Drug Route in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest | NEJM

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 4

  • @adamliske
    @adamliske 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +10

    Just to add some context to this study:
    The 2.7% and 2.8% survival with neurological status intact outcome intact is a horribly low statistic.
    - It took 21-22 minutes to obtain vascular access from time of dispatch
    - It took 14-15 minutes to obtain vascular access from time of EMS arrival
    - Only 17.1% of the patients who received IOs had a proximal humerus IO placed (the standard of care for cardiac arrest patients) while 73.5% had a proximal tibial IO placed.
    - Almost a third of those assigned to the IV access group received an IO as their first successful vascular access site after two failures with via IV, with a similar breakdown between proximal humerus and proximal tibial locations
    - The IV group had a notably higher rate of shockable rhythms compared to the IO group
    The list of this studies inadequacies goes on and on. I am not sure how this study ever made it to publication, especially in a journal that claims to be as high standard as the NEJM.
    Take away: compression and electricity save lives. vascular access, medications, and airway management are adjuncts.

  • @ShinigamisBlade
    @ShinigamisBlade 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks for these summaries of studies!

  • @waynepalmar6101
    @waynepalmar6101 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Really like this channel

  • @marcoimmunotherapy3737
    @marcoimmunotherapy3737 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you.