PAUL MCCARTNEY REFLECTS ON HIS BEEF WITH YOKO OVER THE BEATLES SPLIT- GEN Z GIRL REACTS
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024
- PAUL MCCARTNEY REFLECTS ON HIS BEEF WITH YOKO OVER THE BEATLES SPLIT- GEN Z GIRL REACTS
Join the patreon for exclusive content :
/ itsprincess
Check out my latest video : • GEN Z GIRL LISTENS TO ...
Backup channel :
youtube.com/@P...
If you want to donate to the channel : www.paypal.me/...
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement #beatles #thebeatlesgetback #thebeatles #reaction #reactionvideo
GEN Z GIRL REACTS TO THE BEATLES/GEN Z GIRL REACTS TO AC/DC -THUNDERSTRUCK REACTION - ตลก
Love your reactions Princess. Love to see you do a reaction to James Corden's Carpool Karaoke that he did with Paul McCartney a few years ago. They visit Paul's childhood home which is now a museum. Pretty sure that you will love it. Paul takes James on a tour through Liverpool, and plays a secret gig at a local pub. The patrons are in complete shock as Paul runs through a set of Beatles classics with his band.
The best thing for you to pick up, I feel, is Paul's behaviour towards Yoko over time, as opposed to the Yoko haters, who in my experience only seem to have appeared over the last 25 yrs. I grew up with them during the 1960s and never came across any haters of Yoko then, probably because at the time people were getting into the meaning of peace and love, influenced by The Beatles. The real importance of The Beatles was their message: LOVE.
Enjoying the reactions, if you need more beatles stuff to react to I think the studio bloopers or funny interview compilations would be entertaining
Yoko did not 'break up' or 'ruin' The Beatles. Lennon wanted her to be there. He could have said: "sorry, love, we don't take our girlfriends or wives to the studio." He didn't say that, because he wanted her to be with him all the time. Lennon has stated this in various interviews.
There is a lot of hatred towards Yoko Ono among Beatles fans. I think it's a pity and I think it's not fair. It was John Lennon who dated her, loved her and supported her. Despite all the troubles they went through. Until death did them part.
Yoko didn't break them up, they were already disintegrating. Her presence simply fanned flames that were already there. Ringo actually left first but came back, and then George left and came back. The last straw for John was finding out that Paul was already working on a solo album. John soon announced their break-up
I’m so glad you’re getting in depth with Beatle history. It’s very fascinating and a lot of lore. If there is any music act to learn about, it’s these guys. Always love your channel 😉
Also, a funny Easter egg is that the boys were writing “diss songs” to each other in their solo career, mostly John and Paul, which I think it’s pretty funny. In one song in particular where he not so subtly disses Paul, John recruited George as well on guitar, ouch.
"The Beatles split up because Yoko sat on an amp" 😆
-Paul McCartney
I love your accent! And your reactions :)
Cheers, from Canada!
Thanks! 😃
She also ate one of George’s biscuits!
For once you never asked who the Beatles were !!! , Praise the Lord 🙌 .
Yoko ran all of John's business during the last 10 or so years of their lives together.
John was a hopeless business person. Yoko was like 7 years older than him, and in a lot of ways was far better grounded than he was as a person.
Lets not get on the "love Yoko" train here - yes Lennon let her in the studio, should he have? No! Nobody brings their spouses to work, then allow their spouses to dictate the work. Did that break up The Beatles? No. The break up was a melting pot of reasons, but Yoko was one of them. About Yoko, she is a Kunt, an a$$hole, heartless manipulative bully. Nobody in Hollywood speaks good of her. Yoko's treatment to Julian is sick, especially when Lennon died. And she constantly controlled and cheated on Lennon - but like a wimp, Lennon went running back. Yoko is a devil women, who could have stood to be more appreciative, thoughtful, and loving.
First off. I want to address a comment that someone else wrote that. I know that you read because you gave it a heart. That comment was from somebody who had a little bit of general knowledge but had at least 3 major misconceptions that are absolutely untrue. The biggest misconception happens to be about The Beatles being racist because of Yoko. Absolutely. Absurd of all the groups that were around at the time, and especially in England that Beatles were maybe the least racist. It never was an issue, never brought up. So that person decided in their own mind and they happen to be incorrect. She's also incorrect regarding George Harrison because George was writing songs from the very beginning, just like John and Paul. Yes, they used less of them, but he did not start writing songs after The Beatles were well established, so once again that commenter was incorrect. And lastly, if you watch about a dozen different interviews with Paul McCartney, you will learn that. In fact, Yoko was a huge reason for their break up, as opposed to the way that commenter tried to make it seem. It just bugged me reading that. Comment from that are because I know The Beatles intimately. I'm 76 years old and I was involved and I knew step-by-step year by year what happened.
If you want to understand the Break up, react to “why did the Beatles break up” video, by James Maharaj.
Don't believe everything you see & read. The Beatles broke up the Beatles. There was too much ego & talent within the band. At first it was Lennon & McCartney who wrote & sang the majority of the songs. Then George started writing midway through, then Ringo started writing towards the end. There was not enough room in their albums to satisfy everyone. They usually gave George one or two songs to sing, and one for Ringo in the early days, but once George had gotten better at songwriting, he was frustrated that Lennon & McCartney did not pay attention to his songs and would not give him more space on the albums. Paul then got bossy and wanted his songs how he wanted them; he wouldn't accept input from the others, and they were no longer collaborations. They all needed to do their own solo albums. Yoko was blamed, because she was not what fans thought would be a partner to a Beatle. She was not white! Most of it was racial prejudice and bigotry.
I'm 76 years old and I was in my prime ages when the bagels are out there. And the first thing you were wrong about is George Harrison and I don't mean because he wrote less songs, but he did not start writing songs in the middle. George was writing songs just like both Paul and John in the very beginning. In retrospect, many experts consider George equal to both John and Paul and some believe he actually wrote better songs than either of them. I don't I just think all 3 of them were equally talented. But you shouldn't infer that he didn't start becoming a good song writer until they were well on their way. Because that's not true. But that's not what pissed me off about your comment. You are so wrong and so out of line to bring racism into the issue because it was not an issue and england as opposed to america was never as racist as our country. And that doesn't matter what does matter. Is the fact that racism didn't have one eye odor of the reasoning for them breaking up.
There's no less than a dozen videos out there. With Paul McCartney being interviewed and that includes interviews early on after they broke up when the wound was still sore. Paul has stated on multiple occasions. That Yoko was the greater part of the basis of their breaking up along with a couple of the other things that you happened to mention. But.
Yoko was actually with John for the last 2 whole years of their relationship and she absolutely was an issue and it has less to do with not liking her and more to do that. She spent every waking moment at the studio because of John, allowing her to do so. Which put a crimp in their usual style of song writing. Most.
Of what you said in the middle of your comment is generally correct. But you are really wrong on 3 different fronts.
I was in college at that time. Nothing then or in the years since have I read that had any evidence that racism was a factor.
@@bradjenkins1475thank you for correcting the comment
Indeed, you can see George's frustration in the Get Back recordings. Yoko was also blamed because she was a woman. The footage also shows the wives and children of the other Beatles there in the recording studio with them but instead its always Yoko who takes the blame. And that footage shows that for the most part during the sessions she kept to herself barely saying anything to anybody.
Great video. More Beatles. More Paul. More John. Ect..
Eh, not really though. Yoko didn't help. But there were many other issues. and the truth is that it was PAUL who was in a different headspace than the other three. Evidence; the other three collabed right away on their solo albums. Paul did not. Paul really needed to go solo. I so wish the others would have grabbed their old pal Kluass (sp?) from Germany (who played a MEAN bass guitar), and just continued along.
That's just fantasy. The Beatles were John, Paul, George and Ringo. It would not have been the Beatles if they replaced John with anyone. And they all knew that too.
@@glass2467 Now you're switching to when John was murdered? What about Clapton? No good? Of course it wouldn't have been exactly the same.
@@88pjtink Who said anything about the murder? No, the 4 Beatles together were the Beatles. Anyone else would make it something else. And any of the Beatles members would never have called it the Beatles either. Simple. You see those 4 became so iconic and each of their musical contributions and personalities became part of the required ingredients for The Beatles.
@@glass2467 Beacuse you said that JOHN couldn't be replaced, so I thought you were talking about 1980.
The comments about Yoko smack of xenophobia and misogyny. Even still today. Beatles broke up primarily from business and artistic differences. Similar to most bands. They had a good run compared to Cream and many other famous bands of the era.
So not because of racism but rather the simple fact that she was continuously for 2 full years, almost every single day in the studio, because John was so in love, he wanted her there and 2 years of having a fifth person having so much influence obviously would upset the rest of the band members and when they say she. Ruined The Beatles or caused their breakup. It's just a statement that her presence just became unbearable to the other 3 and more specifically obviously to Paul. There was no one singular reason for the breakup, but Yoko carries the weight of being the main transgressor.
Watch the footage dude. Yoko mostly sits there knitting and when she does speak, she's saying something to Linda Eastman. What you say? The other wives were there too? Yes. And their kids too sometimes.
@@mikecaetano
I appreciate the fact that you're making a comment. But you are still wrong. You say things that are partly correct, like the other Beatles had wise there. We're talking about 2 years or so. Which amounts to about 700 days and you saw a couple of videos that on a couple of occasions, you noticed that she was in the background knitting. How does that answer the statement that? I made that she was there every day continuously. In her presence as it should have caused nothing but irritation. Because the guys wanted to be there and have their wise. Come by occasionally or stop in but not come and spend the full 12 hours there. And?
Every day, 12 hours a day. Yeah, that isn't irritant. Whether you want to admit it or not because she wasn't budding in or telling them what they should or shouldn't do. It was her presence as I originally stated so don't miss quote me. The fact is simple. Had Yoko combined Kaylee or spend some time or had certain days that maybe she came by and wanted to see how the process was going, but not camping out there. And doing the things you could do at home and doing them there. No question that if she had occasionally or even fairly often come in to the studio, there would not have been the irritant. And I'll tell you what I know if I was a member of a band and one of the other guys, continually had his female love spending every moment. Well, try taking a look at probably every group from Led Zeppelin to Queen and tell me that any one of them had a wife and that wife stayed there every moment of the day when they were in the studio.
John could never stand up to Yoko. IMO she had no business in the recording studio with everyone esle.
Might as well say love ended The Beatles. Macho man Paul didn't like having another woman than Linda around. An unspoken rule is not a rule.