GENERATIVE FILL A.I. in Photoshop is INCREDIBLE for Photographers 😳
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ค. 2024
- #photoshop #generativefill #ai #adobe #creativecloud
Incredible NEW Generative Fill Artificial Intelligence technology in Photoshop totally changes editing for the BETTER both Practically and Creatively!
😊 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐄𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲
www.glyndewis.com
𝐏𝐢𝐗𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭 (𝐔𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐡) 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐓𝐮𝐛𝐞 • The BIGGEST Photoshop ...
🎬 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐕𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐎
00:00 - Introduction
01:07 - Changing the Composition
03:46 - Adding Floor and Chair Legs
05:10 - Repairing a Damaged Photograph
06:33 - 7 Kings Must Die
07:00 - Adding a New Mouth
07:19 - Adding Cuts and Blood
07:25 - User Guidelines
07:41 - Adding Hair
08:16 - Editing Layers
08:48 - Thoughts on A.I. in Photoshop
🖥 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐧𝐐 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐈 𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐡𝐬 ... 𝐒𝐖𝟑𝟐𝟏𝐂
🖥 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐧𝐐 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐈 𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 ... 𝐏𝐃𝟑𝟒𝟐𝟎𝐐
glyndewis.com/gear
𝐀𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐐𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐦𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐫 𝐈 𝐝𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐩 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐒𝐖 𝐨𝐫 𝐏𝐃 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲. 𝐅𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐞 𝐚 𝐝𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐭 𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐦𝐲 𝐰𝐞𝐛𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐢𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮❜𝐝 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞.
•𝐌𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐬, 𝐓𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐬, 𝐋𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝟑𝐫𝐝𝐬, 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐬, 𝐓𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐞𝐭𝐜 ... (𝐌𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐀𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐲):
bit.ly/3ddtZno
𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦 / 𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐓𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫: @𝐠𝐥𝐲𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐬
𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 📘📘📙📗
The Photoshop Layers and Selections Workshop: amzn.to/2U2Gjg
The Photoshop Toolbox: amzn.to/3b7n6Rt
Photograph Like a Thief: amzn.to/3rHSJqC
The Photoshop Workbook: amzn.to/2X5dWwB
![24 ชั่วโมง ซื้อของสีเดียว!! [Ver.2024]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TNPgzIMr_w8/mqdefault.jpg)
So excited to try out generative fill! I was impressed with kahmas ability to generate stunning AI profile photos.
We've been testing the fill feature and I have to say it's pretty amazing. We actually couldn't believe how accurate the fill is. We had a vertical image of two subjects in a train station (surrounded by trains on either side and wanted to see if it could fill for a horizontal. Well, it filled in the trains and walkway perfectly and even added correct colors/grading, lighting and DOF. We also tested it out with an image of a couple during fireworks on a balcony with hundreds of people below BUT there was an annoying table with drinks and a mans leg in the shot (couldn't ask him to move). The fill perfectly rebuilt the railing with spindles, filled in people below and added directional lighting. Amazing. I'm not a big fan of Adobe and their politics but on a purely technical level this is a huge positive development.
Integrating this with Photoshop makes the whole graphic and visual design scene even more crazier . Let see where this takes us . Results are really astonishing
It's insane what this and AI generated artwork can do. And this is only just the start of it - It's still hit or miss sometimes, but in a year or two it'll be so much better, and it's already pretty amazing.
What I love most about it (other than speeding edits up by a lot, and making previously impossible things now possible), is that it does allow so much more control over creativity. Things you couldn't do before or could only imagine in your head, are now much more achievable. Previously my skills might not have been good enough to get exactly what I wanted, or to fix things that really annoyed me about a photo, but this literally does it in seconds, and usually way better than I could have done it.
Combining this with Midjourney means it's a pretty exciting time for creative work - but it does also mean you can no longer trust any image you see as being real.
Great to hear you find the A.I. helpful
I don't think I'd call it creative work per se.
It's more like uncreative work.
The AI software is doing the "creative" part.
Instant gratification (especially when used by non-creatives), with AI being the workhorse part of the art or photography, will just subdue real human creativity by laziness and lack of pursuing skills and fresh, new ideas and concepts.
this is insane, I have been playing with it with mixed results, the good results are really crazy good, the bad results are comically bad, but of course its in Beta, once it has been improved and understood with user submited data it is going to be insane
I love it. Our design team does as well. We’re always asked for extracurricular things to spice up images in post, or remove very difficult things like cranes, forklifts, woodpiles and tricky license plates. This has greatly sped up mock-ups and workflows. It’s light years better than content aware algorithm and this is still in its infancy, let’s see how accurate it gets 2-5 years from now.
I've been experimenting with it to change or extend backgrounds; I've made a blank wall slightly less blank by adding some faded graffiti to it; and, most egregiously, I livened up a boring corner by materializing a cat in it (Generative Fill did an excellent job on the cat.) But here's the kicker: This technology depends on the machine-learning model being "trained" on huge sets of prototypical images, which it slices and dices to execute your generative prompt. So the more your concept is commonplace, mundane, and obvious, the more likely the MLM is to have been trained on something similar, enabling it to produce excellent results. Meanwhile, the more idiosyncratic, unique, and distinctive your original concept, the less likely the MLM will find similar source materials in its training set, and the more likely it is to produce an "off"-looking result. You can almost use it like a naffness meter -- the more it improves your image, the weaker your original idea was in the first place...
Great experimentation here, Glyn. I love how it handles the shadows and lighting from original image. Also a great way of adjusting to somehing that seems obvious is here tostay. It truly is the creative mind that produces the final image and AI is just another, albeit phenomenal tool.
100% agree with you there
You can tell how advanced of a leap it was because the first reaction from everyone was to get scared... like we'd just seen fire for the first time and it looked like magic.
I agree with the last part for someone who are creative and professional its an added tool, for others will be just filling their portfolio with unrealistic photos, and people by their nature will not care to distinguish between authentic photos that uses the tool to enhance or just completely generated by AI. The value and story behind a photograph will not matter as AI eliminates the hassle of going out and shoot your photos ( in majority of none photographer’s mind set)
Initially, I started to feel threatened by AI fearing that i would be out of work very soon. But then i decided I'm still the one in charge of creativity, and I'm just going to make AI my bitch, and consider it another powerful tool in the box.
@@DavidStarkdyvarg Completely agree with you here.
Absolutely love the Generative fill, used in on many of my photos already!
👍🏻
The stool example was mind-blowing to me! So much fun ahead for us!
Incredible huh 😃
I absolutely love your education style. You always deliver. Thank you
Thanks so much Charles
Thanks Glen, one of the best demos of this AI tool I have seen.
Its about time Photoshop caught up to our creative genius, way to go team!
Thank you, Glyn for the video and the explanations. 🌷
You're welcome ; thanks for watching
Love it! Very creative and to think you can repair our treasured photos that were damaged, so great!
Love this!!!
I used the generative fill on a recent composite of 9 dogs. Extending the background in the same way you did on your farmer portrait.
So brilliant!
Nice one 😃
I haven't had a chance to try the Generative Fill yet but Unmesh Dinda (Piximperfect) states that the fill resolution is limited to a cap of 1024 pixels on the long side which implies that you need to keep you "fill" selection areas within this "cap" to maintain the resolution of bigger images. The examples you've shown don't seem to address this Glyn - so I'd be interested in your view on this issue.
In the wider context, whilst I agree that creative images makers will use these tools to add to their creations - my concern is that Ai technology will be another big step in driving photography and design down to the lowest common denominator, with the result that it will become even more difficult for professional photographers and designers to make a living. As a book cover stock photographer it concerns me that the market will eventually be inundated with Ai generated images and designs that have never, as it were, seen the inside of a camera but generated from text prompts alone. There has already been one high-profile example of this where Bloomsbury used an Ai generated image on the cover of "House of Earth and Blood".
Great video. Really impressive, and I think ya, this is the first AAA studio that has taken the new AI art software and run with it in a pleasing familiar UI. Looks fun too!
Amazing!! This a practical use... I love it!
The world is changing at quite rapid speed my friends. This is beyond game changing.
It sure is 😃
adding fog etc with A.i sold it for me! I always feel like I need a fog machine or aerisol can. Can't wait to use it! :D
Photography is now more like painting than ever before. Creating the changes is not "fake / false" but merely allowing photographers to become creative painters. This is beyond impressive and opens massive improvement potential for any "creator." Thanks for your video.
m.th-cam.com/video/BwmAPSXgXbA/w-d-xo.htmlsub_confirmation=1
@ANASTASI LINE does painting only become painting when you get dirty? What if you use paint while staying clean? And what if your mouse is so dirty that you get messy while using the computer? Hmm. Besides, there are many paintings known by well known painters which are "painted over". So that is no argument.
@ANASTASI LINE DID I EVER SAY ANYTHING THAT CONTRADICTS YOUR STATEMENTS?. AND WHY ARE WE TYPING IN CAPITALS?
eventually these tools will be so good you won't need anyone.
@ANASTASI LINE and what does this have to do with anything beeing said? :D
Absolutely game changing
Great video. Thanks.
I think it is great. Although it blurs the line of what is real and what is not ... soon enough we won't be able to tell the difference. I wonder what effect that will have in how we perceive our reality and how we process it. Video is next ...
Enjoyed this video, thank you! Saw your Photoshop Summit tutorial, looking forward to the next one!
Thanks a lot
Slightly depressing that I use a lot of negative space purposefully in my wedding shots, and now everyone just does it in post 😂
I love it for taking lens glare off the subjects glasses, and taking tourists out of travel photos. I also find it takes people's watermarks (if you use them) out very neat and fast. I tried 3 different watermarks. One of them I got the warning but the other 2 worked perfectly. Of course I wouldn't do this to anyone's property for real but I wanted to see if it would work. Also as I mentioned before, it doesn't add clouds to a panorama image too well. There is way more positives about it going forward that the negative. Looking forward to Adobe putting it in PS permanently.
When I was a production artist I can think of spendiing two days retouching a photo to clean up a beach to be used for a big boating campaign. With this generate function, I am thinking less than an hour would have been needed. This is powerful for things like that. For that this is beyond good. For the creative mind this is exponential .
But it's also two days of paid work lost.
@@saiyaniam on that but then you can pick up new work
@@mickeydeneher2301 or the Indian kid who can use AI and live cheaply will completely undercut you
@@saiyaniam oh well
This is a tremendous video! I am a photo retoucher and the new AI is a thrill to have - soon - haven't checked out the Beta, but will now! Thanks so much for your enthusiasm!
Very cool video! Well done!
Thanks alot
I spent some time learning this new feature in Photoshop yesterday. I love it and am excited to see how it will evolve. This is another excellent tool I will use when needed, and understand it is limited so I will always have to put my finishing touches on the final image. I had some things I wanted to accomplish with Midjourney and could not with its deep learning curve. This PSD AI feature is a walk in the park. Of course, there will be those who will exploit it and think they are now real artists by using it by creating tacky art, just like the millions who believe they are real photographers using their cell phones & DSLRs on auto mode.
FYI, real photographers often use auto exposure modes and autofocus on their DSLRs.
Yeah, generative fill is a total game-changer. I've worked with retouching for almost two decades, and this honestly blows my mind.
It's a game-changer for those who are playing the game of manipulating their photos into illustrations.
@@yeohi But what about those, who you seem to have ingnored, who "manipulate" their photos ever-so-slightly, well short of 'illustration'? Is it not a game-changer for them too?
Excellent video. Thank you.
Thank you
This new fill is amazing! Photos just took a huge step forward.
Brilliant, What about the "not for commercial use" agreement?
Great!
Insane!
Hi Glyn, was curious if you've compare Topaz Gigapixel vs Adobe Photoshop's Upscaling.
That's awesome...Adobe finally found an answer to fixing the issue in the first 2 photos that we have been struggling with for many years! (either cloning or try stretching the photos 😅)
That was Great 🤩👍
Great video. I have been playing with this for a couple days now. It’s mind blowing. I realize this is a beta version, but is there anyway to use this as a plugin with LR Classic????
Wow, you've got some great use cases there. At this point it's just a tool to augment our own creativity. It's great for cleaning up images, and obviously for so much more. I'm looking forward to seeing how it progresses, but in my mind it will never be the end of photography. A large part of photography is just being out, camera in hand, and I can't replicate that with AI.
Exactly that
@@glyndewis Yeah but no one will care if it's taken outside or generated. AI is here to replace the craft, anyone that thinks otherwise is delusional. Just give it time and we'll all be replaced.
I agree wholeheartedly with your summation. Thanks Glyn.
Thank you Pip; interesting times ahead
What you can do with Generative Fill is mind boggling. I haven't made up my mind as to whether I will try it as yet. Basically because when you start adding things to an original photo it is no longer your creaion per se, it now becomes a composite using AI or images from Adobe stock files.
Very Nice 😮
Thanks Ricardo
You absolutely hit the nail on the head with the explanation of your perspective on AI/Editing.
Photography isn't about simply having the skill or talent of pointing a camera with the correct settings anymore, it's about fulfilling a vision that you as the photographer have in mind.
Taking the photo is just the beginning step in the process, post processing whether it be simple adjustments or in depth complex edits is a very important step in the creative process of photographers.
I've heard mixed perspectives over the years, even gained & lost clients based on whether any editing (even basic adjustments) would be used.
The decision to edit is also a personal one, some photographers simply choose not to, some rely only on basics, and others use whatever means they can to achieve their goal.
No method or outlook is better than the other, all that is different between them is the path between the start and end result.
As a former Polaroid dealer, this is quite the departure from "instant print"
Your voice is so well mixed! 😂 Fun video thank you! 🎉
hi Glyn. can u make some examples of high key/low key wildlife photos using generative AI. the struggle i have with my wildlife are chaotic backgrounds and that is bushes.:-)
Amazing. I'm so excited to play with it more - I've already used the ai generative fill to expand photos and it's truly mind-blowing. Would love to see more videos for inspiration.
Thank and yeah no problem ... will be done
I'm glad you did this video. It's helped me do better photography. I'm now going through all my photos and deleting every one of them where I borrowed unneeded help from other photos. I want to be REAL.
Nice one 👍
Thank you Amazing tool
Great video Glyn, as always beautifully explained. I have 'played' with an image I took recently and am really amazed at how Generative Fill works. It does beg the question though about any future images that I am viewing, are they 'real' ?!!
Brilliant video! You're spot on with your comment at the end. I've had ideas floating around in my head for years that I just don't have the time or energy to produce due to having to learn new several new software packages extensively. Now I can take my main skills of PS compositing and color grading and combine them with Ai to produce these art pieces. It's about using the tools that we are giving to our advantage.
100% agree with you there. Glad you liked the video 👍🏻
love your charisma and teaching style
Very kind ... thank you
Pretty impressive, Glyn.
Ive been using filler textures forever, this changes everything. Sign me up Adobe!
Hi Glyn yet another great video. Can you tell me if the Remove tool uses pixels from the original image and not add pixels it’s got from else where. I do know you don’t need the internet to use it so it’s not using the cloud to generate the pixels for the image. I’m just researching the ethics of the AI generative tools for competition purposes. Thanks
Brilliant..
I love it. Gives you complete creative freedom to express yourself in ways that are now less limited. I don't have huge amounts of money for a studio, so using AI can really plug that gap for me.
Great that this technology is going to be so useful for you 👍🏻
While the assertion you mentioned emphasizes the role of our minds, hands, and tools in expressing creativity, there are indeed other perspectives to consider. Here are a few alternative viewpoints:
Environment and Inspiration: Creativity can also be influenced by external factors such as the environment we inhabit and the experiences we encounter. Our surroundings, interactions with others, and exposure to different cultures and ideas can all contribute to our creative expression.
Emotion and Intuition: Creativity often emerges from a deeper level of emotional and intuitive understanding. It is not solely a product of our cognitive processes or the tools we use. Our feelings, instincts, and personal experiences can play a significant role in shaping our creative output.
Collaboration and Interactions: Creativity can be enhanced through collaboration and interaction with others. Engaging in discussions, brainstorming sessions, and receiving feedback from peers can foster new ideas and perspectives, transforming individual creativity into collective creativity.
Constraints and Limitations: Sometimes, limitations and constraints can actually fuel creativity. When faced with challenges or restricted resources, individuals may find innovative ways to overcome these obstacles and generate unique solutions or artistic expressions.
Imagination and Vision: Creativity often originates from the power of imagination and the ability to envision possibilities beyond the present. It involves the capacity to think beyond what currently exists, to dream, and to visualize novel concepts or artistic creations.
Inner Exploration: Self-reflection, introspection, and personal growth can also contribute to creativity. Exploring our own thoughts, beliefs, and emotions can lead to self-expression and the generation of original ideas.
It's important to note that creativity is a complex and multifaceted concept, and different individuals may have unique perspectives on what fuels their creative process. The interplay between our minds, hands, tools, environment, emotions, and interactions ultimately shapes how we express our creativity to the world.
Generated by ChatGPT - but I pretty much agree :-)
In the portrait of the farmer, the generated areas of rock & grass lack what is important in those areas of the original, the fine gritty texture. Simply adding more stuff that resembles the original portion says that the artist didn't understand what was of value, ie what made the look valuable. In fact were the final version the original, it would have been improved by cropping back to the vertical version. So while this is a great tool it does nothing for visual judgement.
You do understand "beta"?
The stool one BLEW MY MIND
Yeah me too 😃
Terrific stuff, yeah! I agree, the extending of the stool was pure genius on the part of Adobe. Finally, I'm not worried about these advances with AI - I reserve the right to amend ,my opinion as the technology improves - as I agree with what you saidm everything starts in our own minds.
I can see how fantastic this might be and helpful for the film industry and other creative professionals. For me as a hobby getting so automatic will take the fun out of it and makes me feel a cheat. As always each to their own, I prefer all software to slow down and I will stick with old familiar software to still enjoy my hobby. Thanks for sharing.
Don't understand how this stops any enjoyment of using software. Would you never use 'Content Aware Fill' and choose to manually clone and heal?
@@glyndewis that’s exactly my point, …..to manually… so I can do the work myself which is what I like to use software for like in Snapseed and Darkroom+ As I said AI is useful for those that need it but not for me despite how impressively shown in your video. Not against it just not for me.
@@glyndewis Its like driving with automatic transmission. Its so usefull and comfortable but all my cars are manual anyway. Its just more fun and i like the control.
It's worth noting that Generative fill only does 1024x1024 pixels and stretches the result. So large backgrounds can be grainy and artifacty - although there is a workaround which is easily internet findable. I've found this handy for shots where I haven't quite left enough background and need more space in the photo.
I'm finding AI a bit of a giant everythingburger - if you don't know what you're trying to achieve you'll end up with everything, and kind of, nothing...
Yeah I've done a video about the 1024 x 1024
Amazing what technology is evolving into!
Sure is
I've always used alternative software to Photoshop, but honestly this is a game changer and I'm considering switching. Are there any requirements to use this tool? Also, do you need to pay extra to enable it, or is it enabled with an ordinary Photoshop subscription?... And, is there a feature to add objects to a photo? I've recently started making framed wall art mockups using stock photos of interior rooms, but it's so time consuming to make the frame blend in with the room and look realistic. If I could just write a prompt to add a blank frame on a wall, and if it looks as realistic as the chair's legs, that would save me like 99% of the time I spend doing it manualy
Yes you could select a specific area and then prompt for a blank frame in the space.
Well said these are new tools similar to what was digital art against traditional art.
fantastic...
I just used the remove tool to remove a blurry robin from in front of my bird photo of a juvenile starling. using the remove tool. I then used generative fill to generate a new tail for my bird. After a second try, I got a near perfect result!
Superb
WOW!!! that is astonishing almost like wizardry
You've made by far the most compelling video on Adobe AI Generative Fill, taking all the really important perspectives into account. No drama, just advantages with a philosophical ending. Very very nicely done, thanks.
Excellent break down
great video i sub
Thank you
I have played with it since the day it came out and it blows me away, it feels like when layers were created in PS version3!
Generating people, is not good at all at this junction nor is the the resolution for production printing,
I cannot wait until transparency is part of the generative layer for this will add to the awesome power in creating composite imagery.
However taking into consideration it is in a beta form and in it's infancy I know than in a year or two it will only get better and compete with Mid Journey and the likes,
Thanks Adobe, Sensei and Firefly
It’s Fabulous Glyn and I had to edit a photo for a friends baby with a hand that needed removing and I couldn’t get it to look right using just photoshop but with the new Generative Fill it was a piece of cake 👌🏼
Brilliant
Is this in the neural filters option or in the normal filter menu? Thanks, Looks very cool
It's currently only in the public beta version of Photoshop, and it appears in a "context bar" which also is new in the beta version.
When I hear people arguing this, it takes me back to when people said digital cameras weren't "real" photography. Embrace the future or get left behind.
It’s nuts
as a composite photographer this will make my life easier.
Yes!
I manage to cut the feets of a man and his two dogs, and tried to fill it in with generative fill. There was some strange results at first, but after a few shots, it saved the whole image. But it added some weird banding in the sky that I fixed with the good old remove tool. Later I figured out I had forgotten to add lens correction in Lightroom that caused the banding because off the vignette from the lens 😂 Used right, this is a great feature.
I love the creative opportunities and the ability to enhance one's own original work.
The main thing that concerns me though (with AI generation generally, not just Adobe's Generative Fill) is where the replacement / additional elements are being harvested from other photographers' work. For instance, were all the hair options for the viking created from scratch by Photoshop? Far more likely they were derived at least in part from the work of another unknown, unpaid photographer. Next time it may be your work making-up someone else's photo. Is that saleable as an original work? Is it copywritable? What happens when the client spots that 'copy' in another work, when they think they have an original work with exclusive rights?... That potential come-back bothers me. Not to mention how I will feel when the faces of my family taken from my Facebook galleries start appearing on toilet roll ads...
Secondly, I really don't like the idea that Adobe can say 'NO' to whatever I want to create. What the h*** has it got to do with them? 'Computer says no'!...
It's bad enough that my lenses are computerised, without my editing software starting to preach morality! Bah humbug! ;)
chat-gpt has that same problem.
For some reason they think they can 'limit' the potential for morally / ethically questionable things by preventing 'bad commands', while at the same time not even beginning to answer the big question : whose source material is being used and are they getting fair compensation ?
It's tricky enough as is for samples in music/audio, because humans are doing that (for now). I can't even begin to imagine the potential for ethical/moral issues when 'the machine' has done this with zero proof of source material.
according to PHLEARN's recent post about this same subject, Adobe is only using images from its massive collection of Adobe Stock, as opposed to random harvesting from the internet.
@@thatericguy1 Adobe Stock doesn’t hold the copyrights to independent Adobe Stock contributors’ work, so it isn’t really their own library. From what I understand, Adobe Stock contributors have not to date been compensated by Adobe for the use of their photos to train the AI software. As a related aside, an artist’s share of the Adobe Stock licensing fee = 33-35%, and Adobe’s share = 65-67%. So Adobe makes almost twice what the artist does for each stock photo/video download - they can afford to compensate. Adobe claims they are working towards a compensation model, but as they say, that ship has already sailed. Adobe Stock contributors can’t opt out of data set training either, so if they want to sell their photos on Adobe Stock, they are basically agreeing to let Adobe use their images for free to create software they weren’t told about in enough detail to make an educated decision up front - software that will eventually replace them. It’s a passive form of pay-to-play, which is still a form of exploiting artists without paying them, only worse because they are using artists to train their replacements. If we think that this won’t replace stock artists to a huge extent, we aren’t paying attention. In my opinion, the right thing for Adobe to have done would have been to set up the compensation model before they used the contributors’ images, clearly described to artists how they planned to use their work (that’s what everyone else has to do when they license an image), and provide an opt out if an artist didn’t want their images used to train the software.
@@L8chasr very good points. Here’s hoping the compensation model evolves to a more satisfactory solution for Stock contributors.
@@thatericguy1 Interesting. Even if that is true of Adobe, it begs a couple of questions, such as whether contributors were specifically asked if they approved their images for AI harvesting. Elsewhere, Getty have an ongoing legal battle with stability AI, who they allege have harvested 12 million images without permission or payment, with AI companies claiming 'fair use'.
what about importing video and working on content, i'm downloading it right now but curious to know about the video side of it.
I wonder if this is eventually going to be an extra subscription. I hope it will be included in the photography plan.
This sounds too good to be true, cant wait to try it out myself and see the magic.
this is scary stuff Glyn. I love it as it will make my job as a content creator easier but there is also a scary side to it where thousands of people will be out of jobs.
It is with this technical development just like previous developments. You can use it in a positive way and use it for less noble purposes. Producing beautiful creations, but also fake news. It is then not the technology that is the problem, but the user. Work that previously could only be performed by paid specialists can now be done at the touch of a button. This will bring change for people in the field, but that was already the case with the rise of digital photography.
You chose the exact word to describe the stool and floor generation - INSANE!!!!!!!! Many thanks!!!!
😃👍🏻👍🏻
Amazing
That's impressive but expected step forward. I'm glad that artists now can focus more on creativity and perfecting images, and spend less time on routine.
Funny thing is I downloaded the beta and did everything everyone said to get it working on both on an apple and windows and it’s still not giving me the option to use the generative fill.
Yep - I have an adobe subscription
I'm trying Photoshop Beta in particular the Generative Fill function to increase the photos all around, I'm doing various tests, I mainly shoot with Canon Eos R5 with 45 million megapixels, with the original photos the artificial intelligence only works on skies or out of focus parts , with detailed subjects it is clear that the resolution is not at all sufficient and consequently unusable. So I tried to drastically reduce the size of the images like 2000 pixels on the long side, in this case the AI works perfectly with any type of image.
So I wanted to know what the exact resolution limit of the Photoshop Beta AI was.
1024 x 1024 in Beta
@@glyndewis Hi, what does this mean exactly? That Photoshop Beta SI only works at 100% quality with 1024x1024 photos? Do we know in the future with the final version at what resolution it will work?
@@AlessandroChiariniphotographer It's in beta. Hardly think Adobe are going to make full-resolution capabilities possible in free beta version. Once it's fully developed, I'd imagine a couple of things: firstly, better resolution. Secondly, you pay for it.
I think we need a way of disclosing the use of AI in our photographs - at least for the time being. There are many viewers of photographs who expect a certain correspondence to a real-world time and place. It depends on the context of where the images are being presented, whether they might be mistaken for verisimilitude or understood as artistic expression.
This line of thinking is self-limiting I believe: do we currently notate our photographs when we have used the clone-tool to remove one stray cigarette butt from the ground? But some would have us do that if we use Photoshop's new feature instead of the clone-tool. A tad silly methinks.
Which of course leads on to the matter of 'acceptable (or not) degree' of manipulation. I'm looking forward to a working, realistic, universally-accepted definition of an acceptable level of generative fill that can be applied to photographs . . . I think I may be waiting for a very, very long time.
Agreed
Agreed, @@DustyDingoPhotos. Manipulating images have been done for decades already, its just that this makes it faster
A decade ago, at one of astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson's lectures, when asked about UFOs, he joked that currently Photoshop probably has a built-in "UFO button" ;) Now we really have it.
Interesting to think about the possibilities and scary at the same time
@6:53min what type of Camera are you using ???