AC Sine Wave Generation and Frequency

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @enriqueyacon6065
    @enriqueyacon6065 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you for your video. Im electrician, I never understood the sine wave theory. Now, I'm refreshing my knowledge, and your video made simple to comprehend.

  • @rale6470
    @rale6470 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your videos are great and it really helps me in my studies. Thanks, sir!

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad they are helping! Thanks for watching!

  • @kevinmorgan3561
    @kevinmorgan3561 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very well explained

  • @examwala1785
    @examwala1785 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am from india and I like your video ❤️

  • @5084204
    @5084204 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation. One thing that puzzles me for a long time: 230V AC, does it mean, that between my 0o and 90o I have 230V (+), then between 270o and 360o 230V (-ve), or is it rather 90o to 270o -> 230V. In essence: 115V above x line and 115V below?

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No it's actually what's called an RMS or effective value. It's a little complicated to explain, but watch out for a future video on it!

  • @squeaksallan8195
    @squeaksallan8195 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    dose 120 increase if there are more poles. . . 4*3600/240=60 would that be right ???

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No.
      120 is a constant value and it never changes.

    • @squeaksallan8195
      @squeaksallan8195 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ZackHartle Thank you for the reply, would you be kind enough to enplane way. . .

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@squeaksallan8195 So because frequency is cycles per second, we need to turn Revolutions per minute into seconds, s we divide by 60 and because it take a pair of poles to complete a cycles, we divide individual poles by 2. Therefore we divide by ( 2 x 60 ) which is 120

    • @squeaksallan8195
      @squeaksallan8195 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ZackHartle Thank you again, so even with the stater on the out side(no iron) and the magnet on the inside with an odd number, the same would still be true???

    • @ZackHartle
      @ZackHartle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@squeaksallan8195 I don't think I understand what you mean exactly. Sorry!

  • @mjmjersey
    @mjmjersey ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome