What I love about all your videos is the love for the birds, it's all about the bird. You don't really care about brands, but about which tools let you best capture the exact bird moments that you're looking for. Today the Sony systems are the more apt, but in the future it could be another brand.
Hi Mark, I am myself a convert from Nikon to Sony. However in term of action camera, I think that D850 vs A9 is not an apples to apples. For all its strength, D850 is not a pro action camera, that would be D5.
Greetings Mark. Glad to have introduced the A9 to you! Am now using the new A1 almost daily and exclusively for bird photography. Looking forward to comparing notes with you soon and another bird trip together soon. Let’s hope Sony will introduce a “pro capture”/“pre capture” feature to the A1 via a firmware update. It is an incredibly helpful feature for bird photographers which can found in some APSC and MFT cameras. Keep up the excellent work! Michael
I get it, shoot with what either makes you happy or helps you get the images you need. I'd personally never buy a Sony, nothing against Sony, they make wonderful products and lenses, sensors, etc. I'm just not a fan of the bodies as I am a flagship Canon/Nikon shooter since the F4s/F5 and D1-D6 now. So yes I'm old young (35) and I am set in my ways lol. I'll never leave Nikon because I am NOT an influencer or whatever you call this stuff. No, I am a full time photojournalist.
I've been shooting for well over 50 years. Back in the 1970's, I moved to a Minolta SLR system, then in the early 2000's to a DSLR (Canon). I switched to Sony A7 only because it was the only full frame camera I could then afford. Like Mark, the advantages of a mirrorless over a DSLR took time to be fully appreciated. There is no way I could ever go back to a SLR system. And for you Nikon (and Canon) users, they make excellent mirrorless systems too. Since glass it the most important and expensive part of our photography gear, remember that both Nikon and Canon are able to utilize their DSLR legacy lenses on their mirrorless camera bodies with adaptors.
started with a minolta srt-101 in the army in the 70's. stayed the road. probably would have left minolta/konica like you except work and family was more a priority than photography. retired now. seems like i'd been waiting for the A1 all my life. for wildlife, it's like you died and went to heaven. shoot it everyday.
Thank you Mark. You likely saved me a bunch of $$$ and time to take it to the next level. Your timing is perfect. I am about to purchase new equipment. I ordered you book the other day too. Looking forward to it in my hands. ~ your neighbor
Hey Mark, thanks for this. I'm a 4-decade pro shooter on one system but lately I've been losing confidence in some of my gear. Bought an older Sony APS-C and the new 18-50 zoom as a "backup" to bring on lifestyle shoots (and feeling a bit like a traitor) and now I can't get switching out of my head. I'm pretty sure this video just tipped me over the mirrorless edge. At the end of the day (or a long career) but with plenty of energy left who cares what the label is. Get the gear that works best, makes clients happy, and allows a full night's sleep. I'm about to flood the used market with a whole lot of gear and look forward to the new learning curve. Thanks a lot for helping me decide.
Shot with Nikon for 13 years. Moved on to Sony. I love the A9. No black out in the view finder and the stacked sensor which really helps with rolling shutter sold me. The fantastic auto focus is a bonus.
We'll have to see what happens, but a stacked sensor offers the most obvious path toward high-speed or global shutters. The layers in the stack allow parallel processing of many pixels at a time. Now that we are reaching fundamental limits in Moore's Law, parallelism is the most obvious way to go. However, the fact that Sony used stacked sensor technology only on the A9 and didn't really change the sensor much on the A9II made me concerned that even Sony was struggling with the high cost of the technology. The release of the A1 with a seriously upgraded stacked sensor was a real relief. It looks like Sony still thinks it can control costs on stacked sensors, at least for its high end cameras.
The a9 was my first camera after Nikon as well. It was transformational. I traded it in for an a7r iv and sort of regretted it. The a9 was so forgiving (cuz of lower mp), better high ISO performance, better af, no blackout etc. I ended up ordering a used a9 ii recently and I’m really stoked! Once you use a good e shutter, it’s really hard to use anything else after.
@Siddharth Sriram , your remarks are interesting but I am not certain how to translate them into decisions between cameras. All I can say is that many of us use A9s in nature photography where the scenes can involve high contrast lighting. I am not aware of any difficulties reported by frequent or professional users. If the dynamic range were "highly disappointing" then I guess I would expect some more complaints from actual users. In fact, many users rave about the A9's low-light high-ISO performance. Since the primary limitation in digital sensors is noise, I would expect less satisfaction if the dynamic range were "highly disappointing". I am also intrigued by your comment that the A9II has improved dynamic range. I keep looking for real indications that the A9 and the A9II sensors are different, but I can't find much. As for the AA filter, you are talking mostly about a small detail compared to the fact that the A9 has only a 24 megabyte sensor. If you.find an AA filter a "big no,no" then I would suggest that you want an A1 or other over/40 megapixel camera anyway. I took a gamble on the low pixel count and was so pleased that my backup camera is now a 12 megapixel A7sII. But, that's me. User needs vary.
@Siddharth Sriram , by all means stick with what you like. I will say that Mark Smith is an extremely careful and skilled birder. I'm just happy to learn from him and others. Again, thanks for your thoughtful input.
Likely that the Z9 could be very close addressing short comings Mark mentioned in this video to Sony's Pro cameras of A9 MK 1-3 and A1 but disagree with some what he says and do we really need to see another I switched from Brand X to Brand Y - it's a changing target in terms of Body FF & APS improvements on each generation; the lenses and eco systems are more important - Nikon has superb F and Z lenses, plus you can adapt rival lenses on the Z like the EF glass and Sony FE Glass (adaptor needs improvement though)
I'm trying to decide between Nikon Z8 vs Sony A7R5. All I've come across are specification videos or videos where the presenter is biased to the one they are pushing. No photographer I've seen has tested both and then explained why one is better than the other.
@@MarkSmithphotography ,, have to agree with Victor ! I told you that you’re the Anthony Bordaine of photography ! Love the monologue as much as I love the pics and helpful info ! Have a great day fellow Floridian !
@@MarkSmithphotography I do too and I am afraid I will have to wait as well, because I have so much invested in Nikon. But this is THE VERY LAST CHANCE Nikon is getting.
Except that you’ll be basically starting all over anyway since your lenses won’t work on the Z9 natively. But the menus will still make sense - so there’s that
@@russellwright9961 Yes dear, I know about adapters. You’re adding bulk and even though the FTZ adaptor gets high marks - some are complaining about a loss in auto focus performance.
Great feedback Mark. This is the answer I have been waiting for since my previous query on the same subject. This is really a simplistic and honest feedback.
Another great video. Excellent the way you promote the tool you use now without knocking the tools you used to use, keeping the door open for change with no hard feelings. Very good presentation of the rationale behind the choice.
Thanks for all your presentations. I've been following your site for more than a year. your approach is always positive, no matter what the subject or camera make or lenses. I also made the sift from Nikon to Sony about a year ago, but for other reasons no to be place on this public forum. With Sony I had to adapt to the back screen shooting. One of the privileges I find it much more applicable to someone like me and you wearing some classes. Keep the good work going, following you from South Africa -RSA.
Dammit Mark! How can I go back to my poverty Nikon D500 now? This is the best ad for Sony gear ever. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and process is such great detail - these decisions are so hard but more information makes it easier. Cheers buddy!
If you have nothing but endless cash!! Like insane money!! go be a Sony guy...If you wanna save some money still get amazing photos without the new technology your D500 will still hold its ground
I purchased the Sony A 6400 just to get started in the Sony line with a 55-210 kit lens. Wanted the A 6600 which has IBIS, but the cost difference made me just want to get a used A7RV for slightly more.
Absolutely stunning images mark. I’m ready to pull the trigger on a alpha 1. I know it will be overkill for me but I’m 57 worked all my life and this camera covers all genres of what I do. 👍🏻👍🏻
Yep, me too! Sold an A9 M1, an A7R4, and some less frequently used lenses to make it happen. LOVE , LOVE, LOVE the A1. I'm also the same age as you, and have (frankly) worked my tail off for years for the privilege! :-) I feel blessed! The A1 Definitely acts like a cross between an a9 and an A7R4, BUT it's focus is even better (quite a bit actually) and it's less noisy than the A7R4 at high ISO (I'd say by about one stop).
I experienced that with nikon dslrs. I have a Z7 now and honestly while it may be inferior to a sony of the same specs, it is amazing, mirrorless is great.
@@anthonyc1883 it's too bad you don't have a distant cousin named Alex... You would've found out all too well what one is... And why it took almost a full minute to dial out, either with or without operator assistance...
An eye opener for some fence sitters like me with 2 DSLR's and 13 F mount lenses. I haven't touched a Sony yet as I'm an amateur I need to either rent one and get some glass and acclimatize myself before I make the leap. Ideally, I think I'll get Nikon mirrorless Z6II use an FTZ adapter and be done with it as the glasses are already there, all I need is an adapter for the lenses to fit the Z mount. I can't afford to leap to a new ecosystem as I'm an amateur.
For out in the wild I, personally, wouldn't rely on a A1. For a trip to the swamps or a desert there would be no other choice for me than a tank like D6, Z9, 1DX or stuff like that. The A1 is way overpriced for what it actually is. It is in a price range of the real tanks but it actually is a (fantasticly) improved D850. No vertical grip, small battery, tilt screen and flimsy SD like storage (the D850 at least had a propper XQD card), high Pixel count. So if you need a improved, mirroreless D850 and money isn't a problem, go for it. You'll love it. If you need a improved D5/6... hell no! Wait for the Z9. If you have already invested in Sony heavily... sad times are ahead for you. You paid a bunch of money to the early adopter tax. Better cameras are in the pipe of Nikon an Canon. And they are 20 years ahead in experience how to make shooting smooth, easy and ergonomically good and what makes a camera longterm reliability.
@@TheRealLerad Z9 for sure will be a great product, but there is still a huge BUT. Nikon product-planning managment's decision to shift from F-mount to Z mount, which is the widest among all brands in full frame format and nearly as wide as medium format is, maybe at first glance seems clever, but IMHO is suicidal. It seems strategically clever, since it can accept lenses from all other systems through adaptors, so that customers from all other brands may easily move to Nikon's z-mount, but without letting at the same time their own customers "leak" towards other brands (how clever indeed!). Because customers who today invest to z-mount lenses cannot move anymore from Nikon to other brands, since this is physically imposible. F mount lenses can still be utilised in other brand's systems through adaptors, but Z mount lenses no, and never will be. They are useless in other systems. You cannot make an adaptor from such a wide mount as the z-mount and its wide footprint lenses to the far narrower mounts of other brands, and please corect me if I am wrong. Nikon users who today invest to z-mount lenses may be prooved trapped in a dead end, in the worst case scenario where Nikon supposedly closes for good, which I do not wish at all, since their lenses are of supreme quality and many thousands of people are making a living by working to Nikon to produce them. Unfortunatelly for Nikon's short-sighted management, common sense dictates that customers of such expensive products want to be free to move to other brands if something goes wrong, so I strongly believe that a so much wide z-mount, finally was not a strategically clever move, but a (another one) strategally suicidal decision of Nikon's product planning managment that may be proved fatal. Again, I wish to be proved wrong. Competition is good and we all need Nikon to be an alive part of it. But it is exactly competition that does not forgive to anyone such strategical mistakes.
@@TheRealLerad Have you even tried the A1? I've had my A9's/A1 in pooring rain with no problems. Mark has explained the advantages over DSLR that have to be experienced to understand. I've had a D4 among other high-end Nikons, they now seem like obsolete bloated noisy toys. I use the vertical grip for sports, events and portraits with more battery life. I have the option to remove the bulky grip to have a more portable light weight kit for hiking and/or travel. The z9 is a good option but still not at the performance of the A1 and way heavier and bulkier than A1.
@Scott Barnhill I've tried a A1 and a Z9. The A1 is a really good camera! But I'm going with the Z9 all day long. The weight doesn't bother me. The camera is glued to 800mm or 600mm glas anyway. So a light camera body is a bad thing for balance. And in every other point the Z9 is superior to the A1 (at least for my habits and usecase)
I do not shoot action, but several things made me move from DSLRs to mirrorless for good. One was IBIS, second was the silent shutter and third was the lack of annoying "this lens does not match well with that body and needs AF micro adjustments". And now, in 2021, I would say the lens selection is better too. The companies make for mirrorless cameras lenses we didn't know were possible.
Mark, so happy to hear you are making the switch because it confirms why I made the switch just today. From a Nikon D4s to the Sony a7rIV with a 200-600mm telephoto. Your videos were a big part of me making the switch. Thank You!
I finally made the decision to switch after the last video where Mark said that once he switched, he had little desire to use the Nikon gear. I remembered how I felt the same way when I switched from DX to FX. Patiently waiting on the used A9 and 24-70mm GM to arrive.
Excellent mate. I was an early adopter and bought into Sony with an A7r as soon as it was released in 2013. Coming from a 5DMKII (I'd shot Canon for 30 years), nothing had prepared me for the quality and dynamic range of the first images I downloaded from that camera. Shot a surf carnival on the east coast of Australia 2 weeks ago with my A7rIV and 100-400 + 1.4x. Stunning results, all in sharp focus and with 61mpx to play with, huge potential to crop.
I second your points about EVFs! I remember they used to be seen as a drawback since they were worse than OVFs, but now that the tech has caught up, they are such a huge advantage for mirrorless systems. Cheers, great video
I already haver a7IV and 200-600 and didnt really "need" to watch this. But watching other videos from you, I couldnt resist. Having a cup of coffee and sitting listening to your stories and your enthusiasm is so chilling and fun :) Awesome video man 👊
No one ever mentions image quality when comparing Sony to Nikon. It's all about going Mirrorless..Are the Sony images better? Also I've used the 500 PF since it came out and I get sharp birds in flight with it.
IQ is what I miss with Sony. Whatever I tried (A9, A7RIV, whatever Sony zoom or prime) I was not able to get the same IQ as on D850 or even Z7. Colors, contrast, saturation on Nikon is still better in my opinion. Can you get the same IQ with tweaking Sony images in post ? Yes. But you have it out of camera on Nikons. Just my 2 cents.
Without trying to bad mouth any other brands, I think it is truth that: 1) Sony A9, A9II and A1 with their stacked sensors are truly amazingly cameras. 2) Sony has created some amazing glass for their FE system.
You are absolutely right about that. It all comes down to personal preference and budget. By the end of this year the three major brands will all have a stunning wildlife camera at the market (at least two of them with a stacked sensor [sony, nikon]) and great glas. So it is up to everybody themselves to decide what brand can give them what they need. The performance differences will be minor in real world use.
Yes Sony has some amazing gear but for wildlife shooters that need a 600 f4 or 400 f2.8 Sony only has new lenses, there is no used market for those lenses yet and there won't be for many years to come. Canon and Nikon have a huge used market, especially Canon. So how will an average person be able to afford big Sony glass. They will be forced to use long slower lenses. The 100-400 and 200-600 are good lenses, so is the sigma 150-600 but they are not exotic glass or f4 and that makes all the difference.
@@wayneevans9364 true. That's where my point of budget comes in place. I don't care. I can afford the expensive glas. Still will stay with nikon and spend my money on the new Z mount 600mm f4 when it will be available. But budget and used market absolutely is a big point for Nikon and Canon.
@@wayneevans9364 ...Sony bodies work very well with Canon or Nikon glass on an AF adapter...probably at least as well as the Nikon or Canon dslr glass on their mirrorless bodies...if not better... so, if you already have an investment in dslr glass, you can probably continue to use it until you can find a used Sony lens to replace it.
@@crinosil I thought there were too many limitations with the AF adapters. But good point about adapting the lens to Nikon mirrorless bodies, that also has limitations. My point about Sony 600mm f4 lenses, they won't be on the used market in any number for at least 10 years I would think.
I wish Nikon had an acceptable offering in mirrorless for wildlife. And I am getting a little tired of waiting. I feel like the Nikon PF glass is light enough, but the Nikon cameras aren't on par. It is frustrating to know that in my limited opportunities to get out and shoot, I'm missing a lot of shots.
Exactly why I'm switching Freeman..................Nikon seems on track to always be about 2-3 years behind Sony. I know they'll eventually come up with gear that competes with Sony but it's always such a wait for them. I just got tired of it too as I'm not getting any younger.
Very similar story myself but I went from Canon to Sony. I was fully prepared to send the Sony back and pay the fee to restock it if I didn't like it but literally in 2 hours of seeing home much I could customize the camera and the image quality (A7R3) there was no going back. I kept my Canon gear but it was never getting used so in a few more months I solid but did adapt some of my telephotos to the Sony which worked but in time I opted for all native glass. Still very happy with my A7R3 but it's not an action camera, awaiting my A1 and I'm really looking forward to it.
Thanks so much for this decision-making process. I have been traveling the same road, just so frustrated with the D750 viewfinder! Purchased Nikon Z5 and Sony A6400. Love them both. Any thoughts on which I should get first the Sony 100-400mm or the 200-600mm? I have the Tamron 150-600mm I have used for 5 years and will use on the Z5 but not for fast-moving wildlife. Thanks again for sharing your process. Glass is also the reason I went with the Z5 and not a used 7ARV. I will upgrade in the future when I get a handle on the Sony system. So far so good.
Thank you for a great story and video Mark and welcome to the Sony family. I was at Kando 3.0 too, but have a chance to meet you. It was a great time and I had signed up for Kando 4.0 but of course it was cancelled. I made the switch from my beloved Canon's 10 years ago and have not looked back. And I've sold more than 50 of my photography friends on Sony as well. I'm waiting patiently for my A1 to arrive, but will enjoy it vicariously by looking at the stunning images you will be taking with your A1.
Hello Mark, Even though I'm not switching to another brand I think you're a great storyteller, love all your great stories you tell during your videos. All this said really love your bird photos too.
Hi Mark, very nice video. Thank you for your story and your amazing ohter video's. I just sold all my Nikon gear incl D850 and bought the A1 with the sony 135mm 1.8 and th sony 50mm 1.2.
Great video, Mark! Nikon and Canon had all the time in the world but they never delivered. They took their customers for granted. Sony snatched the game from right under their armpits! The only respite for them at this point in time is that Sony is way too unaffordable for a lot of us.
Thank you Mark. Been shooting a Nikon P 1000 for a little over a year and love it. However, it has a number of limitations that the super zoom can’t overcome. I’ve been following you for a while and you are helping me make a decision as I step up my Camera game and buy a new one. Keep on rockin!
how's the video quality of the P1000 at it's max 3000mm focal length? or what is the focal length that is really useful?. I am thinking of buying it to augment my sigma 150-600mm for static subjects
That’s clearly the hardest thing as an amateur photographer. I am also invested in Nikon glass and seeing as I don’t make a living from photography it’s hard to justify the expense. Thanks very much for you insight though Mark. Much appreciated.
There is no need to change system. Just be patient. Nikon is behind, that's true. But there will be a DSLM for wildlife soon. And you can use your old F Mount Glas. In my opinion it economically is the best to wait, save money and buy a Nikon Z9 ;-) this is a expansive camera. But don't cost you more than changing system.
@@TheRealLerad I am not going to change systems. I was just making a statement. I have a Z6_2 that is an amazing camera for what I do. I was thinking more along the lines of professional photographers who can afford to purchase and sway systems at will. That is certainly not me.
@@adammacsween3230 ya, sorry. I got carried away. This is a pretty emotional topic to me 😅😇 This wasn't against you or Sony and certainly not against Mark and his change to Sony.
@@adammacsween3230 Trust me, professional photographers are very slow to switch. Photography is not a high income profession in general (with some notable exceptions) and pro's invest in gear hoping to use it for a long time. It is frequently not easy for them to upgrade within the same system, let alone switch systems. I am still using the D5 / D500 combination from year ago, and while I am keen to upgrade and enjoy new technology, I am not in a hurry.
Hard to argue with results, Mark. Great video, and again, I appreciate your candor. One thing for everyone to remember is Nikon and Canon will eventually catch up to where Sony is today. But how much further ahead will Sony will be when they do? I think in a few more years Sony will add an "Auto" button so we can take a nap while the camera goes out and gets the shots for us. 😂
Canon's already caught up in everything but FPS and native lens selection. Nikon still has a long way to go. While I'm fully invested in Canon cameras, I've tried Sony, Nikon, Panasonic, and Olympus. Out of those, the Sony and the Olympus both gave me some menu system frustration (which is NOT a big deal, especially with Sony updating it's menus). The Panasonic I tried was so old it didn't even shoot video. Nikon was the most frustrating for me, as the focusing was not as great as advertised in my use case, and I just didn't like the feel. So I'm still very deep in Canon, but Sony has peaked my interest recently.
@@truckerzachbell "Canon's already caught up in everything but FPS" You need to look closer at Sony if your think that comment is correct. The Sony A1 moved the AF performance ahead again, Sony has better EVF over 9m dots, faster sync speed on EVF, better customization, zero shutter black out all the time on electronic shutter, 15 times faster data readout on A1 sensor compared to R5 (so almost zero rolling shutter), better DR on electronic shutter (Canon performs reasonably well on mechanical shutter but can lose 2 stops when switched to electronic shutter), faster flash sync speeds, flash sync on electronic shutter, better DR performance, R5 has one fast card slot and one slow, that means slower speeds when saving to both cards, the R5 can only record to one slot in 8K and it overheats quickly in 8K - neither are issues for the A1. And I could go on and on (I did not even mention 4K and 8K video superiority). Nikon now has access to the Sony A1 sensor, watch out Canon when the Z9 arrives.
@@michaelhains2291 you can bring up spec sheets all you want. But Sony still doesn't have Dual Pixel AF (though they DO have a decent hybrid AF system), the A1 just got 8K video (Canon R5 has had it for several months already, though overheating is still a problem with said R5), Canon and Nikon both use a bigger lens mount (The Canon R and Nikon Z mounts are 54mm wide as opposed to Sony E-mount's 47) which lets more light onto the sensor making some of the DR issues negligible, a flip out LCD screen (Sony A1 only tilts, doesn't rotate), Sony uses a proprietary memory card (Type A CF Express, similar to the old Sony Memory Sticks) and the Canon R5 is HALF the price of the A1, so if it fails or gets damaged, it's cheaper for me to replace. In addition, Sony didn't include a battery grip on a $6,500 body, whereas Canon and Nikon both do on their DSLRs and Olympus does on it's E-M1X (which costs half the price of the A1 due to it having half the sensor size and it's own issues caused by that and it's tiny Micro 4/3 mount). Another issue I have with the Sony a1 steak sauce camera: I haven't seen any Sony or any Nikon body (of course the lens would be destroyed in this situation), even at the $6,500 price point, be able to survive a direct impact from the horn of a Texas Longhorn 🐂 bull, whereas the Canon 1D X III DSLR easily does... And actual long term durability from materials such as Canon grade Unobtanium trumps sensor spec sheets and frames per second all the live long day the way I see it in my situation. I don't know if Sony can catch up to that spec, but we'll see what they have up their sleeves next year or perhaps on April Fool's Day. The a1 is an amazing body that's well worth it's price point for the right user. That user is not me. Sony is quite far ahead of Canon and Nikon on tech specs and in areas like DR and FPS. But they still need to catch up to Canon on certain other things that matter, like battery life (which they will soon), ergonomics (things like a flip out screen, button placement, and touch enabled menus), and durability (weather sealing, use of Unobtanium Alloy, etc...). Canon's EOS-1R will be here soon... and will not only solve the R5's issues, it'll be a beast all it's own that'll make the Sony a1 look like the $6,500 toy it is...
I warned you 3 years ago. When I got the A9 I felt like I was cheating. My wife dumped all he Nikon gear for Sony and now has an A1 on order. I will evaluate that, but I am not into video. I am interested in the specs for the A7RV.
Excellent video, thank you so much. I shot DSLR's for decades but eventually switched to Sony mirrorless and never regretted a moment of it. The A9 is a terrific camera and I've got lots of exceptional images from it. Looking forward to more of your great videos and still images.
Its funny my story is very similar. A little over 3 years ago I was shooting a Nikon D850 , and a D500 . I ran into this guy that had an A9 and 100-400 and was raving about it. He let me try it and I was blown away. I Sold my Nikon stuff and bought my first Sony the A7riii and 100-400. I remember all the photographers I knew when I showed with the Sony and told them I switched from the D850 and D500 laughed so hard and called me insane. I loved the system so much, a month later I added the A9, the A7r4 came after and now I am waiting on my A1 to arrive. BTW all those guys that laughed at me most of them are shooting Sony now lol 😂 I am thrilled with my decision. Thanks for sharing your story Mark !!!
@@njrtech I sold my A7r4 already might keep the A9 as a backup camera, that's if my A1 ever arrives still waiting on my preorder lol Being a Sony pro support member didn't help me much this time, this is the first time I didn't get a camera or lens on release day lol
Very helpful, I was originally looking to upgrade my Nikon body (D5300), then the Sony Alpha 1 dropped... I can't stretch to one of those but I'm trying to figure out which Sony body to go for..
Sadly Nikon's AF is lacking... but i am staying put. I have a lot invested in Nikon.. Mirrorless? i'll stick with my Leica Q twins. Of all the failed attempts with the Nikon compared to the Sony...Do you have any that we can see compared to the Sony?
Making the move myself, just got an A1 and a 50mm F1.2 to go with it and I’m blown away by fast lens and all the camera has to offer. Hanging to to my Nikon z7 II as a back up. I’m sure eventually I’ll get rid of it, hoping Sony comes out with a more affordable A1 type camera soon because I’m just loving shooting with the Sony. Great vid and your channel.
Dear Mark, thanks for the clear message in this video. Since i'm shooting Nikon and wildlife I really would like to know how the A1 performs with the 200-600mm. Will you do a review on that? Thanks in advance. Anton
I mirror your experience Mark, great video for those on the fence. I switched from Nikon D4, D500 and D800/810 to A7r2 to r3 then A9 9ii and now A1. I do sports, portraits landscapes and wildlife, stills and video. I was on a Colorado trip with my A1 and r4. Late in the trip I slipped and broke the rear screen of the A1. I had some sports jobs to do, my LCS loaned me an A1, after an event using the loaner, I tried to get by using the r4 and 9ii. I was so spoiled with the A1 as my main I ended up buying another A1 because the repair was taking too long. Now I have 2 A1's and they can do everything awesome.
I was fortunate enough to try literally every brand of mirrorless (excluding Canon, it was pre R5) prior to switching from DSLR. I had the budget for full frame so I eliminated fuji. The auto focus of Panasonic S1R and its pricing made it a no go. The Nikon z7 didn't work with my old Nikon glass(none of it was on the compatibility list) and the z7ii didn't present anything spec wise to encourage a second chance. I had used an A7R4 July 2020 on a shoot and loved it. I had two sigma ART primes I could convert over for a fee to E mount and at Christmas this past year I bought my A7R4 for 700 less than a Z7ii. As much as I will miss my Nikon gear, best decision ever.
Happy for you Mark .... well , I shoot hand in hand with Sony and Canon shooting every week end ... focus tracking is definitely improved in those versions ... I am ok to wait for another 1 year for Nikon to fix their focus tracking ... I enjoyed my image quality of Nikon over my friends... not to mention .. with my D850 , I pull better BOF , put in extra effort ... study your subject ... there is always ways to outcome the limits of your gear ... Enjoy shooting ... waiting for upcoming z400 f2.8 to upgrade
Mark, of all the many TH-cam channels that I frequent, you do not need to explain why you are switching, but I'd really be noting your reasons. I've a number of Sony shooter friends and I've heard their praises and seen their results. What Sony have accomplished these last couple of years is nothing short of amazing and they deserve to have someone like you to showcase what their equipment is capable of. This Nikon shooter will still be a subscriber of your channel.
I understand it all Mark, except the part on the 500pf lens. I own one and it is just amazing, especially for flight shots. It gave me a whole new experience because of the weight (just point shoot) and the results are fantastic.
Your experience mirrors mine with the aha moment of shooting silent mirrorless. During COVID lockdown I decided to pick up a photo blind for the back yard and notice being that close to birds the D500 was just too loud. Started using my z6 instead for silent shutter but going from the D500 to Z6 for wildlife wasn’t enjoyable. I said what the hell, I grabbed an a9 II and 200-600 in June and I think I’ve used my Nikon gear 2 or 3 times. Now when I’m out shooting and I’m around other photogs the sound of the mirror slapping is like nails on a chalkboard. Something about being out in nature and not disturbing the quiet makes it a more enjoyable experience. I still have my Nikon stuff... I have the 500pf (a great copy) that I love so I’m still in that “holding on stage” even though I’m not using it.
What a great story Mark, I was lucky that when I took up photography 3 years ago, a mate, who is a canon shooter advised my to go with Sony as the A7R2 had just come out & he told me it had amazing specs. 3 years later & I’ve accumulated 3 bodies & 12 lenses. It would make it extremely hard & expensive to switch systems now! So lucky I got the right advice in the beginning! 👍😀🙏👌Thankyou for your great story!
I was a long time Nikon user and switched to Olympus because my back was giving me problems. The smaller camera and lenses has made photography fun again. My journey was similar to yours, I rented a camera and lens for two weeks and then purchased a camera and a couple of lenses. It took some time to get used to the menus and button locations and when I needed to get the shot I would use my Nikon gear. Finally I put the Nikon gear away for 6 months and when I picked it up again I was not satisfied. Olympus has its limitations as do all the camera brands but for me it works.
Excellent presentation! I loved it. You're such a great story teller. Just curious why didn't you compare top Sony body with Nikon's like D5 or D6? D850 is second rate comparing to D5, D6.
Great detailed video Mark. I'm going to switch from Nikon (D7500 + 200-500) to Sony once the A7 IV comes out and will pair it with the Sony 200-600. I hopefully should have enough saved up for both!
you are better off getting a used A9 for not much higher price than the coming A7 IV. A7IV won't have stacked sensor, which is the magic juice of A9, enabling blackout free high speed shooting with minimal rolling shutter, A7IV can't match that for sure. People use A9 with electronic shutter almost all the time, so shutter count on a used A9 does not really matter.
Great story. I ave lived it in my own experience. Love the enthusiasm, and the photos. Initially I HATED the EVF until I switched back to DSLR. When I saw the power of the viewfinder i understood and switched to mirror less.
Mark ,pleaee advise and guide . I currently own a nikon d850 with Sigma 150 600 sports lens for aviation photography. I have an option to either buy Nikon 500pf 5.6 lens or Sony A1 with sony 200-600mm lens. Which shall be a good option for me for aviation photography (jets and helicopters)
Hi, i earlerly awaiting your first bird shots with the Sony alpha 1. Having said that i have an A7R4 and 200-600, would suggest i get an A1 and use the same lens or get a 600 F4 glass. Budget no bar but i can get only either 1 at a time.
I just went through the same decision. GM pros: slightly better IQ, less noise iff you can & want to shoot wide open, slightly faster AF, tack sharp at 600f4.0, takes TC1.4 very well. G zoom pros: smaller, significantly lighter, can zoom out where required, much cheaper, tack sharp at 600f6.3, takes TC1.4 ok-ish. So basically the GM has more weight, is less flexible and much more expensive but has some extra IQ. So I'm going for the A1 and keep my 200-600. I actually heard of someone selling his 600GM since his 200-600G on the A1 was good enough and lighter.
I have owned the RIV, and still own the 200-600 and 600 GM along with the Alpha 1. The 200-600 works great on the A1, pretty well with the 1.4X. The 600GM works extremely well with the 1.4X, enough to where I don't even want to take it off. 2x also works relatively well. If you don't wanna drop 13k the 200-600 will do but the 600 is something special.
@@daran0815 I am using my A1 with my 600mm F4 and love this combo. I have the 200 600mm G as well and I would never sell my 600mm F4 for the 200-600...But of course it's the more versatile lens but the image quality is not as good as on the big white...
@Daran from hell / @Hellcat, so basically its better to get A1 and use the 200-600 is what i can take from what you say. The major issue with A7RIV and 200-600 is the time it takes to focus, if you want to start tracking a bird especially in flight it seems like taking for ever to go from blur to getting everything in focus i have read and heard many people complain about the same problem, in fact i had the A7Riii before a couple of months and that was much better with this lens. No dount 200-600 is super value for money and help create great images after the legendary NIkkor 200-500 F5.6 ED this Sony seems to be the go to for wildlife especially birds. Surely i would also keep that lens but just debating with myself on weather I should add glass to the RiV or add another body to the 200-600.
It looks like my local camera shop owes you a commission check. I've been debating all winter if I should invest further in my nikon dslr, or jump to mirrorless now. This review pushed me over the edge. Traded in my nikon d500 and 200-500 and am now waiting for my A1 and 200-600mm. I'll be impatiently waiting for your A1 setup guide to get me started in the right direction again.
Right on the nitty gritty shift button. Superb images Mark, phew !! > means mastery of instruments and instincts you have 🪶 Look forward to those rare special moments and bonus Apidae too Whenever the buzzing moment transpires . (Nikon had me on the frustrated. fence for so long ~ my feeties are tingling sony talons for lift off !)
I've bit off all my nails as you've laid out why you've dumped your D850. I bought a D850 three years ago and am just getting to a good place with it. I've invested in some glass, three $1800 lenses and considering my big lens purchases and then I found this video. BLAH! Exciting but my stomach is a mess! I'm learning how to be a conservation photographer and I'm trying to gear up to make sure I can nail my shots. I don't think I couldn't have picked a more expensive profession! LOL! Thanks for your fun videos and for sharing your amazing photos and animal videos. You're truly gifted and a kind person.
Consider getting an A9 or A9II used if you can't afford the A1. We're kind of between models on the A9 series right now. I really had to laugh about the "tiny" 100-400mm f/4-5.6 lens. That's a much more capable lens than you might think.
@@stuartschaffner9744 The tiny !00-400 is one of thew best lens from sony , sometimes I use it for Macrophotography . I used to use Nikon . I switchewd to sony .I am very happy with that. Still I have Nikon D750, D850. Nikon Z6 which was a bad decision I made.
I know that once I have this A1 camera on my hands and able to fly to Florida. I will contact you for some lovely workshops. Keep up your wonderful work 😊
Sounds like a familiar story, although I've been riding the fence between Sony and Canon for the last 5 years or so. I haven't yet bought a large prime on the Sony side but have hedged my bets for a while longer picking up the EOS R5 to use with my 500mm F/4. For now I use both Sony and Canon side by side regularly, but if I go with one system on a shoot I will grab the Sony bag 90% of the time because I know I can get the shot.
When you mention the Ruggard bag, you can please note that the bag is designed by BH employees, and sold under the Ruggard brand, which is under the Gradus Group, which is also a BH, owned, company. Any Vello, Impact, Ruggard, and a couple more, on BH websight, are BH designed products.
Used Canon 1dx Mark ii and MRk iii plus Nikon D5 and D6 cameras in action,Sports and wildlife areas both in day and nighttime use. I tried the Sony A9 and what turned me off Sony was the crappy battery life in comparison to my Canon and Nikon cameras and the small size body and menu system wrecking my head especially for covering all day athletics,football, rugby,soccer events. Stay with my Canon and Nikon cameras as the Sony for me the overall robustness is not on par with either the 1dx or nikon d5,d6 cameras. I will try the Nikon z9
@@nrocha2466 I used the Sony A9 and its small size whilst wearing gloves I'm sub zero 🌡 and it's ergonomics we're off putting especially if you have large hands
@@NikCan66 you must have enormous hands. Lol. I've heard that one before from many Nikon fanboys. Your name tell us a lot about you... You must enjoy trolling Sony users. Too bad Nikon is in 3rd place these days...second to both Sony and Canon
@@nrocha2466 I use Canon and Nikon plus leica cameras for my work. I'm not a fanboy of any make. The ergonomic and actual robustness is fairly mediocre in Sony cameras against other makes plus resembles a game conse hand controller in build. Tried Sony A1 and A9 cameras for 3 months but just couldn't find it enjoyable.
Hi Mark I just started bird photography in May this year. I was able to buy 2nd hand nikon 200-500mm and a D500. Both seller seems to be glad they see me. I guess I know why. But even if I know how good the Sony A9 or A1 are, I still have to go with the D500 first as it is way cheaper. After short 5 months and about 500 Mb of raw pics later, I am also in a transition and the only hope I have with Nikon is the Z9. If it doesn't work I will probably switch to the A7R4 first.
Did you sell all you Nikon gear then? Assume you did to fund the Sony kit. Only just got a D500 myself after using a D7200 for wildlife. I agree Sony and mirrorless in general is the way to go and is the future, but a D500 makes sense for me cost-wise right now. Great video anyway Mark - thanks for sharing.
My father is about to make the switch to Sony as well from a D7200. He isnt getting an A1 though. He isnt sure if he wants the A7R III like I have or stick with 24mp and get either the A7 III or A9.
OK, the appropriate title for this video should really be "why I switched from DSLR to mirrorless". Now that Nikon has Z9 camera that's is better than Sony and, Nikon has just started to offer the Z 800 lens which appears amazing. We would really appreciate if you could review Z9 camera + Z800 lens combo, and let us know how it works. Thanks!
It seems that most features people love about the Sony cameras are the features inherent to any mirrorless system: smaller bodies, smaller lenses (less flange distance), true WYSIWYG in the EVF regarding exposure, no need for lens AF fine-tuning, no mirror so much higher FPS possible ... For wildlife photography, the eye-detection AF isn't there yet for any brand. Sony is the leader in the mirrorless segment (which will make DSLRs a thing of the past; just like DSLRs made SLRs obsolete) as they have been focused on it for multiple years by now. Canon caught up, Nikon ignored it for too long. As a Nikon shooter with the D500, I see little need to switch to mirrorless: the main reason for me would be the silent shutter as that would greatly help in photographing from a blind. But, when I compare the keeper rate that I get to the occasional mirrorless attempt, I see no difference. But then again, I rarely spend much time shooting small, erratic birds. What I definitely don't choose to do is to switch brands. Nikon is catching up. The Z6ii and Z7ii with the latest firmware are getting very close. The Z9 will get there (I hope). :-)
you make a good point. The mistake most people make is comparing a new model with the model they’re currently using. Best to compare the newest model of the brand they’re using
If it works for you then there is absolutely no reason to change gears which is a very expensive exercise. For me is more the attitude that Nikon had for many years to not wanting to improve or change things that has bothered me. Now they are playing catch up but it is too late imo. Sony with the A1 has made a camera that is hard to beat even for Sony as I can’t imagine why you would need or want more than that camera!
What a breath of fresh air - a camera hardware video driven by great photography and a love for the art and craft of photography.
What I love about all your videos is the love for the birds, it's all about the bird.
You don't really care about brands, but about which tools let you best capture the exact bird moments that you're looking for. Today the Sony systems are the more apt, but in the future it could be another brand.
Hi Mark, I am myself a convert from Nikon to Sony. However in term of action camera, I think that D850 vs A9 is not an apples to apples. For all its strength, D850 is not a pro action camera, that would be D5.
Good point! A9-D5, A7R3-D850. A7R3 better than D850 for action/bird.
@@traianmol I've used both, and the D850 does much, much better than the a7r III (and IV for that matter) for action shooting.
@@youknowwho9247 I own both camera, so...
@@traianmol Easy to use for the ones that don't want to struggle with the DSLR focus system. Not better.
really good point. DSLR vs mirrorless??? not Nikon vs Sony video.
Nice story. Thanks for sharing. Do you regret that now that the Z8 is out?
Greetings Mark. Glad to have introduced the A9 to you! Am now using the new A1 almost daily and exclusively for bird photography. Looking forward to comparing notes with you soon and another bird trip together soon. Let’s hope Sony will introduce a “pro capture”/“pre capture” feature to the A1 via a firmware update. It is an incredibly helpful feature for bird photographers which can found in some APSC and MFT cameras.
Keep up the excellent work!
Michael
Thanks and nice to hear from you!
I get it, shoot with what either makes you happy or helps you get the images you need. I'd personally never buy a Sony, nothing against Sony, they make wonderful products and lenses, sensors, etc. I'm just not a fan of the bodies as I am a flagship Canon/Nikon shooter since the F4s/F5 and D1-D6 now. So yes I'm old young (35) and I am set in my ways lol. I'll never leave Nikon because I am NOT an influencer or whatever you call this stuff. No, I am a full time photojournalist.
I've been shooting for well over 50 years. Back in the 1970's, I moved to a Minolta SLR system, then in the early 2000's to a DSLR (Canon). I switched to Sony A7 only because it was the only full frame camera I could then afford. Like Mark, the advantages of a mirrorless over a DSLR took time to be fully appreciated. There is no way I could ever go back to a SLR system. And for you Nikon (and Canon) users, they make excellent mirrorless systems too. Since glass it the most important and expensive part of our photography gear, remember that both Nikon and Canon are able to utilize their DSLR legacy lenses on their mirrorless camera bodies with adaptors.
started with a minolta srt-101 in the army in the 70's. stayed the road. probably would have left minolta/konica like you except work and family was more a priority than photography. retired now. seems like i'd been waiting for the A1 all my life. for wildlife, it's like you died and went to heaven. shoot it everyday.
Thank you Mark. You likely saved me a bunch of $$$ and time to take it to the next level. Your timing is perfect. I am about to purchase new equipment. I ordered you book the other day too. Looking forward to it in my hands. ~ your neighbor
Hey Mark, thanks for this. I'm a 4-decade pro shooter on one system but lately I've been losing confidence in some of my gear. Bought an older Sony APS-C and the new 18-50 zoom as a "backup" to bring on lifestyle shoots (and feeling a bit like a traitor) and now I can't get switching out of my head. I'm pretty sure this video just tipped me over the mirrorless edge. At the end of the day (or a long career) but with plenty of energy left who cares what the label is. Get the gear that works best, makes clients happy, and allows a full night's sleep. I'm about to flood the used market with a whole lot of gear and look forward to the new learning curve. Thanks a lot for helping me decide.
Shot with Nikon for 13 years. Moved on to Sony. I love the A9. No black out in the view finder and the stacked sensor which really helps with rolling shutter sold me. The fantastic auto focus is a bonus.
We'll have to see what happens, but a stacked sensor offers the most obvious path toward high-speed or global shutters. The layers in the stack allow parallel processing of many pixels at a time. Now that we are reaching fundamental limits in Moore's Law, parallelism is the most obvious way to go. However, the fact that Sony used stacked sensor technology only on the A9 and didn't really change the sensor much on the A9II made me concerned that even Sony was struggling with the high cost of the technology. The release of the A1 with a seriously upgraded stacked sensor was a real relief. It looks like Sony still thinks it can control costs on stacked sensors, at least for its high end cameras.
The a9 was my first camera after Nikon as well. It was transformational. I traded it in for an a7r iv and sort of regretted it. The a9 was so forgiving (cuz of lower mp), better high ISO performance, better af, no blackout etc. I ended up ordering a used a9 ii recently and I’m really stoked! Once you use a good e shutter, it’s really hard to use anything else after.
@Siddharth Sriram , your remarks are interesting but I am not certain how to translate them into decisions between cameras. All I can say is that many of us use A9s in nature photography where the scenes can involve high contrast lighting. I am not aware of any difficulties reported by frequent or professional users. If the dynamic range were "highly disappointing" then I guess I would expect some more complaints from actual users. In fact, many users rave about the A9's low-light high-ISO performance. Since the primary limitation in digital sensors is noise, I would expect less satisfaction if the dynamic range were "highly disappointing".
I am also intrigued by your comment that the A9II has improved dynamic range. I keep looking for real indications that the A9 and the A9II sensors are different, but I can't find much.
As for the AA filter, you are talking mostly about a small detail compared to the fact that the A9 has only a 24 megabyte sensor. If you.find an AA filter a "big no,no" then I would suggest that you want an A1 or other over/40 megapixel camera anyway. I took a gamble on the low pixel count and was so pleased that my backup camera is now a 12 megapixel A7sII. But, that's me. User needs vary.
@Siddharth Sriram , by all means stick with what you like. I will say that Mark Smith is an extremely careful and skilled birder. I'm just happy to learn from him and others. Again, thanks for your thoughtful input.
Likely that the Z9 could be very close addressing short comings Mark mentioned in this video to Sony's Pro cameras of A9 MK 1-3 and A1 but disagree with some what he says and do we really need to see another I switched from Brand X to Brand Y - it's a changing target in terms of Body FF & APS improvements on each generation; the lenses and eco systems are more important - Nikon has superb F and Z lenses, plus you can adapt rival lenses on the Z like the EF glass and Sony FE Glass (adaptor needs improvement though)
I'm trying to decide between Nikon Z8 vs Sony A7R5. All I've come across are specification videos or videos where the presenter is biased to the one they are pushing. No photographer I've seen has tested both and then explained why one is better than the other.
Mark, your storytelling convincing people more than the gear you may use.
People asked for this so I gave it to them
@@MarkSmithphotography ,, have to agree with Victor ! I told you that you’re the Anthony Bordaine of photography ! Love the monologue as much as I love the pics and helpful info ! Have a great day fellow Floridian !
@@plumshoejeff that is a huge compliment to me. Thank you so much.
I always enjoy your videos, which strike me as 100% honest, with no agenda other than sharing your experiences.
I'm hanging on to my D850 until I see the upcoming Z9. I'm optimistic.
I hope they nail it!
@@MarkSmithphotography I do too and I am afraid I will have to wait as well, because I have so much invested in Nikon. But this is THE VERY LAST CHANCE Nikon is getting.
Except that you’ll be basically starting all over anyway since your lenses won’t work on the Z9 natively. But the menus will still make sense - so there’s that
@@ziggy149 Ummmm, you do know about adapters, right?
@@russellwright9961 Yes dear, I know about adapters. You’re adding bulk and even though the FTZ adaptor gets high marks - some are complaining about a loss in auto focus performance.
95% of the video: Yes! Exactly my story with Sony!
Last 5%: Owww nonononono… I try to convince myself I don’t need A1 xd
You don’t 😀
Thank you Mark for the testimony of your transition. Will wait for your A1 result to make my move.
So far, it has exceeded my expectations.
Great feedback Mark. This is the answer I have been waiting for since my previous query on the same subject. This is really a simplistic and honest feedback.
Another great video. Excellent the way you promote the tool you use now without knocking the tools you used to use, keeping the door open for change with no hard feelings. Very good presentation of the rationale behind the choice.
Thanks for all your presentations. I've been following your site for more than a year. your approach is always positive, no matter what the subject or camera make or lenses. I also made the sift from Nikon to Sony about a year ago, but for other reasons no to be place on this public forum. With Sony I had to adapt to the back screen shooting. One of the privileges I find it much more applicable to someone like me and you wearing some classes. Keep the good work going, following you from South Africa -RSA.
Dammit Mark! How can I go back to my poverty Nikon D500 now? This is the best ad for Sony gear ever. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and process is such great detail - these decisions are so hard but more information makes it easier. Cheers buddy!
If you have nothing but endless cash!! Like insane money!! go be a Sony guy...If you wanna save some money still get amazing photos without the new technology your D500 will still hold its ground
@@facedown9754 Funny - that's what my wife said!
@@dinsdalephotography lol my wife said a hell of a lot more than that when I told her I wanted to change systems!
I purchased the Sony A 6400 just to get started in the Sony line with a 55-210 kit lens. Wanted the A 6600 which has IBIS, but the cost difference made me just want to get a used A7RV for slightly more.
@@keoni37 I wouldn't dare to suggest upgrading from my D500..... (which I do like).
Absolutely stunning images mark. I’m ready to pull the trigger on a alpha 1. I know it will be overkill for me but I’m 57 worked all my life and this camera covers all genres of what I do. 👍🏻👍🏻
David, you only live once. Time to treat yourself some nicer stuff.😁
Do it, you won't regret - yes a little overkill but it does pretty much everything - I love it
If I pulled the trigger on that my missus would pull a trigger of a different kind on me....😳🤣🤣
Yep, me too! Sold an A9 M1, an A7R4, and some less frequently used lenses to make it happen. LOVE , LOVE, LOVE the A1. I'm also the same age as you, and have (frankly) worked my tail off for years for the privilege! :-) I feel blessed! The A1 Definitely acts like a cross between an a9 and an A7R4, BUT it's focus is even better (quite a bit actually) and it's less noisy than the A7R4 at high ISO (I'd say by about one stop).
I am in the same boat at 61. A1 here I come.
I experienced that with nikon dslrs. I have a Z7 now and honestly while it may be inferior to a sony of the same specs, it is amazing, mirrorless is great.
after experiencing a no-blackout viewfinder, going back to a camera with blackouts, it's like dialing a number with a rotary phone
Yes!
What is this "rotary phone" device that you speak of? ;-)
@@anthonyc1883 it's too bad you don't have a distant cousin named Alex... You would've found out all too well what one is... And why it took almost a full minute to dial out, either with or without operator assistance...
@@truckerzachbell It was with tongue planted firmly in cheek and a wink of sarcasm that I posted that comment. I remember all too well.
@@anthonyc1883 I get your sarcasm, but seriously... Having a distant relative who invented such a device is downright crazy...
An eye opener for some fence sitters like me with 2 DSLR's and 13 F mount lenses. I haven't touched a Sony yet as I'm an amateur I need to either rent one and get some glass and acclimatize myself before I make the leap. Ideally, I think I'll get Nikon mirrorless Z6II use an FTZ adapter and be done with it as the glasses are already there, all I need is an adapter for the lenses to fit the Z mount. I can't afford to leap to a new ecosystem as I'm an amateur.
Of all people, you deserve an a1 and the 600/4 lens. By your skill as a photographer, explorer and nature aficionado! Good job, on all fronts!
Thanks
For out in the wild I, personally, wouldn't rely on a A1. For a trip to the swamps or a desert there would be no other choice for me than a tank like D6, Z9, 1DX or stuff like that.
The A1 is way overpriced for what it actually is. It is in a price range of the real tanks but it actually is a (fantasticly) improved D850.
No vertical grip, small battery, tilt screen and flimsy SD like storage (the D850 at least had a propper XQD card), high Pixel count.
So if you need a improved, mirroreless D850 and money isn't a problem, go for it. You'll love it.
If you need a improved D5/6... hell no! Wait for the Z9.
If you have already invested in Sony heavily... sad times are ahead for you.
You paid a bunch of money to the early adopter tax.
Better cameras are in the pipe of Nikon an Canon. And they are 20 years ahead in experience how to make shooting smooth, easy and ergonomically good and what makes a camera longterm reliability.
@@TheRealLerad Z9 for sure will be a great product, but there is still a huge BUT. Nikon product-planning managment's decision to shift from F-mount to Z mount, which is the widest among all brands in full frame format and nearly as wide as medium format is, maybe at first glance seems clever, but IMHO is suicidal. It seems strategically clever, since it can accept lenses from all other systems through adaptors, so that customers from all other brands may easily move to Nikon's z-mount, but without letting at the same time their own customers "leak" towards other brands (how clever indeed!). Because customers who today invest to z-mount lenses cannot move anymore from Nikon to other brands, since this is physically imposible. F mount lenses can still be utilised in other brand's systems through adaptors, but Z mount lenses no, and never will be. They are useless in other systems. You cannot make an adaptor from such a wide mount as the z-mount and its wide footprint lenses to the far narrower mounts of other brands, and please corect me if I am wrong. Nikon users who today invest to z-mount lenses may be prooved trapped in a dead end, in the worst case scenario where Nikon supposedly closes for good, which I do not wish at all, since their lenses are of supreme quality and many thousands of people are making a living by working to Nikon to produce them. Unfortunatelly for Nikon's short-sighted management, common sense dictates that customers of such expensive products want to be free to move to other brands if something goes wrong, so I strongly believe that a so much wide z-mount, finally was not a strategically clever move, but a (another one) strategally suicidal decision of Nikon's product planning managment that may be proved fatal. Again, I wish to be proved wrong. Competition is good and we all need Nikon to be an alive part of it. But it is exactly competition that does not forgive to anyone such strategical mistakes.
@@TheRealLerad Have you even tried the A1? I've had my A9's/A1 in pooring rain with no problems. Mark has explained the advantages over DSLR that have to be experienced to understand. I've had a D4 among other high-end Nikons, they now seem like obsolete bloated noisy toys. I use the vertical grip for sports, events and portraits with more battery life. I have the option to remove the bulky grip to have a more portable light weight kit for hiking and/or travel. The z9 is a good option but still not at the performance of the A1 and way heavier and bulkier than A1.
@Scott Barnhill I've tried a A1 and a Z9. The A1 is a really good camera! But I'm going with the Z9 all day long. The weight doesn't bother me. The camera is glued to 800mm or 600mm glas anyway. So a light camera body is a bad thing for balance.
And in every other point the Z9 is superior to the A1 (at least for my habits and usecase)
I do not shoot action, but several things made me move from DSLRs to mirrorless for good. One was IBIS, second was the silent shutter and third was the lack of annoying "this lens does not match well with that body and needs AF micro adjustments". And now, in 2021, I would say the lens selection is better too. The companies make for mirrorless cameras lenses we didn't know were possible.
Mark, so happy to hear you are making the switch because it confirms why I made the switch just today. From a Nikon D4s to the Sony a7rIV with a 200-600mm telephoto. Your videos were a big part of me making the switch. Thank You!
I finally made the decision to switch after the last video where Mark said that once he switched, he had little desire to use the Nikon gear. I remembered how I felt the same way when I switched from DX to FX. Patiently waiting on the used A9 and 24-70mm GM to arrive.
Excellent mate. I was an early adopter and bought into Sony with an A7r as soon as it was released in 2013. Coming from a 5DMKII (I'd shot Canon for 30 years), nothing had prepared me for the quality and dynamic range of the first images I downloaded from that camera. Shot a surf carnival on the east coast of Australia 2 weeks ago with my A7rIV and 100-400 + 1.4x. Stunning results, all in sharp focus and with 61mpx to play with, huge potential to crop.
I second your points about EVFs! I remember they used to be seen as a drawback since they were worse than OVFs, but now that the tech has caught up, they are such a huge advantage for mirrorless systems. Cheers, great video
I already haver a7IV and 200-600 and didnt really "need" to watch this. But watching other videos from you, I couldnt resist. Having a cup of coffee and sitting listening to your stories and your enthusiasm is so chilling and fun :)
Awesome video man 👊
Thank you!
Thanks for your perspective, it amazing how photography gear is evolving, who knows what is next.
No one ever mentions image quality when comparing Sony to Nikon. It's all about going Mirrorless..Are the Sony images better? Also I've used the 500 PF since it came out and I get sharp birds in flight with it.
Yes
IQ is what I miss with Sony. Whatever I tried (A9, A7RIV, whatever Sony zoom or prime) I was not able to get the same IQ as on D850 or even Z7. Colors, contrast, saturation on Nikon is still better in my opinion. Can you get the same IQ with tweaking Sony images in post ? Yes. But you have it out of camera on Nikons. Just my 2 cents.
My photography is Railway and Landscape based and as far as image quality goes I will be staying with Nikon.
Without trying to bad mouth any other brands, I think it is truth that: 1) Sony A9, A9II and A1 with their stacked sensors are truly amazingly cameras. 2) Sony has created some amazing glass for their FE system.
You are absolutely right about that.
It all comes down to personal preference and budget.
By the end of this year the three major brands will all have a stunning wildlife camera at the market (at least two of them with a stacked sensor [sony, nikon]) and great glas.
So it is up to everybody themselves to decide what brand can give them what they need. The performance differences will be minor in real world use.
Yes Sony has some amazing gear but for wildlife shooters that need a 600 f4 or 400 f2.8 Sony only has new lenses, there is no used market for those lenses yet and there won't be for many years to come. Canon and Nikon have a huge used market, especially Canon. So how will an average person be able to afford big Sony glass. They will be forced to use long slower lenses. The 100-400 and 200-600 are good lenses, so is the sigma 150-600 but they are not exotic glass or f4 and that makes all the difference.
@@wayneevans9364 true. That's where my point of budget comes in place.
I don't care. I can afford the expensive glas. Still will stay with nikon and spend my money on the new Z mount 600mm f4 when it will be available.
But budget and used market absolutely is a big point for Nikon and Canon.
@@wayneevans9364 ...Sony bodies work very well with Canon or Nikon glass on an AF adapter...probably at least as well as the Nikon or Canon dslr glass on their mirrorless bodies...if not better... so, if you already have an investment in dslr glass, you can probably continue to use it until you can find a used Sony lens to replace it.
@@crinosil I thought there were too many limitations with the AF adapters. But good point about adapting the lens to Nikon mirrorless bodies, that also has limitations. My point about Sony 600mm f4 lenses, they won't be on the used market in any number for at least 10 years I would think.
Great story thanks. I just recently bought my a1 and it is mind blowing as going into another level for both photography and videography world.
I wish Nikon had an acceptable offering in mirrorless for wildlife. And I am getting a little tired of waiting. I feel like the Nikon PF glass is light enough, but the Nikon cameras aren't on par. It is frustrating to know that in my limited opportunities to get out and shoot, I'm missing a lot of shots.
Exactly why I'm switching Freeman..................Nikon seems on track to always be about 2-3 years behind Sony. I know they'll eventually come up with gear that competes with Sony but it's always such a wait for them. I just got tired of it too as I'm not getting any younger.
This is an excellent video, full of info, I am a Sony guy starting with a900 full frame now A7Riv . You take the best pictures.
Very similar story myself but I went from Canon to Sony. I was fully prepared to send the Sony back and pay the fee to restock it if I didn't like it but literally in 2 hours of seeing home much I could customize the camera and the image quality (A7R3) there was no going back. I kept my Canon gear but it was never getting used so in a few more months I solid but did adapt some of my telephotos to the Sony which worked but in time I opted for all native glass. Still very happy with my A7R3 but it's not an action camera, awaiting my A1 and I'm really looking forward to it.
wonderful images of my favorite Raptor also! Thank You!
Thanks so much for this decision-making process. I have been traveling the same road, just so frustrated with the D750 viewfinder! Purchased Nikon Z5 and Sony A6400. Love them both. Any thoughts on which I should get first the Sony 100-400mm or the 200-600mm? I have the Tamron 150-600mm I have used for 5 years and will use on the Z5 but not for fast-moving wildlife. Thanks again for sharing your process. Glass is also the reason I went with the Z5 and not a used 7ARV. I will upgrade in the future when I get a handle on the Sony system. So far so good.
Thank you for a great story and video Mark and welcome to the Sony family. I was at Kando 3.0 too, but have a chance to meet you. It was a great time and I had signed up for Kando 4.0 but of course it was cancelled. I made the switch from my beloved Canon's 10 years ago and have not looked back. And I've sold more than 50 of my photography friends on Sony as well. I'm waiting patiently for my A1 to arrive, but will enjoy it vicariously by looking at the stunning images you will be taking with your A1.
Thanks! I’m looking forward to Kando too!
I switched from the D750 to the a9. It's really a different experience altogether.
How’s the experience now? I also have a D750 and I’d like to go into a nikon mirrorless but I know the Sonys perform better.
great video Mark. Just went Sony from Canon and made the jump wholesale. No regrets, loving the new gear.
Hello Mark,
Even though I'm not switching to another brand I think you're a great storyteller, love all your great stories you tell during your videos.
All this said really love your bird photos too.
Hi Mark, very nice video. Thank you for your story and your amazing ohter video's.
I just sold all my Nikon gear incl D850 and bought the A1 with the sony 135mm 1.8 and th sony 50mm 1.2.
Great video, Mark!
Nikon and Canon had all the time in the world but they never delivered. They took their customers for granted. Sony snatched the game from right under their armpits! The only respite for them at this point in time is that Sony is way too unaffordable for a lot of us.
Thank you Mark. Been shooting a Nikon P 1000 for a little over a year and love it. However, it has a number of limitations that the super zoom can’t overcome. I’ve been following you for a while and you are helping me make a decision as I step up my Camera game and buy a new one. Keep on rockin!
how's the video quality of the P1000 at it's max 3000mm focal length? or what is the focal length that is really useful?. I am thinking of buying it to augment my sigma 150-600mm for static subjects
That’s clearly the hardest thing as an amateur photographer. I am also invested in Nikon glass and seeing as I don’t make a living from photography it’s hard to justify the expense. Thanks very much for you insight though Mark. Much appreciated.
There is no need to change system.
Just be patient. Nikon is behind, that's true. But there will be a DSLM for wildlife soon. And you can use your old F Mount Glas.
In my opinion it economically is the best to wait, save money and buy a Nikon Z9 ;-) this is a expansive camera. But don't cost you more than changing system.
@@TheRealLerad I am not going to change systems. I was just making a statement. I have a Z6_2 that is an amazing camera for what I do. I was thinking more along the lines of professional photographers who can afford to purchase and sway systems at will. That is certainly not me.
@@adammacsween3230 ya, sorry. I got carried away. This is a pretty emotional topic to me 😅😇
This wasn't against you or Sony and certainly not against Mark and his change to Sony.
@@adammacsween3230 Trust me, professional photographers are very slow to switch. Photography is not a high income profession in general (with some notable exceptions) and pro's invest in gear hoping to use it for a long time. It is frequently not easy for them to upgrade within the same system, let alone switch systems. I am still using the D5 / D500 combination from year ago, and while I am keen to upgrade and enjoy new technology, I am not in a hurry.
You are the best photographer in the milky way
Great video Mark. I remember talking to you at Kando 3.0, such a great time!
Whenever you can get to it - please do a video on how you have setup youe a1. Like the one you did for the a7r4
Hard to argue with results, Mark. Great video, and again, I appreciate your candor.
One thing for everyone to remember is Nikon and Canon will eventually catch up to where Sony is today. But how much further ahead will Sony will be when they do? I think in a few more years Sony will add an "Auto" button so we can take a nap while the camera goes out and gets the shots for us. 😂
Canon's already caught up in everything but FPS and native lens selection. Nikon still has a long way to go.
While I'm fully invested in Canon cameras, I've tried Sony, Nikon, Panasonic, and Olympus. Out of those, the Sony and the Olympus both gave me some menu system frustration (which is NOT a big deal, especially with Sony updating it's menus). The Panasonic I tried was so old it didn't even shoot video. Nikon was the most frustrating for me, as the focusing was not as great as advertised in my use case, and I just didn't like the feel.
So I'm still very deep in Canon, but Sony has peaked my interest recently.
@@truckerzachbell “peaked” my interest
@@pattiesalon sorry I used the wrong word...
@@truckerzachbell "Canon's already caught up in everything but FPS" You need to look closer at Sony if your think that comment is correct. The Sony A1 moved the AF performance ahead again, Sony has better EVF over 9m dots, faster sync speed on EVF, better customization, zero shutter black out all the time on electronic shutter, 15 times faster data readout on A1 sensor compared to R5 (so almost zero rolling shutter), better DR on electronic shutter (Canon performs reasonably well on mechanical shutter but can lose 2 stops when switched to electronic shutter), faster flash sync speeds, flash sync on electronic shutter, better DR performance, R5 has one fast card slot and one slow, that means slower speeds when saving to both cards, the R5 can only record to one slot in 8K and it overheats quickly in 8K - neither are issues for the A1. And I could go on and on (I did not even mention 4K and 8K video superiority). Nikon now has access to the Sony A1 sensor, watch out Canon when the Z9 arrives.
@@michaelhains2291 you can bring up spec sheets all you want. But Sony still doesn't have Dual Pixel AF (though they DO have a decent hybrid AF system), the A1 just got 8K video (Canon R5 has had it for several months already, though overheating is still a problem with said R5), Canon and Nikon both use a bigger lens mount (The Canon R and Nikon Z mounts are 54mm wide as opposed to Sony E-mount's 47) which lets more light onto the sensor making some of the DR issues negligible, a flip out LCD screen (Sony A1 only tilts, doesn't rotate), Sony uses a proprietary memory card (Type A CF Express, similar to the old Sony Memory Sticks) and the Canon R5 is HALF the price of the A1, so if it fails or gets damaged, it's cheaper for me to replace.
In addition, Sony didn't include a battery grip on a $6,500 body, whereas Canon and Nikon both do on their DSLRs and Olympus does on it's E-M1X (which costs half the price of the A1 due to it having half the sensor size and it's own issues caused by that and it's tiny Micro 4/3 mount).
Another issue I have with the Sony a1 steak sauce camera: I haven't seen any Sony or any Nikon body (of course the lens would be destroyed in this situation), even at the $6,500 price point, be able to survive a direct impact from the horn of a Texas Longhorn 🐂 bull, whereas the Canon 1D X III DSLR easily does... And actual long term durability from materials such as Canon grade Unobtanium trumps sensor spec sheets and frames per second all the live long day the way I see it in my situation. I don't know if Sony can catch up to that spec, but we'll see what they have up their sleeves next year or perhaps on April Fool's Day.
The a1 is an amazing body that's well worth it's price point for the right user. That user is not me. Sony is quite far ahead of Canon and Nikon on tech specs and in areas like DR and FPS. But they still need to catch up to Canon on certain other things that matter, like battery life (which they will soon), ergonomics (things like a flip out screen, button placement, and touch enabled menus), and durability (weather sealing, use of Unobtanium Alloy, etc...).
Canon's EOS-1R will be here soon... and will not only solve the R5's issues, it'll be a beast all it's own that'll make the Sony a1 look like the $6,500 toy it is...
How does battery life compare? I loved the D500 because it can shoot all day without a spare.
Very close to the same.
I warned you 3 years ago. When I got the A9 I felt like I was cheating. My wife dumped all he Nikon gear for Sony and now has an A1 on order. I will evaluate that, but I am not into video. I am interested in the specs for the A7RV.
The a1 is ridiculously good!
Excellent video, thank you so much. I shot DSLR's for decades but eventually switched to Sony mirrorless and never regretted a moment of it. The A9 is a terrific camera and I've got lots of exceptional images from it. Looking forward to more of your great videos and still images.
Its funny my story is very similar. A little over 3 years ago I was shooting a Nikon D850 , and a D500 . I ran into this guy that had an A9 and 100-400 and was raving about it. He let me try it and I was blown away. I Sold my Nikon stuff and bought my first Sony the A7riii and 100-400. I remember all the photographers I knew when I showed with the Sony and told them I switched from the D850 and D500 laughed so hard and called me insane. I loved the system so much, a month later I added the A9, the A7r4 came after and now I am waiting on my A1 to arrive. BTW all those guys that laughed at me most of them are shooting Sony now lol 😂 I am thrilled with my decision. Thanks for sharing your story Mark !!!
@@njrtech I sold my A7r4 already might keep the A9 as a backup camera, that's if my A1 ever arrives still waiting on my preorder lol Being a Sony pro support member didn't help me much this time, this is the first time I didn't get a camera or lens on release day lol
Very helpful, I was originally looking to upgrade my Nikon body (D5300), then the Sony Alpha 1 dropped... I can't stretch to one of those but I'm trying to figure out which Sony body to go for..
Sadly Nikon's AF is lacking... but i am staying put. I have a lot invested in Nikon.. Mirrorless? i'll stick with my Leica Q twins.
Of all the failed attempts with the Nikon compared to the Sony...Do you have any that we can see compared to the Sony?
Making the move myself, just got an A1 and a 50mm F1.2 to go with it and I’m blown away by fast lens and all the camera has to offer. Hanging to to my Nikon z7 II as a back up. I’m sure eventually I’ll get rid of it, hoping Sony comes out with a more affordable A1 type camera soon because I’m just loving shooting with the Sony. Great vid and your channel.
Dear Mark, thanks for the clear message in this video. Since i'm shooting Nikon and wildlife I really would like to know how the A1 performs with the 200-600mm. Will you do a review on that? Thanks in advance. Anton
Yes and so far it has Performed miraculously!
I mirror your experience Mark, great video for those on the fence. I switched from Nikon D4, D500 and D800/810 to A7r2 to r3 then A9 9ii and now A1. I do sports, portraits landscapes and wildlife, stills and video. I was on a Colorado trip with my A1 and r4. Late in the trip I slipped and broke the rear screen of the A1. I had some sports jobs to do, my LCS loaned me an A1, after an event using the loaner, I tried to get by using the r4 and 9ii. I was so spoiled with the A1 as my main I ended up buying another A1 because the repair was taking too long. Now I have 2 A1's and they can do everything awesome.
I was fortunate enough to try literally every brand of mirrorless (excluding Canon, it was pre R5) prior to switching from DSLR.
I had the budget for full frame so I eliminated fuji.
The auto focus of Panasonic S1R and its pricing made it a no go.
The Nikon z7 didn't work with my old Nikon glass(none of it was on the compatibility list) and the z7ii didn't present anything spec wise to encourage a second chance.
I had used an A7R4 July 2020 on a shoot and loved it. I had two sigma ART primes I could convert over for a fee to E mount and at Christmas this past year I bought my A7R4 for 700 less than a Z7ii. As much as I will miss my Nikon gear, best decision ever.
Excellent review Mark, thanks for all of the effort you put into this video.
Happy for you Mark .... well , I shoot hand in hand with Sony and Canon shooting every week end ... focus tracking is definitely improved in those versions ... I am ok to wait for another 1 year for Nikon to fix their focus tracking ... I enjoyed my image quality of Nikon over my friends... not to mention .. with my D850 , I pull better BOF , put in extra effort ... study your subject ... there is always ways to outcome the limits of your gear ... Enjoy shooting ... waiting for upcoming z400 f2.8 to upgrade
Mark, of all the many TH-cam channels that I frequent, you do not need to explain why you are switching, but I'd really be noting your reasons. I've a number of Sony shooter friends and I've heard their praises and seen their results. What Sony have accomplished these last couple of years is nothing short of amazing and they deserve to have someone like you to showcase what their equipment is capable of. This Nikon shooter will still be a subscriber of your channel.
Thank you very much!
And 95% of what is in the a1, they will put into the a7IV! No other manufacturer does that:-)
4K 60 and 45MP
For 2499$
Kill the R6
@@maortheyoungcameraguy175 Thag will kill both Sony A1 and A7R4.
I understand it all Mark, except the part on the 500pf lens. I own one and it is just amazing, especially for flight shots. It gave me a whole new experience because of the weight (just point shoot) and the results are fantastic.
Your experience mirrors mine with the aha moment of shooting silent mirrorless. During COVID lockdown I decided to pick up a photo blind for the back yard and notice being that close to birds the D500 was just too loud. Started using my z6 instead for silent shutter but going from the D500 to Z6 for wildlife wasn’t enjoyable. I said what the hell, I grabbed an a9 II and 200-600 in June and I think I’ve used my Nikon gear 2 or 3 times. Now when I’m out shooting and I’m around other photogs the sound of the mirror slapping is like nails on a chalkboard. Something about being out in nature and not disturbing the quiet makes it a more enjoyable experience. I still have my Nikon stuff... I have the 500pf (a great copy) that I love so I’m still in that “holding on stage” even though I’m not using it.
One of my most favorite videos you've done. Thanks for sharing.
What a great story Mark, I was lucky that when I took up photography 3 years ago, a mate, who is a canon shooter advised my to go with Sony as the A7R2 had just come out & he told me it had amazing specs. 3 years later & I’ve accumulated 3 bodies & 12 lenses. It would make it extremely hard & expensive to switch systems now! So lucky I got the right advice in the beginning! 👍😀🙏👌Thankyou for your great story!
I use Sony A9 and Sony 200-600mm.f.45.6-6.3 and I love the pictures I get with this combination ....
@@jerryinsc No I have never had any problems Sony A9 and the autofocus with any of my Sony lenses and here among others also Sony 200-600mm.. .....
I was a long time Nikon user and switched to Olympus because my back was giving me problems. The smaller camera and lenses has made photography fun again. My journey was similar to yours, I rented a camera and lens for two weeks and then purchased a camera and a couple of lenses. It took some time to get used to the menus and button locations and when I needed to get the shot I would use my Nikon gear. Finally I put the Nikon gear away for 6 months and when I picked it up again I was not satisfied. Olympus has its limitations as do all the camera brands but for me it works.
Just Watched this wire-to-wire and it was great. Thanks for sharing
Excellent presentation! I loved it. You're such a great story teller. Just curious why didn't you compare top Sony body with Nikon's like D5 or D6? D850 is second rate comparing to D5, D6.
Mirrorless still has an edge in my opinion and I can only compare from my own experience
Great detailed video Mark. I'm going to switch from Nikon (D7500 + 200-500) to Sony once the A7 IV comes out and will pair it with the Sony 200-600. I hopefully should have enough saved up for both!
You read my mind! Let’s see how the specs on the a7iv play out
@@bornufree Agreed! Can't wait to see the official specs.
you are better off getting a used A9 for not much higher price than the coming A7 IV. A7IV won't have stacked sensor, which is the magic juice of A9, enabling blackout free high speed shooting with minimal rolling shutter, A7IV can't match that for sure. People use A9 with electronic shutter almost all the time, so shutter count on a used A9 does not really matter.
Thanks again Mark! Using Canon for 10+ years, heavily invested... moving to Sony, won't look back...
Great story. I ave lived it in my own experience. Love the enthusiasm, and the photos. Initially I HATED the EVF until I switched back to DSLR. When I saw the power of the viewfinder i understood and switched to mirror less.
High in the mountains in Colorado... 🤔
lol
What do you think John Denver was singing about? 😂
Mark ,pleaee advise and guide .
I currently own a nikon d850 with Sigma 150 600 sports lens for aviation photography.
I have an option to either buy Nikon 500pf 5.6 lens or Sony A1 with sony 200-600mm lens.
Which shall be a good option for me for aviation photography (jets and helicopters)
Sony
@@MarkSmithphotography thanks alot captain
This is probably the only time I will not agree with you on some things, but thanks for the explanation on why you switched.
Great story, great storyteller. I had lots of fun watching. Thanks.
Hi, i earlerly awaiting your first bird shots with the Sony alpha 1. Having said that i have an A7R4 and 200-600, would suggest i get an A1 and use the same lens or get a 600 F4 glass. Budget no bar but i can get only either 1 at a time.
I just went through the same decision. GM pros: slightly better IQ, less noise iff you can & want to shoot wide open, slightly faster AF, tack sharp at 600f4.0, takes TC1.4 very well. G zoom pros: smaller, significantly lighter, can zoom out where required, much cheaper, tack sharp at 600f6.3, takes TC1.4 ok-ish. So basically the GM has more weight, is less flexible and much more expensive but has some extra IQ. So I'm going for the A1 and keep my 200-600. I actually heard of someone selling his 600GM since his 200-600G on the A1 was good enough and lighter.
I have owned the RIV, and still own the 200-600 and 600 GM along with the Alpha 1. The 200-600 works great on the A1, pretty well with the 1.4X. The 600GM works extremely well with the 1.4X, enough to where I don't even want to take it off. 2x also works relatively well. If you don't wanna drop 13k the 200-600 will do but the 600 is something special.
@@daran0815 I am using my A1 with my 600mm F4 and love this combo. I have the 200 600mm G as well and I would never sell my 600mm F4 for the 200-600...But of course it's the more versatile lens but the image quality is not as good as on the big white...
@@71Enno I don't think I'd sell the 600f4 either, would I have one. I do see the point of not wanting overly heavy gear, though.
@Daran from hell / @Hellcat, so basically its better to get A1 and use the 200-600 is what i can take from what you say. The major issue with A7RIV and 200-600 is the time it takes to focus, if you want to start tracking a bird especially in flight it seems like taking for ever to go from blur to getting everything in focus i have read and heard many people complain about the same problem, in fact i had the A7Riii before a couple of months and that was much better with this lens. No dount 200-600 is super value for money and help create great images after the legendary NIkkor 200-500 F5.6 ED this Sony seems to be the go to for wildlife especially birds. Surely i would also keep that lens but just debating with myself on weather I should add glass to the RiV or add another body to the 200-600.
It looks like my local camera shop owes you a commission check. I've been debating all winter if I should invest further in my nikon dslr, or jump to mirrorless now. This review pushed me over the edge. Traded in my nikon d500 and 200-500 and am now waiting for my A1 and 200-600mm. I'll be impatiently waiting for your A1 setup guide to get me started in the right direction again.
Right on the nitty gritty shift button. Superb images Mark, phew !! > means mastery of instruments and instincts you have 🪶 Look forward to those rare special moments and bonus Apidae too Whenever the buzzing moment transpires . (Nikon had me on the frustrated. fence for so long ~ my feeties are tingling sony talons for lift off !)
I've bit off all my nails as you've laid out why you've dumped your D850. I bought a D850 three years ago and am just getting to a good place with it. I've invested in some glass, three $1800 lenses and considering my big lens purchases and then I found this video. BLAH! Exciting but my stomach is a mess! I'm learning how to be a conservation photographer and I'm trying to gear up to make sure I can nail my shots. I don't think I couldn't have picked a more expensive profession! LOL! Thanks for your fun videos and for sharing your amazing photos and animal videos. You're truly gifted and a kind person.
Thanks for the kind words. Just get the z9 and keep your glass.
I can so relate to your dilemma! What to do...what to do? Looks like the Sony A9 is in my future! Thanks for all the great info!
Consider getting an A9 or A9II used if you can't afford the A1. We're kind of between models on the A9 series right now. I really had to laugh about the "tiny" 100-400mm f/4-5.6 lens. That's a much more capable lens than you might think.
@@stuartschaffner9744 The tiny !00-400 is one of thew best lens from sony , sometimes I use it for Macrophotography . I used to use Nikon . I switchewd to sony .I am very happy with that. Still I have Nikon D750, D850. Nikon Z6 which was a bad decision I made.
I know that once I have this A1 camera on my hands and able to fly to Florida. I will contact you for some lovely workshops. Keep up your wonderful work 😊
Sounds like a familiar story, although I've been riding the fence between Sony and Canon for the last 5 years or so. I haven't yet bought a large prime on the Sony side but have hedged my bets for a while longer picking up the EOS R5 to use with my 500mm F/4. For now I use both Sony and Canon side by side regularly, but if I go with one system on a shoot I will grab the Sony bag 90% of the time because I know I can get the shot.
Have you tried F-Mount Nikon lenses ON a Sony body ?? If so, do you have examples / a video on that ?
One of your most helpful videos ever. I’m seriously rethinking my purchase plans.
When you mention the Ruggard bag, you can please note that the bag is designed by BH employees, and sold under the Ruggard brand, which is under the Gradus Group, which is also a BH, owned, company. Any Vello, Impact, Ruggard, and a couple more, on BH websight, are BH designed products.
Used Canon 1dx Mark ii and MRk iii plus Nikon D5 and D6 cameras in action,Sports and wildlife areas both in day and nighttime use. I tried the Sony A9 and what turned me off Sony was the crappy battery life in comparison to my Canon and Nikon cameras and the small size body and menu system wrecking my head especially for covering all day athletics,football, rugby,soccer events. Stay with my Canon and Nikon cameras as the Sony for me the overall robustness is not on par with either the 1dx or nikon d5,d6 cameras.
I will try the Nikon z9
Lol battery on the A9ii is excellent if setup correctly. Furthermore the A9ii will outperform all cameras you mentioned
@@nrocha2466 I used the Sony A9 and its small size whilst wearing gloves I'm sub zero 🌡 and it's ergonomics we're off putting especially if you have large hands
@@NikCan66 you must have enormous hands. Lol. I've heard that one before from many Nikon fanboys. Your name tell us a lot about you... You must enjoy trolling Sony users. Too bad Nikon is in 3rd place these days...second to both Sony and Canon
@@nrocha2466 I use Canon and Nikon plus leica cameras for my work. I'm not a fanboy of any make. The ergonomic and actual robustness is fairly mediocre in Sony cameras against other makes plus resembles a game conse hand controller in build. Tried Sony A1 and A9 cameras for 3 months but just couldn't find it enjoyable.
@@NikCan66 lol I don't believe anything you say. That's why your here watching this video ha? Yeah sure!
Hi Mark I just started bird photography in May this year. I was able to buy 2nd hand nikon 200-500mm and a D500. Both seller seems to be glad they see me. I guess I know why. But even if I know how good the Sony A9 or A1 are, I still have to go with the D500 first as it is way cheaper. After short 5 months and about 500 Mb of raw pics later, I am also in a transition and the only hope I have with Nikon is the Z9. If it doesn't work I will probably switch to the A7R4 first.
Did you sell all you Nikon gear then? Assume you did to fund the Sony kit. Only just got a D500 myself after using a D7200 for wildlife. I agree Sony and mirrorless in general is the way to go and is the future, but a D500 makes sense for me cost-wise right now. Great video anyway Mark - thanks for sharing.
No, I gave my Nikon stuff to my brother!
@@MarkSmithphotography Very generous of you Mark, going to a great new home there I'm sure 👍
What camera would you recommend for marine wildlife photography? Often have light bouncing off the water or am on a rocky boat.
Well that is the answer. On to Sony and no more waiting for Nikon to get their act together. D7200 to A1
My father is about to make the switch to Sony as well from a D7200. He isnt getting an A1 though. He isnt sure if he wants the A7R III like I have or stick with 24mp and get either the A7 III or A9.
OK, the appropriate title for this video should really be "why I switched from DSLR to mirrorless". Now that Nikon has Z9 camera that's is better than Sony and, Nikon has just started to offer the Z 800 lens which appears amazing. We would really appreciate if you could review Z9 camera + Z800 lens combo, and let us know how it works. Thanks!
Question: With the A1 out, I am guessing you have either sold your R5 or it’s redundant at this point?
I still have it and plan on keeping it but I prefer the Sony gear
Never had the problem with the 500mm PF you describe on BIF.
It seems that most features people love about the Sony cameras are the features inherent to any mirrorless system: smaller bodies, smaller lenses (less flange distance), true WYSIWYG in the EVF regarding exposure, no need for lens AF fine-tuning, no mirror so much higher FPS possible ... For wildlife photography, the eye-detection AF isn't there yet for any brand. Sony is the leader in the mirrorless segment (which will make DSLRs a thing of the past; just like DSLRs made SLRs obsolete) as they have been focused on it for multiple years by now. Canon caught up, Nikon ignored it for too long. As a Nikon shooter with the D500, I see little need to switch to mirrorless: the main reason for me would be the silent shutter as that would greatly help in photographing from a blind. But, when I compare the keeper rate that I get to the occasional mirrorless attempt, I see no difference. But then again, I rarely spend much time shooting small, erratic birds. What I definitely don't choose to do is to switch brands. Nikon is catching up. The Z6ii and Z7ii with the latest firmware are getting very close. The Z9 will get there (I hope). :-)
you make a good point. The mistake most people make is comparing a new model with the model they’re currently using. Best to compare the newest model of the brand they’re using
If it works for you then there is absolutely no reason to change gears which is a very expensive exercise. For me is more the attitude that Nikon had for many years to not wanting to improve or change things that has bothered me. Now they are playing catch up but it is too late imo. Sony with the A1 has made a camera that is hard to beat even for Sony as I can’t imagine why you would need or want more than that camera!
Please which is better for photograhy nikon d5600 or canon m50 or canon sl3?