🔵Increasing The Negative Resistant Output Even Further For Optimization Of Battery Super Charging🔋

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • LINK TO FREE SCHEMATICS & GUIDES ON PATREON AS WELL AS OUR SHOP
    www.patreon.co...
    Link To Researcher That Successfully Replicated The Circuit With Step By Step Guide
    • The Ringer in Small St...
    Greetings Everybody in this video I focus on really increasing the power output of the negative resistance ringer circuit model that's used in the generator boards to rapidly recharge batteries or super capacitors. Once charged we can then run a 120/240vac inverter for a time to power whatever we desire. This circuits capabilities really shine with its ability to rapidly recharge DC storage devices.
    The theory behind how this system works is relatively straightforward. We constructed a super joule ringer 3.0 circuit first invented by laser hacker/saber on a type 77 metglas laced ferrite rod & instead of using the high frequency power output directly we put the output into a variable negative resistant RLC network with a cold cathode neon bulb. Heavily earth grounding this closed negative resistant RLC circuit through an additional cold cathode neon bulb creates even more non linear effects & enhancements within the system. Next we wound a resonant yellow 18 awg stranded high quality coil per tesla patent 336,961 as a wireless magnetic resonant pickup coil over the negative resistant RLC circuitry to allow us to tap into the wireless power while having minimal effect on our input. Maintaining resonance in this system is very important for the power output of this system. The exotic effects we're after & looking to maintain are the negative resistance effect, the decoupling of cause from effect & the rapid recharging effect from high frequency resonance via the yellow coil. A good indication of achieving these effects is when the output of the wireless yellow coil is shorted your input power will drop.
    The system is phenomenal at very rapidly recharging batteries & super capacitors to run inverters or loads & this system will very rapidly recharge dead batteries of all types too & the batteries generate a good amount of heat too when they're being rapidly recharged from the system & rapidly discharged from the inverter. The newer the battery technology the better in theory. Also earth grounding the negative resistant RLC circuit creates very phenomenal wireless power effects at no input drain to our source.

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @quantumenergysolutions9128
    @quantumenergysolutions9128 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Mate have you seen the Fractal Capacitor array that transforms and rectifies at 94% efficiency? And can do HV to LV or Lv to HV and its your storage bank! Im sure you would know how to apply it best. See Robert Murray Smith's Extended video on Fractal Capacitors. Imagine each of the equal regular capacitors could be swapped with a big CapBat. Robert published the free digital files for the A4 sized boards.

  • @anthonyjousse3020
    @anthonyjousse3020 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Mtech great workkk ❤but you burn the gaz into néon its Bad ... Your néon dont burn ... Normally add more néon. ...❤❤❤❤❤

  • @MMPowerCafe
    @MMPowerCafe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That answers my question about the wireless receiver, the more resisters in parallel the better.
    Now wondering if you have determined what makes that special neon bulb more efficient? And, like the resisters, is there a benefit from connecting more in parallel or serial?

    • @MTECHINDUSTRIES2022
      @MTECHINDUSTRIES2022  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @MMPowerCafe so far the system seems to be maxed out with the three parallel resistors & 1-2 neons work great for reducing power consumption while simultaneously increasing the strength of the oscillations but too many in parallel will actually draw excess power from the circuitry :)

  • @arunbirla9053
    @arunbirla9053 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can the ringer be made on a nano toroidal core instead of the metglas ferrite rod ??

  • @drasko5538
    @drasko5538 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    use avramenko circuit with 2 diodes(schottky) to charge batteries with one wire without loading the circuit down.

  • @zenpeak_original
    @zenpeak_original 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The ZVS circuit is similar, relax! The zero voltage circuit! :))

  • @zenpeak_original
    @zenpeak_original 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I will shre, your video on my Facebook chanell, to get more audiance. :)

  • @nsmtbkid
    @nsmtbkid 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Checking your provided schematics in the PDF from your patreon page the earth connects directly between the carbon resistor and L2 coil, then, that joint basically is connected to the emitter of the transistor trough the cold cathode neon bulb however now the earth is connected through the neon bulb between the resistor and L2. Can you explain why? What is the difference? I'm also confused about L1 or L2 is the primary coil? The diagram shows as L1 (26awg) is the primary but the pictures show that it is connected as secondary (between base and collector with the carbon resistor in series).

    • @MTECHINDUSTRIES2022
      @MTECHINDUSTRIES2022  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Much more updated pdf construction guide coming within 2 weeks :)

  • @ericlomtier2418
    @ericlomtier2418 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey thank s for sharing how come your input has gone so high ?

    • @MTECHINDUSTRIES2022
      @MTECHINDUSTRIES2022  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Was seeing how far i can push the system with the theorized negative resistance for rapid charging & discharging of batteries

  • @quantumenergysolutions9128
    @quantumenergysolutions9128 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    After you get it tuned to where your satisfied. May I ask if you intent to arrange the system or 2 systems , so the end user can just use and forget,, and it will use either pairs of capbat banks, where they system automatically refills and switches banks? Do you know what I mean?

  • @jensbuchholz5766
    @jensbuchholz5766 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @bitkoinpapa
    @bitkoinpapa 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    if battery have 20 000 cicles charge-discharge lifetime then it means next: 5sec (for full charge-discharge time) * 20 000 = 100 000 sec it is lifetime of battery in the working system. 100 000 sec/60=1666 min/60= 27 hours .......so...after working non-stop system 27hours your battery die and you need a new one. what is price of your battery? 300$ or more ? so. using your system need spend 300$ each 27 hours. I am right or not?

    • @nsmtbkid
      @nsmtbkid 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I guess he already cycled much more, doing his experiments so you're not. :)

    • @MTECHINDUSTRIES2022
      @MTECHINDUSTRIES2022  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Greetings i believe the cycles on mine were advertised as 50-60,000

    • @bitkoinpapa
      @bitkoinpapa 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MTECHINDUSTRIES2022 I have seen the test : supercap 16v 100f is fully discharged by the 12v bulb in 2 min. so, if it charges 3 times faster than we have totally charge-discharge cycle in your working system lest say 3min. If we have 60 000 cycles lifetime battery(supercap) then 3*60000=180000min/60=3000h/24=125d/30=4 month nonstop working system and you need to pay again for new battery. ok. imagine we use 7h/day than we have 12month working battery(supercap). so if the price of battery 50$ /year payment for 40w bulb light. if we compare with usual use we see 40w*7h*365=102200 *0.2$/kwt =21$ . so if we use the system we pay 50$/year (becouse supercap die and need a new) and if we use usual home electroline then we pay 2 times less for the same quantity of received light. Totally conclusion that device is not rentable to use at home but it is good to use outside of line (in the car or in the nature in the trip and so on). the same we have to compare using outside the device or the usual generator to see the benefits. But in total I think your device is very usefull thing