Yes Kia and Hyundai are definitely excelling in the tech and interior space but what you don’t see in Mazda (as far as I know ) is a recall of over 500 000 of vehicles engines catching fire.
True, a pretty public bummer; however, you see large preventative recalls from major automakers fairly frequently, sometimes in very scary sounding ways. Remember the whole Chevy Bolt might burn down your house recall? Not great, even though the likelihood was slim. But it's a fair point. Mazdas tend to be fairly reliable over time, at least as much as Honda. Thanks for watching!
Yup Kia and Hyundai wows you with the tech but I would not go near them, Mazda is doing the right thing by following Lexus foot steps make changes only when it becomes more reliable and not be the first to offer it.
@@mikezou9929 not on the same league buddy. LG and Samsung move large amounts of consumer tech, a few duds are expected but nothing close to what Kia and Hyundai are putting out which is a complete disgrace.
I’m just gonna say I just purchased a 2022 Mazda CX 5 premium. This car was never even on my radar, my best friend had on two of these cars and said that I would be crazy not to consider one. I had a Toyota RAV4 hybrid and a Toyota Prius hybrid both were within three years of this car and I must say Toyotas were like a tin can in comparison. The noise levels inside of both cars were off the charts there was so much road noise in both my Toyota Prius and my 2020 RAV4 hybrid. I have always been a Toyota fan but this Mazda has definitely changed my mind. Granted it’s not the fancy turbo model but remember I came from a Toyota Prius so I’m not that power-hungry. Driving it home from the dealer it was a 3 Hour Dr. and set the cruise control at 65 and I got 36 miles per gallon yes I varied my speed never going over 65 mph for optimal engine break-in. My best friend said if you don’t get the Mazda CX 5 with the Bose radio I would be very disappointed because I am a huge music fan. He was right absolutely so glad I got the Bose ❤️ ,is it a perfect SUV in my eyes almost, when you go on a road trip and all you hear is road noise it is not a good experience. Both of my Toyotas had horrible road noise. This Mazda is very quiet. If you haven’t driven a CX 5 ,I recommend this SUV .
I have a new cx5 and the headlights are the best I have ever had. The auto high beam works better than the Lexus and BMW’s I have had. I The CX5 is one of the best cars I have ever had 🇬🇧
I own a 2020 CX-5 Grand Touring Reserve. Love the handling, and the generous low end torque of the turbo. A driver's car disguised as a crossover. Thanks Mazda for adding luxury features even though it's not considered a luxury brand and not priced like one either.
The cx5 is more of a upscale near premium segment vs crv and rav4. Imagine if they would have replace the cx5 interior with the new cx60 interior it would leave the other 2 in the dust in terms of premium.
I bought mine when my son graduated. I placed the order in June and received my CX5 GS Mazda in Sept 2022. Love the look, stylish design, roof, luxury interior and spacious n great soft leather seats. Love the back, butt and steering wheel driving all heated are great for winter. The signals, automatic wiper and lights are fabulous. My son and I love this car and got it for $42K CAD. It is a good buy according to me. RAV4 was $50+ not as attractive as CX GS Mazda in white. Zoom zoom
I have a 2016 CX-5 and waiting for my 2022 CX-5. Mazda email says that the vehicle has just come off the assembly line. The CX-5 has been a great vehicle to own and drive. I can carry my full size bike without taking off any wheels. The way space is measured in vehicles sometimes does not mean much. The RAV4 looks like a tractor compared to the CX-5. The heavy front end on Kia and Hyundai vehicles are going to date very quickly. You did not spend much time on drive train comparisons. For the price of the CX-5, it still has a very good engine/gearbox combination.
I’m not 100% sure that everyone wants huge screens. It’s easy for manufacturers to bolt on a screen too; but we have already seen that physical controls for air conditioning/heating return in some models. I think the minimalist look become less popular.
I would tend to agree. I kind of prefer some type of interface to manipulate a screen closer to the driver’s line of sight… but maybe I’m in the minority. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
you are totally right about everything, but you can't really buy a sportage at this price. MSRP is comparable, but dealers will add market adjusted price and these adjustments are insane like 5k$ or even 8k$. Also Kia is not cheaper, CX-5 top trims has turbo, while Sportage's trims doesn't have powerful motor. If you compare cx-5 premium plus and good trim on sportage they are about the same msrp. For cx-5 you usually can still find something in stock for MSRP.
I think the problem for Mazda is that most mainstream buyers will find the Kia’s engine options strong enough for them and the turbo power in the CX-5 won’t be the draw. As for pricing, the Kia IS more affordable if you go by MSRP. The reason I continue to do so is because the dealership model as it stands is outdated and ridiculous, and their price gouging tactics are going to have long term negative consequences even if they’re posting short term gains. I will NEVER buy a vehicle from a dealer attempting to use these tactics currently. I hope more people do the same. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
Thanks for review. Driving previous 2018 cx5 considering to buy new one, probably will stay with Mazda because of the steering. All these screens and features in different models don’t deliver me joy of driving, but Mazda does. And it’s wonderful
Thanks for watching! Biggest complaint about the CX-5 (got an update video coming this weekend) is the seats. The bottom cushion is too short for tall people, and if you have back issues, you'll notice it. Just FYI
Hi Jax, a thorough review as always. The pros and cons you covered are spot on 👍. While the CX-5 certainly lacks some driver assistance tech, it makes up for it in the driving experience and feel of quality. To me the biggest stand-out is how light the CX-5 feels to handle. I recently test drove the Genesis GV70 with the V6 engine, plenty of power but the driver inputs feel incohesive, it's like the steering and gas & brake pedals were designed by two different teams, the chassis was also floaty and hollow, maybe I was just not used to their tuning. Interior design is stylish, but some of the touch points like the center control where the AC buttons are, feel flimsy and cheap (it moves when I touch it), turned out to be let down for me. When stepped back in the CX-5, at least the Mazda is screwed very well together, despite some "cheating" in material use as you mentioned. And the driver inputs are much more natural. Did you find that to be the case when you reviewed it? You seemed to really like the GV70.
You're right: I really love the GV70. But the CX-5, despite what Mazda wants to say, still competes in the mainstream category, and as such it's an excellent vehicle compared against that market segment. I think my overall thesis is that if Mazda truly wants to make moves upmarket, it's going to have to be an all-encompassing attack. They can no longer coast on pretty exterior design, peerless handling dynamics, and above average interior materials... that disguise a relatively lacking tech package and options list. Sadly, most mainstream customers just don't value dynamic excellence the way Mazda needs them to in order to win.
Jax, excellent review. I own a 2016 CX5 Grand Touring with 29K miles. I thought you might have mentioned the elephant in the room regarding the Lifetime transmission fluid in the 6 speed. It is in my opinion a marketing gimmick to lead consumers into the belief of lower maintenance costs. Ok fine, but back it up like the Koreans do with a 10 year 100K drivetrain warranty. My dealer won't change the fluid, the one in the next town will. My dealer advises not to do it and the other one is going against Mazda's recommendations. The Mazda has great reliability and I want to keep it for a long time, but the trans fluid thing sticks in my mind. 5K to replace it if fails. I really like the fact that mine with it's NA 2.5 doesn't have cylinder deactivation or start/stop technology. I know the turbos don't either, but I don't feel the need for turbo in the CX5 nor the added expense in purchase, fuel economy and repair costs.
Interesting point. I don’t personally know anyone who has experienced a problem with that, but it’s certainly worth noting and researching. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
Great review but I just want to make a point that 2023 Mazda CX-5 Premium Plus DOES HAVE lane keep assist/centering. Why are you saying it doesn't have it?
I think I should have clarified: it does have a lane keeping assist feature (which is decent at best), but it doesn’t have a steering assist function to maintain lanes over longer distances or around curves, which at this price point starts to become expected. Sorry for the confusion! Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
@@jax1079 I want to ask you…in about a month I’ll be picking up my new CX-5. Is there a way I can text you later if I have a question about a car feature? I’m a new driver and feel like this will be like learning how to fly an airbus (with all these features) LOL.
@@purrfectstormz8225 I’m taking it to the dealership on Wednesday because the delay is getting progressively worse so if you want I can let you know what the mechanic says.
I tried to buy the CX-5 three times last year when I was looking for a new crossover. I found the driver's position inconvenient for me. I didn't like the interior in general but I would close my eyes to that. I would also close my eyes to the crammed rear seats and awfully looking rear exterior part. Why I would do that? Because at that time I was under anti-CVT paranoia (added correction: I put "anti-CRV paranoia" - it was a misprint. I meant CVT). The attractive points were a regular transmission and a regular engine. Was the driver's seat really inconvenient? I tried a few times with the same result. Then I started from fresh. After thorough research and test drives I decided to give a try Subaru's CVT as an exception. A few month later I came back to Mazda dealership to get another look. My Outback was waiting for me at the parking lot. I set in the CX-5... After the Outback, driving this car would be a punishment. What a difference! I have been driving Outback for a year now. My friend tried it and rushed to the same dealer and bought... the Forester. Since then the cars are best friends - almost like our friends and us. I drive the Forester from time to time. No comparison with the CX-5 either. For the record: I have never thought about buying a Subaru. I've had three Hondas, so my first option was the CR-V. And it was my disappointment: CVT+Turbo=No go. I still don't accept CVTs with the only exception for Subaru.
Hope you have better luck than most of us. We owned 2 Subarus. 2007 outback & 2003 Forester. Both were unreliable. At 30,000 km the outback was consuming oil. The Forester had fuel line leaks, oil consumption, wheel bearing, clutch problems. Every service was 300 dollars as well. Family members have Mazda CX 5. My nephew's has 320,000 km.changed only spark plugs. My wife had 240,00 before trading. She did not likes the seat. So maybe seat could be an issue but for reliable manufacturer, Mazda are much better than Subaru. The drive of the Mazda is much more enjoyable. Not to mention the CVT problems for Subaru. Just Google on it. In closing, I do hope you have better luck
@@ontarioman6301 Thank you! My Honda CR-V had 325 000 km when I bought a replacement for my lovely Honda. I wanted another CR-V but.... CVT+Turbo=no deal. The Rav4 turned out to be too noisy. The CX-5 had uncomfortable driver's seat.... The Rogue had CVT (the worst of them) and 4* safety rating instead of 5*. A real CR-V is now larger than I need and is called Honda Passport. But I need a compact crossover. So I bought the Outback. My closest friend has had 4th gen Forester for 6 years with no issues. I am not a Subaru man. Honestly I wouldn't imagine buying a Subaru a few years ago. But the 6th gen Outback is such a striking difference from the previous generation that I decided to take a plunge. No issues so far. #1 car in it's class (compact crossover). How long will it last? We'll see. th-cam.com/video/LpOi-Jj5V8U/w-d-xo.html
Jax, I really enjoyed your evaluation of the CX-5. You clearly showed your knowledge of this cars strengths, weaknesses and where Mazda needs to improve on the tech side to keep pace with the competition. I like everything about the Turbo, but I wish the tech and safety systems were on par with the competition, and that my keep me from purchasing one. Maybe I will wait for next years model to see if they address those areas.
Thank you! I agree: I really like the CX-5 (and Mazda in general), but I’m waiting to see if their next gen tech (and growing relationship with Toyota) helps bring them up to speed. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
It’s more of a lane bump rather than a steering assist mode. In this class, it needs to have a more active steering assist in my opinion. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Could you please address the rust problems (underneath) the car/crossover SUV Maza's have. Also, I have read complaints about the giant size key fob with buttons sticking out on the side. I read that owners were unknowingly unlocking trunks and other stuff because of the buttons stick out. Plus, you still have to open with the key. At least this is what I have read. I looked into purchasing a new 2023 Honda CRV-EX-L, but was turned off when I read that they went to the CVT. Plus, a 1.5L engine! I currently own a 2014 Honda CRV-EX-L with a 2.5L engine and a 5-speed automatic transmission. It only has 33,614 miles on it. I know I should probably keep it for the long haul, but I got a hankering for a new one. But that idea is dead since the new CRV's have the 1.5L engine with CVT. They won't last long or be reliable IMHO.
Haven’t heard anything about the rust issue, myself, so I would confirm the source on that. The fob is normal sized but the side buttons can be a minor irritation (at most). I’d probably just keep yours since it’s practically brand new, but I don’t think you have anything to fear from Honda CVTs. They’re not Nissan.
320 lbs or torque when using Premium. The 310 is when using regular. And the cluster, if you press info button, the center cluster will change a little. It will display more animations with the radar system. But yea a little too simple and outdated. Still a great little SUV. Enjoying mine!
Even though I’m a RAV4 fan, I got admit the handling of the Mazda is good and the front of the vehicle is very appealing. But as yet no hybrids. I believe Mazda will soon be adopting the Rav4 hybrid power train. Nice vehicle the Mazda. NZ
That would be really great for Mazda if they could cooperate with Toyota and leverage some of their hybrid tech. That’s the missing piece for their SUVs. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
Hey Jax, not sure if I missed this or misremembering, doesn't the turbo do 320 lb-ft of torque with 93 octane? 310 was mentioned in the video. Also, I love the production on your video. Sound levels, camera switches, all made it really fluid.
Thank you! 🙏🏻 And yes, I was incorrect. I had written down the wrong torque number and didn’t catch it. It’s 320 on premium, which is awesome. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
The refreshed head+tail lights seem like they were updated just for the sake of updating, and don’t actually go with the overall look of the exterior design the way the original ones do. So the 2022 models just look cheap now (in my opinion.) That upcoming cx60 or w/e it’s called looks very interesting to me, can’t wait to see that.
I'd like to know the cargo capacity with rear seats down, whether the seats fold flat (can you sleep in the back), and can the spare tire well hold a full-size spare (not just a compact spare).
What I don't like about adaptive cruise control is that it is too aggressive in applying the brakes. My nephew has an Audi and it is the same. You will need to replace brake pads and rotors much too soon if you use it a lot, unless there is very little traffic ahead of you. It waits too long to slow up when approaching another vehicle and then has to brake much harder than you would if you just eased up on the gas or gently tapped the brakes.
@@robertdevoy3119 All of them will jump on the brakes when someone cuts you off. Hyundai and Kia are solid, especially Genesis. I like Ford’s as well. Acura also seems to get it mostly right. I’m mainly looking at the smoothness of braking in non emergency situations and how quickly and smoothly the vehicle accelerated after slowing down. Just my seat of the pants observations.
@@jax1079 Yes.... the Mazda is good at responding to emergencies, but not so good with normal adaptive cruise control duties. I only use it when traffic is very light. Actually, I love my car and have very few nits to pick. Even the 6 speed tranny is great, especially, with the turbo. But I wonder if the turbo would be necessary with an equally good 8 speed? Perhaps, better gas mileage at the top end and more grunt in the low end and midrange.
I am not able to decide between a used 2020 Honda CRV touring with 28000 miles and 2022 Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium Plus with 9000 miles. Mazda being $2000 more than Honda. Any suggestions. This is for my first time teen driver.
Always go cheaper and older for a teen driver. They’ll inevitably ding and scratch it up with their mistakes. No point in getting anything too nice for a new driver. The CR-V is roomier anyway, and just as safe.
@@dogsarefun2 That’s certainly compelling, but unless you need the Subie’s more off-road ready awd (although Mazda’s is actually quite good now as well), I think you’ll find the Mazda more satisfying-with a much nicer interior.
@@jax1079 did some research on the "lifetime warranty". See last paragraph... If the Administrator was Subaru it would be a no brainer. NOT A SERVICE CONTRACT OR INSURANCE - Customer acknowledges that this Lifetime Limited Powertrain Warranty is being provided at NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE and is not a Service Contract and is not insurance. DETAILS AND COVERAGES OF WARRANTY Engine: Cylinder block and head and all internal parts, intake manifold, timing gears and gaskets, timing chain/belt and cover, flywheel, valve covers, oil pan, oil pump, engine mounts, turbocharger housing and all internal parts, supercharger housing and all internal parts, engine control computer, water pump, fuel pump, seals and gaskets. Transmission & Transaxle: Case and all internal parts, torque converter, clutch cover, transmission mounts, transfer case and all internal parts, engine control computer, seals and gaskets. Front Wheel Drive System: Final drive housing and all internal parts, axle shafts, drive shaft, constant velocity joints, front hub and bearings, seals and gaskets. Rear Wheel Drive System: Axle housing & all internal parts, propeller shaft, u-joints, axle shaft, drive shaft, bearings, supports, seals and gaskets. NOT COVERED UNDER WARRANTY: This warranty does not cover damage or failures resulting directly or indirectly from fire, accidents, theft, abuse, negligence, misuse (racing or overloading), improper repairs, alteration or tampering, including installation of non-genuine Subaru accessories, lack of proper maintenance, including use of fluids other than those specified in the Owners Manual, installation of nongenuine Subaru Parts, airborne chemicals, tree sap, road debris (including stone chips), rail dust, salt, hail, floods, wind storms, water contamination, lightning and other environmental conditions. TIRES: Tires are covered by a separate warranty provided by the tire manufacturer. NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR: Noise, vibration, cosmetic conditions and other deterioration caused by normal wear and tear. MAINTENANCE EXPENSE: Normal maintenance services such as engine tune-ups, replacement of fluid and filters, lubrication, cleaning and polishing, replacement of spark plugs and fuses, replacement of worn wiper blades, brake pads/linings & clutch linings. VEHICLE WITH ALTERED ODOMETER: A vehicle on which the odometer has been altered so that actual mileage cannot be determined. SALVAGE OR TOTAL LOSS OF VEHICLE: Any vehicle that has ever been issued a salvage title or similar title under any state law or has ever been declared a total loss or equivalent by a financial institution or insurer, such as by payment for a claim in lieu of repairs because the cost or repairs exceeded the cash value of the vehicle. INCIDENTAL DAMAGES: Incidental or consequential damages associated with a vehicle failure. Such damages include but are not limited to inconvenience, the cost of transportation, telephone calls and lodging, the loss of personal or commercial property, and the loss of pay or revenue. WHERE YOU ARE COVERED: This Lifetime Limited Powertrain Warranty applies to breakdowns occurring within the continental United States of America, Hawaii and Canada. DEDUCTIBLE - $100 is the amount you must pay for covered repairs per covered component. If your cost is a warranty deductible charge imposed by the vehicle manufacturer, this Lifetime Limited Powertrain Warranty will pay for the manufacturers deductible. ADMINISTRATOR - Warranty Automotive Services Corporation is the administrator of this Lifetime Limited Powertrain Warranty. This Lifetime Limited Powertrain Warranty is provided by Patriot Subaru at NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE to the New Subaru Vehicle Purchaser. This Lifetime Limited Powertrain Warranty is not a Service Contract and is not insurance.
Yes and no. It sometimes seems to be an issue with automakers (GM) that needs fixing, and even Mazda has recalled cars for issues with CD. That being said, the tech has no been around for a while, so those issues have been sorted and it should perform more reliably. I wouldn’t necessarily worry about it since the overall reliability ratings and data on most Mazdas is pretty darn good. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Kia and Hyundai look futuristic but they won't age well. Mazda is a timeless design, they've been using the same silhouette since 2014 and still relevant today
Very on point review!! Mazda need to step up on the technology side! Other than that everything is great! The style and the materials!! And of course the handling and driving dynamics is better than other mainstream competitor.
Great video! The Mazda CX-5 is my favorite vehicle period! I have the 22 CX-5 Premium Love it but I hate the new pizza wheels. What was Mazda thinking? They should have kept the old wheels and also added a digital speedometer. I love the new CX-60. It looks like an extra upscale CX-5. Too bad it'd bit coming to the states!!! 😔😔😔
Thank you! There are some new Mazda vehicles on the way based on the new vehicle architecture, so we should see a very similar updated SUV in the near future. It's going to be a VERY important vehicle for the brand since so much is riding on this new platform. Hopefully, it's a big hit for Mazda. thanks for watching!
You definitely have an interesting perspective on this vehicle we both share an affinity for! Looks like you’re in my neck of the woods which was cool to see 😃. You did a great job, I know how much work goes into these videos. Have any videos editing needs? hit me up …
Mazda cx5 for 2022 does not have wireless Apple CarPlay. You have to plug your lightning cable to car USB causing wear to your plug on your phone. Ever time you get into your car you have to plug in. So much for the advantage of having wireless charging. You still have to plug in. 2021 had wireless CarPlay but they had problems do they removed it in 2022. Instead of fixing the problem they went backwards and removed. Come on Mazda get with technology. This is disappointing. Please come up with a fix and do an update to the 2022’s so there is wireless CarPlay.
I don’t disagree with the sentiment, but the idea that plugging your phone into the car will wear on it is not really a problem. It’s just an inconvenience, which I get. Mazda needs to update the infotainment for sure. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I have to disagree on the design. It's showing its age now. And really Mazda needs to more styling to be more competitive and while at that at add the touch screen functionality.
I don’t disagree, but I do think it’s impressive that the CX-5 has remained so generally attractive and stylish as long as it has. Mazda’s next phase will be critical to their success, for sure. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
The Kia is over 1 second slower to 60 and doesn't have a larger engine unless you go hybrid. I will admit the tech looks great in the Kia. I just couldn't get past the front end styling.
True, but most people don’t prioritize performance, and I think the styling will always be a matter of taste. I think Kia is taking risks, which I definitely respect.
@@jax1079 Agreed. I had a deposit on a CX-5 and a Sportage. I already own Mazdas and decided that driving dynamics and the upscale interior / exterior styling were more important BUT it was a close call.
@@lesm285 Great for you, the consumer, but if Mazda wishes to be cross shopped with BMW and Mercedes (much less Acura and Lexus), they're going to have to raise their game... and not a parallel move like the CX-50, either. The new platform will be critical to their aspirational success. I hope they make it; I'm a big Mazda fan, myself.
Always the best commentary. We need to root Mazda on as they offer something completely different in driving experience than anyone else. I do love the simplicity of the gauge cluster, as it just has that classic and elegant look that is easy on the eyes day and night. And cool that you mentioned the bottom hinged gas pedal, another cool oddity that also shows up in mini coopers, which now that I think about it is another cool niche company whose models change very slowly. Curious about their Skyactive x and why is has nothing hit the states yet. Without it Mazda will need to get that hybrid system from Toyota.
I kind of want Toyota to swallow Mazda honestly, let them continue work on their RWD lineup, and move Lexus even farther upmarket. There's no reason why Lexus models should have lightly disguised Toyota infotainment systems, even in the newest models. Or... (and this would never happen), flip it and move Mazda WAY upmarket. They're more stylish than Lexus, will probably handle better, and have a bit more freedom for experimentation than what the Lexus brand symbolizes (although I could be wrong because the LC is dope).
@@jax1079 none of those moves help the consumer in any way, shape or form. I take it that you're a Toyota shareholder? Otherwise a very puzzling suggestion to come from a consumer.
@@ShaferHart They’ve already collaborated on several models, and it allows a smaller more interesting company to stay afloat by aligning with a much larger company in need of some sportiness. Then again, with the recent excellence of the GR models, Mazda’s shot might have passed.
@jax1079 I had a 1978 Datsun 280z 2+2 and thought the same thing ... but somehow my sister managed the back seat behind me lol 😆 😅 😂 Currently I have 2 Avalons and am considering selling the 08.. I'm considering the CX5 or another newer Avalon or ES350.. thanks for your reply!
Really just a great review. I own a 2020 CX5 reserve and so am very familiar with the strengths and weaknesses of the vehicle. My previous car was a BMW 3 series and I do miss the driving dynamics but the Mazda does come close. Close but not quite there. Upon lease ending I will be looking hard at the new CX70. It will have to elevate driving feel to nearer the BMW for me to pull the trigger. RWD and a 6 cylinder engine will help.
Thank you! Yes, I think the next gen of Mazda vehicles is going to be make or break in terms of their quest for premium. Looking forward to getting behind the wheel of them for sure. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
Not sure why you criticised the transmission. Lots of people don't want a problematic and clunky DCT/CVT. The standard torque converter gear box is actually a plus for these cars.
Not saying you need to go dual clutch, just that the Mazda's ancient six speed is getting outgunned among automatic transmissions in terms of performance and efficiency
I subtle observation but one that I think Mazda should consider if they want to be taken seriously as a more premium brand. Those details matter. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Maybe if you would get a ticket for tailgating (fine and points off your license) then you would be okay with distance of radar cruise control. Don't look at you DAMN phone while you're driving. Lane centering will most likely train people to be lazy and dependent on technology, and they won't keep their hands on the steering wheel.
Personally i prefer less tech and its why im considering getting one in addition to its high reliability. So much tech will be a big headache later on as car ages. Less is sometimes more. Ty for your review
Thanks for the great review. I value the CX-5's handsome looks - it's great driving experience and that turbo engine. Enough for me to overlook the lack of technology. Rav4, Tucson, Sportage are just plain ugly compared to the CX-5. I do have the 2022 lower trim with the na engine, I'm trading that in for this and can't wait 😀
@@jax1079 You pronounced Mazda incorrectly. LOL. Japanese pronounce it Martsz-da. You said maaz·duh. Japanese also say the word twice as fast as you did. But then that's not my problem.
320 torque not 310 , Transmission is made by Mazda and is very different than an average , torque converter /clutch in the middle /transmission... all one piece .
You simply won't get the perfection of a 52K Lexus for the price of 40K. That is the trade off. But I think Mazda found a good niche there which gives you a lot of car for the money. As far at the competition goes, I still don't see a reason to take a chance on a KIA unless you are planning to get rid of it after five years. Reviews like this put no emphasis on owning a car beyond the five year mark. Reliability ratings are much more important to regular car owners, and I am talking about REAL reliability ratings and not the JD Power kind that car manufacturers can purchase.
I don’t disagree, but I would point out that there are WAY more people getting rid of cars between 5-10 years than there used to be, and many people (for better or worse) choose to lease vehicles and rotate them. Look, I’m like you: we currently have an 11 year old Chevy Suburban with 170k miles on it as our main family car. We KEEP vehicles. But lots of people don’t, so longevity is certainly part of the discussion but not the only selling point. (For example, we got my 17 year old a Toyota RAV4 for that very reason, but many of her friends drive Jeeps 😬)
The front of the Cx5 looks great.... the back is MEH in terms of design kinda has looked like this for 'many years'... NEGATIVES (👎)Infotainment😑Wheel control is distracting and difficult to use whole moving... a touchscreen setup is much better . Rear Leg Room (👎) my legs are pinned once I sit behind myself and I'm over 6ft. If someone my height sits behind me.. it will be an uncomfortable ride for us both (this applies to the CX9 as well ) The trunk space is too small.Reverse camera (👎) its awful to look at... its like the vehicle needs to be about 4 inches long. This is rental at best..It would be better to buy a Rav4.
Yes and no. The RAV4 is more spacious but currently comes with Toyota’s horribly outdated infotainment system that is no better than the Mazda system, plus the interior is nowhere nearly as nice as the Mazda. The CX-5 is big enough for most people versus its main competitors, but they’re evolving more quickly than the Mazda. That’s where the CX-5 needs to be careful. There will be new versions of all its competitors soon. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
@@jax1079 Fair point Jax, but what do you think of the 2023, or USA might call it the 2024 infotainment cockpit of the RAV4.they’ll be using the one that the Lexus has. Can you look at the new images and let me know what you think of the future RAV4 cockpit.
Competition is a wonderful thing. The others upped their game and so Mazda must do so also. Too bad Mazda is slow to get it done and is nearly always playing catch up, especially, on the tech front. I have a 2019 Signature and love the quality, the driving pleasure, and upscale feel. However, their nav system stinks and I use Android Auto instead which is way more accurate in getting me to my destination. Hopefully, they will maintain this quality feel with the CX-70, but it sure is a long wait. And I hope they don't force me to buy a combo gas/electric engine when upgrading to the CX-70 or else I'll just keep what I have now.
I am looking forward to the CX-70 as well. I think most brands will be moving towards some form of gas/electric hybrid systems in the future, but perhaps they will do it in the same way Toyota is offering full EVs, plug-in hybrids, hybrid assist, and true hybrids. I like that approach because it keeps an element of choice in the market; however, I'm not sure Mazda has the resources to pull something like that off. Time will tell. Thanks for watching!
Addressed it in an earlier review of the CX-5, and yes, it is tight; however, if you’re planning on carrying four full-sized adults in your SUV very often, the CX-5 probably isn’t on your list. The back seat is fine for kids, though. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Your review is close to the mark but I wouldn't call it "Still the best barely" and here is why..... I would rather a CX 5 over a Sportage or Tucson any day of the year. I owned a Tucson and the dual clutch is horrible at low speeds plus interior switches on the steering wheel and electronic brake kept breaking and were not cheap tog et replaced. Add to that the door entry buttons/solenoids died and had to be replaced 3 times all I can say is never again. Buy a Hyundai or Kia at your own peril, give me a quality Mazda please even with reduced tech, tech is not be all and end all but a quiet, smooth ride in a car that doesn't jerk around at low speeds or whine like a stuffed pig and handles beautifully is the car for me. I also test drove a sportage and while I did like the screens the rest was pretty average as far as quality of the finish and quietness of the car and ride went. We chose the CX 5 over the Sportage, Seltos, Mitsubish Outlander. We also test drove the Lexus NX and RX for completeness and comparison and honestly if I could afford an NX I would get that without question but to me the CX 5 is almost as good as far as ride and comfort goes.
I see your point for sure, but I’d consider the CR-V and RAV4 to both be bigger players in the segment built on years of long term quality and reliability. The CR-V is the best all arounder (although I haven’t tested the new one yet), and the RAV4 is the best hybrid, general use, and by far most reliable (we own one, full disclosure). I actually really like the Koreans and said the Tucson PHEV was generally better than the RAV4 Prime to live with, but if I was spending my own money… it would be on the Prime. I’d get a CX-5 before just about anything myself, but the RAV4 was for our 17 year old to drive so I wanted something that would last longer than the Earth. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I mean, it’s been out a while for sure, but I don’t think Mazda’s kodo design language ever looks old and tired. Could just be me, though. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Why do a review on the signature when the majority of buyers cant afford it? Personally I think the premium package has enough bells and whistles. You are way late to the game. There have been numerous reviews on the CX5.
The average new car price in America is over $40k, sooo…. I’m guessing more than half the country can afford this vehicle (or at least they’re willing to get into a five year loan for it).
Test drive them all and decided on CX 5 Premium Plus..Hyundai and Kia look nice but to many issues..Honda and Toyota way overpriced. CX 5 best value for the price. I just don't reccomended the Turbo motor due to some fairly major issues. If its a lot of power you want buy something with 3.0/ 3.6 liter V6
Yes Kia and Hyundai are definitely excelling in the tech and interior space but what you don’t see in Mazda (as far as I know ) is a recall of over 500 000 of vehicles engines catching fire.
True, a pretty public bummer; however, you see large preventative recalls from major automakers fairly frequently, sometimes in very scary sounding ways. Remember the whole Chevy Bolt might burn down your house recall? Not great, even though the likelihood was slim. But it's a fair point. Mazdas tend to be fairly reliable over time, at least as much as Honda. Thanks for watching!
right on, same with all korean products, like Lg, samsung their quality is the worst... all break so easily
Yup Kia and Hyundai wows you with the tech but I would not go near them, Mazda is doing the right thing by following Lexus foot steps make changes only when it becomes more reliable and not be the first to offer it.
I just got rid of a 2011 Kia Sportage and bought a new Mazda CX-5 😀😀😀
@@mikezou9929 not on the same league buddy. LG and Samsung move large amounts of consumer tech, a few duds are expected but nothing close to what Kia and Hyundai are putting out which is a complete disgrace.
I’m just gonna say I just purchased a 2022 Mazda CX 5 premium. This car was never even on my radar, my best friend had on two of these cars and said that I would be crazy not to consider one. I had a Toyota RAV4 hybrid and a Toyota Prius hybrid both were within three years of this car and I must say Toyotas were like a tin can in comparison. The noise levels inside of both cars were off the charts there was so much road noise in both my Toyota Prius and my 2020 RAV4 hybrid. I have always been a Toyota fan but this Mazda has definitely changed my mind. Granted it’s not the fancy turbo model but remember I came from a Toyota Prius so I’m not that power-hungry. Driving it home from the dealer it was a 3 Hour Dr. and set the cruise control at 65 and I got 36 miles per gallon yes I varied my speed never going over 65 mph for optimal engine break-in. My best friend said if you don’t get the Mazda CX 5 with the Bose radio I would be very disappointed because I am a huge music fan. He was right absolutely so glad I got the Bose ❤️ ,is it a perfect SUV in my eyes almost, when you go on a road trip and all you hear is road noise it is not a good experience. Both of my Toyotas had horrible road noise. This Mazda is very quiet. If you haven’t driven a CX 5 ,I recommend this SUV .
It's still a fantastic SUV. Glad you like it, and thanks for watching!
I have a new cx5 and the headlights are the best I have ever had. The auto high beam works better than the Lexus and BMW’s I have had. I
The CX5 is one of the best cars I have ever had 🇬🇧
Sounds like you’re a fan. Glad you like it, and thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I own a 2020 CX-5 Grand Touring Reserve. Love the handling, and the generous low end torque of the turbo. A driver's car disguised as a crossover. Thanks Mazda for adding luxury features even though it's not considered a luxury brand and not priced like one either.
Owners make for the best endorsements. Glad you like it, and thanks for watching!
I have been a die hard Honda fan but I drove a CX5 and was blown away. I am now considering purchasing one
It’s quite good. If you want a bit more style, don’t sleep on the CX-50. It’s also great. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
The cx5 is more of a upscale near premium segment vs crv and rav4. Imagine if they would have replace the cx5 interior with the new cx60 interior it would leave the other 2 in the dust in terms of premium.
Absolutely! But the next ones HAVE to be good. Mazda needs to win based on their huge investments in these new platforms. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
I bought mine when my son graduated. I placed the order in June and received my CX5 GS Mazda in Sept 2022.
Love the look, stylish design, roof, luxury interior and spacious n great soft leather seats.
Love the back, butt and steering wheel driving all heated are great for winter.
The signals, automatic wiper and lights are fabulous.
My son and I love this car and got it for $42K CAD.
It is a good buy according to me. RAV4 was $50+ not as attractive as CX GS Mazda in white.
Zoom zoom
Nice! Glad to hear you like it, and thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Bought a 2022 mazda cx 5 and let's just say ,i don't regret it even a bit . Best car 💯
Glad you like it! Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I have a 2016 CX-5 and waiting for my 2022 CX-5. Mazda email says that the vehicle has just come off the assembly line.
The CX-5 has been a great vehicle to own and drive. I can carry my full size bike without taking off any wheels. The way space is measured in vehicles sometimes does not mean much.
The RAV4 looks like a tractor compared to the CX-5. The heavy front end on Kia and Hyundai vehicles are going to date very quickly.
You did not spend much time on drive train comparisons. For the price of the CX-5, it still has a very good engine/gearbox combination.
I agree! Good trade in. Hope you enjoy your new CX-5, and thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I’m not 100% sure that everyone wants huge screens. It’s easy for manufacturers to bolt on a screen too; but we have already seen that physical controls for air conditioning/heating return in some models. I think the minimalist look become less popular.
I would tend to agree. I kind of prefer some type of interface to manipulate a screen closer to the driver’s line of sight… but maybe I’m in the minority. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
you are totally right about everything, but you can't really buy a sportage at this price. MSRP is comparable, but dealers will add market adjusted price and these adjustments are insane like 5k$ or even 8k$.
Also Kia is not cheaper, CX-5 top trims has turbo, while Sportage's trims doesn't have powerful motor. If you compare cx-5 premium plus and good trim on sportage they are about the same msrp.
For cx-5 you usually can still find something in stock for MSRP.
I think the problem for Mazda is that most mainstream buyers will find the Kia’s engine options strong enough for them and the turbo power in the CX-5 won’t be the draw. As for pricing, the Kia IS more affordable if you go by MSRP. The reason I continue to do so is because the dealership model as it stands is outdated and ridiculous, and their price gouging tactics are going to have long term negative consequences even if they’re posting short term gains. I will NEVER buy a vehicle from a dealer attempting to use these tactics currently. I hope more people do the same. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
I like that you reviewed the top of the line on this model. Great review!
Thank you! And thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
Thanks for review. Driving previous 2018 cx5 considering to buy new one, probably will stay with Mazda because of the steering. All these screens and features in different models don’t deliver me joy of driving, but Mazda does. And it’s wonderful
That’s what Mazda does better than anyone else. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
Thanks for the review. I’m 6’7 and was looking for a car I can fit in without getting a car that wasn’t up to standard. Legend.
Thanks for watching! Biggest complaint about the CX-5 (got an update video coming this weekend) is the seats. The bottom cushion is too short for tall people, and if you have back issues, you'll notice it. Just FYI
@@jax1079 Thank you for the tip.
Hi Jax, a thorough review as always. The pros and cons you covered are spot on 👍.
While the CX-5 certainly lacks some driver assistance tech, it makes up for it in the driving experience and feel of quality. To me the biggest stand-out is how light the CX-5 feels to handle.
I recently test drove the Genesis GV70 with the V6 engine, plenty of power but the driver inputs feel incohesive, it's like the steering and gas & brake pedals were designed by two different teams, the chassis was also floaty and hollow, maybe I was just not used to their tuning. Interior design is stylish, but some of the touch points like the center control where the AC buttons are, feel flimsy and cheap (it moves when I touch it), turned out to be let down for me. When stepped back in the CX-5, at least the Mazda is screwed very well together, despite some "cheating" in material use as you mentioned. And the driver inputs are much more natural. Did you find that to be the case when you reviewed it? You seemed to really like the GV70.
You're right: I really love the GV70. But the CX-5, despite what Mazda wants to say, still competes in the mainstream category, and as such it's an excellent vehicle compared against that market segment. I think my overall thesis is that if Mazda truly wants to make moves upmarket, it's going to have to be an all-encompassing attack. They can no longer coast on pretty exterior design, peerless handling dynamics, and above average interior materials... that disguise a relatively lacking tech package and options list. Sadly, most mainstream customers just don't value dynamic excellence the way Mazda needs them to in order to win.
Jax, excellent review. I own a 2016 CX5 Grand Touring with 29K miles. I thought you might have mentioned the elephant in the room regarding the Lifetime transmission fluid in the 6 speed. It is in my opinion a marketing gimmick to lead consumers into the belief of lower maintenance costs. Ok fine, but back it up like the Koreans do with a 10 year 100K drivetrain warranty. My dealer won't change the fluid, the one in the next town will. My dealer advises not to do it and the other one is going against Mazda's recommendations. The Mazda has great reliability and I want to keep it for a long time, but the trans fluid thing sticks in my mind. 5K to replace it if fails. I really like the fact that mine with it's NA 2.5 doesn't have cylinder deactivation or start/stop technology. I know the turbos don't either, but I don't feel the need for turbo in the CX5 nor the added expense in purchase,
fuel economy and repair costs.
Interesting point. I don’t personally know anyone who has experienced a problem with that, but it’s certainly worth noting and researching. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
Great review but I just want to make a point that 2023 Mazda CX-5 Premium Plus DOES HAVE lane keep assist/centering. Why are you saying it doesn't have it?
I think I should have clarified: it does have a lane keeping assist feature (which is decent at best), but it doesn’t have a steering assist function to maintain lanes over longer distances or around curves, which at this price point starts to become expected. Sorry for the confusion! Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
@@jax1079 Oh I see, thanks! Btw, I do very much like how thorough you are in your review- great job!
@@jax1079 I want to ask you…in about a month I’ll be picking up my new CX-5. Is there a way I can text you later if I have a question about a car feature? I’m a new driver and feel like this will be like learning how to fly an airbus (with all these features) LOL.
I just bought a new 2022 cx5 and there is a delay in acceleration, anyone else have a problem with that?
Turbo lag? Or a legitimate delay?
@@jax1079 Legitimate delay like when I’m trying to merge into a highway.
Yes I feel that also I do not have a Turbo. I have the 2022 premium
@@purrfectstormz8225 I’m taking it to the dealership on Wednesday because the delay is getting progressively worse so if you want I can let you know what the mechanic says.
So what they say?
There's a setting in the infotainment system to change the sensitivity of the blind spot monitoring system.
Nice! Thanks for the tip! I think my press car was set to “Anything All the Time” 😂
I love the front grille😀
It’s a good looking vehicle. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I tried to buy the CX-5 three times last year when I was looking for a new crossover. I found the driver's position inconvenient for me. I didn't like the interior in general but I would close my eyes to that. I would also close my eyes to the crammed rear seats and awfully looking rear exterior part. Why I would do that? Because at that time I was under anti-CVT paranoia (added correction: I put "anti-CRV paranoia" - it was a misprint. I meant CVT). The attractive points were a regular transmission and a regular engine. Was the driver's seat really inconvenient? I tried a few times with the same result. Then I started from fresh. After thorough research and test drives I decided to give a try Subaru's CVT as an exception. A few month later I came back to Mazda dealership to get another look. My Outback was waiting for me at the parking lot. I set in the CX-5... After the Outback, driving this car would be a punishment. What a difference! I have been driving Outback for a year now. My friend tried it and rushed to the same dealer and bought... the Forester. Since then the cars are best friends - almost like our friends and us. I drive the Forester from time to time. No comparison with the CX-5 either. For the record: I have never thought about buying a Subaru. I've had three Hondas, so my first option was the CR-V. And it was my disappointment: CVT+Turbo=No go. I still don't accept CVTs with the only exception for Subaru.
Interesting, I’ll have to try that comparison… when Subaru decides I’m finally cool enough to get some of their cars to test 🤣
@@jax1079 Hi, I have corrected a misprint. I put "anti-CRV paranoia" by mistake instead of "anti-CVT". Hope you got me right.
Subaru is like a box, they have bad engines also.
Hope you have better luck than most of us. We owned 2 Subarus. 2007 outback & 2003 Forester. Both were unreliable. At 30,000 km the outback was consuming oil. The Forester had fuel line leaks, oil consumption, wheel bearing, clutch problems. Every service was 300 dollars as well. Family members have Mazda CX 5. My nephew's has 320,000 km.changed only spark plugs. My wife had 240,00 before trading. She did not likes the seat. So maybe seat could be an issue but for reliable manufacturer, Mazda are much better than Subaru. The drive of the Mazda is much more enjoyable. Not to mention the CVT problems for Subaru. Just Google on it. In closing, I do hope you have better luck
@@ontarioman6301 Thank you! My Honda CR-V had 325 000 km when I bought a replacement for my lovely Honda. I wanted another CR-V but.... CVT+Turbo=no deal. The Rav4 turned out to be too noisy. The CX-5 had uncomfortable driver's seat.... The Rogue had CVT (the worst of them) and 4* safety rating instead of 5*. A real CR-V is now larger than I need and is called Honda Passport. But I need a compact crossover.
So I bought the Outback. My closest friend has had 4th gen Forester for 6 years with no issues. I am not a Subaru man. Honestly I wouldn't imagine buying a Subaru a few years ago. But the 6th gen Outback is such a striking difference from the previous generation that I decided to take a plunge. No issues so far. #1 car in it's class (compact crossover). How long will it last? We'll see. th-cam.com/video/LpOi-Jj5V8U/w-d-xo.html
Jax, I really enjoyed your evaluation of the CX-5. You clearly showed your knowledge of this cars strengths, weaknesses and where Mazda needs to improve on the tech side to keep pace with the competition. I like everything about the Turbo, but I wish the tech and safety systems were on par with the competition, and that my keep me from purchasing one. Maybe I will wait for next years model to see if they address those areas.
Thank you! I agree: I really like the CX-5 (and Mazda in general), but I’m waiting to see if their next gen tech (and growing relationship with Toyota) helps bring them up to speed. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
I think the 2023 CX-5 Premium and above trims offer Lane Keep Assist
It’s more of a lane bump rather than a steering assist mode. In this class, it needs to have a more active steering assist in my opinion. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
@@jax1079 oh I see.. thank you very much for the clarification. Would you think it’s a deal breaker for sure? Coz I’m about to book one today
@@Av-fn5wx Not at all. The CX-5 is so good overall I wouldn’t let that stop me from buying one. It’s still my favorite small/medium SUV.
@@jax1079 Thank you so ver much. I’m relieved and can complete purchase without any doubts in mind
@@jax1079 Completed the formalities and picked up my CX 5 Sig Turbo yesterday. Loving it. Thank you ☺️
Could you please address the rust problems (underneath) the car/crossover SUV Maza's have. Also, I have read complaints about the giant size key fob with buttons sticking out on the side. I read that owners were unknowingly unlocking trunks and other stuff because of the buttons stick out. Plus, you still have to open with the key. At least this is what I have read. I looked into purchasing a new 2023 Honda CRV-EX-L, but was turned off when I read that they went to the CVT. Plus, a 1.5L engine! I currently own a 2014 Honda CRV-EX-L with a 2.5L engine and a 5-speed automatic transmission. It only has 33,614 miles on it. I know I should probably keep it for the long haul, but I got a hankering for a new one. But that idea is dead since the new CRV's have the 1.5L engine with CVT. They won't last long or be reliable IMHO.
Haven’t heard anything about the rust issue, myself, so I would confirm the source on that. The fob is normal sized but the side buttons can be a minor irritation (at most). I’d probably just keep yours since it’s practically brand new, but I don’t think you have anything to fear from Honda CVTs. They’re not Nissan.
320 lbs or torque when using Premium.
The 310 is when using regular.
And the cluster, if you press info button, the center cluster will change a little. It will display more animations with the radar system. But yea a little too simple and outdated. Still a great little SUV. Enjoying mine!
Very true. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
@@jax1079 Absolutely dated infotainment design. Our 2013 Hyundai i30 CRDI 1.6 Premium is VASTLY nicer.
Even though I’m a RAV4 fan, I got admit the handling of the Mazda is good and the front of the vehicle is very appealing. But as yet no hybrids. I believe Mazda will soon be adopting the Rav4 hybrid power train. Nice vehicle the Mazda.
NZ
That would be really great for Mazda if they could cooperate with Toyota and leverage some of their hybrid tech. That’s the missing piece for their SUVs. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
Mazda released they will be putting the rav4 power train in the cx50 for 2024
This is going to be my next car. I’m tired of all the cars going to CVTs. I hope Mazda never goes that route.
I don't see them going that direction anytime soon. Thanks for watching!
Hey Jax, not sure if I missed this or misremembering, doesn't the turbo do 320 lb-ft of torque with 93 octane? 310 was mentioned in the video.
Also, I love the production on your video. Sound levels, camera switches, all made it really fluid.
Thank you! 🙏🏻 And yes, I was incorrect. I had written down the wrong torque number and didn’t catch it. It’s 320 on premium, which is awesome. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
The refreshed head+tail lights seem like they were updated just for the sake of updating, and don’t actually go with the overall look of the exterior design the way the original ones do. So the 2022 models just look cheap now (in my opinion.) That upcoming cx60 or w/e it’s called looks very interesting to me, can’t wait to see that.
That’s going to be a VERY important model for Mazda. Frankly, it absolutely has to be a hit.
I'd like to know the cargo capacity with rear seats down, whether the seats fold flat (can you sleep in the back), and can the spare tire well hold a full-size spare (not just a compact spare).
I’d imagine both of those would be very tight if not unlikely.
What I don't like about adaptive cruise control is that it is too aggressive in applying the brakes. My nephew has an Audi and it is the same. You will need to replace brake pads and rotors much too soon if you use it a lot, unless there is very little traffic ahead of you. It waits too long to slow up when approaching another vehicle and then has to brake much harder than you would if you just eased up on the gas or gently tapped the brakes.
I agree. The Mazda system is not as well sorted as some of its competitors, which needs to be improved when competing in a more premium segment.
@@jax1079 My nephew's Audi has the same issue, so Mazda is not alone in this regard. What brand has a better sorted adaptive cruise control?
@@robertdevoy3119 All of them will jump on the brakes when someone cuts you off. Hyundai and Kia are solid, especially Genesis. I like Ford’s as well. Acura also seems to get it mostly right. I’m mainly looking at the smoothness of braking in non emergency situations and how quickly and smoothly the vehicle accelerated after slowing down. Just my seat of the pants observations.
@@jax1079 Yes.... the Mazda is good at responding to emergencies, but not so good with normal adaptive cruise control duties. I only use it when traffic is very light. Actually, I love my car and have very few nits to pick. Even the 6 speed tranny is great, especially, with the turbo. But I wonder if the turbo would be necessary with an equally good 8 speed? Perhaps, better gas mileage at the top end and more grunt in the low end and midrange.
I am not able to decide between a used 2020 Honda CRV touring with 28000 miles and 2022 Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Premium Plus with 9000 miles. Mazda being $2000 more than Honda. Any suggestions. This is for my first time teen driver.
Always go cheaper and older for a teen driver. They’ll inevitably ding and scratch it up with their mistakes. No point in getting anything too nice for a new driver. The CR-V is roomier anyway, and just as safe.
How is the ride @ 65mph.... is there a drag in the top gear? No overdrive?
Mazda has been using its trusty 6 gear auto forever, so it’s a known quantity. No issues. It’s pretty darn smooth at highway speeds as well.
@@jax1079 Trying to decide between Subaru Crosstrek or CX5. Subaru now offering lifetime warranty on powertrain....
@@dogsarefun2 That’s certainly compelling, but unless you need the Subie’s more off-road ready awd (although Mazda’s is actually quite good now as well), I think you’ll find the Mazda more satisfying-with a much nicer interior.
@@jax1079 did some research on the "lifetime warranty". See last paragraph... If the Administrator was Subaru it would be a no brainer.
NOT A SERVICE CONTRACT OR INSURANCE - Customer acknowledges that this Lifetime Limited Powertrain Warranty is being provided at NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE and is not a Service Contract and is not insurance.
DETAILS AND COVERAGES OF WARRANTY
Engine: Cylinder block and head and all internal parts, intake manifold, timing gears and gaskets, timing
chain/belt and cover, flywheel, valve covers, oil pan, oil pump, engine mounts, turbocharger housing and
all internal parts, supercharger housing and all internal parts, engine control computer, water pump, fuel
pump, seals and gaskets.
Transmission & Transaxle: Case and all internal parts, torque converter, clutch cover, transmission
mounts, transfer case and all internal parts, engine control computer, seals and gaskets.
Front Wheel Drive System: Final drive housing and all internal parts, axle shafts, drive shaft, constant
velocity joints, front hub and bearings, seals and gaskets.
Rear Wheel Drive System: Axle housing & all internal parts, propeller shaft, u-joints, axle shaft, drive
shaft, bearings, supports, seals and gaskets.
NOT COVERED UNDER WARRANTY: This warranty does not cover damage or failures resulting
directly or indirectly from fire, accidents, theft, abuse, negligence, misuse (racing or overloading), improper
repairs, alteration or tampering, including installation of non-genuine Subaru accessories, lack of proper
maintenance, including use of fluids other than those specified in the Owners Manual, installation of nongenuine
Subaru Parts, airborne chemicals, tree sap, road debris (including stone chips), rail dust, salt, hail,
floods, wind storms, water contamination, lightning and other environmental conditions.
TIRES: Tires are covered by a separate warranty provided by the tire manufacturer.
NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR: Noise, vibration, cosmetic conditions and other deterioration caused by
normal wear and tear.
MAINTENANCE EXPENSE: Normal maintenance services such as engine tune-ups, replacement of
fluid and filters, lubrication, cleaning and polishing, replacement of spark plugs and fuses, replacement of
worn wiper blades, brake pads/linings & clutch linings.
VEHICLE WITH ALTERED ODOMETER: A vehicle on which the odometer has been altered so that
actual mileage cannot be determined.
SALVAGE OR TOTAL LOSS OF VEHICLE: Any vehicle that has ever been issued a salvage title
or similar title under any state law or has ever been declared a total loss or equivalent by a financial
institution or insurer, such as by payment for a claim in lieu of repairs because the cost or repairs exceeded
the cash value of the vehicle.
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES: Incidental or consequential damages associated with a vehicle failure.
Such damages include but are not limited to inconvenience, the cost of transportation, telephone calls and
lodging, the loss of personal or commercial property, and the loss of pay or revenue.
WHERE YOU ARE COVERED: This Lifetime Limited Powertrain Warranty applies to breakdowns
occurring within the continental United States of America, Hawaii and Canada.
DEDUCTIBLE - $100 is the amount you must pay for covered repairs per covered component. If your
cost is a warranty deductible charge imposed by the vehicle manufacturer, this Lifetime Limited Powertrain Warranty will pay for the manufacturers deductible.
ADMINISTRATOR - Warranty Automotive Services Corporation is the administrator of this Lifetime
Limited Powertrain Warranty. This Lifetime Limited Powertrain Warranty is provided by Patriot Subaru
at NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE to the New Subaru Vehicle Purchaser. This Lifetime Limited Powertrain
Warranty is not a Service Contract and is not insurance.
I'm worried about the cylinder deactivation on the cx 5 . Should I be?
Yes and no. It sometimes seems to be an issue with automakers (GM) that needs fixing, and even Mazda has recalled cars for issues with CD. That being said, the tech has no been around for a while, so those issues have been sorted and it should perform more reliably. I wouldn’t necessarily worry about it since the overall reliability ratings and data on most Mazdas is pretty darn good. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Kia and Hyundai look futuristic but they won't age well. Mazda is a timeless design, they've been using the same silhouette since 2014 and still relevant today
Maybe… but none of them will age as well as your screen name.
@@jax1079 i know that's right! Sending ALOHA from Hawai'i
Kia catches fire, no thanks. Cx5 all 5he way baby, ! Looking gooooood!,,,,
Glad you like it! Thanks for watching!
Love my cx5 grand Turing reserve turbo
It’s a great all around vehicle. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
Can make a review compare Ford territory 2023 and Mazda CX-5 2023? which one is best chose ?
Don’t have the Ford Territory here in the states, but it sounds cool! Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Very on point review!! Mazda need to step up on the technology side! Other than that everything is great! The style and the materials!! And of course the handling and driving dynamics is better than other mainstream competitor.
Correct! There are a lot of things to like about the CX-5. Already looking forward to getting behind the wheel of the CX-60. Thanks for watching!
Great video! The Mazda CX-5 is my favorite vehicle period! I have the 22 CX-5 Premium
Love it but I hate the new pizza wheels. What was Mazda thinking? They should have kept the old wheels and also added a digital speedometer. I love the new CX-60. It looks like an extra upscale CX-5. Too bad it'd bit coming to the states!!! 😔😔😔
Thank you! There are some new Mazda vehicles on the way based on the new vehicle architecture, so we should see a very similar updated SUV in the near future. It's going to be a VERY important vehicle for the brand since so much is riding on this new platform. Hopefully, it's a big hit for Mazda. thanks for watching!
The best review out there. Wish you the very best.
Why thank you!
@@jax1079 for the effort and the research.
Excellent video!
Why thank you! 🙏🏻
You definitely have an interesting perspective on this vehicle we both share an affinity for! Looks like you’re in my neck of the woods which was cool to see 😃. You did a great job, I know how much work goes into these videos. Have any videos editing needs? hit me up …
Absolutely! 😉👍🏻 Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Mazda cx5 for 2022 does not have wireless Apple CarPlay. You have to plug your lightning cable to car USB causing wear to your plug on your phone. Ever time you get into your car you have to plug in. So much for the advantage of having wireless charging. You still have to plug in. 2021 had wireless CarPlay but they had problems do they removed it in 2022. Instead of fixing the problem they went backwards and removed. Come on Mazda get with technology. This is disappointing. Please come up with a fix and do an update to the 2022’s so there is wireless CarPlay.
I don’t disagree with the sentiment, but the idea that plugging your phone into the car will wear on it is not really a problem. It’s just an inconvenience, which I get. Mazda needs to update the infotainment for sure. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I have to disagree on the design. It's showing its age now. And really Mazda needs to more styling to be more competitive and while at that at add the touch screen functionality.
I don’t disagree, but I do think it’s impressive that the CX-5 has remained so generally attractive and stylish as long as it has. Mazda’s next phase will be critical to their success, for sure. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
The Kia is over 1 second slower to 60 and doesn't have a larger engine unless you go hybrid. I will admit the tech looks great in the Kia. I just couldn't get past the front end styling.
True, but most people don’t prioritize performance, and I think the styling will always be a matter of taste. I think Kia is taking risks, which I definitely respect.
@@jax1079 Agreed. I had a deposit on a CX-5 and a Sportage. I already own Mazdas and decided that driving dynamics and the upscale interior / exterior styling were more important BUT it was a close call.
@@lesm285 Great for you, the consumer, but if Mazda wishes to be cross shopped with BMW and Mercedes (much less Acura and Lexus), they're going to have to raise their game... and not a parallel move like the CX-50, either. The new platform will be critical to their aspirational success. I hope they make it; I'm a big Mazda fan, myself.
@@jax1079 Totally agree. I am not in the position to buy something like an MDX or XC60 so I feel like Mazdas are the next best thing for now.
Great review. I'm digging your thumbnails. Oh, and leave "little Johnny" alone. He's doing the best he can. 🤣
Haha! Thanks, man! And you would have thought Atlanta United was playing just off camera… 😂
Always the best commentary. We need to root Mazda on as they offer something completely different in driving experience than anyone else. I do love the simplicity of the gauge cluster, as it just has that classic and elegant look that is easy on the eyes day and night. And cool that you mentioned the bottom hinged gas pedal, another cool oddity that also shows up in mini coopers, which now that I think about it is another cool niche company whose models change very slowly. Curious about their Skyactive x and why is has nothing hit the states yet. Without it Mazda will need to get that hybrid system from Toyota.
I kind of want Toyota to swallow Mazda honestly, let them continue work on their RWD lineup, and move Lexus even farther upmarket. There's no reason why Lexus models should have lightly disguised Toyota infotainment systems, even in the newest models. Or... (and this would never happen), flip it and move Mazda WAY upmarket. They're more stylish than Lexus, will probably handle better, and have a bit more freedom for experimentation than what the Lexus brand symbolizes (although I could be wrong because the LC is dope).
@@jax1079 none of those moves help the consumer in any way, shape or form. I take it that you're a Toyota shareholder? Otherwise a very puzzling suggestion to come from a consumer.
@@ShaferHart They’ve already collaborated on several models, and it allows a smaller more interesting company to stay afloat by aligning with a much larger company in need of some sportiness. Then again, with the recent excellence of the GR models, Mazda’s shot might have passed.
There difference is, the Kia is made in Korea, while the Mazda CX-5 is made in Japan.
I mean… I’m not sure that’s a huge difference these days…
Just got one in black. Love it
With gears though. Fab gear box
Nice! Glad to hear it. Hope you continue to enjoy it, and thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I am also 6'6 ... and you have good legroom for a 4 hour trip?
I'll be subscribed after this message
Thank you! And yes, for driver comfort it wouldn’t be a concern but a human will no longer be able to sit behind you 😜
@jax1079 I had a 1978 Datsun 280z 2+2 and thought the same thing ... but somehow my sister managed the back seat behind me lol 😆 😅 😂
Currently I have 2 Avalons and am considering selling the 08.. I'm considering the CX5 or another newer Avalon or ES350.. thanks for your reply!
@@seandavis2520 ES 350h is a great daily
Want to see the 2023 crv sport
Working on it.
Really just a great review. I own a 2020 CX5 reserve and so am very familiar with the strengths and weaknesses of the vehicle. My previous car was a BMW 3 series and I do miss the driving dynamics but the Mazda does come close. Close but not quite there. Upon lease ending I will be looking hard at the new CX70. It will have to elevate driving feel to nearer the BMW for me to pull the trigger. RWD and a 6 cylinder engine will help.
Thank you! Yes, I think the next gen of Mazda vehicles is going to be make or break in terms of their quest for premium. Looking forward to getting behind the wheel of them for sure. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
Not sure why you criticised the transmission. Lots of people don't want a problematic and clunky DCT/CVT. The standard torque converter gear box is actually a plus for these cars.
Not saying you need to go dual clutch, just that the Mazda's ancient six speed is getting outgunned among automatic transmissions in terms of performance and efficiency
No hood struts on the top trim smh
I subtle observation but one that I think Mazda should consider if they want to be taken seriously as a more premium brand. Those details matter. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Maybe if you would get a ticket for tailgating (fine and points off your license) then you would be okay with distance of radar cruise control.
Don't look at you DAMN phone while you're driving.
Lane centering will most likely train people to be lazy and dependent on technology, and they won't keep their hands on the steering wheel.
... and tell those darn kids to stay off my lawn!
Personally i prefer less tech and its why im considering getting one in addition to its high reliability. So much tech will be a big headache later on as car ages. Less is sometimes more. Ty for your review
Not a bad plan. Great point
With premium gas, torque is 320#.
True, in some models such as the CX-9, but I believe the CX-5 maxes at 310 on premium.
@@jax1079 nope, it is 320# on the cx-5 using 93
@@hawaiiguy1 Shoot, you're right. Swapped the 87 and 93 torque numbers. Thanks for the catch!
3:31 This engine has 320 lb-ft of torque when you give it premium gas
Thanks for the great review. I value the CX-5's handsome looks - it's great driving experience and that turbo engine. Enough for me to overlook the lack of technology. Rav4, Tucson, Sportage are just plain ugly compared to the CX-5. I do have the 2022 lower trim with the na engine, I'm trading that in for this and can't wait 😀
Nice! I think you’ll enjoy the upgrade. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
@@jax1079 You pronounced Mazda incorrectly. LOL. Japanese pronounce it Martsz-da. You said maaz·duh. Japanese also say the word twice as fast as you did. But then that's not my problem.
320 torque not 310 , Transmission is made by Mazda and is very different than an average , torque converter /clutch in the middle /transmission... all one piece .
True, but it’s still getting on in years
@@jax1079 Not if you drive it !
I never use cruise control in any vehicle. 🤣🤣🤣
Because you don't drive anywhere, if you drive long distance you will need it
@@winstonphillips1908 I actually take quite a few LD road trips each year. Still don't use cruise control. 🤷🏼♀️
You simply won't get the perfection of a 52K Lexus for the price of 40K. That is the trade off. But I think Mazda found a good niche there which gives you a lot of car for the money. As far at the competition goes, I still don't see a reason to take a chance on a KIA unless you are planning to get rid of it after five years. Reviews like this put no emphasis on owning a car beyond the five year mark. Reliability ratings are much more important to regular car owners, and I am talking about REAL reliability ratings and not the JD Power kind that car manufacturers can purchase.
I don’t disagree, but I would point out that there are WAY more people getting rid of cars between 5-10 years than there used to be, and many people (for better or worse) choose to lease vehicles and rotate them. Look, I’m like you: we currently have an 11 year old Chevy Suburban with 170k miles on it as our main family car. We KEEP vehicles. But lots of people don’t, so longevity is certainly part of the discussion but not the only selling point. (For example, we got my 17 year old a Toyota RAV4 for that very reason, but many of her friends drive Jeeps 😬)
Kia gives you also many expensive rides to your local repair shop.
Is this based on fact or feelings?
@@jax1079 Not first hand, but a friend has a kia optima 2.0 T-GDI... lot of problems over 3 years. At least their warranty is great :)
I’ll take the Mazda drivetrain anytime ! Not so concerned about some extras.
Enjoy it while you can as they shift over to new architecture
The front of the Cx5 looks great.... the back is MEH in terms of design kinda has looked like this for 'many years'... NEGATIVES (👎)Infotainment😑Wheel control is distracting and difficult to use whole moving... a touchscreen setup is much better . Rear Leg Room (👎) my legs are pinned once I sit behind myself and I'm over 6ft. If someone my height sits behind me.. it will be an uncomfortable ride for us both (this applies to the CX9 as well ) The trunk space is too small.Reverse camera (👎) its awful to look at... its like the vehicle needs to be about 4 inches long. This is rental at best..It would be better to buy a Rav4.
Yes and no. The RAV4 is more spacious but currently comes with Toyota’s horribly outdated infotainment system that is no better than the Mazda system, plus the interior is nowhere nearly as nice as the Mazda. The CX-5 is big enough for most people versus its main competitors, but they’re evolving more quickly than the Mazda. That’s where the CX-5 needs to be careful. There will be new versions of all its competitors soon. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻
@@jax1079 Fair point Jax, but what do you think of the 2023, or USA might call it the 2024 infotainment cockpit of the RAV4.they’ll be using the one that the Lexus has. Can you look at the new images and let me know what you think of the future RAV4 cockpit.
Competition is a wonderful thing. The others upped their game and so Mazda must do so also. Too bad Mazda is slow to get it done and is nearly always playing catch up, especially, on the tech front. I have a 2019 Signature and love the quality, the driving pleasure, and upscale feel. However, their nav system stinks and I use Android Auto instead which is way more accurate in getting me to my destination. Hopefully, they will maintain this quality feel with the CX-70, but it sure is a long wait. And I hope they don't force me to buy a combo gas/electric engine when upgrading to the CX-70 or else I'll just keep what I have now.
I am looking forward to the CX-70 as well. I think most brands will be moving towards some form of gas/electric hybrid systems in the future, but perhaps they will do it in the same way Toyota is offering full EVs, plug-in hybrids, hybrid assist, and true hybrids. I like that approach because it keeps an element of choice in the market; however, I'm not sure Mazda has the resources to pull something like that off. Time will tell. Thanks for watching!
He forgot to sit in the back seat, which is where the deal breaker is... too tight....
Addressed it in an earlier review of the CX-5, and yes, it is tight; however, if you’re planning on carrying four full-sized adults in your SUV very often, the CX-5 probably isn’t on your list. The back seat is fine for kids, though. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Your review is close to the mark but I wouldn't call it "Still the best barely" and here is why.....
I would rather a CX 5 over a Sportage or Tucson any day of the year. I owned a Tucson and the dual clutch is horrible at low speeds plus interior switches on the steering wheel and electronic brake kept breaking and were not cheap tog et replaced. Add to that the door entry buttons/solenoids died and had to be replaced 3 times all I can say is never again. Buy a Hyundai or Kia at your own peril, give me a quality Mazda please even with reduced tech, tech is not be all and end all but a quiet, smooth ride in a car that doesn't jerk around at low speeds or whine like a stuffed pig and handles beautifully is the car for me.
I also test drove a sportage and while I did like the screens the rest was pretty average as far as quality of the finish and quietness of the car and ride went. We chose the CX 5 over the Sportage, Seltos, Mitsubish Outlander. We also test drove the Lexus NX and RX for completeness and comparison and honestly if I could afford an NX I would get that without question but to me the CX 5 is almost as good as far as ride and comfort goes.
I see your point for sure, but I’d consider the CR-V and RAV4 to both be bigger players in the segment built on years of long term quality and reliability. The CR-V is the best all arounder (although I haven’t tested the new one yet), and the RAV4 is the best hybrid, general use, and by far most reliable (we own one, full disclosure). I actually really like the Koreans and said the Tucson PHEV was generally better than the RAV4 Prime to live with, but if I was spending my own money… it would be on the Prime. I’d get a CX-5 before just about anything myself, but the RAV4 was for our 17 year old to drive so I wanted something that would last longer than the Earth. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
You made me like it
Nice! Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
The lane assist is just that..an assist. It would be dangerous to be anything else…
year later and mazda has not strenghtened their weaknesses. They say new gen for 2025 model year.
Hopefully. The CX-90 has been well received, but they need a new offering in this space.
Reability off mazda. Is better
Yes
Cx5 is a childs suv, small.
Ok...?
Seats are too hard.
Design is subjective, I find this one bland and the style old and tired.
I mean, it’s been out a while for sure, but I don’t think Mazda’s kodo design language ever looks old and tired. Could just be me, though. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Why do a review on the signature when the majority of buyers cant afford it? Personally I think the premium package has enough bells and whistles. You are way late to the game. There have been numerous reviews on the CX5.
The average new car price in America is over $40k, sooo…. I’m guessing more than half the country can afford this vehicle (or at least they’re willing to get into a five year loan for it).
Test drive them all and decided on CX 5 Premium Plus..Hyundai and Kia look nice but to many issues..Honda and Toyota way overpriced. CX 5 best value for the price. I just don't reccomended the Turbo motor due to some fairly major issues. If its a lot of power you want buy something with 3.0/ 3.6 liter V6
Good decision! With dealers gouging people left and right, Mazdas are increasingly good values
Best out there as you say another 15k to beat the cx-5
True, but the gap is closing. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻