Excellent explanation. One thing that puzzles me for a long time: 230V AC, does it mean, that between my 0o and 90o I have 230V (+), then between 270o and 360o 230V (-ve), or is it rather 90o to 270o -> 230V. In essence: 115V above x line and 115V below?
@@squeaksallan8195 So because frequency is cycles per second, we need to turn Revolutions per minute into seconds, s we divide by 60 and because it take a pair of poles to complete a cycles, we divide individual poles by 2. Therefore we divide by ( 2 x 60 ) which is 120
@@ZackHartle Thank you again, so even with the stater on the out side(no iron) and the magnet on the inside with an odd number, the same would still be true???
Very well explained
Your videos are great and it really helps me in my studies. Thanks, sir!
Glad they are helping! Thanks for watching!
I am from india and I like your video ❤️
Excellent explanation. One thing that puzzles me for a long time: 230V AC, does it mean, that between my 0o and 90o I have 230V (+), then between 270o and 360o 230V (-ve), or is it rather 90o to 270o -> 230V. In essence: 115V above x line and 115V below?
No it's actually what's called an RMS or effective value. It's a little complicated to explain, but watch out for a future video on it!
Awesome
dose 120 increase if there are more poles. . . 4*3600/240=60 would that be right ???
No.
120 is a constant value and it never changes.
@@ZackHartle Thank you for the reply, would you be kind enough to enplane way. . .
@@squeaksallan8195 So because frequency is cycles per second, we need to turn Revolutions per minute into seconds, s we divide by 60 and because it take a pair of poles to complete a cycles, we divide individual poles by 2. Therefore we divide by ( 2 x 60 ) which is 120
@@ZackHartle Thank you again, so even with the stater on the out side(no iron) and the magnet on the inside with an odd number, the same would still be true???
@@squeaksallan8195 I don't think I understand what you mean exactly. Sorry!