"... it doesn't have hydro." Meanwhile, the hydro consumable merrily pings the water. edit: When you think about it, Jinges' excellent commentary is made all the more impressive when you realize he's not actually watching the replays as he's doing it. :)
And it's not like that was the only thing he got wrong here, not even close. This was one of the most inaccurate episodes in a long time, I counted 7 pieces of outright misinformation and 3 more that are a bit ambiguous :D Gotta love the commentaries, not sure if regardless of the mistakes or partly because of them.
You do know the reason Petro is a tech tree ship is so that WG can say "if the game is pay to win, why is the most ridiculously overpowered ship available for XP?"
@@Xiphactinus Having had a few classes in the field, it'd be a miserable, shitty ride but it's seaworthiness would be fine. It's roughly equivalent to the Scharnhorst class in both freeboard and IIRC tonnage, and those didn't really have any issues in those waters.
5:50 "Doesn't have hydro ... oh there's another weakness" . I guess when you press T you activate the short range underwater radar . Ah Jingles never change ^^
That moment when you realize all the comments about the hydro are helping the algorithm 😁 Keep it up Jingles! I don't know what I would do without you!
Your World of Warships content has really been helping me through a lot, not that you'll see this probably but its been rough. You constant WoW's has given me something to look forward to and trust me, its not going unnoticed. I'll get back to the salt mines now
Like uncle Claus Kellerman use to say, base condition to have great battle is presence of multiple muppets in both teams. Works in WOT and works in WOWS too.
Looking at this MM... I'm like: "It is almost as if regular cruisers were horribly balanced and not viable at all. Could it be that spreadsheet is bollocks?!"
Spreadsheet is bullocks? Of course, they should have used Tableau. I mean, who still uses spreadsheets when there are proper BI software available? Maybe that explains certain WG decisions.
I was pleasantly surprised when I came around a corner and saw a Slava sitting with flat broadside to me in my Kurrywurst. 70k dmg in one salvo, only 1 shell missed, in the first volley. Then I got about 50 sec hits and he went down. Total of 80k dmg dealt to 1 Rusky boi in less than half a minute. He was tanking everything our team could throw at him but I was patient and went around and flanked and slammed him right back into port where he belonged. This is basically the only weakness of Russian ships, especially BBs (not light cruisers, for some reason). Short range and flat broadside otherwise you'll just bounce on the sloped side plating.
It's the distance. Look at how close he is to those BBs and they're giving him the flattest of broadsides. I've done the same thing in the DM and the Myoko.
@@matthewvenci2430 even if petro sucks.. the damn thing can tank like 3 bbs, 2 cruisers..etc.. only real damage they take comes from the HE spammers like Thunderer, Colbert, Yoshino and Hindenburg.
Ok, now I need a Petro replay with a cricket score citadel count and a Premier League footballer's monthly salary worth of damage made, accompanied by Jingles happily cackling away! This was bloody brilliant! Marvelous, O'Lord of the Saltmines!
Meanwhile on board of the Hms. Thunderer: "There seems to be something wrong with my bloody ship today!" Jutland all over, only this time because WG's Pravda department wants to see pigs fly.
@@grandadmiralraeder9608 cruisers of Kirov class armed with 9 180mm were considered as non-treaty light cruisers after anglo-soviet naval agreement of 1937, signed right after the Second London Treaty of 1936, so technically A.Nevsky is still a light cruiser, just an informal one
Thank you Jingles for uploading this excellent video, starring the main reason I quit the game a few months back. I was just getting the urge to load up World of Warships again. You have saved me a whole lot of anguish by preventing that.
The Stalingrad: I seem to recall hearing somewhere that Wargaming doesn't have a Russian bias. I think this broke some of the gears in the crane that suspends my disbelief. :P
Actually, 15 inch guns can overmatch and citadel the Petro, just have to know where to shoot it, which is the upper nose. I did a drive by of a Petropavlosk in clan wars in my Montana and dev struck him by shooting through his upper nose
Jingles, you’re wrong! The Nevsky is a light cruiser! It just has more HP, more armor, better plating, better pen, better shell velocity, and higher fire chance than most heavies!
I know how this works. As soon as Jingles posts videos like this, making me want to get one whatever it takes, as soon as I either get close or a day or two after I get it, WG either removes it, puts it in a higher tier or two, or just takes a great big ol' nerf bat to it.
I feel like Admiral Salty would almost be a better nickname for Jingles at this point ^^ The glaring irony and sarcasm presented in the clips are TH-cam gold ^^
The sigma is 2.05 like a lot of other cruisers but with the unusual Soviet dispersion curve that is better than average below about 12km and worse above it. The Stalingrad gets 2.65 but the battle cruiser dispersion curve as well. Sigma affects both vertical and horizontal dispersion and is a measure of the standard deviation of a Gaussian distribution i.e. how likely the shots will fall in the centre of the dispersion ellipse.
@@nvducei true, vertical dispersion can be improved by extending range. I'm not sure I'd take it on the petro but it's definitely a good option on American BBs that can't mount the normal -7% dispersion mod in slot 3.
I still don't understand why they made it so bigger sigma values equals to smaller dispersion. So sigma in wows isn't the actual sigma value in the Gaussian distribution but more like inverse standard deviation.
@@dashadower Either the calculus I learned is different from that you learned or I've gotten so old that things have changed but it is my understanding the larger the standard deviation is the higher the dispersion whereas the smaller it is the tighter, closer to the center it is.
@@edmartin875 Yes you are correct. It's wows thats different, because we want smaller dispersion for more "accurate" fire which means higher sigma ingame
One of the rare videos I stopped playing... I was already ready to bail when I see Petro, and when Shiki aims and gets 2k damage from 20" shells, well that is why you shouldn't bother with Petro replays. Everything about this ship is Russian Training Wheels...
It's kinda strange that I uninstalled WS not long after I got my hands on the Petro. And laughed at the fact that Yamato's couldn't pen me from the front if they were a little farther away.... It was WoT all over again....so I guess I'm done with WG completely. First tried Warplanes, then quit, then wasted 5+ years on WoT (and a lot of money) and then 3 years on WoWs....I just wish I could turn back time.
Slap Kutznezov on as the commander, and he would have gotten an extra heal and dammacon to probably win against the Nevsky and Småland. Yea. This ship can actually be even better than in this game!😅
3 cruisers, 4 destroyers and 5 targets per team- 2021 WG matchmaker. What are the battleships going to do exactly? Chase down citadel the destroyers? Burn down and maybe torp the cruisers?
If I were to be in balance department I know how to balance petro. She takes 200% increased damage from flooding as her freeboard is so low on the water she already looks like a ship thats about to sink. And if a shell calliber bigger than 305mm manages to score 6 hits on the same part of the ship as overpens she gets a flooding. Higher the shell caliber less shells needed to make her flood. Floodings caused by main battery overpens only last for 10 second but maintain the increased flooding damage
@@rampagesniper2588 no i meant implementing theese balance changes would be easier than making a new class of ships for example like subs. instead of making subs they could have made theese balance changes to all the ships in the game.
@@Froststrike IIRC this game HAD that mechanic somewhere in it's prehistory (alpha or beta stages), where, if you scored a damaging/penetrating hit below the waterline, the ship would get flooding. The early version of flooding also was REALLY bad, as it lasted longer than fires and did a lot more damage. It also may have slowed your ship down, unless I remember incorrectly. Basically, you either DC'd the flood or you were dead. Unsurprisingly they did away with that feature, even though floods made it into the game as the really dangerous version, but you only could get them with torps. They were then toned town eventually, to the lame version we now have.
just started really watching your channel a lot....your funny as hell....and have a wonderful channel..informative, fun, and you can learn a lot. Well done.
"How did he hit the rear turret?" You know how sometimes Stalin reaches up from the depths of Hell to guide your shells to the target? I guess sometimes he reaches up to redirect an enemy shell as well...
Oh snap 45 seconds from release? Thx for the videos every night before I sleep jingles. I know it’s morning for you but it’s 11pm in Hawaii when you release
there was a time when this game would have mostly cruisers in the mmr. the destroyer and bb captains would just fill the rest up with 1 cv that could burn for ages if it showed itself. there were no subs, no superships and the yammi was the biggest boi in the game. good times
xD, I was one of the guys that posted in that petro subbreddit post. My comment was "Due to reduced radar making it more difficult to deal with destroyers we are slightly buffing HE damage by 50%" xD
For everyone mentioning the Hydro situation, I think Jingles maybe meant that you can't have it along with the DFAA and Radar (it's one of those selectbale things where the DFAA and Hydro share the same slot). That being said, I don't even know if there are any ships in the game where all 3 consumables have separate slots...
Anybody who has ever got to use the Petro will understand why you will at some point call it "Big daddy Petro". It's literally such a good ship that it makes no sense and perfect sense why it's a tech tree ship. It's wg excuse to say they have a ship you can grind for that's literally better than everything else, even some battleships. Jingle makes a point about average reload, meanwhile italian cruisers have much longer reload with smaller guns and much less pen. Imagine a cruiser that can cit battleships with 13 second reloads, and also be tanky as shit.
wait a Thunderer that has switched to HE from AP? I think that it is rarer to see the opposite happen but then that might be more a problem on the Asia Server.
I love Jingles complaining about the lack of weaknesses in the ship while the footage is showing one of the weaknesses in action. The Petro can't shoot over a sandbar, let alone a real island. That's the trade off for the high shell velocity and flat arcs.
7:28 - now that's not the first time in a Jingles video that I've seen a ship with nine guns pull the trigger and score nine citadels (on a Japanese battleship, no less), but if I had a nickel for every time I'd seen that happen... well I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice.
Good lordy, I thought the Giulio Cesare was over powered at tier 5, I'm a casual player and this is so so broken. I think I have to ask, World of Warships, why does this exist???? Plus, 30 citadels??!!! I think the most I got in the Graf Spee was 10, and I thought that was a lot. Yeah that battle actually happened, I think this made my morning.
Petro can do a lot of things that any other ship in the game cannot do, or if they can, can only do one or a few of: a. radar b. harder to kill than most battleships and/or an uparmoured cockroach (see armour scheme, physical size, etc.) c. improved pen angles d. among the highest penetration at any range, and even higher than some super cruisers. e. the shortest shell flight time in the game at almost every range. (due to her very fast muzzle velocity, high shell weight, and the lowest drag value in the game) f. among the best cruiser AA in the game (long range, lots of flak, high continuous, access to defAA.) g. access to kuznetsov, the most broken special comander ever made, making her even harder to kill. h. fast speed i. ESPECIALLY for how dangerous she is, excellent concealment. I mean until very recently she even has stealth radar, even though weegee nerfed woosters radar range 'to eliminate that from the game' j. 360 turrets for NO REASON give her much more flexibility and higher practical time on target. k. did I mention that she has spaced armour too, just in case you actually managed to hit her 'shorter than most destroyers' freeboard? l. incredible accuracy, especially within 15km. m. improved secondary accuracy, because why not. n. very high healthpool, despite having best in class armour and size. and believe it or not, I could go on. The petro has EVERY advantage you could possibly give a cruiser, sans torpedos and a slightly bigger than average turning circle. I'm sorry if you have the petro and it makes you feel good to play it, but the ship is a crutch, and this makes it INARGUABLY overpowered, and I'm really tired of people trying to act like it isn't.
At after, I thought the Petro was a battleship. No joke. I didn't otherwise hear jingles mention that the Petro was a cruiser, until a little before it was killing the thunderer arse. My God, how a cruiser kills 18 inch gun battleships, is just scary. And it's a tier tree ship?!
You'll have to forgive the crude nickname my clan and I gave that ship back when I played the game, but calling that thing the "Petroprolapse" is probably a far more accurate and telling of the experience you're going to have fighting it.
Due to high likelihood of the Petro to miss while aiming at the citadel of ships, we have increased the sigma rating to 11.6. With this increase in accuracy, we will be reducing the maximum damage of the guns by 170 points for AP and 200 points for HE to insure proper balance. We will also be adding orbital guidance for the ship when firing at submarines, increasing the chance to hit and cause damage by 248%
"A ship with radar is weak because it doesn't have hydro," Jingles says while the ship is running hydro. Oh never change, your lordship.
Like, this has to be 100% on purpose right?
He is totally doing it on purpose.
@@Kloran27 Oh? You must be new here, welcome to the salt mines where double shifts are the stantard and our glorious gnome overlord is a bit crap :D
He goes to talk about reddit comedians so it's defo on purpose
"... it doesn't have hydro."
Meanwhile, the hydro consumable merrily pings the water.
edit: When you think about it, Jinges' excellent commentary is made all the more impressive when you realize he's not actually watching the replays as he's doing it. :)
I felt that hydro commentary was pure outright sarcasm as the hydro was running and highlighting that yes... this thing even has hydro on top of that.
Enough talk, off to the salt mines with you!
And it's not like that was the only thing he got wrong here, not even close. This was one of the most inaccurate episodes in a long time, I counted 7 pieces of outright misinformation and 3 more that are a bit ambiguous :D
Gotta love the commentaries, not sure if regardless of the mistakes or partly because of them.
He probably has got Akazuki next to him telling what's happening on screen.
@@wombat4191 for real? what did I miss? (quite a lot I guess since I wasn't paying attention that much...)
"To be fair, dirty hairy has taken a shit-ton of damage"
To be fair, Jingles, almost any other cruiser would have been dead minutes ago.
Jingles roasting WG puts a smile on my face after a long day at work.
fellow bassist. ooooooo
You do know the reason Petro is a tech tree ship is so that WG can say "if the game is pay to win, why is the most ridiculously overpowered ship available for XP?"
I also love how ridiculously small the freeboard is, it wouldn't survive five seconds in the atlantic!
@@Xiphactinus It'll be fine, Russian ships (and tanks) don't obey the same laws of physics as the rest of the universe.
@@Xiphactinus Having had a few classes in the field, it'd be a miserable, shitty ride but it's seaworthiness would be fine. It's roughly equivalent to the Scharnhorst class in both freeboard and IIRC tonnage, and those didn't really have any issues in those waters.
@@glitchrr36 thanks for the correction!
@@Xiphactinus no problem!
5:50 "Doesn't have hydro ... oh there's another weakness" . I guess when you press T you activate the short range underwater radar . Ah Jingles never change ^^
You are just holding whichever crewmate most offended the captain in the last week upside down into the water.
@@aquila4460 Ah, a good ol' keel hauling, always brings the chaps back in line
@@aquila4460 I love this comment
"To be fair-"
*scores 10 citadels and a kill in 2 salvos*
"...yes."
That moment when you realize all the comments about the hydro are helping the algorithm 😁
Keep it up Jingles! I don't know what I would do without you!
Obviously Jingles only makes those "mistakes" to encourage us to feed the algorythm. That's been his master plan from the beginning
@@LucyKaida It's an amazing plan to be honest. Our lord is a genius ❤️
Your World of Warships content has really been helping me through a lot, not that you'll see this probably but its been rough. You constant WoW's has given me something to look forward to and trust me, its not going unnoticed. I'll get back to the salt mines now
keep that chin up soldier
@@DarthPeachy and that pickaxe swinging ofc🤣
There is nothing like a Jingles video to make one smile :)
Doesn't have hydro? Jingles, he was using the hydro as you said that lol
who else but Jingles?
@@SirCottonman Exactly. I wouldn't have it any other way.
Like uncle Claus Kellerman use to say, base condition to have great battle is presence of multiple muppets in both teams.
Works in WOT and works in WOWS too.
Looking at this MM... I'm like:
"It is almost as if regular cruisers were horribly balanced and not viable at all. Could it be that spreadsheet is bollocks?!"
*Wargaming* - Did you not watch the video we released not long ago? The game is perfectly balanced!
Playerbase - Did you not realize that we think you lot at WarGaming are a bunch of liars?
Smart players "LOL this is great to watch now that I've uninstalled their malware"
Spreadsheet is bullocks? Of course, they should have used Tableau. I mean, who still uses spreadsheets when there are proper BI software available? Maybe that explains certain WG decisions.
@@dclark142002, drunk on vodka, more like it!
I've had AP slam into a broadside of a Battleship as a battleship and get almost nothing but he's getting citadels in a cruiser. WTAF?
Its the Petro.
Just accept the suck.
9. Nine citadels in a single broadside. I think he only fired 9 guns in that too.
@@amontpetit He only HAS 9 guns. Every shot fired in that salvo was a citadel.
I was pleasantly surprised when I came around a corner and saw a Slava sitting with flat broadside to me in my Kurrywurst. 70k dmg in one salvo, only 1 shell missed, in the first volley. Then I got about 50 sec hits and he went down. Total of 80k dmg dealt to 1 Rusky boi in less than half a minute. He was tanking everything our team could throw at him but I was patient and went around and flanked and slammed him right back into port where he belonged. This is basically the only weakness of Russian ships, especially BBs (not light cruisers, for some reason). Short range and flat broadside otherwise you'll just bounce on the sloped side plating.
It's the distance. Look at how close he is to those BBs and they're giving him the flattest of broadsides. I've done the same thing in the DM and the Myoko.
WG: "There is no Russian Bias..."
*PETROPAVLOVSK*
Petro is old news.. true russian bias is that POS Nakhinov CV.
Can't wait to see how BS the russian premium subs will be.
petro sucks in randoms, it has anemic dpm
@@CesarinPillinGaming It's just gonna be Typhoons with MIRVs.
@@jessecarozza8134 one ping only, please, Vasili
@@matthewvenci2430 even if petro sucks.. the damn thing can tank like 3 bbs, 2 cruisers..etc.. only real damage they take comes from the HE spammers like Thunderer, Colbert, Yoshino and Hindenburg.
Ok, now I need a Petro replay with a cricket score citadel count and a Premier League footballer's monthly salary worth of damage made, accompanied by Jingles happily cackling away!
This was bloody brilliant!
Marvelous, O'Lord of the Saltmines!
Meanwhile on board of the Hms. Thunderer: "There seems to be something wrong with my bloody ship today!" Jutland all over, only this time because WG's Pravda department wants to see pigs fly.
1 minute in and already the first jingles moment.
"Not a single light cruiser"
*blankly stares at Nevsky on the enemy team*
Nevsky has 180mm guns it is a heavy cruiser (light cruisers have guns up to 155mm calibre)
@@grandadmiralraeder9608 cruisers of Kirov class armed with 9 180mm were considered as non-treaty light cruisers after anglo-soviet naval agreement of 1937, signed right after the Second London Treaty of 1936, so technically A.Nevsky is still a light cruiser, just an informal one
Thank you Jingles for uploading this excellent video, starring the main reason I quit the game a few months back. I was just getting the urge to load up World of Warships again. You have saved me a whole lot of anguish by preventing that.
The Stalingrad: I seem to recall hearing somewhere that Wargaming doesn't have a Russian bias. I think this broke some of the gears in the crane that suspends my disbelief. :P
Every online game coming out of Russia that I am familiar with has Russian bias.
When over a quarter of your shots are citadels.... feels good man!
"Doesn't have hydro"
Me: *looks at video. Hydro currently active. Can hear the sound effects*
Petro gets everything. It's pretty retarded.
@@raideurng2508 that's not the point, bro
Its clever he gets tons of comments correcting him that helps with the youtube algorithm and promoting the video more
NOoooo i aint hydro it only has radar according to the salt admiral what u saw is JuSt short Range unDeRwaTer radar lmao
Finally a new video to watch, I was scouring through his old videos trying to find something to watch lol
The sheer memery Petro is able to get away with is awe-inspiring.
Like citadelling Kremlins. 15 times.
Shikashima: A literal super Yamato with absolutely insane guns. *Can't do shit against Petro at point blank range.
Actually, 15 inch guns can overmatch and citadel the Petro, just have to know where to shoot it, which is the upper nose. I did a drive by of a Petropavlosk in clan wars in my Montana and dev struck him by shooting through his upper nose
Icebreaker bows. Do they make a lick of sense? No. Do WG care? No.
I mean, if you're the type of idiot who broadsides a close range heavy cruiser, then you probably can't do much at all.
"Petro is kind of strong ship" More like kind of BS ship.
RUSSIAN OP, WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT.
BLYATSYKA SHIP NOW GULAG
Jingles, you’re wrong! The Nevsky is a light cruiser! It just has more HP, more armor, better plating, better pen, better shell velocity, and higher fire chance than most heavies!
I know how this works. As soon as Jingles posts videos like this, making me want to get one whatever it takes, as soon as I either get close or a day or two after I get it, WG either removes it, puts it in a higher tier or two, or just takes a great big ol' nerf bat to it.
"A Petro is not allowed to be sunk, so now we have doubled its HP pool and now it has 3000mm of armor from every angle."
As we all know, Soviet Navy was the best navy of WW2 an beyond - blessed with the power of Stalins iron fist.
Ship is just historically correct. XD
Soviet Navy, Soviet Armor Technology and Airplanes of course...
I feel like Admiral Salty would almost be a better nickname for Jingles at this point ^^ The glaring irony and sarcasm presented in the clips are TH-cam gold ^^
The sigma is 2.05 like a lot of other cruisers but with the unusual Soviet dispersion curve that is better than average below about 12km and worse above it. The Stalingrad gets 2.65 but the battle cruiser dispersion curve as well.
Sigma affects both vertical and horizontal dispersion and is a measure of the standard deviation of a Gaussian distribution i.e. how likely the shots will fall in the centre of the dispersion ellipse.
Also note that this guy takes range mod here. And there's a "feature" that makes range mods improve your vertical dispersion as well
@@nvducei true, vertical dispersion can be improved by extending range. I'm not sure I'd take it on the petro but it's definitely a good option on American BBs that can't mount the normal -7% dispersion mod in slot 3.
I still don't understand why they made it so bigger sigma values equals to smaller dispersion. So sigma in wows isn't the actual sigma value in the Gaussian distribution but more like inverse standard deviation.
@@dashadower Either the calculus I learned is different from that you learned or I've gotten so old that things have changed but it is my understanding the larger the standard deviation is the higher the dispersion whereas the smaller it is the tighter, closer to the center it is.
@@edmartin875 Yes you are correct. It's wows thats different, because we want smaller dispersion for more "accurate" fire which means higher sigma ingame
A wise man once said, "thundererers are ass cancer", So he went full proctologist on that thunderer
One of the rare videos I stopped playing... I was already ready to bail when I see Petro, and when Shiki aims and gets 2k damage from 20" shells, well that is why you shouldn't bother with Petro replays. Everything about this ship is Russian Training Wheels...
It's kinda strange that I uninstalled WS not long after I got my hands on the Petro.
And laughed at the fact that Yamato's couldn't pen me from the front if they were a little farther away....
It was WoT all over again....so I guess I'm done with WG completely. First tried Warplanes, then quit, then wasted 5+ years on WoT (and a lot of money) and then 3 years on WoWs....I just wish I could turn back time.
Slap Kutznezov on as the commander, and he would have gotten an extra heal and dammacon to probably win against the Nevsky and Småland. Yea. This ship can actually be even better than in this game!😅
I was waiting for the fireworks, haha.
I like how the man just lied about his DMG at the end lol.
Ah, I just see the WG response to that. "How can this ship possibly be overpowered? It sank, didn't it?"
Ships like these that make me realize I made the right decision when I quit playing this game.
3 cruisers, 4 destroyers and 5 targets per team- 2021 WG matchmaker.
What are the battleships going to do exactly? Chase down citadel the destroyers? Burn down and maybe torp the cruisers?
Can i just say i love hearing Akatsuki demanding your attention
If I were to be in balance department I know how to balance petro. She takes 200% increased damage from flooding as her freeboard is so low on the water she already looks like a ship thats about to sink. And if a shell calliber bigger than 305mm manages to score 6 hits on the same part of the ship as overpens she gets a flooding. Higher the shell caliber less shells needed to make her flood. Floodings caused by main battery overpens only last for 10 second but maintain the increased flooding damage
That is A LOT easier said than done fwi.
@@Froststrike still less effort than making an entire ship class.
@@mehmetsahsert3284 what would that class even be called they don't want battlecruisers, supercruisers aren't a class. Starships?
@@rampagesniper2588 no i meant implementing theese balance changes would be easier than making a new class of ships for example like subs.
instead of making subs they could have made theese balance changes to all the ships in the game.
@@Froststrike IIRC this game HAD that mechanic somewhere in it's prehistory (alpha or beta stages), where, if you scored a damaging/penetrating hit below the waterline, the ship would get flooding. The early version of flooding also was REALLY bad, as it lasted longer than fires and did a lot more damage. It also may have slowed your ship down, unless I remember incorrectly. Basically, you either DC'd the flood or you were dead. Unsurprisingly they did away with that feature, even though floods made it into the game as the really dangerous version, but you only could get them with torps. They were then toned town eventually, to the lame version we now have.
At 7:33 the player scored 9 citadels and served the battleship a paddling that would get child protective services called...
this video was hilarious. thx jingles, one of your funniest videos 2021.
My jaw dropped when I saw those...NINE citadels. Holy crap.
literally right as i go searching for a WoW vid to watch, jingles slaps another one out there
just started really watching your channel a lot....your funny as hell....and have a wonderful channel..informative, fun, and you can learn a lot. Well done.
"How did he hit the rear turret?"
You know how sometimes Stalin reaches up from the depths of Hell to guide your shells to the target? I guess sometimes he reaches up to redirect an enemy shell as well...
I absolutely adore the commentary from akizuki. You should offer her a full time position!
Oh snap 45 seconds from release? Thx for the videos every night before I sleep jingles. I know it’s morning for you but it’s 11pm in Hawaii when you release
Ditto but australia (8pm)
I'm having a very bad day today, but uncle Jingles to the rescue, with a video that will occupy my mind for 17:52 . Thank you.
this is why we love you m8 pls keep them coming
Another great video! Thank you sir
"Not a single light Cruiser, only Heavy Cruiser and Supercruiser". Al Nevsky: "Actually Jingles, i`m listed as a light Cruiser..."
Elbing was there too! Lol
My point exactly. And that gets paired off against a Yoshino?...Wargaming matchmaking. Go home. You're drunk.
Petropavlovsk - A Russian Heavy Cruiser that was never made but that was given epic performance by Russian game designers.
And let’s not forget, THE GEARING, has a higher freeboard than a petro
Uff I felt that 9 citadels even here in Switzerland.
Great job as always Brother Jimgles. Thanks Mate! :)
WG logic: shells that are flat from 3.5 km somehow take out the back turret
there was a time when this game would have mostly cruisers in the mmr. the destroyer and bb captains would just fill the rest up with 1 cv that could burn for ages if it showed itself. there were no subs, no superships and the yammi was the biggest boi in the game.
good times
Great video Jingles! As per usual. Ridiculous to see what the Petro can do in a good situation!
I love how the guy laughs at his own jokes...
The Petro basically sums up WG's balance philosophy: Russia Uber Alles.
xD, I was one of the guys that posted in that petro subbreddit post. My comment was "Due to reduced radar making it more difficult to deal with destroyers we are slightly buffing HE damage by 50%" xD
"...yup, its an older title, but it checks out."
Good to hear that gnarly laughter again Jingles
P.S. You ROCK Jingles, Sir!
That was a Citadel for every 5.1 main gun hits
For everyone mentioning the Hydro situation, I think Jingles maybe meant that you can't have it along with the DFAA and Radar (it's one of those selectbale things where the DFAA and Hydro share the same slot).
That being said, I don't even know if there are any ships in the game where all 3 consumables have separate slots...
Looking at you Worchester 😉
@@TheKobiDror Seattle and Cleveland too I believe. Austin I believe has the same gimmick iirc
Anybody who has ever got to use the Petro will understand why you will at some point call it "Big daddy Petro".
It's literally such a good ship that it makes no sense and perfect sense why it's a tech tree ship. It's wg excuse to say they have a ship you can grind for that's literally better than everything else, even some battleships.
Jingle makes a point about average reload, meanwhile italian cruisers have much longer reload with smaller guns and much less pen. Imagine a cruiser that can cit battleships with 13 second reloads, and also be tanky as shit.
wait a Thunderer that has switched to HE from AP? I think that it is rarer to see the opposite happen but then that might be more a problem on the Asia Server.
This game is the only place where the Russian Navy could be successful
I have to say, Jingles makes would make one hell of a good russian badguy in any given film!
Another example of the exceedingly high standards of gameplay on the EU server.
I love Jingles complaining about the lack of weaknesses in the ship while the footage is showing one of the weaknesses in action. The Petro can't shoot over a sandbar, let alone a real island. That's the trade off for the high shell velocity and flat arcs.
No, comrad, is no russian bias in game!
7:28 - now that's not the first time in a Jingles video that I've seen a ship with nine guns pull the trigger and score nine citadels (on a Japanese battleship, no less), but if I had a nickel for every time I'd seen that happen... well I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice.
If he was in a battleship those hits on the Shikishima would have both simultaneously over penned and ricocheted/shattered/hit torpedo protection.
IT HAS HYDRO, its right there, and making Hydro Noise... never change Jingles
9 citadel hits in a single salvo... Battleship mains absolutely salivating at that one
I must admit i was always under the impression that the Petro was a Premium ship. That blows my mind
That Monty and shiki would make the Dalai llama explode in frustration if he had the misfortune of teaming up with them.
Good lordy, I thought the Giulio Cesare was over powered at tier 5, I'm a casual player and this is so so broken. I think I have to ask, World of Warships, why does this exist???? Plus, 30 citadels??!!! I think the most I got in the Graf Spee was 10, and I thought that was a lot. Yeah that battle actually happened, I think this made my morning.
Petro can do a lot of things that any other ship in the game cannot do, or if they can, can only do one or a few of:
a. radar
b. harder to kill than most battleships and/or an uparmoured cockroach (see armour scheme, physical size, etc.)
c. improved pen angles
d. among the highest penetration at any range, and even higher than some super cruisers.
e. the shortest shell flight time in the game at almost every range. (due to her very fast muzzle velocity, high shell weight, and the lowest drag value in the game)
f. among the best cruiser AA in the game (long range, lots of flak, high continuous, access to defAA.)
g. access to kuznetsov, the most broken special comander ever made, making her even harder to kill.
h. fast speed
i. ESPECIALLY for how dangerous she is, excellent concealment. I mean until very recently she even has stealth radar, even though weegee nerfed woosters radar range 'to eliminate that from the game'
j. 360 turrets for NO REASON give her much more flexibility and higher practical time on target.
k. did I mention that she has spaced armour too, just in case you actually managed to hit her 'shorter than most destroyers' freeboard?
l. incredible accuracy, especially within 15km.
m. improved secondary accuracy, because why not.
n. very high healthpool, despite having best in class armour and size.
and believe it or not, I could go on. The petro has EVERY advantage you could possibly give a cruiser, sans torpedos and a slightly bigger than average turning circle.
I'm sorry if you have the petro and it makes you feel good to play it, but the ship is a crutch, and this makes it INARGUABLY overpowered, and I'm really tired of people trying to act like it isn't.
I can only hope the Petro is still like that when I get big enough to get one for my Xbox.
I have already had two 280k damage games this week alone that my team managed to lose. Yes I know the feeling
Warms my heart seeing " balans" working as intended 🤩
Love to hear your ironic laughing Jingles. Don’t play games but enjoy your commentary.
Btw, Zao is in the same tier.
Nah comrade, spreadsheet say Zao is fine.
At after, I thought the Petro was a battleship. No joke. I didn't otherwise hear jingles mention that the Petro was a cruiser, until a little before it was killing the thunderer arse.
My God, how a cruiser kills 18 inch gun battleships, is just scary. And it's a tier tree ship?!
You'll have to forgive the crude nickname my clan and I gave that ship back when I played the game, but calling that thing the "Petroprolapse" is probably a far more accurate and telling of the experience you're going to have fighting it.
6:06 quote Jingles: "It doesn't have hydro" Hydro is LITERALLY running at the same moment on screen... :P
can please someone provide a link to the reddit thread about the petro? i can't find it for some reason
Good Lord that 60k salvo on the Shikishima....Balans comrade indeed!
That Shikishima...probably crapped his pants after that 57k citadel hit because damn I sure as hell cringed.
One of the first to comment, yay. Have a good day, everybody. :)
Hope you have a nice one. Mine has not ended yet. Yay PST
Not a great start but the video makes it better
Morning. Starting the day with a little Jingles :)
Thanks Jingles.
Oh Jingles. Praising the accuracy of Petro while that is considered literally the only true downside of the boat.
I think this is where “A Game of Throws” was born
As a player, my target priority goes like this: 1:Russian cruisers. 2: everything else.
Due to high likelihood of the Petro to miss while aiming at the citadel of ships, we have increased the sigma rating to 11.6. With this increase in accuracy, we will be reducing the maximum damage of the guns by 170 points for AP and 200 points for HE to insure proper balance. We will also be adding orbital guidance for the ship when firing at submarines, increasing the chance to hit and cause damage by 248%