Ya right dude.🙄 most people will comply the moment police come to the door demanding them. Most people aren’t ready to die fighting for it and that’s the last issue. The first issue is gun owners unwillingness to protest and call their representatives before saying some edgy shit online
@@user-jd8zl4gv8o- you fail to realize that those of that have called- see those Elected are unwilling to do their Job, So they must be removed- by any means necessary......
damn... you took the phrase I was going to use !! it absolutely would become just that, which may be part of the plan, remember KUMala did actually mention a depopulation agenda.
one or two may happen, but then the 'knock on the door' goes real bad for any cop... local, state, or fed........... I am sure that would absolute start to happen within days of 1st attempt of confiscation
If you cannot see the irony of having a gun ban enforced by men with guns, then you fail to understand why the second amendment was written in the first place.
@@StirlingQShagnasty "The Founding Fathers didn't carry their muskets to the market!" Actually yes, yes they did. They were always strapped. Everyone back then was.
I'm a police officer and I took an oath to uphold and defend the constitution, not politicians. I will NOT assist the federal government, or ANY government agency, including the agency I work for, with violating the constitutional rights of US citizens. When I took the oath, I took it seriously. I haven't violated it at any point throughout my entire 30 year career and I will NOT violate it now, for anyone...period!
@equine2020 To be honest, I don't have the answer for you. I can only be responsible for myself, which includes coaching younger officers of the oath they took as well. Wouldn't be the first time I've called out younger officers if I saw one of them getting out of line or disrespecting a citizen unnecessarily. I take the approach of mentoring them, hoping that when I retire, they'll remember the "lessons" I taught them. Sure, meet aggression with aggression, but don't be the one that escalated it. Deescalation works most (but not all) of the time. I try to set the example, but my lessons only apply to the officers I've worked with or continue to work with. I work for a large agency, and still see officers in my department who I've never met before in 30 years. So needless to say, I've never met 99.999% of the people who were police officers all across the US during my 30 years. So I have no influence on them at all. I can only try to influence those I work with by setting an example of what enforcing the law within the boundaries of the constitution looks like.
Fk it... let's get er done. It's time this country remembers WTF it's here for. IT'S TIME we MAKE THIS FKN GOVERNMENT REMEMBER WHO THEY'RE HERE FOR.Theyre doing nothing but pushing US TOWARDS SUBJUGATION AN SERVITUDE. That's ALL THEY WANT, ONCE deregulation was SIGNED when PEOPLE WERE BREACHING THE GAP OF WEALTH the ROTHCHILDS and OTHER ORIGINAL FAMILIES changed the path of HUMAN FREEDOM.
Not necessarily! I think the big point is, that they can't really do it! Like I said in my post is that the danger is people who think they can! For most of us, we could simply ignore Joe's executive orders! Conceivably, the pistol brace rule could have prosecuted people who bought factory braced pistols or maybe people who posted pictures online! The Yankee Marshal put it best, nothing will happen if you just keep it to yourself!
@@davidcbrainard no matter how well Democrats plan, people are not as predictable as democrat leaders think. Numerous wars throughout history were planned as quick victories but turned into much more.
Already on it my fellow brother God please turn this a way in our favor🙏 and let the evil perish! And sent to the pit retired generals are talking word is spreading fast prepare!!
@@rayhorn7035The IRS has been pretty clear on that. "Voluntary" just means that you have control over how and what you declare on your tax form. But you're still obligated to pay. They phrase it that way because they know only have enough agents to enforce on a fraction of the submissions.
As a retired police officer I can tell you from a logistics standpoint there is no way to collect 330 million firearms. There are roughly 780,000 police officers in the US and 1.3 million military members. Even if 10% of the population said no and fought back against the government, it would last 1 day if they went door to door. When I worked LAPD in the 90’s one patrol division was lucky that they took 100-150 guns off the street a month. Do the math it’s impossible and it will never happen. People will fight back against it with deadly force. Count on it!
I honestly don't think the police or military would do that ( I hope they wouldn't). I fantasize we'd see military and police standing with the citizens. One can dream.
I knew a lot of cops when I lived in LA in the 90s. Before the 92 riots, and the North Hollywood event. Every cop I knew was an awesome role-model, and just plane cool
I could see southerners grouping up and fighting under their own flags. The rest of the country i dont think would. Too much division over here in the west coast. Guess that just means more gotta go!
@@commiehunter733 I know for a fact our Sheriff would. He would likely deputize us all also. Most Local PD would probably follow. The real fight would come against Feds and democrat loyalist local cops.
I don't take the word Civil War lightly, but I honestly think that gun confiscation is one of the very few (if not the ONLY) event that would lead to Civil War.
Apparently you've forgotten about the 30 million illegals they've let in our country? Pretty sure that's going to lead to something people aren't going to like. Oh wait, already has. Like free everything for the fucks that shouldn't even be here
Riots in inner cities would cause truckers to not deliver goods into that city, foraging would occur in sounding areas which would lead to fathers protecting their own families
There's something 5-6 million regular duty and reserve military personnel in the country. Maybe 2-3 million armed law enforcement.And they're going to disarm 275 million gun owners ? It won't be pretty if they try.
I did not take an oath to anyone, but i do have a personal oath to the men and women who came before me and made this country. And I have a duty to make sure their sacrifice was not in vain. And keep America, America!!
"From a historical study of weapons and political dynamics, Carroll Quigley concludes that the characteristics of weapons are the main predictor of democracy. Democracy tends to emerge only when the best weapons available are easy for individuals to buy and use. This explains why democracy occurs so rarely in human history." Carroll Quigley was Clinton's favorite professor in college.
BINGO. Because, judging from past occurrences, if you say "I lost them in a boating accident!', they'll just shoot you on the spot ANYWAY. Hell, they'll probably shoot you on the spot even AFTER you hand them over, or maybe when you go to get them, so... POINT BEING.
@@sdrc92126 if what you mean by democracy is "will of the people" then I hate to break it to you but we don't have a democracy (or even a representative republic, if one wants to quibble over definitions).
It would probably result in the loss of 20% or more of the population. Only a small percentage of the population produces food and most of the population can't get along without electricity.
@@GH-tp6vu agreed. It would be the worst thing that ever happened to our country. If it survived, future generations would hate us for destroying our dominance and squandering our resources.
@@brianhusted3909 I think 20% is a very conservative minimum number. I’d be willing to bet that around one third of our population would be decimated. It would be more devastating than both world wars combined.
I guarantee you that the vast majority of police officers would say, “Oh hell no! Are you crazy?” after being told to go door to door and confiscate firearms from citizens. They value their lives more than their paychecks or pensions.
Under the commandeering clause the federal government can't compel states (and by extension localities) to enforce federal law. The state would have to volunteer to participate.
An old friend of mine, who I never knew had any firearms philosophy, told me several years ago, (and he is 96 now) that when you begin to consider burying your firearms, is really the time to be digging them up.
In the interest of safety, if a mass confiscation is ever attempted, do the right thing. Make sure your firearm and all magazines are completely unloaded before offering it to the nice federal agent. How you choose to unload them is up to you.
Kameltoe is reminding you to buy more guns, stock up on ammo, train, buy NODS, buy armor, guard dogs, cctv cameras, etc. Thanks Brandon and Kameltoe for the reminder. I and American gun owners appreciate it!
@@aquariumdude7829 LOL. Why do you care? Not like you are gonna do anything. You will be curled up in your safe space waiting for them to haul you off. You people are harmless.
Recently had 38 firearms, ammunition, magazines, and receipts confiscated from my home. I was involved in a shootout with three robbers that was holding my 15 year old up at gun point. One of the robbers shot and killed a 16 year old in the process. I thought it was my son and I engaged in a shootout. I shot one of the robbers and damaged the getaway vehicle. After turning over the firearm used and turning myself in for questioning, officers came in with a warrant to confiscate everything out of my safes. This happened in Maryland
@@Krysco51 I’m trying. I’ve always suspected rights were a myth and it turns out my suspicions were correct. The crazy part is that I’m not charged with anything and the State Attorney said I’m a victim. The cops are the ones playing hardball. I appreciate you, though 👊🏾
Dude, my forefathers fell off a boat at Ellis Island around the turn of the 19th-20th centuries and lived in a New York tenement. Odds are, yours did too.
As a marine I took an oath to protect our constitution from both foreign and domestic terrorists ! My oath has no expectation date ! As a marine vet I still believe and will honor that oath ! YOU WANT THEM JUST TRY AND COME TAKE THEM !
I was in Law Enf for 15 years in the 90s/2000s. IF they enacted such a policy, I would've turned in my badge or made them fire me. In the 90s, I swore in front of the local judge to uphold the state and federal constitution. There is NO SUCH MECHANISM to have government agents to successfully and peacefully confiscate firearms in the U.S. (even if unconstitutional under a liberal regime).
As a law enforcement officer of 25 years and a district court prosecutor for 15 years. Rest assured I'm not incorporating full gun confiscation on my daily planner.
Over 50 years ago, I was stationed in West Germany. Four or five of us "American GIs" were sitting in a restaurant when a young girl walked over to our table. She pointed to a man sitting across the room from us and said that her grandfather wanted her to deliver a message from him. "No matter what happens, never ever give up your guns-it won't end well." (Most young Germans spoke English very well, the older generations, not so much.)
Nope, because you will be the next one they come to collect after your means of defense have been taken. They haven't forgot about you, who you voted for, what you stand for and what you believe. They are just biding their time till they are confident that enough of us have been disarmed, then it's a permanent trip to the government campgrounds for those who complied.
No worries their gun nuts . The NRA has most , if not all , politicians in their back pockets. So no one is coming for your precious gun . Settle down !
It is, and I'm tired of pretending it's not. I get what you mean, but I have it because it provides me an unfair advantage over anyone who decides to FAFO
@@aquariumdude7829 And me, in addition to the millions of others who won't comply. Keep lying to yourself. You really think your side can win this? You people couldn't even handle a 17 year old boy with an AR15.
@@ryanward8039so he is either a dem, or a fed or a troll. He made a comment to me on a different video and my reply was deleted but is comment to me was allowed to remain. Whatever his deal is he is an idiot. Yes youtube I said he is an idiot. United (We) stand.
You’d be surprised. This country has become so domesticated, the entire system would collapse in the case of revolution or civil war if it even gets that far. Yeah, there’d probably be a minority that would take action, then they would be painted as domestic terrorists by the media and everyone else would nod their head in agreement. Face it, the older generation won’t be able to put up a big fight and most of the younger ones are too scared to do anything.
I was arrested back in June for collecting petition signatures in a public park. Charges were thrown out immediately, but while I was being arrested (and having my civil rights violated by police) I asked the cops if they would go door-to-door rounding up guns. They said, yes, if they were given an order signed by a judge, they would do so. So, all you need in Washington is to find one liberal judge who wants to confiscate guns, and the cops will "just follow orders" and violate their oaths of office "to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution." Cops need better training on the Bill of Rights. And Oath Keepers needs to do more education as well.
our "forefathers" set us up: this is Section 1 of Virginia Declaration of Rights, it predates the Constitution for the United States: That all [flesh and blood] men [and women] are by nature [created by God] equally free and independent [personally sovereign], and have certain inherent [natural, God-given] rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society [legal definition of society is a collective organization of corporations; ie fictitious entities; ie the matrix], they cannot, by any compact [contract] deprive or divest their posterity [only themselves]; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety. Notice how one can be born THEN enter a state of society? the bill of rights only applies to people; men and women. the word "person" is defined as a "corporation", when you are a member of society, i.e. person, individual, us citizen, driver, etc etc etc, it is the avatar that exists in society, avatars have privileges because only real people can have natural rights. technically, we have no constitutional rights--that's why judges often get pissed off at defendants (think fictitious entities) claiming to have constitutional rights because the constitution merely AFFIRMS natural rights, whatever "constitutional" rights there are have been statutized into privileges for the avatar. Constitutional rights that people think exist don't actually exist . When a baby is born, the bankrupt US Govt creates a corporation using the baby's name in all capital letters. it then uses the corporation as collateral to get a loan from the (private front company) federal reserve represented as federal reserve notes "dollars". People are the sureties for the "US citizen" corporation. Debt is transferred to people this way, "attorn" means "transfer", police are revenue enforcers of the bankruptcy. This is the legal framework of our ensalvement since 1933. we went from the gold standard to the private faith and credit/future performance of the american people bound to a fictitious entity that is stock in a company, that's why she called Neo coppertop, our energy is being stolen. "The validity of the public debt of the United States...shall not be questioned." 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Section 4. Everything in this country has been “hypothecated” meaning everything in this country has been put up for collateral against the debt without the creditor (via the federal reserve front organization ) taking actual possession. also, cops aren't taught they are trained. when cops ask you something, ask them if they are making a request or demand. if a request, you can deny the request, if they are making a demand, there is a statute that gives the officer the authority to make such a demand. every crime is a commercial crime since it has value for the gov. court officers collude to obtain the conviction. debt is transferred. municipal bonds are issued backed by the defendant who's surety is a man or woman. future performance / slave. rights mean nothing unless you assert them. when the gov defaults then the creditors will be after the stock [corporations/persons], people will be placed in camps as sureties, it's called a hostile takeover If a cop says you're under arrest and asks you to place your hands behind your back and you do , you are consenting to the arrest. Remaining silent is to prevent disclosing incriminating evidence , rights mean nothing unless you assert them and you can unknowingly waive them through your actions including REMAINING SILENT. everything we've been taught is a lie
Try that bs in Texas or California. Both are well armed by we the people that won't let it happen. But blue states would fold. The cackling -ho can try it. And risk someone going after her.
@@shawn3693 All that you have written is pretty much exactly what a really good friend of mine has told me over the last few years. It's scary what you learn when you really dig in and do the research.
I'm retired Air Force. I live in Florida. I have a quiet circle of trusted friends. I'm an old ass man who's made my peace. Confiscation would not go well.
Guns are a lot like real estate… they cost what someone is willing to pay for them. I don’t think they can afford my 100 trillion a piece price tag for just a box of ammunition. Guns will be a bit more 😂😂😂😂😂
"Sorry. All 37 of my firearms were stolen at some point over the last 15 years. Since I knew the police weren't going to try to get them back for me, I didn't report them stolen."...or something like that.
The subject matter of this video makes me think of four quotes, by famous people in history 1) "You can have it, when you pry it from my dead cold fingers!" Charlton Heston 2) "Come and take it" King Leonidas 3) " It is better to die on your feet, then to live on your knees." General Emiliano Zapata 4)" Life is hard, life is harder if you're stupid! " John Wayne All I know , is if they decide to get stupid, I will do my best to make life hard for them. Ooop! I just remembered one more. And probably the best one. 5) " When tyranny becomes law, resistance becomes duty" Thomas Jefferson
Virginia was planning to ban/confiscate/buy back so-called "assault weapons" a few years ago. The Bill had the usual carve-out exception for LEO to keep whatever they had. This led to at least one sheriff promising to deputize every firearms owner in his county. As Deputies, their firearms would be safe.
Yup. That’s exactly it. It would cause a civil war here. Unless government wants to pay us for our guns. But I would only sell mine for x10 what I paid for them.
Think about this. The reason thugs don't go down the street entering houses at random is because they don't know who has firearms. Unregistered ownership is the key to maintaining this protection. After draconian gun laws were passed in England home invasions and residential burglaries went up dramatically. Gun owners protect non-gun owners despite themselves.
it would never happen George Washington also said, "A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.”
They will side with whomever is handing them their check. There are very few too little heroes left; the need to collect your check for food on the table outweighs the discomfort of following your alleged principles.
@@aquariumdude7829 James Baldwin once said, "The most dangerous creation of any society is the man who has nothing to lose." Someone else paraphrased it and made its meaning more clear, "The most dangerous person in the world is a good man pushed to the point having nothing to lose." The right to defend oneself is probably the most fundamental right anyone has. For a great many, that is the last straw. For them, being stripped of the right to defend oneself and one's family means the fundamental loss of all rights because they cannot be maintained. They would be _pushed_ to the point of having nothing to lose, so to speak. So, yes. There would be a reaction and it would be bloodier than the 1861-65 Civil War. It would cause a significant part of the body politic to rise up against the political class, much like the French Revolution. It might actually be so destructive that it balkanizes the US, allowing foreign powers to come in a carve us up. Do you want that to happen? I don't.
@@navret1707I can’t believe the Aussies fell for it. I’m sure they’re regretting it now especially after they were rounded up and put in Covid camps during the Coronaphobia scare.
The ATF doesn’t go into the inner city, because they know their losses would be excessive, so they are picking on the law abiding gun owners first, the guys that have the most to lose will be the first to comply.
@@joefer5360 ATF is unconstitutional TRASH. And if they did their job in the inner cities, mostly democrat ran cities, and removed guns from those who should not hold them which is your gang members, there would be alot less death in America. But they don't because it's all about taking our guns so they want that "kill count" to climb as high as possible.
@joefer5360 You ignorant little leftist.The ATFE,somehow has been granted the power of Congress.They continue to make rulings struck down thankfully by the SCOTUS.Remember how 4:43 a law is supposed to come about? I doubt you ever knew.
@@joefer5360no instead of disrespecting him try to learn to ask what someone is talking about. Act grown even on the internet. What he is saying is true. I live outside of STL the police don’t go in many parts of the inner city where gangs and real dark crime is, where heathens literally have automatic weapons and body armor. I live in a rural area now where the main issue is hard drugs like meth, and then alcohol creeping in the community lmao. But he’s right they don’t touch many parts of the inner city. I’m sure it’s def city dependent as well.
Actual confiscation, no. But what about punishing gun owners through other means? Taxes, leans on our property, lawsuits galore, etc. They'll definitely use the ATF to do an official registry. Maybe they'll make that registry public so concerned citizens can find out who their "dangerous and unhinged" gun-owning neighbors are. It would be very difficult for them to take the actual guns, but making you regret owning those guns unless you comply with the law through legal harassment and other means? That is the actual real threat.
Texas is a 2A sanctuary state. They will not cooperate with the federal government on confiscation or any other bullshit they come up with that is unconstitutional. Abbott signed all this into law back in 2021…look it up.
@@elliottbaker201 you’re seeing literal lawfare against Trump and don’t think that won’t happen to the rest of us? And what about civil suits? That’s always a prime concern in a self defense shooting. Do you really think the legal system wouldn’t be brought upon us if it’s run by anti-2A judges and lawyers?
I would never fall into violence unless one thing happens- gun confiscation. Most law enforcement will lose everything they have including their families in this case
@@McgSpook no disrespect but you are living in a pipe dream imaginary world if you believe for one second that law enforcement will not do whatever they are told to do by their boss and agency the give allegiance to. Every single thing they are told to do they have. These pri*cks helped enforce Covid mandates which in January of 2021 were all determined to be unlawful by the Supreme Court which I'm on record trying to teach various departments that they are breaking the law enforcing state and federal mandates, the ignored my attorney and I continue to go on force the illegal mandates and then the Supreme Court rule. They went right back in each one of those police stations gave them a lot of hell and threaten some lawsuit, which I am still thinking about bringing some forward. Every state which has no open carry or concealed carry laws and purchase today but wait 30 days to take possession of your firearm is violating the declaration of independence and constitution and these cops will thrown any person violating those illegal laws in jail in a blink of an eye and everyone knows it. Ammunition law restrictive purchases, silencer laws, felons never being able to own a firearm again, cops enforce these and the would be ignoring these if the were not turncoats. The federal law enforcement are freedom haters and 100% will fall in line when directed to do so and there are no good ones otherwise there would have been a coup against the fbi, DOJ and all intel agencies 25 years ago
@@tgs9740 i guess so in some cases. most, at least in the places ive lived, are gun owners and 2a fans. I'm sure that changes from place to place. If that ever happens i guess we will see who is who pretty fast.
The supporters of gun confiscation seem to think they can use UN troops to handle the dirty work. It would go very badly as other scenarios would undoubtedly be introduced to add confusion. They, the disarmers, would eventually lose and the cost in lives would be horrendous.
Yeah- "mandatory buyback" would specifically be confiscation, just with some pretense of compensation attached (as an aside, several aussie friends tell me 'nobody' turned in their guns -no doubt that only goes as far as their acquaintances and maybe some of those people's acquaintances, plus some rumors; but from the few numbers I've seen as well, it looks like maybe 15-20% of just the guns the government already knew were out there got collected, and that sounds like they just declared a victory and left it at that.)
@@lieninger Pretty much. Though Australians were never as well armed as Americans, they still have enough guns privately circulating that their government worries about it.
they won't do it that way. They'll shut off the power/water and starve you out. They'll use their illegal immigrant army to enforce their illegal mandates.
Wrong, massively wrong. It's the polar opposite, by a wide margin of 15%+ most are "on the fence" also beyond that margin, stonch anti gun people are the minority, period.
Confiscation would look exactly like Massachusetts, April 15, 1775. The first time the American people took up arms against an oppressive and tyrannical government. We all know how that worked out.
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.6 (1/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m05kZ2GDKXg/mqdefault.jpg)
Confiscation would look like a BLOODBATH. WE WILL NOT GIVE UP OUR ARMS.
Lol.
Ya right dude.🙄 most people will comply the moment police come to the door demanding them. Most people aren’t ready to die fighting for it and that’s the last issue. The first issue is gun owners unwillingness to protest and call their representatives before saying some edgy shit online
@@user-jd8zl4gv8o- you fail to realize that those of that have called- see those Elected are unwilling to do their Job, So they must be removed- by any means necessary......
damn... you took the phrase I was going to use !!
it absolutely would become just that, which may be part of the plan, remember KUMala did actually mention a depopulation agenda.
one or two may happen, but then the 'knock on the door' goes real bad for any cop... local, state, or fed........... I am sure that would absolute start to happen within days of 1st attempt of confiscation
If you cannot see the irony of having a gun ban enforced by men with guns, then you fail to understand why the second amendment was written in the first place.
@allengose5438 no there's absolutely nothing ironic at all, it's as straightforward as you can get
@@allengose5438 Federalist 46 is the best argument for 2A.
@@StirlingQShagnasty "The Founding Fathers didn't carry their muskets to the market!" Actually yes, yes they did. They were always strapped. Everyone back then was.
@@bwofficial1776 No argument from me. I live in a constitutional carry state.
@@bwofficial1776 Not only that, but it was common for it to be REQUIRED to take your musket to church with you.
I'm a police officer and I took an oath to uphold and defend the constitution, not politicians. I will NOT assist the federal government, or ANY government agency, including the agency I work for, with violating the constitutional rights of US citizens. When I took the oath, I took it seriously. I haven't violated it at any point throughout my entire 30 year career and I will NOT violate it now, for anyone...period!
Thank you, sir, my respects!
Shut up.
But how many will ?
This administration has turned our military WOKE.
I’m a 29 year police officer and I also took and oath. I’m not violating no one’s constitutional rights. Politicians can kick rocks.
@equine2020 To be honest, I don't have the answer for you. I can only be responsible for myself, which includes coaching younger officers of the oath they took as well. Wouldn't be the first time I've called out younger officers if I saw one of them getting out of line or disrespecting a citizen unnecessarily. I take the approach of mentoring them, hoping that when I retire, they'll remember the "lessons" I taught them. Sure, meet aggression with aggression, but don't be the one that escalated it. Deescalation works most (but not all) of the time.
I try to set the example, but my lessons only apply to the officers I've worked with or continue to work with. I work for a large agency, and still see officers in my department who I've never met before in 30 years. So needless to say, I've never met 99.999% of the people who were police officers all across the US during my 30 years. So I have no influence on them at all. I can only try to influence those I work with by setting an example of what enforcing the law within the boundaries of the constitution looks like.
Canada here: Americans...........NEVER give up your Right to bear arms.
Don't worry , we aren't a bunch of pussies.
Bear 🐻 arms? 😂
@@steveadams5190how would you say it
@@doughodges3495bare
And American here: Canadian friend, best of luck, and you’re always welcome down here in Texas (it may be a tad hot for your liking 😅)
An oldtimer told me as a kid. "If they come for your guns, give'm the bullets first." I think he was a WW 1 vet.
The real price is extremely high 🩸and has been paid for
again and again
I dont know if this is a quote from someone or not but I always heard "you cant have my gun but you can have all the lead you want"
@@wchv94str9Sounds like the Alamo.
Proper etiquette is to empty the guns before handing them to anyone...
"You Want To Turn Your Gun in", Or No?
“If tyranny knocks, I’m going to let freedom ring.”
💯
Amen brother
Amen! Shall not be infringed...
When Tierney knocks Let Freedom Ring I like that one this comment deserves an award❤
This should be on a t-shirt
Confiscation would look like a full-out Civil War in this country.
Fk it... let's get er done. It's time this country remembers WTF it's here for. IT'S TIME we MAKE THIS FKN GOVERNMENT REMEMBER WHO THEY'RE HERE FOR.Theyre doing nothing but pushing US TOWARDS SUBJUGATION AN SERVITUDE. That's ALL THEY WANT, ONCE deregulation was SIGNED when PEOPLE WERE BREACHING THE GAP OF WEALTH the ROTHCHILDS and OTHER ORIGINAL FAMILIES changed the path of HUMAN FREEDOM.
Coming soon.
Not necessarily! I think the big point is, that they can't really do it! Like I said in my post is that the danger is people who think they can! For most of us, we could simply ignore Joe's executive orders! Conceivably, the pistol brace rule could have prosecuted people who bought factory braced pistols or maybe people who posted pictures online! The Yankee Marshal put it best, nothing will happen if you just keep it to yourself!
Not a chance. They’ll bend over and take it like they normally do to all infringements by the tyrannical government lol. All lip
@@garywillis9528Lol they will try to do it. They are dumb enough and gun control always concludes at the same end.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”.
And yet they say flag burning is freedom of speech!
Confiscation would be the beginning and end of this country .
💯
I think it would be more likely the end of the administration in power
@@raygongaware8647 Only if you Give Up.
@@raygongaware8647 Nah just those trying to enforce it.
The beginning of the end has already begun but it’ll surely go downhill from there.
The British tried that back on April 19, 1775. It didn’t go as planned.
Lexington
UK stands for "Under Knutts"
Hello government, my name is Pete, and this is my son Repete. FAFO a55hats.
🇺🇲
@@davidcbrainard no matter how well Democrats plan, people are not as predictable as democrat leaders think. Numerous wars throughout history were planned as quick victories but turned into much more.
Tyrants don’t fear a thug with a Glock.
Tyrants DO FEAR a Patriot with a rifle!
Plan accordingly.
Already on it my fellow brother God please turn this a way in our favor🙏 and let the evil perish! And sent to the pit retired generals are talking word is spreading fast prepare!!
Oh, but they do fear a hoodlum with a Glock. That's why the ATF knocks on doors in nice neighborhoods, not the ghetto.
Glocks with switches ARs Uzis AKs Mac10s Auto 9s
@@Tatteredghost96and you've got a total of zero of those bud.
@@NobodyAwsum And you have one rifle and the SWAT team has Bearcats, Level 4 Plate carriers, and mini drones. BUD.
I am an American citizen who pays taxes and I REFUSE to let ANYONE take my constitutional rights away from me
Income taxes are based on self assessment and VOLUNTARY compliance. Page 1, IRS manual. Kinda sorta like the Military, you WILL volunteer!
@@rayhorn7035The IRS has been pretty clear on that. "Voluntary" just means that you have control over how and what you declare on your tax form. But you're still obligated to pay.
They phrase it that way because they know only have enough agents to enforce on a fraction of the submissions.
As a retired police officer I can tell you from a logistics standpoint there is no way to collect 330 million firearms. There are roughly 780,000 police officers in the US and 1.3 million military members. Even if 10% of the population said no and fought back against the government, it would last 1 day if they went door to door. When I worked LAPD in the 90’s one patrol division was lucky that they took 100-150 guns off the street a month. Do the math it’s impossible and it will never happen. People will fight back against it with deadly force. Count on it!
Good comment !
Think lots of agents and cops would retire..
I honestly don't think the police or military would do that ( I hope they wouldn't). I fantasize we'd see military and police standing with the citizens. One can dream.
I knew a lot of cops when I lived in LA in the 90s. Before the 92 riots, and the North Hollywood event. Every cop I knew was an awesome role-model, and just plane cool
@mattcroddy4691 well I think your right.. they fight for our freedoms so I'm with you on that thought
Forced gun confiscation would look extremely fucking bloody, especially here in the rural south.
I could see southerners grouping up and fighting under their own flags. The rest of the country i dont think would. Too much division over here in the west coast. Guess that just means more gotta go!
Amen... hopefully the sheriff's would stand their ground
@@commiehunter733 I know for a fact our Sheriff would. He would likely deputize us all also. Most Local PD would probably follow. The real fight would come against Feds and democrat loyalist local cops.
@Jason-mh1pl f$%%& yourself..moved to Canada..slime
@@Jason-mh1pl The west has the most Conservative gun loving people, Wyoming is the Most Red State
I don't take the word Civil War lightly, but I honestly think that gun confiscation is one of the very few (if not the ONLY) event that would lead to Civil War.
Apparently you've forgotten about the 30 million illegals they've let in our country? Pretty sure that's going to lead to something people aren't going to like. Oh wait, already has. Like free everything for the fucks that shouldn't even be here
Wait until 1/6/25...when they refuse to certify Trump
Riots in inner cities would cause truckers to not deliver goods into that city, foraging would occur in sounding areas which would lead to fathers protecting their own families
There's something 5-6 million regular duty and reserve military personnel in the country. Maybe 2-3 million armed law enforcement.And they're going to disarm 275 million gun owners ? It won't be pretty if they try.
its definitely a contender for the the catalyst of it.
By God I will NOT give up my arms!!!!!🇺🇸
As an American it is my duty to protect myself and my fellow Americans from threats both foreign and domestic
I swore an oath to do that very thing..
I have taken that very oath and I stand by it !
Remember, in America, there are people against the constitution .
I did not take an oath to anyone, but i do have a personal oath to the men and women who came before me and made this country. And I have a duty to make sure their sacrifice was not in vain. And keep America, America!!
🥲
A wise old sage once said: "If it's time to hide your guns, it's time to use them".
"From a historical study of weapons and political dynamics, Carroll Quigley concludes that the characteristics of weapons are the main predictor of democracy. Democracy tends to emerge only when the best weapons available are easy for individuals to buy and use. This explains why democracy occurs so rarely in human history."
Carroll Quigley was Clinton's favorite professor in college.
Stealing this old sages wisdom. To share, of course.
@sdrc92126
Ironic, considering Clinton was no friend of the Second Amendment.
BINGO.
Because, judging from past occurrences, if you say "I lost them in a boating accident!', they'll just shoot you on the spot ANYWAY. Hell, they'll probably shoot you on the spot even AFTER you hand them over, or maybe when you go to get them, so... POINT BEING.
@@sdrc92126 if what you mean by democracy is "will of the people" then I hate to break it to you but we don't have a democracy (or even a representative republic, if one wants to quibble over definitions).
“What would confiscation look like?” 1776, but much bloodier.
Much, much bloodier, we have repeating firearms today.
It would probably result in the loss of 20% or more of the population. Only a small percentage of the population produces food and most of the population can't get along without electricity.
@@GH-tp6vu agreed. It would be the worst thing that ever happened to our country. If it survived, future generations would hate us for destroying our dominance and squandering our resources.
@@brianhusted3909 I think 20% is a very conservative minimum number. I’d be willing to bet that around one third of our population would be decimated. It would be more devastating than both world wars combined.
All I can say is that I’m not going to supply body bags for all of them !
I guarantee you that the vast majority of police officers would say, “Oh hell no! Are you crazy?” after being told to go door to door and confiscate firearms from citizens. They value their lives more than their paychecks or pensions.
I argue that they would follow their orders
Under the commandeering clause the federal government can't compel states (and by extension localities) to enforce federal law. The state would have to volunteer to participate.
@@CaseyBerard-qv6bithey would resign as they probably value living!
When the government tells you that you don't need a gun, you most definitely need a gun.
It's difficult to have a buyback when nobody's selling.
MANDATORY means they will take them by force !
That, and they never owned them in the first place; how do they propose to "buy back" that which they did not sell?
@@donaldmiller2654We will just make it mandatory that we won’t sell them by force
You didn’t sell it to me in the first place, you can’t buy it back.
It's also against federal law to sell firearms to someone with a criminal record, so that leaves the government out.
The golden rule when it comes to tyrants: tyrants NEVER play fairly
Neither do the oppressed......
Or have fair elections
Trumpstock ban?
@@mitchelltriplett7974 -huh?
@@commonsenseisntcommon1776 Trump unconstitutionally banned bumpstocks and weaponized the ATF to declare everything a machine gun.
An old friend of mine, who I never knew had any firearms philosophy, told me several years ago, (and he is 96 now) that when you begin to consider burying your firearms, is really the time to be digging them up.
When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.
I will be in the 'outlaw' column.
💯
Mine are not for taking
I guess I'm going to be considered an outlaw cause they not getting mine😂
Same here
Well all be outlaws my brother
In the interest of safety, if a mass confiscation is ever attempted, do the right thing. Make sure your firearm and all magazines are completely unloaded before offering it to the nice federal agent.
How you choose to unload them is up to you.
FUCK YEAH!!!
My sentiments exactly!
Took me a second on this one, but I got it. 😂😅😂
Yes!
The agent won’t be looking so nice
Americans KEEP YOUR FIREARMS 😮
yes we will........................................................................
" If you like your guns , you can keep your guns ..." FBO FJB FKH & FMSM
except for felons
selective infringement
hypocrites
@@marccampbellsr1085You deserve a medal. 🏅💀
19th century American Indians
To 21 century Americans
Never Surrender your Firearms
Kameltoe is reminding you to buy more guns, stock up on ammo, train, buy NODS, buy armor, guard dogs, cctv cameras, etc. Thanks Brandon and Kameltoe for the reminder. I and American gun owners appreciate it!
Yep. Gun "control" is not and has never even been about guns. Its about CONTROL.
🐫😂
Don't forget about Tampon tim
Hilarious, Cameltoe.....
I love it. 😁
Justin Trudeau is a weirdo & no man sits like that. 😳
Confiscation would look like a big year for the mortuary
Oh, bull! Nobody will do a damn thing besides post phony macho comments on the internet! 😂
What the Dems buy stock in mortuary services.
@@aquariumdude7829 wanna bet your mentality is part of the problem people are getting real tired of this shit vets are too
@@aquariumdude7829 their is ground chatter amongst generals letting vets know its getting real close to that time!
@@aquariumdude7829 LOL. Why do you care? Not like you are gonna do anything. You will be curled up in your safe space waiting for them to haul you off. You people are harmless.
R.T.C. Registration, Taxation, Confiscation. Historically followed by: S.I.E. Subjection, Incarceration, Extermination.
Recently had 38 firearms, ammunition, magazines, and receipts confiscated from my home. I was involved in a shootout with three robbers that was holding my 15 year old up at gun point. One of the robbers shot and killed a 16 year old in the process. I thought it was my son and I engaged in a shootout. I shot one of the robbers and damaged the getaway vehicle. After turning over the firearm used and turning myself in for questioning, officers came in with a warrant to confiscate everything out of my safes. This happened in Maryland
Keep on them, get your shit back. Don’t let them keep it.
@@Krysco51 I’m trying. I’ve always suspected rights were a myth and it turns out my suspicions were correct. The crazy part is that I’m not charged with anything and the State Attorney said I’m a victim. The cops are the ones playing hardball. I appreciate you, though 👊🏾
Maryland that figures
@@southeast78Share your story please. Social media is very powerful!
Our forefathers were smart and saw this coming. That’s why the constitution qualifies enemies both foreign and domestic.
ALL Democrats, moderates, and independents are the domestic enemy.
Amen
Dude, my forefathers fell off a boat at Ellis Island around the turn of the 19th-20th centuries and lived in a New York tenement. Odds are, yours did too.
@@aquariumdude7829by "our fore fathers" we mean the country's founding fathers. You know what is meant.
@@aquariumdude7829 Consider how you view basic American values and liberties, we should have sent your forefathers back.
If someone wants to disarm you for no reason have no doubt that person is your enemy.
As a marine I took an oath to protect our constitution from both foreign and domestic terrorists ! My oath has no expectation date ! As a marine vet I still believe and will honor that oath ! YOU WANT THEM JUST TRY AND COME TAKE THEM !
Guess Walz forgot his oath
I hear ya brother, AF vet here.
@@peterburi2727 we'll just have to band together in order to fulfill our oaths.
Sempi Fi.
We will stand shoulder to shoulder by brother!
I was in Law Enf for 15 years in the 90s/2000s. IF they enacted such a policy, I would've turned in my badge or made them fire me. In the 90s, I swore in front of the local judge to uphold the state and federal constitution. There is NO SUCH MECHANISM to have government agents to successfully and peacefully confiscate firearms in the U.S. (even if unconstitutional under a liberal regime).
As a law enforcement officer of 25 years and a district court prosecutor for 15 years. Rest assured I'm not incorporating full gun confiscation on my daily planner.
God bless you!
Please , talk to all your co-workers
Another Good Lawman..............Thank you Sir!
That's good, but I'd feel even better if you'd phrased that "any gun confiscation whatsoever, unless possession by a convicted felon is the issue".
@@Osage1956 Agreed, no Felon in possession or any convicted wife beater.
Over 50 years ago, I was stationed in West Germany. Four or five of us "American GIs" were sitting in a restaurant when a young girl walked over to our table. She pointed to a man sitting across the room from us and said that her grandfather wanted her to deliver a message from him. "No matter what happens, never ever give up your guns-it won't end well." (Most young Germans spoke English very well, the older generations, not so much.)
Real.
Expect Resistance ☠️
It didn't work for the native Americans
You can't comply your way out of tyranny.
Nope, because you will be the next one they come to collect after your means of defense have been taken. They haven't forgot about you, who you voted for, what you stand for and what you believe. They are just biding their time till they are confident that enough of us have been disarmed, then it's a permanent trip to the government campgrounds for those who complied.
Or vote your way out of Tyranny
All this has to happen in our country is for them to declare you a domestic terrorist. Then they can just seizure guns and even throw you in prison.
A politician who fears an armed citizenry is a politician who need be feared.
Exactly right. Their motives are not good.
No worries their gun nuts . The NRA has most , if not all , politicians in their back pockets.
So no one is coming for your precious gun . Settle down !
I don’t understand how the government can “buy back” what the government didn’t sell to me in the first place.
They’re “buying” these guns with the taxes they already stole from us.
Understanding that an AR-15 is NOT an assault weapon.
Right but it's a semi good enough we'll leave it at that.
nighttrain at least we're not bound to using a musket like BACK in the day😂
Politicians do not care.
The phrase is an oxymoron. All weapons are designed for assault.
It is, and I'm tired of pretending it's not. I get what you mean, but I have it because it provides me an unfair advantage over anyone who decides to FAFO
Taking the guns would make most American Outlaws! No one's going to give up their guns.
This country is unique in that we take the phrase, “FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS” very seriously. Come try it, US gov, I value my liberty over my life.
Who is "we?" You mean "you!" Nobody elected you! 😂
@@aquariumdude7829 And me, in addition to the millions of others who won't comply. Keep lying to yourself. You really think your side can win this? You people couldn't even handle a 17 year old boy with an AR15.
@@ryanward8039so he is either a dem, or a fed or a troll. He made a comment to me on a different video and my reply was deleted but is comment to me was allowed to remain. Whatever his deal is he is an idiot. Yes youtube I said he is an idiot. United (We) stand.
@@aquariumdude7829that goes for me too. Come and take em’ !
@@aquariumdude7829I elected myself, commie
She has another thing coming if she thinks true Americans will comply with this
It will be WW3, but on our own soil.
Hearing damage yeah
True Americans wore masks and got the Vax. If we cant resist then we won't resist ever.
You’d be surprised. This country has become so domesticated, the entire system would collapse in the case of revolution or civil war if it even gets that far. Yeah, there’d probably be a minority that would take action, then they would be painted as domestic terrorists by the media and everyone else would nod their head in agreement. Face it, the older generation won’t be able to put up a big fight and most of the younger ones are too scared to do anything.
An attempt at confiscation would be met with force.
Lol. Trudeau Estimate vs Intelligent Estimate. You nailed it!
I was arrested back in June for collecting petition signatures in a public park. Charges were thrown out immediately, but while I was being arrested (and having my civil rights violated by police) I asked the cops if they would go door-to-door rounding up guns. They said, yes, if they were given an order signed by a judge, they would do so. So, all you need in Washington is to find one liberal judge who wants to confiscate guns, and the cops will "just follow orders" and violate their oaths of office "to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution." Cops need better training on the Bill of Rights. And Oath Keepers needs to do more education as well.
our "forefathers" set us up: this is Section 1 of Virginia Declaration of Rights, it predates the Constitution for the United States:
That all [flesh and blood] men [and women] are by nature [created by God] equally free and independent [personally sovereign], and have certain inherent [natural, God-given] rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society [legal definition of society is a collective organization of corporations; ie fictitious entities; ie the matrix], they cannot, by any compact [contract] deprive or divest their posterity [only themselves]; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.
Notice how one can be born THEN enter a state of society? the bill of rights only applies to people; men and women. the word "person" is defined as a "corporation", when you are a member of society, i.e. person, individual, us citizen, driver, etc etc etc, it is the avatar that exists in society, avatars have privileges because only real people can have natural rights. technically, we have no constitutional rights--that's why judges often get pissed off at defendants (think fictitious entities) claiming to have constitutional rights because the constitution merely AFFIRMS natural rights, whatever "constitutional" rights there are have been statutized into privileges for the avatar. Constitutional rights that people think exist don't actually exist .
When a baby is born, the bankrupt US Govt creates a corporation using the baby's name in all capital letters. it then uses the corporation as collateral to get a loan from the (private front company) federal reserve represented as federal reserve notes "dollars". People are the sureties for the "US citizen" corporation. Debt is transferred to people this way, "attorn" means "transfer", police are revenue enforcers of the bankruptcy. This is the legal framework of our ensalvement since 1933. we went from the gold standard to the private faith and credit/future performance of the american people bound to a fictitious entity that is stock in a company, that's why she called Neo coppertop, our energy is being stolen.
"The validity of the public debt of the United States...shall not be questioned."
14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Section 4. Everything in this country has been “hypothecated” meaning everything in this country has been put up for collateral against the debt without the creditor (via the federal reserve front organization ) taking actual possession.
also, cops aren't taught they are trained. when cops ask you something, ask them if they are making a request or demand. if a request, you can deny the request, if they are making a demand, there is a statute that gives the officer the authority to make such a demand. every crime is a commercial crime since it has value for the gov. court officers collude to obtain the conviction. debt is transferred. municipal bonds are issued backed by the defendant who's surety is a man or woman. future performance / slave. rights mean nothing unless you assert them.
when the gov defaults then the creditors will be after the stock [corporations/persons], people will be placed in camps as sureties, it's called a hostile takeover
If a cop says you're under arrest and asks you to place your hands behind your back and you do , you are consenting to the arrest. Remaining silent is to prevent disclosing incriminating evidence , rights mean nothing unless you assert them and you can unknowingly waive them through your actions including REMAINING SILENT.
everything we've been taught is a lie
Try that bs in Texas or California. Both are well armed by we the people that won't let it happen. But blue states would fold. The cackling -ho can try it. And risk someone going after her.
@@shawn3693 All that you have written is pretty much exactly what a really good friend of mine has told me over the last few years. It's scary what you learn when you really dig in and do the research.
that's the same mentality that's currently in the US military. They will be "just following orders"
Not around here. Officers still have common sense!
It would make the Civil War look like a cookout at grandma's house.
People Forget that in a civil war the are no Rules of Engagement
I'm retired Air Force.
I live in Florida.
I have a quiet circle of trusted friends.
I'm an old ass man who's made my peace.
Confiscation would not go well.
If we lean on each other we won't fall in the mud !
Your neighbor here in fla. And I approve this message.
Real talk
Perfect description of me.
Army here, and from Florida (Native Born Floridian, and reside in Central FL) and fully agree with you.
One of the big perks of having an insane amount of guns in the US is how impossible confiscation becomes
Simple answer? No. The government simply doesn’t have the logistics to even scratch the surface.
You underestimate the Evil behind the Liberals which are striving to destroy American and subjugate her citizens.
True and if they confiscated a few thousand guns.Think of the Black market it would create.
How can a government "buy back" a firearm that they never sold you in the first place?
And they use the money they first stole from you through taxes.
@@sidengland6302I don't think they could afford my guns they would be to hi priced.
Great logic
@@phillipodell3834 it wont be u that sets the price, the pay some lowish flat fee
Guns are a lot like real estate… they cost what someone is willing to pay for them. I don’t think they can afford my 100 trillion a piece price tag for just a box of ammunition. Guns will be a bit more 😂😂😂😂😂
"Sorry. All 37 of my firearms were stolen at some point over the last 15 years. Since I knew the police weren't going to try to get them back for me, I didn't report them stolen."...or something like that.
Love it 🇺🇸
@@heartsoulstrengthtraining i genuinely know someone who had their guns stolen and the police did not find them unfortunately this seems to be true
You just said how many firearms you have. All you commentary folks stick your foot on your mouths alot 😅
@@Nperez1986….how many did I say are registered?
Lost all mine in a fishing accident
The subject matter of this video makes me think of four quotes, by famous people in history
1) "You can have it, when you pry it from my dead cold fingers!" Charlton Heston
2) "Come and take it" King Leonidas
3) " It is better to die on your feet, then to live on your knees." General Emiliano Zapata
4)" Life is hard, life is harder if you're stupid! " John Wayne
All I know , is if they decide to get stupid, I will do my best to make life hard for them. Ooop! I just remembered one more. And probably the best one.
5) " When tyranny becomes law, resistance becomes duty"
Thomas Jefferson
Don't care. I will not comply.
Me neither man. Fuck 'em
The first rule if you don't plan to comply, is not to advertise the fact.
@@TheRealCheckmatefalse bravado, this dude better start caring.
Why would you allow it to get to this point
@redlicoricerifleexpert7you dont know how He thinks .shut up.489
My local sheriff has already stated that the government can kick rocks if they try to take away the 2a
same in my state
Virginia was planning to ban/confiscate/buy back so-called "assault weapons" a few years ago. The Bill had the usual carve-out exception for LEO to keep whatever they had. This led to at least one sheriff promising to deputize every firearms owner in his county. As Deputies, their firearms would be safe.
@@ralphm6901
BASED MOVED
WHAT AN AMERICAN
Based 🔥
It would turn millions of people INTO a criminal for owning their property. Once that happens, they have nothing to lose
Yup. That’s exactly it. It would cause a civil war here. Unless government wants to pay us for our guns. But I would only sell mine for x10 what I paid for them.
Wrong answer! Don't give them up period!
That’s right👍🏻
Think about this. The reason thugs don't go down the street entering houses at random is because they don't know who has firearms. Unregistered ownership is the key to maintaining this protection. After draconian gun laws were passed in England home invasions and residential burglaries went up dramatically. Gun owners protect non-gun owners despite themselves.
I don’t care if George Washington himself came back from the dead and said “it’s ok hand them in”, I still won’t do it.
it would never happen George Washington also said, "A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.”
If General Washington came back today he would already be organizing another army.
George Washington would pick up his gun and fight if they tried to take his guns.
Amen to that.
😂😂😂 amen
A lot of police will need to decide which side of their oath they're on and make peace with it. 🤷
Nah, i think the people would decide for them.
They will side with whomever is handing them their check. There are very few too little heroes left; the need to collect your check for food on the table outweighs the discomfort of following your alleged principles.
Military too
@@phrozen4lifethe other side might not sign checks but donate metal instead
@@phrozen4life What goods a check when everyone is dead?
It would be VERY bad for those that would attempt to confiscate. I say that as a vet.
Oh, bull.
@@aquariumdude7829troll
@@aquariumdude7829 Are you naturally this much of a coward? Or do you have to try at it lol
@@aquariumdude7829you are more then welcome to try to take them comrade.
@@aquariumdude7829 I'm your huckleberry.
Big talk, Justin. No one even owns an AR. Not even the Eskimos.
Japanese Admiral Yamamoto
“ There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.”
there would be barrels pointing out of every window and over every fence
He never said that. It's a myth.
modern day Japan: “THAT KITCHEN/GARDEN APPLIANCE IS A WEAPON OF WAR!!! TAKE HIM TO JAIL!!!”
@@aquariumdude7829 it may be a myth that he said it but it doesn’t make it any less true. We have more guns than people in this country.
@@stevesherlock5334 Not that they have done us much good lately. They sure didn't stop the covid flim-flam from being imposed upon us.
You know the old saying that "a man with nothing to lose is a dangerous man" would apply if this were to happen!
Once he cannot afford the clothes on his back he’ll become savage. Or do drugs.
I wish the phrase "Buy Back" would quit being used ... An entity can not buy back something it never owned or sold.
And they dont even offer the value…they give out $50 gift cards for some twinkies
Never register anything
@@davefletch3063 I went to a buy back to sell my guns. The buyer (the government) failed the background check.
We agree.
It's just a 'nicey nice'term, like calling illegal aliens 'undocumented ' , bank robbery ' non-depositor withdrawal', and rape 'semi-consentual sex!
The criminals don't care about the laws ?????
I would rather vacation in France during the French Revolution than witness the reaction to a mass firearm confiscation.
There won't be any "reaction." 😂
@@aquariumdude7829 James Baldwin once said, "The most dangerous creation of any society is the man who has nothing to lose." Someone else paraphrased it and made its meaning more clear, "The most dangerous person in the world is a good man pushed to the point having nothing to lose."
The right to defend oneself is probably the most fundamental right anyone has. For a great many, that is the last straw. For them, being stripped of the right to defend oneself and one's family means the fundamental loss of all rights because they cannot be maintained. They would be _pushed_ to the point of having nothing to lose, so to speak. So, yes. There would be a reaction and it would be bloodier than the 1861-65 Civil War. It would cause a significant part of the body politic to rise up against the political class, much like the French Revolution. It might actually be so destructive that it balkanizes the US, allowing foreign powers to come in a carve us up.
Do you want that to happen?
I don't.
F*** that garden tool.
@@aquariumdude7829 Oh it's this guy again. Just ignore him folks. He's a paid liberal troll.
@@aquariumdude7829ur slow
That famous quote from Mao actually reinforces our attitudes: No guns = no political power.
And make sure to read the full quote, not just the bit that everyone thinks of.
@@FlyingYellowPony I read his whole book.
The phrase, “F’ around and find out.” comes to mind
FUCK?
Don't be Skeeeeeeerd.
It would be a bloody mess for anyone who tried it.
You forgot to mention Venezuela and Ecuador, they outlawed all guns so they could not have opposition.
And Australia.
@@navret1707I can’t believe the Aussies fell for it. I’m sure they’re regretting it now especially after they were rounded up and put in Covid camps during the Coronaphobia scare.
The Cubans as well.
@@navret1707 where's that in writing? p-ls look it up, it doesn't appear to be across the board banned.
You can't "buy back" what you never owned and sold in the first place.
It's fucking theft is what it is
Ask the British how that worked out
You can't buy back what you never owned any more than you can come back from where you haven't been!
Hundreds of billions of dollars💸 to"buy back"everyone's guns? No problem! The"federal reserve"can just print the"money"!!
The gov't doesn't pass a background check
And, they're 'buying' them back with your tax dollars. You are paying them to take your guns for you.
I fear the loss of our rights through "death by 1000 cuts" more than through something like an outright confiscation.
Spot on! We are there.....NOW!!!
Exactly
It’s already happened. The old republic is already mortally injured, it just dunna know it yet.
Ghosts sound like a great idea to combat this tyranny from a woman running for office
Confiscation would look like civil war overnight.
We are yearning to be free
I was told as a boy if you keep poking at a bee's nest someone's going to get stung retired US ARMY VET!
@brian Caldwell
That’s exactly what the Democrats are doing to the American people and have for the last 4 years.
“No one’s coming for your guns.” -Every democrat voter ever asked about gun control
Trump once said, "We could just take away the guns, let the courts deal with it."
Yeah, they lie.
@@davidbeppler3032 He was talking about taking guns away from dangerous individuals. Like you.
Yep, right before they came for the guns.
They were probably thinking of water guns😅
Worst mistake they could ever make, they ain't getting my guns!
The ATF doesn’t go into the inner city, because they know their losses would be excessive, so they are picking on the law abiding gun owners first, the guys that have the most to lose will be the first to comply.
@@joefer5360 ATF is unconstitutional TRASH. And if they did their job in the inner cities, mostly democrat ran cities, and removed guns from those who should not hold them which is your gang members, there would be alot less death in America. But they don't because it's all about taking our guns so they want that "kill count" to climb as high as possible.
They come to my neck of the woods! They better come deep! Real deep! We practice daily! ATF, US Marshall's or military. We give two f#cks!
@joefer5360 You ignorant little leftist.The ATFE,somehow has been granted the power of Congress.They continue to make rulings struck down thankfully by the SCOTUS.Remember how 4:43 a law is supposed to come about? I doubt you ever knew.
@@joefer5360no instead of disrespecting him try to learn to ask what someone is talking about. Act grown even on the internet. What he is saying is true. I live outside of STL the police don’t go in many parts of the inner city where gangs and real dark crime is, where heathens literally have automatic weapons and body armor. I live in a rural area now where the main issue is hard drugs like meth, and then alcohol creeping in the community lmao. But he’s right they don’t touch many parts of the inner city. I’m sure it’s def city dependent as well.
"Inner city" means neighborhood built by our grandparents for their children that was taken over by enemies
This would be the biggest FAFO of all time.
HELL YEAH!!!!
Admiral Yamamoto was onto something when he said:
"there will be a rifle behind every blade of grass"...
This is the way
@@garypascucci5797He never actually said that. It's a myth.
@@aquariumdude7829 It's the point that matters. Were you a hall monitor in high school?
Shall not infringe.
Imagine what that looks like. 🇺🇸
It would look like war in our streets.
Actual confiscation, no. But what about punishing gun owners through other means? Taxes, leans on our property, lawsuits galore, etc. They'll definitely use the ATF to do an official registry. Maybe they'll make that registry public so concerned citizens can find out who their "dangerous and unhinged" gun-owning neighbors are. It would be very difficult for them to take the actual guns, but making you regret owning those guns unless you comply with the law through legal harassment and other means? That is the actual real threat.
Texas is a 2A sanctuary state. They will not cooperate with the federal government on confiscation or any other bullshit they come up with that is unconstitutional. Abbott signed all this into law back in 2021…look it up.
Lawsuits... Lol
@@elliottbaker201 you’re seeing literal lawfare against Trump and don’t think that won’t happen to the rest of us? And what about civil suits? That’s always a prime concern in a self defense shooting. Do you really think the legal system wouldn’t be brought upon us if it’s run by anti-2A judges and lawyers?
Cmeltoe Harris let it slip about already having registry
You must think we are pussys or something sir or ma’am.
I would never fall into violence unless one thing happens- gun confiscation. Most law enforcement will lose everything they have including their families in this case
That will be so cathartic
honestly, i doubt most law enforcement would assist. definitely not the local variety.
@@McgSpook no disrespect but you are living in a pipe dream imaginary world if you believe for one second that law enforcement will not do whatever they are told to do by their boss and agency the give allegiance to. Every single thing they are told to do they have. These pri*cks helped enforce Covid mandates which in January of 2021 were all determined to be unlawful by the Supreme Court which I'm on record trying to teach various departments that they are breaking the law enforcing state and federal mandates, the ignored my attorney and I continue to go on force the illegal mandates and then the Supreme Court rule. They went right back in each one of those police stations gave them a lot of hell and threaten some lawsuit, which I am still thinking about bringing some forward. Every state which has no open carry or concealed carry laws and purchase today but wait 30 days to take possession of your firearm is violating the declaration of independence and constitution and these cops will thrown any person violating those illegal laws in jail in a blink of an eye and everyone knows it. Ammunition law restrictive purchases, silencer laws, felons never being able to own a firearm again, cops enforce these and the would be ignoring these if the were not turncoats. The federal law enforcement are freedom haters and 100% will fall in line when directed to do so and there are no good ones otherwise there would have been a coup against the fbi, DOJ and all intel agencies 25 years ago
Yeah because we know where they live. @@McgSpook
@@tgs9740 i guess so in some cases. most, at least in the places ive lived, are gun owners and 2a fans. I'm sure that changes from place to place. If that ever happens i guess we will see who is who pretty fast.
Exercise your 2A rights 🇺🇸
The supporters of gun confiscation seem to think they can use UN troops to handle the dirty work. It would go very badly as other scenarios would undoubtedly be introduced to add confusion. They, the disarmers, would eventually lose and the cost in lives would be horrendous.
You forget abut Australia....their "mandatory buyback" was basically, a confiscation.
No basically about it. They convinced people to register their guns then did a forced confiscation
Never register anything
I always thought of Aussies as rugged manly men, but guess they had been around sheep too long! Baaaaa.
Yeah- "mandatory buyback" would specifically be confiscation, just with some pretense of compensation attached (as an aside, several aussie friends tell me 'nobody' turned in their guns -no doubt that only goes as far as their acquaintances and maybe some of those people's acquaintances, plus some rumors; but from the few numbers I've seen as well, it looks like maybe 15-20% of just the guns the government already knew were out there got collected, and that sounds like they just declared a victory and left it at that.)
@@lieninger Pretty much. Though Australians were never as well armed as Americans, they still have enough guns privately circulating that their government worries about it.
Confiscation would look more like piles of politicians......
Let's hope so!
Careful now!!
And cops....
@@crazysquirrel9425yeah, let’s practice by playing the video game postal!
After a few days, there would be a shortage of people willing to do the confiscations, the funeral directors would be having a hey day.
They aren't getting funerals, they're getting bonfires.
@@drewwilliams9457😂
I've always wanted to start a coffin making business. I'm terrible at gold leafing but everything else I've got down.
Redcoats go to the chippers. Right into the lakes to feed the fishes.
Worked without much trouble during Katrina…🤔
We need more officers like you but t one with that much loyalty come very few and far between. Thank you for your service loyalty .
If it comes to that, my front yard is my own personal Concord bridge.
Learn how to make tannerite mines
Don't wait for them to come to YOUR house... better to stop them down the street at your neighbors'. Why let them put your family at risk?!
F-that! I have a much-MUCH larger radius! My minimum radius is a tad greater than 1000 yards.
I wouldn’t want the job of door knocking for people’s guns. Good luck to whoever’s gets that gig
they won't do it that way. They'll shut off the power/water and starve you out. They'll use their illegal immigrant army to enforce their illegal mandates.
10 bucks they’ll have blue hair and introduce themselves with their pronouns.
@@creepycraiyons3519 we can't get that lucky
I don't think kamala has enough friends to collect anyone's firearms
It would be less dangerous to walk around in the Gaza Strip than to have that job
450,000,000 guns in the US. Good luck.
most people will comply in fear because sheep will be sheep
ATF has an (illegal) database with nearly 1 Billion files (and counting).
750,000,000 actually!
Just like Canada
Wrong, massively wrong. It's the polar opposite, by a wide margin of 15%+ most are "on the fence" also beyond that margin, stonch anti gun people are the minority, period.
Confiscation would look exactly like Massachusetts, April 15, 1775. The first time the American people took up arms against an oppressive and tyrannical government. We all know how that worked out.
As a combat veteran, I've already made my peace with God. The question is, have you?
Yewtoob flagged your comment in a dropdown window asking if I felt like your comment was suitable.. I let them know it was very suitable. 🤘🤙🇺🇲
Thank you for your service i never served but will defend freedom next to any man the belives like do as well do most the people i know in gubtucky
Rah, Not one inch I wouldnt fight for.
Amen fellow cake eater lol
Semper Fi, brother.
Confiscation would look like a war on a house by house basis.
Confiscation would be a bloodbath.
I doubt it.
@@aquariumdude7829 Soros needs to find a better troll. You are definitely not worth the money he's paying you.
@@aquariumdude7829 LMAOO GET A JOB YOU HAVE 100+ COMMENTS ON THIS CHANNEL NOTHING BUT CRYING😂😂😂😂😂
And when you're doubts , come true , what then. @@aquariumdude7829
@@aquariumdude7829 That's because you will not live long enough to see it come to fruition
2005 Katrina. The national guard went door to door and confiscated all firearms. Most Americans do not know about this.