Rolex Submariner 16610 LV and Omega Seamaster Professional 300M video comparison 4K
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
- Video comparison of legendary diving watches: Rolex Submariner 16610 LV "Kermit" and Omega Seamaster 300 M co-axial chronometer 212.30.41.20.01.003 in 4K
Please subscribe for more videos like this!
My new photography and filmmaking channel: / @thehybridshooter
Instagram: / spartans_watches
My other videos:
TAG Heuer Aquracer Calibre 5 WAY211A.FT6068 Part 2 4K
• TAG Heuer Aquracer Cal...
Lume comparison: Rolex, Omega, TAG Heuer, Sieko, Damasko, Biatec, Tisell 4K
• Lume comparison: Rolex...
Rolex Submariner 16610 LV: The Kermit 4K
• Rolex Submariner 16610...
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 150M: The Golfer 4K
• Omega Seamaster Aqua T...
Omega Semaster 300m and Seiko SXK009: 4 000$ watch compared to 200$ watch 4K
• Omega Seamaster 300m a...
Damasko DA38 black: Flying Under the Radar 4K
• Damasko DA38 black: F...
BIatec Corsair 01: Pilot's watch made in Slovakia 4K
• BIatec Corsair 01: Pil...
TAG Heuer Aquaracer Calibre 5 WAY2110.FT8021 - master of versatility 4K
• TAG Heuer Aquaracer Ca...
Seiko SKX009 K2: the watch with real character
• Seiko SKX009 K2: the w...
Strapcode Super Jubilee bracelet for SKX007 / 009: make your SKX complete 4K
• Strapcode Super Jubile...
Omega Seamaster 300 M and TAG Heuer Aquaracer 300M - comparison video
• Omega Seamaster 300 M ...
Omega Seamaster 300m ceramic 212.30.41.20.01.003 watch review
• Omega Seamaster 300m c...
TAG Heuer Aquaracer Calibre 5 WAY211A.FT6068
• TAG Heuer Aquaracer Ca...
Music: NCM Epic Music
• Video
/ @enderguney
*Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch* Review 2018: bit.ly/OmegaSpeedmasterReview
How many chanels you have? Photo, Watches...💪👍
That Omega is stunning still one of the best looking dive watches ever.
I absolutely agree, thanks for commenting!
I purchased the Omega Sea Master 300 a couple years ago. Definitely on par with the Rolex Submariner. No regrets.
The problem with owning a Rolex is that beside you and probably the people who knows you, everyone else would probably think that you own a fake watch. Other than that, the Omega just looks way more better than the Rolex with it being much cheaper. I don't see any reason on spending your money on a Rolex..
A Y the exact reason I would buy an omega over a Rolex
Resale value. I think the Rolex has a better resale value (cmiiw).
If youre buying something because you care what others think of you or want to impress other people then you need to get your life in order. With that being said both watches are great. In my personal opinion, the Omega at half the price is a good value.
I have just received the Seamaster in Blue Dial..love it so much
Congratulations, enjoy your new Seamaster!
Thank you for watching!
Thanks for a nice and clear video. Yes i am enjoy the watch every day. Even it's on my wrist, i can't keep my eyes off it :) love every thing on this watch. Thank you again.
+Young Doan You're welcome, thank you for watching.
I have had my Seamaster for almost 14 years and never serviced. Still enjoy it especially when people recognize I am wearing Omega. Will never sell but eventually will add to my collection.
flakeyjay It's probably a good idea to get it serviced even if it is still running great. Especially if it is a watch you want to keep in your collection for the duration.
Hey. Sounds good, i just bought the seamaster used from 2018.
How long do u think it will run before the service i neccecary ? :) can any watchmechanic serve it ? Or only someone that knows omega ?
Ordering my Omega Seamaster diver 300m tomorrow.
Good choice!
The non wave dual Omega divers are increasing in price now as they're unique to the line
Yes but not as much as the wave dial versions.
PEOPLE ALWAYS SAY-
But the resale value is better on the Rolex.
I SAY-
You buy an Omega for life. You don’t think about selling it.
So who cares about resale value ?
Makes sense.
A Seamaster and a Speedy ??? Not likely, not new anyway.
I actually I have a Speedmaster sapphire sandwich incoming, and I paid much less for the Seamaster and Speedmaster together that I would for Submariner (all new watches of course).
I have paid 2700€ for the Seamaster, and 3625€ for speedmaster shpphire sandwich, 6 325€ togeather, Submariner no-date costs from 6 950€ in EU. Submariner is incredibly overpriced at the moment IMO.
A new SeaMaster P.O. is 8500 bucks in the states on the Omega site. Jomashop has them in the 4500 to 5200 range.
personally the Omega looks more Premium. i know there is a age difference, but it looks so much better voor half the price
Yaaaaaaa
love the omega seamaster 300
So do I, thanks for watching and commenting!
The Seamaster looks a lot better.
Thanks for sharing your opinion and for watching!
on these vids yes, mostly because of lack of AR on rolex. But on natural light the rolex looks better as the camera lighting doesn't haze the crystal.
OnlineBackupServices Keep in mind that during the day you can be exposed to high light. AR helps a lot. And without ligh/refletions on both rolex shows its beauty. But each one has his. Would be a better comparation if it was the all black sub. Each has his beauty. I love the no date sub version. Anyway i do like the reflection on a crystal and helps the cyclope on a sub date to stand out more than it was AR. Keep in mind that since 2005 the rolex watches have AR.
In terms of design, the Seamaster beats the Sub! Bezel design looks sleek and not too typical
Great comparison, I just bought the Seamaster diver 300 chronograph. I like the Seamaster MUCH better than the Submariner. But I am an Omega man and never really liked Rolexes..
Congratulations on your acquisition, I'm Omega man as well, but I also like some Rolex models.
Funny, the Rolex cost twice as much, but looks like it should cost the half of the Omega.
And this is also true with the older Seamaster with wave dial.
Well, since you can´t buy it new , price is determined by demand, and there is a lot of Rolex enthusiasts willing to pay that much, so the price is more about desire of Rolex collectors rather than the watch as a physical object. But I have to admit that in my opinion Omega provides generally much better value (if we don´t account for resale price).
This Rolex now costs more than twice as much.
Georgie Bungle The RRP of the Seamaster is £2920.
The Rolex shown in this video does not go into the "Rolex now" category. That's dishonest.
I just bought the Omega SMPc, made me happier than buying my Rolex explorer 1, which i also love. Omega has something different, and it wipes any Submariner or any diver watch honestly, elegance, beauty, value for money
I have the Seamaster professional 300 and its so awesome! I love this watch🙌🏻
The AR coating on the Omega crystal makes a HUGE difference.
I just purchased the Omega Seamaster with black dial and agree with all of your comments. It is a gorgeous watch. It seems its cost is climbing if you want a new one with not much of a difference in price between this watch and the new seamaster.
Very likely getting the Omega soon. Thank you for this excellent video :) I feel very well informed.
Thank you Bear, I hope that Omega will serve you well in many survival situations :)
Love the sea master
Just bought the Omega, shipping from Switzerland now! Soo excited!
Omega all the way ! Such a class!
An innovative brand with an amazing history since 1848.
Rolex is just a name for people who want to throw more thousands for no purpose.
I much prefer the Seamaster it's my dream watch.Unfortunately i haven't got a pot to piss in so it will stay a dream.HAHA Great video though.
Well, you never know... a couple of years ago it was just a dream from as well. Thanks for watching!
no man !! save some money as you can get a great seamaster for not that much money .... dont give up a dream.
You can’t afford $1,000 for a used Omega Seamaster? Stop wasting money for a year. No fast food breakfasts or $5 coffees. You can afford one if you have discipline.
@@easyeagle3730 im doing that since i am 16. I am 24 now, ride a brand new honda fireblade and have to make the decision submariner or seamaster. I always wonder about people telling me they got no money but smoke cigs for 8 euros a day😂
Uh. Can you tell me where I can buy a used Omega for 1500 or a used Rolex for 5K? Because I am seeing 2000-2500 plus for the Omegas and 6-7k plus for the Subs.
Omega seamaster is an iconic watch , it's good enough for James Bond & prince William anyway
I'm wearing the Omega Seamaster 300M since seven years. It's just a great watch. I still love this watch overall. This watch is fantastic. Elegant, sporty and classic. Best daily use watch I ever had! And the best of all is because of it's water resistants the watch is always washable with a toothbrush. The Rolex Sub was always my dream watch. Maybe one day I will get it..if I can cheat on my Omega.
Pedigree apart , omega looks sporty and well finished !
have both and omega wins !! no hesitation on that ... the omega actually can take 3 times the depth and survive the punishment with no problem. both are great but the omega is nicer and technologically better ...........
Own both but Omega is my go to.
domed sapphire on omega makes a huge difference in reflection. it makes so much clearer dial.
It is actually the anti-reflective coating that makes the difference.
not that much. antireflective coating just colors the reflection making it darker. it's the domed shape that basically prevents the reflection at all. because of the domed shape reflection is magnified (reflection is smaller actually), meaning much less light is reflected. it's just physics. that's why the domed glass is so much better.
I don't think so, domed crystal certainly helps, but comparing it to other domed crystals I would say that double AR makes most of the difference.
Fantastic comparison. Congrats on such a great video.
Thank you!
I like the submariner, but it's design has been replicated so many times that it appears a bit boring.
I think the non wave coax ceramic version is unique amongst the range
Very entertaining comparison!!
Thanks!
Omega, Omega.
Omega wins on every point. I own one and its GREAT.
Love that you called out the crown action on the Omega. From the beginning of my watch collecting journey, I quickly realised that Omega crowns are incredibly solid, and yes as everyone says, buttery smooth!
Thanks, I always thy to focus on these small, but important details, Omega crowns are really great. Thanks for watching and commenting.
I liked this so much I ordered one. ( The Omega 300 Pro)I even had them promise over night delivery!
Glad to hear that, I'm sure that you won't be disappointed. Thanks for watching and commenting!
how do you like it?
will not be dissapointed !!!!!!
Rolex are very good pieces ... no doubt about it ... but i am omega inclined customer .....
I just ordered the same seamaster pro. So excited!!
This is a brilliant, articulate and knowledgeable review/comparison. Also delighted to hear that whilst acknowledging the pedigree of Rolex you made a very objective and rational decision when voting the Omega over the Rolex which many Rolex fanboys would not have done even though they know the Omega is the better watch. Respect. Well done you Sir! ATB
Thank you, I appreciate your feedback!
great video. i love my seamaster and wouldn't swap it for that horrible looking green rolex, no way!!.
Thank you!
Excellent video, many thanks
I´m glad that you like it, thank you for watching!
I'll sum up this video...Rolex is good, Omega is better...
I'll sum up my opinion...Omega is good, but Rolex is better. This is a much older Rolex Sub,, and has gone through upgrades since. Rolex is completely in house, has superior resale, and I love the brushed 904l steel, for its durability and longevity. I do love the the Omega Seamaster 300, but that helium valve ruins the look some.
Is that Rolex Submarine Date 116610 have an anti magnetic like Omega Seamaster Profesional did ?
Great comparison. Just bought a Seamaster today!
Love the Omega, the green on that Rolex looks cartoonish and children’s painted room like!
I just bought the 2018 300M
Me too today!
Just bought the sea master 300, Am getting it tomorrow and i cant wait dude! yeeeeass
Omega for sure.
This was a very fair and objective review. Excellent, and matches my experience, too. Both amazing watches.
I owned the Rolex Explorer 11. Poor time keeping even after adjustment by Rolex. I now have the 300m ceramic and it betters the Rolex in every way. Comfort, accuracy and in my opinion, looks. The positive bit for the Rolex is that I sold it for £600 more than I paid for it after eight years of ownership. Just my honest view and ownership experience. Oh and by the way the Omega loses a second a day, compared to the Rolex which lost two minutes a day. Not bad for a watch which was half the price eh?
When I bought my Seamaster I was choosing between it and the Rolex. I have the 'old' wave pattern blue dial, and it was no contest for me, and the price wasn't even involved, though the Rolex was somewhere close to twice the price. Not quite I don't think, but it was more than two grand more than the $3100 I paid for my Omega.
I prefer wave dial Seamaster as well, I would definitely like to add one to my collection in the future.
Why spending twice as much for the Rolex? Why???
Well, it is Rolex, it is relatively rare and a lot of collectors want this watch... It would be difficult to rationally justify the price, it is more about the desire of collectors to own this watch.
Thanks for watching and commenting!
hour hand and minute hand of the rolex look way better IMO, can't stand the ones that the omega has unfortunately. reminds me of an watch at the train station.
it keeps its value, look at the used prices of the LVs now. they are going nuts.
@benvolio mozart the seamaster is around 3000 - 3500 euro. The Rolex is at least double that maybe more.
Its amazing the dollars a name (Rolex) can command! The SM is clearly the better looking timepiece, top to bottom, respectfully. Having said that, as you mention, Rolex innards are as legendary as legendary can be. But lets face it, you buy a Rolex as a status symbol, or at the very least, just the thrill of owning a Rolex. I'm not in the Rolex league yet, but I can make an Omega happen, which is whats happening as we speak! Great review, very very informative.
Very nicely done comparison video! Your production values are top-notch.
I keep debating with myself whether to get the Seamaster 300 or step up a bit in price and get the Planet Ocean. The smaller size of the 300 will probably make it more versatile, but the the skeleton hands are not as appealing to me aesthetically as the arrow hands of the Planet Ocean. On any given day I can talk myself into one watch or the other. The I get tired of thinking about it and go wear my SKX007 and put it off for another day. Such is the life of a watch enthusiast.
I bought the 45.5 mm version of the Planet Ocean that was made a few years ago. I'm a pretty big guy, but it was just too big and heavy. Mostly too thick. I felt like if I wore that watch as my daily use watch, I'd probably damage it--either by scraping it against something or banging it, or maybe even dropping it when I was putting it on or taking it off. I returned it and got the Seamaster Professional 300M instead.. I think the newest, 43.5 mm version of the Planet Ocean is much nicer than the larger, older one, and I may get that one in the future, maybe in a couple of years. It's significantly more expensive, but it has the completely antimagnetic movement (and 60-hour reserve). The Planet Oceans are also water resistant to 2000 meters instead of 1000, but I doubt that's of use to anyone--certainly not to me.
That's very helpful information. Thank you!
Thank you, I always try my best.
I was deciding between 300M and PO as well, I went with 300M, because of the proportions, and with that lacquered dial and ceramic bezel I found it to be the best blend between tool watch and kind of blingy, eye catching looks. But I also like the newest 43,5mm PO, especially the blue one on the bracelet, I might get one in the future.
Thank you, Spartan. Both your and highnrising's comments have focused my attention away from the Planet Ocean and towards the 300. Interestingly enough, the TAG Heuer Aquaracer WAY211 has also been on my short list and your review of that also weighs heavily in my decision process.
I definitely encourage you to take a look in person at all of the watches that you are considering, and also take a look at Breitling SuperOcean II 42mm, Tudor Black Bay and new Breitling SuperOcean Heritage II with ceramic bezel and in-house Tudor movement.
Great video
Thank you!
Omega FTW. Omega is worn by the hustlers and havers of the world, and Rolex by the hustled and had.
Is the omega black dialed or blue?
It is black version.
Got my order in for the SMPc!
What camera do u use ?
In this video I used Panasonic G85 amzn.to/2n834wx but now I mostly use Sony A7 III amzn.to/2F3LZid
what is the part number for the adjustable clasp?
117STZ001154
Without question Omega makes a better watch. Anyone who says differently is a shill for Rolex. I wore a Seamaster for 17 years. Only the newest Rolex line beats Omega. I wear a Rolex GMT II BLNR. It’s great. Finally Rolex makes a quality solid link band and locking clasp.
Nice video.
I just bought the 2016 Rio Olympics version of the Seamaster, brand new.
As far as I can tell, it's exactly the same as the watch that you review here except for 3 features: The Olympic edition has a bezel with multi-colored numbers; it has a wavy black dial; and the case back has the Rio Olympic games symbol and limited edition number instead of the "Seamonster" logo. I think that inside, they're the same. I like the splash of color on the bezel and the wave dial. I kind of wish they had kept the Seamonster symbol on the back and added a small Olympic logo, rather than eliminate the Seamonster entirely.I like that it has no Olympic logos on the front, so it's understated. I hope the special edition watch holds its value (or even gains value) in the future.
I just had two links taken out of the bracelet to size it to my wrist, but it's a tiny bit tighter than I would like. I feel like if I wear it all day and am active, it's probably going to leave track marks on my wrist. I don't care all that much about the marks, but I feel like that also means that perspiration and dirt will be going directly into the band. I'm intrigued that you were able to transfer an Omega clasp with a microadjustment feature to the watch. I think I'd like to do that. Are those clasps easily available? And they'll fit on the original bracelet? Thanks.
I like the Olympic version as well, especially the dial and I would like to see non special edition 300M with waves on the dial. Inside they are indeed the same.
Regarding the clasp, I definitely recommend it. The clasp fits the stock bracelet without any modifications, it is "plug and play", availability should be fine, I just heard that they might refuse to sell it in some Omega Boutiques, but any Authorized Dealer should be able to order it for you, just ask for part number 117STZ001154 it should be about 140$ or €.
Thanks for watching and commenting!
The waves on the limited edition dial are actually part of the Olympic design. Omega describes the wave pattern as being emblematic of the wavy sand on the beaches of Rio. So they wouldn't use that face on any other edition of the watch. (Though they could conceivably bring back a more generic wave pattern, like what was on the original 1990s edition of this watch.) What I like about the Rio edition watch is that the special design elements on the front--the colored numbers on the bezel and the wave pattern stand on their own as worthwhile features. They don't call attention to themselves as promotional (like, say, the "007" marks on the dial or second-hand of some of the Omega "James Bond" special editions, which some watch connoisseurs actually see as lacking class). The more promotional Olympic markings are on the back--so they're there to show anyone who's interested, but they're not seen in normal wear.
Yes, I know that it is a pattern used on a certain square in Rio, I haven´t seen it for myself, but I hope that I will visit Rio this year.
But it definitely reminds me of 90´s wave dial Seamasters, and I would like to see the waves return to Seamaster 300M.
Great video, thanks! :)
Thank you!
Why rolex has enlarging glass, it looks like a wicked wart.
You'll understand it very soon, I assure you. :D
Im looking at these as well to own,the Rolex is all brand status,no way is it worth double
this omega always pisses on everything, been trying to get a new condition one for awhile now and finally got one.
Rolex appeals to everyone, omega appeals to those know about watches... Tough call
OMEGA FOR THE WIN!!! ALWAYS!!!!!
Excellent review. Just picked up the Seamaster you reviewed in this video and love it. You mentioned that you swapped out the clasp for a micro-adjustment one. Can you provide more info on this? Thanks and keep up the great work.
Thanks, clasp is part number 117STZ001159 it costs about 140€/$ and it is plug & play.
Omega get my vote.
I have both of these references and the Omega wins on every count (not the version just unveiled at Baselworld 2018, which is terrible). Interestingly as well, my Omega gains just 0.3 seconds per day as well, regardless of whether it is worn at night or rested in any position, whereas the sub gains 2-4, depending on how it is worn.
I have mixed opinion about the new Seamaster, I hope that it will look better in real life.
Great review, thanks ! Have the black Seamaster with "sword" hands and "stick" hour marks. Fantastic design. The preceramic Rolex Submariner looks equal because it has no date (which I prefer) but the price is too high for a diver. So I did not buy a Submariner but bought the Rolex Milgauss, which looks more "Rolex" and offers a different type of nice, no-date sportswatch in addition to my Seamaster sword hands.
Thank you, I do like those older Seamsters as well, I hope to get one in the future.
I like the omega much better. It's a shame rolex refuses to use Anti Reflective coatings.
I want that Omega!!
Great review!
Thanks!
Got the Omega the better watch
Very good video!
+Gustav Lindbäck Thanks!
Funny how anti-reflective coating makes a watch looks twice its worth. One of the 2 things I totally dislike about Rolex..lack of AR coating and their bracelets are sub par for watch thats $5k. And this is where Omega easily steals the show.
That's right, I also miss the AR on Rolex.
But would you get the Kermit over the original black submariner?
Ahh these omegas ❤️
Obviously rolly is nice too
Ambos son espectaculares. Ese ranita es mi sueño!
I just received my Omega Seamaster 300m Diver and the first thing I noticed about the bezel is that appears to be loose as in, if I tap it (mainly the top right side) there is a clicking. If I tap on the bottom left there is no clicking. As far as turning the bezel it is solid, but it just seems loose if I tap on it. Has anyone else had that experience?
Mine doesn't do that.
Where is the laser engraving inside the rolex?
Both are so beautiful
omega is better
I have seen the seamaster online for just over $2,700 USD the watch retails for $4,400... I know these watch sites are collectively referred to as the "gray market" ... what does that mean and is the seamaster they are offering at 2,700 the real deal . I love this watch and plan Buy it.
Grey market means that they are not official seller approved by the brand and they source watches elsewhere, it usually is the real deal if the sell is reputable.
Spartans Watch Reviews thank you for response,.
Omega looks better in this video.
If only omega had a more adjustable clasp. This half an inch driver extension is simply useless in real life. Still going to buy it this summer though
They actually do have more adjustable clasp 117STZ001159 with both micro-adjustments and divers extension. For me, regular adjustable clasp is more than sufficient, I only use 2 or 3 of those positions.
Spartans Watch Reviews i just added the micro adjustable clasp on my Seamaster 300m. It cost me around $120. It is amazing but i say it should come standard on the watch. It is my only gripe on the otherwise excellent Omega Seamaster 300m 2500.
Omega Seamaster for diving watches and Rolex Daytona for chronograph watches
Just beatiful
Thank you ,Arturo!
Do people ever put aftermarket AR coated crystals into Rolexes, or would that be sacrilege?
The 5 link bracelet should be confortable.
Team Omega!
kermit for me please
Amazing quality video, but please use some moisturizer :P
Thanks, that is mechanical skin damage from deadlifts, unfortunately nothing helps with that, sorry about that.
Omega gonna be the new rolex.
I walked into an Omega A.D. on Friday and the blue and black seamasters caught my eye even though I own a 2599.80. I might add to my collection in the future but I'm after a planet ocean next and need to wait bcz, I bought some other watch 1 week ago and it hurt the wallet.
You didn't say lug to lug ?
다른곳 댓글보고 타고들어왔는데요
곧결혼하는 남친한테 선물하려는데 2.300대에서 괜찮은 시계추천해주실거있을까요?
why is there such a glare on the Rolex crystal?