Why Do Disney Remakes Keep Making Money?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
- Get Honey for free at joinhoney.com/n...
Aladdin, Lion King, Dumbo, Beauty and the Beast. We're all sick of them, yet somehow these films continue to pull in the big bucks. What's the secret and why do we keep falling for it?
Why do Disney remakes keep making money? Find out on this episode of the Nostalgia Critic.
The charity for this week is - www.mskcc.org/
Go to our Store for Awesome Stuff - theawesomestor...
Get some Nostalgia Critic T-Shirts here - shrsl.com/?~96c0
See more at our Site: channelawesome.com
Facebook: / channelawesome
Twitter: / channelawesome
Instagram: / channelawesome
Like Doug on Facebook: / 127127037353766
The ONLY Official TH-cam channel for the Nostalgia Critic and Channel Awesome.
New Nostalgia Critic episodes every Wednesday at 5PM CST.
#NostalgiaCritic #Disney
Dolla Dolla Bills Y'all! Who knew interpretive dance could be so beautiful?
The charity for this week is - www.mskcc.org/
NC reviews Beauty and the Beast - th-cam.com/video/d-_s46Uob5E/w-d-xo.html
NC reviews The Lion King - th-cam.com/video/KnyHqxxsD8g/w-d-xo.html
Review Christopher Robin (2018)
CGI Will Smith is creppy okay.
This looks like a horror movie .
Make a review of "The Ant Bully" please!
Review Aladdin (2019)
Please review The Simpsons Movie (2007)
Doug: "Take more risks!!!"
Disney Executives: "But the chart says..."
*YOU ARE EVERYTHING THAT'S WRONG WITH ENTERTAINMENT!*
BlueFox94 BUT THE CHART. SAYS.
When they take risks, they lose money. Safe is safe
@@BLasherman And lazy is lazy.
@@matthewcooper4248 *turns off TV with chart on it*
I think there's one more reason you may have overlooked: animation isn't that respected. Most people just see animated works as a sort of genre aimed at kids instead of a medium.
Its never been respected. When animated movies were nominated for best picture, the academy just made a new animation category, thereby eliminating any animated movie from being nominated for anything other than best animated feature. And most, if not all, mainstream animated movies released in a year are targeted towards kids. And audiences almost always go for Disney or Pixar or Illumination, and never for the more creative but alienating studios like Laika. The few adult animated movies are either based on existing properties, like the Simpsons, or it becomes nothing but sex jokes and swears, Sausage Party, or it's foreign, like Waltz with Bashir. The only places where animation is now starting to get respect are TH-cam and the Annie Awards, the Oscars for animation. Someday, an animated feature will get awards not because it's animated, but despite it. That day is not here, but I think soon.
@@IsaacPrinTheNerd Thankfully, animation is gaining more respect as younger generations who grew up with them mostly treat them with respect and see the medium as is. Also, anime has been growing more outside of Japan and helping animation be seen in a different light. It's just a shame that animators are still screwed in the industry as a whole.
@@IsaacPrinTheNerd Your comment is very much not educated in any way, I strongly and respectfully reccomend you do more research into this subject before you makre yourself look more of a fool than you already have.
I didn't care much about animated movies when I was a kid. I only started to take them seriously as an adult
And that honestly sucks. There's such fantastic storytelling in these films along with the meaningful messages.
Because of people like my dad who hates cartoons and will say anything live action is better for being “real”
Tell your dad I said he can suck it!! Animation is superior!!!
Oh, you have one of those too? My condolences.
Sonic The hedgehog I agree. It’s like Disney live action remakes and any live action remake of a cartoon own his soul. He even prefers the last air bender over the cartoon series because he says it’s more grown up for being live action?!
@@firenze6478 Give this man either an exorcism or an eviction notice. There are no other options.
Lol, has he seen Micheal Bay's transformers?
I never understood the nostalgia draw for these live-action remakes. Why watch an inferior version when you can easily watch the (clearly superior) original version, relive your childhood nostalgic moments as they actually happened, and not shell out $13 to a company insulting your intelligence in the process?
They might want to take their kids to watch those movies and go to MOVIE theater(not Home Netflix).
Plus kids these days have seen today's higher graphics and visual stunting shows so old movies (even if they were good) would feel bland to them.
@@zuhayrroha4392 So Disney would probably make a lot more money (considering there would be no production cost whatsoever, and marketing would be comparably much less) just re-releasing their original films in theatres. It wouldn't be a first. You'd also not get backlash and you wouldn't see them actively spit on their prior films every chance they get in interviews. Also, modern computer graphics have no bearing on high-level hand-drawn animation. They are completely separate styles, just because kids today grew up with computer graphics doesn't make entirely hand-drawn art look comparatively worse. When they mixed hand-drawn with computer graphics, I could see that becoming dated today, but that was pretty much only with Tarzan and a few, long-panning scenery shots in a couple of other films. The Little Mermaid (for example) wouldn't be affected at all, and almost all the other Renaissance films would still look wonderful. Though, I do see your point about families wanting to go to the theatre instead of watch a movie at home. Fair point .
@@zuhayrroha4392 YES!
So few people seem to understand that Disney makes films for children, and the majority of people seeing these films are parents who saw the original sharing the story with their children in a way that a lot of modern children will enjoy.
Personally, I do wish they'd make more original and new stories and that plenty of today's kids can still enjoy the classic versions BUT these remakes serve a purpose and make the business money, so why not share the stories with the next batch of movie fans, and in 20 years they'll be discussing how their version is the best and the new new version sucks!
It's because of the other three elements that the NC talked about. They all complete each other. Nostalgia is the biggest reason but it is still incomplete for many people that's why the other 3 are there to persuade everyone else.
Yeah I always thought if you wanna relive nostalgia just watch the originals over again.
I'm going to say Christopher Robin isn't really a Live action remake. More of a sequel.
same with Mary Poppins returns and Alice in Wonderland(if they only changed the name for this one people would understand as Doug already said in his review of the movie)
That and Christopher Robin is a good movie.
XxHeavensXAnglexX not even that. it's more of another separate story in the Pooh series
If this current wave of Disney nostalgia flicks were approached as Christopher Robin was, we wouldn’t be having the argument
and it is a neat concept, Christopher Robin as an adult revisiting his old friends. Taking the Winnie the Pooh franchise in a new direction.
"I do not like to repeat successes, I like to go on and do other things."
- Walt Disney
Disney today: "Hold my billions of dollars."
It's so sad to see that Disney has now forgotten Walt himself😭
Disney has sold out.
It doesn’t take that long to forget your maker. MCU Twitter staff forgot about Stan Lee before he was even dead
@@harambae117 They didn't just forget him, but they shit all over him
@@lehahiah81 at the risk of sounding stupid, what the hell happened? (I don't watch/follow any Marvel/DC stuff so I'm locked out of the loop here lol)
Parker Brown Good he’s a fraud who stole others work
When the Dumbo remake was still in theaters, I went to see another movie instead. After it was over I was in the bathroom when a heard a little girl a few stalls over tell her mom "I liked the other one better". That gave me faith in humanity again. Whenever I get frustrated at these shit remakes, I just remember that pure soul.
I also told the mom while still in my stall "your kid has great taste".
👏😌
Well while your at it, how about remembering this phrase "OPINIONS EXIST" buuut... then again your a youtube commenter so I guess this verbal rape of others opinions and what counts as humanity are normal for you.
There’s hope and chance for the future.
I felt the same way when my 12 year old nephew liked the original Star Wars better than ep 1-3.
@@genghiskengmail so if he liked the ladder you would have slapped him, abused him, manipulated him into believing the opposite opinion is the only correct opinion like everybody else on the internet cause its turned into a civil war battleground
Disney Reboots: We are...Inevitable
Disney classics: And we..are..Legacy(snap
Public Domain: We belong...... to everyone.
Executives: We are the Thanos Snap
Reason they make money, people like familiar instead of original
so true, when Disney makes an original live action movie it fails, like Tomorrowland or A Wrinkle in Time , at least the remakes get people talking about how much they like or not like them so people go and see the movie. There is more speculation about how they will tackle something that already exist rather than something new.
Even when the familiar was better in every way and you could just rewatch that
@@patax144 A Wrinkle in Time is a remake though, and isnt Tomorrowland just a movie based on a defunct attraction so it was just another attempt to pull a Pirates of the Caribbean
Like "comic" fans getting mad at tom holland and praising tobey for being "comic accurate"
FromBeyondTheGrave1 tomorrowland is actually a themed land in the magic kingdom at Disneyland and Disney world
"what inspired you to make live action remakes right next to the original classics?"
Disney: "Money!"
Because mi original live action movies failed
No shit Sherlock every corporations job is to make money why the fuck would they make movies that don’t make money
“We’ve got to have money!”
Sharan Arora Of course money is a reason to make a movie, but it shouldn’t be the only reason
Heaven forbid a business make money
It seems like there's only four types of movies being released these days: Disney remakes, superhero films, movies about dogs, and a new animated yeti movie annually. A little more variation really would be nice!
Heather LaPlant an animated movie about bats or another undersea movie by Disney (we have the critically acclaimed Nemo series from Pixar, Atlantis, and the Little Mermaid series), a story taking place in Outer Space, a story taking place at a zoo or a museum or a botanical garden or the swimming pool or the park. All could be animated as well. Heck I dare say that they *should* be animated.
@Heather LaPlant ya i guess that's why now Disney/Marvel and their major rival WB/DC been tryin anti-hero/supervillain movies recently...a somewhat fresh spin on comic book movies 😌
Especially a new Muppet movie
Does anyone notice that all of these genres would appeal to the Chinese demographic?
@Dylan Sharp *four types of Blockbusters
Ya happy?
9:36 he’s wearing a green screen. Let us create works of art brethren.
Shadilay Kekistan!
lets see
Should've used it to turn himself into a honey-obsessed Winnie the Poo.
* Puts a s hit ton of Pink Man dancing on Doug *
Maybe edit out the gratuitous crotch shots. Can't.... unsee 🙈
Reporter: Hello Disney!
Disney: I like money!
Reporter: Why do you make live action movies?
Disney: *MONEY*
Edit: Thank you all for the likes and replies! I will be subbing to all of you.
Every corporation/corrupt corporate executive in a _freaking_ nutshell.
😂
because no one watches when I dont make remakes
Mr. Crazypants I can’t help but read the Disney voice as Mister Krabs.
Great reference
Disney employee: so I have this cool new movie idea
Disney executive: how about we just make another lion king all hail money
More like- Disney executive: You are FIRED!!!!!!!!!
It'll be super easy, barely an inconvenience!
@@ianspencer5327 references are tight.
Remember that time someone from had a creative idea for an animated movie, but CG movies were more popular (and thus, safer) so the studio sabotaged it so they would have an excuse to stop financing animated movies?
I'm talking about Treasure Planet. That movie deserved better
all hail money 😂
A lot of people forget that Disney used to re-release their classic animated films in theaters every so often, which was a big moneymaker and kept all their properties relevant until home video basically killed it. I think these live action remakes are trying to serve that purpose. What Disney could probably do is to theatrically re-release the animated movies, but add in some never before seen deleted footage or new footage like the Star Wars special editions to give people who have already seen these films multiple times an excuse to see them again in the cinema. People would eat this up and there'd be no controversy so long as Disney doesn't pull a George Lucas and make the original versions unavailable.
They did tho, both original Beauty and the Beast and Lion King were re-released in 3D, but didnt make nearly as much money as remakes
@Reality still that wouldn't make a billion, so they prefer to remake since everyone goes to see that
Otaku Bullfrog I remember they used to do that on special occasions. Example: Fandango rereleased old movies or even marathon Classic Doctor Who episodes due to an anniversary. Nowadays they don’t and I can see why. I mean I get it, I would rather just rewatch the movie I have at home but responses like this are probably why they do remakes. To make people feel like they’re seeing something new.
Oh wow. I hope Disney never pulls the originals. Oh people would be outraged. Pulling also won't work at all. It won't work in this day and age with all the technology especially the internet. It is ridiculously easy to bootleg and pirate movies these days. People will do it, if they are desperate enough. To some extent, I can see where they are coming from. If someone has no way to legally obtain a piece of media in their location, it seems reasonable for them to turn to more shady methods. It should be the media company's fault that they loose out on sales due to poor availability. They should invest in better distribution. The best way around that is for the media company is to provide more legal methods of obtaining their products. Even if there are remakes, the original films should be made available. This is what Disney is doing with the Disney Plus streaming service. Once someone subscribes to Disney Plus, they have access to all of the Disney movies both originals and remakes. That is good. That is a legitimite way to give out the content. However I do think it is unfair that Disney movies can't be viewed on other streaming services like Netflix. To me it seems like capatalism going too far and the government should break streaming services down with anti trust laws. This situations reminds me of World of Warcraft. It is an online game made by Blizzard. This game occasionally gets updated with expansions. There is new content and tweaks to the game play. Unfortunately some people don't like new expansions. There are people desperate enough to play older versions on their own private computer servers and give no financial support to Blizzard. Blizzard doesn't like this. It shut down one site with private servers and an older version. Later it released World of Warcraft Classic. It is an alternative version of World of Warcraft that has no expansions. This version is called Vanilla by the fandom. The classic version runs alongside the updated version. I think releasing World of Warcraft Classic was a good idea. It gives people what they want in a legal and legitimate manner. That way people won't have to resort to shady methods so desperately. Vanilla World of Warcraft is like the origional Disney movies. Just because they are old, it does not mean they are bad or they are not worth attention. Both are great at nostalgia. So these are worth preserving for the future.
How many Disney live action remakes movies.
Why make a 24 minute video when you can say the most short and correct answer : "The public is stupid"
"A person is smart, people are dumb." - Agent K, MIB
TL;DR
Because there's bigger and revenue on longer videos
Wow... "The public is stupid". If intelligence had mass, the amount you used for this statement would fit on the head of a needle.
@@GuardianGrarl Ask Doug Walker, or any other 'critics' out there. Part of the job's identity is being a 'superior, intelligent species' who can judge, lecture, and silence the 'ignorant worms' out there.
"If it's a remake of a classic, rent the classic!" - The Critic
It's like a broadway stage show, you go to see it done differently but the same
im curious what a live action cars will look like lol
Miranda Barden I mean considering how expensive it is to see a broadway show versus a movie, I would damn well hope you did
Doug talked about his 2019 Lion King audience crowd seeming brainwashed in his theater and I swear I got the same thing with mine. Like, during the movie, people were on their cellphones, taking bathroom breaks, constantly moving in and out of the cinema in passing interest, but as soon as those credits rolled there was this uproarious applause! And a lady was like, "That was... good!" almost like an automated response instead of a genuine one.
Same with mine, without the applause
Popcorn zombies.
That's some sci-fi crap right there... So unsettling
good glad that people still appreciate disney for their glory days
Are you sure we are not in a very long black mirror episode?
Nostalgia Critic drinking game: take a shot every time Doug says "don't get me wrong" during one of these analysis videos.
@Dom Doodle now this feels like a personal challenge......
That would kill so many people
I'd be a goner. Oh wait, I'm only 18, can't drink yet. DAMN IT!
@@alyssajones4368 Come to Puerto Rico 🇵🇷. You can drink alcohol at 18
@@jmsg_PR No fucking way! You serious dude?
Disney: hello I like money
Fans: so why do you keep remaking the same crap except there live action
Disney : MONEY
Same story, same scenes, same characters but difference os execution is crap.
You mean Mr. Krabs is in charge of Disney now? That makes way too much sense...
@@flamescion To think crabs rules Disney... one day it'll come full circle and we'll just have them dancing on money piles.
Gary: Meow
Me: Gary! Disney is not greedy and they would never make quick cash grabs off our nostalgia
"Remakes of Cinderella, The Jungle Book, and Beauty and The Beast"
Me: They're just trying to stay afloat so they can focus on new ideas.
"Remakes of Dumbo, Aladdin, and The Lion King"
Me: I'm sure they're close to releasing a movie not based on past movies.
"Sees upcoming remakes of Mulan, The Little Mermaid, and The Hunchback of Notre Dame"
Gary: Meow Meow Meow
Me: I KNOW THEY'RE STILL MAKING CRAPPY REMAKES! DON'T RUB IT IN!!!!
I still think that Maleficent was the wrong villain to give the _Wicked_ treatment. I would have gone with Hades.
Plus, I'm pretty sure James Woods would come in and play him again if asked.
I would've gone with Scar.
That would have been a lot more fun and fitting. Maleficent was never supposed to be a sympathetic villain, she was pure evil and making her sympathetic really watered down her character. Hades, on the other hand, can be played much better and more convincingly as a sympathetic villain - he's just doing an unsavory job that no one else wants to do but everyone else hates him for it. If they leaned into that aspect of his character, it could have made a much better movie because he'd have a much stronger motivation, especially if we see him struggling with trying to be accepted and liked, only to be crapped on by his peers just because of his role in the Pantheon.
I don't see what kind of story you can tell with Hades.
@ Dargonhuman And they could have kept his fast-talking personality and playing it off as "masking pain beneath the veneer or humor" like Deadpool in the Deadpool movies.
Can we get the ghost of Walt Disney to appear from the clouds telling the company to remember?
Like they care.
Or have the scene from the GOOD lion king were simbas father is a cloud but it’s Walt disney
Ethan Rossignol That’s what he is referencing
The board would vote him out
Walt: Remember.... who you are....
Disney Studios: Remake the Lion King? Thanks Mr. Disney
Nostalgia critic: I don't know what's next for Disney. Me: A hand drawn/3D remake of Pirates of the Caribbean. (22:58)
@marianne mccrank well when they made something original for once people didn't support it.
Treasure Planet was awesome.. Too bad it bombed
You know what, this is modern Disney in a nutshell:
HOW BAAAAD CAN I BE!!! IM JUST GRABBING ALL THE CASH THERE CAN BE!!!!
Whats even more ironic is illumination is milking their Banana Tic-Tacks in the same way that Disney is milking live action films
Fifth reason: New kids haven't watched the animated versions. They watch the live-action version and then go buy the original. They effectively sell two movies for the price of one.
Sixth reason: New movies put Disney and their brand back in the public eye increasing the number of people who see them and think about their products which in turn makes them more likely to buy their products.
Seven reason: To extend their ownership behind old copyrights. By making this easy to make remakes they extend their ownership behind those franchises for some more years.
I actually think your sixth reason is the most important. Disney always slums it for while after their golden periods, and 2019 marks the end of a sort of golden period for Disney with the Marvel films, Star War Films and the last generation of Pixar films all coming to an end this year.
Disney is probably already planning for their next big decade in the second half of 2020s, but they need time and money to set that up, so they will rush out easy money making shlock, such as these live-action remakes to build up some easy capital and keep the Disney brand in the public eye.
One of the reasons Disney has remained one of the world's most successful and influential media corporations for over 8 decades is because they ensure even in their slumps, they are making money, and are not out of the public eye nor giving their competitors any chances to move into their space.
Eighth reason: Similar to reason number three, some adults mistakingly think animated films equal little kid films, so these films give them an excuse to like a story from an animated film without making them fell like children in the immature sense.
Come to think of it. I've seen a ton of Lion King merchandise in stores recently. Not with the designs from the remake, but the designs from the original. These remakes are making people conscious of those original movies again, and likely making Disney a whole lotta money by making nostalgic properties more relevant than they have been since the original movie.
@@harrisonkrauss6584 I can't stand people who think that just because something is animated it's made for kids, like the people at the Academy Awards who nominate the best animated film even though some of them haven't even seen the films they nominate.
*sees "Lilo and Stitch" in the upcoming live action remakes*
God dammit Disney...
Joshua Seagondollar The only one I’m sort of interested in seeing is the Hunchback of Norte Dame.
@@M0b1us_118 Why? It's allready perfect. You know they'll butcher that one too
@@M0b1us_118 hopefully they change it up. Especially with the gargoyles ._.
philip lagerwall True, very true, the only things I care about are the casting choices and the Hell Fire scene (which I know, it won’t be as good as the original.)
@@M0b1us_118 Aww, dangit. Now you made me curious too. This is why the keep making those remakes.
Moana came out 2016 and after that only Wreck-It Ralph 2 has been released, if you only count 3D animated non-Pixar.
Two movies, two and a half years.
Meanwhile... The Jungle Book, Alice Through the Looking Glass, Beauty and the Beast, Dumbo, Aladdin and The Lion King released.
Pixar cancelled Newt and Disney cancelled Gigantic.
Giantic is not cancelled moron
@@kellyedwards6429 Unfortunately, it is. Get yo facts straight. I wish it weren't true myself, but that's life for ya.
ANYWAY, yeah this pisses me off so much. We literally haven't had an original animated film from Disney SINCE Moana in 2016. Three years ago! Ralph 2 sucked balls, and this year we're getting Frozen II, which looks pretty promising so far but I ain't holding my breath. After Frozen II, Disney has not even revealed what their next animated project will be. It could very well be a freakin Zootopia sequel. So we have NO info about Disney's new animated projects, but they'll announce casting for the live action remakes out the wazoo. It's such bullshit. Luckily, Pixar has two original films coming next year. At least they know what they're doing and finally stopped having a sequel-fest. Wish I could say the same for regular Disney.
Renee I believe that the next original film Disney is doing is Raya and the Last Dragon, which they announced back at D23. 😁
@@Lauren_210
And we got three original films over last year and this one, but I think it might be too late, as right-wing youtube is still Hyucking it up.
I sometimes forget that the original fairy tales of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and Cinderella exist because Disney made them so unique and recognisable.
Because the average movie goer is blinded by nostalgia and wants to see their favorite characters again, but they soon realize that the movie sucks, but they keep watching them again and again because they think the next one will be good, but it never is.
hindu_frappe *ding ding ding* You took it right out of my mouth!
hindu_frappe or people enjoy them.
Actually, the audience score on rotten tomatoes is good, it’s nearly 90%
Actually there are a few live action sequels/reboots that were okay in my opinion
hindu_frappe pretty much with the transformers movies just like bay said no matter what you’ll still go see them.
"So Doug, what would you do if TH-cam crashed hard?"
"... *COMMERCIALS!!* "
@I Like Free Speech It's surprisingly easy, too. Ever since I linked my accounts, now all of my videos just automatically get copied over there when they publish without me having to lift a finger.
Surprised this hasn't been deleted yet...
1. I, too, thought the Ghostbusters cartoon came first as a child because it was all I knew. Same with Beetlejuice.
2. Tim Burton's Alice is a SEQUEL, not a remake.
For me, there was "Beetlejuice", "Back to the Future", "Dumb and Dumber", and possibly other cartoons that I didn't know were based on movies at the time...
1. The Beetlejuice cartoon is an insult to the movie. They shouldn't exist in the same universe.
2. Sequel or remake it's crap, and its only purpose is to reclaim the copyright on the Alice in Wonderland story. Same with the remakes.
@powerstar 2028 I've only seen the movie but I'm guessing that it's definitely better.
Jade Jaws Alice in Wonderland is not crap
Elizabeth Why would a sequel of Alice in Wonderland be called Alice in Wonderland? Also Wonderland in the new version is actually Underland.
Aladdin and the King of the Forty Thieves was a badass sequel, if only Mozenrath (arguably the best villain in Aladdin) was in it, instead that claw guy.
Mozenrath was originally going to be revealed as Aladdin’s brother in King of Thieves, but the idea was scrapped. There was possibility for an Aladdin 4, with Mozenrath as the villain...but Johnathan Brandis the voice actor for Mozenrath died before any work had been done on the story. So no Aladdin 4 after all.
The cat is the best Alladin villain
🤔While I like that Aladdin did find his dad, I always wondered how the story would have gone if Aladdin and Mozenrath found out they were brothers. Mozenrath was personality my favorite villain in the Aladdin TV series. It's such a shame we never will due to what happened to Johnathan Brandis. May he rest in peace 😔
Critic was using that honey ad to try audition for the next riddler. You don't fool me. YOU DONT FOOL ME!
Lmao 😂
First thing that came to mind seeing all that green.
Am I the only one who thinks they could add this scene in Clockwork Orange and nobody would ask any questions about it?
I was very unsettled by the hhhhoney ad.
lol
Nostalgia. Money. Popularity. Laziness.
These are the ingredients used to make the (semi) perfect remakes.
But the Nostalgia Critic added a special ingredient to the concoction:
Facts and Honey.
How you can be semi-perfect? You're either perfect or you're not Cell.
Dalek Renegade Hah! I get it
Glad Araki doesn't doesn't do that, but instead improves upon his earlier work, making a master after the other.
1994 Jungle Book is still my favorite of the Disney Live Action movie remakes. It was more original, entertaining, and has it's own identity and beauty to it
I like both remakes. The 2016 was actually more faithful to the book as well at some points (the Buffalo scene was a nod to Shere Khan’s death in the original book, and the Bander-log were outcasts among the animals like in the book as was the scene with Mowgli and the Red Flower)
Mine’s 101 dalmatians
It's not just Disney, why do some remakes from ANY studio either end up successful or get made at all?
I understand it's mostly for money's sake. But the original versions of most iconic movies are...for lack of a better word, sacred to people. Aladdin, Dumbo, Lion King, Robin Hood, King Arthur; all these movies TRY to recapture the same glory of the originals. But instead, they end up messing things up for the sake of audiences who care more about explosions and PC awareness in movies.
I don't want to watch a movie about an idiotic Robin Hood who travels with a black Little John who doesn't even match his namesake. I want to see a film depicting a swash-buckling, cunning and playful Robin, a Little John who's as big as an ox with a beard as blond as a summer cornfield, a devout Friar Tuck who would happily lop your head off with his sword, if you touch his mutton and a Maid Marian who's as sweet as she is beautiful.
I don't want to watch a version of Aladdin where the Sultan is a stone-faced leader. I loved him better when he was a child at heart.
I don't want to see roided out Ninja Turtles fighting Shredder in a mech suit. I want to see the turtles actually LOOK like ninjas; sleek, agile and above all, skilled martial artists.
But nope...the movie industry thinks kids are too dumb for that stuff. So, they gotta adapt the movies based on what's "hip" and "trendy."
All I know is...if they do this kind of thing with The Breakfast Club or The Princess Bride, HEADS WILL ROLL
Molly Ringwald is basically a literal Hypocrisy spewer.
At one point, she says "The breakfast club doesn't need a remake. It is good as it is. If they do one, they would change a few characters with black or another gender. We don't need that."
Later, she stars in Jem and the holograms remake, which was horryfying. She said in an interview that it is empowering. No it is not. It's idiotic and manipulative to fans.
She is basically a fu**ing hypocritical character in real life.
“If everyone buys one ticket, they make a profit”
That’s the thing. Enough people are curious enough to watch it at least once. Add in kids who want to see it (or nostalgic parents dragging their kids to something “safe”) and that’s why it keeps working.
Children are always at least 1 ticket more because they have to take their parents with them
One thing is that people who dislike the whole trope STILL watch it in the cinema. They are curious about them and want to bring out their opinions ASAP. ESPECIALLY if they are are an influencer.
Orange Icecream Pancakes after seeing the Aladdin reviews I wasn’t gonna go but my friend chose the movie on a whim, tbh I wasn’t disappointed. I actually had fun. What I’m saying is people are going because you never know the one you actually end up liking. Obviously I wasn’t the only one who felt that way considering the audience score.
Well jokes on them I haven't seen any of the remakes, since Beauty and the Beast. And you can be damn sure that my future children are not gonna grow up with them.
PikaLink91 You should get more likes.
When are we getting the live action remake of nostalgia critic? With Dwayne Johnson playing Doug? 🤔
2025 was the last date I heard, unless they push it back again like they have with the last three announced release dates.
2025, but I heard that it was gonna only be 2023, damn these delays.
Paul Giamatti as Doug
Let's get Danny Devito to play Malcolm
But we have to keep Bill as Bill. No one can be nearly as wise, kind and knowledgeable as Bill except for Bill himself.
"Why are we given the same thing over and over again?"
Short answer: money
Long answer: fast and easy money
We 've got to have Money!
Longer answer: opinions exist and as human beings with sences of morality and equality(minus you of course) should have respect for these opinions.
Long Answer: MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONEEEEEEEEEEEEYYYYYYYYYYY!
*with only 3 circles*, I dominate the planet
Clearly there's nobody best me
I'm owning this battle
In fact, I own this whole series!
Eyyye ERB refrence.
I'm happy ERB went independent.
SO HOP ON MY STEAMBOAT, BOYS! BUT DON'T ROCK IT!
I’ll put a smile on your face and green in your pockets
@@MM-xn6tnI’ll put a smile on your face
Let's face it; nostalgia's becoming a growing cliche. Hope Disney stops with these remake, but we all know that'll be highly unlikely.
So long as they keep making money, they will keep making them.
Nostalgia is a disease and critic is the doctor
we need to make them do it: every now and then Disney does release a non remake movie but people always ignore those and they fail miserably, the moment one of these non remake movies actually gets some recognition and money Disney will stop making remakes . If you want for Disney to stop making remakes go see Jungle Cruise and Artemis Fowl next year instead of Mulan.
They won't stop unless a couple of the movies released in a row are financial flops 😩
@@patax144 even though it sounds like they are making changes to their Mulan story to better fit Chinese culture, and everyone's throwing a fit about that (don't ever read the original legend then, there was no Mushu in that either).
@ChannelAwesome I think the quote from Pixar's Ratatouille has what you are trying to state but the trouble it has:
"But there are times when a critic truly risks something, and that is in the discovery and defense of the new. The world is often unkind to new talent, new creations. The new needs friends."
Think it's because of the new things people try, the negative response is more certain.
Great quote!
@Neil Brown Ratatouille was beautiful, thanks.
Another reason why Ratatouille is amazing
I love that quote it’s my favourite part of the movie the new needs friends like the new animated movis made entirely by a privet group of animators “hazbin hotel” you gotta check it out it’s incredible.
The world needs to give the new friends
I think I can chalk it all up to Field of Dreams:
"If you build it, they will come."
I would kill to see Disney tackle the Twelve Dancing Princesses, The Goose Girl, Wild Swans or Valissa the Beautiful.
Barbie did a 12 dancing princesses movie. As a kid I really enjoyed it. Disney could do that. Disney princesses is a big money making franchise. Frozen has two princesses, and that is another big franchise. Both are financially lucrative, and they have huge fan bases. Personally I am a big fan. Imagine what it would be like if Disney made an awesome movie with twelve princesses. People would go nuts. It has the potential to be big. Speaking of Barbie, she does have a Rupunzel movie. It had a creative spin of making the Rupunzel character into a painter. This is an old movie. Tangled came out later. It also depits Rupunzel as a painter. I wonder if Disney got the idea from the Barbie movie.
i really wonder what goes through his head to come up with his sponsored ads-
like im really surprised he didn't pour honey over himself
And there's the idea for the next Honey ad! :D
Hey, look at it this way.
At least they aren't boring. XD
I'm more interested in all the callbacks and inside jokes hidden in them
Dont give him ideas
@@plattytheperrypus5701 No... DO give him ideas! I love watching his "ads" almost as much as what his video is about lol
Someone posted a video recently called "Animation is Underapprcieted" That video was in reaction of the Lion King (2019).
I feel like we are in this dark age of entertainment, where people just want everything as realistic as possible or just make movies and video games have graphics that look so real.
Video games is one thing, but I feel this with Disney and their movies that they want to show that these live action movies makes things feel more immersive, when it simply not true, even 2D animation can make you feel immersive in that setting.
You can say that the Lion King (1994) had the least magic out of the Disney movies during that time, but I think the reason why The Lion King was such a gold mine for Disney is because they made a movie with No humans in the vicinity, and they were able to give these animals these quirky personalities and flaws. They manage to make these animals feel relatable, and I think thats the magic of The Lion King. So really this idea of "what would be like in real life" is essentially stripping away that Magic and left with just nothing to really stand on and except boost the appeal of the original
yeah forget Disney still makes good animated movies and original ones even more original than the ones they are remaking , if people supported the kind of Disney they want to see the animated movies the non remake live action movies perhaps Disney will stop making remakes and start making good live actions with the help of fox the same way they started making good animated movies again with the help of pixar
This is literally what I say about Disney all the time
I think that Doug made a good point in his reviews of the Aladdin and Lion King remakes. If they made Aladdin into a crazy ass Bollywood style musical and made The Lion King in the style of a nature documentary where none of the animals talk those films probably could've differentiated themselves enough from the originals to at least make the end product more interesting.
Fans: "Take some risks"
Executives: "I'll have 2 shots of espresso this morning instead of 1!"
" you monster "
"Are you _mad_ !?!?"
Or you could say:
Fans: "Take some risks"
Executive: "Here is exactly the movie you watched as a kid, wearing a different skin"
Also fans: "OMG! So cute! Here, take a small mountain of money!"
@@SKyrim190 fans: "it's not the skin we wanted"
*cocaine
That was the most horrifying Honey ad I've ever seen...
Sees Lilo&Stitch in the line up
Vader: *NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO*
Live-action Lilo and stitch is going to be a freaking nightmare..
Of course these live action ones will fade. No depth to them. The animated features had style, substance, depth, range, magic, and connection.
Amen! The Lion King (2019) I found it forgettable
I don’t think the live-action remake of The Jungle Book is going to fade into obscurity considering the critical acclaim that film got from critics and the amount of money it made.
All these remakes christ Walt Disney is rolling in his own grave at this point
@@vantagepoint9270 yes
As the Critic said "if you want to see the remake of the classic, rent the classic!"
And, of course, "IF THE MOVIE STINKS, JUST DON'T GO!"
@Adrijana Radosevic someone hasn't watched _The Critic..._
@Adrijana Radosevic The cost of a movie ticket is just too expensive for me (unless it is a second-run showing; but not all movies get a second-run showing at cheaper movie theatres, so...)!
Instead of remaking the originals they should remake the sequels. Fix the mistakes they made and yet it’s still a live action remake of the movie.
But that’s effort
@@TheDCbiz that is unfortunately the motto of many big name companies: make as much money as possible with as little effort as possible
Jungle books getting a squeal
It's funny how Disney STILL acts like it's struggling to stay afloat
After seeing the live action Aladdin this past tuesday, That was the first thought that crossed my mind. A live action "Return of Jafar" would be amazing and it could still be done even with the way the movie ended.
I can't believe this video is nearly 4 years old and practically nothing has changed.
Because the originals weren't nostalgic when they came out.
"Remember kids it doesnt matter if it'' good, only if it makes money."
-Mark Hamill.
Disney could have just as easily rereleased the original animated classics in cinemas, with HD updates and better sound, and they would have made a shit-ton of money. Minimal effort, big returns.
Also, you are getting way too good with these paid advertisements. Someone needs to hire you to do an actual commercial for their products.
I'm pretty sure they did that with the Lion King. Or like it was Lion King in 3D or something when 3D was really big.
This was already done for decades, up to the IMAX and 3D reissues of Beauty and the Beast and The Lion King. The remakes make far more money, even when they're not good.
@@GarudaMan9 True, but I definitely would go see the original Cinderella, Dumbo, Sleeping Beauty, Bambi, The Little Mermaid, etc. if they got released in theaters again. I wish they would :(
@@akajulester Heck they could probably do that with the original Star Wars... (And if they really want to double dip with the remakes why not have both the remake and the original in the theater at the same time? (I mean not the exact same time but staggered so after walking out of the remake you could go and watch the original...)
@@britipinojeff True. I saw the 2D animated classic 'Loin King' re-released in theaters not too long ago. It was so spectacular on a massive screen with the surround sound. Damn.. I miss Disney's 2D films
Video Title
Me: Because people are too dumb enough to stop putting money into soulless remakes.
"We've GOT to have.... HONEYYYY."
shame i might be the only guy who thought of that xD
Disney: We’ve GOT to have........MONEYYYYY!
Soon they will do claymation remakes of live action movies and balance will be restored
underrated comment lol
The Addams Family is the first one.
Great theory, I have a better one:
Hollywood is creatively bankrupt. This isn't a trend isolated within Disney.
Such an overly-broad brainlet statement.
Why is that though? How could they not have any new, fresh ideas? I mean I myself have ideas that I would like to somehow get out there... How is it I have all of these ideas swimming around in my head when none of these professional movie makers do?
@@TheVanishing87 Simple, the executives don't want to take risks; the companies want quick and easy money.
@@TheVanishing87 A lot of people have ideas, few people have good ideas, and even fewer can make something worthwhile out of their good ideas. You can have a simple premise for a movie, but to get a quality script out of that is something else entirely. And maybe your ideas aren't as great as you think
Leo B I assure you my ideas are at least more creative than these boring Disney remakes. I’m confident someone somewhere would like my ideas. I already started working on one of them.
Come on, Disney, I'm not asking much. Just make more original content. The fans will love you more.
@marianne mccrank Tired of them too! I want new things. Please Disney, give us something new and totally original for a change! Also please, please for the love of everything decent in this world don't remake Lilo & Stitch. Stitch will look horrible in live-action and he's supposed to be cute and fluffy! Besides, that movie's perfect the way it is. No need to fix. Everything about that movie is great!
Disney: Hello, I like money.
Me: What inspired you to do live-action remakes of your most popular animated films?
Disney: Money.
and also they can renovate the copyright on stuff that should be copyright free since it's super old like Dumbo
@@Jakioliberty I didn't even think of that. Papa Walt's not letting a single IP of theirs slip by them.
Half the reason I watch Nostalgia Critic is for the mid roll ads
Honestly I really like Christopher Robin
I like the Aladdin remake and the lion king
It was too inconsistent to me.
Most sponsor ads I skip, but there are a few TH-camrs who do a great job with them that make me want to watch, just to see how weird they can make the ads. Nostalgia Critic, Cinemassacre and Ryan George have been killing it with their sponsor ads lately.
@@Dargonhuman Defunctland did a pretty good job with the sponsor shoutouts for his Jim Henson series.
Every time I see any of these unwanted live action remakes, all I can think is, "Gigantic was cancelled for this garbage."
In the same way Popeye was cancelled for The Emojji Movie.
Why do you think that, Gigantic was shelved for creative issues. Disney has two slots for animated movies per year. The live-action slots are a whole different studio. Do some research into Gigantic.
I don't think so, most of the people working on the live action stuff aren't working on the animated stuff, it was most likely cancelled because it wasn't working.
In the Alice and wonderland remake, the queen of hearts looks like pennywise mixed with queen Elizabeth the first
Good description of that character
Seriously, this should be a time where the real creative animation studios (Laika, Cartoon Saloon, Wes Anderson, Aardman) shine.
Holy shit, son - I see "Laika", I think "bringin' the big guns, huh?" XD
I like how Wes Anderson is now strongly associated with animation when he only made like two animated films out of his entire filmography...at least, that recognition is justified with how much uniqueness and artistry he brought onto the table exploring the medium.
The great day of AVGN and Nostalgia Critic uploading on the same day has graced us again!
Thanks for the warning. i never get any warning when avgn upload for some reason.
@@robertharris6092 You're not subscribed to him?
@@TheListenerCanon ya
Genuinely never skip past your adds because they are legit entertainment 👌
8:33. Let it be known, that PIXAR THEMSELVES didn't like this, and many staff members, of various ranks, left in annoyance.
The Smart-Casual Gamer. Well good thing they announced after Toy Story 4 they had no plans for any more sequels
We getting a shit ton of Pixar originals
If they're remaking Mulan, we'll just harass them with the Schezuan Sauce all over again. That'll show 'em.
The Mulan trailer actually looks like something that might be new and fresh. Plus,there's not going to be any singing or Mushu so it might be a solid film that has fresh take on the story. It's the only one that I'll pay money to see.
@@fruitbythefoote hell I wouldn't mind if they made it more like a martial arts movie like Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon or Hero
Problem is do I blame Disney or do I blame the people that are paying to go see theses movies?
I guess I'll say both.
Though to be honest , if Disney continues making remakes, they should remake their least popular films. The Black Cauldron could be a interesting remake because the original was hated so they can make a lot of changes and improvements to the film.
I mostly blame the audience! If people would stop watching them, disney would stop making them. I cannot really blame disney. It makes a lot of money, why should they stop?
As Doug said with ‘Pete’s Dragon’, it’s not as widely recognised of a brand as something like ‘Beauty and the Beast’ or ‘The Lion King’ are. If they remade ‘The Black Cauldron’, not many people would recognise it.
@@stormtraitor6545 True. Yet, they could play another game and market it as a "new movie". They wouldn't fool older audiences but young ones might actually love a dark fantasy movie that would definitely make them feel "grown up". And the Black Cauldron's universe is clearly franchise material.
I agree. I wish they'd remake movies that deserved another shot at the big screen and actually translates well to a live action movie. Might I add Atlantis and Treasure Planet to that list?
@@Revan-eb1wb Yeah, but seriously, people are too stupid.. It's really sad that the majority are dumb enough to think "it was a good movie the first time, why shouldn't it be good the second time"
Nostalgia is literally the answer as to why these remake films are successful. Aladdin and The Lion King both made the studio, $1 billion dollar each.
On a nostalgia basis
THEY WON'T STOP !
Why do you think Disney bought so many companies?!
Two weeks ago, they announced that they'll remake Home Alone and some other live action movies.
I think curiosity is also important. You hear Disney remade The Lion King or Alice in Wonderland in live action, it's difficult not to get curious.
Yeah! My Friend said "I want to make my own opinion", he doesn't think it'll be good but he still needs to give Disney $12 just get an opinion.
I was thinking the same thing @Wafawafa
@@Dilmahkana God I hate that transparent marketing strategy. Every shitty film maker always says "see the movie for yourself before you judge". In lieu of making a convincing trailer, arguably something ANY good film maker should be able to do, they just straight up ask for your money. Assholes.
I love this style of episode so much, when you let your passion for and knowledge of the industry show, and give some interesting highlights of the greater picture behind making movies. One of my favorite episodes as of late, would love to see more like this!
+Christian Mulligan Wow, thanks for that!
@@ChannelAwesome The videos where you talk about the industry or the culture of movie going as a whole are my favorites as well. This because it allows you to talk about the effect movies have on each other and the mindset of the studio behind them. Great video!
@@ChannelAwesome As someone who has been watching you since [one or two years after] your return, I deeply miss your editorials. It gave us something to think and to analyze and that is one of the things that makes a critic stand out.
This was a very gratifying video to watch.
This is an excellent representation of why I enjoy Nostalgia Critic.
I personally went to the new Lion King movie because I wanted to see how they would handle telling the story I already new and love through a new medium. While I knew that it was not going to be as good as the original I was not looking for it to be. To me the problem is simply that there too many of them coming out at the same time. If Disney were to release them further apart I feel people would be less annoyed with them as it would be a better balance of new and old material.
Glenn Close deserved an Oscar for her performance of cruella de ville
@@Rynn21 I doubt that highly. There is no way that killing dogs for fur coats could ever be misunderstood lmao. She's always been depicted as evil. In the original, in the live action remake, and in Once Upon a Time she was even depicted as loving evil and being evil by nature, unlike some of the other villains.
She did get a Golden Globe nomination for her performance, fortunately.
@@TECfan1 Actually Cruella has usually been brought as example of good villain on studies due she is perfect example of overall "decent" person with one fatal flaw. In other aspects Cruella wouldn't be any more evil than that well dressed boheme single aunt who has great career but dry and sarcastic attitude for those who are satisfied for less or just wanna have their nice little families. Annoying but not evil, like Hannibal, he would be one to be called to have nice cup of tea and have indepth chat with.
However, there is that proneness toward cannibalism or in Cruella's case the insistance to make em puppies for nice coats. In some societies not even that would raise that many eyebrows except maybe stealing those puppies from yer friend. That said it would be interesting if Disney had balls to go bit more psychological at why overall this little deVil became so fascinated to make especially puppies a part of her wardrobe.
That was over acting not acting
None of these remakes have the SOUL of the originals, either. It's like the Tethered: you can copy the original, but can't copy the soul.
So true what were they thinking trying to remake classics just for the money?
I love that you used an US reference and that it made perfect sense. When watching Lion King, I felt so hollow watching it and now I know why. It lacked the soul of the original.
@@Epodmusic17 yeah I was so hyped for it and then I was like eh it's okay but it won't ever compare to the original I did love how they made the hyenas more intelligent like they are in real life
U can't make a valid point with something as vague or abstract as a "soul"
god now you have giving me a new version of jordan peeles us where every animated characters is getting stalk and kill by his tethered version, with snowhite tethered as the leader with Lupita Nyong'os creppy voice... I DEMAND A PARODY OF THAT!!
Only Disney live action remake I want to see are the rule 34 versions.
Oh GOD!
I really hope to see Disney Live Action films get past this remake phase. A lot of my favorite films growing up were their live action stuff from old stuff like Mary Poppins, Treasure Island, and Who Framed Roger Rabbit to the more recent stuff like Pirates of the Caribbean, Enchanted, Chronicles of Narnia, or even National Treasure
I actually liked Alice In Wonderland 2010.
And people still wonder why I want to work for Pixar and not Disney. Disney makes money, Pixar makes stories and ideas come to life.
Pixar is also owned by Disney...
Lol Pixar is in the same boat. Look at all the Cars sequels, finding dory, incredibles 2, etc, that all came out decades after the original just to cash in
@@robertayotte4843 Incredibles 2 was actually good though. Not completely on the same level as the original, but still pretty good.
britipinojeff I don’t see how it’s good when it just reminds me of a swapped version of the first film with Bob staying at home and Helen going out on adventures and adding some new people and situations.
@@unamed2516 I liked the new fights in the sequel. Getting the Incredibles to fight against other supers that had interesting abilities like Void were pretty cool. Bob staying at home with the kids was also pretty funny to me at least with the stuff with Jack Jack being the best part.
The only thing wrong with Bob being at Home and Helen going off at least compared to the original is that in the original most of the family members were clearly going through their own internal struggles. With Bob wanting to be a hero again, Helen thinking Bob is cheating on her, and Violet and Dash's inner conflict with being super children. In the sequel it's just Bob being tired and still wanting to be a hero and Violet still having boy troubles.
For whatever reason the majority of people love them, because the audience score for lion king on rotten tomatoes is nearly 90%
review scores can be bought in exchange for exclusive deals on news and such, the gaming industry already does it, a game can be literally broken but it will get a 9 because it's a triple A release.
@@ginogatash4030 The audience scores on RT now require the voters to confirm that they've actually seen the movie. I dont doubt that your point has maybe some validity in other cases, but I do doubt that it would affect it *that* much.
The real answer to Doug's question is that the common moviegoer goes for an emotional experience and often don't think critically about what they're watching.
@Fox Lover not caring too much about the quality of a movie ≠ stupid
@@hkr0065 and how do they confirm that you saw the movie? if it's as simple as clicking "YES I'M 18 AND OLDER" on adult sites, than it's not gonna do much.
plus, having seen the movie doesn't mean they didn't pay for your review.
@@hkr0065 RT still ignores scores below 1 star no matter how bad a movie is, and will delete negative reviews en masse if it's a film from a big company.
Maleficent and it's sequel aren't remakes.
Aladdin didn't try to be a shot by shot of the original and had many good changes.
Mulan is completely different from the musical Disney version and is based more on the Ballad of Mulan.
The only remake as of late that was a 'shot by shot' of the original film this year, is The Lion King. But Maleficent, Aladdin and Mulan are different.
The only remakes that are shot for shot attempts is Beauty and the Beast about 90% of the time, and The Lion King about 99% of the time.
But a remake should NEVER be shot for shot.
What are the "many good changes" that Aladdin did?
I do believe That advert was the silliest youve ever done.
Disney: *makes childrens movies*
Also Disney: *refuses to let a father put a picture of Spider-Man on his four-year-old son’s gravestone, "in order to preserve the character’s **_innocence_** ".*
Let's make a Disney Live-Action Remake of the Nostalgia Critic intro!
*insert crappy intro with cardboard for videos*
TheGamerAdmin OR a crappy 3d one
Or animate it anyway and still call it Live action.
*cough*
13:33 is one of the funniest things I've seen on this channel
What really sucks is that this live action trend is probably going to die out before we get to the post-Renaissance era movies that would actually benefit from a remake (by making more people revisit them if nothing else), like Emperor's New Groove. That one has to be made while Patrick Warburton can still conceivably play Kronk.
"Simba and Nala have no chemistry, but you think they do because of the old movie"
Nope, even back then I thought that came out of nowhere. One of the things Lion King 2 actually did better is the leads actually interacted with each other, had contrasting personalities and had good chemistry with each other and the other characters.
The thing is that Lion King 2 was more of a love story while the original was a coming-of-age story. Therefore, that is why Lion King 2 focused a lot more on Kiara and Kovu's romance throughout the film given how crucial it was towards the plot while in the first movie, Simba and Nala's romance was more of side element but you still buy their genuine chemistry and that they were childhood friends (which we also got to see during the first half of the film).
Lauren210 Wholly disagree with Nala and Simba having chemistry. They HATED the idea of being married when they were kids, then they happen to find each other, act like FRIENDS again because that's what they were, and then they just happen to have a montage song and they're like "All right let's fuck".
Thank you!!! I always thought it came out of nowhere.
I love how he complains about the movie being a scene for scene and line for line copy of the original, but aparently the live action version was different? Wtf?
I personally have my 5 reasons
1-PEOPLE
2-JUST
3-CAN'T
4-SAY
5-NO
yet they say no to movies like a wrinkle in time and tomorrowland
@Fox Lover to be honest i congratulate you for saying frankly and openly what i was hinting at srsly i couldnt have said it better
You didn’t even mention Christopher Robin! It was real good in my book! Was more of a sequel if anything.
You know who's always been great at remaking their own classics? Toho with the Godzilla franchise.
Technically they rebooted him but true.
with only 3 circles, I dominate the planet.
Clearly there's nobody near me
The thunder god 1223 I’m owing this battle, in fact I own this whole series.
So hop on my steamboat, boys!
creeper
AWWW man
But don't rock it.
Unless they're updating the original or fixing plot holes, then they need to leave it alone. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
But if you break it, you can charge for fixin' it back
Or if it is broken, still don't fix it. The bright silver ducktape patching up the cracks doesn't make it better.
All movies have plot holes if you look hard enough (and trying to fix them tend to make more of them).
The thing is, doing the opposite of what you're saying has made them a lot of money and that's all they care about
They fixed a plot hole in the new lion king movie but the rest of it sucked, so fixing plot holes doesn't work
At least Pixar is going back to making beloved original animated films the following decade the next year with two films:Onward and Soul. But the company just feels sad without it’s beloved founder,John Lasseter
Because of nostalgia?
Seems pretty simple, Nostalgia Critic.