have those, but I have these almost exactly the same ones' explanation. Case and point, the not using tapered threads and adding an O-ring on hydraulics (I mean, I know why, having worked in a machine shop for animatronics a long time ago (mainly in tool making, ie molding and casting, but also some electrical/mechatronics and the odd trip to the mills to make a linkage or two), you dont want a 3000psi pinhole leak.....literally anywhere, so seal it up good. Dont trust what looks okay, air (gases) is not fluid, fluid is not air, do it right. Those SOPs exist for a reason. But without going into that whole subject of pressurized fluid dangers the correct fittings were...) explained quickly and clearly. Looking forward to checking out your backlog of content. Keep on keeping on man! 😎👍
Thank you so much 🤗, i really appreciate that you give time to write such great feedback ☺️ and people like you really inspiring me to give myself 100% in content.
As Brit I have to say this is the most comprehensive and informative video I have seen on this subject. Most confusion arises form all the different naming conventions. It would appear we have more pipe thread compatibility internationally than it first appears. North America being the exception.
As a "North American", I found out quite a lot from the video. Awesome, clear information
This video is best video i found on internet related to Hydro-pneumatic fitting. Because in every other video they describe about pitch,tpi,dia which are already available on internet in standard form, but don't tell about the basic difference. After going through this video no doubt will be left over in your mind. Great work 👍 i really liked it.
I'm so glad 😊
Thank you so much for your video ! It just saved me !!
Many thanks from France !!
You most welcome
Most useful content provided by you sir❤️ lage raho
Thank you so much 😊
Very enthusiastic knowledge. Keep it 💯
❤️❤️
Bro could you tell us what tools are you using for the presentation
MS office PowerPoint + Davinci Resolve (to composite) + Photoshop for images correction,
But Quality of presentation does not depend on tools. It actually all depends on intention. It should match and support what you want to deliver 👍
God bless you sir! You have explained it in very simple manner, ! sir can you make video on Welding methods and standards #welding
Thank you so much, Hashim, God bless you too !! Welding video- Noted!!
Thanks alot for clear explanation bro, also can u explain NPT-NPTF-NPSM. May be next video will be on this toppic, thanks again
Thank you so much brother. Yeah I'll make more videos on Hardwares.
very good Video, thank you very much. it help me a lot. Do you have video that explain on NPT thread? i always confuse on BSPT and NPT when buying parts and fittings. Many thanks
I'll make a video on it 😊
This is like hidden treasure opened 😊😊
😊
its very useful for me brother....thanks for the video...
You welcome 🤗
Nice video! It was way more detailed than I originally expected it to be, but it was really interesting.
Glad to hear it!
3:24 your picture of BSPP shows a tapered thread. And again at the right hand side of 7:52. Just checking that this wasn't intentional? Is there some taper in parallel threads to ease assembly?
Hey, I have clearly said it's a parallel thread. yes, the model is looks not completely parallel, but I have also used parallel lines to make you believe that its parallel.
Yes we need this types of more vidieo❤
Sure 😊
Awesome content nice video.....
Thank you so much Srinivasan
Since you are transferring gas or fluids inside the pipes, the internal diameter plays a huge role (flow/pressures, pressure loss/drop etc.), therefore "size of the thread" is the internal diameter (not exactly, but very close).
So it is NOT "just a number" for historically unknown reasons.
Metric connections are straight forward - it's literally size of the thread.
But in case of tubing/piping/hoses it depends on industry, applications (so nominal number can be external or internal diameter).
Hi, The nominal was originally based on the inner diameter (measured in inches) of a steel tube for which the thread was intended, but contemporary pipes tend to use thinner walls to save material, and thus have an inner diameter larger than this nominal size. But we still denote the size in inner diameter in inches, just because of history (Inner dia is equal to BSP Thread size, which is not relevant these days.) But yes i haven't explained this in video just to avoid confusion. (Always refer the standard table of thread) And i directly said it's a historical legacy
Just for wording clarity- Historical legacy doesn't mean- unknown reason. There was a reason (this is why they were using it) but not relevant today. But we are still using it just because of history.
I agree it would have been more clear to explain it's (roughly) the inner diameter otherwise it seems like some kind of nonsensical sort of random number which makes it harder to store in your brain.
Many thanks for your clear explanation
Good going 👏
Thank you 😊
thank you verymuch
You most welcome ❤️
Nice Video Explanation. Thank you for sharing.
I'm so glad 😊
Very good video. I have one question for clarity. If I have a Female 1/4 G thread and I have a 1/4 RT thread for pneumatic application is this ok to use?
Yes 100 precent. If you have a tapper male thread, you can use in both tapper and straight female thread. should work 🤞🏽
Thank yo so much for sharing your knowledge brother. This is priceless.
My pleasure! 😊
super explanation sir
thaanks for awesome video brother keep up the good work
Thank you 😊
Thank you bro!it helps me a lot
Wonder what the "c" stands for in Rc Female Tapered Thread
Very nice explanation
Plz sir all type thread video upload
Okay noted!!
Thank you for this information
You welcome ☺️
Can I use Female G (parallel) thread and Male taper thread?
Yes we can
Very useful video ❤
I'm glad 😊
Thank you Sir, good sharing.
Great 👍
Awesome content
Thank you very much bro🎉❤
Welcome 😊
Nice 🙂
Thank you 😊
Very informative video. Please do a video on gear quality standards.
Sure 👍
Thanks a lot!
You're welcome!
Knowledgeable, Thanks for sharing 👍
You welcome 😊
awesome..
Bro R1 aned R2???
These are also R series thread made to match with Rs and Rp i guess
❤❤❤❤❤
hartfully thanks
😊😊 You welcome
That 1 inch is not a nominal value in bsp standard 1 inch value is 33.25 mm in metric standard it’s 25.4 mm it’s varies
As an American the reason we use NPT has to do with the whole milk before or after tea debate. We dont take our tea like that.....
"What? Well, how do Americans like their tea then?" I hear you wondering after that totally not obvious set up. The answer is....
...We like our tea...
🕶
SALTY!!!! 🦅😎 [eagleScreech-explosions-fireworks-barbeques-freedom-and-rockMusic.mp4]😁
😂😂
@@mastermechanicaldesign🤣 😉
BTW, cool video mate. Im queueing up your thrust bearing one now, and your bearing series seems relevant to a telescope mount rebuild/upgrade project Ive been fiddling with.
I dig the simple but not simplistic format. There is a HUGE vacuum of content between beginner/novice levels and knowledgeable craftsmen level that tends to leave people in a rut of knowing just enough to be dangerous but having nothing to learn the next level in planning design steps, reasonings on choices for a given part, or component selection, etc. All we usually get is 'just buy this one' never a 'okay, why not that cheaper one' or 'I dont have those, but I have these almost exactly the same ones' explanation. Case and point, the not using tapered threads and adding an O-ring on hydraulics (I mean, I know why, having worked in a machine shop for animatronics a long time ago (mainly in tool making, ie molding and casting, but also some electrical/mechatronics and the odd trip to the mills to make a linkage or two), you dont want a 3000psi pinhole leak.....literally anywhere, so seal it up good. Dont trust what looks okay, air (gases) is not fluid, fluid is not air, do it right. Those SOPs exist for a reason. But without going into that whole subject of pressurized fluid dangers the correct fittings were...) explained quickly and clearly. Looking forward to checking out your backlog of content. Keep on keeping on man!
😎👍
Thank you so much 🤗, i really appreciate that you give time to write such great feedback ☺️ and people like you really inspiring me to give myself 100% in content.
Very useful.. thanks for the information...