Tap to unmute

Russian KV-1 Tanks vs German Panzers - Tankers Clip HD - WWII Action Movie

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 11K

  • @northofmain
    @northofmain  4 ปีที่แล้ว +696

    Watch the full film "Tankers" on iTunes: itunes.apple.com/us/movie/tankers/id1481856493?ls=1 and Google Play play.google.com/store/movies/details/Tankers?id=qr8ysrCQdYg.P

    • @EdwardPCampbell
      @EdwardPCampbell 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      North of Main Better, and free of charge, to simply access the TH-cam posting, here: th-cam.com/video/LHJMapNHXAI/w-d-xo.html

    • @ihatecabbage7270
      @ihatecabbage7270 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      tank you very much

    • @EdwardPCampbell
      @EdwardPCampbell 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I HATE CABBAGE Don’t munch on it ☺️

    • @warpig6459
      @warpig6459 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dude, why didn't you make it for South Africa? I can't watch it cuz you didn't allow it to my country. 😞

    • @warpig6459
      @warpig6459 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I can't watch the movie cuz you didn't allow it for it to be watched by people in SA

  • @n-doghansenmand5655
    @n-doghansenmand5655 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10332

    There are more space in that tank than a normal apartment

    • @addimartin2098
      @addimartin2098 4 ปีที่แล้ว +280

      exactly what im thinking
      I SEARCHED FOR THAT COMMENT

    • @milancurda8753
      @milancurda8753 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Trapný

    • @ghostcz4023
      @ghostcz4023 4 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      @@milancurda8753 není, je to pravda... Ty tanky nemají tolik místa

    • @АрманШарипов-о7у
      @АрманШарипов-о7у 4 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Tank KV-1! Super!

    • @nogod7184
      @nogod7184 4 ปีที่แล้ว +214

      They could put a table inside and then sit around playing cards.

  • @krassilverfang5504
    @krassilverfang5504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4728

    "Fury is the most biased tank movie"
    Russians: Hold my Radio

    • @milckshakebeans8356
      @milckshakebeans8356 3 ปีที่แล้ว +120

      prefer a movie biased to the russians rather than to the germans to be fair :D

    • @crusader465
      @crusader465 3 ปีที่แล้ว +127

      @@milckshakebeans8356 id watch a german one rather than russian

    • @johnnyjohnson7022
      @johnnyjohnson7022 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      @@milckshakebeans8356 they were both mass-murderin war machine governments, just different flavors

    • @milckshakebeans8356
      @milckshakebeans8356 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@johnnyjohnson7022 you are right but i just wrote my comment as a joke.
      And if u compare by the ideology, than the nazi one is much more cancerus than the comminist ideology. Comparing stalin and hitler is a differnt topic, but we can agree both were extremely evil.

    • @CameronCraik
      @CameronCraik 3 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      what radio? teh soviet tanks lacked radios..

  • @bonkedwoofy4240
    @bonkedwoofy4240 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4619

    Well if German tanks were like that WW2 would have ended in 1940

    • @pxatm
      @pxatm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +429

      I mean this is pretty much how it went when German tanks met KV's and T-34's in 1941. They got completely rolled over when ever they had actual meeting engagements, with panzers being unable to penetrate Russian armor from as little as 10 meters away in some cases.

    • @bonkedwoofy4240
      @bonkedwoofy4240 4 ปีที่แล้ว +502

      @@pxatm Yeah but German tanker knew how to aim at least...

    • @panzerofthelake506
      @panzerofthelake506 4 ปีที่แล้ว +402

      @@bonkedwoofy4240 and not just drive towards the enemy like a Headless Chicken.

    • @pxatm
      @pxatm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +188

      @Ok Ok the 76mm gun on the T-34 was more powerful than anything mounted on German armor at the start of Barbarossa, the Panzer III would remain the most common tank in German service for the entire war. German armor on a technical level never outperformed its competition, exceptional gains were made by the German armor corps through strategic level decisions and widespread adoption of radio, but from the first weeks in France to the last days in Germany, German tanks faced better guns, armor and engines everywhere they looked.

    • @pxatm
      @pxatm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      @@nwomaimun821 don't need to read past your first line to know that you're a nazi and here to bad faith argue. German tanks were garbage, you get your tank knowledge from Mein Kampf?
      Don't reply, I know your type is willing to lie since this is directly attached to your world view so no evidence would actually be worth saying.

  • @jellin3607
    @jellin3607 ปีที่แล้ว +507

    I love how a KV 1 casually takes a shot from a PZ IV H, while also missing 90% of their shots, and then the T 34-85 shooting while driving, without a stabilizer.

    • @АнтонПанкратов-ь4г
      @АнтонПанкратов-ь4г ปีที่แล้ว +33

      It's like in fury with Bratt pitt😂

    • @SourrainTri
      @SourrainTri 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      T-34 85 was Help The KV-1

    • @NoOnesLikeMe
      @NoOnesLikeMe 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@АнтонПанкратов-ь4г Nah, this is even worst.

    • @suhzewkie
      @suhzewkie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@АнтонПанкратов-ь4гFury has a stabilizer, Tiger killed 3 tanks

    • @Dino-si2zk
      @Dino-si2zk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@suhzewkie The tiger wouldve destroyed every tank if it wasnt plot armor

  • @panzermeyer9944
    @panzermeyer9944 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4324

    3 wehrmacht shooting 1 russian & almost miss everytime. I think their server is lag.

    • @if131
      @if131 4 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      Rng

    • @vonRubentroph
      @vonRubentroph 4 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      No i think they are hacker but the hacker 5 years old

    • @felixb840
      @felixb840 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      It's from the Russians Germany was way much better..

    • @Martin-jc8kk
      @Martin-jc8kk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      @@felixb840 they wouldn't have shot on the move

    • @thegeneral565
      @thegeneral565 4 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      Maybe a russian film 👎🏼

  • @arminius6506
    @arminius6506 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1129

    Exterior : KV-1
    Interior : Battleship Yamato
    Armour : Plot armour

    • @daubeny7386
      @daubeny7386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      KV-1's Gun = Death Star

    • @washyourhands2359
      @washyourhands2359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Recoil:off

    • @darthsidious6167
      @darthsidious6167 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@daubeny7386 I think not

    • @daubeny7386
      @daubeny7386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@darthsidious6167 oh... HELLO THERE Emperor Palpatine i reallllllllly dont know of any death star and i LOVE the Empire and i even want to be a Stormtrooper.....ok ?

    • @ИммануилБормотухин
      @ИммануилБормотухин 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@washyourhands2359 What are you talking about? Proton cannon has no recoil.

  • @rvanhees89
    @rvanhees89 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2830

    Those KV-1 tanks sure are comfortable and large on the inside.

    • @mejlokbshoptax577
      @mejlokbshoptax577 4 ปีที่แล้ว +142

      You are a foreigner and you don’t know that in KV 1 it’s uncomfortable and all the more so in a place. Most of the place is occupied by the reservation of the tank. This is the biggest mistake in our tanks, and yes I am from Russia

    • @evanroesch742
      @evanroesch742 4 ปีที่แล้ว +791

      @@mejlokbshoptax577 Apparently you guys don't have sarcasm in Russia either.

    • @jeremygaming1375
      @jeremygaming1375 4 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      Looks so real totally not like they put a cardboard cover over a car

    • @flakka1685
      @flakka1685 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@mejlokbshoptax577 all russian ww 2 tanks are uncomfortable

    • @liltoaster7308
      @liltoaster7308 4 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      @@mejlokbshoptax577 My goodness, it's sarcasm calm down.

  • @drcrow9664
    @drcrow9664 ปีที่แล้ว +183

    That KV has more room than my bathroom

    • @Abdul_Al_Hassred
      @Abdul_Al_Hassred 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They're not called "bath tubes" for no reason. ;)

  • @botai_
    @botai_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6829

    3 unbeatable things in the world:
    1. Chuck Norris
    2. Russian tank in a Russian movie
    3. Good Indian guy in a Bollywood movie

    • @ardousjanardhanan3004
      @ardousjanardhanan3004 4 ปีที่แล้ว +118

      3 rd point😂😂😂😂

    • @grieferjesus3226
      @grieferjesus3226 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Underrated

    • @seafox6482
      @seafox6482 4 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      Ruslan , You have forgotten the fourth thing - unbeatable stupidity of your mind.

    • @amitjain7882
      @amitjain7882 4 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      Unfortunately, the Good Indian guy is unbeatable only in the movies! 🤪

    • @luizftavares
      @luizftavares 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@billwhelpley6825 those are not tiger mockups, they are Panzer 4s with the late war modifications against AT explosives. If Im not mistaken versions H and J had those.

  • @natural997
    @natural997 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4235

    Germans had an excellent strategy here; first, scurry from cover, then rush uphill, shoulder to shoulder, through the open field, straight toward the enemy tank, without firing more than a couple of times.

    • @natural997
      @natural997 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      @Lịch sử Đường sắt Vlog Fury has a multitude of problems, but we will not get into that.

    • @scottsmith1386
      @scottsmith1386 3 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      Yeah, right away I thought no way would they be bunched up like that. They would spread out wide.

    • @LastZeel
      @LastZeel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +268

      Russian movies are not for sense or story, Russian movies are all for loving mother Russia and proud of handmade history no matter what. Don't look for a logic there.

    • @alexgataric
      @alexgataric 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      And missing a stationary target or direct hits bouncing off like small arms fire.

    • @beesabee
      @beesabee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      @@LastZeel ok if you look at any war movie, or even just a movie. Russians fighting against Americans or anyone else, who’s gonna win? Russians. In American movies who’s gonna win against another? Americans. The list goes on. Everyone wants to prove they’re better than the other

  • @skorpius2029
    @skorpius2029 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3387

    German tank platoon commander: C'mon guys lets advance as close as possible to them and shoot on the move . Also stay as close to each other as possible. It will look cooler and might intimidate the enemy.

    • @lasselippert3892
      @lasselippert3892 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      No wonder those dipshits lost the war

    • @niaagustina4142
      @niaagustina4142 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      @@lasselippert3892 yeah , german tank is strong and powerful but still defeated by their own stupidity and greediness

    • @Cykadelia
      @Cykadelia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +145

      @@lasselippert3892
      It's a movie, not a documentary.

    • @lasselippert3892
      @lasselippert3892 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      [WR] Pilot
      Exactly. Which is what makes all the comment section wehraboos sound so ridiculous.

    • @imreallynoob8311
      @imreallynoob8311 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      German tank has high quality but allies tank has high quantity

  • @theostrichbird9021
    @theostrichbird9021 2 ปีที่แล้ว +518

    as a war thunder player, I can confirm this is indeed a fair fight

    • @Zero59663
      @Zero59663 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Ah a man of class

    • @polarfachero7312
      @polarfachero7312 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😐

    • @yousaywhat3363
      @yousaywhat3363 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      totally no russian bias going on here

    • @razortk77g95
      @razortk77g95 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@yousaywhat3363 like Fr how is that Kv 1 doing a 3v1

    • @juannieves8642
      @juannieves8642 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      ​@@yousaywhat3363 Bro the KV during ww2 had insane storys ☠️

  • @PatTheRiot
    @PatTheRiot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5459

    Its a true story. German panzers were known to feast on random artillery explosions in the field, rushing towards it frantically. And the KV-1 tank was the roomiest tank in history. Sporting a 2 bedroom unit and a mezzanine.

    • @drewdrew2970
      @drewdrew2970 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      LOL

    • @mad_hp9473
      @mad_hp9473 3 ปีที่แล้ว +136

      Yeah... good joke

    • @rcair123
      @rcair123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +91

      I was in a decommissioned sherman tank when I like 12 there was enough room for me and 2 more children if none of us had a big lunch.

    • @kurushpars8939
      @kurushpars8939 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      In Russia, they laugh at modern Russian films about the war. They are all saturated with falseness according to the rules of Hollywood, the lack of logic, the ridiculous tantrums of the heroes and inappropriate religion, but real history in the society of the prevailing scientific approach and atheism. All this is nonsense and lies about the real war that the USSR and the Soviet people waged against Hitler, who was armed with the money of the capitalists, and who was supposed to destroy the state of workers and peasants, which prevented the rich from exploiters from all over the world. In Russia, they love films about the war made in the 60s and 80s, during the Soviet era, they were honest about people, albeit weak in terms of effects.

    • @WalterModel45
      @WalterModel45 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      That tanks there are no even panzer

  • @carlos89784
    @carlos89784 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4372

    Germans were perfectly hidden, but decide to come out in the open for no reason and miss several shots.

    • @ksekhose8933
      @ksekhose8933 4 ปีที่แล้ว +524

      Sounds like Fury to me

    • @jaredhall1482
      @jaredhall1482 4 ปีที่แล้ว +324

      And even better is that panzer crews were trained to stop and fire, being instructed that firing on the move was nothing more than a waste of ammunition

    • @userjlj
      @userjlj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +98

      and on top of that, they had to close in when the long barrel 75mm L48 can take on that KV at those ranges..

    • @stormraider7686
      @stormraider7686 4 ปีที่แล้ว +109

      Never shoot while moving. War thunder has taught me this much about tanks.

    • @donfox776
      @donfox776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      This movie is fraude...

  • @dy031101
    @dy031101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1126

    "Are there any problems?"
    Yes, my dude- you're asking a KV-1 to go fast.

    • @thelastdaygamer8702
      @thelastdaygamer8702 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      I see you haven't played war thunder yet. 😌

    • @greenscreen1248
      @greenscreen1248 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Да братука 😂😂😂

    • @greenscreen1248
      @greenscreen1248 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thelastdaygamer8702 кв 1 Сильные 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻

    • @janakolesarova687
      @janakolesarova687 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@greenscreen1248 Да, товарищ, да

    • @rexmexzilla
      @rexmexzilla 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Slap a turbo charger and suspetion on the fucker, smooth ride and prem consumables

  • @boratunastopmotion2024
    @boratunastopmotion2024 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    When you play chess against yourself:

  •  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2773

    -Tiger scene in Fury is the most ridiculous tank fight I have ever seen in a movie.
    This scene: Hold my vodka...

    • @yippers7230
      @yippers7230 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Whaaat? I didn’t think it was so bad.

    • @marcokerbl6896
      @marcokerbl6896 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      You know that teh scenes were pretty real compared to other ww2 movies, both of em

    • @paknamchan664
      @paknamchan664 3 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      the tiger scene were the fakes, no tiger would charge forward, the tanks could hit the tiger into the driver area, both literally gave up their advantages.

    • @MaliqIbrahim-1306
      @MaliqIbrahim-1306 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@paknamchan664 and Fury has a 76mm wich could already kill the Tiger!!!!!!!!!! Odd huh?

    • @ironkun7304
      @ironkun7304 3 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      @@MaliqIbrahim-1306 and the Tiger were suppose the hit the first tank of the tank squad not the last tank, that's how WWII Nazi Germany tactics works for tank battles, Fury have a very heavy plot armor for sure lmao

  • @berbo4063
    @berbo4063 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3357

    Three German tanks missing every shot on only just one Russian tank is what i call Hollyvood topic

    • @exoticdachoo007
      @exoticdachoo007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +143

      i mean they were moving and german tanks didnt have stabilizers so everything is possibe

    • @stealthcone
      @stealthcone 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Ber Bo they are firing on the move like bellends

    • @exoticdachoo007
      @exoticdachoo007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@stealthcone yea thats what i said too its weird that people dont notice that stuff instantly

    • @exoticdachoo007
      @exoticdachoo007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@user-cm7uo3yc8z I mean if they hit the hull the shot would be an easy penetration since 75mm guns could easily go in the 90mm hull

    • @historiousedward4145
      @historiousedward4145 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@user-cm7uo3yc8z that 7,5cm kwk 40 is strong enough on that distance againts KV series armours, but again, they are shooting on the move so that could be an issue.

  • @tempest411
    @tempest411 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1655

    Well, at least they got the part about the KV1 breaking down correct.

    • @emekmek3197
      @emekmek3197 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      th-cam.com/video/b9FunEkhTNo/w-d-xo.html ,.,..

    • @kokop.1610
      @kokop.1610 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Ya only that part apparently

    • @kons37flyingreaperoldchann21
      @kons37flyingreaperoldchann21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Gets shot more then enough with no damage at all and even when it misses it still damages enemy tanks, idk but I think they were pressured that the Russians must win

    • @marocho129
      @marocho129 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@kons37flyingreaperoldchann21 This actually happened but in 1941 (on that day 5 KV-1 tanks took out 43 panzers) so the T-34/85 and Pz IV ausf. H tanks are completely out of place (and out of time) and the only tank this scene got (mostly) right is the KV :D It faced mostly early Pz.IV (with short gun) and Pz 35(t) tanks which really couldn't cause much damage to it. Here's a good informative video on this battle :) th-cam.com/video/UELuC69pszE/w-d-xo.html

    • @t15661
      @t15661 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I guess they also got wrong the point where Germany loses the war.

  • @kingofsomething3250
    @kingofsomething3250 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    That KV-1 looking hella spacious, you could put a jacuzzi in that thing

    • @Tiger3000dk
      @Tiger3000dk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Beautiful like a lada!

  • @snorp6781
    @snorp6781 3 ปีที่แล้ว +645

    "Load Sabot"
    "..."
    "Sir this is a KV-1"

    • @mr.laughington5740
      @mr.laughington5740 3 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      Wrong translation, they're just armor piercing and high explosive shells

    • @Kajak80
      @Kajak80 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Very bad subtitles

    • @urbangng496
      @urbangng496 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It is not KV-1 tank it is modifated T-34/85

    • @Kriegloaf
      @Kriegloaf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@urbangng496 depending on the suspension,it seems like it's a modified IS or IS-2

    • @deeznoodlezz
      @deeznoodlezz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@Kriegloaf I'm not seeing what you are. Where does the tank look like an is1 or is2?. I see a kv1 chassis and turret.

  • @goyslop4289
    @goyslop4289 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3083

    The only based on a true story part of this movie is the gear box grenading.

    • @Cbrmkn98xs
      @Cbrmkn98xs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +106

      @@pepperminth8085 you fucking okay? Hes not even talking anything related to the Nazis

    • @justzockit4471
      @justzockit4471 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      @@pepperminth8085 dude check what you are writing here

    • @vincentmajzoub5867
      @vincentmajzoub5867 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      @@pepperminth8085 please tell me this is a joke, are you fucking insane???

    • @thohahussin5035
      @thohahussin5035 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      @@pepperminth8085 lol what the dog doin

    • @MaximumDo
      @MaximumDo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      shut up usa kid
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinoviy_Kolobanov

  • @drillinstructorfitch5875
    @drillinstructorfitch5875 4 ปีที่แล้ว +540

    Panzer: Ricochet!
    Panzer: That one bounced!
    KV-1; We hit them hard!
    KV-1: Enemy armour is destroyed!
    KV-1: Enemy Vehicle destroyed!
    VICTORY
    KV-1: 3 Kills/1500 Damage
    Map: Malinovka

    • @omar_xxnader9246
      @omar_xxnader9246 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      World of tanks

    • @TryHardln
      @TryHardln 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      3000 dmg wat? Even my IS Won’t do that much in a match lol

    • @wolframpz-2734
      @wolframpz-2734 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lmao 3k dmg?

    • @kytinzogratis615
      @kytinzogratis615 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't forget: We did it! We won!

    • @rudolfsteihelm3128
      @rudolfsteihelm3128 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually, The ZiS-5 gun has less destructive performance if you compare this to HwK40 gun that mounted on Panzer IV H, and HwK 40 gun that can penetrate up to 176mm. at 100m. can easily penetrate KV1 turret armor as it thick for only 90mm. destroying turret ring and injure crew member or worse trigger the ammunition rag and shit everything up.

  • @AFT_05G
    @AFT_05G 2 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    KV-1s were easy targets for long barreled Panzer IVs,it was the the ones with short 37mm and 75mm barrels which struggled to penetrate armors of KV-1s and T-34s.

    • @Spido68_the_spectator
      @Spido68_the_spectator ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Panzer IVs only had 75 mm guns (short then long).
      The 37 mm was on Panzer IIIs (which then got the 50 mm and then the long 50 mm which finally could do damage)

    • @firebat1320
      @firebat1320 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      This is based off a real tank battle, however the KV-1 fought PZ2 and PZ38s. Not sure if PZ3s were there but I dont think so.

    • @BanzaiYoutubeChannel
      @BanzaiYoutubeChannel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@firebat1320 It was Panzer 38t and Panzer III ausf N I think

    • @funny_joke_goes_here4406
      @funny_joke_goes_here4406 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Spido68_the_spectatorthe 37mm/short 50mm could kill T-34s and KV-1s. Or did the insane amounts of T-34s and KV-1s being destroyed by the Pz IIIs in 1941 pass your mind?

    • @mark_sugar42
      @mark_sugar42 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@funny_joke_goes_here4406 many Soviet tanks in the first few months of Barbarossa were abandoned or destroyed by their crews as they ran out of fuel and the logistics were in complete disarray

  • @aewhatever
    @aewhatever 4 ปีที่แล้ว +648

    They're walking around the inside that tank like is a size of a living room

    • @StephanO.-qy6ny
      @StephanO.-qy6ny 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      🤣🤣🤣 yes. And the Germans were blind.

    • @secondchance6603
      @secondchance6603 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      LMAO!!

    • @_S.T.A.L.K.E.R._
      @_S.T.A.L.K.E.R._ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@StephanO.-qy6ny nah they are just moving without stabilizers

    • @ervanaugusto791
      @ervanaugusto791 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try KV2

    • @marcoanonymous8434
      @marcoanonymous8434 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      yes, due to budget cuts, they only showed you this. We never saw it's cellar, bedrooms and kitchen.

  • @benchkid0375
    @benchkid0375 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1084

    Lol the whole Red Army could fit in that tank.

    • @Mirda-bg3pi
      @Mirda-bg3pi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      Tank looks like a empty box from the inside..

    • @benchkid0375
      @benchkid0375 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Mirda-bg3pi yea lol

    • @rags417
      @rags417 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      They don't show scale - each tanker was probably only 5 foot 2 !

    • @hairol1895
      @hairol1895 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ja

    • @anupamapant4817
      @anupamapant4817 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      it was really like that.
      the kv 1 was the most spacious tank of ww2.

  • @Lazarenko93
    @Lazarenko93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2910

    "Mum can we watch Fury?"
    Mum: We have Fury at home.
    *Fury at home*

    • @reven06
      @reven06 3 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      Yeah, like Fury's any better.

    • @Lazarenko93
      @Lazarenko93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      @@reven06 The Germans in Fury and this film are concistent... lets drive towards them!

    • @wanderingman50
      @wanderingman50 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@Lazarenko93 there is a tactic called blitzkrieg

    • @Lazarenko93
      @Lazarenko93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      @@wanderingman50 You really need to do some reading/research if you call this blitzkrieg...

    • @wanderingman50
      @wanderingman50 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Lazarenko93 I never did say the tactics on this movie was blitzkrieg I just said there was a tactic called blitzkrieg and basically what the panzers was trying to do was rush the tank and out flank it.

  • @Baegitte
    @Baegitte ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fury: highly accurate movie, bravo

  • @TankUni
    @TankUni 4 ปีที่แล้ว +708

    Looks like the Russians were playing with 100% plot armor enabled.

    • @iileross8398
      @iileross8398 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Орк Ур-Шак By 1942 the Tiger had come out and ruined that armour record. And the next year in 1943, the Panther, Ferdinand and Brummbar existed. The Pak 40 could also penetrate it.

    • @Ext3rmin4tor
      @Ext3rmin4tor 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @Орк Ур-Шак Not true, the KwK 40 L/48 of those Panzer IV could pierce it at 700m

    • @deVeresd.Kfz.1515
      @deVeresd.Kfz.1515 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They're sloped like hell. The Panzers kept hitting the turret's head and side areas, which could easily deflect those 76mm rounds. If it was a Tiger II round, then it would most likely penetrate it. A T-34's opticals were less advanced compared to the Panzer IV's, but its sloped armour is strong enough to deflect a 76mm AP round from the Panzer IV

    • @commiedotstar4616
      @commiedotstar4616 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah but these are panzer 4s we talking bout the could go through that armour like a hot knife through butter

    • @TankUni
      @TankUni 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@deVeresd.Kfz.1515 All I'm saying is that this Russian tank is obviously equipped with the rare but highly effective unexplodium armor plating.

  • @mrki412
    @mrki412 4 ปีที่แล้ว +616

    If the Germans were this good they would never make it out of Berlin.

    • @synek702
      @synek702 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ty chyba historii nie rozumiesz cymbale jak walczyli na 2 fronty i nie mieli zasobów to co się dziwić

    • @mrki412
      @mrki412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@synek702 please use world wide understandable language. Thank you.

    • @ДмитрийЧернышев-щ2н
      @ДмитрийЧернышев-щ2н 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrki412 use Google translate. Polska mova ничем не хуже английской.

    • @mrki412
      @mrki412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@ДмитрийЧернышев-щ2н for that bot languages? No way, TY.

    • @marluxia8832
      @marluxia8832 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@ДмитрийЧернышев-щ2н Польская мова нафиг никому не нужна в России особо, как и любая другая славянская. Да она и сложная такая, что просто ппц. Даже мой брат-полукровка и то бросил идею польский выучить.

  • @joewolak9373
    @joewolak9373 3 ปีที่แล้ว +602

    The movement tactics trigger me “Hans let’s all move out of cover at the same time and drive in an open field without covering each other”

    • @raylast3873
      @raylast3873 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      They definitely get points off for not following established doctrine for either attacking or defending.

    • @pigbenis5295
      @pigbenis5295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      And also let's just blindly fire at the KV. It's not like all 3 of us would miss hitting a tank that is standing still right?

    • @paulprog9092
      @paulprog9092 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      actually the stupid thing on this scene is, an tank never takes shots while he is driving because it make the shots incredibly inaccurate, because your turret is wiggling and aiming is very difficult for your tank-crew.

    • @hubertwaldherr1760
      @hubertwaldherr1760 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Low on Pervetin.🤣

    • @stefanmijatovic5308
      @stefanmijatovic5308 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Panzer 4 is flat

  • @remy6978
    @remy6978 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    may not have been the most realistic movie with the tank scenes, BUT cinematically speaking was great. The faint music when he called the first target was a great start at the fight to come

    • @oliverfreitas8593
      @oliverfreitas8593 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Só you saying that real life is not realist enought for you? 💀💀💀💀

  • @jostimantatarigan7657
    @jostimantatarigan7657 4 ปีที่แล้ว +798

    The fact that the Russian Tank Crew still keep their cool after seeing 3 panzers is ridiculous.

    • @zeparthe16thspiritofarsgoe15
      @zeparthe16thspiritofarsgoe15 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Right those Tigers are monsters

    • @stevenlee4239
      @stevenlee4239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +125

      @@zeparthe16thspiritofarsgoe15 Those are Panzer 4s

    • @BewareTheNoid
      @BewareTheNoid 4 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      @@zeparthe16thspiritofarsgoe15 that KV-1 gun could slice through a Panzer 4 armour easily, and a Tiger 1's armour from the front if the tiger wasnt angled like the KV-1 is in the video

    • @ИмяФамилия-н6н6и
      @ИмяФамилия-н6н6и 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is-7

    • @BewareTheNoid
      @BewareTheNoid 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ИмяФамилия-н6н6и ?

  • @TikkunOlam_
    @TikkunOlam_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +706

    If it were to be realistic, none of them would have a working radio

    • @retardcorpsman
      @retardcorpsman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Ozjasz Goldberg
      That’s where the kicking comes in.
      You exit your tank, enter your teammates tank and kick him in the head with 45 N exactly. Now he’ll know to say roger the next time you repeat this process and command him to fire.

    • @Mr_Fancypants
      @Mr_Fancypants 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was about to mention that. Didn't the commanding tank use red flags?

    • @gmwpphs1899
      @gmwpphs1899 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@Mr_Fancypants depends what time period this movie takes place. For example, if it were in 1941, then the Russian tankers would be using the flags. Because they don't have radios in their tanks yet. But If this movie takes place between 1943-44, then, yes, they uses radios.

    • @paladinsix9285
      @paladinsix9285 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@gmwpphs1899 during the time of my military service from 1983 through 2014, most American combat vehicles had three flags (Green, Red, Yellow) to use during times of Radio silence, or if our radios malfunctioned. Keeping modern (1980's) radios such as the VRC 46 all up on a platoon/Company radio net was difficult. Even the SINGARS and other "ultra" modern radios up was not easy in Afghanistan, Iraq, or even in Training!
      More than once, we would perform a "commo check" in the motor pool, everybody would be up... We would drive the short distance to the ECP (Entry Control Point) of the FOB (Forward Operating Base) and one of the vehicles would have dropped off the net! Not to mention failures while we were on a Mission! That was a significant improvement from the 1980's! Now, imagine all the troubles with vacuum Tube AM Radios of the 1930's & 1940's!
      Russian Company, and Battalion Command Tanks had Radios, Platoon Leaders only had Receivers! Weirdly, a higher percentage of Pre-war Russian tanks had radios!
      ALL German tanks had radios.

    • @thebichocr7659
      @thebichocr7659 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mid 1944 / 45 they could have

  • @alihasanabdullah7586
    @alihasanabdullah7586 4 ปีที่แล้ว +263

    Let's see
    The KV1 is using the 76mm ZiS5 AT gun. The gun has around 75 millimeter of penetration at 500m with the BR350B APHE round. (No WW2 soviet tanks had APDS rounds, telling your loader to load sabot doesn't help magically spawn a sabot. Maybe he's referring to the APCR round (BR350P) which has 90 mm penetration at 500m, disregarding angles)
    The version of Panzer IV in the film is likely Ausf. H (judging by the L/48 KwK40 gun) which could fire PzGr 39 with 125mm of penetration at 500 meter range and had PzGr 40 APCR with 145mm penetration at 0 degree angles)
    The KV1 had hull armor of 100m (adding the front plates) and Turret armor of 90mm. The long 75 wouldn't have any trouble penetrating the KV1 at these ranges while the KV itself would be unable to penetrate the hull of the Panzer IV (with the upgraded 80mm hull armor in ausf H) and can only penetrate the 50mm turret.
    Even without considering the tactics, this video is factually incorrect.

    • @user-mo7dd1vt1s
      @user-mo7dd1vt1s 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      its a movie, not some PhD mandata

    • @FookFish
      @FookFish 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you can see they tried to aim at the drivers cupola and the mg mantlet where the armour is thinner, may they actually hit it?

    • @framstagbeipenny6353
      @framstagbeipenny6353 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks dude

    • @nerokota
      @nerokota 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      IIRC, the movie is set in 1941, so the Germans would not have long 75 PZIVs anyway (or the Soviets T34/85s for that matter).

    • @artelislt
      @artelislt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-mo7dd1vt1s It is biased

  • @AFT_05G
    @AFT_05G ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Ah,good ol Panzer IVs.Always the underdogs in movies.This could’ve been realistic if these tanks were early Panzer IV variants,not the fricking Aust H from 1943 which could easily destroy KV-1s.

    • @alexanderyampolski5596
      @alexanderyampolski5596 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Совершенно верно, в точку!!! От танков с такими пушками спасал только рикошет. КВ-1 убивал немцев в 1941-42 году очень много, но здесь танки 43 года

    • @oliverfreitas8593
      @oliverfreitas8593 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You really wants 1943's tanks in 1941, you might bé really dumb

  • @oswald1068
    @oswald1068 3 ปีที่แล้ว +820

    Actually, this scene is what the russian tank chief is dreaming of

    • @StephanO.-qy6ny
      @StephanO.-qy6ny 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Russian tanks were destroyed by the Germans. Stupid unrealistic clip.

    • @StephanO.-qy6ny
      @StephanO.-qy6ny 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Christopher Fischetti indeed. And the Russians missed while the Germans produced hit after hit.

    • @StephanO.-qy6ny
      @StephanO.-qy6ny 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Christopher Fischetti i totally agree, the supply lines were to long. Nevertheless a big mistake of the Germans to fight at two fronts. The Russians had a non ending supply of troops, equipment and others. War is stupid, nobody wins, everyboby loses.

    • @Loup-mx7yt
      @Loup-mx7yt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      tolik lisiy Stalin wanted to buy time and stay on the defensive as to not show signs of agression to the Nazis. Hitler had to invade the USSR, destroying communism and exterminating the Slavs was a part of mein kampf and of the fascist ideology.

    • @StephanO.-qy6ny
      @StephanO.-qy6ny 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@you4love2me a film maker.. 😉

  • @Ace-rp7vr
    @Ace-rp7vr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +597

    Of course the panzers don’t stop to shoot and they miss 80% shots of course

    • @NotOzy
      @NotOzy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      Propaganda at it’s finest

    • @Ace-rp7vr
      @Ace-rp7vr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Ozy yep allied propaganda

    • @wonderfluff4830
      @wonderfluff4830 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Why the hell did they approached at all? I don't think a 75 mm can pen a KV-1 frontally.

    • @carlphilipedmundbertil625
      @carlphilipedmundbertil625 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Russian tanks is a best! 😊

    • @NotOzy
      @NotOzy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@carlphilipedmundbertil625 not even close

  • @orbital_stryker5982
    @orbital_stryker5982 3 ปีที่แล้ว +511

    Those panzers have the aim of stormtroopers

    • @Darth_Barnaby
      @Darth_Barnaby 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      "Only Imperial Stormtroopers Are So Precise"

    • @_ZERO
      @_ZERO 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      To be fair, they didnt have stabilizers and were shooting while moving on uneven field so yeah they wouldve missed a lot actually

    • @sicariomonarch
      @sicariomonarch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You could call them SturmPanzerd

    • @orbital_stryker5982
      @orbital_stryker5982 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sicariomonarch lol

    • @orbital_stryker5982
      @orbital_stryker5982 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@_ZERO there are is such thing as an excuse for missing a shot -master oogway of tonks

  • @АйнурЗайнутдинов-г1о
    @АйнурЗайнутдинов-г1о ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Такое ощущение как будто это не танк, а двухкомнатная квартира, спокойно разгуливают внутри)))

  • @eibhearedsonclarke4518
    @eibhearedsonclarke4518 3 ปีที่แล้ว +460

    “Load sabot”
    “IVAN GET THE TIME MACHINE”

    • @dugunkhongorzul6866
      @dugunkhongorzul6866 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      best comment underrated

    • @sting2death2
      @sting2death2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Wrong translation, in Russian they said High-Explosive and Armor-Piercing. Not HEAT and Sabot.

    • @randomguyontheinternet6885
      @randomguyontheinternet6885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sting2death2 and HEAT shells are only for tank destroyer at that time

    • @jimig.688
      @jimig.688 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@randomguyontheinternet6885 HEAT shells were developed for a number of guns and tanks, but they were very rare.

    • @thomasbummer4361
      @thomasbummer4361 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hahaha my thoughts, underrated

  • @totoro7725
    @totoro7725 3 ปีที่แล้ว +502

    Radio-set in every tank. An incredible luxury at that time.

    • @zeffy._440
      @zeffy._440 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah most did not have radio sets early on and even mid way through the war

    • @namduong6051
      @namduong6051 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      it's around 1944 tho, there're T-34-85s with S-53 gun in the film

    • @totoro7725
      @totoro7725 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@namduong6051 This is not a documentary, but since the film about Semyon Konovalov should be 1942.

    • @thegrayknight71
      @thegrayknight71 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Yeah the russians didn't have radio in the tanks in 1941. They actually communicated using flags. Now, how easy do you think it was so see the flags during combat with all the smoke from the engine and gun? He-he. The russians had a lot of losses in 1941-1942.

    • @roberthuehn6562
      @roberthuehn6562 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      You mean for Russians? Because radio was existend in every German tank

  • @riccardosalardino9643
    @riccardosalardino9643 3 ปีที่แล้ว +963

    Me : Let’s watch this movie scene
    Russian tank commander : has radio
    Me : ok, it’s time to go

    • @cyka7705
      @cyka7705 3 ปีที่แล้ว +119

      @@matztertaler2777 well since there's t-34-85 it's probably around 1944. They have radios on their tanks back then. The soviet isnt exactly lacking radio. But more like lacking reliable radios

    • @Thebuzzki11er
      @Thebuzzki11er 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      You would think that with a half-baked knowledge of history.

    • @riccardosalardino9643
      @riccardosalardino9643 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@cyka7705 that’s partially true, I didn’t recognise that these were t 34 85, anyway the soviets started to equip their tanks with radios in 1944, but only the new ones and very few of the old ones, so all of their tanks wouldn’t have radios, and also they broke very frequently, so it was nearly impossible to have a platoon of tanks all equipped with radios.

    • @stepbigbro4160
      @stepbigbro4160 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Me + your Comment + 68 like + I'm a man of culture = You have 69 like

    • @insectslayer1374
      @insectslayer1374 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      **waves Flag to pay respects to panzers**

  • @叵sea_muffin叵
    @叵sea_muffin叵 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    It is a very well known fact that the KV-1 carried Sabot rounds before they were in widespread use.

  • @ИммануилБормотухин
    @ИммануилБормотухин 4 ปีที่แล้ว +104

    - What are we waiting for?
    - Calm down, I know for sure they will miss first 3 shots.

  • @michelegiampieri4237
    @michelegiampieri4237 3 ปีที่แล้ว +957

    German tank crews never would have missed a static target twice :P

    • @bonkey8235
      @bonkey8235 3 ปีที่แล้ว +136

      And german tank crews would of never rushed so stupidly and they would of penetraged that kv-1 in no time 😅

    • @michelegiampieri4237
      @michelegiampieri4237 3 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      @@bonkey8235 KV-1 were easily penetrated by Panzer IV as we see in this scene. KV-1 were good against panzer II and III (version without 75mm long gun), but in this scene we have Panzer IV and Panzer III Ausf.G so it's a great mistake. Except for the T-34 in the mobility capacity, that was perfect for mud and swamp, Soviet tanks were not at the same levels of German Panzers, till JS.2, and this is history, no fiction! Russians last 15 years war-movies are the most unreallistic things ever created, see T-34, this one and lot of others.

    • @vmfeldsher
      @vmfeldsher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      They wouldn't,but in this fight,they were firing while movin',so no wonder they couldn't hit

    • @michelegiampieri4237
      @michelegiampieri4237 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      @@vmfeldsher Tank crews are trained for hit target in every situation, even movin and expecially the germans, who were the master of tanks in the world during that time. This scene is completely inaccurate and irrealistic but not problem: russian war movies during the Putin Era are made for create such myths of Red Army against Wehrmacht, so I can understand this. Red Army had good points and excellence as snipers, spy, some single soldier weapons (PPSH > MP40), good artillery, rocket katiuscia...but in panzers they always were under the germans from the beginning till the end, except for the T-34 in late 1941 early 1942. One of the last soviet tanks (JS-2) was created for oppose the King Tiger but it was used in the last two-three months of war in 1945 and it was perfectly at the range of King Tiger, even if he had a 122mm gun, but the high-velocity AP 88mm of King Tiger were enough for penetrate the flank of the tanks making him useless...

    • @vmfeldsher
      @vmfeldsher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@michelegiampieri4237 Trainin',well,inaccuracy goes up greatly while moving,better training won't mean that there's a high chance to hit the target.I understand that Germans were the best tankers,but firing on the move,especially a medium tank,and a T-4 Heavy,not too sensible.The Putin thing,ofc,propaganda has gone to a new lvl now,it's more complex than before,ofc they r just puttin' propaganda in their films,understandable.Then,the IS-2 wasn't there ONLY in the last 2-3 months,it was there from before that late,and even tho 122mm shells didn't penetrate the Tiger's armor reliably,it displaced major parts,deformed and deshaped most of the armor,many crews would die,and the shell would often reach the ammo rack,and thus kill the Tiger;IS-2 could do this from 600m.And T-34s,oh god,can ppl just stop overrating this?I mean,ofc,T-34-mod.45 was the best medium tank of WWII,but in 1942,they OVERsimplified the design of the tank,which led to loss of many parts,this was worsened cuz workers weren't well trained,and the tanks were rushed into production,so these tanks often broke down VERY quickly.Moreover,the T-34 tank's commander couldn't do his job effectively,crew survivability was WAY too low,and Panzer IVs(When equipped with those long cannons) could pen the armor.Also,it wasn't INVULNERABLE,as many ppl say.Many destroyed T-34s from the Pz-III times,were from shots from the sides,Pz.IVs could pen the frontal armor,not that it was invulnerable anymore,armor's thickness and crampedness led to even HOWITZERS havin' good effects,altho Germans just used their long Pz.IV guns more,and overall,the T-34s did perform very badly in 1942.In 1941,the only place they did good was head on facing,from around a mile,where they could easily penetrate the Pz.IIIs with inferior pen and armor,other than that,very few places where the T-34s had actual trained crews,and/or had a good kill:loss ratio.
      But this scene,well,it seemed weird to me too,even with more tanks,and a newer T-4 heavy being on their side,Germans wouldn't act THIS dumb out of overconfidence,that they'd straight up just rush the KV-1 and fire,whereas they could just move a little outwards,and fire

  • @muki2259
    @muki2259 4 ปีที่แล้ว +289

    If this video was realistic it would be like this:
    KV1's are heading towards the village, and Panzers are not 10 feet away. And when KV1's are close eniugh, German Panzers fire at KV1's while still holding their positions. If German Panzers were this bad WW2 wouldn't last 3 months

    • @Akeno0002
      @Akeno0002 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Uhm those T-34-85s are a sign ww2 was drawing close already

    • @muki2259
      @muki2259 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Akeno0002 KV2's actually

    • @Empirehog
      @Empirehog 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@muki2259 Nope, they were T-34-85s medium tanks and a single KV-1 heavy tank.

    • @muki2259
      @muki2259 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Empirehog I tought genneraly, that KV2 tanks were the point of counter offensive, but you are right. We just didn't understand each other well

    • @you4love2me
      @you4love2me 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol but Kalabanov on kv1 kill more enemy tanks ! Learn History

  • @alexprokhorov407
    @alexprokhorov407 3 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    I bet that tank has a bathroom, a shower, and a kitchen in it. It went all the way to Berlin without refueling.

  • @A42081
    @A42081 4 ปีที่แล้ว +662

    "This movie is sponsored by World Of Tanks

    • @RandomYoutubeUser69
      @RandomYoutubeUser69 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Ads are getting smarter

    • @A42081
      @A42081 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Adam Elektrik enerjisiコメント欄、返信等は殆ど観ません i don't speak chinesse!!!

    • @arayganakal
      @arayganakal 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ini film apa bro?

    • @A42081
      @A42081 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@arayganakal T-34

    • @bayurukmanajati1224
      @bayurukmanajati1224 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Tier 5/6 match - in a nutshell.

  • @paulbobenhausen8031
    @paulbobenhausen8031 4 ปีที่แล้ว +415

    This is silly, German tanks would not have been firing on the move, even at that range. Frankly, they wouldn't have driven out of the village anyway.

    • @andresdubon2608
      @andresdubon2608 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Even if they would, german panzer had better guns, better sights even more preper crew.
      Totally unimpressive.

    • @Jakezillagfw
      @Jakezillagfw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@andresdubon2608 Yep Russian tanks were made to run for about 1 battle. Just goes to show the ideology of quality vs quantity.

    • @atk1152
      @atk1152 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      agree, german tankers use ambush tactical or long range attack most of the time, this is just dumb

    • @gmwpphs1899
      @gmwpphs1899 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@andresdubon2608 you got it have right. You said that the German panzer 4 have better gun than the KV-1. Actually, KV-1 is armed with a 76mm gun, while the panzer 4 is equipped with a 75mm.

    • @andresdubon2608
      @andresdubon2608 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@gmwpphs1899 I'm not just talking about the power, there is accuracy, resilience, general quality.
      And just for you, yes.
      Germans did gott you on the power side as well.
      Remember me the most powerful/effective tank gun of mid 1941- 1942.
      Oh, yeah.
      88mm of the panzerkampfwagen VI.

  • @Robozgraggi
    @Robozgraggi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Laughable tactics and historical inaccuracies aside - those are actually really nice Panzer IV mock ups!

  • @Reket11
    @Reket11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +566

    A few things: 1. Shooting on the move? The panzer 4 had no stabilization .. 2. The KV had good armor in 1941, but these Pz4's are late models (version H I think) with a long 75mm cannon (7.5 cm KwK 40 L/48) which could penetrate a KV's frontal armor (116 - 141 mm penetration at 750m - depending on the ammo). Also, they positioned their tank in such a way, that the frontal plate, which has a bit of a slope, would be hit at a 90 degree angle totally negating the slope advantage. And they could get hit under the bulge around the cannon - this angle makes that area a shell trap. 3. The pz4 H had 80mm armor in the front and 50mm on the turret - penetration was possible (depending on the ammo) even through the front armor, but German optics where better and they could engage at a much longer distance. The ammo they are using (looks like BR-350P
    armour-piercing, composite rigid (APCR)) had 60mm pen at 1000m and 92mm at 500. So, the German tanks could shoot from far away, penetrate the KV, probably not get hit in return and even if, only a turret hit would penetrate. Also, the shell would have to go through the front armor, through the crew compartment and penetrate the engine to do what the movie shows (light up the engine). And how does a tank keep going after it's engine explodes like that?

    • @DerUngarischeKitsune
      @DerUngarischeKitsune 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Facts

    • @KpK1Cioby
      @KpK1Cioby 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I honestly thought those are Tiger tanks, which made the movie all the more ridiculous.

    • @Thunderbolt_1000_Siren
      @Thunderbolt_1000_Siren 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Pretty sure they're in the KV-1E. A KV-1 modded with thicker bolted armor.

    • @tangoechobravo806
      @tangoechobravo806 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      Aye this guy plays warthunder/world of tanks and now he's a historian!

    • @tomfennesy9105
      @tomfennesy9105 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      What year is this supposed to happen. T-34-85 operating with a kv-1. Seems mighty unlikely.

  • @loris4520
    @loris4520 4 ปีที่แล้ว +454

    That's the most unrealistic movie I have ever seen to be honest

    • @greatwhitetribe2714
      @greatwhitetribe2714 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      ofcourse. It is made by russians what do you expect....

    • @ULTRA_2112
      @ULTRA_2112 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      You´ve played to much video games!
      This is realistic!
      In 1941 and 1942 german panzers sucked against the KV Tank.
      pt-br.facebook.com/sovietmrs/posts/real-heroes-of-ww2-tankman-semyon-konovalov-tankman-semyon-konovalov-several-tim/1848600085158524/
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kliment_Voroshilov_tank#Models
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankers_(film)

    • @greatwhitetribe2714
      @greatwhitetribe2714 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@ULTRA_2112 tell me one videogame, where the german army dominates, bullshit they are always being showed as weak and incompetent, I think the only one who is wrong is you, youve listened to some soviet idiots which have been trained to spread propaganda. there are countless documentaries about the strength of German tanks e.g. the Panther or the (king) tiger tanks.
      th-cam.com/video/raAx57MHH7k/w-d-xo.html
      the soviets relied on quantity instead of quality, the germans the other way around.

    • @loris4520
      @loris4520 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@ULTRA_2112 so ur telling me that the shitty Russian tanks can one shot a German tank??? And that obviously the Germans miss every shot??? Wtf

    • @ULTRA_2112
      @ULTRA_2112 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@greatwhitetribe2714: I´am German and this battle was in 1942.
      The german tanks were Panzer III G

  • @stopmotionwarehouse8986
    @stopmotionwarehouse8986 3 ปีที่แล้ว +731

    I like how every time a Russian tank fires, an explosion happens where he shell lands, even when an AP shell hits the ground

    • @sting2death2
      @sting2death2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Eh, these tropes are more common than not with most WW2 related movies.

    • @aytoad
      @aytoad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The ap shells of the panzers were apcbc-he-t, they died have3 some explosive, albeit very little

    • @stopmotionwarehouse8986
      @stopmotionwarehouse8986 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      From what I understood, I agree with what you say, but still the amount of explosion in an AP shell isn’t very much and not nearly as much as this movie showed

    • @aytoad
      @aytoad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@stopmotionwarehouse8986 yea dont mind the typos

    • @stopmotionwarehouse8986
      @stopmotionwarehouse8986 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah, it’s ok, English is hard. Where are you from?

  • @critical_crunch
    @critical_crunch ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I’m glad they at least broke some of the common misconceptions about the KV-1 in this scene, specifically with its constant malfunctions showing off exactly why it was not as effective on the battlefield as it was on paper.

  • @phantomsloyer
    @phantomsloyer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +572

    Fun fact! The Panzer 4 are modified T-54/T-55, you can see the roadwheels under the spaced armour. A Panzer 4 has 8 small roadwheels.

    • @МихаилПетренко-ч2в
      @МихаилПетренко-ч2в 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      А Т 34-85 вас не смутили? По фильму лето 1942 года))

    • @chrismario6371
      @chrismario6371 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      Good mocks ups, way better than the old movies where tigers where pattons and p4s were chaffees lol

    • @nilordgamer3215
      @nilordgamer3215 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Son panzer 3

    • @edwardkenway148
      @edwardkenway148 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      They look really good tho

    • @KarapuZ1K-f6g
      @KarapuZ1K-f6g 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No this t44

  • @stephansmith3570
    @stephansmith3570 2 ปีที่แล้ว +834

    There was a world war 2 Russian tank discovered not too many years ago (25 or so I think) with the dead crew still inside. It was covered with dirt and plants from the passage of time, so had gone undiscovered all those years. One of the tankers wrote what happened. They had gotten separated from their group and found themselves behind a column of german tanks. They decided to attack and destroyed a number of tanks, but got hit in the process. They got away with all of the crew fatally injured. The least injured crewman wrote the letter to his fiance describing the events and said he could die happy knowing he had done what he could to stop the invasion.

    • @stephanwelke3046
      @stephanwelke3046 2 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      Thats true... Tank crews always wrote letters...during fight or when they wounded...or still dying... LOL

    • @GyaanKiBateen
      @GyaanKiBateen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Is there a video n link available about that tank??

    • @kamilnowak7015
      @kamilnowak7015 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      I love Soviet fake letters of propaganda XD

    • @БУХАНКА-х6ь
      @БУХАНКА-х6ь 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@kamilnowak7015 не понял

    • @s1chezzz720
      @s1chezzz720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@БУХАНКА-х6ь реально

  • @recker7927
    @recker7927 4 ปีที่แล้ว +521

    German Geography class
    Teacher: What is the largest city in the world?
    Student: Stalingrad.
    Teacher: Why?
    Student: My grandfather said that they walked on same street for 6 months and never reached the end.
    xD

  • @SourrainTri
    @SourrainTri 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Soviet Tank: 2 T 34 and KV 1
    Germany's Tank: 3 Panzer

    • @tiagomonteiro130
      @tiagomonteiro130 ปีที่แล้ว

      Meanwhile in reality from captured German ww2 letters telling how the Soviets always attacked with 50 tanks and even a single 88mm could take all of them out

    • @bovverFS
      @bovverFS 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tiagomonteiro130 That is bullshit, no german tank of the WW2 has 50 grenades on board. Durin the battle of Kursk, a single Tiger I fought against 50 T-34 and take 22 of them out of the battle, the remaining T-34 retreated. Commander of that Tiger I was F. Staudegger. But in this clip, there are 3 medium sized german PzKpfw IV with 75mm guns and a heavy russian tank KV-1 (with a 76mm gun) and 2 medium sized T-24/85 with 85mm guns. So, the russian tanks are superior in firepower and armor. But in fact, no german tank commander would try to shoot while moving coz of the lack of gun stabilizers like in modern tanks. So, that scene is bullshit.

    • @Вася-о1т4ж
      @Вася-о1т4ж 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tiagomonteiro130 what movie is this in?

  • @questorio
    @questorio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +172

    ah, yes, the KV-1 with 6 feet of headroom in the hull.

  • @spamuraigranatabru1149
    @spamuraigranatabru1149 4 ปีที่แล้ว +205

    HEAT? SABOT? Is this a KV-1 or a T-72?
    *Sees the 'Panzer 4' up close*
    Nope, T-54/55.

    • @alicaljungberg3742
      @alicaljungberg3742 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      APFSDS!

    • @fRENxxso
      @fRENxxso 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Кв 1

    • @Gabriel-he6ih
      @Gabriel-he6ih 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Thats a Thin looking KV-1
      But *damn* those are some thicc Panzers

    • @spamuraigranatabru1149
      @spamuraigranatabru1149 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Gabriel-he6ih
      Ignore everything i put down before... The KV driver was center hull.
      It might be an IS with a removed turret like the T-54/PZ3... But it could actually be a real KV-1 with maybe a fake turret.
      Edit: Actually it is a turretless IS-1, because the driver is in the middle!

    • @castercamber
      @castercamber 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      American-like fire commands and modern ammo selections. Still, fun to watch. (I try not to overthink these kind of movies)

  • @panthakarndeeruek8636
    @panthakarndeeruek8636 4 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    I​ bet This​ movie​ has​ same director as​ Stalingrad

    • @sidexmabaho
      @sidexmabaho 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i think it's the director of the movie Fury, not Stalingrad

    • @50centgotshot9times
      @50centgotshot9times 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Absolute garbage director. His father (Bondarchuk) was a legend in Soviet cinema but unfortunately the son makes absolute garbage movies. Most modern Russian movies are total crap. Soviet movies are where it's at all day every day

    • @oliverfreitas8593
      @oliverfreitas8593 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I bet its the same from fury dude the Quality

  • @Username_120
    @Username_120 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is a KV tank. It had a 3-inch armor thickness around. In 1941, near Leningrad, one KV tank destroyed 22 enemy tanks in battle. There were more than 100 hits on KV, when KV came out of the battle, his tower was jammed. The KV in that battle was camouflaged, and the enemy tanks were lightly armored. It was a real battle, the tank was put on the monument after, it was all like a sieve, but it did its job

    • @astartesdylan9042
      @astartesdylan9042 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      and the amount of propaganda that was, convenient that most of the crew and their relatives "disappeared"

  • @Kefp_mimi
    @Kefp_mimi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +601

    In fact, the German tank crews were supposed to stand still to fire. German tanks have a more advanced targeting system than the Soviets. So they have a greater advantage when fighting from a distance instead of driving closer. Most of their crew members are also highly trained. That includes having multiple cars. While the KV1 was lonely and the armor of the KV1 was not angled correctly at that moment. So it will be weaker. I guess German tankers, they're conscripts who haven't learned the principles?

    • @Yeahimman32
      @Yeahimman32 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      You forgot this is the type of WWII movie representing about their "great" allies with weak Germans running around without strategy and tactics

    • @sTiErLiTz876
      @sTiErLiTz876 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, even if kv1 did not have a guidance system, he would have won at a distance, his gun penetrates t3, but the Germans do not have this

    • @ripandteartillthelast
      @ripandteartillthelast 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      This film is russian fairytale. It has nothing from a real actions

    • @sheevpalpatine7588
      @sheevpalpatine7588 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Fury russian edition

    • @crimson7554
      @crimson7554 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@ripandteartillthelast keep crying,the panzer 4 armor is thin and can be pen by any soviet tanks.

  • @TheDaltonius
    @TheDaltonius 3 ปีที่แล้ว +278

    “Like hell they’ll puncture the KV’s armor”
    Me: but those guns, it ain’t the support variants

    • @eliasziad7864
      @eliasziad7864 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Can you stop having sex?

    • @armchairgeneralissimo
      @armchairgeneralissimo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Those are the guns that were fitted to Panzer 4 specifically to deal with KV-1 and T-34

    • @BobuxGuy
      @BobuxGuy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@armchairgeneralissimo Little did the Germans know what KV-1 armor is made out of stalinium

    • @timothyjonathan1599
      @timothyjonathan1599 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@BobuxGuy 75mm Panzer IV H variants can even kill a T-72. Yes Stalinium isn't match against Panzer IV Hs

    • @seal4622
      @seal4622 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@timothyjonathan1599 penetrate a t72 from where? It's roof?

  • @RasEli03
    @RasEli03 4 ปีที่แล้ว +301

    Finely a movie that sort of shows how much tanks break down.
    Why are there three panzers? Did the other tank also break down? And why are they moving towards the kv, in a close formation? They got the distance and the better gun.
    Why are one of the panzer 4 h's painted grey? And why are they firing on the move?
    They get the soviet tanks good. But german tanks B A D

    • @baddriversofmoosejaw8681
      @baddriversofmoosejaw8681 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      It's possible one of them broke down. It happens.
      The reason they're moving towards the KV is that they had to get close to penetrate its armour, even when equipped with a KwK 40. KVs didn't have as much armour as a Tiger, but could still take a lot of hits. Although this was in 1942 and Panzer IVs weren't equipped with KwK 40s until later in the war.
      Grey was a common colour on German vehicles of every type at that time. The ones in Africa were painted tan to help camouflage them with the sand. Some were painted camo, but most were grey. The German troops and Officers wore grey uniforms. It made them harder to spot.

    • @kimjongun7148
      @kimjongun7148 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@baddriversofmoosejaw8681 Bad Drivers of Moose Jaw the cannon I actually a kwk 40, a modified pak 40 to fit in the turret, also, the penetration of said gun could easily get through the kv1s armour as it has a penertating power of 97mm at 1000m. The kv1s armour is 90mm at the front, they were at a downwards angle, reducing the armour effectiveness, and thus could not of been over 90. The crew said 700m away, they were well within range of the panzers to destroy. The panzers would've stayed there for an ambush or flanked round, but not shot on the move. Even if it was the kv1e varient with added armour, it wouldn't of done anything as it only added armour on the sides of the turret. Send a Pzgr shell right through the 90m upper or lower plate, kaboom.

    • @baddriversofmoosejaw8681
      @baddriversofmoosejaw8681 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kimjongun7148 True, but I was also implying that the Panzer IVs used in this scene are wrong, since they weren't equipped with KwK 40s until later in the war, so if they used the designs that were used in 1942, this scene would be more accurate. Another thing wrong with this scene is that the T-34s are equipped with 85 mm guns and 3-man turrets. They never received those upgrades until 1944.
      They did that on Saving Private Ryan too. The 2 Tiger tanks at Ramelle were just T-34 85s with plywood attached and painted grey to make them look like Tigers. Another thing wrong with that scene was that the German division in that area didn't have any Tigers. They used Panzer IVs, so having 2 Panzer IVs like the ones in the video would've been accurate. That and the US Army only encountered 3 Tigers in the weeks after the breakout from Normandy. Most of the Tigers on the Normandy front were faced by the British and Canadian armies fighting north of the US Army and they too didn't encounter many, since the Germans didn't build many. Just over 1,400. Same thing as the KV. The Russians didn't build many and cancelled them after finding that an 85 mm gun could be fitted on the T-34. Also, the KV originally had the same 76 mm as the T-34, proving it was a waste to continue manufacturing them. Some KVs had howitzers, but still weren't many of them, although more than there were Tigers.

    • @angloirishcad
      @angloirishcad 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Because its typical infantile Russian propaganda

    • @kimjongun7148
      @kimjongun7148 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@baddriversofmoosejaw8681 lol, I guess we are never gonna get a historically accurate movie. The closest I can think of is. Actually I don't know to be honest, but a historical film is probably gonna be boring, you have to throw in some Hollywood otherwise people won't be interested.

  • @benphish
    @benphish ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Russian tank movies just hit different. Tankers, t-34, tanks for Stalin were all so much fun to watch.

    • @tiagomonteiro130
      @tiagomonteiro130 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They hit different for how unrealistic and dumb they are that KV-1 has more room then a family home😂

  • @fishy2584
    @fishy2584 4 ปีที่แล้ว +211

    Holy shit Hans,Martin and Otto were drunk they didn't hit a single shot

    • @RobertWF42
      @RobertWF42 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They hot several hits but the KV-1 frontal armor was thick. Also Germans were shooting on the run, more difficult to aim.

    • @fishy2584
      @fishy2584 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@RobertWF42 bitch they were perfectly covered they had no reason to rush,a normal driver would stop for the gunner this isn't World of Tanks boi

    • @pyatig
      @pyatig 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That was not KV armor that was unbreakable plot armor

    • @boop9494
      @boop9494 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fishy2584 thats what he was saying, SHOOTING ON THE RUN=MORE DIFFICULT TO AIM

    • @fishy2584
      @fishy2584 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I didn't talk about it

  • @thardracy2441
    @thardracy2441 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    The Germans must have had Star Wars troopers in there tanks.

    • @TatarProductions
      @TatarProductions 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      So true, the movie is too predictable that is russian, if that was so nazis would have fail invading france. their tanks were strong, as armor and engine.

    • @RsRj-qd2cg
      @RsRj-qd2cg 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      At least they hit the target, just didn't penetrate.

    • @cyanide-3421
      @cyanide-3421 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      cough dont forget about their "strong" transmission

    • @AnAmericanFan
      @AnAmericanFan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They were all red shirts

    • @DJSCRMNGHST
      @DJSCRMNGHST 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Technically yes

  • @arleighburnham1790
    @arleighburnham1790 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I like how the 3 German tanks decide to engage the KV by lining up perfectly 10 feet apart from each other and shooting, rather than spreading out.

  • @guythatsaguy
    @guythatsaguy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this is actually a pretty realistic movie since i never see a tank still driving in a movie after its been shot because who says that the driver is braking? also another thing is the panzer drives of-course which implies that he is still holding on to the wheel but just leaning abit because he is dead. very good movie :D

  • @thebatfilms5792
    @thebatfilms5792 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Mom: What are you watching?
    Me: Hollywood

  • @ryszakowy
    @ryszakowy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +163

    ok it's based on a true story
    in reality they could reverse with broken gear
    and survive few hits in that tank
    no german commander would just go in the open like that

    • @Oberataman
      @Oberataman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Every armchair general (especially from former soviet republics), know that Russian tanks can won only with superiority 800:1. And when J.V.Stalin personally sitting behind front line with Maxim MG and shoot retreating tanks 😉

    • @juan-hy6mp
      @juan-hy6mp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Fun fact : an irl KV 1 defeted 22 panzers in ww2

    • @MaximumDo
      @MaximumDo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinoviy_Kolobanov 156 hits on KV1
      now you know

    • @n-br..3416
      @n-br..3416 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      oooh fuck off it is just a movie stop doin' your jerk

    • @brunishka
      @brunishka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      On July 13, 1942, the tank crew under the command of Lieutenant Semyon Konovalov at the Nizhnemitakin farm in the Rostov region got up for repairs - the fuel supply system broke down at the "KV" ("KV" - Soviet heavy tank of the Great Patriotic War - ed.). We chose an advantageous position so that the enemy would not notice, the car was hidden in a hollow. German tanks soon appeared on the horizon. Without thinking twice, Konovalov commanded: "Fire!" The shell hit the target - the enemy tank was knocked out, the enemy could not strike back - the disguise of the Soviet tank was too successful. After the defeat of the tenth car, the Germans left the battlefield.
      Semyon Konovalov understood that the enemy would not just surrender and would definitely return with reinforcements. And so it happened. From the last forces the crew resisted, destroying a total of 22 German tanks, 4 gun crews and 2 armored vehicles. When an enemy shell immobilized a Soviet tank, Konovalov, along with two crew members, left the battlefield. For several days they wandered through the forest in search of their own. On the way, the soldiers saw an abandoned German tank. On it, the crew reached the front line, and in order not to be shot by their own soldiers, they turned the muzzle of the tank back, hung a rag and waved it like a white flag.

  • @jordancourse5102
    @jordancourse5102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +113

    What pissed me off the most was when he said “load sabot” in a KV-1

    • @mrconnacht3017
      @mrconnacht3017 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ikr

    • @DoubleDeltoid
      @DoubleDeltoid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Probably faulty translation, but I laughed my ass off when i read it

    • @ee214verilogtutorial2
      @ee214verilogtutorial2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It’s supposed to say “armor piercing” I guess it’s just a translation mistake

    • @alexprokhorov407
      @alexprokhorov407 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      He said AP round, but it doesn't matter. This whole thing is a joke to a joke

    • @MrUnimport
      @MrUnimport 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      and translating 'фугасный' as HEAT!

  • @DeepDarkz1011
    @DeepDarkz1011 ปีที่แล้ว

    I live the fact they are pretty chill inside the tank stuck but then win

  • @jamescollins275
    @jamescollins275 4 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    Russian tanks with radios I’m amazed

    • @vichothekiller6876
      @vichothekiller6876 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      And I’m amazed that a long 7.5cm gun did not pen the front of the turret of a kv1

    • @Godar14PL
      @Godar14PL 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vichothekiller6876 This is KV-1E - reinforced version with extra armor plates added, so not penetrating shots were quite possible. Ofcourse other things in this film are innacurate and stupid

    • @vichothekiller6876
      @vichothekiller6876 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Godar14 but it was a late 7.5 long cm gun, means that have more pen that the one of the F2 variant of pz 4, because the pz 4 in the movie are the H variant, the best variant of the pz4 and even a reinforced front turret of a KV-1 can’t stop it, only IS-1 and 2 could stop it or the front of lucky T-34-85 cuz the angles

    • @muffy469
      @muffy469 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lend lease

    • @tubeescort
      @tubeescort 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@muffy469 moron, russian tanks had radios since 1933 (called 1-TK-1, then 1-TK-2, 1-TK-3 and so on).

  • @billzkhan100
    @billzkhan100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Russian commander : "They are creeping out from the smoke.. Cockroaches..."
    Me :" Ummm.. No sir.. You just woke up 3 DINOSAURS"..

    • @sayanmitra5979
      @sayanmitra5979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Naah, Russian tanks were superior to German PANZERS in early war periods but then came the TIGER tank BOOM!

    • @ignacymoscickifilms670
      @ignacymoscickifilms670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sayanmitra5979 These were the long barrel panzer 4s, clearly late war with the armor skirts. This cannon would mop the floor with a direct hit on that KV-1. The 76mm cannon on that KV-1 is BARELY enough to penetrate panzer 4s late war 80mm armor at 90 degrees flat. That is at about a 100 meters and with i would say only 80% chance of success. At 500m it wouldn't even leave as much as a scratch. So yeah, the movie is a clear fantasy. But i enjoyed the russian chatter :D

    • @sayanmitra5979
      @sayanmitra5979 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ignacymoscickifilms670 yess i agree, and also thank you for the info you have given me. But in early war period, KV 1 was better, remember the Battle of Raseiniai where a KV 1 battle with an entire panzer division

    • @ignacymoscickifilms670
      @ignacymoscickifilms670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sayanmitra5979 You could argue the same with french tanks such as the Char B series. There was also a story of it competing against multiple panzers. While what you say is true, the russian tanks were even more misused than the french ones. Often sent out alone, without infantry support, they encountered well combined german forces. While early on the argument could be made of some russian tanks beeing better (especially KV-1 KV-2, and early models of T-34), most of them were not the heavy beasts that stopped entire batallions. In fact, most of russian tanks were disposable garbage, such as T-26. Heavier russian vehicles posed a large threat to the german army, though were most of the times unsupported and therefore easily outmanouvered. Also due to poor russian communications and generally unorganised force, germans were successful in surrounding and outnumbering most of the heavy tanks. See how favorable the german kill ratio was in the early war despite russians having some tanks that were theoretically unbeatable. Isolated cases of germans beeing "unlucky" were not enough to change the outcome of the early war. Thats all there is to it

    • @joskethegreat4154
      @joskethegreat4154 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sayanmitra5979 there was a huge difference between early war and late war. So yeah, you're right, kv1 were OP in the early war, but tanks were fitted with better guns to penetrate better so in the end kv1 became inferior compared to others like the IS series

  • @heikomankin3410
    @heikomankin3410 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    0:15 giving me flashbacks of my old Lada Niva :D

    • @TomKappeln
      @TomKappeln 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly !!! Had also one ... lol

  • @Whispers_of_Madness
    @Whispers_of_Madness ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm watching this on my Xbox and I had to log into my phone to comment on this ridiculous scene!

  • @calvinpeter2959
    @calvinpeter2959 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    "Like hell the panzer iv j will puncture the KV's armor!"
    War thunder: we don't do that here...

  • @linegamache8721
    @linegamache8721 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    commander: go faster
    Driver: DISASTER

  • @nikm5575
    @nikm5575 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    First panzer: *gets hit and set on fire*
    Same panzer: *drives away* "understandable have a great day"

    • @ScaleMilitaryModels
      @ScaleMilitaryModels 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nik M just cuz it’s destroyed, or the crews dead doesn’t mean it can’t drive

    • @nikm5575
      @nikm5575 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Never said it couldn't

  • @destroyeryt8166
    @destroyeryt8166 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I think that in real life the soldiers didn't miss so often, and they didn't drive straight into the enemy while shooting at the same time, they rather hid in the woods and behind the buildings

    • @atomica0914
      @atomica0914 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's just what you think, maybe the panzers couldn't penetrate it at long range? This was a tactic often used against heavily armoured enemies

    • @romeoroberts157
      @romeoroberts157 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@atomica0914 The longer barreled Panzer 4 had no problem penetrating the KV. only the ones with a short barrel

  • @mayo5713
    @mayo5713 4 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    The panzers had a range advantage, the Kv-1 had an armour advantage (able to absorb a direct hit from an 88mm). The panzers would have stayed in the treeline and fired from afar, also catching the 2 t34-85s from the side as they came back. From the range the panzers would have stayed at then the Kv-1 would have had a hard time penetrating them also. Although the longbarrel 75mm used by the panzers had a range and penetrating advantage, the frontal armour of the Kv-1 is just too thick but constant shelling from the panzers would probably have rendered the armour useless after a few direct hits thus causing the Kv-1 to be abandoned. Why do movies always make the germans leave cover and fire on the move? They knew they had the firepower and range advantage and always used that when possible.

    • @pinkyandbrain123
      @pinkyandbrain123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I am not sure that the 8-8 wouldn’t punch clean through. The 75 on the F2 models as well. The KV1 was good against 50mm from P-III and the short 75 from P-IV but I don’t think the later models had problems with penetrating a KV-1

    • @KiRiTO72987
      @KiRiTO72987 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Because while gurilla warfare is great tacticly speaking its not very entertaining to watch if tou arent somone who enjoyes tactics

    • @Stripedbottom
      @Stripedbottom 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Because in real life, what you always tried do was to find every possible loophole, use every weakness the enemy had, and always rig the game in your favour if you only could, trying to get as unfair an advantage as possible, in order for the other guy to die instead of you. When transferred to film, it always looks patently unheroic and uncool. So, the filmmakers (with a few exceptions, and those films usually end up being unpopular) don't transfer it to film, they transfer to film what most people think WW2 looked like, and what looks cool.
      Germans charging full ahead in menacingly looking tanks and firing on the move is a German-looking thing to do. Germans being just puffs of smoke and flashes in the treeline that destroy your stuff before you know what's happening looks cowardly and un-German. So...

    • @RobertWF42
      @RobertWF42 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or the Germans could have sent out two tanks to engage at range and outflank with the third.

    • @МамаПапов-у8у
      @МамаПапов-у8у 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ahaha. Do you know about Kolobanov's KV-1 ? Check it. How many hits it take. It will be surprise for you

  • @taserrr
    @taserrr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    This scene is almost as historically inaccurate as the on in Fury. Those Germans panzer IV's wouldn't come out of hiding... Especially not to engage a KV-1 in frontal fire combat. They're not children playing with toys...

    • @mrki412
      @mrki412 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      but, but skiiiillll4ltu, they are in game, bots...

    • @mrki412
      @mrki412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Zynthetic Nekki what's next, T-34 going 100km/h with double barrel guns?

    • @mrki412
      @mrki412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Zynthetic Nekki my name is from WoT account, if you want to buy it LOL...

    • @mrki412
      @mrki412 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Zynthetic Nekki th-cam.com/video/huYt8R0C6F8/w-d-xo.html Croatian cartoon from my childhood

    • @mr.laughington5740
      @mr.laughington5740 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Again, this is a movie, its all about action than realism. If the movie makers decided to put the real stuffs that happened then the movie is less thrilling and boring to watch because there is no action. Typical offended German tank fanboys...

  • @MrMcp1995
    @MrMcp1995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    KV: Fires a shot that doesn't land in the same time zone as any of the Panzers.
    Panzer commanders: That's our cue.

  • @SantaChannel.2022
    @SantaChannel.2022 ปีที่แล้ว

    I subscribed to your channel! from Japan

  • @MaximPace
    @MaximPace 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    If only the KV-1 in warthunder was that good, then maybe I’d actually use it

    • @luiv9651
      @luiv9651 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Damn

    • @derzwerg9167
      @derzwerg9167 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      True words :D
      Whats ur ingameName? xD

    • @MaximPace
      @MaximPace 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Der Zwerg HumorHolic

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      it is good what you on about. Angle at 45 degrees and watch the magic happen

    • @MaximPace
      @MaximPace 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      TheSnazzyComet I don’t know man, first KV is kinda shit, every round I get hit by penetrates and insta kills me, and my rounds don’t penetrate jack even when I hit the sweet spots

  • @marcosmedia7463
    @marcosmedia7463 3 ปีที่แล้ว +279

    When you look closely at the Panzers, their suspension wheels are large and there are 5 of them. They're also conveniently placed just like the soviet suspension wheels. This indicates that they either didn't try to edit the Panzers to look like real Panzers, or they used T-54's/T-55's and gave them makeup cause it was cheaper.

    • @luisjuliato2341
      @luisjuliato2341 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Finding real working WW2 tanks is already hard, even harder is to find german tanks, a replica is expensive and takes time. The only option is using T-44s and that's correct, those same "Panzers" have been used in many russian war movies.

    • @marengo6990
      @marengo6990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      To find a working panzer 4 today you would need a lot and a lot of money, time and luck. Adding in a museum letting you use one for a film is even more rare, and these are pretty nice mockups adding that the side skirts almost perfectly hide the suspension

    • @Stanier_Standard
      @Stanier_Standard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      And to be fair they do look very close to panzer IVs

    • @gheelman
      @gheelman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      They're actually T-54/55s.

    • @marcosmedia7463
      @marcosmedia7463 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gheelman my bad Xd

  • @blank557
    @blank557 4 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    Germans didn't need to driver closer to shoot at the KV. They had superior optics, and the 75Mm cannon on those Mark IV's could have easily hit the Soviets at long range.

    • @marekkolouch869
      @marekkolouch869 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      But those german tanks are not tigers, the thing you said is right, but only if those were tigers. In this case KV is way better then the panzers

    • @blank557
      @blank557 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@marekkolouch869 Tigers or not, German tanks had better crews, and better optics than the Soviets. They slaughtered Soviet tanks five to one or more. Even the humble Stug assault gun could pile up more kills than any other tank the Germans had. Now if the KVs and T34s were facing early war panzers armed with 37mms, sure, they would crush them like soda cans

    • @jantimmer5558
      @jantimmer5558 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@marekkolouch869 the longnbarreld 75 would punch right through the frontal kv1 armor.

    • @ULTRA_2112
      @ULTRA_2112 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@blank557: "Now if the KVs and T34s were facing early war panzers armed with 37mms, sure, they would crush them like soda cans"
      Now you´r on it!
      The germans had Panzer III on July 13th, 1942.
      pt-br.facebook.com/sovietmrs/posts/real-heroes-of-ww2-tankman-semyon-konovalov-tankman-semyon-konovalov-several-tim/1848600085158524/
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankers_(film)

    • @francescodallorso561
      @francescodallorso561 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ULTRA_2112 ok u know what type of tanks germany had in 1942..so the tanks in this shit movie are pz 3 switch 37mm guns? Are u on drugs??

  • @montanadad2223
    @montanadad2223 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hollywood movies always show turrets to be the size of a school bus on the inside. M60s, pretty roomy, M1A1 not so much. Armor for 23 years, still love the movies!

  • @yanpavlenko1098
    @yanpavlenko1098 2 ปีที่แล้ว +528

    The KV tanks were practically immune to the 3.7 cm KwK 36 and howitzer-like, short-barreled 7.5 cm KwK 37 guns mounted, respectively, on the early Panzer III and Panzer IV tanks fielded by the invading German forces. Until the Germans developed more effective guns, the KV-1 was invulnerable to almost any German weapon except the 8.8 cm Flak gun. (WIkipedia)

    • @tokarp390
      @tokarp390 2 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      on this scene are PZIVH tanks so good enough to destroy KV-1 .

    • @impguardwarhamer
      @impguardwarhamer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      @@tokarp390 Thats an error caused by the people who made the fake panzers for the film, the event this movie is based on was before any large scale deployment of Panzer F2's

    • @lorenzopalazzo2207
      @lorenzopalazzo2207 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Der KV-1 hat nicht mal Durchschlag bei einem Tiger

    • @Symphinitystug_III
      @Symphinitystug_III 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sh yes the Flak 88

    • @fiize681
      @fiize681 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@impguardwarhamer then they also made an mistake on T-34s because if the Panzer 4s were F2s then the KV1 shouldn't have T-34-85s at the start, 85s were introduced in late 43 to early 44, the Panzer 4h got already introduced in June 43, and even the F2s/Gs had a decent chance of going through the armor of the KV 1 dependent on range ofc but at 500m and less its more than likely that it would have gone through

  • @speakersound4565
    @speakersound4565 4 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    Then the germans did drove like this they were doing it wrong. German tank driver stopped before they fired... Also very subspect that they coulnt hit a kv1 in 700m. The Pzv III and IV had such good acc.... maybe based on a true story but still very lucky for the russians.

    • @fernandocardenazavala3547
      @fernandocardenazavala3547 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Kv 1 mejor que los Panzer

    • @jakartagamer6188
      @jakartagamer6188 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Or just some Russian bias(how the original ww2 crew tell these stories)

    • @yallgotcheez6285
      @yallgotcheez6285 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Inaccurate just like fury

    • @ДедаЧжун
      @ДедаЧжун 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Im Russian and this film is full bulshit.
      Better to see old film called "Javoronok"
      Worth it.

    • @bjornnylander8754
      @bjornnylander8754 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Its Russian propaganda ;)

  • @vladimirivkovic6030
    @vladimirivkovic6030 4 ปีที่แล้ว +239

    Total bull...t. Whoever wote the script has no clue how things were ....

    • @eduardgindin3763
      @eduardgindin3763 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Agreed. The Germans would never advance in such a close and vulnerable formation.

    • @vladimirivkovic6030
      @vladimirivkovic6030 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Dont won't to repeat what others commented, like breaking cover for no reason, having optics, 88 and the best front armour, 'stop and shoot', and radio comm. Russians didnt have radio in tanks what the.... ?!?

    • @kitpesec1536
      @kitpesec1536 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Everybody here are correct. Supremacy of rus tanks is a filthy propaganda

    • @raketny_hvost
      @raketny_hvost 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Most of cinema in 21 century is shit, relax

    • @fudgedog123
      @fudgedog123 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kitpesec1536 relax, it's only a film.

  • @mashavasiliuk3648
    @mashavasiliuk3648 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    КВ 1 прекрасно бронированый танк на тот момент он для немцев был большим сюрпризом . Посмотрите документальную хронику подвиг 1 танка Колобанова , там он один уничтожил целую колонну танков около 20 штук получил более 100 поподаний по кв 1 но броню не пробили.

  • @lukebasco3746
    @lukebasco3746 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    when your crew members trained only at 50%

  • @itz_niko2619
    @itz_niko2619 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    shell: scrapes the tank
    tank: *violently explodes*

  • @thebiggestoneg7823
    @thebiggestoneg7823 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Jesus Christ that kv-1 interior is as big as a living room lmao

  • @alexprokhorov407
    @alexprokhorov407 3 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    Actually, KV-1 is not a tank. It's an above-ground submarine.

    • @ИринаФомичева-б4п
      @ИринаФомичева-б4п 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Это как это? Сухопутная подводная лодка..Было такое кино"Подводная лодка в степях Украины." Думали,шутка..😁

    • @SRDPS2
      @SRDPS2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      * Overweight * Lmao